Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Estonia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Estonia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Economic and Environmental Statistics Department

1.5. Contact mail address

51 Tatari Str, 10134 Tallinn, Estonia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 02/04/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 02/04/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 02/04/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The “enterprise” is defined in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing enterprises classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Rev.2).

 

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics. (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

 

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing  Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 Not used  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  In consistent FM 2015
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  No
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  No
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector  Private and public enterprises only, no NPIs
Hospitals and clinics  Enterprise-type centres
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to BES  -
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  
In case of projects they are reported as whole, in case of R&D performing units
or individuals indirect supporting activities are not included
External R&D personnel On-site consultants are not included in intramural R&D
Clinical trials Included as recommended in FM
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability Available for all sectors 
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability Available
Intramural R&D expenditure in foreign-controlled enterprises – coverage  Not covered 
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit enterprise) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure The questionnaire has a corresponding question 
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure No 
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years Calendar year
Source of funds According to FM
Type of R&D According to FM 
Type of costs According to FM 
Economic activity of the unit Activity of the enterprise
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72) N/A 
Product field N/A 
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure N/A
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years End of calendar year 
Function No difficulties 
Qualification No difficulties 
Age No difficulties 
Citizenship Residents without citizenship are handled as Estonian citizens 
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years Calendar 
Function No difficulties 
Qualification Estimated from HC data by unit 
Age N/A 
Citizenship N/A 
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

Reporting unit does

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
Available in HC for all sectors yearly
 
 
   
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit for BERD is the enterprise as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993– if there are deviations please explain.

Enterprise

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing enterprises (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some enterprises for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population
Known and potential intramural
R&D performers
 
 -
Estimation of the target population size No  -
Size cut-off point No  -
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services)
0 and 1-9 size classes are considered as one. Data on subclasses
10-19, 20-49, 50-99, 100-249, 250-499, 500+ is available.
 
 -
NACE/ISIC classes covered All  -
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population
List of regular or irregular intramural R&D performers plus new-born
enterprises of certain activities (R&D, High-Tech, Biotech)
 
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer

List of regular or irregular intramural R&D performers is yearly updated with
the information from government financed foundations supporting R&D and
innovation related efforts of SMEs and from governmental agencies procuring
R&D activities from enterprises.

 
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  
To identify R&D performers not known yet among other firms the SBS
Frame is used. To include new-born enterprises of certain activities (R&D, HT,
Biotech) addition information about R&D activities is seeked from different
kinds of media and from enterprise Websites.
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population Not applicable 
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population No 
Estimation of the frame population Not applicable 

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

Not requested. R&D statistics cover national and regional data.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top
For personnel data the number of persons and FTE are dissaminated
Expenditure data are in euros


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. Regulation No 2020/1197 sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations Compulsory for part of data
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation The production of national R&D statistics is covered by the general national statistical legislation. 
Legal acts Official Statistics Act 
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts) Yes 
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts) Yes 
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Planned changes of legislation N/A 
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

The dissemination of data collected for the production of official statistics is based on the requirements laid down in §§ 34 and 35 of the Official Statistics Act.

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 Confidentiality agreements regarding the data we work with are standard for all employees. 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment
Manual, primary when number of respondents in stratum is less then 3, secondary (if needed) choosed by the
lowest number of respondents.
The data are published and transmitted without characteristics that permit identification of the respondents, and
classified into groups of at least three persons, whereas the share of data relating to each person in aggregate data
shall not exceed 90%.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar
Notifications about the dissemination of statistics are published in the release calendar, which is available on the
website. Every year on 1 October, the release times of the statistical database, news releases, main indicators by
IMF SDDS and publications for the following year are announced in the release calendar (in the case of publications –
the release month).
8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.stat.ee/en/calendar

 

8.3. Release policy - user access
All users have been granted equal access to official statistics: dissemination dates of official statistics are
announced in advance and no user category (incl. Eurostat, state authorities and mass media) is provided access to
official statistics before other users. Official statistics are first published in the statistical database. If there is also a news
release, it is published simultaneously with data in the statistical database. Official statistics are available on the
website at 8:00 a.m. on the date announced in the release calendar.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases N  -
Ad-hoc releases N  -

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 N  
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Provisional BES R&D statistics is released in the beginning of November finalised in the beginning of December

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Not limited
Access cost policy  Free Website
Micro-data anonymisation rules
The dissemination of data collected for the purpose of producing official statistics is guided by the requirements provided for in § 33, § 34, § 35, § 36, §
38 of the Official Statistics Act.
 
