Farm structure (ef)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: National Statistics Office (NSO)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

National Statistics Office (NSO)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Unit B3: Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries Statistics

1.5. Contact mail address

National Statistics Office (NSO), Unit B3: Environment, Agriculture and Fisheries Statistics, Lascaris, Valletta VLT2000, Malta


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 03/03/2022
2.2. Metadata last posted 03/03/2022
2.3. Metadata last update 03/03/2022


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The data describe the structure of agricultural holdings providing the general characteristics of farms and farmers and information on their land, livestock and labour force.  They also describe production methods, rural development measures and agro-environmental aspects that look at the impact of agriculture on the environment.

The data are used by public, researchers, farmers and policy-makers to better understand the state of the farming sector and the impact of agriculture on the environment. The data follow up the changes in the agricultural sector and provide a basis for decision-making in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and other European Union policies.

The statistical unit is the agricultural holding (farm). The aggregated results are disseminated through statistical tables. The data are presented at different geographical levels and over periods.
The data collections are organised in line with Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and have a new structure, consisting of a core data set and several modules. The regulation covers the data collections in 2020 (the agricultural census), 2023 and 2026. The data are as comparable and coherent as possible with the other European countries.

3.2. Classification system

Data are arranged in tables using many classifications. Please find below information on most classifications.

The classifications of variables are available in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The farm typology means a uniform classification of the holdings based on their type of farming and their economic size. Both are determined on the basis of the standard gross margin (SGM) (until 2007) or standard output (SO) (from 2010 onward) which is calculated for each crop and animal. The farm type is determined by the relative contribution of the different productions to the total standard gross margin or the standard output of the holding.

The territorial classification uses the NUTS classification to break down the regional data. The regional data is available at NUTS level 2.

3.3. Coverage - sector

The statistics cover agricultural holdings undertaking agricultural activities as listed in item 3.5 below and meeting the minimum coverage requirements (thresholds) as listed in item 3.6 below.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The list of core variables is set in Annex III of Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

The descriptions of the core variables as well as the lists and descriptions of the variables for the modules collected in 2020 are set in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874.

The following groups of variables are collected in 2020:

  • for core: location of the holding, legal personality of the holding, manager, type of tenure of the utilised agricultural area, variables of land, organic farming, irrigation on cultivated outdoor area, variables of livestock, organic production methods applied to animal production;
  • for the module "Labour force and other gainful activities": farm management, family labour force, non-family labour force, other gainful activities directly and not directly related to the agricultural holding;
  • for the module "Rural development": support received by agricultural holdings through various rural development measures;
  • for the module "Animal housing and rural development module":  animal housing, nutrient use and manure on the farm, manure application techniques, facilities for manure.
3.5. Statistical unit

See sub-category below.

3.5.1. Definition of agricultural holding

The agricultural holding is a single unit, both technically and economically, that has a single management and that undertakes economic activities in agriculture in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 belonging to groups:

- A.01.1: Growing of non-perennial crops

- A.01.2: Growing of perennial crops

- A.01.3: Plant propagation

- A.01.4: Animal production

- A.01.5: Mixed farming or

- The “maintenance of agricultural land in good agricultural and environmental condition” of group A.01.6 within the economic territory of the Union, either as its primary or secondary activity.

Regarding activities of class A.01.49, only the activities “Raising and breeding of semi-domesticated or other live animals” (with the exception of raising of insects) and “Bee-keeping and production of honey and beeswax” are included.

3.6. Statistical population

See sub-categories below.

3.6.1. Population covered by the core data sent to Eurostat (main frame and if applicable frame extension)

The thresholds of agricultural holdings are available in the annex.



Annexes:
3.6.1. Thresholds of agricultural holdings
3.6.1.1. Raised thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
No
3.6.1.2. Lowered and/or additional thresholds compared to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091
Yes
3.6.2. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the modules “Labour force and other gainful activities”, “Rural development” and “Machinery and equipment”

The same population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.1. 

