1.1. Contact organisation
Environment and Resources Authority (ERA)
1.2. Contact organisation unit
Ambient Quality and Waste Unit
1.3. Contact name
Confidential because of GDPR
1.4. Contact person function
Confidential because of GDPR
1.5. Contact mail address
Environment and Resources Authoirty
Hexagon House,
Spencer Hill,
Marsa, MRS 1441,
Malta
1.6. Contact email address
Confidential because of GDPR
1.7. Contact phone number
Confidential because of GDPR
1.8. Contact fax number
Confidential because of GDPR
2.1. Metadata last certified
1 July 2025
2.2. Metadata last posted
1 July 2025
2.3. Metadata last update
1 July 2025
3.1. Data description
Malta compiles this report using a variety of data sources. Waste management facilities and waste brokers accepting, transferring, or exporting different packaging waste streams are required to submit annual reports to the competent authority. These reports must include data such as the quantities by EWC code, the origin of the waste, and its final destination. The submitted data is reviewed and cross-checked, including validation through the exports database held by the authority.
Additionally, annual reports from Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs) are a key source of information. These reports provide data on the quantities of packaging materials placed on the market by producers participating in the schemes, as well as the quantities of packaging waste collected through curbside and recycling point collection systems. The national register of producers placing packaging and packaging materials on the market also supports the data compilation process.
Malta reports in accordance with the new rules laid down in Article 6(a) to 6(d) of Commission Decision 2005/270 and according to the new format for reporting.
For this reporting cycle, Malta did not apply average loss rates. However, due to the absence of operational recycling facilities in Malta for plastic packaging, actual recycling rates were requested from facilities abroad. These rates were used to calculate the recycled amounts of plastic packaging waste. In cases where official recycling certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging.
3.1.1. Description of the parties involved in the data collection
Table : Institutions involved in the collection of data and distribution of tasks
| Name of institution | Description of key responsibilities |
|---|---|
| Environment and Resources Authority (ERA) | The ERA is the national regulator on the environment. It is responsible to collect annual environmental reports (AERs) from different waste management facilities (WMF), waste brokers, waste carriers, and authorised packaging waste recovery organisations, in order to compile figures for reporting. Moreover, the ERA is the Authority that holds the register of the producers placing packaging and packaging material on the national market. In addition, the ERA also keeps datasets for TFS exports and "green-listed" non-hazardous wastes from Malta. ERA is also the entity responsible of submitting official statistics on packaging and packaging waste to Eurostat. |
| Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations (PROs) | Fulfills the responsibilities of publishing data and reporting obligations on behalf of producers placing packaging and packaging material on the national market. During this reference year, the PROs are also responsible for the kerbside collection of recyclables and, responsible for the management of recycling points in the Maltese Islands. |
| Self Compliant Producers | Fulfills the responsibilities of reporting obligations of transport packaging and packaging material placed on the national market. This information is to be reported to the Authority on an annual basis. |
| Authorised Waste Brokers | Required to submit Annual Environment Reports (AERs) to the Competent Authority (ERA) indicating the amount of waste received by a facility, transferred, exported, the final treatment operation and final destination. |
| Permitted Waste Management Facilities (WMFs) | Required to submit AERs to the Competent Authority indicating monthly inputs and outputs per EWC code together with the origin and fate of the waste. |
3.2. Classification system
R/D codes from Annexes I and II of Directive 2008/98/EC are the only ones used to describe the treatment operation.
3.2.1. Classification of treatment operations
R/D codes from Annexes I and II of Directive 2008/98/EC are the only ones used to describe the treatment operation.
3.3. Coverage - sector
Since the register of producers of packaging and packaging material placed on the national market does not cover the whole market, estimates are carried out in order to determine the amount of packaging waste generated from free-riders, producers exempt through the de minimis clause, e-commerce and possible under declarations. To determine this difference in the generation of packaging waste, Malta makes use of a statistical model which takes into account estimations of the packaging waste generated from the above-mentioned sources.
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions
Not applicable, no wooden packaging repaired for reuse was recorded.
Not applicable, metals in incineration bottom ash (IBA) was not recorded.
3.4.1. Types of reuse system in place for each material type
Several of Malta's main producers placing glass beverage bottles on the Maltese market have set a deposit refund scheme to collect glass bottles for reuse .Under this scheme, customers are charged a refundable deposit for each returnable bottle purchased, and is reimbursed entirely when the empty bottle is returned back. The producer then collects these empty bottles to reuse them for multiplecycles until the end of their lifespan.
3.4.2. Other recovery of waste
Not applicable, no other recovery was recorded.
3.4.3. Information on temporary storage of packaging waste
Authorised waste management facilities are permitted to temporarily store waste, including packaging waste. As a reporting obligation, WMF are required to report their inputs and outputs according to EWC code, together with their opening (stored on site from previous year) and closing stock (stored on site at the end of the reference year).
The below information was obtained by a direct reading reported in the Annual Environmental Reports submitted by the waste management facilities (WMF):
- Packaging waste kept in storage at end of year 2022 (in tonnes): Glass: 547t;
- Metal: 354t; Plastic: 17t; PP&CB: 677t;
- Wood: 6t;
- Mixed Packaging: 910t; Composite Packaging: 50t.
