European Union legislation (
EU 2011) refers to sugars as 'all monosaccharides and disaccharides present in food, but excludes polyols', while foods with no added sugars are defined as foods without 'any added monosaccharides or disaccharides', or without 'any added food containing monosaccharides or disaccharides which is used for its sweetening purposes' ( EC 2008, EU 2011) . a
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), in its scientific opinion on Dietary Reference Values for carbohydrates and dietary fibre (
EFSA 2010a), refers to added sugars as 'sucrose, fructose, glucose, starch hydrolysates (glucose syrup, high-fructose syrup) and other isolated sugar preparations used as such or added during food preparation and manufacturing ' (not including the sugars present in unsweetened fruit juice or honey as added sugars), and total sugars as the sum of added sugars and endogenous sugars present in fruits, vegetables, cereals, as well as lactose in milk products. The United States (US) Institute of Medicine (IoM) provides a similar definition for added sugars ( IOM 2006).
For the World Health Organization (
WHO 2015), the term sugars includes intrinsic sugars, which are those incorporated within the structure of intact fruit and vegetables; sugars naturally present in milk (lactose and galactose); and free sugars, which are 'monosaccharides and disaccharides added to foods and beverages by the manufacturer, cook or consumer, and sugars naturally present in honey, syrups, fruit juices and fruit juice concentrates '. The main difference between the EFSA and WHO definitions is that the WHO 'free sugars' covers not only all sugars added to foods during manufacture or by the consumer, but also those present in fruit juice and honey or syrups.
In the US, the Food and Drug Administration (
FDA 2017), states that 'the definition of added sugars includes sugars that are either added during the processing of foods, or are packaged as such, and include sugars (free, mono- and disaccharides), sugars from syrups and honey, and sugars from concentrated fruit or vegetable juices that are in excess of what would be expected from the same volume of 100 percent fruit or vegetable juice of the same type. The definition excludes fruit or vegetable juice concentrated from 100 percent fruit juice that is sold to consumers (e.g. frozen 100 percent fruit juice concentrate) as well as some sugars found in fruit and vegetable juices, jellies, jams, preserves, and fruit spreads'.
For the purposes of this Brief, the term
sugars, added sugars, total sugars, intrinsic sugars and free sugars and will refer to the definitions provided above, while the term 'sugar' will refer to sucrose exclusively . b
Sugars belong to the family of carbohydrates. In the EU legislation
(EU 2011), the term 'carbohydrates' refers to 'any carbohydrate which is metabolised by humans, and includes polyols' (see 1.2). Carbohydrates can be single unit molecules, but can also be made up of several units linked together by a variety of chemical bonds. Major dietary carbohydrates, including sugars, can be classified as described in Table 1.
In the EU (
EC 2008, EU 2011) sweeteners are referred to as food additive substances used to 'impart a sweet taste to foods or in table-top sweeteners'. Table-top sweeteners 'shall mean preparations of permitted sweeteners, which may contain other food additives and/or food ingredients and which are intended for sale to the final consumer as a substitute for sugars'.
In order to be included in the list of EU approved food additives, and in addition to the general requirements of food additives, sweeteners must serve one or more of these purposes: i) 'replacing sugars for the production of energy-reduced food, non-cariogenic food or food with no added sugars' or ii) 'replacing sugars where this permits an increase in the shelf life of the food'
. Following the above definition, for the purposes of this Brief, the term 'sweeteners' will refer to those non-nutritive (or low caloric) food additives that are approved for use as sugar replacers in the EU and are reported in Table 3. e
Sweeteners can be of two categories: high-intensity sweeteners, which are substances with an intense sweet taste and with no energy value that are used to replace sugars in foods
(EFSA 2011) and polyols f , defined as 'alcohols containing more than two hydroxyl groups', which are low calorie sugar replacers, but which can also exert other technological functions in food and can be used for purposes other than sweetening. d
Back to top Back to paragraph
Common monosaccharides include glucose, fructose and galactose, while the main dietary disaccharides are sucrose (consisting of glucose and fructose) and lactose (consisting of glucose and galactose). The sources of these are described in Table 2 and include plants, especially fruits and vegetables where most mono- and disaccharides are intrinsically occurring. In addition, sugars are added to foods to impart a sweet taste, during cooking, table top use or in processed foods and beverages; this includes honey, molasses and various syrups such as isoglucose, or malt, corn or sugar beet syrups.
Table 2: Main dietary sugars (mono- and disaccharide carbohydrates) and their sources
SACN 2015, Present Knowledge in Nutrition 2012
Dietary sources and metabolism
The predominant disaccharide, sucrose is naturally present in large quantities in sugar cane and sugar beet, as well as in many vegetables, roots and fruits. Major dietary sources include, apart from table-top use and cooking, a variety of processed foods and beverages sweetened with sugar, e.g. soft drinks and juices
, sports and energy drinks as well as confectionary products, sweet and savoury snacks, sweet spreads and jams, dairy products and ice-cream. In the body, sucrose is metabolised into glucose and fructose. a
Another major disaccharide, predominantly found naturally in milk and dairy products. In the body, lactose is hydrolysed into galactose and glucose.
Maltose, (made up from 2 molecules of glucose) is the least common of the three major disaccharides, and is found in nature in small amounts (e.g. in barley, wheat, germinating grain). Major dietary sources include beer, cereals, cooked sweet potatoes, pasta and sweetened processed products. Trehalose is also made from two glucose molecules; the difference with maltose lies in the configuration of the chemical bond between the glucose molecules. It is found in yeast products, mushrooms and crustaceans.
These monosaccharides occur naturally in small amounts in fruits, vegetables and plant juices. Apart from the consumption of the above, dietary sources include honey and syrups. Free galactose is rare in foods, except in fermented and lactase-hydrolysed milks.
The addition of sugars is not authorised in fruit juices, fruit juice from concentrate, concentrated fruit juice, water extracted fruit juice, and dehydrated/powdered fruit juice, and is only allowed in fruit nectars under specific requirements a (EU 2012).
Major dietary sources of sweeteners (Table 3) include table-top use during cooking or beverage preparation, as well as through consumption of processed foods and beverages.
