Why the Commission evaluates
The Commission evaluates if specific laws, policies and spending activities are fit for purpose and have delivered, at minimum cost, the desired changes to European business and citizens.
The evaluation findings help the Commission to decide whether EU actions should be continued or changed.
Evaluation or fitness check
An evaluation assesses a specific EU law, policy or funding programme for:
- effectiveness (whether the EU action reached its objectives)
- efficiency (what are the costs and benefits)
- relevance (whether it responds to stakeholders' needs)
- coherence (how well it works with other actions)
- EU added value (what are the benefits of acting at EU level)
A fitness check is a type of evaluation that assesses several related actions. It focuses on identifying how different laws, policies and programmes interact, any inconsistencies or synergies, and their collective impact.
These are communicated to the public via evaluation roadmaps, and are planned on a multi-annual basis.
How to contribute
Anyone can provide feedback on plans for evaluations and fitness checks and participate in public consultations on ongoing evaluations.
The better regulation guidelines and accompanying toolbox (2015) provide common standards for quality when the Commission evaluates the performance of its actions.
The Regulatory Scrutiny Board examines and issues opinions on the quality of major evaluations and fitness checks.
The main findings of evaluations are summarised in staff working documents, which are published on EUR-Lex.
Other evaluations can be found in the EU bookshop. These include evaluation reports prepared for the Commission by external contractors and reports evaluating programmes and policies internally.