Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: National Statistics Office (NSO)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

National Statistics Office (NSO)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Business Register, Research and Innovation Unit

1.5. Contact mail address

National Statistics Office

Business Register, Research and Innovation Unit

Lascaris

Valletta

VLT 2000

Malta


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 27/10/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 27/10/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 27/10/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The “enterprise” is defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing enterprises classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Rev.2).

 

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics. (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

 

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing  Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 nil  nil
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D Corresponds to the Frascati Manual
Fields of Research and Development (FORD) NSE and SSH are equally covered and separately available 
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector Corresponds to the Frascati Manual
Hospitals and clinics  
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to BES  
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities Corresponds to the Frascati Manual
External R&D personnel Corresponds to the Frascati Manual
Clinical trials Corresponds to the Frascati Manual
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  The sources of funds in the Frascati Manual are identified in the R&D survey
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  Not available
Intramural R&D expenditure in foreign-controlled enterprises – coverage   Not covered
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit enterprise) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  Extramural R&D expenditure is available every two years as it is specifically requested in the Community Innovation Survey
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar year
Source of funds  All sources of funds are distinguished
Type of R&D  The 3 types of R&D are distinguished
Type of costs  The types of costs according to the Frascati Manual are distinguished
Economic activity of the unit  No deviations
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72)   Data obtained through survey
Product field  In case of any difficulties companies are contacted by email or phone 
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  Not applicable to Malta
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  Calendar year
Function  No difficulties encountered
Qualification  No difficulties encountered
Age  Age is asked for researchers only
Citizenship  Citizenship is asked for researchers only
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Calendar year
Function  No difficulties encountered
Qualification  No difficulties encountered
Age  Age is not asked in the survey
Citizenship  Citizenship is not asked in the survey
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

2 part timer add up to 1 full time

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 We have such data by males and females, split by full and part time, by occupation and also by personnel  Both in HC and FTE  Yearly
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for BERD is the enterprise as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993– if there are deviations please explain.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some enterprises for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  All known R&D performing enterprises regardless of their amount of involvement in R&D  
Estimation of the target population size  369  
Size cut-off point Not applicable   
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services)  All  
NACE/ISIC classes covered  All  
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population  The frame population for business statistics is the official business register - as defined by the Regulation (EC) No 177/2008 - including all the business enterprises active in the reference period.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer  The main identifier is the CIS which is a census of enterprises with 10 or more employees. Also, the tax department, Malta Council for Science and Technology (MCST) and Malta Enterprise are used to identify potential R&D enterprises.
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  Yes, every two years through the CIS which is a census of enterprises with 10 or more employees.
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  17 enterprises were newly identified and included in the 2021 target population vis a vis the 2020 target population
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  1 enterprise was available in the 2020 target population but not included in the 2021 target population. This is due to companies which ceased operations.
Estimation of the frame population  The size of the frame population with reference to the official Business Register was 63244

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

Not requested. R&D statistics cover national and regional data.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

R&D expenditure is available in the following units:

- National currency (Euro) (XDC) in thousands

 

R&D personnel data is available in:

- Full time equivalent (FTE);

- Head count (HC)


5. Reference Period Top

One calendar year


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. Regulation No 2020/1197 sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  Mandatory
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  Malta Statistics Authority Legislation. The R&D statistics is not referred in the this legislation as it is a general legislation.
Legal acts  Malta Statistics Authority Act XXIV of 2000
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts) Obligation to collect data and obligation of respondents to transmit R&D data to the National Statistics Office.
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts) Confidential information is protected and not disclosed
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts) Access of non-confidential data and statistics to third parties organisations or persons is given
Planned changes of legislation No foreseen changes are planned 
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 The general Malta Statistics Authority Legislation is followed

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 Upon employment, all NSO employees are informed of the rules and duties pertaining to confidential information and its treatment. In line with stipulations of the MSA Act, before commencing work, every employee is required to take an oath of secrecy whose text is included in the same Act.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

No particular confidentiality procedure is applied. The enterprise captured in the R&D population are treated as confidential and as such data related to R&D is published since it does not lead to the identification of enterprises.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

An advance release calendar is maintained by the NSO and published on the NSO website. The calendar projects six months of news releases.

8.2. Release calendar access

The News Release calendar is published on the offical website of NSO and can be accessible using the following link: https://nso.gov.mt/calendars/

8.3. Release policy - user access

An internal policy on dissemination is in place to govern the dissemination of official statistics in an impartial, independent, and timely manner, making them available simultaneously to all users.

