Government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) (gba)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: National Documentation Centre (EKT)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

National Documentation Centre (EKT)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

RDI Metrics and Services Department

1.5. Contact mail address

56, Zefyrou, GR-17564, P. Faliro


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 21/11/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 21/11/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 21/11/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Government Budget Allocations for R&D (GBARD) measure government support to research and development (R&D) activities, and thereby provide information about the priority governments give to different public R&D funding activities. This type of funder-based approach for reporting R&D involves identifying all the budget items that may support R&D activities and measuring or estimating their R&D content.

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities (FM 2015, Chapter 12), which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020.

The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (europa.eu)).

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system

Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) is based on the Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS) at one digit level.

3.2.1. National classification
National nomenclature of SEO used  National classification is not used.
Correspondence table with NABS  Not applicable.
3.2.2. NABS classification
Deviations from NABS  Not applicable.
Problems in identifying / separating NABS chapters and sub chapters  No problems. Information at sub-chapter level has not been collected.
Ability to distribute Non-oriented research and General University Funds (GUF) by fields of R&D   

“Non-oriented research” and “general university funds (GUF)” are not available by field of science (FOS).

3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  Frascati Manual definition to identify R&D.
Coverage of R&D or S&T in general  GBARD statistics cover R&D.
Fields of R&D (FORD) covered  GBARD data cover NSE and SSH.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  GBARD data cover SEO by NABS.
3.3.2. Definition and coverage of government

GBARD statistics are assumed to report detailed data on all the government's budget items that may support R&D activities and to measure or estimate their R&D content. For the purposes of GBARD, the Government sector comprises (a) the central (federal) government, (b) regional (state) government and (c) local (municipal) government subsectors (FM2015, Chapter 12).

 

Levels of government Definition Included / Not included Comments
Central (federal) government   Ministries (Central Administrations), General Secretariats  included  

Included are:

Ministries (Central Administrations) and General Secretariats.

General Secretariats are covered as separate reporting units in cases of important R&D Secretariats (e.g. General Secretariat for Research and Technology) or in cases of complex structures in some Ministries (e.g. Ministry of Environment).
Regional (state) government  Self-governed Public Legal Entities  included  Regions are territorially self-governed Public Legal Entities responsible for planning and implementing policies at regional level.
Local (municipal) government    Not included  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not requested.

3.5. Statistical unit

All Ministries, according to the Register of General Government Entities maintained at the Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT), and all regional authorities.  General Secretariats are covered as separate reporting units in cases of important R&D Secretariats (e.g. General Secretariat for Research and Innovation) or in cases of complex structures in some Ministries (e.g. Ministry of Environment).

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units, which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Definition of the national target population  All Ministries and Regional Authorities.
Estimation of the target population size

Ministries and Regional Authorities according to the government structure in 2021:
23 Ministries (including some important General Secretariats as separate statistical units)
and 13 Regional Authorities.

3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. 


4. Unit of measure Top

Not requested.


5. Reference Period Top

a) Calendar year: 2021

 

b) Fiscal year: 2021

    Start month: January

    End month: December


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

Since the beginning of 2021, GBARD statistics are based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  GBARD statistics were based until the end of 2020 on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

6.1.2. National legislation

GBARD statistics are governed by general national statistical legislation.

More specifically:

All available in Greek only: https://metrics.ekt.gr/about

6.1.3. Standards and manuals

-          Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

-          EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 

Confidentiality issues are clearly defined in the provisions on statistical confidentiality of the Greek statistical law (Law 3832/2010, as amended and in force), and are further specified in the Regulation on the Statistical Obligations of the Agencies of the Hellenic Statistical System (ELSS).

As an Agency of the ELSS and a National Authority, EKT fully implements the above law and regulation as well as the European Statistics Code of Practice (principle 5 and relevant indicators). To this end, EKT has developed and published its Statistical Confidentiality Policy (https://metrics.ekt.gr/sites/metrics-ekt/files/pages-pdf/EKT_Policy_StatisticalConfidentiality_el.pdf ).

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 The internal personnel employed in the RDI statistics unit at EKT, the external statistical correspondents used for the collection and checking of primary data of its statistical surveys, as well as the external experts providing EKT with technical support or being assigned to carry out statistical works on account of EKT, commit themselves to the observance of statistical confidentiality of the data to which they have access or which they handle and sign a statistical confidentiality declaration. 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Concerning the procedures to identify confidential cells in data delivered to Eurostat, no confidential suppression/protection was applied on GBARD data. Personal data collected through the collection process are strictly confidential, are used by the EKT for statistical purposes only and are not publicized or disseminated to third parties in any way.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The anticipated release dates for GBARD data are included in the annual release calendar published by EKT during the first week of December each year.

