...
| Question | Answers | Actions to be taken |
|---|---|---|
| Who are you? | Mostly private sector - some from public sector. Service providers among others. | |
| Do you have a profile at CEF Digital? | 3 out of 30 has a profile | Invite participants to use CEF Digital |
Do you see other areas where trainings and webinars could be of interest? | N/A | |
| Do public authorities have electronic workflow support for managing invoices? | There is a webapplication for the central government to receive and approve the eInvoices | Note: Basically a 3 corner model |
| Which eInvoicing formats do you currently use? | UBL has been used for many year both in private and public sector | 2 standards to be used in the future |
| The European standard requires a high level of information quality. Can this prove to be a challenge in your coming implementation? | Not really as UBL has been in use for years | |
| Two formats - do you see this as an opportunity or challenge? | One standard would have been preferred (UBL) | |
| Is CEF eDelivery/PEPPOL relevant to you? | 2 service providers are currently implementing and signed up with OpenPEPPOL | |
| Does the two access points in the 4 corner model not need to have bilateral agreements then? | Good question - yes, they still need to have agreements about transmission in place, but once connected you are basically connected to all. You get your certificate by signing up to the PEPPOL TIA (Transport Infrastructure Agreement) and once a service provider has this, he/she is then verified within the network. | |
| Can the city of Zagreb then have more than one service provider for receiving invoices? | Only if they use more than one GLN number to identify which entity to send to |
...