Table 3: Main sweeteners and their sources
High- intensity sweeteners
Use in foods and dietary sources (ISA 2016 )
Replacing sugar in a variety of processed foods
and beverages such as, flavoured carbonated
and non-carbonated drinks/soft drinks,
confectionery, desserts, jams, chewing gums
Salt of Aspartame-Acesulfame
Use in foods and dietary sources ( EPA 2016)
Replacing sugar in a variety of processed foods
e.g. energy-reduced or with no added sugar products)
confectionery (e.g. hard and soft candies)
fine bakery wares (e.g. cakes, biscuits)
Jams, crystallised fruit
Back to top Back to paragraph
In the EU, Regulation (EU) 1169/2011 (
EU 2011) on food information to consumers requires mandatory nutrition declaration for sugars, under carbohydrates (stating amount of g per 100 g of product), in prepacked foods. For labelling purposes, the reference intake for sugars of an average adult (8400 kJ/2000 kcal) is 90 g/day. In addition, the same regulation states that, in conversion factors for the calculation of energy, carbohydrates (including sugars) have an energy value of 4 kcal/g.
Under Regulation (EU) 1924/2006 (
EC 2006) for health and nutrition claims made on foods, the following sugars-related nutrition claims are permitted:
Sugar-free claims, 'may only be made where the product contains no more than 0,5 g of sugar per 100 g or 100 ml'.
With no added sugars claims 'may only be made where the product does not contain any added mono- or disaccharides or any other food used for its sweetening properties. If sugars are naturally present in the food, the following indication should also appear on the label: CONTAINS NATURALLY OCCURRING SUGARS
'. Low sugars claims 'may only be made where the product contains no more than 5g of sugar per 100 g for solids or 2,5 g of sugar per 100 ml for liquid'.
In the EU, in general, if a food additive belongs to the category/functional class 'sweetener' it must be designated by the name of that category (i.e., 'sweetener'), followed by its specific name or, if appropriate, E number on the food packaging (
EC 2008, EU 2011).
Regulation (EU) 1169/2011 (
EU 2011) on food information to consumers requires any food containing a sweetener(s) authorised pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 ( EC 2008, EU 2011) ( i.e. the sweeteners referred to in this Brief) to carry 'with sweetener(s)' as a statement that shall accompany the name of the food . Foods containing both an added sugar or sugars and a sweetener or sweeteners authorised pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 shall carry the statement 'with sugar(s) and sweetener(s)' as a statement that shall accompany the name of the food.
The sales description of a table-top sweetener shall include the term ‘…-based table-top sweetener', using the ame(s) of the sweetener(s) used in its composition. The labelling of a table-top sweetener containing polyols and/or aspartame and/or aspartame-acesulfame salt shall bear the following warnings: for polyols: ‘excessive consumption may induce laxative effects’, and for aspartame/aspartame-acesulfame salt: ‘contains a source of phenylalanine’.Table-top sweeteners are exempted from mandatory nutrition declaration (
Foods containing aspartame/aspartame-acesulfame salt authorised pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 shall be accompanied by a statement 'contains aspartame (a source of phenylalanine)' on the label, if the substance is designated in the list of ingredients only by its E number; in cases where aspartame/aspartame-acesulfame salt is designated in the list of ingredients by its specific name, the statement appearing on the label shall be 'contains a source of phenylalanine'.
Foods containing more than 10% added polyols authorised pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 (
EC 2008, EU 2011) shall be labelled with the particular 'excessive consumption may produce laxative effects'. In addition, Regulation (EU) 1169/2011 (EU 2011) states that the energy value to be declared in the nutrition declaration shall be calculated using the conversion factors of 10 kJ/g - 2,4 kcal/g for polyols and 0 kJ/g - 0 kcal/g for erythritol. The unit of measurement to be used in the nutrition declaration for mass of polyols is grams (g), and the order of presentation of the information, as appropriate, is indicated in Regulation (EU) 1169/2011.
As regards nutrition claims foreseen under Regulation (EU) 1924/2006 (
EC 2006), some apply to table-top sweeteners, as is the case of food low in energy and energy-free food. Two sweetener related health claims have been approved for use under specific conditions ( EU 2012), following EFSA opinions ( EFSA 2011, EFSA 2011); both relate to the use of intense sweeteners and polyols as sugar replacers (consumption of foods/drinks containing intense sweeteners and/or polyols instead of sugar contributes to the maintenance of tooth mineralisation and to reduction of post-prandial glycaemic responses compared to sugar- containing foods/drinks see also Table 5).
Back to top Back to paragraph
A number of national or international institutions have recently examined the potential impact of sugars consumption on health, focusing mainly on effects on body weight management, Type 2 Diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular parameters such as blood glucose, pressure, lipids, cholesterol and dental health. The statements or opinions of these institutions, as well as the strength of the supporting evidence, are shown in Table 4. Sugar Sweetened Beverages (SSBs) consumption is high in many parts of the world and is considered to significantly contribute to added sugar intake (
WHO 2018, CDC website, EC 2018). A considerable amount of evidence presented in this brief includes SSBs.
Table 4: Health effects related to sugars intake as described by food- and health-related organisations.
Note that each institution may define sugars differently
Effect of sugar intake on cardiovascular health
Coronary Heart Disease
Based on moderate evidence, no significant association observed between sugars consumption and coronary event incidence.
'the evidence regarding the association between the intake of mono- and disaccharides or the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages respectively, and the risk of CHD is judged as insufficient'.
Moderate evidence indicates that 'higher intake of added sugars, especially in the form of sugar sweetened beverages, is consistently associated with increased risk of […] CHD in adults'.
Moderate evidence indicates that 'higher intake of added sugars, especially in the form of sugar sweetened beverages, is consistently associated with increased risk of […] stroke […] in adults'.
'Concerning…blood pressure, in the short- and medium-term intervention studies, deleterious metabolic effects of sugars were observed, in the case of very high consumption and/or consumption associated with an excess energy intake. However, the long-term impact of these changes on the occurrence of pathologies remains unknown'.
Based on limited evidence, no significant effect is demonstrated for diets differing in the proportion of sugars on systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure.
Suggestive evidence that frequent consumption of SSBs has an unfavourable effect on blood pressure.
'There is possible evidence that there is no association between long-term intake of fructose or sucrose and blood pressure increase'.
'There is possible evidence that there is no association between the intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and the risk of hypertension. This judgement is based on 1 cohort study only, but is confirmed by the judgement of the individual components of sweetened beverages like fructose and sucrose'.
'…evidence suggests that excessive fructose intake results in increased blood pressure in children and young adult'.
'…evidence suggests that added sugars are a source of excess fructose and that reduction of fructose from added sugars is likely to decrease uric acid, possibly improving blood pressure in children. However, further research on this topic is needed to test whether a reduction in added sugars results in improved blood pressure in children'.
