Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Enterprise Structural and Financial Statistic Section

1.5. Contact mail address

Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia

Lāčplēša street 1, Rīga, LV  1010

Latvia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 21/03/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 21/03/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 21/03/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The “enterprise” is defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing enterprises classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Rev.2).

 

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics. (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

 

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing  Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 No additional classification used  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  No difference from Frascati Manual
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  No difference from Frascati Manual
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  No difference from Frascati Manual
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector  No difference from Frascati Manual
Hospitals and clinics  Hospitals and clinics can be included in HES or in GOV sector, it depends on administration
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to BES  Not included
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  No difference from Frascati Manual
External R&D personnel  No difference from Frascati Manual
Clinical trials  No difference from Frascati Manual
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  Available
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  Available
Intramural R&D expenditure in foreign-controlled enterprises – coverage   Not covered
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit enterprise) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  Extramural expenditure are collected for all sectors with special tables in questionnaires
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  No difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar
Source of funds  Business enterprises, direct government, funds from abroad
Type of R&D  Basic research, applied research, experimental development
Type of costs  Intramural R&D expenditure: current costs, R&D capital investments; extramural R&D expenditure
Economic activity of the unit  Main economic activity of the institution conducting the R&D activity
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72)  Not collected
Product field  Not collected
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  Not applicable.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  Total number of persons employed during the calendar year
Function  Researchers, technicians and supporting staff are included
Qualification  Holders of ISCED 8, ISCED 7, ISCED 6, ISCED 5 are included
Age  Only internal researchers
Citizenship  Only internal researchers
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Calendar
Function  Researchers, technicians and supporting staff are included
Qualification  Holders of ISCED 8, ISCED 7, ISCED 6, ISCED 5 are included
Age  Not collected
Citizenship  Not collected
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

Post-graduate students are not included

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 No    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for BERD is the enterprise as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993– if there are deviations please explain.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some enterprises for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  Statistical Business Register used to defined target population. The target population is defined as active enterprises during year 2021 whose main economical activity is from A to U  
Estimation of the target population size  96667  
Size cut-off point  No  
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services)  0-9, 10-49, 50-249, 250+  
NACE/ISIC classes covered  All  
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population  Frame population includes all enterprises corresponding to the target population and is defined as active enterprises during year 2021 whose main economical activity is from A to U. Not included units with any sign of liquidation. NACE2.red.9603 is not included.  If any information is available about R&D conducted, these enterprises are included in the frame.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer  Enterprises with more than 100 employees; NACE code “72”; also answers for the certain questions of 2020 year questionnaire were taken to define supposed R&D performer, as well as information from administrative data sources
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  Not applicable
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  Not applicable
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  Not included units with any sign of liquidation. NACE2.red.9603 is not included.
Estimation of the frame population   96667

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

Latvia

3.8. Coverage - Time

See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable


4. Unit of measure Top

R&D indicators are available according to 5 units of measure:

 

PN: Number for number of enterprises and number of persons employed.

PS: Number of R&D personnel (both internal and external R&D personnel) in headcounts.

FT: Number of R&D personnel (both internal and external R&D personnel) activities in full-time equivalent.

XDC: Thousands of nacional currency. All financial variables are provided in thousands of euros.

PT: Percent 


5. Reference Period Top

2021


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. Regulation No 2020/1197 sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  Mandatory
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  By general
Legal acts Statistics Law

Cabinet regulation Nr. 782 "Official Statistics Programme for 2022–2024" (only in Latvian)

Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Planned changes of legislation  Not applicable


Annexes:
Cabinet regulation Nr. 782 "Official Statistics Programme for 2022–2024" (only in Latvian)
Statistics law
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

  • Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European statistics 
  • Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council
  • Statistics Law.

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

  • Code of Ethics 
  • Privacy Statement
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Statistical data shall be considered confidential if they directly or indirectly allow for identification of the private individuals or State authorities regarding which personal statistical data have been provided (primary and secondary confidentiality are applied). 

All table cells whose values are derived from less than respondents are treated as confidentialIn order to ensure confidentialitythe dominance criteria shall also be useded.

In order to ensure that summary information is protectedadditional (so-called secondarycell values are defaultedthereby protecting primary confidential cells.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The release policy and release calendar exists and they are publicly accessible. All official statistics are published according to the data release calendar, at 13.00.

8.2. Release calendar access

Release calendar is available.