Packaging waste kept in storage at the end of year 2023 (in tonnes):
- Glass:1064.223t
- Metal:19.142t
- Plastic:811.455t
- PP&CB:1102.926t
- Wood:300t
- Mixed Packaging: 150t
3.5. Statistical unit
Malta uses multiple data sources to compile this report. Waste management facilities and waste brokers accepting, transferring and exporting different packaging waste streams are required to submit annual reports to the ERA documenting their data (including quantities by EWC code, origin of waste and its destination). Moreover, annual reports submitted by Producer Responsibilty Organisations serve as an important data source to this report. From these reports, data on the quantities of packaging material and packaging placed on the market by the producers who participate in the schemes and, quantities of packaging waste collected from curbside collection and recycling points collection system in local councils are gathered. Furthermore, the register of producers placing on the national market packaging and packaging material is also a useful source when compiling this report.
3.6. Statistical population
Packaging waste generated: all packaging waste generated is based on data reported by self-compliant producers and PROs. Since the register of producers of packaging and packaging material placed on the national market does not cover the whole market, estimates through a statistical model are carried out to determine the amount of packaging waste generated from free-riders, producers exempt through the de minimis clause, e-commerce and possible under declarations.
Packaging waste treated: given that Malta relies on the export of waste for recovery, the amounts of packaging waste recycled and recovered are based on the amount exported for such treatment. All exports of packaging waste are reported to the ERA and this data is then used to calculate the amount of packaging waste recycled or recovered.
The amount of packaging waste generation and treated refer to the total amount of packaging waste generated and treated in the whole of Malta.
3.7. Reference area
All data is at the national level.
3.8. Coverage - Time
The data is for reference year 2023
3.9. Base period
Not applicable
Tonnes
Calendar year
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements
S.L. 549.43 Waste Management (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations;
S.L. 549.141 Extended Producer Responsibility Framework Regulations.
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing
Producers Responsibility Organisations and self-compliant producers placing packaging or packaging material on the national market are obliged to use the service of an Auditor, approved by ERA, to certify that all the information reported is in conformity with the obligations set in the relevant legislation.
Waste management facilities and waste brokers are required to submit an audited annual environment report to the ERA, in formats established by the ERA, indicating the amounts of waste received, exported, the final treatment operation and the final destination.
7.1. Confidentiality - policy
All data which is reported under the WASTE_PACKDAT_A is not directly traceable to any particular economic operator, and so confidentiality requirements do not apply.
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment
All data which is reported under the WASTE_PACKDAT_A is not directly traceable to any particular economic operator, and so confidentiality requirements do not apply.
8.1. Release calendar
Currently the ERA does not publish any release calendar.
8.2. Release calendar access
Currently the ERA does not publish any release calendar.
8.3. Release policy - user access
Currently the ERA does not publish any release calendar.
Data is disseminated 18 months after the end of each reference year.
10.1. Dissemination format - News release
Not applicable, the ERA does not issue a news release.
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications
Not applicable, the ERA does not issue publications.
10.3. Dissemination format - online database
Not applicable, the ERA does not publish online databases.
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access
Not applicable, the ERA does not publish microdata access.
10.5. Dissemination format - other
Not applicable, the ERA does not publish other forms of dissemination. However, data is provided upon requests.
10.6. Documentation on methodology
Packaging waste statistics are produced in line with the Guidance for the compilation and reporting of data on packaging and packaging waste according to Decision 2005/270/EC.
10.7. Quality management - documentation
Each reported dataset under Decision 2005/270/EC is accompanied with a quality report.
11.1. Quality assurance
This quality report describes the sources and methods that are used by the ERA to generate the required statistics. Various data sources, namely PROs, self-compliant producers, waste management facilities and waste brokers are used to compile this report. Cross-checks between different data sources are carried out by the ERA to verify traceability to eliminate double counting and ensure accuracy of the reported data.
11.2. Quality management - assessment
Verifications are carried out by the ERA by cross-checking the information submitted by economic operators to other data sources, including audited reports submitted by the PROs, self-compliant producers and waste management facilities. These verification processes allow the ERA to report accurate and reliable data.
12.1. Relevance - User Needs
These statistics are primarily compiled in fulfilment of the reporting obligations under Directive 94/62/EC.
However, reported data is shared with the general public upon request to the ERA.
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction
No measures are in place to determine user satisfaction.
12.3. Completeness
All mandatory data is reported.
13.1. Accuracy - overall
Since the register of producers of packaging and packaging material placed on the national market does not cover the whole market, assumptions are taken in order to determine the amount of packaging waste generated from free-riders, producers exempt through the de minimis clause, e-commerce and possible under declarations. To determine this difference in the generation of packaging waste, Malta makes use of a statistical model which takes into account estimations of the packaging waste generated from the above-mentioned sources.
Furthermore, for the purpose of this report, ALR were not applied however the amount recycled is based on sorted waste exported to the recycling facility. Having said so, for plastic packaging waste, Malta requested actual recycling rates from recycling facilities abroad, since no recycling facilities are operational in Malta. These recycling rates were then applied to determine the amount of plastic packaging waste recycled. Where such certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging.
13.1.1. Statistical surveys used regarding packaging waste generation and treatment
The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in previous questions.
| Component of packaging waste | Year | Statistical units | Percentage of population surveyed | Data (tonnes) | Confidence level | Error margin | Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year | Other details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. | Not applicable since statistical surveys are not used to determine waste generation. |
13.1.2. Statistical surveys used regarding reusable packaging
The information in this section is to provide an overarching understanding of the accuracy of any statistical surveys used relating to packaging waste. Some of the information may be available in other concepts.
| Packaging material | Year | Statistical units | Percentage of population surveyed | Data (tonnes) | Confidence level | Error margin | Details of adjustments from the survey year to the current year | Other details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging | Not applicable since no statistical surveys are used regarding reusable packaging |
13.2. Sampling error
Not applicable, since no sampling was required.
