About this initiative

Reference
Ares(2018)2604213
Type
Full title

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) …/… establishing a monitoring methodology and the arrangements for reporting by Member States in accordance with Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies

Department
Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology
Committee
Download (170.8 KB - PDF - 6 pages)
Download (121.8 KB - PDF - 5 pages)
Download (115.5 KB - PDF - 3 pages)

Give your feedback

Feedback period
18 May 2018 - 15 June 2018
Feedback status: Closed

The Commission would like to hear your views.

All feedback

Subscribe to receive notifications

Get notified by e-mail when new initiatives are added.
If you already have an account please log in.
Otherwise create an account using the Register button below.

Recent feedback

  • Daniela Di Gianantonio (Italy)
    15 June 2018 EU citizen
    Daniela Di Gianantonio (Italy)

    Annex I 1.2.5 Suggested revision for mainly two reasons. First of all, the monitoring body has to monitor by definition, meaning that has to check whether a website is accessible or not, independently from the evaluations made by a third party. If a third party evaluation is accepted, the role of the monitoring body would be diminished. Secondly, 3 years is too long period – a website/mobile app changes significantly in a 3-year time period....

  • Eye Association of the Netherlands (Oogvereniging Nederland) (Netherlands)
    15 June 2018 Non-governmental organisation (NGO)
    Eye Association of the Netherlands (Oogvereniging Nederland) (Netherlands)

    The proposed methodology for monitoring tends to put too much emphasis on measuring accessibility at a technical level, to the detriment of usability and user experience. For that same reason, we disagree with promoting automated testing, Re. point 2.2.4: we are keen for persons with disabilities to be more involved (according to the CRPD) and we would like their representative organizations to be consulted for the selection of a higher...

  • Funka Nu AB (Sweden)
    15 June 2018 Company/business organisation
    Funka Nu AB (Sweden)

    The overall approach of this proposal is good. The combination of qualitative and quantitative testing mirrors the recommendations from the SMART 2014/0061 research study as well as the recommendations of the WADex SubGroup which means it is based on empirical research as well as input from a variety of stakeholders including end user organisations (DPOs). Some parts of the proposal is of great importance and very positive, such as: 1.2.2-1.2...

  • Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation (Norway)
    15 June 2018 Public authority
    Ministry of Local Government and Modernisation (Norway)

    Please find attached Norways comments on the draft implementing acts.

  • ANACOM (Portugal)
    15 June 2018 Public authority
    ANACOM (Portugal)

    Comentários à proposta de modelo de declaração de acessibilidade: - A declaração de acessibilidade pode incluir uma seção de conteúdo opcional onde pode constar, por exemplo, o link para o relatório de avaliação, uma explicação detalhada do empenho do organismo do EM em obter uma conformidade mais elevada no futuro, as medidas de compensação implementadas para suportar o acesso a cidadãos com necessidades especiais a conteúdos não acessíveis,...

  • European Disability Forum (Belgium)
    15 June 2018 Non-governmental organisation (NGO)
    European Disability Forum (Belgium)

    On behalf of the European Disability Forum, please see Part 1 of the document attached.

All feedback (20) >