Back to top

Census 2021 round (cens_21)

DownloadPrint

National Reference Metadata in Euro SDMX Metadata Structure (ESMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Poland

Need help? Contact the Eurostat user support

Description of the main topics dissaminated for population, households, families, living quarters and dwellings.

23 April 2025

The information is given separately for each census topic. See the sub-concepts 3.4.1 - 3.4.37.

In the 2021 National Population and Housing Census, the statistical units were: building, dwelling, person. Secondarily derived units (based on person data) were household and family.

"Target population" means the set of all statistical units in a defined geographical area at the reference date that are eligible for a survey on one or more specified topics. The target population includes each valid statistical unit exactly once.

In accordance with the provisions of the Census Act 2021, the Population and Housing Census was conducted  on the territory of the Republic of Poland and covered the following population groups:

  • Polish citizens residing in Poland who have their place of residence (understood as the place of permanent or temporary registration or as a place of permanent or temporary residence) in dwellings, buildings, other premises other than a dwelling or in collective living quarters;
  • foreigners residing in Poland permanently and staying temporarily (whether registered or not) in dwellings, buildings, other premises other than a dwelling or in collective living quarters;
  • Polish citizens residing abroad (regardless of the period of residence) who had not deregistered from permanent residence in Poland;
  • homeless persons persons living in the streets without a shelter – Poilsh citizens and foreigners;

moreover:

  • dwellings, buildings, other occupied premises other than a dwelling.

A person who deregistered from permanent residence in Poland due to the permanent stay abroad is not obliged to participate in the National Population and Housing Census 2021.

The census did not include:

  •  heads and foreign staff of diplomatic representations and consular offices of foreign countries, their family members and other persons enjoying privileges and immunities under the law, international agreements or generally recognized international customs;
  •  apartments, buildings, facilities and premises owned by diplomatic representations and consular offices of foreign countries         

Information is provided in the sub-concepts 5.1 - 5.3.

Information on the accuracy of individual topics in accordance with the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/543 of 22 March 2017. See the sub-concepts 13.1.1 - 13.1.35.

Counts of statistical units should be expressed in numbers and where is needed rate per inhabitants enumerated in the country.

Stages of Processing Census Data

For the tasks associated with storing, processing, and analysing population and housing census data, two main IT environments were used:

  • Operational Microdata Base (OMB) – an environment with very limited and strictly protected and controlled access, where identifiable data are processed. Part of the processes requiring identifiable data took place in this environment.
  • Analytical Microdata Base (ABM) – an environment where anonymised data are stored and processed, characterised by less restrictive access.

In addition to the two mentioned, there is also a computer environment for managing and controlling the course of the questionnaire-based census survey (CORstat-census), used until the end of the implementation phase of the questionnaire-based census survey.


In the entire process of developing the results of the 2021 Census, 7 main stages (groups of processes) of processing can be identified; however, their order (numbering) should be considered conventional, as some of them took place simultaneously, and many were repeated multiple times (e.g., as data sources were updated):

1. Acquisition of sets from administrative registers and their adaptation to statistical needs – i.e., transforming them into statistical data sets. The first action at this stage was the very acquisition of the register sets and the metadata describing them from the register managers and their preliminary checking in terms of the conformity of structures and contents of the sets with the provisions of the documentation regarding the transfer of the sets.

In the next step of this stage, raw register sets, which varied in terms of technical, formal, and substantive aspects, were adapted to statistical needs. In particular, these were actions such as the identification of study units (recognition of units and assigning artificial unique identifiers), unification of the format and structure of sets, and standardisation of variables, i.e., recoding raw variable values into codes compliant with classifications in force in statistics, including, for example, the conversion of various address records into appropriate codes of the nomenclature of the territorial division used in public statistics - TERYT.

The process of acquiring and adapting registry collections took place in the OBM and was repeatable as updated registry collections were delivered.