Access to microdata and anonymisation of microdata are regulated by Statistics Estonia’s procedure for dissemination of confidential data for scientific purposes:
 
 
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y    On request
Other  Y    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology
Frascati Manual. Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, OECD (2015)
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Statistics in online database is accompanied with adequate metadata
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  No need
Measures to increase clarity  No need
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   The users are satisfied with available metadata


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

To assure the quality of processes and products, Statistics Estonia applies the EFQM Excellence Model, the European Statistics Code of Practice and the Quality Assurance Framework of the European Statistical System (ESS QAF).
Statistics Estonia is also guided by the requirements in § 7. “Principles and quality criteria of producing official statistics” of the Official Statistics Act.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The BES R&D statistics methodology is in line with FM.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 
1-National level
President, Parliament, Ministries, political parties, governmental agencies and foundations, municipalities.  
Detailed data on capacity and trends of Estonian R&D performance for R&D and innovation and education policy decisions and strategy planning
3- Media   
Media for general public, specialised media for entrepreneurs and researches
 
Analysis of changes in Estonian R&D performance together with
international comparisons
4- Researchers and students  Researchers and students 
 
Statistics, analysis and access to microdata
 
2- Social actors  Estonian Employers’ Confederation Detailed data on capacity and trends of Estonian R&D performance for R&D and innovation 

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
 
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  
Since 1996 Statistics Estonia conducts reputation surveys and user surveys. The survey is conducted at least once a year, the existing as well as potential consumers are interviewed. The results of the surveys are applied to provide better services for consumers as well as in the improvement of 
products.
All results are available on the website http://www.stat.ee/usersurveys
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  No
Short description of the feedback received  
Certainly there exist interest for some additional information, but this can be a subject for other statistical instruments. General surveys confirm high level of
user's satisfaction.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate
All obligatory data for R&D personnel (HC, FTE) 100%
Data for R&D expenditures, all obligatory are 100%
12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  X          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  X          
Optional data on R&D expenditure  X          
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  X          
Optional data on R&D personnel  X          
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  -  -  -  -  -  
Estonia is NUTS2

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  1998  Yearly        
Type of R&D  1998  Yearly        
Type of costs  1998  Yearly        
Socioeconomic objective  

1998
(estimated)

 Yearly        
Region  

N/A,
Estonia is
NUTS2

         
FORD  N          
Type of institution  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex 1998   Yearly        
Function 1998  Yearly        
Qualification 1998   Yearly        
Age 2008   Yearly        
Citizenship          
Region
N/A, Estonia is NUTS2
         
FORD          
Type of institution          
Economic activity 1998  Yearly        
Product field 2000   Yearly        
Employment size class 1998   Yearly        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex 1998  Yearly         
Function 1998 Yearly         
Qualification  
1998
(estimated)
Yearly         
Age  
2008
(estimated)
Yearly         
Citizenship          
Region
N/A, Estonia is NUTS2
 
         
FORD          
Type of institution          
Economic activity 1998  Yearly         
Product field 2000 Yearly        
Employment size class 1998 Yearly        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 -          
 -          
 -          
 -          
 -          

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  

Not
applicable

           
Total R&D personnel in FTE Not
applicable
           
Researchers in FTE Not
applicable
           

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure  X        
Total R&D personnel in FTE    X      
Researchers in FTE    X      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Not applicable

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
R&D personnel (FTE)  
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250- and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey

 

Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
R&D personnel (FTE)  
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
 
Not calculated, as there is
census survey
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors: 

The accuracy of source data is monitored by assessing the methodological soundness of data sources and the adherence to the methodological recommendations.

The type of survey and the data collection methods ensure sufficient coverage and timeliness.

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Statistics Estonia try to reduce non-sampling errors through continuous methodological and survey process improvements.

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)  Not applicable  Not applicable  Not applicable
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame) 260  248 191  51  750
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  0  0  0  0  0
Misclassification rate  0  0  0  0  0
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame) 367  208  110  43  728
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  0  0  0  0  0
Misclassification rate  0  0  0  0  0
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

Data collection and processing software includes controls to eliminate errors and logical inconsistencies. All errors and logical inconsistencies are consulted with respondents and corrected.

  b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect: 

Arithmetic and qualitative controls are used in the validation process, including comparison with other data.
Before data dissemination the internal coherence of the data is checked.
13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
 

0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional)

10-49 employees and self-employed persons

50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample 564  416  282  94 1356
Total number of units in the sample 628  456  300  94 1478
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted) 10.19  8.77  6.0  0  8.25
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)  -  -  -  -  -
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE

 

  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample  691  665  1356
Total number of units in the sample  750  728  1478
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)  7.87  5.08  8.25
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)  -  -  -

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Numerous by phone and e-mail

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  No need for non-response survey.
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  No need for non-response survey.
Data collection method employed  No need for non-response survey.
Response rate of this type of survey  No need for non-response survey.
The main reasons of non-response identified  No need for non-response survey.
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)  0% 0%  
Imputation (Y/N)  N  N  N
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used  -  -  -
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  8.25
Total R&D personnel in FTE  8.25
Researchers in FTE  8.25
13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied
From online filling electronically, from printed out questionnaires the data is
entered by keying. Data entry errors are eliminated by means of controls in
processing software and by visual checking.
 
Estimates of data entry errors  
They are quite rare and the number of printed questionnaires are diminishing
every year.
Variables for which coding was performed  Coding is used for group of products linked to intramural R&D expenditure.
Estimates of coding errors  Errors are quite rare.
Editing process and method
The data is checked by means of arithmetical and logical controls used within
individual tables
and between tables. Different ratios are calculated to compare head-count and
FTE data, and expenditure and personnel data etc. In the case of major R&D
performers their data is compared against administrative or other available data.
The editing rate is around 10%.
 