Annexes:
Release calendar
8.3. Release policy - user access

Users are informed that the data is being released by release calendar. Before the official time of publication, some officials are granted access to statistical data to ensure them time needed for data analysis, understanding and preparation of the point of view. Before provision of such information, the CSB assesses the need and benefits to the society, as well as concludes an agreement on compliance with data confidentiality. Information on the privileged access to statistical data is published on the CSB website.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

R&D statistics is conducted and disseminated every year.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  N  
Ad-hoc releases  N  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y

Core data are available in “Statistical Yearbook of Latvia”;

Latvia. Statistics in Brief.

Online database is available.

Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 



Annexes:
R&D statistics
Statistical Yearbook of Latvia 2022
10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Core data are available in the online database 



Annexes:
Statistics database
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not available

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

It is possible to use remote access to anonymized individual data in research. Depending on the additional data processing methods applied, the datasets are available for use on the researcher's infrastructure (OffSite) or on the remote access system of the Central Statistical Bureau (OnSite). The data are available if application is filled in and contract is concluded in case of positive decision from the Central Statistical Bureau. Anonymized individual data can be only used for scientific or research purposes, moreover, research result has to assure benefit to all society.

Individual data or microdata are records from surveys, population censuses or registers on individuals, households or enterprises.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Not limited
Access cost policy  Free website, publications for pay
Micro-data anonymisation rules  Microdata are available under some conditions


Annexes:
Research data catalogue
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not available

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y    
Other  N    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Reference metadata SIMS 2.0 standart available in online database.



Annexes:
Reference metadata SIMS 2.0
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not available.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)  Definitions and explanations in online survey are available.

In on-line database core data and methodology are available. In “Statistical Yearbook of Latvia” tables and graphs are available.

Request on further clarification, most problematic issues

No

Measures to increase clarity  No
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   No complains from the data users side.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

CSB has introduced Quality Management System (QMS). The system is directed towards providing high user satisfaction and ensuring compliance with regulatory enactments. Based on the structure of Generic Statistical Business Process Model (GSBPM), QMS defines and at the level of procedures describes processes of statistical production as well as sets the persons responsible for the monitoring of processes at all stages of the statistical production. QMS defines the sequence how processes are implemented (i.e., activities to be performed (incl. verifications of processes and statistics, sequence and implementation requirements thereof, as well as persons responsible for the implementation)), procedures used in the evaluation of processes and statistics, as well as any improvements needed.
Since 2018, QMS of the CSB has been certified by the standard ISO 9001:2015 “Quality Management Systems. Requirements” (certified scope: Production of official statistics – planning, development, data acquisition, processing, analysis and dissemination).

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Quality of statistics is assessed in accordance with the existing requirements of external and internal regulatory enactments and in accordance with the established quality criteria.

Regulation (EC) no 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European statistics states that European Statistics European statistics shall be developed, produced and disseminated on the basis of uniform standards and of harmonised methods. In this respect, the following quality criteria shall apply: relevance, accuracy, timeliness, punctuality, accessibility, clarity, comparability and coherence.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
1 - European level The European Commission Data according to Commission Regulation 2020/1197
1 - National

The Ministry of Economics, the Ministry of Education and Science

Summary tables - to work out R&D strategy and politics
1 - International organisations OECD Data according to Commission Regulation 2020/1197
4 - Researchers and students Researchers and students Summary tables - to analyse the field of R&D
     

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No user satisfaction survey has been conducted.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  No user satisfaction survey has been conducted.
Short description of the feedback received  No user satisfaction survey has been conducted.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  5          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure    4        
Optional data on R&D expenditure    4        
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  5          
Optional data on R&D personnel    4        
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  5          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds Y - 2002 Annual        
Type of R&D Y - 2002 Annual        
Type of costs Y - 2002 Annual        
Socioeconomic objective Y - 2016 Annual        
Region Latvia in NUTS 2 Annual        
FORD Y - 2002 Annual        
Type of institution Y - 2021 Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex Y - 2002 Annual        
Function Y - 2002  Annual        
Qualification Y - 2002  Annual        
Age Y - 2012 (only researchers) Annual    Starting from year 2016 only about internal researchers    
Citizenship Y - 2016 (only internal researchers) Annual        
Region  Latvia in NUTS2 Annual        
FORD Y - 2002 Annual        
Type of institution N  Not available        
Economic activity Y - 2002 Annual        
Product field N  Not available        
Employment size class Y - 2002 Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex Y - 2002  Annual        
Function Y - 2002 Annual        
Qualification Y - 2002 Annual        
Age  N  Not available        
Citizenship  N   Not available        
Region  Latvia in NUTS 2 Annual        
FORD Y - 2002 Annual        
Type of institution  N   Not available        
Economic activity Y - 2002 Annual        
Product field  N   Not available        
Employment size class Y - 2002 Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 No additional dimension or variable available at national level          
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'

 

  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure See point 13.2.1.1.  -  -  -  -  -  No error known.
Total R&D personnel in FTE See point 13.2.1.1.  -  -  -  -  -  No error known.
Researchers in FTE See point 13.2.1.1.  -  -  -  -  -  No error known.