Moderate evidence indicates that 'higher intake of added sugars, especially in the form of sugar sweetened beverages, is consistently associated with increased risk of […] hypertension in adults'.
'Observational and intervention studies indicate a consistent relationship between higher added sugars intake and higher blood pressure…' (moderate evidence).
Although some evidence exists that high intakes (>20 E%) of sugars may increase serum triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations, the available data are not sufficient to set an upper limit for (added) sugar intake.
'epidemiological studies indicate a hypertriglyceridemia effect of sugars provided in the form of sugar-sweetened beverages, but these data do not show a specific effect, independent of total energy intake'.
'The effect of sugars containing fructose (sucrose, HFCS), the respective roles of excess energy or sugar intake per se, and the effect of co-ingestion of glucose and fructose, are still poorly understood. But in the intervention studies, daily intakes of fructose above 50 g/d can lead to an increase in fasting and/or post-prandial blood triglycerides'.
Based on limited evidence, no significant effect is demonstrated for diets differing in the proportion of sugars on fasting total cholesterol, fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) or high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration, or fasting triacylglycerol concentration.
Insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on effects on plasma lipids with respect to fructose or sucrose.
Limited-suggestive evidence that high intake of SSBs might be associated with dyslipidaemia indicating that the specific food source of sugar might influence metabolic response.
'Current evidence supports the associations of added sugars with […] and increased dyslipidaemia, all of which are demonstrated CVD risk factors'.
'The preponderance of evidence […] weighs in favor of improved triglycerides and HDL in children with low consumption of added sugars'.
'there is insufficient evidence regarding the influence of increased intake of mono- or disaccharides on the plasma levels of total and/or LDL cholesterol'.
'there is insufficient evidence regarding the influence of increased intake on mono- or disaccharides on the plasma levels of HDL cholesterol'.
'the evidence is judged as probable that there is no association between a fructose intake of < 100 g/day and the fasting plasma triglyceride concentration as well as between a fructose intake of < 50 g/day and the postprandial plasma triglyceride concentration, respectively'.
'There is convincing evidence that with higher fructose intake of up to 350 g/day, the fasting plasma triglyceride concentration increases'.
'The evidence regarding the effects of other mono- and disaccharides on plasma triglycerides is insufficient'.
'Observational and intervention studies indicate a consistent relationship between higher added sugars intake and higher […] serum triglycerides'. (moderate evidence).
'A higher than recommended intake of added sugars among adolescents may be positively associated with multiple measures known to increase cardiovascular disease risk'.
'Data in adolescents reflect interventional studies in adults suggesting that higher fructose consumption (from added sugars) is also associated with multiple factors that increase risk for cardiovascular disease…'.
Effect of sugar intake on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and blood glucose
'Although there is some evidence that high intakes (>20 E%) of sugars may increase serum triglyceride […] and cholesterol concentrations, and that >20 to 25 E% might adversely affect glucose and insulin response, the available data are not sufficient to set an upper limit for (added) sugar intake'.
'Concerning glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity, the studies indicate that only a very large increase in fructose intake, of around 80 g/d, leads to a decrease in hepatic sensitivity to insulin. This effect, however, is modest and is not accompanied by a clinically significant increase in fasting blood glucose'.
'A limited number of epidemiological cohort studies indicate an increase in the incidence of diabetes in high consumers of sugar-sweetened beverages; however this is in part linked to the weight status'.
For those pathologies where weight gain and obesity are established risk factors, in particular for T2DM, the contribution of sugars to excess energy intake must not be overlooked.
Based on limited evidence, there is no effect of sugars consumption on fasting blood glucose concentration and blood insulin concentrations.
Based on limited evidence, there is 'no consistent evidence of an association between diets differing in the proportion of sugars in relation to incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus'. Sucrose and fructose were also individually examined with same findings.
Based on moderate evidence, an association was found between greater sugars-sweetened beverage (SSB) soft-drink consumption and higher incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, while there was insufficient that included fruit juices. The association direction indicates that 'greater consumption of SSBs is detrimental to health'.
'the evidence regarding an association between the total intake of mono- and disaccharides and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus is judged as insufficient'.
'The evidence regarding an association between the intake of glucose and fructose and the risk of diabetes is insufficient'.
'the evidence regarding a lack of an association between sucrose intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus is judged as probable'.
'the evidence regarding a lack of an association between lactose intake and the risk of diabetes is judged as possible'.
Majority of studies indicate 'an increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus due to regular consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. The evidence regarding this association is judged as probable'.
Evidence for effects of sugars intake on glucose and insulin responses is limited.
Probable evidence that high consumption of SSBs increases T2DM risk.
Studies related to added sugars intake and insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in children are inconclusive.
'To date, added sugars appear to have a relationship with insulin resistance in children who are overweight, but this finding was not demonstrated in normal-weight children'.
'Strong evidence shows that higher consumption of added sugars, especially sugar-sweetened beverages, increases the risk of type 2 diabetes among adults and this relationship is not fully explained by body weight'.
Effect of sugar intake on cancer
For those pathologies where weight gain and obesity are established risk factors, in particular for endometrial cancer and breast cancer, the contribution of sugars to excess energy intake must not be overlooked.
Based on adequate evidence, no association was found between consumption of SSBs and colon cancer incidence.
Insufficient evidence regarding an association between intake of monosaccharides and oesophagus, colorectum and breast cancer risk.
'There is possible evidence of a positive association between the intake of monosaccharides and malignant tumours of the pancreas'
Insufficient evidence regarding an association between intake of disaccharides and risk of cancer of oesophagus and endometrium.
'There is possible evidence of a lack of a risk relation between the intake of disaccharides and the development of malignant tumours in the colorectum, breast and pancreas'
'There is also possible evidence regarding a lack of an association between the intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and cancer of the colorectum and pancreas'.
Effect of sugar intake on BMI/ weight management
'a cause and effect relationship has not been established between total sugar intake and body weight gain'.
'the evidence relating high intake of sugars (mainly as added sugars), compared to high intakes of starch, to weight gain is inconsistent for solid foods'.
'However, there is some evidence that high intakes of sugars in the form of sugar-sweetened beverages might contribute to weight gain. The available evidence is insufficient to set an upper limit for sugars based on their effects on body weight. Evidence on the relationship of sugar-sweetened beverages and body weight should be considered when developing food-based dietary guidelines'.
'A higher than recommended intake of free sugars, particularly SSBs in children and adolescents, is associated with increased incidence of […] adiposity'.