8.2. Release calendar access

The release calendar is available online (https://metrics.ekt.gr/statistics-announcements)   

8.3. Release policy - user access

EKT provides equal and simultaneous access to its statistical products for all users, as outlined in the Dissemination Policy it adheres to (https://metrics.ekt.gr/sites/metrics-ekt/files/pages-pdf/EKT_Policy_Dissemination_el.pdf). EKT fully complies with the relevant principles and regulations of the Statistical Confidentiality Policy.

 The primary source of information for all R&D statistics produced by EKT, accessible to all users, is available on the following page: http://metrics.ekt.gr/


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

GBARD data are produced and disseminated on a yearly basis.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y  Each GBARD data publication is accompanied by press releases, which are distributed to all media outlets in Greece, as well as shared on social media platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn. They are also published on EKT's website.
Ad-hoc releases    

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y  

Dedicated webpage for GBARD statistics https://metrics.ekt.gr/gbard has been created by EKT. GBARD data dissemination is made through different formats:

 1) Publications (https://metrics.ekt.gr/gbard/publications ): Publications that present the main findings of the GBARD survey and in addition publications which analyze specific issues more in depth. Some of the publications are also available in English.

(2) Data briefs (https://metrics.ekt.gr/gbard/articles): Brief analysis of the results for specific topics.  These reports are in Greek.

 3) Data tables (https://metrics.ekt.gr/gbard/datatables): This is a dissemination tree where we publish data in the form of data tables. This data tree is in Greek only.

Specific paper publication

(paper, online)

 Y  GBARD data for 2021 have been presented in the publication hhttps://metrics.ekt.gr/publications/628

Online publication with the overall GBARD results during the reference time 2008-2018 https://metrics.ekt.gr/publications/340

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Aggregate figures.

Data tables: https://metrics.ekt.gr/gbard/datatables. Data are currently shown in Greek only.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Microdata access is not provided to users outside EKT.
Upon user requests, we produce more detailed analysis compared to the analysis of data requested and transmitted to Eurostat. 
Access cost policy  No charges.
Micro-data anonymisation rules  Not applicable.
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y  Aggregate figures  https://metrics.ekt.gr/gbard/datatables
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Aggregate figures  Upon request from policy makers, expert group meetings, etc.
Other  Aggregate figures  Data presented in the form of short articles

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

The production of GBARD statistics follows the Frascati Manual 2015 concepts, definitions and methodology as well as Eurostat "FM2015 Implementation, Harmonisation EU Guidelines" as updated. A detailed handbook on GBARD collection processes has been developed (internal) and is continuously enriched and improved. National metadata (in Greek) are made available to all users in the dedicated EKT website. https://metrics.ekt.gr/sites/metrics-ekt/files/pages-pdf/EKT_SIMS_GBARDstatistics_el.pdf

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, etc.)   

National metadata (in Greek) are made available to all users in the dedicated EKT website. https://metrics.ekt.gr/sites/metrics-ekt/files/pages-pdf/EKT_SIMS_GBARDstatistics_el.pdf

Moreover, a glossary is available online to explain all the R&D related concepts, NABS classification e.tc: https://metrics.ekt.gr/lexicon .

Publications with graphs, tables, maps, etc. specific to each authority (ministry, general secretariate, regional authority) were been prepared during the first round of GBARD collection in 2012, containing also some methodological notes about the survey.

Publications with extensive presentation of the GBARD methodology and with detailed presentation of all results have also been prepared and presented to key stakeholders during conferences.

Request on further clarification  No further clarifications have been received.
Measure to increase clarity  Continuous update of lexicon, regular release of publications and use of social media to raise the awareness on GBARD data and concepts. 
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   Users of GBARD statistics that participated in the user satisfaction survey, reported that they are aware of the accompanying information that is available on the website. They report to have used it and they perceive that the quality of this information is high.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

EKT is an Agency of the Hellenic Statistical System (ELSS) and a National Authority, and as such it fully complies with the European and international standards concerning statistical methodologies, organizational procedures and IT infrastructure. EKT also complies strictly with the national and European legislative framework about statistics. EKT;s quality policy is publicly available https://metrics.ekt.gr/policies .