The NSO's primary channel for the dissemination of official statistics is the NSO website.  Tailored requests for statistical information may also be submitted through the said website. The Office also makes use of social media venues as a platform to communicate with its users and to present its output. The public is free to use, copy and quote the information published provided that the NSO is quoted as the source.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

R&D data statistics is published annually in July


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y  A news release is issued on a yearly basis.
Ad-hoc releases  N  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 N  
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

   

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Stattistics on Research and Development may be found on the Eurostat's database through the following link: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

 

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Micro-data is not accessible to outside users
Access cost policy  No cost on accessing the data
Micro-data anonymisation rules  
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y    
Other      

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Documentation on methodology at national level can be accessed at: https://metadata.nso.gov.mt/reports.aspx?id=26 

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Metadata is available on the NSO website: https://metadata.nso.gov.mt/reports.aspx?id=26
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  No further clarifications are needed
Measures to increase clarity  No
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   Satisfactory


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The NSO ensures the accuracy of data released to the public and prepares clear methodological notes which explain the processes involved in the collection and production of official statistics.

The NSO has developed an internal Quality Management Framework (QMF) which is built on common requirements of the ESS Code of Practice (ESS CoP).  A document was prepared to include a set of general quality guidelines spanning over all statistical domains.  Assuring methodological soundness is an integral part of the QMF, nonetheless, the document spans also on other areas related to institutional aspects.

Every five to seven years, the NSO participates in a Peer Review exercise through which the compliance of its operations with principles of the ESS CoP is assessed by an expert team.  Peer Reviews are indeed part of the European Statistical System (ESS) strategy to implement the ESS CoP.  Each NSI is expected to provide information as requested by a standard self-assessment questionnaire.  Following this an expert team visits the office to meet NSI representatives and main stakeholders.  Peer Reviews result in a compliance report and the listing of a set of Improvement Actions which need to be followed up by the NSI.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The coverage is across all NACE sections and size classes of active known R&D enterprises. The questionnaires and guidelines were sent to the target respondents by email. Questionnaires are vetted individually once received by email. Any missing information is requested via telephone or e-mail. Data is also compared with previous years to ensure consistency of results. Any queries are raised with the enterprise and, if available, with the companies' financial statements.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1 - European level  Eurostat  To compile European Innovation Scoreboard
 1 - National level  Malta Council for Science and Technology  To set out national policy
 1 - National level  Malta Enterprise  To enhance aid
 4 - Researchers and students  Researchers & students  To substantiate their studies

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No national user satisfaction survey was conducted specifically for R&D
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  No national user satisfaction survey was conducted specifially for R&D
Short description of the feedback received  From the feedback we receive, users are satisfied
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Data completeness of both preliminary and final mandatory data is 100% satisfied.

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  x          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  x          
Optional data on R&D expenditure  x          
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  x          
Optional data on R&D personnel  x          
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel    x        

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y - 2005  Annual        
Type of R&D  Y - 2005  Annual        
Type of costs  Y - 2005  Annual        
Socioeconomic objective  Y - 2005  Annual        
Region  Malta NUTS1 N  Annual        
FORD  Y - 2005  Annual        
Type of institution  Y - 2004  Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y - 2004  Annual        
Function  Y - 2002  Annual        
Qualification  Y - 2005  Annual        
Age  Female and total researchers Y - 2013  Annual        
Citizenship  Female and total researchers Y - 2013  Annual        
Region  Malta NUTS 1 N  Annual        
FORD  Y - 2005  Annual        
Type of institution  Y - 2004  Annual        
Economic activity  Y - 2002  Annual        
Product field  Y - 2005  Annual        
Employment size class  Y - 2002  Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y - 2004  Annual        
Function  Y - 2002  Annual        
Qualification  Y - 2005  Annual        
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  Malta NUTS1 N          
FORD  Y - 2005  Annual        
Type of institution  Y - 2004  Annual        
Economic activity  Y - 2002  Annual        
Product field  Y - 2005  Annual        
Employment size class  Y - 2002  Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 Extramural R&D exp  2004  Every two years      
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  Not available  1  2  1  2  1  +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE  Not available  1  2  1  2  1  +
Researchers in FTE  Not available  1  2  1  2  1  +

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure  X        
Total R&D personnel in FTE  X        
Researchers in FTE  X        

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

A census was carried out

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  Not applicable*  Not applicable*
 Not applicable*
R&D personnel (FTE)  Not applicable*  Not applicable*
 Not applicable*

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

 

*A census was carried out

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250- and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  Not applicable*  Not applicable*
 Not applicable*
 Not applicable*
 Not applicable*
R&D personnel (FTE)  Not applicable*  Not applicable*  Not applicable*
 Not applicable*
 Not applicable*

 

* A census was carried out

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

The main identifiers of the active R&D population are: active R&D enterprises from previous rounds, the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), as it addresses a particular question to R&D; and other administrative sources for which enterprises apply to benefit from funds or tax rebates related to R&D.