'Sugars-containing beverages do not promote satiety compared the equivalent amount of sugars in solid form and therefore induce excessive energy intakes'.
'Reducing the intake of SSBs by replacing them with water in children and adolescents is associated with reduced weight and adiposity'.
'Weight gain is related to an excess energy intake. Sugars and particularly sugar-sweetened beverages contribute to this excess energy intake'.
'Concerning the effect of sugars on adiposity and the distribution of body fat, the data are too limited to reach any conclusion'.
'sugars, and more particularly in liquid form (sodas, nectars, fruit juices produced from concentrates, fresh fruit juices, smoothies, etc.) contribute to weight gain, with a convincing level of evidence'.
Based on adequate evidence, sugars consumption has an effect on energy intake; the direction of the effect demonstrates that greater consumption of sugars is detrimental to health (relevant in free living individuals not subject to energy restriction).
In cohort studies, there is limited and conflicting evidence on the relationship between SSBs consumption and Body Mass Index (BMI).
In cohort studies, 'overall there is no consistent evidence of a significant change in body fat amount or distribution with sugars-sweetened beverage consumption assessed in childhood or adolescence' (limited evidence).
In randomised control trials (RCTs), and based on limited evidence, SSBs consumption has an effect on BMI; 'the direction of the effect demonstrates that greater consumption of SSBs is detrimental to health.'
'The evidence regarding the relevance of monosaccharides for the risk of obesity is insufficient'
The evidence regarding the relevance of sucrose or added sugar, respectively, for the risk of obesity in children, adolescents and adults is insufficient.
'The available cohort and intervention studies regarding adults mainly show that a higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages is accompanied by an increased risk of obesity. Therefore, the respective evidence is judged as probable'.
'The overall evidence regarding an increased risk of obesity due to higher consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages in children and adolescents is […]only judged as possible'.
'The evidence regarding an increased risk of obesity especially in children and adolescents with initially already increased BMI or already existing overweight is also judged as possible'.
In children, 'current evidence supports the associations of added sugars with increased energy intake, increased adiposity, increased central adiposity […] , all which are demonstrated CVD risk factors'.
'children and adolescents who have high intakes of dietary sugars (specifically from SSBs and added sugars) tend to have higher daily energy intakes compared with similar populations with lower intakes of dietary sugars'.
In children, 'higher SSB and added sugars intake has been strongly linked to excess weight gain and an increased risk of obesity'.
'Strong and consistent evidence shows that intake of added sugars from food and/or sugar sweetened beverages are associated with excess body weight in children and adults'; reduction of added sugars and/or SSBs in the diet reduces body mass index in both children and adults.
'a cause and effect relationship has been established between the consumption of sugar-containing foods/drinks at an exposure frequency of four times daily or more and an increased tooth demineralisation'
'frequent consumption of sugar-containing foods can increase risk of dental caries, especially when prophylactic measures, e.g. oral hygiene and fluoride prophylaxis, are insufficient'.
available data do not allow the setting of an upper limit for sugars on the basis of a risk reduction for dental caries, 'as caries development related to consumption of sucrose and other cariogenic carbohydrates does not depend only on the amount of sugar consumed, but it is also influenced by various other lifestyle factors…'.
Effect of sugar intake on dental health
Moderate quality evidence from cohort studies suggests a positive association between levels of free sugars intake and dental caries; higher rates of caries when free sugars intake exceeds 10% of total energy. In three population studies with very low quality of evidence, lower levels of caries development were observed with approx. free sugars intake of 5%.
'A higher than recommended intake of free sugars, particularly SSBs in children and adolescents, is associated with increased incidence of dental caries…'.
Based on moderate evidence, there is an association between amount of sugars consumed and dental caries in mixed and permanent dentition; 'The direction of the association indicates that greater consumption of sugars is detrimental to oral health'. No significant association reported between the frequency of sugars consumption and the risk of developing dental caries in mixed and permanent dentition.
Adequate evidence for an association between the amount and frequency of SSBs and detriment to deciduous dentition. 'The direction of the association indicates that greater consumption of sugars sweetened beverages is detrimental to oral health'.
Amount and frequency of consumption of sugar containing foods and/or confectionary is associated with dental caries. 'The direction of the association indicates that greater consumption of sugars containing foods and/or sugars confectionery is detrimental to oral health'. For deciduous dentition there is limited evidence, while for mixed and permanent dentition the evidence is moderate.
'The DGAC concurs with the World Health Organization's commissioned systematic review that moderate consistent evidence supports a relationship between the amount of free sugars intake and the development of dental caries among children and adults. Moderate evidence also indicates that caries are lower when free sugars intake is less than 10 percent of energy intake'.
Effect of sugar intake on dietary quality
'Observed negative associations between added sugar intake and micronutrient density of the diet are mainly related to patterns of intake of the foods from which added sugars in the diet are derived rather than to intake of added sugars'.
Higher sucrose intake (>10 E%) is associated with lower intake of many micronutrients and dietary fibre and a higher intake of saturated fatty acids in Nordic countries.
Effect of sugar intake on metabolic syndrome
'The evidence regarding an association between the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and the occurrence of the metabolic syndrome is judged as possible'.
Other effects of sugar intake on health
'Observational studies, show that SSB intake during infancy and early childhood is associated with SSB intake in childhood and adolescence', but cannot demonstrate causality.
'For the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, a small number of intervention studies show that an excess energy intake, in particular in the form of fructose, increases the concentration of intrahepatic lipids in healthy subjects. The epidemiological data are, however, insufficient to assess the role of sugars in the occurrence of this pathology'.
'the introduction of added sugars during infancy appears to be particularly harmful and should be avoided'.
The safety of sweeteners examined in this Brief has been extensively reviewed and (re)evaluated by a variety of competent authorities, including the European Food Safety Authority
(EFSA webpage) and other national authorities such e.g. as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA webpage). All sweeteners discussed here are approved and considered safe to use in the EU. The focus is therefore on nutrition and diet related health effects. For sweeteners, the main areas of focus refer to their use as sugars replacers and their effects on weight gain loss or maintenance, cardiovascular parameters, such as blood glucose and lipids, T2DM, dental health, and other categories such as appetite or gastrointestinal health (Table 5).
Table 5: Health effects related to sweeteners intake as described by food- and health-related organisations
Note that each institution may refer to sweeteners using different terminology.