The certification of RDI statistics produced by EKT is currently under way, in the framework of the Hellenic Statistical System. The process is led by the Hellenic Statistical Authority. EKT follows the GSBPM model (Generic Statistical Business Process Model) for the production of RDI statistics. Accordingly, the workflow of a typical GBARD collection follows all level 1 phases of the GSBPM model and level 2 sub processes, modified to meet the specific sector and data collection requirements. A detailed handbook on the production of GBARD statistics has been developed and is continuously enriched and improved.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The overall quality of the GBARD statistical outputs is very good and captures precisely the funding flows of the government budget that are oriented for R&D purposes. The methodology has been designed in line with the FM recommendations, the relevant Commission Regulation and Eurostat guidelines. The continuous improvement is a key goal set by EKT and is implemented alongside the phases of GSBPM model.

Firstly, requirements of national users are met (such as the Hellenic Statistical Authority, the central /regional Monitoring Committees of the national development projects (ESPA projects) etc.). Moreover, in 2015, EKT realized detailed case studies in 6 central (ministries) as well as regional funding authorities. The case studies were performed through on site visits and interviews with respondents. The following topics were investigated: the data collection methodology and the systems used by the responding authorities, the problems faced as well as probable measurement errors, best practices in data collection as well as motives for respondents to participate in the survey.

In each GBARD collection round, thorough validation is carried out to check the quality as well the coherence of the outputs produced. To this end, in addition to the extensive statistical checking, multiple official sources as well as text analysis are used to check the collected data against relevant data. The final outputs are interpreted using both tangible and tacit knowledge accumulated at EKT. 


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  EUROSTAT  Production of European statistics
Data dissemination in Eurobase. 
 European Commission, other European agencies  Policy making for R&D and Innovation.
 OECD, Ministries, Regional Authorities, Central /regional Monitoring Committees of the ESPA national development projects etc.  Data analysis and international comparability, dissemination of national data, drafting of publications
Policy making and national strategic planning for R&D and Innovation, Monitoring of Government Budget allocations devoted to R&D,  Monitoring and evaluation of ESPA National Development Frameworks (the current “Partnership Agreement for the Development Framework 2014-2020” as well as the preceding “National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013) and of the Regional smart specialization policies (RIS) at national, regional and sectoral level.
 Media  Country performance in relation to other European countries.
4 Researchers, students Analyses of public sector R&D funding (main public funders, funding streams and instruments), data analysis for the needs of MSc programmes or PhD thesis.

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  

Users workshops / meetings are organized with key stakeholders and policy makers (General Secretariat for Research and Technology, Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs, Ministry of Development and Investment, central /regional Monitoring Committees of the ESPA national development projects e.tc.) on a systematic base, at least once a year. Feedback is taken into consideration in the GBARD survey design.

A wide user satisfaction survey was conducted in 2015. The survey consisted of two parts: a) electronic questionnaire and b) interviews with most important/ key users (e.g. officials from the General Secretariat for Research and Technology, key researchers).

 In addition, the following link https://metrics.ekt.gr/feedback is available  with the aim to get users’ feedback and capture their satisfaction regarding the quality of the statistics produced. Each user can add any comments on this link and respective form. In addition, the user can evaluate the usefulness of the statistics produced and utilised based on a dropdown likert scale list (from not at all to very much useful). The user can also add any propositions for improvements in a specific cell in the form mentioned above.

User satisfaction survey specific for GBARD statistics  The users’ workshops are focused on GBARD statistics: the main results are presented and explained with additional information and breakdowns relevant to the national environment.   
As regards the user survey, the questionnaire provided separate questions for each set of RDI statistics: R&D, GBARD and Innovation statistics.
Short description of the feedback received  Following the analysis of the feedback received by the form and link mentioned above, users are overall very satisfied with the quality of the statistics produced. At a wider audience, user survey results showed that GBARD indicators are used at least once every three months and they are considered very important.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

100%. All mandatory variables are covered and transmitted to Eurostat. 