The above answer holds for the modules ‘Labour force and other gainful activities’ and ‘Rural development’. The module ‘Machinery and equipment’ is not collected in 2020.

3.6.3. Population covered by the data sent to Eurostat for the module “Animal housing and manure management”

The subset of the population of agricultural holdings defined in item 3.6.2.

3.7. Reference area

See sub-categories below.

3.7.1. Geographical area covered

The entire territory of the country.

3.7.2. Inclusion of special territories

Not applicable.

3.7.3. Criteria used to establish the geographical location of the holding
The residence of the farmer (manager) not further than 5 km straight from the farm
3.7.4. Additional information reference area

Not available.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Farm structure statistics in our country cover the period from 2001 onwards. Older time series are described in the previous quality reports (national methodological reports).

3.9. Base period

The 2020 data are processed (by Eurostat) with 2017 standard output coefficients (calculated as a 5-year average of the period 2015-2019). For more information, you can consult the definition of the standard output.


4. Unit of measure Top

Two kinds of units are generally used:

  • the units of measurement for the variables (area in hectares, livestock in (1000) heads or LSU (livestock units), labour force in persons or AWU (annual working units), standard output in Euro, places for animal housing etc.) and
  • the number of agricultural holdings having these characteristics.


5. Reference Period Top

See sub-categories below.

5.1. Reference period for land variables

The use of land refers to the 12-month period ending on 31 August 2020. In the case of successive crops from the same piece of land, the land use refers to a crop that is harvested during the reference year, regardless of when the crop in question is sown. 

5.2. Reference period for variables on irrigation and soil management practices

The 12-month period ending on 31 August 2020 within the reference year 2020.

5.3. Reference day for variables on livestock and animal housing

The reference day 30 September 2020 within the reference year 2020.

5.4. Reference period for variables on manure management

The 12-month period ending on 30 September 2020. This period includes the reference day used for livestock and animal housing.

5.5. Reference period for variables on labour force

The 12-month period ending on 31 August 2020 within the reference year 2020.

5.6. Reference period for variables on rural development measures

The three-year period ending on 31 December 2020.

5.7. Reference day for all other variables

The reference day 30 September within the reference year 2020.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See sub-categories below.

6.1.1. National legal acts and other agreements
Legal act
6.1.2. Name of national legal acts and other agreements

Malta Statistics Authority Act 2000

6.1.3. Link to national legal acts and other agreements

https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/422/eng

6.1.4. Year of entry into force of national legal acts and other agreements

2000

6.1.5. Legal obligations for respondents
Yes
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

The Malta Statistics Authority Act gives power to the NSO to collect data from administrative sources. Besides, for the Census of Agriculture 2020, an agreement has been signed with the Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Animal rights (MAFA) to enable sharing of the microdata collected in the Census by NSO of those agricultural holdings that gave us such consent.  


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

All individual data collected during the IFS is strictly confidential. No data, which might single out individual information, may be published.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1. Aggregated data

See sub-categories below.

7.2.1.1. Rules used to identify confidential cells
No rules applied
7.2.1.2. Methods to protect data in confidential cells
No methods applied
7.2.1.3. Description of rules and methods

Not applicable.

7.2.2. Microdata

See sub-categories below.

7.2.2.1. Use of EU methodology for microdata dissemination
Yes
7.2.2.2. Methods of perturbation
Merging categories
7.2.2.3. Description of methodology

The methodology is described in the dedicated section of Eurostat's website: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/microdata.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

An advance release calendar is maintained by the NSO and published on the NSO website. The calendar projects three months of news releases (including the current and two subsequent months).

8.2. Release calendar access

https://nso.gov.mt/en/News_Releases/Release_Calendar/Pages/News-Release-Calendar.aspx

8.3. Release policy - user access

An internal policy on dissemination is in place to govern the dissemination of official statistics in an impartial, independent and timely manner, making them available simultaneously to all users. The NSO’s primary channel for the dissemination of official statistics is the NSO website. Tailored requests for statistical information may also be submitted through the NSO website.

