Government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) (gba)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Rathenau Instituut


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Rathenau Instituut

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Onderzoek en dialoog, Informatiefunctie

1.5. Contact mail address

Rathenau Instituut

Postbus 95366

2509 CJ Den Haag

The Netherlands


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 16/11/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 16/11/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 16/11/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Government Budget Allocations for R&D (GBARD) measure government support to research and development (R&D) activities, and thereby provide information about the priority governments give to different public R&D funding activities. This type of funder-based approach for reporting R&D involves identifying all the budget items that may support R&D activities and measuring or estimating their R&D content.

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities (FM 2015, Chapter 12), which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020.

The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (europa.eu)).

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system

Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) is based on the Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS) at one digit level.

3.2.1. National classification
National nomenclature of SEO used Not applicable
Correspondence table with NABS NABS is used to classify socio-economic objectives for GBARD
3.2.2. NABS classification
Deviations from NABS  Not applicable
Problems in identifying / separating NABS chapters and sub chapters All expenditure is classified by NABS chapters and sub-chapters. Repondents at the departments are asked to indicate how the expenditure in the programmes and projects is divided over NABS categories. In some cases, estimates have used in order to classify the expenditure. 
Ability to distribute Non-oriented research and General University Funds (GUF) by fields of R&D 

Research organisations providing none-oriented research are asked to indicate how their funding is divided over NABS 13 sub categories. A small part of the research cannot be divided over the NABS 13 sub categories. This part is ultimately divided, based on the available division within NABS 13. 

GUF is divided by NABS 12 sub categories, using the percentage-division of funds in the aggregate talent programme's of the National scientific research funding agency.   

3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D Research and development (R&D) includes systematically performed, creative activities, based on scientific methods and aims to increase knowledge, including knowledge of humans, culture and society, and on developing new applications based on available knowledge or improving existing applications. Characteristic of R&D is the element of originality or innovation in the research. R&D activities must therefore meet five criteria: novelty, creativity, uncertainty, systematic and repeatable.
Coverage of R&D or S&T in general Good
Fields of R&D (FORD) covered All 
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS) Covered 
3.3.2. Definition and coverage of government

GBARD statistics are assumed to report detailed data on all the government's budget items that may support R&D activities and to measure or estimate their R&D content. For the purposes of GBARD, the Government sector comprises (a) the central (federal) government, (b) regional (state) government and (c) local (municipal) government subsectors (FM2015, Chapter 12).

 

Levels of government Definition Included / Not included Comments
Central (federal) government Rijksoverheid: National government  Included National ministries / departments
Regional (state) government Provinces  Not included Contribution to R&D funding less than 3% 
Local (municipal) government Municipalities  Not included  Contribution to R&D funding expected to be marginal
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not requested.

3.5. Statistical unit

National government departments

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units, which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Definition of the national target population  National government departments
Estimation of the target population size  
3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. The base year for the unit Purchasing Power Standard (PPS) and PPS per inhabitant at constant prices is currently 2005. All calculations of non-basic unit (national currencies) are done by Eurostat.


4. Unit of measure Top

Not requested.


5. Reference Period Top

a) Calendar year: 2021 (final expenditure)

 


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

Since the beginning of 2021, GBARD statistics are based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  GBARD statistics were based until the end of 2020 on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

6.1.2. National legislation

Not applicable

6.1.3. Standards and manuals

-          Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

-          EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law: not applicable

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff: not applicable

 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

not applicable


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Data are provided to Eurostat by 31 December every year: final expenditure for year t-1 and provisional expenditure for year t. As well as multi-annual forecast for the years t+1, t+2, t+3 and t+4

Publication of the data and a report is offered to the National Parliament in April every year. 

 

8.2. Release calendar access

Not publicly available. 

8.3. Release policy - user access

The data are published open access on www.rathenau.nl and a mailing to inform users about the release is sent out to all known potential users of the data as well as national parliament.  


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual dissemination and publication, in Dutch only.

Totale investeringen in wetenschap en innovatie (TWIN) 2021-2027 - Revisie | Rathenau Instituut

An English version of the report and the data file can be made accessible if requested. 