2. Creation of a (pre)census list based on register data. To be precise, the List of persons, addresses and dwellings is a set of relational tables, each related to a different type of unit under observation (i.e., persons, dwellings, and buildings). This list was the main source of information about the units that were to be enumerated and, as such, served as the operational register of the census and a key tool for managing the census, controlling the completeness of the enumerated persons, buildings, and dwellings, as well as being the basis of the authentication procedure for respondents in the online self-enumeration. Moreover, the list, before the census survey, was an approximation of the target populations of statistical units determined based on existing register data (predefined target population). The process was carried out within the OBM system. This process was repeatedly carried out (even after the commencement of the census survey) as updated registry collections were acquired (until the data was updated to the reference moment of the census).

After the census survey, based on the data obtained in the census, the (pre)census list was updated – mainly in terms of new statistical units identified in the census survey - providing the basis for creating a post-census list, which constituted the subject core of the census result collections.

3. Creation of Domain Data Sets (DZD), was a process carried out in the OBM involving the full integration of multi-source resources acquired from registries, dispersed in many diverse collections, into data table structures that meet the methodological and substantive requirements of the census survey.

As a result of this process, data from registers were organised into sets whose structures were created according to a model that considered both the types of statistical units being studied (buildings, dwellings, persons, etc.) and thematic groups (domains) within a given type of units. For example, in relation to persons, separate sets were created for thematic domains such as demographic and social characteristics, socio-economic characteristics, disability, migration, foreigners, and economic activity.

The systematic organisation of registry data facilitated the analysis of data within a given domain and ensured the optimisation of processing procedures since some topics only concerned parts of the population (optimal set sizes).

The algorithms used at this stage for generating variables and their validation and correction constituted a further step towards improving the quality of registry data and their optimal adaptation to the needs of developing resulting census variables.

4. The census survey process (questionnaire survey phase) – involved collecting data from respondents, carried out through three main survey techniques: Internet self-enumeration (CAWI), personal interview (CAPI), and telephone interview (CATI). (In the GUS nomenclature, survey data collected by all techniques are collectively referred to as data from “CAxI channels”). This process was executed within the CORstat-census system, which successively and continuously transmitted sets of electronic records from completed surveys to the OBM system.

5. Creation of Data Tables from CAxI Channels – This involved the integration, verification, and cleaning of data from CAxI channels (questionnaire survey). This process took place in the OBM and included transforming the questionnaire data streams received from CORstat-census into elementary data sets corresponding to individual study units and each of the various thematic modules and types of questionnaires for a given type of unit (for example, data about persons were in several modules, and some of them were filled out only for one respondent in a dwelling, while some types of questionnaires were dedicated to special categories of persons, e.g., those temporarily abroad).

The elementary sets were then appropriately combined to form main sets corresponding to the units under study, i.e., persons, dwellings, and buildings, or special parts of the study, i.e., the set of collective living quarters (CLQs) and the set of persons enumerated in them (individuals in OZZ). The next step involved the verification and cleaning of the sets. In this phase of the process, the identification of study units was carried out, consisting of the recognition of units – including, for example, persons without an official identifier (PESEL number) or dwellings with incorrectly or imprecisely provided address data by the respondent – and then assigning them artificial unique identifiers.

In the subsequent step, the optimal data selection (deduplication) was carried out, i.e., selecting the best version of the same survey (in some cases the same survey was edited several times by respondents, and each version was saved in the system) as well as selecting the most adequate and qualitatively best data record for the unit (e.g., by design, persons could have been enumerated multiple times – in different and independent surveys – enumerated by household members and enumerated independently). As a result of this stage, datasets were created (according to the type of units surveyed) containing optimal quality (most adequate and reliable) data from the questionnaire-based census survey (Data Tables from CAxI channels), intended for processing census results.

