Mobility and Transport

Italy - Investments and infrastructure

Italy - Investments and infrastructure

Italy
X

Source:

Country information

  • Overall country rank: 17
  • Area (1000 km2): 301.3
  • Nominal GDP 2016 (million €): 1 672 438
  • Population 2016 (million): 60.666
  • Expenditure per head on transport-related items 2015 (€): 2 000
  • Planned Allocation of Community funding under European Structural and Investment Funds for transport 2014-2020 (million €): 3820.35

Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T)

  • Number of proposals selected for CEF Transport (2016 call only): 13
  • Number of innovation/new technologies proposals selected for CEF Transport (2016 call only): 2
  • Global Expenditure on TEN-T - 2007-2013 (million €):  58 956

Modal split of passenger transport

X

Modal shares in % of passenger-km of passenger transport on land.
Source: DG MOVE estimates based on Eurostat, ITF, UNECE and national data, 2015.

Modal split of freight transport

X

Modal shares in % of tonne-km of freight transport on land.
Source: Eurostat, DG MOVE estimates, 2015.

Investments and Infrastructure

According to the timeliness score of the World Bank Logistics Performance Index, Italy performs slightly better than the EU average in the timeliness of shipments. Its transport infrastructure receives ratings slightly below the EU average. The completion rate of the TEN-T Core Network is close to the EU average, with most development needed as regards high speed rail.

Investments and Infrastructure

  • Rail

    Score :

    EU rank:


    X

    Rating based on a survey by the World Economic Forum, using a scale from 1 (extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (extensive and efficient). EU value is calculated as a simple average.

    Source: World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report

  • Maritime

    Score :

    EU rank:


    X

    Rating based on a survey by the World Economic Forum, using a scale from 1 (extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (extensive and efficient). EU value is calculated as a simple average.

    Source: World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report

  • X

    Rating based on a survey by the World Economic Forum, using a scale from 1 (extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (extensive and efficient). EU value is calculated as a simple average.

    Source: World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report

  • Road

    Score :

    EU rank:


    X

    Rating based on a survey by the World Economic Forum, using a scale from 1 (extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (extensive and efficient). EU value is calculated as a simple average.

    Source: World Economic Forum Global Competitiveness Report

  • X

    Length of the TEN-T Road Core Network completed at the end of the respective year, compared to the total, including planned sections and sections to be upgraded. The statistics reflect the official maps contained in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013. The term completed refers to "existing" infrastructure, which doesn’t necessarily mean that infrastructure requirements, as stated in the above mentioned regulation, are already implemented. The time horizon for the completion of the TEN-T Core Network is 2030. Therefore the categories "completed", "to be upgraded" and "planned" give a rather general overview as defined by Member States, since there is no systematic definition of these categories at EU level. Some data discrepancies might be observed across Member States, due to the geographical position and size of the transport infrastructure network of the countries concerned.

    Source: DG MOVE TENTec

  • X

    Length of the TEN-T Conventional Rail Core Network completed at the end of the respective year, compared to the total, including planned sections and sections to be upgraded. The statistics reflect the official maps contained in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013. The term completed refers to "existing" infrastructure, which doesn’t necessarily mean that infrastructure requirements, as stated in the above mentioned regulation, are already implemented. Time horizon for the completion of the TEN-T Core Network is 2030. Therefore the categories "completed", "to be upgraded" and "planned" give a rather general overview as defined by Member States, since there is no systematic definition of these categories on EU level. Some data discrepancies might be observed across Member States, due to the geographical position and size of the transport infrastructure network of the countries concerned.

    Source: DG MOVE TENTec

  • X

    Length of the TEN-T High Speed Rail Core Network completed at the end of the respective year, compared to the total, including planned sections and sections to be upgraded. The statistics reflect the official maps contained in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013. The term completed refers to "existing" infrastructure, which doesn’t necessarily mean that infrastructure requirements, as stated in the above mentioned regulation, are already implemented. Time horizon for the completion of the TEN-T Core Network is 2030. Therefore the categories "completed", "to be upgraded" and "planned" give a rather general overview as defined by Member States, since there is no systematic definition of these categories on EU level. Some data discrepancies might be observed across Member States, due to the geographical position and size of the transport infrastructure network of the countries concerned.

    Source: DG MOVE TEN-Tec

  • Inland Waterways

    Score :

    EU rank:


    X

    Length of the TEN-T Inland Waterways Core Network completed at the end of the respective year, compared to the total, including planned sections and sections to be upgraded. The statistics reflect the official maps contained in Annex I of Regulation (EU) No 1315/2013. The term completed refers to "existing" infrastructure, which doesn’t necessarily mean that infrastructure requirements, as stated in the above mentioned regulation, are already implemented. Time horizon for the completion of the TEN-T Core Network is 2030. Therefore the categories "completed", "to be upgraded" and "planned" give a rather general overview as defined by Member States, since there is no systematic definition of these categories on EU level. Some data discrepancies might be observed across Member States, due to the geographical position and size of the transport infrastructure network of the countries concerned.

    Source: DG MOVE TENTec

  • Horizontal

    Score :

    EU rank:


    X

    Timeliness of shipments in reaching destination within the scheduled or expected delivery time, rated from "hardly ever within schedule" (1) to "nearly always in schedule" (5). EU value is calculated as a simple average.

    Source: World Bank Logistics Performance Indicators