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y Totale investeringen in wetenschap en innovatie (TWIN) 2021-2027 - Revisie | Rathenau Instituut
Ad-hoc releases  Y  in case of updates or specific factsheets

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y  Totale investeringen in wetenschap en innovatie (TWIN) 2021-2027 - Revisie | Rathenau Instituut
Specific paper publication

(paper, online)

 Y Totale investeringen in wetenschap en innovatie 2021-2027 - Revisie (rathenau.nl) 

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

see below.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

 

Totale investeringen in wetenschap en innovatie (TWIN) 2021-2027 - Revisie | Rathenau Instituut 

Totaaloverzicht (XLSX file)

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information The data are open access available in XLSX format 
Access cost policy no costs involved 
Micro-data anonymisation rules Micro-data per department are presented at programme level 
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Micro-data and aggregate figures  www.rathenau.nl
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests Y  Micro-data and aggregate figures  On request. Prepared data and results are thereafter published open access.
Other  Y Data are used in graphs and figures in various other publications of the Rathenau Institute See also: Science in figures | Rathenau Instituut 

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

See below.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, etc.)   Metadata, methodological explanation, graphs etc. all in report
Request on further clarification Sometimes we receive requests for further clarification, for example on how to work with the data and what are similarities and differences between R&D expenditure data and GBARD data   
Measure to increase clarity We provide additional explanatory texts in report whenever we receive request for clarification.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  The feedback that we receive is that the data and the report are highly valued by users


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Researchers working in the unit on GBARD statistics are specialised in quantitative data management and analysis, at minimum MA or MSc level.

Researchers working with the GBARD data receive training and support by the coordinator as required.

Researchers work always in couples on the GBARD project. 

We have recently introduced extra attention for the 'four eyes' principle at the departments delivering the data. 

 

 

11.2. Quality management - assessment

We make use of a guideline (TWIN-Handleiding) for data collection, checks and analyses.

We do several checks on the data: historical and internal consistency, checks with new policy announcements, coalition agreements, etc.

We compare with matching government R&D expenditure based on data from R&D performers perspective, from the national statistics bureau. 

If in doubt, we contact the delivering departments to double check and provide clarification.

We send out reminders to ensure full coverage and response rates from all participating departments and if needed, we do a follow up with telephone calls and additional reminders. 

During and after data processing, we do cross-checks of aggregates and sub-totals, and spotchecks to validate the data.

The data and report are checked by supervisor before publication. The report and data within are checked by two collegues and the chief scientist of the institute, as well as by three external peers from three different relevant government departments. 

Compliance is monitored by the unit supervisor (coordinator), who has over 8 years working experience on the GBARD project in the Netherlands.

Every year after publication of the data en the report, the GBARD project subject to an internal evaluation in order to improve the process and quality if and where possible. Enhanced political interest in the data and report increasinly ensure that we and the officials at the data delivering departments are aware of the importance of correctness of the data.   

 


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 Institutions European Commission and Parliament. OECD

 Overview of realised and planned R&D investments by government, in time series by department and NABS and in relation to gdp. OECD, UNESCO: data delivery

 Institutions National and regional and National Statistics bureau (CBS)  Realised and planned R&D investments by government, in time series by department and NABS and in relation to gdp. CBS: cross check on GUF and government R&D expenditure for HE sector.  
 Social actors Unions of the universities (UNL), university medical centres (NFU) and universities of applied sciences (VH), TO2-institutes and 4-TU federation, Platform Beta Techniek, RKI-Netwerk, CAOP. Also individual institutes (eg. WUR, TNO). Overview of realised and planned R&D investments by government, in time series by department and NABS and in relation to gdp, but also government R&D expenditure by type of research performing institute. Also: microdata.
 Media, researchers and students  Various request Press release, interviews about the findings, results and implications, micro-data. 

