Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (SURS).


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia (SURS).

1.2. Contact organisation unit

 Demography and Social Statistics Division, Social Services Statistics Section

 

1.5. Contact mail address

Litostrojska cesta 54, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenija


2. Metadata update Top
09/11/2023
2.1. Metadata last certified 09/11/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 09/11/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 09/11/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consists of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing units classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Revision 2).

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental DevelopmentThe Measurement of ScientificTechnological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics.

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 1197/2020 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

3.2. Classification system
  • The local unit for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics;
  • The distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) are based on Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS);
  • The fields of research and development are based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 Not aplicable (NA)  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D FM`s definition is in used.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD) FORD classification refers to six fields of research and development: Natural sciences, Engineering and Technology, Medical and Health Sciences, Agricultural Sciences, Social Sciences and Humanities. NSE and SSH are available separately.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS) From reference year 2017 onwards socio-economic objectives are no longer monitored due to high reporting burden and lack of national interest.
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector  In line with SNA standards and FM 2015 recommendations.
Hospitals and clinics  University hospitals and medical centres associated with higher education institutions are included in HES, other hospitals and medical centres are included in the GOV.
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to BES  In the BES sector are not included units that primery not belong to it. 
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities

Management and administration support:

Specific R&D management and administration support: Specific R&D management and administration supports, which are closely associated with R&D projects, are included in R&D personnel and in R&D current expenditure.
Indirect R&D management and administration: Indirect R&D management and administration both are not included in R&D personnel, but their corresponding costs are included in other current expenditure as overheads.

Library:

Unit specific libraries: The purchase of books, magazines for unit specific libraries is included in other current expenditure. The purchase of buildings is included in capital expenditure. The personnel employed in these libraries are included in other R&D personnel. Their labour costs are included in current R&D expenditure.
Central libraries: Central libraries are included in R&D.

Computing departments:

Unit-specific computing departments: Computer services related directly to R&D are included in R&D. Corresponding personnel is included in other R&D personnel, their labour costs are included in current R&D expenditure.
Central computing departments: Central computing departments are not included in R&D.
Other ancillary services: Other ancillary services (security, maintenance, cleaning, etc.) are included in other current expenditure as overheads.

External R&D personnel The coverage of external R&D personnel is in line with FM recommendations. Self-employed consultants, employees of other units hired as R&D consultants, doctoral/master`s but only if they are on the university payroll or if they are employed as university assistants or as other scientific staff with the main purpose of working in research projects.
Clinical trials Clinical trials phases 1, 2 and 3 are treated as R&D activities, while phase 4 of clinical trials is not. Phase 4 of clinical trials is not included in R&D, except in cases that contribute to further scientific of technological advances. However, in the methodological guidelines for reporting units there are no special instructions about it.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability Receipts and payments from abroad (i.e. Rest of the World) by sector are available.
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability Payments to abroad by sector are available. Extramural R&D expenditures are inquired about and can be distinguished for institutions abroad by the following categories: to foreign affiliates, to other enterprises, to foreign universities and research institutions of HES, to other PNP research organisations, to international organisations and to others.
Intramural R&D expenditure in foreign-controlled enterprises – coverage  R&D expenditures of foreign affiliates are not covered, except in cases if foreign affiliates are funded nationally.
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit enterprise) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes.

Data on extramural R&D expenditures are available and can be distinguished according to following categories:

- domestic: to small enterprises, to medium-sized enterprises, to large enterprises, to public research institutions (without institutions of HES), public higher education institutions, others,
- foreign: (i.e. institutions abroad): to foreign affiliates, to other enterprises, to foreign univerities and research institutions of HES, to other private-non profit research organisations, to international organisations, to others.

Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  In the questionnaire is included seperate question/table on extramural R&D expenditure and additional clarifications for reporting units. 
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  Some difficulties were detected, mainly for the borderline cases. 
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Source of funds R&D expenditures are classified by source of funds into five sectors: business enterprise, government, higher education, private non-profit and abroad. All these categories are broken down into sub-categories.
Type of R&D All three types of R&D (basic research, applied research and experimental development) are included.
Type of costs In line with FM 2015 four types of costs are distinguished: labour costs, other current costs and capital expenditures (land and buildings, instruments and equipments, capitalised computer software and other intellectual property products). All these categories are broken down into sub-categories.
Economic activity of the unit Units are classified according to the NACE Rev. 2 and ISIC classifications.
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72) Units are classified according to the NACE Rev. 2 and ISIC classifications.
Product field Not used.
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure It is covered for all sectors of performance.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Function Data on R&D personnel by occupation (group) (researcher, technicians and equivalent staff, other  supporting staff) in head counts (HC) and sex are available.
Qualification Data on R&D personnel by qualification (level) (doctoral or equivalent, short cycle tertiary, bachelor, master or equivalent, other level of education) in head counts (HC) and sex are available for all occupation groups.
Age Data on R&D personnel by age (group) in head counts (HC) are available only for researchers.
Citizenship Data on R&D personnel by citizenship (group) in head counts (HC) are available only for researchers.
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Function Data on R&D personnel by occupation (group) (researcher, technicians and equivalent staff, other  supporting staff) in full time equivalents (FTE) and sex are available.
Qualification Data on R&D personnel by qualification in full time equivalents (FTE) are not available.
Age Data on R&D personnel by age (group) in full time equivalents (FTE) are not available.
Citizenship Data on R&D personnel by citizenship (group) in full time equivalents (FTE) are not available.
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

There are some general examples (formulas) for FTE calculation:

  • researcher working full-time (100%) in R&D: 1x1=1 FTE
  • 3 researchers working half-time (50%) in R&D: 3x0.5=1.5 FTE
  • 2 researchers working whole year 20% part-time in R&D: 2x0.2=0.4
  • researcher working half a year full-time (100%): 1x(6/12)x1=0.5 FTE


2 researchers working 8 months a quarter (25%) of their working time in R&D: 2x(8/12)x0.25=0.33 FTE

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 R&D personnel by occupation, qualification and sex  HC  Yearly
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for BERD is the enterprise as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993– if there are deviations please explain.

Business entities, their subsidiaries and other divisions of business entities are defined as statistical units regarding their R&D activity. If the principal economic activity of business entity is R&D, then statistical unit is business entity as a whole. If the principal economic activity of business entity is not R&D, then statistical unit is part of business entity performing R&D activity. However, in both cases the reporting unit is business entity (enterprise).

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some enterprises for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population National target population includes all potential R&D performing units (in all branches and size classes) in the Republic of Slovenia belonging to business enterprise sector.  Not applicable.
Estimation of the target population size 2,713  
Size cut-off point All size classes are included.  
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services) Size classes are covered in line with FM 2015 recommendations.  
NACE/ISIC classes covered NACE/ISIC classes are covered in line with FM 2015 recommendations.  
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population Several sources are used for defining the frame population.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer Data sources used for identifying (known or supposed) R&D performers are:
  • Statistical Business Register (Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia) - business entities, their subsidiaries and other divisions of business entities, registered for performing R&D activities (as covered by NACE Rev. 2 Division 72);
  • List of recipients of state aid for investment in R&D (Ministry of Finance);
  • List of business entities liable to general and regional tax incentives for R&D investments (Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia);
  • The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) (Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia);
  • Slovenian Current Research Information System (SICRIS) (Slovenian Research Agency).
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D There is no any special method applied for inclusions R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D.
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  3
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population Within the process of updating the target population certain units are (systematically) excluded:
  • units operating regularly, but were not R&D active for three consecutive years;
  • ineligible units (i.e. units deleted from the Business Register; units registered for performing R&D activities (NACE Rev. 72) with fewer than 2 persons in paid employment and were not among the recipients of state aid for R&D investments) or were not liable to any tax incentives for R&D investments).
Estimation of the frame population  2713

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D.