6. Post-enumeration control survey process - this was a representative survey on a sample from the enumerated population, whose main goal was to analyse the quality of the basic census survey in terms of assessing errors in the measurement of characteristics, i.e., the content of responses obtained in the main survey. At this stage, the following main groups of processing activities can be distinguished:

  • Selection of the register sample for the survey: Based on the data developed from CAxI from the main survey (CAxI data), a sampling frameregister was created for the control survey according to the guidelines/concept of the control survey, and then a sample of individuals for the survey was drawn and transferred to the CORstat-census system.
  • The implementation phase of the control survey in the field, serviced by the CORstat-census system, ended with the transfer of collected data to the OBM.
  • Creation of the Set for Analysis - Based on data from the control survey and the corresponding data (appropriate records and variables) from the main survey, which formed the basis for conducting comparative analyses and ultimately developing reports on quality assessment.

7. Creation of the Resulting Census Data Sets (WZDS). The WZDS is the proper and essential database from the perspective of the objectives of the population census, comprising several tables of data interconnected by relationships, corresponding to all types of statistical units that were to be characterised based on the 2021 population census. The WZDS is the basis for deriving all final results of the 2021 population census. Therefore, the WZDS compiled the appropriate data records representing (or containing) all the target population units and the appropriate variables representing all the census topics. In the WZDS, appropriate indications (flagging) of units (records) belonging to appropriately defined target populations surveyed in the census were also made (see the "Estimation" section point).

The Resulting Census Data Sets (WZDS) were created based on developed and implemented structures (lists of needed variables) and algorithms for deriving variable values. In terms of data records, the core of the WZDS became the post-census list, which is the List of persons, addresses and dwellings updated after the questionnaire survey, defining the set of subjects (observations) of the individual data tables to be described with variable values.

The WZDS model provided for appropriate data tables for all types of statistical units studied, including new entities generated only at the stage of WZDS, such as households and families. Correspondingly, for each data table, a corresponding metadata table (known as the "source origin file") was created, matching in structure and the number of records, which recorded the source of origin for each individual variable value in the data table.

In the process of processing the WZDS, two essential (sub)stages can be distinguished: 1) processing in the OBM environment (protected) and 2) processing in the ABM environment.

In the protected environment of the OBM, all operations for processing in the WZDS that required access to source data (CAxI and DZD data) and the full set of identifying features (such as surnames, complete addresses, etc.) were performed. Calculating the values of the WZDS variables in the OBM environment was done by executing algorithms that referred to data prepared in earlier processing stages, encompassing two main sources of data: data from the questionnaire survey (CAxI data) and registry data organised in domain tables (DZD). Depending on the nature of the variable – for instance, whether official information (such as birth date) or information declared by the respondent is more reliable – the algorithms assumed the priority of CAxI or DZD respectively. The decisive criterion was the availability of information in the priority data source, and for example, in the absence of preferred information from the respondent, data from the DZD (registry data) was used.
In some situations, it was necessary to use complex algorithms, such as those distinguishing original types of sources (specific types of registers), containing conditional selection instructions, comparing values from different sources, or referring to other auxiliary variables.

In the OBM environment, where information identifying persons were available, new objects (statistical units) such as households and families were generated, and separate tables within the WZDS were created for them (details in the "Generation of households and families" section).

After completing the necessary operations in the OBM, the WZDS tables underwent a data anonymisation procedure. This involves generating new versions of data tables stripped of variables that enable direct identification. These tables were then exported to the ABM, along with their corresponding metadata tables.

In the ABM environment, the data tables and the WZDS transferred from the OBM were given a new data structure, expanded with new resulting variables. The algorithms for calculating the values of new variables in ABM operated exclusively on data available in the WZDS. At this stage of WZDS processing, the algorithms generally included secondary transformation procedures, which consisted of generating new versions (new necessary representations) of existing variables, for example, by grouping (creating broader classes) of original variables, but also creating new derivative variables based on the values of two or more source variables. In the ABM environment, the majority of such WZDS variables were created that required inter-object transformations, i.e., based on operations of retrieving, compiling, and transferring values between different types of statistical units (e.g., between persons, families, households, dwellings, etc.).