Procedure used to correct errors Re-contact by phone or mail
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: T+12

b) Date of first release of national data: T+12

c) Lag (days): -

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: T+12

b) Date of first release of national data: T+12

c) Lag (days): -

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  18
Delay (days)   -  -
Reasoning for delay  -  -


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

The data are comparable with countries which collect data based on the common OECD methodology, which is also used by Eurostat.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2). No  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39. No   
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat’s EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25 No  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2). No   
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59. No   
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No  
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18 Yes   size-classes 0 and 1–9 are not separable
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No   
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No   
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities No  
Data collection method No   
Cooperation with respondents No   
Follow-up of non-respondents No   
Data processing methods No   
Treatment of non-response No   
Data weighting No   
Variance estimation No   
Data compilation of final and preliminary data No   
Survey type No  
Sample design No   
Survey questionnaire No   
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
  Function     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
  Qualification     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
R&D personnel (FTE)     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
  Function     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
  Qualification     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
R&D expenditure     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
Source of funds     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
Type of costs     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
Type of R&D     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time
Other     2003  NACE Rev. 2 section K included first time

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

The data are  produced in the same way in the odd and even years.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.  Intramural R & D expenditure (code 230101 in the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197) and R & D personnel (code 230201) are surveyed also in foreign-controlled EU enterprises statistics (inward FATS).

The Community innovation survey 2020 (CIS2020) (inn_cis12) (europa.eu) also collects the R&D expenditure of enterprises that form the coverage of the CIS2020 survey. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

 R&D data are used in the SNA.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
  Intramural R&D expenditure         In even years we compare with CIS data, in uneven years no other sources exist. 
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS

Not available

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  307.65  3113  2319
Final data (delivered T+18)  307.65  3113  2319
Difference (of final data)  -  -  -
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  Not applicable
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  Not applicable

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs Not available  
Data collection costs Not available  
Other costs Not available  
Total costs Not available  
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  1356 The number of respondents
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  0.68 Average report completion time of report submitters, hours per report (the report has a corresponding question)
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  Not available Not available
Total cost  Not available Not available

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  R&D in enterprise
Type of survey  Census survey covering expert sample
Combination of sample survey and census data  -
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  -
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  -
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  -
Variables the survey contributes to
The number of R&D personnel (HC) by categories of R&D personnel, by
gender, by level of formal qualification in the end of year. The number of R&D
personnel (FTE) by categories of R&D personnel during calendar year.
Intramural expenditure on R&D by type of costs, by type of R&D and by type of
product. The extramural expenditure on R&D by type of receiver. Sources of
funds for intramural and extramural R&D.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  
Collection: May-September
Publication: December
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  Enterprise    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)  -    
Stratification variable classes  -    
Population size      
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame

List of enterprises that are engaged in or are potentially engaged in research and development (R&D). The list is generated from the Business Register for Statistical Purposes

List of entities who have received R&D support, compiled by the Environmental Investment Centre and Enterprise Estonia

Enterprises who have reported R&D activities since 2016 (as part of various statistical activities)

Enterprises with knowledge-intensive business activities that were born in the previous year

   
Sample design Census survey among all potential R&D performers.    
Sample size 1478    
Survey frame quality Good    
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  N/A
Description of collected data / statistics  N/A
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  N/A
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum) 1356
Mode of data collection  
Online filling up (with alternative possibility to make printout and send by post, e-mail )
Incentives used for increasing response  Reminding letters, other contacts to the respondents
Follow-up of non-respondents  Repeated phone and e-mail reminding
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility) 92%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)
N/A
 
 
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:

 Ouestionnaire "Research and development (R&D) (in companies) 2021 (yearly)"

Questionnaire

R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:

Küsimustik "Teadus- ja arendustegevus (ettevõttes)"

Aruandevorm

Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:

 Manual

Käsiraamat_en

Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  Käsiraamat
 
18.4. Data validation
Arithmetic and qualitative controls are used in the validation process, including comparison with other data. Before data dissemination the internal coherence of the data is checked.
In determining the population and checking the received data, the data of foundations providing research support (Enterprise Estonia – EAS, Environmental Investment Centre – EIC, Estonian Reseach Council – ETAG) are used.
18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees and self-employed persons (optional) 10-49 employees and self-employed persons 50-249 employees and self-employed persons 250-and more  employees and self-employed persons TOTAL
R&D expenditure  -  -  -  -  -
R&D personnel (FTE)  -  -  -  -  -
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  -  -  -
R&D personnel (FTE)  -  - -

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  -
Data compilation method - Preliminary data
The final data can differ from preliminary data if some further checks reveal some errors. Otherwise the processing of BES data is finished at T+10.
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  N/A, Estonia is NUTS2
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  N/A
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  VAT excluded
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  N/A
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method  Not used
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description)  N/A
Variables used for weighting  N/A
Calibration method and the software used  N/A
Estimation  N/A
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top