Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Finland


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Finland

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Economic Statistics

1.5. Contact mail address

FIN-00022 Statistics Finland


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 31/10/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 31/10/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 31/10/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The “enterprise” is defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing enterprises classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Rev.2).

 

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics. (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

 

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing  Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
Not applicable.
 
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  According to the Frascati manual guidelines.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  All FORD covered, however breakdown is not requested.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  -
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector Enterprises with 10+ persons employed in all NACE classes are covered. Also, known R&D performers in the size-class 1-9 persons employed.
Hospitals and clinics Included if they belong to the BES. University hospitals are part of HES.
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to BES No
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  According to the Frascati manual guidelines.
External R&D personnel  Experimental estimate of the total FTEs.
Clinical trials  According to the Frascati manual guidelines.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  -
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  -
Intramural R&D expenditure in foreign-controlled enterprises – coverage   R&D performed in Finland by foreign-owned enterprises available.
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit enterprise) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure There is a question on the extramural R&D in all sectors. The main purpose of the question is to make sure that respondents do separate extramural and intramural expenditure. Detailed instructions are provided for the respondents. Published results cover R&D performers only.
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  Quality is assured by software checks and manual editing. In order to clarify the distinction there is in the intramural R&D expenditure a cost item: purchased services fully integrated in the unit's own R&D.
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar year, however enterprise can report equivalent most recent fiscal year.
Source of funds  No deviations from FM. Data on the funding sources requested by the Eurostat are produced. Breakdowns internal/external and exchange/transfer funds are as such not directly collected but can be estimated.
Type of R&D  FM breakdown available.
Type of costs  Wages and salaries; other current costs with subgroups: other current costs, purchased services (services directly linked to own R&D); capital expenditure.
Economic activity of the unit  NACE-class of the responding enterprise defined by the business enterprise register
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72)   -
Product field  Available, equal to the Eurostat and OECD data collections (based on the NACE)
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  Defence units belonging to the BES are included in survey. However, defence R&D as such is not differentiated. 
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  End of calendar year.
Function  Data available by breakdown: researchers; other R&D personnel.
Qualification  Data available by breakdown: PhD’s or equivalent (ISCED 8); university degree, polytechnics or equivalent, master or bachelor level (ISCED 6-7); other education
Age  -
Citizenship  -
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Calendar year.
Function  Data available by breakdown: researchers; other.
Qualification  Data available by breakdown: PhD’s or equivalent (ISCED 8); university degree, polytechnics or equivalent, master or bachelor level (ISCED 6-7); other education.
Age  -
Citizenship  -
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

The survey questionnaire request from R&D performers the R&D person-years performed during calendar year of the survey by staff of the enterprise. A R&D person-year is defined as full-time R&D work for one person (including 4-6 weeks annual leave). Frascati recommendation at least 0,1 FTE is respected.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 -    
 -    
 -    
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for BERD is the enterprise as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993– if there are deviations please explain.

Statistical unit enterprise will be implemented as from 2022 according to the guidelines by Eurostat. However, claculations indicate that the impact will be minimal.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some enterprises for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population Known or supposed R&D performers.  
Estimation of the target population size R&D panel updated by a sample.  
Size cut-off point Known or supposed R&D performers, no cut-off point; census of enterprises with 100+ employees; sample of enterprises with 10-99 employees.  
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services) Known or supposed R&D performers, no cut-off point; census of enterprises with 100+ employees; sample of enterprises with 10-99 employees.  
NACE/ISIC classes covered  All NACE-classes covered  
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population  The frame is the business register of Statistics Finland. It covers all the active enterprises. A panel of known or supposed R&D performers is constructed from this frame.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer  1) Enterprise has reported R&D in the previous R&D survey by Statistics Finland; 2) Enterprise has received public R&D funding. Authorised by Statistics Act Statistics Finland can request a complete listing of the enterprises with public R&D funding from the funding organisations.
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  The R&D panel is annually updated by a sample which is drawn from the rest of the frame after the panel has been formed.
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  There were 566 enterprises with no R&D t-1 but R&D in t=2021
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  Units with less than 10 persons employed included only if they are known R&D performers (reported R&D t-1 or public R&D grant).
Estimation of the frame population  

