The growing European demand of biofuel crops increase the need of agricultural land, converting valuable habitats and displacing other crops, with serious impacts on food security and significant greenhouse gas emissions from land use change as a result.
Sweden and Finland promote their commercial forestry as sustainable and export it as a good example to producer countries in the tropics which lead to forest degradation. The Swedish and Finnish forest industries are, among others, strong lobbyists and use the climate as a pretext to increase their forest harvest, production and economic rates. By endorsing a so called bioeconomy, natural forests are systematically clear-cut and replaced by even-aged tree plantations, poor of species, to acquire alleged sustainable wood products and bioenergy.
The European Commission must:
• Stop the global destruction and felling of primary and natural forests. Protect the remaining peatland forests, old-growth forests and other high conservation value forests (HCVFs).
• Develop a strong legislation to ensure that imported agricultural and forest commodities to the EU are produced without causing deforestation and violating indigenous peoples’ rights.
• Immediately impose trade sanctions on any commodity being produced in areas where indigenous groups and territories are under threat from increased deforestation and genocide. Brazil is at the moment a high-risk country. Boycott products from conflict areas, such as soy from the mid-eastern part of Brazil.
• Immediately stop subsidizing forest and farming activities that contribute to deforestation and the cutting of natural forest. Restrict the trade of meat, soy and palm oil.
• Ban the import and use of palm oil, palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD) and soy oil in transport fuels in the EU.
• Introduce a tax on commodities based on their ecological footprint.
• Monitor and report deforestation and control where imported commodities originate from. A regulation with mandatory due diligence requirements is required as well as transparency to fully trace the supply chain.
• Impose a law establishing ECOCIDE as an international crime prohibiting dangerous industrial activities and destruction of ecosystems.
• Initiate a fund to help finance the protection of high conservation value forests where the rights of indigenous people are respected and the biodiversity is safeguarded. These forests should not managed be managed at all (not even ‘sustainably’) and the payment should not be a part REDD+ where the emissions from logged forest areas can be compensated by planting industrial tree plantations elsewhere.
• Specify definitions and clear terms for so called ‘sustainable’ forestry and agricultural practices, which consider socio-ecological economics and policies that operate within the planetary boundaries. Today, arbitrary and vague definitions of the word ‘sustainable’ mislead and promote clear-cutting practices and increased expansion of tree plantations, which harm the biodiversity, offset greenhouse gases, and damage soil and water resources.
• Impose sanctions on EU companies that conduct industrial-scale commercial logging operations in HCVFs and establish monoculture tree plantations.
• Support the creation and implementation of the 200 million hectare Andes-Amazon-Atlantic Corridor to safeguard biodiversity and people, proposed by Amazonian indigenous leaders at the CBD COP14 in Egypt 2018.
• Promote forest restoration by favoring natural regeneration & natural forests, not monocultures.
• Support the use of nature-oriented & continuous cover forestry in forest areas without HCV.
• Introduce a policy to to reduce Europe’s overconsumption of meat & dairy products, which drives deforestation.
• Reduce waste in food production & distribution.
• Introduce incentives to reduce the consumption of paper, forest products & other natural resources.Reduce energy consumption & use, promote energy efficiency & recycling.
The views and opinions expressed here are entirely those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The Commission cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information contained in them. Neither the Commission, nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf, may be held responsible for the content or the information posted here. Views and opinions that violate the Commission’s feedback rules will be removed from the site.