3.7. Reference area

Not requested. R&D statistics cover national and regional data.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Expenditure: Euro (€)

R&D personnel: number of persons (HC), full time equivalent (FTE)


5. Reference Period Top

Reference period is 2021.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. Regulation No 2020/1197 sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.

Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  mandatory
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation Production of national R&D statistics is conducted on the basis of the National Statistics Act (OJ RS, No 45/95 and No 9/01) and on the basis of the current Annual Programme of Statistical Surveys (LPSR) (available only in Slovene).
Legal acts  


N/A

Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts) Yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts) Obligation to collect data and obligation of respondents to transmit R&D data to SURS.
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts) Yes, it is laid down in the National Statistics Act (OJ RS, No 45/95 and No 9/01) and in the current Annual Programme of Statistical Surveys (LPSR). Collected data may only be used for statistical purposes.
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts) Individual data collected by national statistics for statistical processing are strictly confidential and can be used exclusively for statistical purposes. SURS enables researchers to access data for the purpose of research in line with National Statistics Act.
Planned changes of legislation Changes are not planned.
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 The National Statistics Act (hereinafter the ZDSta) stipulates within fundamental principles of national statistics in Article 2 that “national statistics shall be implemented on the principles of … confidentiality …”.

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

All employees are obliged to protect the content of personal and individual data and data on reporting units which they learn during their work as official secrecy. All employees sign a statement of data protection and thus confirm that they are informed about the issue. The obligation to protect the official secrecy continues after the termination of employment.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

All R&D data collected are treated as confidential and are used only for statistical purposes. By following general statistical confidentiality framework used in SURS, statistics can be published only in aggregate form, i.e. in a manner that does not allow recognition of the unit to which data relate. Identifiable information can be published only exceptionally in cases where the unit gives its written consent to publish it. More information on statistical confidentiality is available at https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/FundamentalPrinciples/StatConf.

With data for 2021 statistical data protection was also introduced to the survey. Same applies to the data delivered to Eurostat. Confidential cells are flagged with "C" (in English) or "Z" in Slovenian).


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Release calendar is publicly accessible. 

8.2. Release calendar access

Release calendar is publicly accessible. 

8.3. Release policy - user access

All data and metadata information are published and are accessible to users through various channels; among them is the most important website. The information on the website is available free of charge and is also available at English, for the widest possible use that is actively promoted.

The release policy deternines the dissemination of statistical data to all users at the same time.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

The data are published yearly. The data are published:

  • in November - preliminary (P),
  • in March - final (F).


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y Data on R&D are published online in the:
Ad-hoc releases  N  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y  online
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Data on R&D are published at a more detailed level in the SiStat database.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information Microdata are not disseminated. They can only be accessed in the secure room or via remote access. SURS prepares individual microdata databases by removing identifiers that could with large probability disclose the observed unit. More information on microdata access is available at https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/en/StaticPages/Index/For-Researchers.
Access cost policy None
Micro-data anonymisation rules SURS enables researchers to access micro-data for the purpose of research with the option of linking them with other data in a secure environment. The use of the data is according to the data sensitivity in the following ways: access in SURS's secure room, remote access via the internet and using statistically protected microdata on a portable medium.
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y  Aggregate figures Data on R&D are published in the First Release and at a more detailed level in the SiStat database.
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y  Aggregate figures  
Other  N    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Methodological materials on SURS’s website are available at https://www.stat.si/statweb/en/Methods/QuestionnairesMethodologicalExplanationsQualityReports.

Theme: Development and Technology, Subtheme: Research, Development and Innovation

  • Quality report for the survey:
    • Raziskovalno-razvojna dejavnost pri izvajalcih (R-RD-IZV)

Theme: Development and Technology, Subtheme: Research, Development and Innovation

  • Methodological explanations:
    • Research and development activity by performers (R-RD-IZV)
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)  Information that is available to R&D data is metadata, graphs, methodological explanation and quality reports.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues Rarely, usually considering differences between GBARD and GERD data.
Measures to increase clarity Yes, we constantly update and improve the methodological explanations according to user's feedback.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  The clarity of the accompanying information to the data is good.