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells
Provisional budget statistics1  X          
Obligatory final budget statistics1  X          
Optional final budget statistics2    X        

1)  Criteria: Obligatory data (provisional budget and final budget). Only 'Very Good' = 100% and 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

2)  Criteria: Optional data (final budget). 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%;'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability – Provisional data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD  Y (- before 1983)   Annual  2009, 2010     
NABS Chapter level  Y  Annual       
NABS Sub-chapter level  Y-2001   Annual until 2008       
Special categories - Biotech  Y-2001   Annual until 2008       
Special categories - Nanotech          
Special categories - Security          

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.2. Data availability – Final data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD  Y-1978   Annual       
NABS Chapter level  Y-1978   Annual       
NABS Sub-chapter level  Y-1986  Annual until 2008       
Special categories - Biotech  Y-1984   Annual until 2008       
Special categories - Nanotech          
Special categories - Security          

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.3. Data availability – Other special categories
Special categories Stage1 Availability1 Frequency of data colletion Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)3 Comments
 GBARD by Project/Institutional funding   P/F  Y-2008   Annually       
 GBARD by Ordinary / Investment budget  P/F  Y-2008   Annually       GBARD covers the two main flows of  government budget: Ordinary budget and Investment budget. Ordinary budget provides mainly the institutional funding which is allocated to institutes of the public sector (including universities as well as institutions located abroad e.g. CERN). Investment budget provides funding in the form of projects/programmes allocated to both public and private institutes (project funding).
 GBARD by Ministry / Region  P/F  Y-2008   Annually       
             
             
             

1) Stage: P - provisional, F - final. 

2) Availability of the data: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

3) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
   2  1  4  3  -  +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5) In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for GBARD.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy
 Indicators 5 (Very Good)1 4 (Good)2 3 (Satisfactory)3 2 (Poor)4 1 (Very poor)5
 GBARD   X        
National public funding to transnationally coordinated R & D   X         

1) High level of coverage (At least all national or federal ministries and the ministries and agencies responsible for R&D funding at state or regional level). High rate of response (>90%) in data collection. All figures broken down by NABS.  

2) If at least one out of the three criteria described above would not be fully met.

3) In the event that the rate of response would be lower than 80% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 70% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) If all the three criteria described above are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

Not requested.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not requested.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 Coverage errors are considered to be insignificant. GBARD survey covers all the government organizations, at both central and regional level, that may fund R&D through state budget, e.g. all Ministries and all Regional Authorities.  

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

The exact list of responding units is continuously updated, following any changes in the structure of government bodies, and is aligned with the Register of General Government Entities of the Hellenic Statistical Authority (ELSTAT).

Funding authorities are asked to report detailed information on funding flows that are oriented to each R&D performer separately through each stream of the government budget. Moreover, updated administrative data retrieved from the central Special Service for the Monitoring Information System (M.I.S.) is provided to the respondents to support them in the identification of R&D projects. (MIS is the central monitoring system of ESPA e.g. all Operational and Regional Programs of the current Partnership Agreement for the Development Framework 2014-2020 as well as the preceding National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013. ESPA is the main component of Public Investment Budget.)

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

0%

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 The main difficulties that have been reported by respondents are a) the identification of the R&D part of funds that are not fully dedicated for R&D purposes b) the distribution of funds into the NABS socio-economic objectives, which is not always straightforward since central and regional Government authorities do not use the NABS classification in their budget functions. Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

Measurement errors are reduced through the questionnaire that decomposes total GBARD into the different budget streams by beneficiary organisation (R&D performers) or R&D project. In some cases, mostly reported when distributing the ordinary budget for R&D (institutional R&D funding), reporting units are consulting the performing institutions about the content of R&D in their activities and the distribution of R&D to NABS objectives.  

To further reduce any errors and discontinuity in the data reported, the part of the questionnaire asking for final budget data of year X is pre-filled with the information that was provided by the reporting units with reference to provisional budget data for the same year X.

EKT, by utilizing its expertise on issues concerning R&D, provides specific guidelines and support to respondents as to ensure that the identification, quantification and distribution (NABS) of R&D funds is made according to Eurostat definitions. Constant telephone follow-up for guidance and clarifications as well face-to-face meetings with the staff involved in the compilation of the data were also realized. Finally, cross-checking was performed with other relevant administrative sources publicly available e.g. budget execution bulletins, ESPA monitoring portals, etc.  

