You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Dear EMSFEI members,

At the latest EMSFEI meeting held on  we provided you with an update of the main outcomes of the 2016 'State of play of B2G eInvoicing in public procurement' that is currently in the final stages of being approved by the European Commission. As part of this analysis, 12 high-level 'country sheets' have been created. You have been asked to review and modify these country sheets to prepare for a dedicated agenda slot in the last EMSFEI meeting.

Since we are now preparing the approach for the 2017 Study on the 'State of play of B2G eInvoicing in public procurement', we kindly ask you to provide your views and ideas by completing the forms below or by posting comments directly in the comments section.

Please note that this request should support you for the agenda point of the CEF eInvoicing Stakeholder Day to be held on  during the dedicated workshop afternoon session. The purpose of this workshop will be to suggest ideas to expand on the information currently available for each country sheet and identify the broadest range of stakeholders to inform about getting prepared for the upcoming European Standard on eInvoicing.

Therefore, we would be very grateful to receive your input, ideas, comments and feedback by

Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any queries.

We look forward to your participation!

Best regards,

The CEF SMO

 

What questions would you suggest to address in the online survey?

(Please see here the questions addressed for the 2016 study)

(can we have a free answer form with the option of adding more than one line?)

 

Please provide us with contacts of specific people and/or organisations that you would like to be involved in answering the online survey.

Name or person/organisation:

Email(s):

Other contact(s):

Please provide your feedback on the Country Sheets that were previously shared with you. You can directly edit the below pages or provide feedback in the comment sections.

(maybe we could have the same summary table that we have in the Country sheets main page)

  • No labels