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction Every 5 years, an evaluation of the institute is being done, where stakeholders are specifically asked what units and types of work of the institute they are familiar with and how they would assess the quality of the work.
User satisfaction survey specific for GBARD statistics  We present the GBARD data and main findings of the report to users at government departments, parliamentarians and other users and get immediate feedback about user satisfaction and potential to improve the data and reporting.
Short description of the feedback received  The feedback received from users is generally very positive and they seem to be satisfied. 
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Data are complete

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells
Provisional budget statistics1  x          
Obligatory final budget statistics1  x          
Optional final budget statistics2          

1)  Criteria: Obligatory data (provisional budget and final budget). Only 'Very Good' = 100% and 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

2)  Criteria: Optional data (final budget). 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%;'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability – Provisional data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD  Y  2000 - 2022 Annual  none T+6  
NABS Chapter level  Y  2000 - 2022  Annual none  T+6   
NABS Sub-chapter level  Y  2000 - 2022 Annual  none  T+6   
Special categories - Biotech N        
Special categories - Nanotech        
Special categories - Security        

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.2. Data availability – Final data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD Y  1999 - 2021 Annual none T+18  
NABS Chapter level Y  1999 - 2021  Annual  none  T+18   
NABS Sub-chapter level Y  1999 - 2021 Annual  none  T+18   
Special categories - Biotech        
Special categories - Nanotech        
Special categories - Security        

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.3. Data availability – Other special categories
Special categories Stage1 Availability1 Frequency of data colletion Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)3 Comments
Budget  P Y 2001 - 2023  Annual  none T  
Multi-annual budget forecast P Y 2002 - 2024 
   
 Annual
 none T-12   
Multi-annual budget forecast  Y 2003 - 2025  Annual  none  T-24   
Multi-annual budget forecast  Y 2004 - 2026  Annual  none  T-36   
Multi-annual budget forecast  P Y 2005 - 2027 Annual  none  T-48   
             

1) Stage: P - provisional, F - final. 

2) Availability of the data: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

3) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
           Underestimation

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5) In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for GBARD.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy
 Indicators 5 (Very Good)1 4 (Good)2 3 (Satisfactory)3 2 (Poor)4 1 (Very poor)5
 GBARD    x      
National public funding to transnationally coordinated R & D      x    

1) High level of coverage (At least all national or federal ministries and the ministries and agencies responsible for R&D funding at state or regional level). High rate of response (>90%) in data collection. All figures broken down by NABS.  

2) If at least one out of the three criteria described above would not be fully met.

3) In the event that the rate of response would be lower than 80% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 70% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) If all the three criteria described above are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

Not requested.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not requested.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 The total target population is included in the sample.  

 Only exception is the ministry of finance. 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 The ministry has been approached to discuss their potential participation. The ministry does not participate as they expect the contribution of the ministry to R&D expenditure is marginal. We will contact the ministry again in the near future to discuss if the situation may have changed.  

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

There is no over-coverage

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors

 It is not always easy for the officials at the ministries to estimate the expected expenditure on R&D in programmes with mixed activitities (e.g. where R&D is not the only activity taking place within the programme, and is combined with other activities, such as innovation activities without an R&D component or government service delivery activities, etc.  The same applies to the allocation of programmes or expenditure within programmes to specific NABS codes, especially where multiple socio-economic objectives are pursued with or within a programme.  

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 Together with the GBARD questionnaire, a Guideline (Handleiding) is sent to the respondents at the ministries who are supposed to collect the data. In addition, we offer guidance and support whenever officials feel they want to ask or discuss issues related to the data collection or allocation with the coordinator, who has over 8 years of experience with GBARD data.     

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response errors: occur when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

 

a) Problems in obtaining data from targeted information providers:

 Data are sometimes delivered after our deadline, but generally, we still manage to get all the data from all the population units just in time to complete our analysis and data delivery to Eurostat in time. 

b) Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 We mail and call to follow-up our data request.

c) Effect of non-response errors on the produced statistics:

 One ministry has indicated not to participate in the data delivery as they expect their contribution to R&D to be negligible. All other ministries participate and generally do deliver the requested data.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

 

a)       Data processing and editing processes:

          Data entry by the contactpersons at the departments is done in the same format as the analysis, which limits errors. Imputation is kept to a minimum as the departments are requested to fill in the R&D expenditure for all the years (t-1, t, t+1, t+2...upto t+5) that programmes are running.