Effect of sweeteners intake on Cardiovascular health
'The majority of observational studies showed no effects on lipid profile related to intense sweeteners. Two studies reported that replacing sugars with aspartame reduced plasma concentrations of triglycerides but the data are too limited to conclude that intense sweeteners have a beneficial effect on lipid profile'.
Insufficient data to conclude if displacing caloric sweeteners with non-caloric sweeteners in beverages and foods benefits 'cardio-metabolic risk factors'.
Effect of sweeteners intake on type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and blood glucose
'a cause and effect relationship has been established between the consumption of foods/drinks containing xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, lactitol, isomalt, erythritol, D-tagatose, isomaltulose, sucralose or polydextrose instead of sugar and reduction in post-prandial blood glucose responses (without disproportionally increasing post-prandial insulinaemic responses) as compared to sugar-containing foods/drinks /drinks'. This scientific substantiation also applies to intense sweeteners.
'A cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of foods and beverages in which sugars have been replaced by intense sweeteners and maintenance of normal blood glucose concentrations'.
For blood glucose regulation short- and medium-term intense sweetener consumption 'does not result in the post-prandial elevation of blood glucose or insulin levels in healthy or diabetic subjects'.
In diabetics, regular consumption of intense sweeteners as sugar substitutes on blood glucose control has not demonstrated any benefits.
'The most robust epidemiological studies on type 2 diabetes do not show a higher or lower incidence of diabetes' in daily intense sweetener consumers.
'For some people with diabetes who are accustomed to sugar-sweetened products, nonnutritive sweeteners (containing few or no calories) may be an acceptable substiute for nutritive sweeeteners (those containing calories such as sugar, honey, agave syrup) when consumed in moderation'.
'Long-term observational studies conducted in adults provide inconsistent evidence of an association between low-calorie sweeteners and risk of type 2 diabetes'.
Effect of sweeteners intake on BMI/ weight management
'a cause and effect relationship has not been established between the consumption of foods and beverages in which sugars have been replaced by intense sweeteners and contribution to the maintenance or achievement of a normal body weight'.
Replacing free sugars with non-nutritive sweeteners may reduce short term energy intake in the short-term, but their effectiveness remains to be evaluated as a strategy for weight management in the long term. There is a lack of research in children on the effects of non-nutritive sweeteners.
'Randomised controlled trials conducted in adults indicate that increasing or decreasing the percentage of total dietary energy as sugars when consuming an ad libitum diet, either through the substitution of other macronutrient components or by replacing sugars with non-caloric sweeteners, leads to corresponding relative increases or decreases in energy intake'.
'Evidence from trials conducted in children and adolescents indicates that consumption of sugars-sweetened beverages, as compared with non-calorically sweetened beverages, results in greater weight gain and increases in body mass index, however the evidence is limited to a small number of studies'.
'Robust evidence from RCTs suggests non-caloric sweeteners are useful in weight maintenance/loss as they enable the calorie content of foods and drinks to be reduced while maintaining the same sweet taste desired by consumers. How these study outcomes reflect behaviour in reali life is however unclear'.
In most cases, the use of intense sweeteners as sugar substitutes 'results in a decrease in short-term energy intake due to their low calorie content and the lack of compensation. However, the available data cover insufficient time periods to guarantee the maintenance of this effect over the medium or long term'.
no conclusions can be drawn as to the long-term effect of replacing caloric sweeteners with intense sweeteners on the weight of regular adult consumers of sweet products. Similar for children and adolescents.
'Moderate and generally consistent evidence from short-term RCTs conducted in adults and children supports that replacing sugar-containing sweeteners with low-calorie sweeteners reduces calorie intake, body weight, and adiposity'.
'Long-term observational studies conducted in children and adults provide inconsistent evidence of an association between low-calorie sweeteners and body weight, as compared to sugar-containing sweeteners'.
'Since the long-term effects of low-calorie sweeteners are still uncertain, those sweeteners should not be recommended for use as a primary replacement/substitute for added sugars in foods and beverages'.
Insufficient data to conclude if replacing caloric with non-caloric sweeteners reduces added sugars or carbohydrate intakes and benefits appetite, energy balance, or body weight.
Some data suggests that sweeteners 'may be used in a structured diet to replace sources of added sugars and that this substitution may result in modest energy intake reductions and weight loss'.
Non-caloric sweeteners, when used judiciously, 'could facilitate reductions in added sugars intake, thereby resulting in decreased total energy and weight loss/weight control, and promoting beneficial effects on related metabolic parameters. However, these potential benefits will not be fully realized if there is a compensatory increase in energy intake from other sources'.
Non-nutritive sweeteners, when substituting nutritive sweeteners, may help limit carbohydrate and energy intake as a strategy to manage blood glucose or weight.
Consumers who want a sweet taste without added energy can use non-nutritive sweeteners based on their personal taste preference and intended use.
Effect of sweeteners intake on dental health
'the consumption of foods/drinks containing xylitol, sorbitol, mannitol, maltitol, lactitol, isomalt, erythritol […] instead of sugar in sugar-containing foods/drinks, may maintain tooth mineralisation compared with sugar-containing foods, provided that such foods/drinks do not lead to dental erosion'. This scientific substantiation also applies to intense sweeteners.
moderate evidence of a beneficial effect of polyols on dental caries. Use of chewing gum containing polyols, compared to not using a chewing gum, is beneficial to oral health (mixed and permanent dentition).
insufficient/inconsistent evidence from RCTs on effects of polyols on caries of deciduous dentition, or of confectionary containing polyols on caries in mixed and permanent dentition.
Effect of sweeteners intake on appetite
not possible to determine the effect of regular intense sweetener consumption on sweetness habituation or increased cravings for sweetened products.
occasional consumption of intense sweeteners before or during a meal 'has no effect on food intake or energy intake during the next meal'.
Occasional intense sweetener consumption before a meal 'reduces the sensation of hunger and the desire to eat, just like caloric sweeteners, but this effect is temporary and disappears before the start of the meal'.
for habituation to sweetness, intense sweetener consumption 'has not shown any effects in adults'. However, in children, there are no data that demonstrate whether intense sweeteners have an effect on taste development, food preferences or the control of food intake.
Effect of sweeteners intake on gastrointestinal health
Limited evidence that consumption of some polyols increases faecal weight, mass and affects faecal bacterial content (e.g.
Bifidobacterium spp.). The health impact of an effect on faecal bacteria is currently uncertain, thus, whether this observation is beneficial or biologically relevant cannot be determined. No effects on faecal pH, faecal short chain fatty acids, based on limited evidence. insufficient/inconsistent evidence on effects of polyols on intestinal transit time and constipation
Other effects of sweeteners intake on health
Lack of convincing scientific information to encourage systematic replacement of sugars with intense sweeteners in sweet products, in a public health policy framework.