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response errors: occur when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

 

a) Problems in obtaining data from targeted information providers:

 Data have been collected by all (100%) R&D Funders including ministries, general secretariats and regional authorities.

b) Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 1) constant telephone follow-up, 2) letter reminders that were addressed to the heads of the agencies (mainly to the relevant General Secretary), to the directors of the responding financial departments and to the people responsible for providing the requested data.

c) Effect of non-response errors on the produced statistics:

 Not applicable

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

 

a)       Data processing and editing processes:

 Data have been collected with Excel questionnaire in pre-specified format. Some processing was required in cases where data have been supplied in different formats.

b)      Description of errors:

No processing errors exist. 

c)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Not applicable.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Model assumption errors occur when the assumptions made for the estimation of parameters, models, the testing of statistical hypotheses, etc., are violated. As a result, the quality of the resulting statistics is affected (e.g. degrees of confidence might be inflated).

Description/assessment: 


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Date of first release of national data:

Provisional budget data released and transmitted to Eurostat:  T+6 months (i.e., June) 

Final budget data released and transmitted to Eurostat: T+12 months (i.e., December)

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Date of first release of national data:

 

Final budget data are released twelve months after the end of reference year (e.g. final budget data for year 2021 were released in December 2022, that is T+12).     

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 6 12
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  6  12
Delay (days)   0 - no delay  0 - no delay
Reasoning for delay  not applicable  not applicable


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Regulation No 2020/1197, Frascati manual and the EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issue Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Research and development FM2015 Chapter 2 (mainly paragraphs 2.3 and 2.4).  NO  
Coverage of levels of government FM2015, §12.5 to 12.9 NO   
Socioeconomic objectives coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20 NO   
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20     
15.1.3. Deviations from recommendations

GBARD encompass all spending allocations met from sources of government revenue foreseen within the budget, such as taxation. Spending allocations by extra-budgetary government entities are within the scope only to the extent that their funds are allocated through the budgetary process (FM2015 §12.9). The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national GBARD statistics.

 

Methodological issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations  National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Definition of GBARD FM § 12.9    GBARD covers the two flows/chapters of the Greek government budget:

•             Ordinary budget,

•             Investment budget 

Ordinary budget provides mainly the institutional funding which is allocated to institutes of the public sector (including universities as well as institutions located abroad e.g. CERN). Investment budget provides funding in the form of projects/programmes allocated to both public and private institutes (project funding). 

Stages of data collection FM2015 §12.41  NO  
Gross / net approach, net principle FM2015 §12.20 and 12.21    Gross approach – inclusion of the EU support funds.
EU/other funds Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics    Greece is a net beneficiary of EU support. Thus, since 1995 the whole budget of the structural funds coming from the EU (under the Community Support Framework 2000-2006 and the subsequent ESPA initiatives e.g. National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013, Partnership Agreement 2014-2020 has been included in GBARD. More precisely since 1995 the EU contribution to the structural funds is added to the respective Greek funds in the chapter Public Investment Budget of the government budget. 
Types of expenditure FM2015 §12.15 to 12.18    Both current costs and capital expenditure are covered.
Current and capital expenditure FM §12.15    GBARD include both current and capital expenditure. 
Extra budgetary funds FM §12.8, 12.20, 12.38    Extra budgetary funds are excluded.
Loans FM §12.31, 12.32, 12.34    Until now we have not dealt with such a case. 
Indirect funding, tax rebates, etc. FM §12.31 - 12.38  NO   Indirect funding (tax rebates, …) is excluded. 
Treatment of multi-annual projects FM2015 §12.44  NO   Multi-annual projects are allocated to the GBARD of the year(s) in which they are budgeted
Treatment of GBARD going to R&D abroad FM2015 §12.19  NO   GBARD covers the national contribution (part of the Ordinary Budget) to R&D performed abroad: European Organizations (European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), European Molecular Biology Conference (EMBC), CERN, European Space Foundation (ESF), European Space Agency (ESA)
Criterion for distribution by socioeconomic objective FM2015 §12.50 to 12.71  NO   Purpose in both cases of institutional and project level distribution
Method of identification of primary objective Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics, topic 2, statement B.6  NO   Both direct derivation and indirect spin-off approach. 
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
Provisional data  12 consequent years, starting from 2008  2008, 2004, 1995, 1989, 1984, 1983    2008: Revision in methodology. GBARD data (appropriations) are collected exclusively from funders.

One more element to consider when analysing the Greek GBARD time series is the backloading of multiannual projects financed from Structural Funds (largest part of the Investment Budget which is approximated by the project funding breakdown of GBARD). For example, during the implementation phase of the 3rd Community Support Framework (CSF), the largest amount of available funds was distributed towards the end period of the Framework. Therefore the peak in the overall GBARD figures for 2008 which is also reflected in the project funding breakdown. Moreover, years 2007 – 2008 were overlapping years of the 3rd CSF with the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSFR). The same pattern can be seen from 2013 and onwards. In 2013, GBARD figures and in particular the project funding part start to peak again, due to the contribution of NSRF,  despite the significant Ordinary Budget cuts which are reflected in the institutional funding part of the GBARD series.