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

HC: number of persons; FTE: person-years; expenditure, source of funds: 1 000 euros


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. Regulation No 2020/1197 sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  Statistics stipulated by the EU regulations are considered as mandatory to produce by Statitics Finland.
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  The production of national R&D statistics governed by the general national statistical legislation.
Legal acts  Statistics Act (280/2004).
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  As for the confidential data access by protocols of researcher's service unit of Statistics Finland.
Planned changes of legislation  -
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 Unit level data on persons, households and enterprises are confidential. However, data on the government sector organisations are in principle not confidential.

 

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 As specified in the Statistics Act and it's implementation in Statistics Finland.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Number of respondents, dominance.

Basic confidentiality rule for a NACE class for example is at least three units reporting R&D activity.

As for the dominance, there is no exact threshold.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Publicly available release calendar.

8.2. Release calendar access

Open access on the website of Statistics Finland: https://stat.fi/en/future-releases

8.3. Release policy - user access

Open access to publication and databases on the website of Statistics Finland. Release information for users by standard protocols of Statistics Finland.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y  https://stat.fi/en/statistics/tkke
Ad-hoc releases  Y  https://stat.fi/en/statistics/tkke

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

General publication online.  https://stat.fi/en/statistics/tkke
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

https://pxdata.stat.fi/PxWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__tkke/

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Research services unit of Statistics Finland.
Access cost policy  According to protocols of the Research services unit.
Micro-data anonymisation rules  According to protocols of the Research services unit.
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website Y  Aggregate figures  
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests Y  Aggregate figures, subject to fee  
Other  -    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

https://stat.fi/en/statistics/documentation/tkke

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)  Quality descriptions, classifications, concepts and definitions, statistical processing: https://stat.fi/en/statistics/tkke#documentation
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues Occasional discussions with stakeholders on different topics.
Measures to increase clarity According to the overall policy of Statistics Finland.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  Feedback not collected, but clarifications are provided when requested.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Quality management requires comprehensive guidance of activities. The principles of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM principles) are employed by Statistics Finland as its overall framework for quality management. The quality management framework of the field of statistics is the European Statistics Code of Practice (CoP). The frameworks complement each other. The quality criteria of Official Statistics of Finland are also compatible with the European Statistics Code of Practice.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Some of the activities undertaken in order to assure a high quality of business R&D statistics:

- use of registers of the enterprises which have received public R&D support
- two reminding letters to the non-respondents, personal contacts to the large R&D performers
- training of the personnel responsible for data editing
- external audits of the R&D statistics according to the practices of Statistics Finland's quality management

 


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1-European level The European Commission
(Eurostat, other DGs etc.)
Data used for the compilation of the European statistics and policy analysis.
 1-National level Finland, the national level Ministries (Employment and the Economy; Education and Culture), Research and Innovation Council; Business Finland (the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation), Academy of Finland, etc. Statistics used for the follow up of the development and for policy purposes
 1-International organisations OECD, UN etc, Research institutes and statistical agencies in other countries Data and statistics used for
international comparisons
 2- Social actors Employers’ associations, Trade unions etc. Statistics used for the follow up of the development and for their specific issues
 3- Media Magazines and newspapers, social media Statistics used for the information on the overall development of R&D activity and as a basic
material for specific articles
 4- Researchersand students Researchers and research
institutes, students
Need for the statistics and analyses, need for the access to the data
5- Enterprises or businesses Enterprises providing consultancy services Consultancy services and analysis on the development of R&D

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction Statistics Finland monitors user satisfaction.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics Satisfaction surveys in the field of R&D statistics are not conducted but instead there are meetings and other frequent contacts with the national key STI policy experts and researchers to gather feedback.
Short description of the feedback received Occasional requests for more detailed breakdowns (for example by NACE, regional breakdowns).
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available.

