The plan concerns cod, sprat and herring and aims to make fishing in the Baltic more sustainable. European Commissioner for Environment, Fisheries and maritime Affairs Karmenu Vella said: 'The European Commission welcomes European Parliament's progress that ensures the adoption of the Baltic Plan as soon as possible. This is what the fishing industry needs. The 196 amendments submitted by the Members of the European Parliament confirm that the plan has drawn a huge interest and not only from the Baltic states. The Commission needs time to analyze the voting results in order to understand better the implication of the voted amendments'.
Background on Baltic Sea fisheries
The Baltic multiannual plan was adopted by the Commission in October 2014. It was discussed in the Council’s working group and PECH Committee. At the end of April 2015, the AGRIFISH Council will discuss its general approach and the Parliament will vote on the report in its plenary session.
The main fisheries in the Baltic are cod, herring and sprat:
Only three herring stocks (out of the seven stocks in total that are considered in the plan) in the Central Baltic, the Gulf of Riga and the Bothnian Sea are currently exploited at levels consistent with Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY).
The cod stocks are currently subject to a long term management plan, which does not address anymore the reality of the status of the stocks. The targets established in the plan are not coherent with the MSY approach. The plan introduced a parallel system of stock management by limiting the fishing effort, which scientists lately concluded as unnecessary. The main management tool for pelagic stocks is a yearly catch limit established by the Council.
The Total Allowable Catches (TACs) and quotas are based on yearly political agreements in the Council and there can be large fluctuations from year to year. This makes it very difficult to ensure that fishing mortality will be consistent with MSY by 2015. The unpredictability in the level of future fishing opportunities makes it difficult for the industry to plan ahead, risking additional adaptation costs. Too high or exceeded TACs have contributed to fishing mortality leading to reduced yields and income.