8.3.1. Use of quality rating system
No
8.3.1.1. Description of the quality rating system

Not applicable.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

 Data on Integrated Farm Statistics is disseminated every 3-4 years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See sub-categories below.

10.1.1. Publication of news releases
Yes
10.1.2. Link to news releases

https://nso.gov.mt/census-of-agriculture-2020-main-findings/

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See sub-categories below.

10.2.1. Production of paper publications
No
10.2.2. Production of on-line publications
Yes, in English also
10.2.3. Title, publisher, year and link

Census of Agriculture – 2020 Report: https://nso.gov.mt/themes_publications/agricensus-2020/

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

See sub-categories below.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not available.

10.3.2. Accessibility of online database
No
10.3.3. Link to online database

Not applicable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See sub-category below.

10.4.1. Accessibility of microdata
Yes
10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

See sub-categories below.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.6.2. Availability of national reference metadata
No
10.6.3. Title, publisher, year and link to national reference metadata

Not available.

10.6.4. Availability of national handbook on methodology
No
10.6.5. Title, publisher, year and link to handbook

Not applicable.

10.6.6. Availability of national methodological papers
No
10.6.7. Title, publisher, year and link to methodological papers

Not applicable.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

SIMS reports related to the compilation of the FSS are available to the public on the NSO’s metadata website including concepts related to metadata and quality. A quality report is additionally sent to Eurostat. The NSO has developed an internal Quality Management Framework (QMF) which is built on common requirements of the ESS Code of Practice (ESS CoP). A document was prepared to include a set of general quality guidelines spanning overall statistical domains. Assuring methodological soundness is an integral part of the QMF, nonetheless, the document spans also other areas related to institutional aspects.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

See sub-categories below.

11.1.1. Quality management system
Yes
11.1.2. Quality assurance and assessment procedures
Use of best practices
Quality guidelines
Self-assessment
Peer review
11.1.3. Description of the quality management system and procedures

The NSO ensures the accuracy of data released to the public and prepares clear methodological notes which explain the processes involved in the collection and production of official statistics.

The NSO has developed an internal Quality Management Framework (QMF) which is built on common requirements of the ESS Code of Practice (ESS CoP). A document was prepared to include a set of general quality guidelines spanning over all statistical domains. Assuring methodological soundness is an integral part of the QMF, nonetheless, the document spans also on other areas related to institutional aspects.

Every five to seven years, the NSO participates in a Peer Review exercise through which the compliance of its operations with principles of the ESS CoP is assessed by an expert team. Peer Reviews are indeed part of the European Statistical System (ESS) strategy to implement the ESS CoP. Each NSI is expected to provide information as requested by a standard self-assessment questionnaire. Following this, an expert team visits the office to meet NSI representatives and main stakeholders. Peer Reviews result in a compliance report and the listing of a set of Improvement Actions that need to be followed up by the NSI. The next round of Peer Reviews is planned to be carried out in 2022.

11.1.4. Improvements in quality procedures

Not available.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not available.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The main user of the Census data is the Directorate for Agriculture within the Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Animal rights (MAFA). All the additional data that has been collected in the Census 2020, was the need of the Directorate for Agriculture. They needed such detailed data in order to help them to make further analysis targeting for example specific crops in specific areas and also to have a stock of the main machinery that is used in the local agriculture sector. Such information will help them to formulate better policies in the coming years.  

12.1.1. Main groups of variables collected only for national purposes

In the Census 2020, the following data has been collected for national purposes only:

- the percentage of the production that has been consumed by the agricultural holding's family members and the share that has been sold

- whether the agricultural holding has bought any land for agricultural purposes in the last 5 years. If yes, we asked for the amount of land and also the amount paid.

- whether the agricultural holding has sold any land for agricultural purposes in the last 5 years. If yes, we asked for the amount of land and also the amount paid.

- detailed data has been collected on each and every parcel of land.

- whether the manager is training someone that may be interested to take over once the manager retires. 

- information on agricultural machinery such as the number of tractors and small rotavators, water pumps, and plant protection application equipment.