13.3. Non-sampling error
Not applicable, since no sampling was required.
14.1. Timeliness
Economic operators are required to submit their annual report by the 4th month after the end of the reference year. The submitted data is then verified by the ERA with the aim to compile the packaging and packaging waste report. Data is reported to Eurostat 18 months after the end of each reference year.
14.2. Punctuality
Data is reported to Eurostat 18 months after the end of each reference year.
15.1. Comparability - geographical
Not applicable
15.2. Comparability - over time
There were no changes in the calculation method for the reported data on waste treatment when comparing the current reference year with reference year 2022.
15.3. Coherence - cross domain
Not applicable.
15.4. Coherence - internal
The data are internally coherent.
15.4.1. Explanation for any component with a greater than 10 % variation
Explanation detailing the causes of the tonnage difference (in relation to which waste streams, sectors or estimates have caused the difference, and what the underlying cause is) for any component of packaging waste generated and recycled which shows greater than a 10 % variation from the data submitted for the previous data year.
| Material | Variation (%) | Main reason for variation |
|---|---|---|
| Metal (Waste Generation) | 42% | According to the register of producers, POM for metal packaging and/or packaging material for 2023 increased when compared to 2022 POM for the same material. This means that producers placed more metal packaging material on the national market in 2023 when compared to 2022. |
| Metal (Recycled) | 65% | Malta depends on exports for the recycling of metal packaging waste. Malta has implemented several initiatives aimed at improving waste management across the island. In November 2022, the Beverage Container Refund Scheme (BCRS) was introduced to promote recycling by applying a refundable deposit on single-use beverage containers made of plastic, metal, or glass. Moreover, as from 1ST January 2023, Malta implemented the regionalisation reform, whereby collection of waste is organised at regional level with the aim to improve economies of scale and collection standards. To complement this, in April 2023, the mandatory separation of waste was enacted through the publication of two legal notices. This applies to all sectors, including households, businesses, governmental and non-governmental entities. Educational campaigns were conducted to inform the public of the updated national waste collection schedule, which was harmonised across the entire country. Enforcement measures, including warnings and fines, were introduced and are still applicable to individuals found to be non-compliant with proper waste disposal practices. Additionally, as of January 2023, new gate fees were introduced for commercial waste. These fees are designed to incentivise proper waste separation my making it more cost-effective to dispose of clean and sorted waste. |
| Glass (Waste Generated) | 10% | According to the register of producers, POM for glass packaging and/or packaging material for 2023 slightly increased when compared to 2022 POM for the same material. This means that producers placed slightly more glass packaging material on the national market in 2023 when compared to 2022. |
| Glass (Recycled) | 66% | Malta depends on exports for the recycling of glass packaging waste. Malta has implemented several initiatives aimed at improving waste management across the island. In November 2022, the Beverage Container Refund Scheme (BCRS) was introduced to promote recycling by applying a refundable deposit on single-use beverage containers made of plastic, metal, or glass. Consumers reclaim their deposit by returning the empty containers at designated reverse vending machines or collection points located around the country. Moreover, as from 1ST January 2023, Malta implemented the regionalisation reform, whereby collection of waste is originated at regional level with the aim to improve economies of scale and collection standards. To complement this, in April 2023, the mandatory separation of waste was enacted through the publication of two legal notices. This applies to all sectors, including households, businesses, governmental and non-governmental entities. Educational campaigns were conducted to inform the public of the updated national waste collection schedule, which was harmonised across the entire country. Enforcement measures, including warnings and fines, were introduced and are still applicable to individuals found to be non-compliant with proper waste disposal practices. Additionally, as of January 2023, new gate fees were introduced for commercial waste. These fees are designed to incentivise proper waste separation my making it more cost-effective to dispose of clean and sorted waste. |
| Paper & Cardboard (Recycled) | 27% | Malta depends on exports for the recycling of paper and cardboard packaging waste. As from 1st January 2023, Malta implemented the regionalisation reform, whereby collection of waste is originated at regional level with the aim to improve economies of scale and collection standards. To complement this, in April 2023, the mandatory separation of waste was enacted through the publication of two legal notices. This applies to all sectors, including households, businesses, governmental and non-governmental entities. Educational campaigns were conducted to inform the public of the updated national waste collection schedule, which was harmonised across the entire country. Enforcement measures, including warnings and fines, were introduced and are still applicable to individuals found to be non-compliant with proper waste disposal practices. Additionally, as of January 2023, new gate fees were introduced for commercial waste. These fees are designed to incentivise proper waste separation my making it more cost-effective to dispose of clean and sorted waste. |
| Wood (Waste Generation) | 29% | According to the register of producers, POM for wood packaging and/or packaging material for 2023 decreased when compared to 2022 POM for the same material. This means that producers placed more wood packaging material on the national market in 2022 when compared to 2023. |
| Plastic (Waste Generated) | 16% | According to the register of producers, POM for plastic packaging and/or packaging material for 2023 increased when compared to 2022 POM for the same material. This means that producers placed more plastic packaging material on the national market in 2023 when compared to 2022. |
| Plastic (Recycled) | 152% | Malta depends on exports for the recycling of plastic packaging waste. Malta has implemented several initiatives aimed at improving waste management across the island. In November 2022, the Beverage Container Refund Scheme (BCRS) was introduced to promote recycling by applying a refundable deposit on single-use beverage containers made of plastic, metal, or glass. Consumers reclaim their deposit by returning the empty containers at designated reverse vending machines or collection points located around the country. Moreover, as from 1ST January 2023, Malta implemented the regionalisation reform, whereby collection of waste is originated at regional level with the aim to improve economies of scale and collection standards. To complement this, in April 2023, the mandatory separation of waste was enacted through the publication of two legal notices. This applies to all sectors, including households, businesses, governmental and non-governmental entities. Educational campaigns were conducted to inform the public of the updated national waste collection schedule, which was harmonised across the entire country. Enforcement measures, including warnings and fines, were introduced and are still applicable to individuals found to be non-compliant with proper waste disposal practices. Additionally, as of January 2023, new gate fees were introduced for commercial waste. These fees are designed to incentivise proper waste separation my making it more cost-effective to dispose of clean and sorted waste. |
Not applicable.