Moreover, the NABS 10 chapter break in 2008 can be explained by the fact that archaeological and cultural R&D activities, which is the lion’s share of GBARD NABS 10 chapter, were previously undercovered and therefore underestimated. The adoption of the new NABS 2007 classification, which included as a separate chapter “Culture”, resulted in a better identification of R&D activities in this domain. Before 2007, NABS 1992 cultural activities were included under the heading Social structures and relations (Chapter 8.), and were therefore undercovered. 

2004:Research coefficients were revised for higher education, including GUF.
1995:In 1995, the whole budget of the structural funds coming from the EU (under the Community Support Framework and other community initiatives), the contribution of the EU included, has been added to GBARD. Research coefficients were revised for higher education, including GUF.
1989:research coefficients were revised for higher education, including GUF.
1984: In 1984 there was a break in series
1983:methodology for GBARD data was modified in order to improve international comparability. - Public enterprises are excluded (break in series); - Establishment of the "research coefficients” to evaluate the amounts in HE. General university funds are calculated from the "research coefficients" established on the basis of a survey of higher education institutions. The first survey for the estimation of these coefficients was done in 1983
Final data  12 consequent years, starting from 2008  2008, 2004, 1995, 1989, 1984, 1983   

2008: Revision in methodology. GBARD data (appropriations) are collected exclusively from funders.

One more element to consider when analysing the Greek GBARD time series is the backloading of multiannual projects financed from Structural Funds (largest part of the Investment Budget which is approximated by the project funding breakdown of GBARD). For example, during the implementation phase of the 3rd Community Support Framework (CSF), the largest amount of available funds was distributed towards the end period of the Framework. Therefore the peak in the overall GBARD figures for 2008 which is also reflected in the project funding breakdown. Moreover, years 2007 – 2008 were overlapping years of the 3rd CSF with the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSFR). In 2013, GBARD figures and in particular the project funding part start to peak again, due to the contribution of NSRF,  despite the significant Ordinary Budget cuts which are reflected in the institutional funding part of the GBARD series.

Moreover, the NABS 10 chapter break in 2008 can be explained by the fact that archaeological and cultural R&D activities, which is the lion’s share of GBARD NABS 10 chapter, were previously undercovered and therefore underestimated. The adoption of the new NABS 2007 classification, which included as a separate chapter “Culture”, resulted in a better identification of R&D activities in this domain. Before 2007, NABS 1992 cultural activities were included under the heading Social structures and relations (Chapter 8.), and were therefore undercovered.

2004:Research coefficients were revised for higher education, including GUF.
1995:In 1995, the whole budget of the structural funds coming from the EU (under the Community Support Framework and other community initiatives), the contribution of the EU included, has been added to GBARD. Research coefficients were revised for higher education, including GUF.
1989:research coefficients were revised for higher education, including GUF.
1984: In 1984 there was a break in series
1983:methodology for GBARD data was modified in order to improve international comparability. - Public enterprises are excluded (break in series); - Establishment of the "research coefficients” to evaluate the amounts in HE. General university funds are calculated from the "research coefficients" established on the basis of a survey of higher education institutions. The first survey for the estimation of these coefficients was done in 1983.

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

General differences are those outlined in the FM § 522 and 523.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.4. Coherence - internal

This part compares GBARD statistics from the provisional and final budget for the reference year.

15.4.1. Comparison between provisional and final data according to NABS 2007
  R&D allocations in the provisional budget delivered at T+6 R&D allocations in the final budget delivered at T+12 Difference (of final data)
Exploration and exploitation of the Earth  

32673.697 (thousand euro)

 32302.397 (thousand euro)  

-371.300 (thousand euro)

Environment  

59473.322 (thousand euro)

 54560.34 (thousand euro)  

-4912.982 (thousand euro)

Exploration and exploitation of space  

22006.432 (thousand euro)

 22006.684 (thousand euro)  

0.252 (thousand euro)

Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures  

145526.237 (thousand euro)

 137473.616 (thousand euro)  

-8052.621 (thousand euro)

Energy  

47011.146 (thousand euro)

 47355.756 (thousand euro)  

344.610 (thousand euro)

