TOPIC : Standardisation of components for cost-efficient fuel cell systems for automotive applications
|Publication date:||19 January 2016|
|Types of action:||FCH2-RIA Research and Innovation action|
|DeadlineModel: Opening date:||single-stage 19 January 2016||Deadline:||03 May 2016 17:00:00|
|Time Zone : (Brussels time)|
Topic DescriptionSpecific Challenge:
PEMFC system technology has demonstrated its maturity for automotive application, but still does not meet the cost requirements for a broad market introduction. The reasons are diverse, including proprietary system architectures and component concepts, low volume and lack of a competitive chain of suppliers. Standardisation of interfaces and system components is considered to be an efficient pathway to reduce cost, accelerate market introduction of automotive fuel cell technology. Moreover development and qualification of a capable European supplier base is of major importance to strengthen Europe's competitiveness in the emerging international market for fuel cell electric vehicles.
For the sake of clarity, by standardisation is meant the development of common components and their interfaces and not the developments of new standards and regulations.
Whereas standardisation of refuelling infrastructure is approaching maturity, on the fuel cell system component level the variance is still very high and needs more alignment. Each manufacturer of a fuel cell system typically develops and uses its own components and interfaces, mainly based on proprietary requirements, whereas the similarity of requirements appears to be high (compare with “Auto Stack”* specification).
*FCH JU funded project AutoStack; http://autostack.zsw-bw.deScope:
Components suitable for OEM-wide standardisation include air supply, fuel supply, valves, sensors, cooling, water management, DC/DC converters, current connectors, etc. In addition, some of these components affect safety classification of fuel cell systems and must be qualified and tested in order to comply with Automotive Safety Integrity Level (ASIL*) standards. Differentiation between OEMs is expected with regard to fuel cell architecture, fuel cell stack and system controls and, therefore, these should not be the focus of the project.
Successful proposals must address the following objectives:
- identify and select a minimum of three components or subsystems suitable and relevant for standardisation
- align specifications and interfaces for each component and subsystem
- define and agree on standardized verification, validation and qualification test protocols
- benchmark components and subsystems in conjunction with their operating range with the state-of-the-art. This includes testing of available market components and engineering samples from project partners
- develop and build the selected components and test them against the agreed specifications
- generate inputs for further development of advanced PEMFC system components in order to fulfil broader requirements of OEMs
- if meaningful, liaise with relevant ISO and IEC committees and transfer of recommendations for standardized system components and subsystems to industry codes & standards
- assess the cost impact upon standardisation
The consortium should include at least two automotive OEMs, a fuel cell system integrator, and relevant suppliers to the automotive industry capable of fulfilling automotive standards. To strengthen the industry consensus and acceptance of the proposed component standardisation, participation of further OEMs and main automotive suppliers is highly recommended, even if only with an observer role. The components to be standardized are expected to be at least TRL 4 at the start of the project and TRL 7 at the end of the project.
The FCH 2 JU considers that proposals requesting a contribution from the EU of EUR 3 million each would allow the specific challenges to be addressed appropriately. Nonetheless, this does not preclude submission and selection of proposals requesting other amounts.
Expected duration: 3 years
A maximum of 1 project may be funded under this topic.
*ASIL is a risk classification scheme defined by the ISO 26262 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles standardExpected Impact:
The expected impact must include:
- Industry supported recommendations for aligned interfaces and specifications for key PEMFC system components
- At least three PEMFC system components or subsystems modified, adapted and built to the recommended specifications/interfaces, including the component validation in an existing complete PEMFC system
- A set of standardised verification, validation and qualification test protocols for selected components
- Transparency on the reduction of development and manufacturing costs leveraged by standardisation
- Clear added value for the competitiveness of the European component supplier base
- Reduced certification efforts based on dissemination of a white paper for industrial standards
Topic conditions and documents
Please read carefully all provisions below before the preparation of your application.
- List of countries and applicable rules for funding: described in part A of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme.
Note also that a number of non-EU/non-Associated Countries that are not automatically eligible for funding have made specific provisions for making funding available for their participants in Horizon 2020 projects (follow the links to China, Japan, Republic of Korea, Mexico, Russia, Taiwan).
- Eligibility and admissibility conditions: described in part B and C of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme. The following exceptions apply (see 'chapter 3.3. Call management rules' from the AWP2016 and specific topic description): 'For some, well-identified topics it is therefore duly justified to require as an additional condition for participation that at least one constituent entity of the Industry Grouping or Research Grouping is among the participants in the consortium.'
Proposal page limits and layout: Please refer to Part B of the FCH2 JU proposal template.
3.1 Evaluation criteria and procedure, scoring and threshold: described in part H of the General Annexes of the General Work Programme. As part of the Panel Review, hearings will be organised for Innovation Actions (IA) proposals.
3.2 Submission and evaluation process: Guide to the submission and evaluation process
- Indicative timetable for evaluation and grant agreement:
Information on the outcome of evaluation: maximum 5 months from the deadline for submission.
Signature of grant agreements: maximum 8 months from the deadline for submission.
- Provisions, proposal templates and evaluation forms for the type(s) of action(s) under this topic:
FCH2 JU Research and Innovation Action (FCH2-RIA):
Specific provisions and funding rates
Proposal templates are available after entering the submission tool below.
Standard evaluation form
FCH2 JU Model Grant Agreement
Annotated Grant Agreement
- Additional provisions:
Horizon 2020 budget flexibility
Technology readiness levels (TRL) – where a topic description refers to TRL, these definitions apply.
Financial support to Third Parties – where a topic description foresees financial support to Third Parties, these provisions apply.
- Open access must be granted to all scientific publications resulting from Horizon 2020 actions, and proposals must refer to measures envisaged. Where relevant, proposals should also provide information on how the participants will manage the research data generated and/or collected during the project, such as details on what types of data the project will generate, whether and how this data will be exploited or made accessible for verification and re-use, and how it will be curated and preserved.
- Additional documents:
FCH2 JU 2016 Work Plan
FCH2 JU Multi Annual Work Plan
FCH2 JU – Regulation of establishment
H2020 Work Programme 2016-17: General Annexes
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 - Regulation of Establishment
Legal basis: Horizon 2020 Rules for Participation
- Flash-call Info en
No submission system is open for this topic.
H2020 Online Manual your online guide on the procedures from proposal submission to managing your grant.
Participant Portal FAQ – Submission of proposals.
National Contact Points (NCP) - contact your NCP for further assistance.
Research Enquiry Service – ask questions about any aspect of European research in general and the EU Research Framework Programmes in particular.
Enterprise Europe Network – contact your EEN national contact for advice to businesses with special focus on SMEs. The support includes guidance on the EU research funding.
IT Helpdesk- contact the Participant Portal IT helpdesk for questions such as forgotten passwords, access rights and roles, technical aspects of submission of proposals, etc.
FCH2 JU members:
Industry Grouping, Hydrogen Europe
Research Grouping, N.ERGHY
FCH2 JU Programme Office, Helpdesk: email@example.com
Ethics – for compliance with ethical issues, see the Participant Portal and Science and Society Portal
European IPR Helpdesk assists you on intellectual property issues
CEN and CENELEC, the European Standards Organisations, advise you how to tackle standardisation in your project proposal. Contact CEN-CENELEC Research Helpdesk at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The European Charter for Researchers and the Code of Conduct for their recruitment
Partner Search Services help you find a partner organisation for your proposal