Feedback reference
F1993
Submitted by
Karl DOWNEY
User type
Business association
Organisation
CEMBUREAU, European Cement Association
Organisation size
Small (10 to 49 employees)
Transparency register number
Country of origin
Belgium

CEMBUREAU, the European Cement Association, recommends Option I (No legislative change), and strongly recommends against Option III (Repealing the CPR).

In general, we are not in favour of a premature revision of the CPR. Where we recognise that there are issues to be solved in the pragmatic implementation of the Regulation, this does not mean we are advocating a revision of the Regulation. Indeed, a long revision process is unlikely to solve the issues which are less caused by the Regulation itself, and have more to do with implementation.

Therefore, under Option I, we support the idea mentioned that “Efforts would be made - i.a. through flexible and uniform interpretation - to smoothen its application, promote the uptake of simplification provisions…”. We call for improving the process of reviewing mandates and amending standards. For that purpose, more resources should be dedicated to processing delegated acts that are relevant to standards and assessing and citing published standards in the OJ.

The views and opinions expressed here are entirely those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The Commission cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information contained in them. Neither the Commission, nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf, may be held responsible for the content or the information posted here. Views and opinions that violate the Commission’s feedback rules will be removed from the site.