The processing of the WZDS in both the OBM and the ABM was divided into multiple steps, and the WZDS processing stages in both environments (OBM and ABM) were iterative (repeatable). After each step or iteration, validation actions were carried out, based on rules for checking correctness, and generating and analysing reports that check the effect and quality of the transformations. Based on these, algorithms for calculating variables were corrected (refined), and, if necessary, additional data editing operations were carried out, i.e., corrections and filling in missing values (details in the "Record editing" section).

All processing algorithms, both assigning and modifying a given variable value, contained instructions for recording in the corresponding place of the metadata table (“origin file”), indicating the source of the value's origin.

In the ABM environment, where the WZDS data obtained their final form, appropriate meta-information (various types of dictionaries) was developed for them, which allowed for the proper interpretation of codes – variable values in the data tables.

Based on the WZDS data and metadata in the ABM environment, appropriate data needed for the analysis and dissemination of census results were generated, including reports and publication preparations, such as data (e.g., hypercubes) for reports and statements on quality.

Capturing

The census in Poland was conducted based on questionnaire surveys and data from registers, according to the assumptions (included in the census law). The data obtained from each source, including from the census survey (census questionnaire), were in electronic form. Paper questionnaires were not used.

Coding

Most questions in the census questionnaires were pre-coded, meaning that directly under the questions, there were proposed answers in the form of multiple-choice options (cafeteria) or (in the case of a larger number of possible answers) drop-down lists (answer dictionary). Selecting an answer resulted in the recording of the appropriate code in the electronic data sets (CAxI data sets). The questions, along with predefined answers, were consistent with accepted national and international definitions and classifications, or sufficiently detailed to be transformed (e.g., aggregated) into the expected classifications.

For a few questions in the census questionnaire, the possibility of free text entry was used, which required the application of procedures (generally automatic) for classifying and coding according to an algorithm developed by experts.

Regarding data from various registers, it was necessary to apply procedures to unify (standardise) the non-uniform records and adjust them to the definitions and classifications applicable in the census.

Identifying variable(s)

In the processes of processing census data, many different types of identifying variables were used to identify various kinds of statistical units. Among these, one should distinguish between primary (natural and raw) identifying variables, which exist and are used also outside of public statistics and the census itself, and variables – artificial identifiers, created solely within and for the needs of census data processing systems. The use of artificial identifiers was necessary to optimize the process of integrating data from various sources, including detecting duplicated data records for some units. Moreover, artificial identifiers allowed maintaining data integrity in the phases of processing and analysis carried out after the data anonymisation procedure (removing variables allowing direct identification of units), i.e., they ensured a relationship between records of different datasets while simultaneously preventing the direct identification of units. In relation to persons – before the assignment of artificial identifiers – the official identifier used in the population register in Poland – PESEL number, was primarily used for the identification of units, and in addition – especially in its absence – natural identifying characteristics such as first names, last names, parents' names, as well as secondary identifying characteristics, such as date of birth, sex, citizenship, etc. As part of the procedure for identifying and recognising units (detailed description of the procedure in the "record linkage" section) all data records about persons from each source set were assigned an artificial identifier – Unique Statistical Number (UNS), valid in all statistical sets and in all subsequent processing stages. For family and households, only artificial identifiers (id_household, id_family) were used, assigned at the time of creating sets (delineating) households and families (more detailed information in the section concerning the generation of households and families). In relation to dwellings and buildings, artificial identifiers were also used, necessary for optimising the process of data integration and ensuring relationships between records of different datasets.

Record editing

In the census questionnaire (census application), a set of rules was applied to enforce consistency and logical coherence of the responses given. Similarly, the algorithms for calculating (creating) variables in the result datasets assumed a certain scope and logical coherence of the values assigned (see section 18.4 "Data validation"). In addition to this, during the processing of the Resulting Census Data Set (WZDS), a series of actions were taken aimed at validating and then correcting the data. Rules were applied to check the content of variables and their mutual relations, as well as to generate reports presenting distributions and variable relations in stages. Depending on the situation and processing phase, corrections to the basic algorithms were made or data correcting procedures were implemented. Most corrections were automatic and resulted from the logical assumptions of relationships between variables; in rare cases, such as outliers or less credible values, ad hoc point corrections were applied. All types of data corrections were performed using computer instructions, meaning that at no stage was direct (manual) editing in data records applied.