Industrial production and technology  

219614.248 (thousand euro)

 191586.069 (thousand euro)  

-28028.179 (thousand euro)

Health  

161703.885 (thousand euro)

 149631.901 (thousand euro)  

-12071.984 (thousand euro)

Agriculture  

56310.019 (thousand euro)

 51059.375 (thousand euro)  

-5250.644 (thousand euro)

Education  

16440.814 (thousand euro)

 17678.893 (thousand euro)  

1238.079 (thousand euro)

Culture, recreation, religion and mass media  

150110.206 (thousand euro)

 148993.809 (thousand euro)  

-1116.397 (thousand euro)

Political and social systems, structures and processes  

119146.508 (thousand euro)

 96962.409 (thousand euro)  

-22184.099 (thousand euro)

General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from General University Funds (GUF)  

496522.799 (thousand euro)

 509835.816 (thousand euro)  

13313.017 (thousand euro)

General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from other sources than GUF  

74260.986 (thousand euro)

 68199.69 (thousand euro)  

-6061.296 (thousand euro)

Defence  

22565.028 (thousand euro)

 22565.028 (thousand euro)  

0.000 (thousand euro)

TOTAL GBARD  

1623365.327 (thousand euro)

 1550211.783 (thousand euro)  

-73153.544 (thousand euro)


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  not separately available  no sub-contracting
Data collection costs  not separately available  no sub-contracting
Other costs  not separately available  no sub-contracting
Total costs  not separately available  no sub-contracting
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  2.17 HC Average across responding units (data are collected via the questionnaire)
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  8.5 hours (in total for 2.17 HC on average) Average across responding units (data are collected via the questionnaire)
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C) not available not available 
Total cost not available not available 

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

No revisions are foreseen and/ or applied.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

a)       Provisional data:

 Survey to all funding authorities, at both central and regional level. In addition, text analysis is performed by EKT on administrative data retrieved from the central Special Service for the Monitoring Information System (M.I.S.) to identify any additional R&D projects not reported by the responding authorities. (MIS monitors ESPA e.g. all Operational and Regional Programs of the current Partnership Agreement for the Development Framework 2014-2020 as well as the preceding National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013. ESPA is the main component of Public Investment Budget.)  

b)      Final data:

 Survey to all funding authorities, at both central and regional level. In addition, text analysis is performed by EKT on administrative data retrieved from the central Special Service for the Monitoring Information System (M.I.S.) to identify any additional R&D projects not reported by the responding authorities. (MIS monitors ESPA e.g. all Operational and Regional Programs of the current Partnership Agreement for the Development Framework 2014-2020 as well as the preceding National Strategic Reference Framework 2007-2013. ESPA is the main component of Public Investment Budget.) 

c)       General University Funds (GUF):

Application of R&D coefficients on Universities funding administrative data provided by the Ministry of Education.      

18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
  Provisional data Final data Comments
Data collection method  

Direct data collection through:

 - survey of public funding authorities, at both central and regional level, (as direct collection and primary source)

- government budget analysis (text analysis) by EKT for validation and cross-checking purposes

 -administrative data for calculation of GUF and certain components of Ordinary Budget  
 

Direct data collection through:

 - survey of public funding authorities, at both central and regional level, (as direct collection and primary source)

- government budget analysis (text analysis) by EKT for validation and cross-checking purposes

 -administrative data for calculation of GUF and certain components of Ordinary Budget  

 
Stage of data collection  Initial budget appropriations (figures as voted by the legislature for the coming year, including changes introduced
in the parliamentary debate)
 Final budget appropriations (figures as voted by the parliament for the coming year, including additional votes during the year).

In some exclusive cases (investment budget for the General Secretariat for Research and Innovation),  actual expenditures (money paid out during the year) have been taken into consideration and reported.

 
Reporting units   Funding/administering institutions(ministries, general secretariats, regions)   Funding/administering institutions(ministries, general secretariats, regions)   
Basic variable  Initial budget allocations have been collected for year 2021  Final budget allocations have been collected for year 2021  Regarding Final data some of the reporting units had difficulties to retrieve appropriations from their archives and therefore provided outlays. 
Time of data collection (T+x)1)    Before 2008 it was T+12
2008:T+46
2009: T+34
2010: T+22
2011 onwards: T+10 
 
Problems in the translation of budget items  

1) Time of data collection (T+x): T is assumed to represent the end of reference period. x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is collected.