Artificial sweetened beverages and sugar sweetened beverages should not be consumed as substitutes for water.
'Because of the lack of research in children, a recommendation either for or against the routine use of NNSs in the diets of children cannot be made at this time'.
no official recommendations regarding the use of non-caloric sweeteners, due to limited studies in children
In nutrition standards for beverages for schools, sweeteners should only be allowed in high schools and only after the school day has ended (due to displacing milk and 100% fruit juice during meals).
For foods, no recommendations made regarding non-nutritive sweeteners, due to limited amount of consistent evidence.
Back to top Back to paragraph
Seeing the potential health implications of sugars consumption, major nutrition and health-related organisations have issued nutritional recommendations on limiting sugars and sugar containing foods and beverages (Table 6). Most refer to added or free sugars intake and target specifically sugar-rich products such as SSBs. Some recommendations set an upper limit of daily energy (calorie) intake of (added/free) sugars, which is in most cases 10% and sometimes 5% of the total daily energy intake (E%). Similarly, food based dietary guidelines generally recommend limiting sugars and sweetened products.
Table 6: Dietary recommendations for sugars intake as described by food- and health-related organisations
Available evidence not sufficient to set an upper limit for intake of added sugars.
Nevertheless, evidence of effects on weight gain, dental caries and micronutrient intake should be considered when establishing nutrient goals for populations, recommendations for individuals and food-based dietary guidelines.
Reduce intake of free sugars throughout life (strong recommendation)
. g For adults and children, reduce intake of free sugars to less than 10% of total energy intake (strong recommendation).
Suggestion for further reduction to less than 5% of total energy intake (conditional recommendation)
'Intakes of free sugars should be reduced and minimised with a desirable upper limit of <5% energy intake in children and adolescents aged ≥ 2–18 years. [...] Intakes should be even lower in infants and toddlers <2 years'.
'Smoothies and sweetened milk drinks/products (ie, milk products containing a higher concentration of sugars than unprocessed human, cow or goat milk, such as chocolate milks, condensed milks, fruit yoghurts) […] are an important source of free sugars and their intake should be limited'.
'Sugar-containing beverages and foods (SSBs, fruit juices, fruit based smoothies and sweetened milk drinks/products) should be replaced by water or, in the latter case, with unsweetened milk drinks/products with lactose up to the amount naturally present in milk and unsweetened milk products'.
'a recommendation focusing only on intakes of 'added' sugars is not justified…the available data cannot be used to distinguish the health effects of sugars naturally present in food from those of added sugars'.
'there is a range of evidence converging towards the harmful effects of high sugar intakes which makes it necessary to issue recommendations limiting sugar intakes in the population. The data currently available cannot be used to precisely establish the threshold of total sugars from which these effects appear.
It is however, necessary to propose an upper limit: 'of 100 g/day for total consumption of sugars, excluding lactose and galactose. This limit applies to the general healthy adult population, and to total sugars, whether they are naturally present in food or added during food manufacture or preparation.
'this value represents an upper intake limit not to be exceeded, and not an intake recommendation'
'It is recommended that the average population intake of free sugars should not exceed 5% of total dietary energy for age groups from 2 years upwards'
'It is recommended that the consumption of sugars-sweetened beverages should be minimised in children and adults'.
Limiting SSBs consumption will contribute to increased micronutrient density and reduced intake of added sugars. Added sugars should be kept below 10 E%.
DGE 2012, DGE 2013
'the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages should be limited, because they increase the risk of obesity and diabetes'.
'Only rarely drink sugar sweetened beverages. They are high in energy, therefore an increased intake can promote overweight'.
People with or at risk of diabetes should avoid SSBs to control weight and reduce risk and reduce consumption of sucrose-containing foods that can displace healthier, more nutrient dense foods.
For young children (< 2 yrs. of age), 'because there is minimal room for nutrient-free calories in the habitual diets', added sugars should be avoided.
Recommendations for children and adolescents: reduce the intake of added sugars, including sugar sweetened beverages, juices and foods. It is recommended that children and adolescents limit intake of SSBs to 1 or fewer 8-oz (approx. 237 ml) beverages per week. It is also reasonable to recommend that children and adolescents consume less than 25 g (100 cal or approx. 6 teaspoons) of added sugars per day.
American women and men should not drink or eat more than 100 and 150 calories per day respectively from added sugars (6 and 9 teaspoons respectively).
Low- and no calorie beverages e.g. water, diet soft drinks, and fat- free or low-fat milk are better choices than full-calorie soft drinks.
Limit consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages; eliminate all type of sweetened drinks in schools.
Maximise nutrient density within recommended calorie ranges; strike a balance between reducing excess calories, solid fats, added sugar and sodium, using available calories to encourage intake of nutrient rich foods and beverages.
Limit added sugars to a maximum of 10% of total dietary caloric intake.
Fitch C. & Keim K.S. 2012
Consumers should limit added sugars to help achieve/ maintain a healthy weight.
Food-Based Dietary Guidelines in Europe
Food based dietary guidelines from several EU countries recommend less than 10% of daily energy intake should come from sugar.
Guidelines recommend limiting sugar consumption from foods and beverages; several recommend to prefer low-sugar or sugar-free alternatives.
WHO FBDG webpage
Food based dietary guidelines from several of the WHO European Region countries recommend limiting sugar consumption from foods and beverages; several recommend choosing low-sugar or sugaring free alternatives.
the proposed limit is based on fructose content of sugars; see reference for a detailed explanation on how this was calculated a
Under EU law, sweeteners are food additives, and therefore their intake is considered under the scope of Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) values. EFSA, and before that the Scientific Committee on Food, has set EU ADI values for both intense sweeteners and polyols, reported in Table 7.
Table 7: Acceptable daily intake (ADI) of sweeteners in the EU
Back to top Back to paragraph
In the EU, EFSA reported
(EFSA 2010a) compiled data on carbohydrate intakes, drawn from national food consumption surveys, conducted from 1994 onwards, as well as from data in the ENHR report of 2009 (ENHR 2009). Due to differences in the methodology used to assess individual intakes and the different time points analysed, EFSA notes that the quality and quantity of data varies making direct comparisons difficult.