Generally, most data for census topics were obtained from the questionnaire census survey, and in cases where data was not obtained in the survey, it was sourced from registry sets. This procedure ensured sufficient completeness in relation to most census topics (characteristics) concerning persons. However, there were a few cases of individual characteristics that were not represented at all in registry sets or were represented only fragmentarily, resulting in too large (unacceptable) a number of missing values.

In cases of excessive data missing for variables, positional imputation procedures were used. An example of such a characteristic was education. In the absence of data on the level of education from the basic sources of the census, i.e., data from respondents (questionnaire census survey) and data from registries, statistical imputation was applied. The hot-deck imputation method was used, i.e., replacing missing data with values from other complete (with known education variable values) census dataset records. The assignment of data was carried out within common imputation classes (groups), to which recipients (records with missing data) and donors (records with known values of the education characteristic) were assigned, according to the adopted criterion of proximity. The allocation of donors and recipients to common imputation groups was based on auxiliary characteristics (proximity criterion in the context of education) such as sex, age, and the unit of territorial division of the country. Assigning important feature values to recipients was done randomly – with a probability proportional to the distribution of feature values among donors – within the common imputation class.

Imputation of variables related to dwellings and buildings was done by deductive method. This concerned variables such as useful floor space, number of rooms in an dwellings, title of ownership, water supply system, flush toilet, type of heating and bathroom. In the absence of data for the aforementioned variables from basic census sources, i.e., data from respondents (questionnaire census survey) and data from registries, deductive imputation was applied - missing data were supplemented with values calculated from other complete census dataset records or deduced based on other variables completed for a specific dwelling.

Record imputation

No data records about persons were imputed.

Record deletion

In the Resulting Census Data Set (WZDS), no data records about persons were removed.

Estimation

All planned estimates – calculating the counts of the surveyed populations, distributions of characteristics, and other statistical operations needed to present the results – could be performed based on census data sets, which contained individual data records for all statistical units entering into the surveyed census populations (individual enumeration – data for the total population). Records of each set of statistical units contain assignment to territorial units and spatial location, which allows estimating the size of census populations and their characteristics for all necessary territorial arrangements (universality within the defined territory).

Determining the census population of persons, i.e., including persons in the usually resident population, as well as their spatial location, was based on appropriate algorithms, which primarily took into account respondents' answers to a sequence of questions regarding their place of residence, the nature of the demand (permanent vs temporary), and the time spent in a given place.

For persons who were ultimately not covered by the questionnaire survey, separate algorithms were applied, based on the content of registry data, including data on registration addresses and other information concerning signs of life (number of registries, types and specificity of registries). In the algorithms determining the place and nature of the stay of persons available exclusively in the registries, separate paths and hierarchies of source credibility were applied depending on the population segment (e.g., foreigners, children, people of mobile age, seniors).

For this separately identified the usually resident population, all required characterising features were individually determined, which allowed for any combination and cross-referencing of features. Determining (calculating) the value of each characteristic of persons was carried out based on algorithms, which, according to the specificity of the characteristic and the availability of a given type of source, reached to the results of the questionnaire survey or registry data (detail in the description of stage no. 7, in the section "Processing stages").

Determining the population of dwellings was preceded by the verification of dwelling addresses conducted during the preparatory work for the census. Information collected during the census on the size of dwellings, the period of construction of the building in which the dwelling is located, and the equipment of dwellings with technical and sanitary installations allowed for assessing the standard of dwelling stocks. The analysis of information characterizing the dwellings, including in particular conventional dwellings, with information concerning the people who inhabit them, allowed for determining the housing arrangements of the population residing in the country as of March 31, 2021.