12.1.2. Unmet user needs

All user needs were met.

12.1.3. Plans for satisfying unmet user needs

Not applicable.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

The last User Satisfaction Survey was held in 2014 with the aim to collect information about key users’ satisfaction with statistical output.

The NSO keeps a record of the number of News Releases and publications disseminated on its website; the users to whom statistical products are provided; as well as the number of requests that are processed every year.

News Releases and tailor-made statistical outputs were assessed on account of their quality, timeliness, and on their ability to meet users’ needs.

12.2.1. User satisfaction survey
Yes
12.2.2. Year of user satisfaction survey

2014

12.2.3. Satisfaction level
Satisfied
12.3. Completeness

Information on not collected, not-significant and not-existent variables is on  Eurostat's website.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable for Integrated Farm Statistics as the not collected variables, not-significant variables and not-existent variables are completed with 0.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

See categories below.

13.2. Sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable since we have conducted a census and not a sample survey.

13.2.2. Reasons for non-compliant precision requirements in relation to Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

Not applicable since we have conducted a census and not a sample survey.

13.2.3. Methodology used to calculate relative standard errors

Not applicable since we have conducted a census and not a sample survey.

13.2.4. Impact of sampling error on data quality
None
13.3. Non-sampling error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

The over-coverage rate is available in the annex. The over-coverage rate is unweighted.
The over-coverage rate is calculated as the share of ineligible holdings to the holdings designated for the core data collection. The ineligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status that are not imputed nor re-weighted for (therefore considered ineligible).
The over-coverage rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat. 



Annexes:
13.3.1.1 Over-coverage rate and Unit non-response rate
13.3.1.1.1. Types of holdings included in the frame but not belonging to the population of the core (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
Below thresholds during the reference period
13.3.1.1.2. Actions to minimize the over-coverage error
None
13.3.1.1.3. Additional information over-coverage error

Not available.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under-coverage error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.1.3.1. Under-coverage rate

A numeric rate is not available but we made our best to include every holding in the population frame by merging all the available registers available at our side and also the Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Animal rights (MAFA).

13.3.1.3.2. Types of holdings belonging to the population of the core but not included in the frame (main frame and if applicable frame extension)
None
13.3.1.3.3. Actions to minimise the under-coverage error

Prior to the census, we have merged all the available registers available at our side and also the Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Animal rights (MAFA).

13.3.1.3.4. Additional information under-coverage error

Not available.

13.3.1.4. Misclassification error
No
13.3.1.4.1. Actions to minimise the misclassification error

Not applicable since census has been conducted and not a sample survey.

13.3.1.5. Contact error
No
13.3.1.5.1. Actions to minimise the contact error

All the registers that been merged together prior to the census have been also merged with our population database to try to have the latest contact telephone number of the farmers.

13.3.1.6. Impact of coverage error on data quality
None
13.3.2. Measurement error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.2.1. List of variables mostly affected by measurement errors

A thorough check of completed questionnaires is an integral part of the processing system.  Data control started at the collection stage.  Since we have opted for the CAPI, we have included a number of in-built validations directly in the system. Besides, we have tested the system prior to the launch of the data collection. Apart from this, all interviewers were instructed to interview not more than five holdings and submit the data to be able to identify any mistakes undertaken during the interviewing stage.  This exercise helped the interviewer to reduce the number of errors in the remaining questionnaires.  Once the interviewers submitted the questionnaires through the system, a number of validations were run on the data and, in cases where information was not clear, the interviewer was contacted again to verify the data given by the farmer. In such instances, the interviewer could update the data and resend the respective questionnaire.