11. Quality management Top

Quality management is defined as systems and frameworks in place within an organisation to manage the quality of statistical products and processes. 

11.1. Quality assurance

Check 11.2.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Overall quality of R&D statistics is good.

The coverage of reporting units is full. R&D statistics domain follow general quality management activities used in SURS (including the European Statistics Code of Practice and the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics). Detailed methodological instructions for completing questionnaire are available. Data validation is performed in collaboration with reporting units. Discussion of results, substantive matters and key issues are points on the agenda or the subjects under discussion of the Research and Development, and Technology Statistics Advisory Committee.

However, there are still some aspects to be improved at R&D statistics. Despite the available methodological guidelines and instructions reporting units still have some problems with recognizing their R&D performance, understanding the R&D definitions, identifying an capturing the real/proper R&D content of activities and corresponding items. Most of the reporting units do not have records tailored to survey reporting, so they often make use of estimates without considering the substantive relevance between the items.

In the R&D statistics domain’s quality assurance activities are guaranteed through:

  • clear and well-structured survey questionnaire with detailed methodological instructions for its completion;
  • single point for communicating with business entities regarding the submission of data (i.e. Contact Center);
  • good competences of Call Center staff and personnel responsible for data editing (training before the questionnaires are sent to the reporting units);
  • good cooperation with the reporting units during data collection phase;
  • computer control programs for input data;
  • feedback from key reporting units and data users;

continuous updating and improvement of methodological instructions in the light of past experience.


12. Relevance Top

Relevance is the degree to which statistics meet current and potential users’ needs. It includes the production of all needed statistics and the extent to which concepts used (definitions, classifications etc.) reflect user needs. The aim is to describe the extent to which the statistics are useful to, and used by, the broadest array of users. For this purpose, statisticians need to compile information, firstly about their users (who they are, how many they are, how important is each one of them), secondly on their needs, and finally to assess how far these needs are met.

12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
1-Institutions at national level State administration (Government, Prime minister, Ministries, Government offices), representative bodies, agencies and other public bodies, Bank of Slovenia, bodies of local communities Detailed data on scope and key trends of Slovenian R&D performance for R&D and innovation and education policy decisions and strategy planning or for in-depth analysis, key R&D indicators
1-Institutions at European level European Commission, Council European research policy and international benchmarking
1-International organizations OECD International benchmarking
2-Social actors Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, Chamber of Commerce and Industry Key features of Slovenian R&D performance with international comparison for specific purposes (negotiating, budgeting)
3-Media National media Key features of Slovenian R&D performance with international comparison for general public
4-Researchers and students Research institutes, research centres and other research organizations (including registered researchers) Statistics, in-depth analysis, access to microdata
4-Researchers and students Education institutions (universities, faculties) Data for self-estimates and future planning
5-Enterprises or businesses Business enterprises Data for market analysis, R&D performance in their primary activity

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction SURS measured general user satisfaction for the last time in 2018. Respondents assessed general satisfaction with SURS with the average score of 7.5 (on a scale from 1 – disagree completely to 10 – agree completely).
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics It is not.
Short description of the feedback received R&D statistics falls within the scope of the Statistical Advisory Committee on Research and Development Activities and Technologies. The last meeting of the Committee was held on 19 October 2021. More information on the operation of the Committe is available on the following website https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/NationalStatistics/AdvCommitteesDescription/83 (in Slovene only).

Statistical data protection was included with data for 2021 to the R-RD-IZV survey (introduced from reference year 2017).

12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available.

