Navigation path

Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cambodia
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia

Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cambodia
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia


   Infocentre

Published: 23 February 2017  
Related theme(s) and subtheme(s)
EnergyNuclear fission
Environment
Innovation
Research policySeventh Framework Programme
Countries involved in the project described in the article
Bulgaria  |  Czech Republic  |  Finland  |  France  |  Germany  |  Hungary  |  Poland  |  Romania  |  Slovakia  |  Slovenia  |  Sweden  |  United Kingdom
Add to PDF "basket"

Nuclear issues: who decides?

An EU-funded project has empowered local communities and stakeholders in radioactive waste disposal decision-making. IPPA uses participatory approaches to improve public involvement in nuclear issues in Central and Eastern Europe.

image of nuclear power plant

© Daniel-Prudek - fotolia.com

When it comes to discussing contentious issues such as radioactive waste disposal, many stakeholders, including those in the local community, would like to be involved in the decision-making. With this in mind, the EU-funded IPPA research project was launched in 2011 to foster stakeholder participation in such procedures in Central and Eastern Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia and Romania.

Participatory approaches can be useful for various reasons: they use a bottom-up approach to decision-making, incorporating different views and opinions and encouraging cross-border collaboration and sharing best practices between experts. Such an approach is particularly relevant to issues affecting certain security-related, social and environmental factors – radioactive waste disposal, for example.

Sharpest tools in the box

The IPPA project set out to engage as many parties as possible in this process by creating an online toolbox for use in stakeholder engagement activities. This toolbox is available online for any interested group of stakeholders on any subject, along with guidelines and other help to achieve successful stakeholder engagement.

IPPA also explored how negotiations on compensation and added value can be implemented at local level in a bid to empower stakeholders like developers and local communities. The project identified ways of bringing nuclear, geological and societal experts together with local politicians through round-table discussions and consultancy to ensure that everyone with a stake in the decision had a say in it, too.

This kind of multi-stakeholder approach and “public involvement in decision-making processes should be seen in the context of a wider perspective of implementation of a nuclear programme”, explains project coordinator Kjell Andersson. The IPPA method encourages technical experts and decision-makers to take broader social perspectives and opinions into account by creating ‘safe spaces’ for dialogue among stakeholders.

Andersson acknowledges that IPPA has encountered many challenges, in particular, stakeholder wariness of such participation and engagement. However, although overcoming such challenges is essential to successful engagement, IPPA has shown that the benefits usually outweigh the challenges.

Catalyst for change

One particularly successful application of the IPPA approach involved the ongoing development of a radioactive waste disposal site deep underground in the Czech Republic. IPPA was a catalyst for setting up activities under the national ‘Working group for dialogue’, sharing relevant experiences between stakeholders and exchanging international feedback and insight, which made it one of the crucial “unifying elements of the Working Group in critical situations”, says Andersson. This helped the group to grow and prosper, its progress proving that the well-functioning project approaches can flourish even in complex circumstances.

The IPPA project has led to more inclusive decision-making in the field of radioactive waste disposal. Its success has also aroused interest in participatory approaches in other contentious energy-related issues.

Finally, the project has advanced the call to include social and socio-economic contributions in decision-making during nuclear installation site-selection processes across the EU. Andersson hails this as a success, explaining that IPPA has “led to increased awareness of the need for new approaches to participation and openness”, which has already “made a difference in a number of situations such as in Poland and Czech Republic and has the potential for similar achievements in other countries”.

IPPA’s findings mark substantial progress in the future involvement of broader sections of society in decision-making in energy and related sectors. This will be crucial in securing a sustainable future for Europe’s citizens, its environment and its resources.

Project details

  • Project acronym: IPPA
  • Participants: Sweden (Coordinator), Czech Republic, UK, Finland, Germany, Slovakia, France, Poland, Slovenia, Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria
  • Project N°: 269849
  • Total costs: € 2 398 335
  • EU contribution: € 1 599 988
  • Duration: January 2011 – December 2013

See also

 

Convert article(s) to PDF

No article selected


loading


Search articles

Notes:
To restrict search results to articles in the Information Centre, i.e. this site, use this search box rather than the one at the top of the page.

After searching, you can expand the results to include the whole Research and Innovation web site, or another section of it, or all Europa, afterwards without searching again.

Please note that new content may take a few days to be indexed by the search engine and therefore to appear in the results.

Print Version
Share this article
See also
Project website
Project details




  Top   Research Information Center
 
Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cambodia
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia

Countries
Countries
  Algeria
  Argentina
  Australia
  Austria
  Bangladesh
  Belarus
  Belgium
  Benin
  Bolivia
  Botswana
  Brazil
  Bulgaria
  Burkina Faso
  Cambodia
  Cameroon
  Canada
  Cape Verde
  Chile
  China
  Colombia
  Costa Rica
  Croatia
  Cyprus
  Czech Republic
  Denmark
  Ecuador
  Egypt
  Estonia
  Ethiopia
  Finland
  France
  Gambia
  Georgia