The above measures were taken in order to minimise as much as possible the measurement errors.  Basically, the following characteristics caused some measurement errors:

Male and female family persons working on the holding - FLF_D_RFAM_M_PC1T24, FLF_D_RFAM_M_PC25T49.......FLF_D_RFAM_F_PC100 - Respondents' inability to provide accurate answers

Non-family male and female persons regularly working on the holding - FLF_D_RNFAM_M_PC1T24, FLF_D_RNFAM_M_PC25T49......FLF_D_RNFAM_F_PC100 - Respondents' inability to provide accurate answers

13.3.2.2. Causes of measurement errors
Respondents’ inability to provide accurate answers
13.3.2.3. Actions to minimise the measurement error
Pre-testing questionnaire
Explanatory notes or handbooks for enumerators or respondents
Training of enumerators
13.3.2.4. Impact of measurement error on data quality
Low
13.3.2.5. Additional information measurement error

Not available.

13.3.3. Non response error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The unit non-response rate is in the annex of item 13.3.1.1. The unit non-response rate is unweighted.
The unit non-response rate is calculated as the share of eligible non-respondent holdings to the eligible holdings. The eligible holdings include those holdings with unknown eligibility status which are imputed or re-weighted for (therefore considered eligible).
The unit non-response rate is calculated over the holdings in the main frame and if applicable frame extension, for which core data are sent to Eurostat.

13.3.3.1.1. Reasons for unit non-response
Not applicable
13.3.3.1.2. Actions to minimise or address unit non-response
Follow-up interviews
Reminders
13.3.3.1.3. Unit non-response analysis

Not available.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

There were no partly completed questionnaires. The respondents are asked all the questions by the interviewers and they reply to every question.

13.3.3.2.1. Variables with the highest item non-response rate

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2.2. Reasons for item non-response
Not applicable
13.3.3.2.3. Actions to minimise or address item non-response
None
13.3.3.3. Impact of non-response error on data quality
None
13.3.3.4. Additional information non-response error

Not available.

13.3.4. Processing error

See sub-categories below.

13.3.4.1. Sources of processing errors
Data entry
13.3.4.2. Imputation methods
None
13.3.4.3. Actions to correct or minimise processing errors

When the data collected from the census resulted in discrepancies, the relevant participants were contacted again in order to confirm the data provided.

No processing errors were found as a result of thoroughly checking the data during the input stage and also through the inbuilt validations in the system.

13.3.4.4. Tools and staff authorised to make corrections

Interviewers were able to make corrections in the questionnaire directly on the tablet and insert a remark on the correction they were doing. Once the correction has been done, the interviewer submits the questionnaire again to the office. 

Besides, the interviewers, only the Head of Unit was able to do corrections on the data submitted by the interviewer during the validation stage. Once the staff finds a query, he clarifies with the interviewer/farmer and then provides the head of the unit with the updated data together with the reason and he personally updates the data in the database.

13.3.4.5. Impact of processing error on data quality
Low
13.3.4.6. Additional information processing error

Not available.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See sub-categories below.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

The first results were published on 1st February 2022 i.e. 14 months after the end of the reference year.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

The exact time lag is not yet known.

14.2. Punctuality

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

See sub-categories below.

14.2.1.1. Punctuality - delivery

Not requested.

14.2.1.2. Punctuality - publication

Not available.


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See sub-categories below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable, because there are no mirror flows in Integrated Farm Statistics.

15.1.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.1.2.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

The data sent to Eurostat and/or the published data regarding agricultural holdings respect the definition set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.2.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.1.3.1. Proofs that the EU coverage requirements are met

 

 

UAA (ha)

LSU

% of the total

% of the total

Group A

6,152.044

31,169

63

98

Group B

161.602

242

64

99

Group C

2,727.889

151

92

 99

Group D

762.852

286

100

100

Total

9,804.387

31,849

 

 

Group A – all holdings over the thresholds and producing for the market (are included in the main frame)

Group B - all holdings over the thresholds and producing mainly for self-consumption (are included in the main frame)

Group C - all holdings under the thresholds and producing for the market (are included in the frame extension)

Group D - all holdings under the thresholds and producing mainly for self-consumption (are included in the frame extension)

15.1.3.2. Differences between the national thresholds and the thresholds used for the data sent to Eurostat

The thresholds applied for the national data collection are the same as those applied for the data sent to Eurostat. 

15.1.3.3. Reasons for differences

Not applicable.

