About this initiative

Topic
Banking and financial services
Type of act
Report

Roadmap

Feedback: closed
Type

Inception impact assessment
More about roadmaps.

Feedback period
24 July 2017 - 21 August 2017
View feedback received >
Download (282.7 KB - PDF - 4 pages)

Feedback (21)

  • FOCIS (United Kingdom)
    21 August 2017 Other
    FOCIS (United Kingdom)

    Dear Sirs Motor Insurance Directive Please find attached a response by the Forum of Complex Injury Solicitors (FOCIS), which supports retaining a wider interpretation of the Motor Insurance Directive as currently prevails following Vnuk. We also advocate ensuring Guarantee Funds cover the scenario of insolvent insurers and that the unlimited levels of motor insurance that have long-prevailed in the UK become an EC-wide requirement. If you have...

  • French Insurance Federation (FFA) (France)
    21 August 2017 Business association
    French Insurance Federation (FFA) (France)

    Dear Sir / Madam, Please find attached the feedback of the French Insurance Federation (FFA) on the Inception Impact Assessment on the REFIT review of the MID. We remain at your disposal for any further information. Yours sincerely, Stéphane de Maupeou Head of the European Office

  • Rowan Public Affairs (United Kingdom)
    21 August 2017 Company/business organisation
    Rowan Public Affairs (United Kingdom)

    We represent the Motor Cycle Industry Association of Great Britain, the Auto Cycle Union of Great Britain and the Amateur Motor Cycle Association, three bodies with keen interests in motorcycle sport in the UK and beyond. Please see their attached response.

All feedback (21) >

Commission adoption

Feedback: closed
Type

Proposal for a directive
More about adopted acts

Adopted on
24 May 2018
Feedback period
24 May 2018 - 24 July 2018
View feedback received >
Download (452.9 KB - PDF - 21 pages)
Download (208.2 KB - PDF - 3 pages)
Download (3.8 MB - PDF - 159 pages)
Download (398.2 KB - PDF - 8 pages)

Feedback (530)

  • Arjen Veninga (Netherlands)
    24 July 2018 EU citizen
    Arjen Veninga (Netherlands)

    I am replying as an employee of Specialized Europe B.V.: I am very much against the inclusion of Electrically Power Assisted Cycles (EPACs) within the revision of the Motor Insurance Directive because of the following reasons: Jobs and investments at risk EPACs are a key part of the cycle industry's future employment growth potential. Current EPAC sales show that in the European Union, millions of EPACs are sold every year and sales are...

  • Pavel Szukala (Czech Republic)
    24 July 2018 EU citizen
    Pavel Szukala (Czech Republic)

    I am replying as an employee Specialzed Europe B.V.,Czech Branch: I am very much against the inclusion of Electrically Power Assisted Cycles (EPACs) within the revision of the Motor Insurance Directive because of the following reasons: Jobs and investments at risk EPACs are a key part of the cycle industry's future employment growth potential. Current EPAC sales show that in the European Union, millions of EPACs are sold every year and sales...

  • SPÉCIALIZED (France)
    24 juillet 2018 Company/business organisation
    SPÉCIALIZED (France)

    En tant qu'employé de SPECIALIZED Europe B.V., je suis très opposé à l'inclusion des Vélos à Assistance Electrique (EPAC) dans la révision de la directive sur l'assurance automobile pour les raisons suivantes. Emplois et investissements à risque Les EPAC constituent une véritable clé de croissance de l'emploi de l'industrie du cycle. Les ventes actuelles d'EPAC montrent que, dans l'Union européenne, des millions d'EPAC sont vendus chaque année...

All feedback (530) >

Subscribe to receive notifications

Be notified by email when new initiatives are added on topics you're interested in or follow developments to individual initiatives.
You won't receive more than 1 email per day and you can manage your subscription preferences whenever you like.
Simply create an account using the Register button below.