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  x          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  x          
Optional data on R&D expenditure            
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  x          
Optional data on R&D personnel            
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  x          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y  Annual        
Type of R&D  Y  Annual        
Type of costs  Y  Annual        
Socioeconomic objective  N  Does not apply        
Region  Y  Annual        
FORD  Y  Annual        
Type of institution  N  Does not apply        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex Y Annual        
Function Y Annual         
Qualification N Does not apply        
Age N Does not apply        
Citizenship Does not apply         
Region Y Annual         
FORD Annual          
Type of institution Does not apply        
Economic activity Y Annual          
Product field N Does not apply        
Employment size class Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex Y Annual        
Function Y Annual         
Qualification N Does not apply         
Age Does not apply         
Citizenship Does not apply         
Region Annual         
FORD Annual        
Type of institution Does not apply         
Economic activity Annual        
Product field Does not apply         
Employment size class Annual         

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
Does not apply.          
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  -  4  1  2  3   -/+
Total R&D personnel in FTE  -  4  1  2  3   -/+
Researchers in FTE  -  4  1  2  3   -/+

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure    X      
Total R&D personnel in FTE    X      
Researchers in FTE    X      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation: CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Does not apply.

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.
R&D personnel (FTE)  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250- and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.
R&D personnel (FTE)  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.  Does not apply.
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 The coverage errors were not detected.

Some reporting units actively engaged in the R&D activity in the previous year that fully outsourced R&D activity in the reference period were included.

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect: /

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

 

The coverage errors were not detected. 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)      
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES) Reporting units actively engaged in the R&D activity in the previous year that fully outsourced R&D activity in the reference period.    
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

Does not apply to any of this category.

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)          
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)          
Misclassification rate          
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)          
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)          
Misclassification rate          
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Data error detection controls are focused on the consistency of the totals derived from different breakdowns. In case an important intra-annual change in figures is identified, one or more contacts with the reporting unit are made in order to obtain additional explanatory notes on data deviation or to arrange data retransmission.

The main reasons that cause measurement errors are: the questionnaire is filled in by several persons or organisational units or person that is not so informed on R&D projects, non-compliance with the methodological instructions, subjective and often unreliable and inconsistent assessment of funds as data can not be derived directly from reporting unit's records.

 b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

If some errors are detected by the person responsible at SURS for data editing, it is first determined whether an error is remedied without contacting the reporting units, or the error is unclear and requires additional explanations form the reporting units. The reporting unit is always contacted when it is not clear from the reported data whether they are correct or not. Is also applies to the reporting unit when the reported data are very different form the data reported by the same reporting units for previous years.

In order to reduce the number of errors, it is very important that we regularly get feedback from reporting units by recontacting them. It is important to "educate" persons responsible for reporting, provide them methodological support, the reporting units in order to correctly and accurately fill in the questionnaire. The number of measurement errors would be reduced by using a clear, comprehensible questionnaire and clear, short and precise methodological guidelines for completing it.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
 

0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional)

10-49 employees and self-employed persons

50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  /  /  /  /  /
Total number of units in the sample  /  /  /  /  /
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  /  /  /  /  /
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)  /  /  /  /  /
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE

 

Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  /   /   /
Total number of units in the sample  /   /   /
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  /   /   /
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)  /   /   /