17.1. Data revision - policy
Not applicable.
17.2. Data revision - practice
Data revisions are carried out only when required.
18.1. Source data
Malta uses multiple sources to compile this report. Waste management facilities and waste brokers accepting, transferring and exporting different packaging waste streams are required to submit on annual basis audited reports to the ERA documenting their data (including quantities by EWC code, origin of waste and its destination). Such reports are reviewed, cross-checked and are further validated by looking at the exports database. Moreover, annual reports submitted by Producer Responsibilty Organisations play an important data source to this report. From the latter reports, data on; quantities of packaging material and packaging placed on the market by the producers who participate in the schemes and, quantities of packaging waste collected from kerbsite collection and recycling points collection system in local councils are gathered. Furthermore, the register of producers placing on the national market packaging and packaging material is also a useful source when compiling this report.
18.1.1. Waste samples from waste analysis
Not applicable, since Malta uses the put on the market based on EPR approach (Approach 1) to estimate the amount of packaging waste generated.
18.1.2. Source of waste flow data for estimation
Not applicable, since Malta uses the put on the market based on EPR approach (Approach 1) to estimate the amount of packaging waste generated.
18.2. Frequency of data collection
Data is collected on an annual basis.
18.3. Data collection
All relevant economic operators, including PROs, self-compliant producers, waste management facilities and waste brokers are required to report to the ERA on an annual basis.
18.3.1. Description of the methodology and verification of data on packaging waste generated in case waste analysis is used
Not applicable, since Malta uses the put on the market based on EPR approach (Approach 1) to estimate the amount of packaging waste generated.
18.3.2. Description of the methodology to report on composite packaging
In cases where composite packaging is composed of a predominate material constituting more than 95%, this is reported under the predominant material. On the other hand, in cases two material account to more than 5% of the composite packaging, these are reported under the respective materials.
18.3.3. Description of methods for determining packaging waste treatment
| Packaging waste material | Total | Plastic | Wood | Ferrous metals | Aluminium | Glass | Paper and Cardboard | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data collection methods | ||||||||
| Administrative reporting | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Surveys | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Electronic registry | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Waste analysis | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Data from waste operators | Yes | Yes |
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Data from municipalities | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Data from extended producer responsibility schemes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Other | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Additional information about the methodology, including the combination of methods used:
The same methodology is applied to all packaging waste streams.
Audited Annual Environmental Reports and Waste Broker Reports submitted annually by waste management facilities and waste brokers respectively include data for each waste stream exported from Malta. When the EWC code and description indicate that the shipment does not constitute as packaging, the latter is not taken into consideration for the compilation of this report. Moreover, documentation is submitted to the ERA with information on the material, its quantity and type of treatment it is to undergo.
18.3.4. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on the generation and treatment of packaging waste
Not applicable, Malta does not make use of surveys to determine the amount of packaging waste generated and treated.
18.3.5. Explanation of the scope and validity of surveys to collect data on reusable packaging
Not applicable, Malta does not make use of surveys to determine the amount reusable packaging.
18.3.6. Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash
Calculation of recycling of metals from incinerator bottom ash : Detailed description of the method to collect data in order to calculate the amount of metals separated from incineration bottom ash in accordance with the Commission Implementing Act adopted in accordance with Article 37(7) of Directive 2008/98/EC.
| Data | Description of the measurement method to obtain the data |
|---|---|
| Total amount of metal concentrate extracted from incinerator bottom ash | Not applicable. |
| Average level of metallic content in the total amount of metal concentrate, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken | Not applicable. |
| Proportion of waste entering incineration plants that is packaging waste, including the reliability of any surveys undertaken | The amount of packaging waste entering incineration for energy recovery is estimated though characterization survey on RDF originating from the sorting of mixed recyclables. |
18.4. Data validation
Data submitted by economic operators follow a verification process by the ERA. Cross-checks amongst various datasets are carried out to ensure that entries of packaging waste only are taken into account and to eliminate double-counting. This ensures that non packaging waste is not taken into account for the calculation of the amount recycled and that the reported data is accurate and reliable.
18.4.1. Detailed description of the system for quality control and traceability for packaging waste pursuant to Article 6a(3) and (8) of Directive 94/62/EC
Producers Responsibility Organisations and self-compliant producers placing packaging or packaging material on the national market are obliged to use the service of an Auditor, approved by ERA, to certify that all the information reported is in conformity with the obligations set in the Waste Management (Packaging and Packaging Waste) Regulations (S.L.549.43). Producers shall ensure that a sound auditing procedure for traceability, monitoring and control is put into place.