18.3.2. General University Funds (GUF)

Not applicable.

18.3.3. Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO)
Level of distribution of budgetary items – institution or programme/project  

Budgetary items of the Ordinary budget are distributed at institutional level.

Budgetary items of the Investment budget are distributed at project level. 
Criterion of distribution – purpose or content  Purpose in both cases of institutional and project level distribution. 
Method of identification of primary objectives  Both direct derivation and indirect spin-off approach. 
Difficulties of distribution  Central Government authorities do not use the NABS classification in their budget’ functions.
Therefore, the distribution of GBARD into NABS objectives is not always straightforward. In such cases, mostly reported when distributing the ordinary (institutional) R&D, reporting units are consulting the performing institutions about splitting their R&D budgets into objectives. 
18.3.4. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  not available
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  EL_Questionnaire_GBARD_2020_2021.xls (available in Greek)
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  not available
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  The production of GBARD statistics follows the Frascati Manual 2015 concepts, definitions and methodology as well as Eurostat "FM2015 Implementation, Harmonisation EU Guidelines" as updated. A detailed handbook on GBARD collection processes has been developed (internal) and is continuously enriched and improved. National metadata (in Greek) are made available to all users in the dedicated EKT website. https://metrics.ekt.gr/sites/metrics-ekt/files/pages-pdf/EKT_SIMS_GBARDstatistics_el.pdf
18.4. Data validation

EKT has followed specific procedures for the validation of the output data. Validation activities include:

•          Comparison of the 2021 data with previous years of GBARD statistics

•          Performing micro data editing. EKT performed validation for each one questionnaire received by a funding authority based on its answers in previous rounds. Where an inconsistency was identified, EKT communicated with the respective funding authorities and the micro data were edited and corrected.

•          Confronting GBARD statistics against other relevant data (direct RD survey for RD performers with the reference year: 2021)

•          Verifying the GBARD statistics based on the secondary data EKT collects from various sources (e.g. Data from the Monitoring Information System (M.I.S.) of the Hellenic Ministry of Development and Investments)  

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

No imputation

18.5.2. Data compilation methods

See below.

18.5.2.1. Identifying R&D
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D  Separation of R&D from non-R&D is done by the reporting units following the recommendations of EKT in line with the Frascati Manual recommendations. Regarding the Ordinary budget, which covers mainly institutional funding, a distinction was recommended to be made between the ‘core R&D institutions’ having R&D as their main activity and the ‘other institutions’ where R&D is part of their activities. Ministries have applied their own coefficients for the ‘other institutions’ mostly after consultation with EKT and with the institutions. EKT has applied coefficients to derive GUF (see 20.5.2) based on the results of time-use survey performed by EKT on HES personnel in 2015 with reference year 2014. In what regards the Investment budget, which covers exclusively programme funding, the identification of R&D projects are made by the reporting units based on the purpose of the funded projects. 
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  
Coefficient estimation method  Coefficients, when applied to distinguish ‘R&D’ from ‘other’ institutes, are applied by the reporting unit mostly after consultation with EKT and institutions. 
Frequency of updating of coefficients  The coefficients applied by the reporting units can be revised every year if the unit considers this is a necessity. 
18.5.2.2. General University Funds (GUF)
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D  GUF are produced by the application of R&D coefficients on administrative data regarding the funding of higher education institutions as provided by the Ministry of Education. The coefficients used for the distinction between R&D and non-R&D activities based on the results of time-use survey performed by EKT on HES personnel in 2020 with reference year 2019 according to Frascati manual instructions.
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  
Coefficient estimation method  The coefficients used are based on the results of the time-use survey performed by EKT on HES personnel in 2020 with reference year 2019 according to Frascati manual instructions.
Frequency of updating of coefficients  The coefficients are being updated every five years.
18.5.2.3. Other issues
Treatment of multi-annual programmes  In line with the Frascati recommendation (FM§ 495), multi-annual projects are allocated to the GBARD of the year(s) in which they are budgeted. Neither in the year(s) of performance nor in the year of authorization. 
Possibility to classify budgetary items by COFOG functions  This allocation has never been made before. We could possibly consider classifying budgetary items by COFOG (top level) since the reporting units are mainly ministries that reflect government structure and functions. 
Possibility to classify budgetary items by other nomenclatures e.g. NACE  Classification into institutional and project funding as proposed by the new Regulation.
Method of estimation of future budgets   Not applicable
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
GBARD questionnaire