In the dataset compiled by EFSA, most countries did not report intakes of mono- or disaccharides separately. In the few countries that did
, average intakes of mono- and disaccharides varied from 23 to 36 E% in children and adolescents, and from 17 to 26 E% in adults. Additionally, some countries specifically reported i average sucrose intakes, which varied between 6 and 14 %E in adults. Average intakes below 11 E% were only observed in the age categories of 35-64 y (94% of the group) and over 65 y (79% of the group). As EFSA noted, added sugars intake in some EU MS exceeded the 10 E% threshold recommended by WHO as well as national EU authorities, especially in children. j
Data from other surveys on sugar intake can be found in Table 8; as before, due to differences in methodology, year of study, age groups involved, and measurement taken (e.g. total sugars or added sugars) it is difficult to draw any conclusions on the intake of added sugars across the EU.
Table 8: Overview of sugars intake across European countries (EU and Norway)
Intakes represent total intake from all sources, except where otherwise stated
. Reported intake is based on publicly available data compiled by Prof. I. Elmadfa and Dr. Alexa Meyer (University of Vienna), unless referenced otherwise. Data may not be comparable due to differences in methodology, year of study, age groups involved, and measurement taken.
Total sugars intake (E%± SD)
- Belgian National Food Consumption Survey 2014-2015 (2x24h recall & Food Frequency Questionnaire)
Age group (years)
- Danskernes kostvaner 2011-2013 (7d food record)
Age group (years)
9 ± 3.7
9 ± 4.0
11 ± 4.6
10 ± 4.4
12 ± 4.6
11 ± 4.8
11 ± 5.4
11 ± 5.2
10 ± 6.5
11 ± 6.9
10 ± 5.7
9 ± 4.8
9 ± 5.7
9 ± 5.3
7 ± 4.9
8 ± 5.0
7 ± 4.7
7 ± 3.6
8 ± 4.9
8 ± 4.1
- National Adult Nutrition Survey 2008-2010 (4d weighed food record)
Age group (years)
15.8 ± 5.4
17.7 ± 5.8
15.5 ± 5.9
16.9 ± 5.1
15.9 ± 6.0
18.3 ± 6.0
16.5 ± 6.8
19.1 ± 5.1
Age group (years)
France d -
Etude individuelle Nationale sur les Consommations Alimentaires (INCA) III 2014-2015 (24 h recall)
Age group (years)
- INRAN-SCAI 2005-2006 (3d food record)
Age group (years)
17.0 ± 5.0
15.4 ± 4.7
15.8 ± 5.2
13.5 ± 4.7
15.4 ± 5.1
13.3 ± 5.0
16.1 ± 5.4
- National Dietary Survey by the Hungarian Food Safety Office (HFSO) 2009 (3 d food record)
Age group (years)
8.4 ± 5.1
8.9 ± 4.4
6.6 ± 4.2
8.1 ± 4.2
6.4 ± 3.7
8.0 ± 4.2
Austria - Austrian Study on Nutritional Status (ASNS) 2012 (2x24h recall)
Age group (years)
21.8 ± 6.2
22.8 ± 5.6
11.6 ± 4.7
11.4 ± 3.3
21.2 ± 5.7
20.2 ± 5.9
10.4 ± 3.8
10.6 ± 5.0
20.6 ± 5.9
19.4 ± 5.9
10.0 ± 3.8
10.6 ± 4.0
19.0 ± 6.7
20.3 ± 6.2
9.7 ± 4.1
9.1 ± 3.8
19.3 ± 7.2
20.1 ± 6.7
10.1 ± 5.1
10.1 ± 4.5
15.6 ± 7.0
20.3 ± 6.5
7.6 ± 4.8
10.4 ± 3.7
16.7 ± 6.2
17.9 ± 6.7
8.0 ± 4.0
8.8 ± 4.3
Finland - National FINDIET 2012 Survey 2012 (48h recall)
9.2 ± 5.4
10.0 ± 5.5
8.9 ± 4.9
- National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity survey (IAN-AF) 2015-2016 (2x24h recall)
- Riksmaten adults 2010-2011 (4d food record)
9.8 ± 5.1
12.0 ± 4.9
7.6 ± 4.5
9.7 ± 4.1
9.5 ± 4.4
9.8 ± 5.0
7.1 ± 3.5
8.1 ± 3.8
9.1 ± 4.4
8.7 ± 4.2
7.1 ± 3.5
7.4 ± 3.5
9.2 ± 4.2
9.5 ± 4.4
7.1 ± 3.1
8.1 ± 3.4
- National Diet and Nutrition Survey 2008-2010 (4d food record)
Mono / Disaccharides
14.4 ± 5.2
e 14.7 ± 4.8
15.4 ± 5.9
14.9 ± 6.3
11.9 ± 6.0
11.3 ± 6.3
11.2 ± 6.0
10.9 ± 4.9
- Norkost 3 2010-2011 (2x24h recall)
Mono / Disaccharides
9.2 ± 6.9
9.3 ± 6.5
7.2 ± 6.0
8.2 ± 5.6
7.7 ± 6.0
6.6 ± 4.4
6.3 ± 5.1
6.8 ± 4.9
6.3 ± 4.4
6.5 ± 4.2
added sugars, a b non-milk total sugars, free sugars, c simple sugars from sweetened foods, no SD given, d soluble carbohydrates, e simple sugars, food used for diaries for children<10 yr, f non-milk extrinsic sugars g
Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI) values have been already discussed in section 3.5 of the present Brief. In most cases, and as indicated in the relevant safety evaluations, even with high consumption scenarios, sweetener intake levels are expected to remain below the ADI threshold
(ANSES 2015) . 
Back to top Back to paragraph
As described in Table 4, high intake of added sugars can be a risk factor for ill health, especially in the case of intake of sugar sweetened beverages. For example, the Global Burden of Disease 2017
(GBD study 2017) study estimated that diets high in SSBs, defined as consumption of any beverage with more than 50 calories from sugar per a serving of one cup , and including carbonated beverages, sodas, energy drinks, fruit drinks but excluding 100% fruit and vegetable juices, resulted in almost 21000 avoidable deaths in 2017 in the EU, as well as in more than 529,000 Disability Adjusted Life years (DALYs – sum of years lost due to premature death and years lived with disability). l (GBD results tool). Back to top Back to paragraph
A number of scientific associations, institutions and authorities have issued policy recommendations that ultimately aim to reduce intake of sugars, with a special focus on recommendations for children. These policy recommendations can be generally categorised in actions that i) tackle provision of information to the consumers, e.g. labelling of sugar content in foods, restrictions of marketing practices for foods high in sugars content, encouraging healthy behaviours such as drinking water, ii) making the healthy option available by improving the 'food environment', e.g. offering freely available water and limiting the availability of foods and beverages high in sugars content in schools or public environments, reformulating processed foods to reduce sugars content, and iii) implementing financial (dis)incentives such as taxes on products with high sugars content to dissuade consumers from purchasing or consuming them. A summary of such policy recommendations can be found in Table 9.