Furthermore, prior to the actual shipments of non-hazardous waste, the notifier is required to submit to ERA, relevant documents (Annex VII), relevant processing fees and loading information amongst; waste type, detail of waste broker, date of loading, address of loading, container number and terminal of dispatch. ERA inspects the information provided including the material to be exported to check whether the documentation and loading are in-line with the requirements. If additional data/ information is required on any particular shipment, the exporter will be requested to provide such information/ documentation.
18.4.2. Traceability of waste treated outside the member State and ensuring its treatment in conditions broadly equivalent to the requirements of EU environmental law
| Packaging waste material | Subject to final treatment in the Member State (yes/no) | Shipped to another EU Member State (yes/no) | Exported outside the EU (yes/no) | Description of specific measures for quality control and traceability of packaging waste, in particularly as regards monitoring and validation of data |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic | No | Yes | Yes | Waste outputs from local sorting facilities are exported for further treatment. Verifications are carried out by cross-checking the information held by the Environment and Resources Authority. In this context, the audited AERs submitted by waste management facilities and waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and, data from PROs are used during the validation process to identify any inaccuracies in the data. For plastic packaging waste, Malta requested actual recycling rates from recycling facilities abroad, since no recycling facilities are operational in Malta. These recycling rates were then applied to determine the amount of plastic packaging waste recycled. Where such certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging. |
| Wood | No | Yes | Yes | Waste outputs from local sorting facilities are exported for further treatment. Verifications are carried out by cross-checking the information held by the Environment and Resources Authority. In this context, audited AERs submitted by waste management facilities and waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and, data from PROs are used during the validation process to identify any inaccuracies in the data. |
| Ferrous metals | No | Yes | Yes | Waste outputs from local sorting facilities are exported for further treatment. Verifications are carried out by cross-checking the information held by the Environment and Resources Authority. In this context, audited AERs submitted by waste management facilities and waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and, data from PROs are used during the validation process to identify any inaccuracies in the data. |
| Aluminium | No | Yes | Yes | Waste outputs from local sorting facilities are exported for further treatment. Verifications are carried out by cross-checking the information held by the Environment and Resources Authority. In this context, audited AERs submitted by waste management facilities and waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and, data from PROs are used during the validation process to identify any inaccuracies in the data. |
| Glass | No | Yes | Yes | Waste outputs from local sorting facilities are exported for further treatment. Verifications are carried out by cross-checking the information held by the Environment and Resources Authority. In this context, audited AERs submitted by waste management facilities and waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and, data from PROs are used during the validation process to identify any inaccuracies in the data. |
| Paper and cardboard | Yes | Yes | Yes | Waste outputs from local sorting facilities are exported for further treatment. Verifications are carried out by cross-checking the information held by the Environment and Resources Authority. In this context, audited AERs submitted by waste management facilities and waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and, data from PROs are used during the validation process to identify any inaccuracies in the data. |
| Others | No | Yes | Yes | Waste outputs from local sorting facilities are exported for further treatment. Verifications are carried out by cross-checking the information held by the Environment and Resources Authority. In this context, audited AERs submitted by waste management facilities and waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and, data from PROs are used during the validation process to identify any inaccuracies in the data. |
18.4.3. Description of measures to ensure broadly equivalent waste treatment
The data sources taken into consideration prior to exporting any shipment of waste are the following; - Document Annex VII on exports pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 on shipments of waste, confirming that shipment is considered not to pose any environmental risk when subject to transboundary movements and recovery in countries of import,
- Relevant processing fees and,
- Loading information including, waste type, detail of waste broker, data of loading, address of loading, container number and terminal of dispatch.
Furthermore, ERA inspects the information provided including the material to be exported to check whether the documentation and loading are in-line with the requirements. Export data is gathered through Annex VII, however if additional data/ information is required on any particular shipment, the exporter will be requested to provide such information/ documentation.
18.4.4. Verification of data on packaging waste generated
The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.
| Packaging waste material | Cross-check (yes/no) | Time-series check (yes/no) | Audit (yes/no) | Verification process | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic | Yes | Yes | Yes | The amount of packaging waste generated is based on audited data reported by PROs on behalf of their members and self-compliant producers. However such data is further cross-checked with data on packaging placed on the market held by the ERA in the register of producers. Furthermore, time-series crosscheks are carried out to identify any anomalies in the time series. | |
| Wood | Yes | Yes | Yes | The amount of packaging waste generated is based on audited data reported by PROs on behalf of their members and self-compliant producers. However such data is further cross-checked with data on packaging placed on the market held by the ERA in the register of producers. Furthermore, time-series crosscheks are carried out to identify any anomalies in the time series. | |
| Ferrous metals | Yes | Yes | Yes | The amount of packaging waste generated is based on audited data reported by PROs on behalf of their members and self-compliant producers. However such data is further cross-checked with data on packaging placed on the market held by the ERA in the register of producers. Furthermore, time-series crosscheks are carried out to identify any anomalies in the time series. | |
| Aluminium | Yes | Yes | Yes | The amount of packaging waste generated is based on audited data reported by PROs on behalf of their members and self-compliant producers. However such data is further cross-checked with data on packaging placed on the market held by the ERA in the register of producers. Furthermore, time-series crosscheks are carried out to identify any anomalies in the time series. | |
| Glass | Yes | Yes | Yes | The amount of packaging waste generated is based on audited data reported by PROs on behalf of their members and self-compliant producers. However such data is further cross-checked with data on packaging placed on the market held by the ERA in the register of producers. Furthermore, time-series crosscheks are carried out to identify any anomalies in the time series. | |
| Paper and cardboard | Yes | Yes | Yes | The amount of packaging waste generated is based on audited data reported by PROs on behalf of their members and self-compliant producers. However such data is further cross-checked with data on packaging placed on the market held by the ERA in the register of producers. Furthermore, time-series crosscheks are carried out to identify any anomalies in the time series. | |
| Others | Yes | Yes | Yes | The amount of packaging waste generated is based on audited data reported by PROs on behalf of their members and self-compliant producers. However such data is further cross-checked with data on packaging placed on the market held by the ERA in the register of producers. Furthermore, time-series crosscheks are carried out to identify any anomalies in the time series. | |
18.4.5. Verification of data on packaging waste recycling
The columns in the table relate to information on verification procedures used within the national statistical reporting system to validate the accuracy of the data.