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Units that did not submit data on time are reminded twice by electronic reminder, and all key units are additionally reminded by telephone call.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  So far we have not conducted any non-response survey at R&D statistics.
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  
Data collection method employed  
Response rate of this type of survey  
The main reasons of non-response identified  Main reason of non-response is that reporting unit did not carry out R&D activities in the reference period.
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) As a result of the possibility of cooperation with the reporting units already in the data collection phase, the data collected are of very good quality and require little additional editing (imputation is used exceptionally). As a result of the possibility of cooperation with the reporting units already in the data collection phase, the data collected are of very good quality and require little additional editing (imputation is used exceptionally).  As a result of the possibility of cooperation with the reporting units already in the data collection phase, the data collected are of very good quality and require little additional editing (imputation is used exceptionally).
Imputation (Y/N)  N  N  N
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used      
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  Not available
Total R&D personnel in FTE  Not available
Researchers in FTE  Not available
13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied For data entry we use Blaise software (completed questionnaires sent by eSTAT are transferred to Blaise). Data entry errors are minimize by means of consisteny controls on key aggregates added to the survey questionnaire (in Excel form) and by means of processing software by visual checking.
Estimates of data entry errors Not known.
Variables for which coding was performed Not relevant.
Estimates of coding errors Not relevant.
Editing process and method Microdata editing is done by visual control in the first step and by logical control through the Blaise program in the second step. Before the completed questionnaires go to the data entry, the Enterprise Cooperation Section carries out the initial data control (i.e. visual control). Since the survey questionnaire is comprehensive and complex in content, a considerable part of questionnaires is filled in partially or inadequately. Pre-trained analysts resolve most of missing data or incompletely fulfilled items in cooperation with reporting units in the visual control phase. Then data are captured into the Blaise program, followed by the computer logical control. The computer control programs for input data cover key elementary control mechanisms (e.g. consistency of (sub)totals, matching content-related items, outsized deviations compared to the previous years, obligatory items etc.), which automatically perform logical control of input data. The data are checked by means of arithmetical and logical controls used within individual table and between tables. Diverse ratios are derived to parallel R&D personnel (HC and FTE) and corresponding expenditure figures.
Procedure used to correct errors In the case of logical inconsistencies, suspicious data values, or missing values, the reporting unit is re-contacted by phone or e-mail for value clarification, validation or adjustment. In cases of detected errors, it is initially determined whether the error can be resolved without contacting the reporting unit or not. The reporting unit is always re-contacted when it is not feasible to conclude whether reported value is a reasonable one or merely an error. Due to good collaboration with the reporting units already in the time of data collection, the data collected are of very good quality and involve little further editing (imputation is used exceptionally).
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

a) End of reference period: 31 December 2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 5 November 2022

c) Lag (days): T +10

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31. December 2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 2 March 2023

c) Lag (days): T +14

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 14
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months) 10 10 
Delay (days) 
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top

Comparability aims at measuring the impact of differences in applied statistical concepts and definitions on the comparison of statistics between geographical areas, non-geographical domains or over time. It is the extent to which differences between statistics are attributed to differences between the true values of the statistical characteristics.
The factors that may cause two statistical figures to lose comparability are attributes of the surveys that produce them. These attributes may be grouped into two major categories: (a) concepts of the survey and (b) measurement / estimation methodology.
The two following sections present lists of key attributes. Information on some of the attributes will have already been reported in previous sections of this report but they are repeated here for completeness of the lists. We provide references to the relevant earlier sections and you do not need to provide the information again.

The coherence of statistics is their adequacy to be reliably combined in different ways and for various uses. It is, however, generally easier to show cases of incoherence than to prove coherence.

When originating from a single source, statistics are coherent in that elementary concepts can be combined reliably in more complex ways. When originating from different sources, and in particular from statistical surveys of different frequencies, statistics are coherent insofar as they are based on common definitions, classifications and methodological standards. The messages that statistics convey to users will then clearly relate to each other, or at least will not contradict each other. The coherence between statistics is orientated towards the comparison of different statistics, which are generally produced in different ways and for different primary uses.

The definition of coherence: The extent to which the statistical characteristics confirm with those in other statistics such that the statistics can be expected to be used together in conjunction with, or as an alternative to.

15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

National R&D statistics is produced in line with the Frascati methodology.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2). No  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39.

No 

 
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat’s EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25 No   
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2). No   
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59. No   
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No  
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18 No   
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No   
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities No  
Data collection method No  
Cooperation with respondents No  
Follow-up of non-respondents NA   
Data processing methods No  
Treatment of non-response No   
Data weighting No  
Variance estimation NA  
Data compilation of final and preliminary data No  
Survey type No  
Sample design No  
Survey questionnaire No  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).

  Function    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).

