About this initiative

Reference
Ares(2016)5832764
Type
Full title

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) …/... supplementing Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 on the European Union trade mark and repealing Commission Regulations (EC) No 2868/95 and (EC) No 216/96

Department
Directorate-General for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs
Expert group
Download (615.6 KB - PDF - 50 pages)

Give your feedback

Feedback period
10 October 2016 - 7 November 2016
Feedback status: Closed

The Commission would like to hear your views.

All feedback

Subscribe to receive notifications

Get notified by e-mail when new initiatives are added.
If you already have an account please log in.
Otherwise create an account using the Register button below.

Recent feedback

  • International Trademark Association (Belgium)
    7 November 2016 Other
    International Trademark Association (Belgium)

    The International Trademark Association (INTA) welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Draft Commission Delegated Regulation. Our complete comments are available on request at hnicora@inta.org. We believe that some provisions in the Draft text should be clarified or added in order to simplify procedures and increase legal certainty for trademark users. Below are a few examples of our comments which serve these objectives: (A)...

  • ITMA and CITMA (Joint submission) (United Kingdom)
    7 November 2016 Non-governmental organisation (NGO)
    ITMA and CITMA (Joint submission) (United Kingdom)

    (Part 2 of 2) • Article 39(1) – We suggest that "a reasonable time limit" be more clearly defined, e.g. by wording such as "a reasonable time limited, being no longer that six months from the date of submission,…". • Article 53 – We suggest that information to assist in identifying the case should be required contents of the minutes of oral proceedings. At a minimum an identifying number should be required, e.g. the opposition or appeal...

  • ITMA and CITMA (Joint submission) (United Kingdom)
    7 November 2016 Non-governmental organisation (NGO)
    ITMA and CITMA (Joint submission) (United Kingdom)

    (Part 1 of 2) ITMA and CITMA thank the Commission for the opportunity to respond to the consultation and make the following comments: Explanatory Memorandum • Paragraph 3.3 - We suggest the change of “examiners” to “examination” to match to the terminology for the other divisions mentioned. • Paragraph 3.3 - We suggest the change of “Lastly” to “Last” to match the terminology for the preceding paragraphs, the other alternative would be to...

  • APRAM (France)
    7 November 2016 Business association
    APRAM (France)

    In the name of APRAM (“Association des Praticiens du droit des Marques et des modèles »), an association of trademark practitioners, which comprises around 1000 members consisting of trademark attorneys, litigators and industry in-house lawyers, we would like to make the following comments: We would like to draw your attention to the fact that it usually requires a significant turnaround time to consult our members, collect their replies and...

  • ECTA, The European Communities Trade Mark Association (Belgium)
    7 November 2016 Non-governmental organisation (NGO)
    ECTA, The European Communities Trade Mark Association (Belgium)

    -General remarks: (i) deadlines: ECTA proposes to streamline all deadlines for any purpose to two months to remove any unfairness to the parties; (ii) ECTA would like to maintain the term rule for the Secondary legislation instead of article. -Art 7: Where the evidence is accessible online from an official source recognised by the Office, the opposing party may provide such evidence by making reference to that official source. In such a case,...

  • Anonymous (United Kingdom)
    7 November 2016 Other
    Anonymous (United Kingdom)

    Delegated Regulation Feedback CNIPA, the Committee of National Institutes of Intellectual Property Attorneys, thanks the Commission for requesting user’s feedback on the draft Delegated Regulation, and would be grateful if the following comments could be taken into consideration: Explanatory Memorandum • Paragraph 3.3 - We suggest the change of “examiners” to “examination” to match to the terminology for the other divisions mentioned. •...

All feedback (8) >