| Packaging waste material | Cross-check (yes/no) | Time-series check (yes/no) | Audit (yes/no) | Verification process |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plastic | Yes | Yes | Yes | Plastic packaging entries were cross-checked with various reports. This was carried out to verify and trace the amounts of plastic waste recycled in the reference year. Datasets amongst the audited AERs as submitted by Waste Management Facilities, the broker reports and the 'green-listed' non-hazardous waste export dataset, were used to conduct such task. For plastic packaging waste, Malta requested actual recycling rates from recycling facilities abroad, since no recycling facilities are operational in Malta. These recycling rates were then applied to determine the amount of plastic packaging waste recycled. Where such certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging. |
| Wood | Yes | Yes | Yes | Wood packaging entries were cross-checked with various reports. This was carried out to verify and trace the amounts of wood waste recycled in reference year. Datasets amongst the audited AERs as submitted by Waste Management Facilities, the broker reports and the 'green-listed' non-hazarous waste export dataset, were used to conduct such task. |
| Ferrous metals | Yes | Yes | Yes | Metal packaging entries were cross-checked with various reports. This was carried out to verify and trace the amounts of metal waste recycled in the reference year. Datasets amongst the audited AERs as submitted by Waste Management Facilities, the broker reports ad the 'green-listed' non-hazardous waste export dataset, were used to conduct such task. |
| Aluminium | Yes | Yes | Yes | Metal packaging entries were cross-checked with various reports. This was carried out to verify and trace the amounts of metal waste recycled in the reference year. Datasets amongst the audited AERs as submitted by Waste Management Facilities, the broker reports ad the 'green-listed' non-hazardous waste export dataset, were used to conduct such task. |
| Mixed waste | No | No | No | No |
| Others | Yes | Yes | Yes | Entries under 'Other' were cross-checked with various reports. This was carried out to verify and trace the amount of 'Other' waste recycled (if any) in the reference year. Datasets amongst the audited AERs as submitted by Waste Management Facilities, the broker reports and the 'green-listed' non-hazardous waste export dataset, were used to conduct such task. |
18.5. Data compilation
The reported data are compiled by the ERA using data reported in the annual environmental reports submitted by the relevant economic operators in particular PROs, self-compliant producers, waste management facilities and waste brokers.
18.5.1. Methods for determining packaging waste generation
| Approach | % of waste generated based on this approach |
|---|---|
| Approach 1 Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR data, complemented with estimates to ensure full coverage of the EPR data |
70% |
| Approach 2 POM based on sources other than EPR (e.g. based on production and import statistics and factors to estimate the amount of packaging associated to these product flows) |
Not applicable |
| Approach 3 Waste analysis |
Not applicable |
| Other approaches : | 30%; MT uses an statistical model to estimate the total packaging waste generated by taking into account the packaging waste share in the municipal waste stream. An algorithm is carried out for each packaging waste stream to gross-up the packaging and packaging material declared by producers (POM), thus estimating packaging waste generated including data not captured by EPR data. |
18.5.1.1. Approach 1 - Put on the Market (POM) based on EPR
Primary sources and their shares in the total.
| Sources for calculation of PoM | % of packaging total covered | Threshold of this source(*) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Plastic | Wood | Ferrous metals | Aluminium | Glass | Paper and Cardboard | Other | ||
| EPR scheme data | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 70% | According to Regulation 2(3)(b) of S.L.549.43, producers placing less than 100kg on the market of packaging or packaging material in a calendar year are exempt from reporting their placement on the market. A registered producer placing less than 100kgs on the market shall inform the ERA as per Regulation 25(ii), providing a comminication which is issued and signed by any of the authorised signatories referred to in Schedule 13 of S.L.549.43. |
| Administrative reporting different from EPR | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Surveys | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Electronic registry: | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Other : | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | Not available |
(*) Necessity of a certain minimum amount of waste, turnover etc. to be registered
18.5.1.2. Approach 2 - Put on the market (POM) calculated from production and reign trade statistics and using coefficients of packaging for the sold goods in question
Not applicable, since Malta uses the put on the market based on EPR approach (Approach 1) to estimate the amount of packaging waste generated.
18.5.1.3. Approach 3 - Waste analysis
Not applicable, since Malta uses the put on the market based on EPR approach (Approach 1) to estimate the amount of packaging waste generated.
18.5.2. Information on estimates for packaging placed on the market
The methodology applied is based on two variables:
- The register of producers considering those producers for which data on packaging and packaging material placing on the national market is available for the years 2015 till 2021 held by ERA; and
- Amount of packaging from free riders, e-commerce and possible under declarations are estimated by determining the potential increase in generation of packaging waste within the municipal waste stream for the reference year when compared with previous reference years. An algorithm is carried out for each packaging waste stream, seeking grossing-up factors for the corresponding packaging material as declared by producers who register with the ERA for the reference year (refer to point 1).