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure  5        
Total R&D personnel in FTE  5        
Researchers in FTE  5        

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Since the year 2021 the coefficient of variation is no longer calculated. Threshold sampling and no changes in strata.

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE

 

  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  -  -
  See point 13.2.1.1.
R&D personnel (FTE)

 -

 -
 See point 13.2.1.1.

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class

 

  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250- and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  -  -   -   -  See point 13.2.1.1.
R&D personnel (FTE)  -
 -  -  -  See point 13.2.1.1.
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errorsNot available

 

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect: Not available

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)  Not available  -  -
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)  Not available  -  -
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

No administrative data

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

 Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)  -  -  -  -  Frame misclassification rate is not calculated as there are no changes in strata.
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  -  -  -  -  Frame misclassification rate is not calculated as there are no changes in strata.
Misclassification rate  -  -  -  -  Frame misclassification rate is not calculated as there are no changes in strata.
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)  -  -  -  -  Frame misclassification rate is not calculated as there are no changes in strata.
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  -  -  -  -  Frame misclassification rate is not calculated as there are no changes in strata.
Misclassification rate  -  -  -  -  Frame misclassification rate is not calculated as there are no changes in strata.
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors Not applicable

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:  Not applicable

 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
 

0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional)

10-49 employees and self-employed persons

50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  494  635  931  241  2301
Total number of units in the sample  570  647  955  243  2415
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  0.133

0.019

0.025 

 0.008

0.047

Unit Non-response rate (weighted)  0.133  0.019  0.025  0.008  0.047
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE
  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  930  1371  2301
Total number of units in the sample  966  1449 2415 
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  0.037  0.054  0.047
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)  0.037  0.054  0.047

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Reminders are sent twice and it is called several times to remind that the questionnaire should be submitted.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  No
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  No
Data collection method employed  No
Response rate of this type of survey  Not applicable
The main reasons of non-response identified  Not applicable
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)  0  0  0
Imputation (Y/N)  N  N  N
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used  -  -
-
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  No magnitude of errors (%) calculated.
Total R&D personnel in FTE  
Researchers in FTE  

 

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  Respondents responds through electronic online questionnaires (CAWI). The programme for data input does not allow inputting erroneous for it has logical and mathematical data controls.
Estimates of data entry errors  
Variables for which coding was performed  
Estimates of coding errors  
Editing process and method  
Procedure used to correct errors  
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: At national level data published in 31.08.2020 (as preliminary); preliminary data sent to Eurostat in 12.10.2022.

c) Lag (days): 0

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: Data sent to Eurostat in 30.06.2023. The corrections of the data at national level has been done at the same time.

c) Lag (days): 0

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  18
Delay (days)   0  0
Reasoning for delay  No delay  No delay


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

EU data on EU-27 as a whole and for each EU Member State are published on Eurostat website. 

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not available

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

No differences from Frascati Manual.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  No  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39.  No  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat’s EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25  No  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  No  
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59.  No  
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  Not applicable  
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  No  
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No  
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   No  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities  No  
Data collection method  No  
Cooperation with respondents  No  
Follow-up of non-respondents  No  
Data processing methods  No  
Treatment of non-response  No  
Data weighting  No  
Variance estimation  No  
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  No  
Survey type  No  
Sample design  No  
Survey questionnaire  No  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

 The data can be compared since 1993.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)    No  
  Function    No  
  Qualification    No  
R&D personnel (FTE)    No  
  Function    No  
  Qualification    No  
R&D expenditure    No  
Source of funds    No  
Type of costs    No  
Type of R&D    No  
Other    No  

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

The data are produced in the same way in the odd and even years.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.  Intramural R & D expenditure (code 230101 in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197) and R & D personnel (code 230201) are surveyed also in foreign-controlled EU enterprises statistics (inward FATS).

The Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12) (europa.eu) also collects the R&D expenditure of enterprises that form the coverage of the CIS2020 survey. 

If an enterprise has reported R&D expenditures, these data for the reference year (2020) are preprinted in the the Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020). Differences arise when an enterprise does not become a sample unit (or doesn't show the R&D) expenditures) of one or another survey (R&D survey or Community innovation survey).