15.1.4. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.1.4.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 and EU handbook

The data that is sent to Eurostat and/or published data is with the same definitions and classification of variables included in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1874, and EU handbook.

15.1.4.1.1. The number of working hours and days in a year corresponding to a full-time job

The information is available in the annex. 
The number of working hours and days in a year for a full-time job corresponds to one annual working unit (AWU) in the country. One annual work unit corresponds to the work performed by one person who is occupied on an agricultural holding on a full-time basis. Annual working units are used to calculate the farm work on the agricultural holdings.



Annexes:
15.1.4.1.1. AWU
15.1.4.1.2. Point chosen in the Annual work unit (AWU) percentage band to calculate the AWU of holders, managers, family and non-family regular workers

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.3. AWU for workers of certain age groups

The information is available in the annex of item 15.1.4.1.1. 

15.1.4.1.4. Livestock coefficients

For Livestock coefficients, we used those included in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.4.1.5. Livestock included in “Other livestock n.e.c.”

There are no differences between the types of livestock included under the heading “Other livestock n.e.c.” and the types of livestock that should be included according to the EU handbook.

15.1.4.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.5. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.1.5.1. Deviations from Regulation (EU) 2018/1091

The data that is sent to Eurostat and/or published data is in compliance with the reference periods/days set in Regulation (EU) 2018/1091.

15.1.5.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.6. Common land
The concept of common land does not exist
15.1.6.1. Collection of common land data
Not applicable
15.1.6.2. Reasons if common land exists and data are not collected

Not applicable.

15.1.6.3. Methods to record data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.4. Source of collected data on common land
Not applicable
15.1.6.5. Description of methods to record data on common land

Not applicable.

15.1.6.6. Possible problems in relation to the collection of data on common land and proposals for future data collections

Not applicable.

15.1.7. National standards and rules for certification of organic products

See sub-categories below.

15.1.7.1. Deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007

No, there are not any deviations from Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007.

15.1.7.2. Reasons for deviations

Not applicable.

15.1.8. Differences in methods across regions within the country

Not applicable.

15.2. Comparability - over time

See sub-categories below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

17 years

15.2.2. Definition of agricultural holding

See sub-categories below.

15.2.2.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.2.2. Description of changes

Regulation (EU) 2018/1091 newly considers agricultural holdings with only fur animals. However, our country does not raise fur animals.

15.2.3. Thresholds of agricultural holdings

See sub-categories below.

15.2.3.1. Changes in the thresholds of holdings for which core data are sent to Eurostat since the last data transmission
There have been sufficient changes to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.3.2. Description of changes

For the census 2020, no thresholds were applied on the whole frame since the small holdings are not monitored every year. Therefore, it was decided to collect all the information from all the registered holdings to have a better picture. This was not done in FSS 2016, in which holdings that were of type 9 were not taken into consideration for the sample.

15.2.4. Geographical coverage

See sub-categories below.

15.2.4.1. Change in the geographical coverage since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.4.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.5. Definitions and classifications of variables

See sub-categories below.

15.2.5.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.5.2. Description of changes

Legal personality of the agricultural holding

In IFS, there is a new class (“shared ownership”) for the legal personality of the holding compared to FSS 2016, which triggers fluctuations of holdings in the classes of sole holder holdings and group holdings.

 

AWU

Till FSS 2016, we have asked the number of weeks/months that the person has worked during the year while in IFS 2020 we have asked the total number of hours worked. This change in the methodology of how data has been collected in both years may have an impact on the final data.

 

Other livestock n.e.c.

In FSS 2016, deer were included in this class, but in IFS they are classified separately.

Also in FSS 2016, there was a class for the collection of equidae. That has been dropped and equidae are included in IFS in "other livestock n.e.c."

 

Livestock units

In FSS 2016, turkeys, ducks, geese, ostriches, and other poultry were considered each one in a separate class with a coefficient of 0.03 for all the classes except for ostriches (coefficient 0.035). In IFS 2020, the coefficients were adjusted accordingly, with turkeys remaining at 0.03, ostriches remaining at 0.35, ducks adjusted to 0.01, geese adjusted to 0.02, and other poultry fowls n.e.c. adjusted to 0.001.

