Summary
| Contact point | Anna Amgren, koordinator NEA |
| Date | 3rd October 2018 |
| Venue | A Odenplan Norrtullsgatan 6Stockholm |
| Room capacity | 75 |
| Target audience (and expected number of attendees) | 45pax Mainly private sector with some public audience as well. Service providers and larger customers with own eProcurement department |
Content and topics to be covered
| # | Modules | Your choice |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Introduction to eInvoicing | |
| 2 | The legal background | |
| 3 | The European norm and its content | X |
| 4 | Infrastructure based on the eDelivery DSI architecture | |
| 5 | eInvoicing from a user perspective (including ordering and payments) | X |
| 6 | Examples of early adopters of large scale eInvoicing – lessons learned | X |
| 7 | Basic XML using examples from the EN-syntaxes + mapping/conversion considerations | |
| 8 | XML Validation mechanisms | X |
| 9 | Understanding OASIS UBL 2.1 | |
| 10 | Understanding UN/CEFACT CII D16B | |
| 11 | Funding and grants for e-Invoicing | X |
| 12 | Introduction to the eInvoice DSI resources and tools | X |
| 13 | Introduction to CEF Digital and e-Invoice readiness checker | X |
Agenda
– Introduktion till den europeiska standarden och hur den kommer användas av offentlig sektor i Sverige
– EU-direktivet och Sveriges implementation
– Detaljerad genomgång av specifikationerna med fokus på nya PEPPOL-fakturan.
– Roadmap för införandet – viktiga datum och migreringsfrågor
Lunch
– Efter lunchen har vi workshop i mindre grupper kring aktuella frågeställningar och går igenom dessa.
– Sen finns det möjlighet att boka en egen kort session (15-20 min) med Christian och Martin för att gå igenom just ert företags frågor och utmaningar.
Questions during the workshop
Question | Answers | Actions to be taken |
|---|---|---|
| Who are you? | Almost 100% service providers | |
| Do you have a profile at CEF Digital? | 2 out of 45 has a profile | |
| Which eInvoicing formats do you currently use? | SWE-Faktura 380 / 381 | |
| Two formats - do you see this as an opportunity or challenge? | ||
| Is CEF eDelivery/PEPPOL relevant to you? | ||
| Dont you believe it is a problem with the cross-border scenario if each country has its own standard and does not follow the - lets say the PEPPOL CIUS - where at least someone is coordinating the development? | ||
| Does this mean that you have to support the full standard to allow all suppliers across Europa to send their invoices? | ||
| Have you started implementing the standard? | No - 100% no. | |
| Have you bought the standard yet? | No - 100% no. | |
| Have you applied for CEF funding before? | No - 100% no. | |
Question from audience: Is it normal to apply for CEF funding? | Answer: It depends on the countries and especially the Nordic have been few applications. But it would be good to have more Nordic applications from Swedish, Danish and Norwegian service providers. | |
Question from the audience: Who maintains the standard in Sweden? | Answer: Swedish Standard together with CEN and the other Member States. | |
| How many knows about the SWE-Faktura and content? | 1/4 of the audience | |
| How many knows about the new EN for eInvoicing? | None | |
| How many have looked at the PEPPOL BIS BILLING 3.0 and PEPPOL CIUS? | 1/3 of the audience | |
| Deadline for implementing the new standard? | The deadline in the directive is 18th April 2019, but in some countries there is different deadlines such Norway with 1st January 2019 and Sweden with 1st April 2019 | |
| COMMENT: As service providers we hope that Extensions to the standard is not going to be used, as this would stop interoperability between users and service providers. | ||
| If other countries impose earlier deadlines for the standard - would this mean that Swedish service providers should have the same standard if sending to Norway? | No, Norway should still have PEPPOL BIS 2 and EHF until the overall deadline of 18th April 2019. So the period in between is still ok to send with old invoices. | |
| COMMENT: Overall, we believe that the new standard will be much better as documentation and implementation guidelines is improved than previous standards. | ||
Pictures from the workshop