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not available

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not available

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
Intramural R&D expenditure          In even years we compare with CIS data, in uneven years no other sources exist.
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS

Not available

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  76151.379  1834  1155
Final data (delivered T+18)  92786.795  1846  1166
Difference (of final data)  +16635.416  +12  +11
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  Not available
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  Not available

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

In line with the strategic directions of the European Statistics System and latest trends in statistical production, continuous use of information acquired in regular CSB surveys and proportionate reduction of the response burden are among the key CSB priorities.

In cooperation with holders of administrative data and in line with the competences provided for in the Statistics Law, CSB is striving to solve the issues related to the use of administrative data sources, thus aiming to acquire as comprehensive and high-quality administrative data allowing to reduce response burden on enterprises and households as possible.

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  Confidential   No work sub-contracted to third parties.
Data collection costs  Confidential   No work sub-contracted to third parties.
Other costs  Confidential   No work sub-contracted to third parties.
Total costs  Confidential   No work sub-contracted to third parties.
Comments on costs
 -

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  2301  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  1.5 h  
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  Not available  
Total cost  Not available  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Revision Policy is an important component of good governance practice addressed more and more often in the international statistical society. The objective of the Revision Policy is to lay down the order of review or revision of the prepared and published data. The first chapter of the present document explains the terms applied in the Revision Policy, the second chapter shortly characterises the CSB Revision Policy, whereas the third chapter stipulates the revision cycle of the statistical data produced by the CSB.



Annexes:
REVISON POLICY GUIDELINES
17.2. Data revision - practice

Published data are not revised.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  R&D activities in the business sector
Type of survey  Threshold survey
Combination of sample survey and census data  Not applicable
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  Not applicable
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  Not applicable
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  Not applicable
Variables the survey contributes to  The number of R&D personnel (PS) by categories of R&D personnel, by gender, by level of formal qualification in the end of year. The number of R&D personnel (FT) by categories of R&D personnel during calender year. Intramural expenditure on R&D by type of costs by type of R&D. The extramural expenditure on R&D by type of receiver. Sources of funds for intramural and extramural R&D.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  2016
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  Enterprise    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)  Full sample- economic activity, enterprise size-class by number of employees    
Stratification variable classes  2 digit NACE, size-class    
Population size  96667    
Planned sample size  ~3000    
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)  Threshold sampling    
Survey frame   Statistical Business Register mainly, as well as other data sources on enterprises received funding for R&D, enterprises with R&D personnel etc.    
Sample design The biggest part of enterprises were stratified using three indicators: number of employees (4 size classes); NACE group (80 groups);  “big” units with 100% sample. Hovewer, the largest enterprises were stratified separately (in each strata - 1 enterprise).  The number of strata is 342(49 of them were large enterprises).    
Sample size  2415    
Survey frame quality  Good    
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  Ministry of Economics Republic of Latvia, Investment and Development Agency of Latvia, Central Finance and Contracting Agency Republic of Latvia, Register of a Scientific Institutions etc.
Description of collected data / statistics  Information only
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  Not applicable
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum)  2415
Mode of data collection  Online survey, telephone interview, questionnaire sent by e-mail
Incentives used for increasing response  None
Follow-up of non-respondents  Email reminders, repeated phone reminders
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  None
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  95.28 %
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  Not applicable
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  No
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:

 
Questionnaire: Pārskats par pētniecības un attīstības darbu izpildi uzņēmējdarbības sektorā 2021. gadā

Explanatory notes: Informatīvais materiāls veidlapas aizpildīšanai

Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  No
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  No


Annexes:
Questionnaire (LV)
Explanatory notes (LV)
18.4. Data validation

Collected data has been compared with previous years.

Respondents who have given a negative response are beeing checked after the managment report and annual report.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

 

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class

 

No imputated data.

 

  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more  employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure          
R&D personnel (FTE)          
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE

 

No imputated data.

 

  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  
   
R&D personnel (FTE)  
   

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  The survey is conducted annually.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Institutions submit questionnaires to the CSB until T+3.5, and then they are processed. Preliminary data are ready T+9.
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  Latvia is NUTS2
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  Not applicable
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  Not applicable
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  No differences from Frascati Manual
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method  The inverse of the sampling fraction was used as weights. In the realized sample   weights = Nh /mh where Nh is the total number of enterprises in the stratum h of the population and mh is the number of enterprises in the realised sample in the stratum h, assuming that each unit in the stratum had the same inclusion probability. This will automatically adjust the sample weights of the respondents to compensate for unit non-response.
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description)  Data source is the statistical Business Register.
Variables used for weighting  Nh is the total number of enterprises in the stratum h of the population and mh is the number of enterprises in the realised sample in the stratum h.
Calibration method and the software used  Not applicable
Estimation  Horwitz-Thompson estimation
18.6. Adjustment

Not applicable

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top