Table 2 Advantages and disadvantages with certain commonly used cyto-/genotoxic assays.

Advantages Disadvantages
MN
  • detection of chromosome and genome mutations
  • discrimination between clastogen and aneugen effects by using FISH or CREST
  • co-detection of apoptosis and necrosis possible
  • no cell type dependency
  • fast, inexpensive, easy
  • allow automatic scoring
  • cell division is needed
  • detects only acentric fragments (for structural chromosome aberrations)
MN with cytochalasin B
  • discrimination between cells with and without nuclear division
  • detection of dicentric bridges asnucleoplasmic bridges
  • measurement of cell proliferation (% binucleated cells)
  • possible interference of cyto-B with test agent; e.g. spindle poisons andother inhibitors of cytokinesis
  • cytoxicity of cyto-B varies between cell types
CA
  • identification of all chromosome mutation types
  • co-detection of mitotic indices
  • needs cell cultivation (mitosis)
  • need of highly skilled and experienced personnel
  • labour and cost intensive
  • subjectivity
  • automatic scoring is not possible
SCGE/ Comet assay
  • no cell cultivation
  • estimation of DNA repair capacity
  • fast, inexpensive, easy
  • some indication of apoptosis
  • quality of protocol and experimental performance is of crucial importance especially during electrophoresis
SCE
  • co-detection of cell proliferation rate
  • does not necessarily indicate mutagenicity
  • needs cell cultivation (two mitoses and two consecutive S phases)
  • mechanism unknown
  • addition of BrdU
  • time consuming

Source: SCENIHR  Health Effects of Exposure to EMF (2009),
3.8 Methodological framework, p. 59