About this initiative

Full title

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL Amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Banking Authority); Regulation (EU) No 1094/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority); Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority); Regulation (EU) No 345/2013 on European venture capital funds; Regulation (EU) No 346/2013 on European social entrepreneurship funds; Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 on markets in financial instruments; Regulation (EU) 2015/760 on European long-term investment funds; Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds; and Regulation (EU) 2017/1129 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading on a regulated market

Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
Download (2.4 MB - PDF - 283 pages)
Download (1.9 MB - PDF - 184 pages)
Download (263 KB - PDF - 3 pages)

Subscribe to receive notifications

Get notified by e-mail when new initiatives are added.
If you already have an account please log in.
Otherwise create an account using the Register button below.

Give your feedback

Feedback period
20 September 2017 - 16 December 2017
Feedback status: Open

The Commission would like to hear your views.

Once the Commission has decided on a legislative proposal and put it forward for adoption by the EU Parliament and Council, you can respond to the proposal and accompanying impact assessment. The feedback period will close 8 weeks after the proposal is made available in all EU languages. You can choose between having your feedback:

  • published with your personal details or organisation's details, or
  • published anonymously (make sure attachments don't contain any personal details)
Once submitted, your feedback will be immediately published on this site. We'll review published feedback to check it complies with the rules for feedback and suggestions. If it doesn't, it will be removed. You will not receive an individual response, but the Commission will present a summary of the feedback received to the Parliament and Council so that your views can be part of the legislative debate.

Give feedback

Recent feedback

  • Anonymous (United Kingdom)
    10 October 2017 EU citizen

    Anonymous (United Kingdom)

    It is very disappointing that the Commission has not listened to the feedback from the consultation. I hope that the Council and Parliament will take note. "... many respondents object to significantly increasing ESAs' powers at this stage...", but this feedback is ignored. "A clear majority do not support revising the current funding framework replacing contributions from national competent authority (sic) by contributions from the industry....

  • Bundesverband Alternative Investments e.V. (BAI) (Germany)
    6 October 2017 Business association

    Bundesverband Alternative Investments e.V. (BAI) (Germany)

    BAI, the cross-asset and cross-product advocacy association for the Alternative Investments industry in Germany, supports this project in principle, but calls for careful evaluation and restrained reforms. We are quite critical with regard to the expansion of competencies at European level and the direct funding of the ESAs by the financial industry. The fact that the EU Commission evaluates the quality and efficiency of the work of the...

  • Julia HOLLOWAY (United Kingdom)
    25 September 2017 EU citizen

    Julia HOLLOWAY (United Kingdom)

    The greatest problem facing the EU is the sense among people at the bottom that it is only for a self-serving elite, with a bureaucracy that blocks instead of provides. This gives rise to anger, expressed with racism. The greatest need in Europe and in England is for families to be able to survive and to have housing, instead of unemployed youth in despair. Why not at this critical time forge ahead with housing for citizens and migrants...

All feedback (3) >