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  X          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  X          
Optional data on R&D expenditure    X        
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  X          
Optional data on R&D personnel    X        
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  X          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y-1971 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
Type of R&D  Y-2011 Annual        
Type of costs  Y-1971  Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
Socioeconomic objective  N          
Region  Y-1973  Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
FORD  Y-1971, end 1983  Biennial, until 1983        
Type of institution  Y-2021  Annual data        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1987 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
Function  Y-2004 Annual data         
Qualification  Y-1971 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data         
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  Y-1995 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
FORD  Y-1971, end 1983  Biennial, until 1983        
Type of institution  N          
Economic activity  Y-1971 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data         
Product field  N          
Employment size class  Y-1971 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  N          
Function  Y-2004 Annual data        
Qualification  Y-1971 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  Y -1995 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
FORD  Y-1971,  end 1983 Biennial until 1983         
Type of institution  N          
Economic activity  Y-1971 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        
Product field  N          
Employment size class  Y-1971 Until 1997 biennial, as from 1997 annual data        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
Not applicable.          
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure Not applicable   Not applicable Not known but possible Very small Very small    +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE Not applicable  Not applicable Not known but possible Very small  Very small    +/-
Researchers in FTE Not applicable  Not applicable Not known but possible Very small Very small    +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure    X      
Total R&D personnel in FTE    X      
Researchers in FTE    X      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Not applicable

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
R&D personnel (FTE)  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250- and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
R&D personnel (FTE)  Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable 
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 As the method is a panel of R&D performing firms based on the high quality official business register this is very minor issue.

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)  Not relevant    
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)  Not relevant    
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)         Not relevant.
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)         Not relevant.
Misclassification rate         Not relevant.
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)         Not relevant. 
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)         Not relevant.
Misclassification rate         Not relevant.
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

Not known, assumed to be small.  

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Detailed instructions accompany the survey questionnaire, respondent support by phone and email. The online questionnaire assists the respondent by alerting logical inconsistencies, missing items etc. Responses of the most important R&D performers inspected in detail.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
 

0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional)

10-49 employees and self-employed persons

50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  798  1843  1406  521  4568
Total number of units in the sample  1211  2873  2068  705  6857
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  34,1%  35,9%  32,0%  26,1  33,4%
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)          
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE
  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  1730  2838  4568
Total number of units in the sample  2540  4317  6857
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  31,9%  34,3%  33,4%
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)      

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Two reminders (letters). Largest missing units contacted also by e-mail or phone.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  No
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  
Data collection method employed  
Response rate of this type of survey  
The main reasons of non-response identified  Response burden
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)  1.4% 5,6%  11,4%
Imputation (Y/N)  Y Y Y
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used  a) Response t-1; b) estimated price of the FTE; c) average distribution of the NACE class (ratio imputation).   a) Response t-1; b) estimated price of the FTE; c) average distribution of the NACE class (ratio imputation).

  a) Response t-1; b) estimated price of the FTE; c) average distribution of the NACE class (ratio imputation).

At least 0,1 researcher FTE is required.

13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  Assumed very small (the R&D panel captures the most important R&D performers)
Total R&D personnel in FTE  Assumed very small (the R&D panel captures the most important R&D performers)
Researchers in FTE  Assumed very small (the R&D panel captures the most important R&D performers)
13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied Electronic online questionnaire.
Estimates of data entry errors Not applicable. Respondents fill the online questionnaire, which guides the respondents. No data entry by manual Statistics Finland.
Variables for which coding was performed Online questionnaire, no coding: for example, respondent selects regions in which R&D is performed from the list provided.
Estimates of coding errors Not applicable.
Editing process and method Automatic and manual editing based on the lists of errors due to logical checks and missing values. Largest R&D performers handled like case-studies.  
Procedure used to correct errors Logical relations, imputation based on the ratios and distributions, re-contacts. 
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 27.10.2022

c) Lag (days): 300

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 27.10.2022

c) Lag (days):
300

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) Not applicable, only final data transmitted. 10 (variables of the October data collection), before T+18 (full data)
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)    10/18
Delay (days)     -
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