Table 9: Examples of policy recommendations to address sugars intake
Restrict or eliminate choice a
Introduce standards for kindergarten and school meals which include limits on free sugars.
'given the limited effectiveness of charters on voluntary decreases, consider the establishment of regulatory measures targeting the main vectors of added sugars'.
'limit the availability of sweetened products in automatic vending machines and in particular in all places of education and teaching (primary and secondary schools, higher education facilities, universities, etc.)'.
Ban on selling SSB and high sugar foods in schools, restriction policies for workplaces.
'Legislation on composition of foods to reduce energy density, salt and saturated fat, and (added) sugar content of foods and beverages, and to limit portion sizes is recommended'.
Limit access to SSBs.
Policies to […] reduce SSBs in post-secondary institutions and worksites to target young adults.
Guide choice through (dis)incentives a
Develop measures to reduce intake of free sugars through various public health interventions such as fiscal policies targeting foods and beverages high in free sugar.
'There is reasonable and increasing evidence that appropriately designed taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages would result in proportional reductions in consumption, especially if aimed at raising the retail price by 20% or more'.
Introduce 'fiscal measures such as taxation for SSBs and sugar-rich foods and/or incentivising the purchase of healthy food'.
Government financial incentives including taxes to reduce consumption of SSBs and high sugar foods and promote replacement by F&V.
'Taxes on foods and beverages rich in sugar and saturated fat, and on alcoholic drinks are recommended'.
Introduce a price increase of a 10-20% minimum on high sugar products (e.g. tax or levy on SSBs).
Fiscal approaches, using incentives and disincentives should be explored – higher SSB taxes may encourage consumers to reduce consumptions.
Tax revenues could be used to subsidize fruits and vegetables or nutrition and health promotion efforts.
'Decrease the relative cost of more healthful beverage alternatives through differential pricing of SSBs'.
Enable or guide choice through changing defaults a
'Develop policy measures that engage food retailers and caterers to improve the availability, affordability and acceptability of healthier food products […] with reduced content of […] free sugars'.
Reformulate processed foods high in sugar.
'take measures to limit the incentive to consume sweet products (visual, audio-visual or audio advertising, free distributions, etc.)'.
Make clean drinking water freely available in schools, workplaces, public open spaces.
Increase availability and affordability of fresh vegetables, fresh fruit and drinking water.
Establish a regulatory framework for reformulation of processed foods to reduce sugar content.
Ban advertising of SSBs and foods high in sugar to children and adolescents and sponsorship of sporting events by SSB or high sugar content food manufacturers.
'Legislation restricting marketing aimed at children of foods that are high in fats, sugar and/or salt, less healthy options, junk foods, drinks with alcohol and non-alcoholic beverages rich in sugar (e.g. on TV, internet, social media and on food packages) is recommended'.
Reduce number and type of price promotions of sugary products in retail outlets and out of home services sector.
Introduce a program of gradual portion size and sugar content reduction.
Reduce marketing and advertising of high sugar foods and drinks to children and adults across all media.
Free, readily available water should be available in public settings, worksites, children gathering locations etc.
Reduce added sugars in foods and SSBs in school meals.
Introduce policies to limit exposure and marketing of foods and beverages high in added sugars in youth.
Change policies to encourage purchase of healthier products, low in added sugars, for nutrition assistance and supplementation programmes.
Ensure access to drinking water.
Promote access and consumption of healthful alternatives to SSBs.
Limit marketing of SSBs and minimise its impact in children.
Provide information a
Develop measures to reduce intake of free sugars through various public health interventions such as labelling, consumer education,
WHO proposes nutrient profile criteria for restricting marketing of foods to children, establishing limits (g/100 g), per food category for total and added sugars; if these limits are exceeded in a food product, its marketing to children should not be permitted.
Include information on
free sugars on the nutrition information of food labelling, expressed both in grams and as % daily energy intake. A more practical way might be to add number of teaspoons of total sugars and free sugars on front-of-pack labels. 'However, further research testing consumer preferences and understanding is required'.
'raise the awareness of the population about the health effects of sugars, from a very early age, through information campaigns; the emphasis should be on nutritional education provided in schools; children should learn to identify the products that are vectors of sugars and to limit them as part of a varied diet'.
'make it mandatory to provide composition data on added sugars in manufactured products'.
Introduction of clear, colour-coded front of pack labelling giving total sugar content (including all types of sugars).
Revise healthy eating guidelines to reduce consumption of foods with naturally high sugar (e.g. dried fruit, fruit juices).
Public health campaigns to educate people about the health risks of excess sugar intake.
Set a clear definition of high sugar foods – review and strength the Ofcom nutrient profile model.
Encourage consumers to drink water, a healthy, low-cost, zero-calorie beverage. Public education campaigns to help consumers reduce added sugars and SSBs.
Nutrition Facts Panel should include added sugars (grams and teaspoons) and include a percent daily value to assist consumers in making informed decision.
Introduce standardised, easily understood front-of-pack labels, including calories, added sugars, saturated fats & sodium.
Include counselling regarding risks of SSB consumption as part of routine medical and dental care visits. Expand knowledge and skills of medical care providers to conduct counselling on SSBs.
Assess current intake of free sugars.
Based on the Nuffield intervention ladder as described in a Public Health: ethical issues from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics Nov 2007
Back to top Back to paragraph
The aim of this paragraph is to present examples of policies that are already in place to address sugars overconsumption. Similar to policy recommendations, most of these can be broadly categorised in policies that aim to provide information, make the healthy option available, or provide financial (dis)incentives to sugar consumption. Governments around the world have adopted different measures to reduce sugar consumption (Table 10), from the introduction of 'sugar taxes', to voluntary actions involving co-operation with relevant stakeholders, e.g. the voluntary reformulation pledges of the members of the EU Platform for Action on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. As in Table 10, many of the implemented policies target consumption of SSBs and limit the availability of sugary foods and beverages in schools.
There are few actions in place specific for sweeteners; most of these tackle the use of intense sweeteners in SSBs in school environments and are summarised in Table 11.