 

Organic animals

While in FSS only fully compliant (certified converted) animals were included, in IFS both animals under conversion and fully converted are included.

15.2.6. Reference periods/days

See sub-categories below.

15.2.6.1. Changes since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been some changes but not enough to warrant the designation of a break in series
15.2.6.2. Description of changes

Concerning livestock variables:

- In FSS 2016, for cattle, sheep, goats, and poultry, data referred to 1 September 2016 while for pigs the reference date was 1 December 2016. 
- In IFS 2020, the reference day for the variables on livestock was 30 September 2020

15.2.7. Common land

See sub-categories below.

15.2.7.1. Changes in the methods to record common land since the last data transmission to Eurostat
There have been no changes
15.2.7.2. Description of changes

Not applicable.

15.2.8. Explanations for major trends of main variables compared to the last data transmission to Eurostat

- Regarding the non-dairy cows, the increase over 2016 has been confirmed and it is also in line with the administrative data.

- For the variables ‘other sheep’ and ‘other goats’, the data has been confirmed and the increase can be attributed to the issue that the data has been collected directly from the farmer while in 2016 administrative data has been used and also the reference date, in 2016 it was 1st September while in 2020 it was 30th September.

- The drops in F1100T+F1200T and V0000_S0000TK is attributed to part of the increase in the kitchen garden.

- The drop in FA9 can be attributed to the way how the variable was collected in previous years; till 2016 it was asked as total other area of the holding while in 2020, it was asked as a separate variable for both the holding having arable land and those rearing livestock.

- The kitchen gardens K0000 is increased, as we are seeing that the number holdings cultivating products for their own consumption is increasing over the years.

- The sharp increase of the average worktime of the holding managers in 2020 compared to 2016 is due to a change in the methodology of how data has been collected in both years. Until 2016, we have asked the number of weeks/ months that the person has worked during the year while in 2020 we have asked the total number of hours worked.

15.2.9. Maintain of statistical identifiers over time
Yes
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See sub-categories below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because there are no sub annual data collections in agriculture.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable, because Integrated Farm Statistics have no relevance for national accounts.

15.3.3. Coherence at micro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.3.1. Analysis of coherence at micro level
Yes
15.3.3.2. Results of analysis at micro level

No analysis has been made for crop statistics since for such domain, we use the data collected in the Integrated Farm Statistics.

Regarding animal statistics, we have compared the data collected directly from the farmer for the specific reference date with the data used for the animal statistics that was compiled from the administrative source. Basically, there were no big changes between the two datasets. 

15.3.4. Coherence at macro level with data collections in other domains in agriculture

See sub-categories below.

15.3.4.1. Analysis of coherence at macro level
Yes
15.3.4.2. Results of analysis at macro level

With regards to the discrepancy in animal data (between Animal statistics and IFS) for A3100, this is related to different reference dates.

15.4. Coherence - internal

The data are internally consistent. This is ensured by the application of a wide range of validation rules.


16. Cost and Burden Top

See sub-categories below.

16.1. Coordination of data collections in agricultural statistics

For the Census 2020 that was carried out between October 2020 and February 2021, we have contacted all the farmers, and therefore for this time around we did not coordinate questionnaires of different data collections. This has been done since in the Census we collected data on each and every parcel while in other surveys we collect aggregated data related to all the parcels being worked by the farmer.

16.2. Efficiency gains since the last data transmission to Eurostat
Further automation
16.2.1. Additional information efficiency gains

For the Census 2020, we used the CAPI method for data collection and therefore information was transferred every day and there was no need to do data entry from our side since the data was being received directly in our system.

16.3. Average duration of farm interview (in minutes)

See sub-categories below.