The coefficient for GUF is ideally based on the (year closest to the) final expenditure year (t-1).  This coefficient is then also applied to the preliminary expenditure in (t) and the budget year (t+1).

 This may also apply to the percentage of programmes which is expected to be spent on R&D.  

b)      Description of errors:

It may occur that the coefficient based on year (t) leads to a small over- or under-estimation in the preliminary data (t), budget data (t+1) and multi-annual forecasts.   

The R&D-expenditure in a number of programmes is based on a judgement by the departmental respondents about the expected expenditure on R&D within the programme in the final year (t-1). This perentage is then mostly also applied to the consequetive years.       

c)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Mostly, the change in the coefficient between two consequetive years is rather small. Over the period between 1999 and 2000, the difference in the coeffcient between two consequetive years has on average been 0,3%. By using the coefficient closest to the final realisation year, the data for the final expenditure are as close to realisation as possible.

The data for t, t+1 and later years are corrected before they become final, based on the coefficient that has been calculated for that specific year. This also applies to the percentage of the programme funding which is spent on R&D.   

  

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Model assumption errors occur when the assumptions made for the estimation of parameters, models, the testing of statistical hypotheses, etc., are violated. As a result, the quality of the resulting statistics is affected (e.g. degrees of confidence might be inflated).

Description/assessment: 

Not applicable


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Date of first release of national data: T+6 (June 2023)

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Date of first release of national data: T+12 (June 2023)

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

The actual data release has been punctual.  

 

 

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 6 12
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)                                             0                                  12
Delay (days)   0  0
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Regulation No 2020/1197, Frascati manual and the EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issue Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Research and development FM2015 Chapter 2 (mainly paragraphs 2.3 and 2.4). no  
Coverage of levels of government FM2015, §12.5 to 12.9 no  
Socioeconomic objectives coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20 no  
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20  no  
15.1.3. Deviations from recommendations

GBARD encompass all spending allocations met from sources of government revenue foreseen within the budget, such as taxation. Spending allocations by extra-budgetary government entities are within the scope only to the extent that their funds are allocated through the budgetary process (FM2015 §12.9). The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national GBARD statistics.

 

Methodological issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations  National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Definition of GBARD FM § 12.9 no  
Stages of data collection FM2015 §12.41 no  
Gross / net approach, net principle FM2015 §12.20 and 12.21 no  
EU/other funds Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics no  
Types of expenditure FM2015 §12.15 to 12.18 no  
Current and capital expenditure FM §12.15 no  
Extra budgetary funds FM §12.8, 12.20, 12.38 no   
Loans FM §12.31, 12.32, 12.34 no  
Indirect funding, tax rebates, etc. FM §12.31 - 12.38 no   
Treatment of multi-annual projects FM2015 §12.44 no  
Treatment of GBARD going to R&D abroad FM2015 §12.19 no  
Criterion for distribution by socioeconomic objective FM2015 §12.50 to 12.71 no  
Method of identification of primary objective Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics, topic 2, statement B.6 no  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
Provisional data 2000 - 2022 none  
Final data 1999 - 2021  none   

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.4. Coherence - internal

This part compares GBARD statistics from the provisional and final budget for the reference year.

15.4.1. Comparison between provisional and final data according to NABS 2007
  R&D allocations in the provisional budget delivered at T+6 R&D allocations in the final budget delivered at T+12 Difference (of final data)
Exploration and exploitation of the Earth           59,440.575  57,531.682                        -1.908,893
Environment           48,618.417  46,038.750                       -2.579,667
Exploration and exploitation of space         144,602.936  146,419.244                           1.816,308
Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures         118,484.272 119,461.311                              977,039
Energy         147,052.195 138,225.667                        -8.826,528
Industrial production and technology         384,706.306 338,229.158                      -46.477,148
Health         527,288.682 535,317.167                          8.028,485
Agriculture         226,046.042 219,594.219                         -6.451,823
Education           42,947.718 47,152.500                          4.204,782
Culture, recreation, religion and mass media           18,629.230 21,601.970                         2.972,740
Political and social systems, structures and processes           89,725.176 86,974.558                        -2.750,618
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from General University Funds (GUF)     3,744,908.248  3,764,168.689                        19.260,441
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from other sources than GUF     1,145,989.635 1,111,427.438                      -34.562,197
Defence         107,244.689 214,922.016                     107.677,327
TOTAL GBARD     6,805,684.121 6,847,064.369                        41.380,248