Record linkage including identifying variable(s) used for the record linkage

Generally, individual datasets for various statistical units (e.g., persons, families, dwellings, buildings) within the same processing stages were organised in the form of relational tables. Establishing relations between tables within the same processing stage (ensuring data set integrity), but also transferring relevant data between subsequent processing stages was made possible through the use of artificial (technical) unique identifiers (relationship keys), for each type of statistical units. The assignment of artificial identifiers took place within the procedures of identifying (recognising) statistical units, which were implemented in relation to all source data (data from registers and later from the questionnaire census survey), entering the processing system (operational microdata base - OBM)), especially at processing stages numbered: 1, 2, 3, and 5.

The recognition of a unit and the assignment of an artificial identifier took place through the pairing (linking) of raw data entering the processing system with the already existing reference tables of units in the system, which contained artificial identifiers.

The initial reference unit tables were initiated based on chronologically earliest introduced registry sets (e.g., the set of persons from the PESEL registry) deduplicated and assigned an artificial identifier (subsequent integer number). In the process of introducing subsequent registry sets, the reference unit tables were donors of artificial identifiers for records from new sets, and at the same time, they were expanded by additional records (units) identified in new sets. Units from the raw (input) set, after successful linkage, received an artificial identifier from the reference table. On the other hand, units that did not pair with the reference table were subject to verification (in terms of the credibility of the unit's existence), and then were added to the reference unit table, expanding it as new identified statistical units (new records) recognised in the processing system.

These procedures were repeated for each newly acquired registry set and for updated versions of sets. As a result of identifying registry sets, it was possible to create a (pre)census personal-address-residence list, which – among other functions – served as reference tables for identifying statistical units within data acquired from the questionnaire survey (CAxI data).

The process of linkage new sets entering the system with the reference unit tables was carried out based on natural identifying variables available in the raw (input) data sets. In the case of persons, identifying linkage took place – depending on availability – on the basis of such data as PESEL number, first names, surnames, date of birth, sex, mothers' names and surnames, address data, citizenship, country of birth, etc. The result of linkage records concerning persons was to assign the data records a Unique Statistical Number (UNS).

Most records concerning persons were paired unambiguously (deterministically) by PESEL number. In the absence of a PESEL number, data were paired by other characteristics of the persons. Due to the varied availability of other identifying features, their incompleteness, diversity of records and errors in records (e.g., first names, surnames or even dates of birth), multilevel and multi-stage linkage methods were used, based on measures of similarity in the vector of identifying features and the probability of record match. Algorithms for using the measure (indicator) of similarity considered the variability of availability of identifying features and various functions of comparing strings of characters, patterns of numerical recording errors (e.g., dates of birth), as well as qualifying critical values – thresholds for acceptance/rejection of conformity.Początek formularzaDół formularza

Generation of households and families

The delineation of households and families was carried out in the course of a secondary process, based on a previously prepared set of persons, i.e., the determined usual resident population. Essentially, the generation of new units was accomplished by combining (grouping) persons, i.e., assigning them to new units – households and families, giving these extracted units unique artificial identifiers, and creating records for them in new datasets (tables) provided respectively for households and families. In terms of households, the housing concept (definition) of a household was adopted. Consequently, the delineation of households was based on an algorithm that refers to the housing criterion, according to which all people living in one dwelling (common dwelling identifier) were included in one household.

The delineation of families – according to the adopted definition – was carried out within the people belonging to the same household (same dwelling), based on a complex algorithm, considering various data about persons. The basis of the family generation procedure was the processed and appropriately assigned data about the relations between persons, obtained from respondents in the questionnaire survey (CAxI data), in which respondents listed together – within the framework of so-called one housing survey – could indicate among themselves spouses/partners and parents. In the absence of appropriate data from CAxI, reference was made to relevant data on marital relations and parent-child relations, available in processed registry collections. In the absolute absence of appropriate data on relationships between persons, attempts were made to determine them on the basis of probability using various individual auxiliary characteristics of persons such as surnames, sex, and age (generational groups), as well as appropriate interpretation of data on the composition of the household.