  Qualification    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).
R&D personnel (FTE)    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).
  Function    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).
  Qualification    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).
R&D expenditure    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).

2017–2019 data revision
Due to the inconsistent allocation[1] of data on expenditure on research and development by sources of funding by some reporting units of the business sector, in March 2022 we published together with the data for the reference year 2020 the data of the unplanned revision of R&D expenditure by sources of funding for the 2017–2019 period. The total amount of funding for R&D for these years remained unchanged and thus comparable in time. The revision affected the allocation of funds by sources of funding - a decrease in the volume of financial resources for R&D by companies and an increase in the volume of financial resources from abroad. For these two types of funding sources, the data from 2017 onwards are therefore not comparable with previous years.
[1] Not adequate with the OECD Frascati manual issued in 2015.

Source of funds    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).
Type of costs    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).
Type of R&D    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).
Other    2011, 2017 With the data for 2011 new administrative sources were introduced in the survey on R&D, which enabled additional identification of (potential) R&D performers and thus improved sample unit coverage. At the same time, weighting adjustment for non-response was also introduced in the survey on R&D. By both reasons values of R&D activity in all sectors of performance increased.

With data for 2017 some methodological changes were introduced in the R&D survey as a result of the Frascati methodology harmonisation and at the same time statistical data protection was also introduced to the R&D survey. Following methodological changes were introduced:

  • the extended definition of the higher education sector (in addition to higher education institutions, higher vocational institutions are included) is applied,
  • private researchers are involved in a part of the BES (previously part of the PNP),
  • non-profit institutions providing services for households (S.15) are involved in a part of the PNP (previously part of the BES),
  • in the presentation of R&D personnel in the head counts (HC), both internal and external R&D personnel are included (previously only internal R&D personnel),
  • data on the occupation of R&D personnel have three categories (researchers, technicians and equivalent staff, other supporting staff), while in previous years occupation referred to five categories (researchers, professional staff, technical staff, management personnel, other supporting staff).

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Data are produced in the same way every year.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.  Intramural R & D expenditure (code 230101 in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197) and R & D personnel (code 230201) are surveyed also in foreign-controlled EU enterprises statistics (inward FATS).

The Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12) (europa.eu) also collects the R&D expenditure of enterprises that form the coverage of the CIS2020 survey. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not available.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
 NA  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS
Restricted from publication
15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10) 1.116.930  

17.451

 

11.070

Final data (delivered T+18)  

1.112.490

17.396

11.067

Difference (of final data)  -4.440  -55 -3
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  Not available
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  Not available

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  Not separately available.  Not separately available.
Data collection costs  Not separately available.  Not separately available.
Other costs  Not separately available.  Not separately available.
Total costs  Not separately available.  Not separately available.
Comments on costs
 Not available only for BES sector.

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  2271  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  101 min  
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)    
Total cost    

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  Research and development activity by performers (R-RD-IZV).
Type of survey  Census survey among all enterprises known or supposed to perform R&D.
Combination of sample survey and census data  Does not apply.
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  Does not apply.
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  Does not apply.
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  Does not apply.
Variables the survey contributes to  All R&D mandatory variables and almost all optional variables requested the regulation.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit Enterprise    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only) Does not apply    
Stratification variable classes Does not apply    
Population size      
Planned sample size 2713    
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only) Does not apply    
Survey frame  
  • Statistical Business Register (Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia) - business entities, their subsidiaries and other divisions of business entities, registered for performing R&D activities (as covered by NACE Rev. 2 Division 72),
  • List of recipients of state aid for investment in R&D (Ministry of Finance),
  • List of business entities liable to general and regional tax incentives for R&D investments (Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia),
  • The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) (Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia),
  • Slovenian Current Research Information System (SICRIS) (Slovenian Research Agency) units,
  • The Bank of Slovenia.
 