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs not specified None
Data collection costs not specified  None 
Other costs not specified None 
Total costs not specified None 
Comments on costs
 Costs on producing GBARD are not separately available

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R) 13 National government department contact points  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1

not available

 
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C) EUR 108

 Average (Senior) Policy Advisor level, excl. VAT

Handleiding Overheidstarieven 2023 (rijksfinancien.nl)

Total cost not available   

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Data are revised only in case we are informed of substantial changes in the realised expenditure data due to changes in one of the coefficients, which affect the amount or distribution of the funding.   

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

a)       Provisional data: Survey amongst officials at the ministries, based on the provisional expenditure figures in the latest National budget presented to parliament.   

 

b)      Final data: Survey amongst officials at the ministries, based on the final expenditure figures in the latest National budget presented to parliament. 

 

c)       General University Funds (GUF): Survey amongst officials at the ministries, based on the final expenditure figures in the latest National budget presented to parliament combined with research coefficient. The research coefficient is annually calculated by the National Statistics Bureau (CBS), which is based on the number of research fte divided by the total academic personnel fte (most recent realisation year). 

18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
  Provisional data Final data Comments
Data collection method Survey and coefficients Survey and coefficients  
Stage of data collection Initial budget appropriations  Final budget appropriations   
Reporting units Ministries Ministries  
Basic variable Allocations Allocations  The difference between these variables is difficult to translate
Time of data collection (T+x)1)  T T+8   
Problems in the translation of budget items  

1) Time of data collection (T+x): T is assumed to represent the end of reference period. x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is collected.

18.3.2. General University Funds (GUF)

A research coefficient is used to determine the share of the national government contribition to the universities that is spent on research. This coefficient is calculated every year for the final year based on research fte divided by total academic fte, by our National Statistics Bureau (CBS).    

18.3.3. Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO)
Level of distribution of budgetary items – institution or programme/project Programme
Criterion of distribution – purpose or content Mainly purpose (objective) 
Method of identification of primary objectives Annual survey amongst government officials 
Difficulties of distribution Sometimes, programmes contribute to multiple objectives. In such cases, the R&D expenditure of the programme s divided over the respective SEO's / NABS codes  
18.3.4. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  not available
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  URL below: TWIN Questionnaire format
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English: not available
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  URL below: TWIN Handleiding


Annexes:
TWIN Questionnaire format
TWIN Handleiding
18.4. Data validation

Annually, the coordinator checks that 100% of the ministries that are expected to deliver the data, are mailed with the data request, together with a letter, the questionnaire format and the manual for data collection (Handleiding). The ministries are being e-mailed with reminders and if necessary this is followed up by telephone calls, to ensure data delivery as requested. We do macro edits as well as mirco edits and always compare the statistics with the previous year's data collected for all the years for which such comparative data are available. Were possible, we compare the resulting GBARD data against data from our National Statistics Bureau based on the survey of R&D-performers. We also look at external policy documents and coalition agreement documents.  Any apparent inconsistencies in the statistics are further investigated and we may request the officials in the department to look into apparent inconsistencies as well. We are also offering guidance and support in case officials reponsible for the data collection have questions or ask for our advise.  

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

No imputation is done

18.5.2. Data compilation methods

See below.

18.5.2.1. Identifying R&D
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D  We use a coefficient to distinguish R&D expenditure within GUF from other expenditure.
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  
Coefficient estimation method   The coefficient is based on research fte divided by total academic fte. 
Frequency of updating of coefficients  Annually
18.5.2.2. General University Funds (GUF)
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D  See 18.5.2.1
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  
Coefficient estimation method  
Frequency of updating of coefficients  
18.5.2.3. Other issues
Treatment of multi-annual programmes  n/a
Possibility to classify budgetary items by COFOG functions n/a 
Possibility to classify budgetary items by other nomenclatures e.g. NACE n/a 
Method of estimation of future budgets n/a 
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top

Not applicable


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top