Enterprises which do not feature in any of the above categories, which however carry out R&D activities, would not be included in the target population, thus resulting in under coverage. Under coverage cannot, however, be quantified.

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)    None  
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)    None  
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)    
     
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  
 
     
Misclassification rate          
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)  
 
 
 
 
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  
 
 
 
 
Misclassification rate          

 

No thresholds are applied in the R&D survey both on employment and NACE coverage. So no issues emerge if an enterprise has an update on employment or NACE code.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Every effort has been made in the questionnaire design and testing to reduce measurement errors. A set of guidelines have been attached to the questionnaire in order to guide the respondents.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 The questionnaire design and testing have been compiled by experienced personnel. Also, the received questionnaires have been vetted by experienced personnel.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
 

0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional)

10-49 employees and self-employed persons

50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  87  110  52  16  265
Total number of units in the sample  146  136  67  20  369
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  0.40  0.19  0.22  0.20  0.28
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)          
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE
  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  79  186  265
Total number of units in the sample  102  267  369
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  0.23  0.30  0.28
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)      

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Three reminders: the first two are sent by email and third being a legal one sent by post, and numerous telephone calls.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  A unit non-response survey was performed. However, the respondents received several reminders to submit the filled in questionnaire.
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  A unit non-response survey was not performed
Data collection method employed  A unit non-response survey was not performed
Response rate of this type of survey  A unit non-response survey was not performed
The main reasons of non-response identified  They do not perform R&D and see the questionnaire as irrelevant for them
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)  0.01%  0.01% 0.01%
Imputation (Y/N)  N N  N
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used      
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  
Total R&D personnel in FTE  
Researchers in FTE  

Data is based on previous year response as to reduce this type of error.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  Data keying
Estimates of data entry errors  Negligible data entry errors are expected since the data is totally processed by a single experienced person from the mailing stage to the reporting stage. Also, the program does not allow data entry errors as each total needs to tally with other sections
Variables for which coding was performed  NACE coding for the R&D activity area and industry served.
Estimates of coding errors  Data is totally processed by a single experienced person from the Statistical Business Register
Editing process and method  No specific data editing made but a company by company approach is used. No editing rates are available.
Procedure used to correct errors  The procedure done during the vetting is that questionnaires are checked as received and if necessary, companies are contacted directly through a telephone conversation or email. Survey non replies are estimated based on the data provided in previous R&D questionnaires as well as data available in the Statistical Business Register, where applicable.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31/12/2021

b) Date of first release of national data: T+10 (provisional data)

c) Lag (days): 0

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31/10/2021

b) Date of first release of national data: T+10 (provisional data)

c) Lag (days): 0

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  18
Delay (days)  0  0
Reasoning for delay  -


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

No particular issues

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  No  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39.  No  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat’s EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).    Any 2 part timers are equivalent to 1 full timer
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25  No  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  No  
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59.  No  Asked for which sector they do research
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  Enteprises requesting Government assistance and possibility known to be R&D active are specifically targeted
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No  
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  All variables are collectd on annual basis
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  All variables are collected on annual basis
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities  No deviation  
Data collection method  No deviation  
Cooperation with respondents  No deviation  
Follow-up of non-respondents  No deviation  
Data processing methods  No deviation  
Treatment of non-response  No deviation  Non-response are estimated based on CIS data and previous year data
Data weighting  -  No weighting
Variance estimation  -  N/A
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  No deviation  
Survey type  No deviation  Census for R&D active enterprises
Sample design  No deviation  Not a sample
Survey questionnaire  No deviation  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)    2010 Coverage increased to include all NACEs and size classes
  Function    2005 For the period 2002-2005 Malta holds a derogation for most R&D variables, in accordance with section 2 of the annex of the Commission Regulation No 1450/2004
  Qualification    2005 For the period 2002-2005 Malta holds a derogation for most R&D variables, in accordance with section 2 of the annex of the Commission Regulation No 1450/2004
R&D personnel (FTE)      
  Function    2005 For the period 2002-2005 Malta holds a derogation for most R&D variables, in accordance with section 2 of the annex of the Commission Regulation No 1450/2004
  Qualification    2005 For the period 2002-2005 Malta holds a derogation for most R&D variables, in accordance with section 2 of the annex of the Commission Regulation No 1450/2004
R&D expenditure    2010 Coverage increased to include all NACEs and size classes
Source of funds    2005 Not available pre 2005
Type of costs    2005 Not available pre 2005
Type of R&D    2005 For the period 2002-2005 Malta holds a derogation for most R&D variables, in accordance with section 2 of the annex of the Commission Regulation No 1450/2004
Other    2005, 2004, 2003 Data source previous for R&D personnel (HC) and total R&D expenditure 2003 was the SBS, 2004 CIS and 2005 onwards R&D survey

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Data is produced the same for odd and even years

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.  Intramural R & D expenditure (code 230101 in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197) and R & D personnel (code 230201) are surveyed also in foreign-controlled EU enterprises statistics (inward FATS).

The Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12) (europa.eu) also collects the R&D expenditure of enterprises that form the coverage of the CIS2020 survey. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

The main data sources for the national accounts’ R&D estimate are the R&D expenditure presented in the Frascati tables. The data are compiled in line with the Frascati Manual by the Business Register, Research and Innovation Unit and Public Finance Unit. To ensure consistency between Frascati table and national accounts concepts, the tables that have been recommended by Eurostat were used. 

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
 R&D expenditure  Euro    CIS  nil  The difference is nil when the data is being compared with CIS 2018 vs R&D 2018 and for the size classes and NACE coverage available in both domains
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS

R&D population is based on known active R&D enterprises while inward FATS population covers all enterprises with foreign control.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  59943.747  1181  487
Final data (delivered T+18)  64222.322  1203  530.5
Difference (of final data)  4278.575  22  43.5
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  Euro 31,027 p.a.
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2) extramural remuneration not collected

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  Not seperately available  0
Data collection costs  Not seperately available  0
Other costs  Not seperately available  0
Total costs  Not seperately available  0
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  N/A  N/A
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  N/A  Not possible to estimate - respondents were not asked for the time taken to fill in the questionnaire
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  N/A  N/A
Total cost  N/A  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  Research and Development Survey 2021
Type of survey  A census of all known R&D active enterprises
Combination of sample survey and census data  No
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  No
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  Census only
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  Census only
Variables the survey contributes to all variables in the Eurostat/OECD common core questionnaire are collected from this survey
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  survey launch June22 and finalised by May23
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  The enterprise    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)  Not applicable    
Stratification variable classes  Not applicable    
Population size  369    
Planned sample size  Not applicable    
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)  Not applicable    
Survey frame  Identification of R&D performance thriugh CIS and administrative sources (MCST, IRD and Malta Enterprise)    
Sample design  Census only    
Sample size  Census only    
Survey frame quality  Not applicable    
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  No administrative data is used
Description of collected data / statistics  Not applicable
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  Not applicable
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum)  369 (population)
Mode of data collection  Survey was sent via email. If no email was available, survey was sent by post.
Incentives used for increasing response  We let them know that their data is vital for both local and international policy making decisions.
Follow-up of non-respondents  3 reminders (first 2 sent by email and final legal sent by post), emails and telephone calls.
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  Previous year data is left constant if not available from the financial statements.
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  72%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  N/A
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  R&D questionnaire 2021.doc
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  R&D questionnaire 2021 nace 72.doc
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  


Annexes:
R&D questionnaire 2021 with notes
R&D questionnaire 2021 for enterprises NACE 72
18.4. Data validation

Completed questionnaires received via email or by mail are vetted by BRRI Unit personnel. During vetting, the logic of the questionnaire is checked. The data entry application includes in-built validations which also cater for the logic of the questionnaire. A second round of vetting is done more attentively during the reporting through the year to year checks and data from the Innovation Survey. At this stage data is also compared with previous years for consistency and should any queries arise, the enterprise is contacted by telephone.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more  employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  40.41 19.12  22.39  20  28.18 
R&D personnel (FTE)  40.41 19.12 22.39 20 28.18
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  22.55  30.34  28.18
R&D personnel (FTE)  22.55  30.34  28.18

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  Annual survey is carried out
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Data for those who did not reply within the 10 months is kept constant
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  NUTS 0, 1 and 2 are equal to the national level so no derivation.
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items For the MT"s GOV and HE sectors, we use an established ratio of 1FT = 3 PT, to calculate the FTE. For the BES sector 2PT are taken as 1FT
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  Depreciation and VAT are excluded from R&D expenditure.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  No known differences.
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method Not applicable
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description) Active R&D enterprises from previous rounds, the Community Innovation Survey (CIS), as it addresses a particular question to R&D; and other administrative sources for which enterprises apply to benefit from funds or tax rebates related to R&D.
Variables used for weighting Not applicable
Calibration method and the software used Not applicable
Estimation If a unit engaged in R&D fails to report its data, we pursue it until the data is sent to us. In some instances, if a unit did not send us its data, we keep the data constant for the respective year.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top