Sample design /    
Sample size /    
Survey frame quality  Coverage of the reference population is good.    
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  Does not apply.
Description of collected data / statistics  Does not apply.
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  Does not apply.
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum)  
Mode of data collection The R-RD-IZV survey is obligatory according to the National Statistics Act (OJ RS, No. 45/95 and 9/01) and Annual Programme of Statistical Surveys (LPSR) (only in Slovene).

Data are collected using survey questionnaire in the Excel form sent via eSTAT web application for electronic data reporting when completed. The deadline for transmitting (completed) survey questionnaire is approximately three weeks after the questionnaires are released out. If there exists an objective reason, then the deadline for submitting the data may be extended. In addition to electronic data reporting via eSTAT, the survey questionnaire can also be sent via e-mail address designed for the purpose of sending data (porocanje.surs@gov.si). However, there are also exceptions that provide a printed version of the completed survey questionnaire.

Units that did not submit data on time are reminded twice by electronic reminder, and all key units are additionally reminded by telephone call.

In the Enterprise Cooperation Section a single point for communicating with business entities regarding the submission of data is established (i.e. Contact Center). Staff at the Contact Center assists the data providers with general technical and substantive issues, while the content-specific questions are redirected to the person responsible for the R-RD-IZV survey. Before the data collection begins, training for the Call Center is organised.

Incentives used for increasing response 2x reminders, phone calls
Follow-up of non-respondents No
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed) No 
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility) 86 %
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods) Non-response analysis is not done.
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:

Questionnaire (only in Slovene) is available at https://www.stat.si/StatWeb/File/DocSysFile/11889.
Methodological explanation is available at https://www.stat.si/statweb/File/DocSysFile/9533/23-086-1-MP.pdf.

Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English: Methodological explanation is available at https://www.stat.si/statweb/File/DocSysFile/9534/23-086-1-ME.pdf.
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  
18.4. Data validation

Validation activities are: comparing the statistics with previous cycles, investigating inconsistencies in the statistics; performing micro data editing.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

 

 

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more  employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  0  0  0  0
R&D personnel (FTE)  0  0  0  0  0

Does not apply.

18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  0  0  0
R&D personnel (FTE)  0  0  0

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

Does not apply.

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  NA
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  NA
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data R&D performers are classified to the statistical and cohesion region on the basis of the address information (i.e. municipality) at which it is registered in Statistical Business Register. In cases where a unit in the entity reports data for the whole enterprise, the address of the headquarters is usually taken into account when deriving regional data.
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items NA
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures Depreciation is excluded from R&D expenditures.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics No differences between national and FM 2015 classifications.
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method With the data for reference year 2011 weighting for unit non-response was introduced. The unit non-response is calculated by the ratio between the sample size and the sum of the responses and the ineligible units. Weights are calculated according to the strata, which are determined by the economic activity and the size of enterprise (considering the number of persons employed).
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description) The Statistical Business Register is used as a source for variables used for weighting.
Variables used for weighting Economic activity, size of enterprise
Calibration method and the software used Does not apply.
Estimation Does not apply.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top

With the final data of R&D we implementeted new definition of enterprises. Definition is "Enterprise is legal or natural persons which had turnover or employees or investments and were therefore active during at least a part of the reference period. An enterprise may consist of several ownership-related legal persons, as long as they operate on the market as one independent enterprise". Slovenia is really small country therefore the differences were not seen so much in data. 

**2017–2019 data revision**
Due to the inconsistent allocation[1] of data on expenditure on research and development by sources of funding by some reporting units of the business sector, in March 2022 we published together with the data for the reference year 2020 the data of the unplanned revision of R&D expenditure by sources of funding for the 2017–2019 period. The total amount of funding for R&D for these years remained unchanged and thus comparable in time. The revision affected the allocation of funds by sources of funding - a decrease in the volume of financial resources for R&D by companies and an increase in the volume of financial resources from abroad. For these two types of funding sources, the data from 2017 onwards are therefore not comparable with previous years.
[1] Not adequate with the OECD Frascati manual issued in 2015


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top