For the created data records about households and families, variables characterising these units were generated, generally calculated by applying various aggregating functions operating on the groups of data records about persons belonging to the household/family, e.g., counting the number of members, the number of specific categories of members, such as children, etc.

Measures to identify or limit unit-no-information

Factors conducive to minimising unit-level data deficiencies in the census (omissions of units belonging to the census populations) include the solutions adopted for the implementation of the census, primarily the use of a large amount of data resources from registers and information systems, and a wide range of methods for their exploration, as well as a high degree of implementation (completeness) of the questionnaire-based census study. Moreover, solutions and actions taken in identification (recognition) of statistical units within the entire resource of collected data seem to be significant in this matter.

For 2021 Census purpose data from an electronic application obtained from respondents and data from registers and administrative systems were used. A detailed description of the sources is presented in the sub-concepts 18.1.1 - 18.1.4.

Data on population and housing censuses are disseminated every decade.

The census reference date is March 31, 2021.

Population by grid was published in December 2022.

Final census data for dwellings, population, households and families by layout and breakdowns in accordance with EU implementing regulations available by March 31, 2024.

The definitions adopted and the breakdowns for themes ensure comparability of results at EU level.

Geographical area (GEO)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level.

 

SEX (SEX)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level.

 

Age (AGE)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level.

 

Legal marital status (LMS)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level. Marital status was defined for persons aged 15 and over and was defined as marital status according to Polish law (the Law on Civil Status Acts). Polish law allows women from the age of 16 and men from the age of 18 to marry.

Polish law does not allow same-sex marriages. As a result, the Polish census did not provide information on same-sex relationships, neither in law nor in fact, in marriage. Polish legislation does not provide for registered partnerships.

 

Household status (HST)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level. No information has been developed in the classification of a topic specified as optional for same-sex marriages/partnerships

Persons living in a household, undetermined category – in the Polish census there are no persons classified in this category (there are only people living in the household: in the biological family or outside the biological family).

Persons not living in a household, undetermined category – in the Polish census there are no persons classified in this category (there are only people living in a private household and not living in a private household: in collective living quarters and homeless persons).

 

Family status (FST)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level. No information has been developed in the classification of the topic specified as optional.

According to the definition only first-degree relationships between children and adults (between parents and children) are taken into account to determine families.

Polish law does not allow the registration of partnerships. Therefore, the Polish census did not compile information on partners in registered partnerships. There was also no information on same-sex couples.

Item “undetermined” – in the Polish census there are no persons classified in this category (there are only persons

of established position in the family and non-family members). 

‘Not applicable’ – includes persons who do not form a biological family.

                                                                                                                                   

Size of family nucleus (SFN)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level.

Type of household (TPH)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level.

 

Size od private household (SPH)

The accepted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level

 

Educational atainment (EDU)

The accepted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of breakdown ensure comparability of results at EU level

 

Size of the locality (LOC)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level

 

Place of birth (POB)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level

 

Country of citizenship (COC)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level

 

Year of arrival in the country (YAE)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level

 

Place of usual residence one year prior to the census (ROY)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level

 

Current activity status (CAS)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Status in employment (SIE)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Occupation (OCC)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Industry (IND)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Location of place of work (LPW)

The adopted definition of the concept, as well as the breakdowns, ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Tenure status of households (TSH)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Housing arrangements (HAR)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Type of living quarter (TLQ)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Occupancy status of conventional dwelling (OWS)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Number of occupants (NOC)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Type of ownership (OCS)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Useful floor space (UFS)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Number of rooms (NOR)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Density standard (floor space) (DFS)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Density standard (number of rooms) (DRM)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results

at the EU level.

 

Water supply system (WSS)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Toilet facilities (TOI)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Bathing facilities (BAT)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Type of heating (TOH)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Dwellings by type of building (TOB)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

 

Dwellings by period of construction (POC)

The adopted definition of the concept and the levels and categories of division ensure the comparability of results at the EU level.

Not applicable.