16.3.1. Core

Not available

16.3.2. Module ‘Labour force and other gainful activities‘

Not available

16.3.3. Module ‘Rural development’

Not available

16.3.4. Module ‘Animal housing and manure management’

Not available.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Data collected in the Census 2020, is final when it is published and there will not be any revisions.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not applicable.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top


Annexes:
18.Timetable Statistical Process
18.1. Source data

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1. Population frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.1.1. Type of frame
List frame
18.1.1.2. Name of frame

Statistical Farm Register

18.1.1.3. Update frequency
Annual
18.1.2. Core data collection on the main frame

See sub-categories below.

18.1.2.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.2.2. Sampling design

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.2.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable for 2019/2020.

18.1.2.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.3. Core data collection on the frame extension

See sub-categories below.

18.1.3.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.3.2. Sampling design

Not applicable.

18.1.3.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.3.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable

18.1.3.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable

18.1.3.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4. Module “Labour force and other gainful activities”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.4.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.4.2. Sampling design

Not applicable

18.1.4.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable.

18.1.4.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable

18.1.4.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.4.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.5. Module “Rural development”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.5.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.5.2. Sampling design

Not applicable

18.1.5.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable

18.1.5.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable

18.1.5.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.5.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.6. Module “Animal housing and manure management module”

See sub-categories below.

18.1.6.1. Coverage of agricultural holdings
Census
18.1.6.2. Sampling design

Not applicable

18.1.6.2.1. Name of sampling design
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.2. Stratification criteria
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.3. Use of systematic sampling
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.4. Full coverage strata

Not applicable

18.1.6.2.5. Method of determination of the overall sample size

Not applicable

18.1.6.2.6. Method of allocation of the overall sample size
Not applicable
18.1.6.2.7. If sampled from the core sample, the sampling strategy and calibration strategy
Not applicable
18.1.12. Software tool used for sample selection

Not applicable.

18.1.13. Administrative sources

See sub-categories below.

18.1.13.1. Administrative sources used and the purposes of using them

The information is available on Eurostat's website.

18.1.13.2. Description and quality of the administrative sources

See the attached Excel file in the Annex.



Annexes:
18.1.13.2 Description_quality_administrative sources
18.1.13.3. Difficulties using additional administrative sources not currently used
None
18.1.14. Innovative approaches

The information on innovative approaches and the quality methods applied is available on Eurostat's website.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

The agricultural census is conducted every 10 years. The decennial agricultural census is complemented by sample or census-based data collections organised every 3-4 years in-between.

18.3. Data collection

See sub-categories below.

18.3.1. Methods of data collection
Face-to-face, electronic version
Telephone, electronic version
18.3.2. Data entry method, if paper questionnaires
Not applicable
18.3.3. Questionnaire

Please find the questionnaire in annex.



Annexes:
18.3.3.Questionnaire
18.4. Data validation

See sub-categories below.

18.4.1. Type of validation checks
Data format checks
Completeness checks
Comparisons with other domains in agricultural statistics
18.4.2. Staff involved in data validation
Supervisors
Staff from central department
18.4.3. Tools used for data validation

For the data validation, we used primarily Microsoft Access, SPSS and excel.

18.5. Data compilation

Not applicable.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

18.5.2. Methods used to derive the extrapolation factor
Not applicable
18.6. Adjustment

Covered under Data compilation.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable to Integrated Farm Statistics, because it collects structural data on agriculture.


19. Comment Top

See sub-categories below.

19.1. List of abbreviations

CAP – Common Agricultural Policy

CAPI –  Computer Assisted Personal Interview

CATI – Computer Assisted Telephone Interview

CAWI – Computer Assisted Web Interview

CoP - Code of Practice

ESS -  European Statistical System

FSS – Farm Structure Survey

IACS – Integrated Administration and Control System

IFS – Integrated Farm Statistics

LSU – Livestock units

MAFA - Ministry for Agriculture, Fisheries, Food and Animal

NACE – Nomenclature of Economic Activities

NSO - National Statistics Office

NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics

PAPI – Paper and Pencil Interview

QMF - Quality Management Framework

SO – Standard output

UAA – Utilised agricultural area

19.2. Additional comments

No additional comments.


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top