No deviations from the Frascati manual or other international guidelines.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2). No  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39. No  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat’s EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25 Internal R&D personnel only Pilot data on the total external personel FTEs by the main sectors available. Respondents are not able to provide more detailed data.
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2). No  
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59. No  
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). Legal unit corresponding statistical unit enterprise. Few legal units of complex enterprises and some group level units to facilitate reporting. As from 2022 BES: statistical unit enterprise will be fully implemented, some group level responses still accepted due to pratical data collection reasons.
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No  
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No   
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18 No   
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No   
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No   
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities No  
Data collection method No  
Cooperation with respondents No   
Follow-up of non-respondents No   
Data processing methods No   
Treatment of non-response No  
Data weighting No  
Variance estimation No   
Data compilation of final and preliminary data No  
Survey type No  
Sample design No   
Survey questionnaire No  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)  National R&D statistics published as from 1971  2008,
1995, 1985, 1983
2008: implementation of Nace Rev.2, some regrouping of industries but no impact on the total figures. 1995: implementation of the Nace-classification, some regrouping of industries. Classification changes have had no impact on the total figures.
Until 1983, R&D activities of the enterprises were broken down by product field, based on the national ISIC-related industrial classification; from 1985 R&D activities are allocated to the principal economic activity of the enterprises according to the national ISIC-related industrial classification.
  Function    2004 Data available 2004 onwards by breakdown: researches; other
  Qualification    2015, 2004, 1987 Minor updates of the breakdown of R&D personnel by formal qualification. No important impact on the indicators by ISCED-classification.
R&D personnel (FTE)  National R&D statistics published as from 1971  2008,
1995, 1985, 1983
2008: implementation of Nace Rev.2, some regrouping of industries but no impact on the total figures. 1995: implementation of the Nace-classification, some regrouping of industries. Classification changes have had no impact on the total figures.
Until 1983, R&D activities of the enterprises were broken down by product field, based on the national ISIC-related industrial classification; from 1985 R&D activities are allocated to the principal economic activity of the enterprises according to the national ISIC-related industrial classification.
  Function    2004 Data available 2004 onwards by breakdown: researches; other
  Qualification    2015, 2004, 1987 Minor updates of the breakdown of R&D personnel by formal qualification. No important impact on the indicators by ISCED-classification.
R&D expenditure  National R&D statistics published as from 1971   2008,
1995, 1985, 1983
2008: implementation of Nace Rev.2, some regrouping of industries but no impact on the total figures. 1995: implementation of the Nace-classification, some regrouping of industries. Classification changes have had no impact on the total figures.
Until 1983, R&D activities of the enterprises were broken down by product field, based on the national ISIC-related industrial classification; from 1985 R&D activities are allocated to the principal economic activity of the enterprises according to the national ISIC-related industrial classification
Source of funds    2005, 1998 As from 2005 for the source of funds from abroad category Foreign enterprises within the same group / Other foreign enterprises was re-introduced (breakdown was not used 1999-2004)
Type of costs    2004 2004: distribution of acquired services, other current costs and investments not comparable to other years, wages and total BERD comparable.
Type of R&D    -  
Other    -  

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Full data produced annually.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.  Intramural R & D expenditure (code 230101 in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197) and R & D personnel (code 230201) are surveyed also in foreign-controlled EU enterprises statistics (inward FATS).

The Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12) (europa.eu) also collects the R&D expenditure of enterprises that form the coverage of the CIS2020 survey. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

According to the FM.  R&D data are used in the SNA.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
Intramural R&D expenditure (NACE C, year 2020, mill.EUR)  2736  2968  CIS 2020 survey, NACE C  232 CIS R&D data are checked on the micro-level by the R&D survey data and possible differences are treated when needed. Remaining differences mainly due to different survey desings, weights and different non-response.
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS

Difference in R&D figures between R&D statistics and iFATS statistics is due to different treatment of weights in the iFATS. Base data in the iFATS R&D is the same as in the R&D statistics. 

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  Preliminary data not produced.  Preliminary data not produced.  Preliminary data not produced.
Final data (delivered T+18)      
Difference (of final data)  Not applicable.  Not applicable.  Not applicable.
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  EUR 71 785
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  -

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs Not available. Not available. 
Data collection costs Not available. Not available.
Other costs Not available. Not available.
Total costs Not available. Not available.
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R) Not available.  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1 Not available.  
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C) Not available.  
Total cost Not available.  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name Business Enterprise Research and Development.
Type of survey Combination of census/panel and sample survey.
Combination of sample survey and census data Yes.
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling) There is a stratified random sampling for remaining enterprises with 10-99 employees.
    Sub-population B (covered by census) The survey is a census for enterprises with at least 100 employees, enterprises having R&D in the previous year or enterprises receiving government support for R&D.
Variables the survey contributes to Variables requested in the Eurostat data collection.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation Annual survey. The survey is launched in April; the collection phase is considered to be completed by August; results are available in October.
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit Enterprise    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only) Size-class, Nace    
Stratification variable classes Size-class: 0-9 (R&D panel only), 10-19, 20-49, 50-99 (panel+sample), 100+ (census).    
Population size Sampling frame 21491, R&D panel 3441    
Planned sample size 7038, panel 3441, sample 3577    
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only) SRS    
Survey frame Business enterpise register of Statistics Finland    
Sample design Panel + sample, in which allocation by SRS    
Sample size 7038, panel 3441, sample 3577    
Survey frame quality Complete register    
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source Not applicable 
Description of collected data / statistics Not applicable
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to Not applicable
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annual survey.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum) 6955 (83 units had closed down their activities since the last update of the register or were unable to answer)
Mode of data collection Online questionnaire. 
Incentives used for increasing response Reminding letters, other contacts to the respondents.
Follow-up of non-respondents The most important non-respondents contacted by email or phone.
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed) The most important non-respondents contacted by email or phone.
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility) 68,7%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods) Not applicable.
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English: FI_BERD_questionnaire_English
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language: FI_BERD_questionnaire_Finnish; FI_BERD_explanatory_notes_Finnish
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English: -
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language: -


Annexes:
FI_BERD_questionnaire_English
FI_BERD_questionnaire_Finnish
FI_BERD_explanatory_notes_Finnish
18.4. Data validation

1) comparison of the responses against the previous year, checking any inconsistencies with particular attention to the large R&D performers
2) checking the outliers in respect to overall distributions
3) micro editing based on the logical rules
4) macro level checks for any inconsistencies in the tabulations

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more  employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  4,4  6,0  6,6  5,1  5,7
R&D personnel (FTE)  6,6  8,8  9,7  10,0  8,7
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  4,7  6,3  5,7
R&D personnel (FTE)  8,7  8,7  8,7

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  Final data available at T+10, annual survey. Full data produced with same methodology every year.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Not applicable.
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data Direct question requesting breakdown of the main variables by municipality.
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items -
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures According to the FM.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  FM classifications respected.
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method The main component is R&D panel in which weighting is compensation for the non-response only. Sampling part contributes about 5% to the total and weights are partly expanded to the sampling frame (outlier weights are treated separately).
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description) The official business register of Statistics Finland.
Variables used for weighting Turnover.
Calibration method and the software used Not relevant.
Estimation Not relevant.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top