18.5.3. Presence and calculation of estimates and indication of added volume in % of the total
| Packaging waste material | Total | Plastic | Wood | Ferrous metals | Aluminium | Glass | Paper and Cardboard | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Validation | ||||||||
| Corrections for underreporting of units covered by the above sources | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Estimates for units below the threshold (de minimis) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Estimates for other units legally exempt from reporting | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Estimates for freeriders | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Private imports /exports by private parcels | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Private imports /exports (from journeys) | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
| Internet imports and exports i.e. on-line sales | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Other corrections | Apart from the amount reported in the register of producers, the waste generation for every waste stream was calculated by adding an algorithm which was applied by using a statistical model so that free riders, e-commerce and producers placing less than 100kg of packaging on the market (de minimis) are estimated. Although estimates are being made, it is not possible to provide the share for de minimis threshold, freeriders etc, as the statistical model currently used provides these estimates collectively. | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Yes |
18.5.4. Measurement points for recycling applied
| Packaging waste material |
Description of measurement points used (at calculation point or at the output of sorting operation with subtraction of non-target materials as appropriate, end-of-waste criteria, etc.), including variation at regional and local level |
|---|---|
| Plastic | Malta relies on exports for the recycling of waste, hence, in most instances, the vast majority of the waste pre-treated locally is eventually exported for recycling. A verification process is carried out where information held by the ERA on waste exports and other datasets (i.e. AERs from waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and audtied data from Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations) are cross-checked. For plastic packaging waste, Malta requested actual recycling rates from recycling facilities abroad, since no recycling facilities are operational in Malta. These recycling rates were then applied to determine the amount of plastic packaging waste recycled. Where such certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging. |
| Wood | Malta relies on exports for the recycling of waste, hence, in most instances, the vast majority of the waste pre-treated locally is eventually exported for recycling. A verification process is carried out where information held by the ERA on waste exports and other datasets (i.e. AERs from waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and audited data from Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations) are cross-checked. |
| Ferrous metals | Malta relies on exports for the recycling of waste, hence, in most instances, the vast majority of the waste pre-treated locally is eventually exported for recycling. A verification process is carried out where information held by the ERA on waste exports and other datasets (i.e. AERs from waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and audited data from Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations) are cross-checked. |
| Aluminium | Malta relies on exports for the recycling of waste, hence, in most instances, the vast majority of the waste pre-treated locally is eventually exported for recycling. A verification process is carried out where information held by the ERA on waste exports and other datasets (i.e. AERs from waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and audited data from Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations) are cross-checked. |
| Glass | Malta relies on exports for the recycling of waste, hence, in most instances, the vast majority of the waste pre-treated locally is eventually exported for recycling. A verification process is carried out where information held by the ERA on waste exports and other datasets (i.e. AERs from waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and audited data from Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations) are cross-checked. |
| Paper and cardboard | Malta relies on exports for the recycling of waste, hence, in most instances, the vast majority of the waste pre-treated locally is eventually exported for recycling. A verification process is carried out where information held by the ERA on waste exports and other datasets (i.e. AERs from waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and audited data from Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations) are cross-checked. |
| Others | Malta relies on exports for the recycling of waste, hence, in most instances, the vast majority of the waste pre-treated locally is eventually exported for recycling. A verification process is carried out where information held by the ERA on waste exports and other datasets (i.e. AERs from waste brokers, internal databases on export of waste and audited data from Authorised Packaging Waste Recovery Organisations) are cross-checked. |
18.5.4.1. Detailed description of the methodology to calculate the amount of non-target materials removed between the measurement and the calculation points, where applicable
All export entries follow a verification process. Cross-checks amongst various datasets are carried out to consider packaging entries only and to eliminate double-counting. This ensures that non packaging waste is not taken into account for the calculation of the amount recycled. Having said so, for plastic packaging waste, Malta requested actual recycling rates from recycling facilities abroad, since no recycling facilities are operational in Malta. These recycling rates were then applied to determine the amount of plastic packaging waste recycled. Where such certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging.
18.5.4.2. Detailed description of how compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants has been identified and recorded in the data
Not applicable, no compostable packaging recovered at biowaste treatment plants was recorded during the reference year.
18.5.5. Methodology to determine recycled amounts from composite packaging or packaging composed of multiple materials
Upon export the waste operator is required to indicate the amount of each waste material exported to the recycling facility.
18.5.6. Use of Average Loss rates (ALRS)
Description of the sorted packaging waste to which ALRs are applied, types of sorting plants to which different ALRs apply, the methodological approach to calculating ALRs at such point(s), including the statistical accuracy of any surveys used, or the nature of any technical specifications.
| Sorted waste material and sorting plant type | ALR applied (in %) | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ALR were not applied however the amount recycled is based on sorted waste exported to the recycling facility. | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| Plastic packaging | Not available | For plastic packaging waste, actual recycling rates obtained from the abroad recycling facilities are applied on the amount exported for recycling. Where such certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging. |
18.6. Adjustment
Not applicable for this reference year.
18.6.1. Adjustment for impurities and humidity
Not applicable, since Malta uses the put on the market based on EPR approach (Approach 1) to estimate the amount of packaging waste generated.
| Factors | Total | Plastic | Wood | Ferrous metals | Aluminium | Glass | Paper and Cardboard | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correction factors for impurities and humidity in % of waste | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
| How the correction factors are derived | Not applicable | |||||||
| If no correction of impurities and humidity is applied, how they are accounted | Not applicable | |||||||
18.6.2. Attribution of waste to packaging and non-packaging types and correction for humidity
Description, where applicable, of the methodology to exclude non-packaging waste from the reported amount of recycled packaging waste and of the methodology to correct the amount of packaging waste at the measurement point in order to reflect the natural humidity rate of packaging (including by using relevant European standards). Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.
| Packaging waste material | Facility type | Share of packaging waste (%) | Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Malta is not in a position to provide this level of detail for this reference year. | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable |
18.6.3. Attribution of waste
Description of the methodology to exclude waste originating from other countries, where applicable. Aggregated data across facilities of a similar type is acceptable.
| Packaging waste material | Facility type | Share of waste from the Member State (%) | Description of the methodologies applied to obtain the percentage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable | Not applicable as no waste originating from other countries are recorded. |
Malta compiles this report using a variety of data sources. Waste management facilities and waste brokers accepting, transferring, or exporting different packaging waste streams are required to submit annual reports to the competent authority. These reports must include data such as the quantities by EWC code, the origin of the waste, and its final destination. The submitted data is reviewed and cross-checked, including validation through the exports database held by the authority.
Additionally, annual reports from Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs) are a key source of information. These reports provide data on the quantities of packaging materials placed on the market by producers participating in the schemes, as well as the quantities of packaging waste collected through curbside and recycling point collection systems. The national register of producers placing packaging and packaging materials on the market also supports the data compilation process.
Malta reports in accordance with the new rules laid down in Article 6(a) to 6(d) of Commission Decision 2005/270 and according to the new format for reporting.
For this reporting cycle, Malta did not apply average loss rates. However, due to the absence of operational recycling facilities in Malta for plastic packaging, actual recycling rates were requested from facilities abroad. These rates were used to calculate the recycled amounts of plastic packaging waste. In cases where official recycling certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging.
1 July 2025
Not applicable, no wooden packaging repaired for reuse was recorded.
Not applicable, metals in incineration bottom ash (IBA) was not recorded.
Malta uses multiple data sources to compile this report. Waste management facilities and waste brokers accepting, transferring and exporting different packaging waste streams are required to submit annual reports to the ERA documenting their data (including quantities by EWC code, origin of waste and its destination). Moreover, annual reports submitted by Producer Responsibilty Organisations serve as an important data source to this report. From these reports, data on the quantities of packaging material and packaging placed on the market by the producers who participate in the schemes and, quantities of packaging waste collected from curbside collection and recycling points collection system in local councils are gathered. Furthermore, the register of producers placing on the national market packaging and packaging material is also a useful source when compiling this report.
Packaging waste generated: all packaging waste generated is based on data reported by self-compliant producers and PROs. Since the register of producers of packaging and packaging material placed on the national market does not cover the whole market, estimates through a statistical model are carried out to determine the amount of packaging waste generated from free-riders, producers exempt through the de minimis clause, e-commerce and possible under declarations.
Packaging waste treated: given that Malta relies on the export of waste for recovery, the amounts of packaging waste recycled and recovered are based on the amount exported for such treatment. All exports of packaging waste are reported to the ERA and this data is then used to calculate the amount of packaging waste recycled or recovered.
The amount of packaging waste generation and treated refer to the total amount of packaging waste generated and treated in the whole of Malta.
All data is at the national level.
Calendar year
Since the register of producers of packaging and packaging material placed on the national market does not cover the whole market, assumptions are taken in order to determine the amount of packaging waste generated from free-riders, producers exempt through the de minimis clause, e-commerce and possible under declarations. To determine this difference in the generation of packaging waste, Malta makes use of a statistical model which takes into account estimations of the packaging waste generated from the above-mentioned sources.
Furthermore, for the purpose of this report, ALR were not applied however the amount recycled is based on sorted waste exported to the recycling facility. Having said so, for plastic packaging waste, Malta requested actual recycling rates from recycling facilities abroad, since no recycling facilities are operational in Malta. These recycling rates were then applied to determine the amount of plastic packaging waste recycled. Where such certificates were not available, Malta applied the EU average recycling rate for plastic packaging.
Tonnes
The reported data are compiled by the ERA using data reported in the annual environmental reports submitted by the relevant economic operators in particular PROs, self-compliant producers, waste management facilities and waste brokers.
Malta uses multiple sources to compile this report. Waste management facilities and waste brokers accepting, transferring and exporting different packaging waste streams are required to submit on annual basis audited reports to the ERA documenting their data (including quantities by EWC code, origin of waste and its destination). Such reports are reviewed, cross-checked and are further validated by looking at the exports database. Moreover, annual reports submitted by Producer Responsibilty Organisations play an important data source to this report. From the latter reports, data on; quantities of packaging material and packaging placed on the market by the producers who participate in the schemes and, quantities of packaging waste collected from kerbsite collection and recycling points collection system in local councils are gathered. Furthermore, the register of producers placing on the national market packaging and packaging material is also a useful source when compiling this report.
Data is disseminated 18 months after the end of each reference year.
Economic operators are required to submit their annual report by the 4th month after the end of the reference year. The submitted data is then verified by the ERA with the aim to compile the packaging and packaging waste report. Data is reported to Eurostat 18 months after the end of each reference year.
Not applicable
There were no changes in the calculation method for the reported data on waste treatment when comparing the current reference year with reference year 2022.
