EUSurvey       
Login | |
system message icon

Published Results: personal-pension-fra...

Export
For performance reasons you can only set a maximum of 3 filters
First name and last name:(organisation-identity-public)
Name of your organisation:([ID2])
Is your organisation included in the Transparency Register? (If your organisation is not registered, we invite you to register here, although it is not compulsory to be registered to reply to this consultation. Why a transparency register?)(transparency-register)
If so, please indicate your Register ID number:(id-transparency-register)
Type of organisation:(organisation-type)
Please specify the type of organisation:(specify-organisation-type)
Type of public authority(public-authority-type)
Please specify the type of public authority:(specify-public-authority-type)
Where are you based and/or where do you carry out your activity?(country)
Please specify your country:(specify-country)
Field of activity or sector (if applicable):(activity-field)
Please specify your activity field(s) or sector(s):(specify-activity-field)
Contributions received are intended for publication on the Commission’s website. Do you agree to your contribution being published? (see specific privacy statement )(contributions-publication)
1. Do you offer personal pension products to consumers?([ID5])
If yes, please specify in which Member States:([ID9])
2. What are the issues which limit the development of personal pensions in your Member State? (Please specify your answer below in maximum 500 characters. You may reply to one or several categories) a. National legal requirements (e.g. prudential rules governing providers, administrative rules, tax regime for personal retirement saving, non-tax legal requirements, etc.)([ID81])
b. Barriers to entry for providers (e.g. costs are too high to enter the market, competition is not strong enough on the market, the current low interest rates disincentivise providers to offer long-term products, etc.)([ID82])
c. Insufficient demand from individuals for personal pensions (e.g. lack of information about pension savings, low level of individuals' financial literacy, lack of interest in pension savings, insufficient income for pensions savings purposes)([ID83])
d. Insufficient public policy incentives to stimulate saving in personal pension products([ID84])
e. Any other limitation([ID85])
3. What are the issues which limit the development of personal pensions across borders? (Please specify your answer below in maximum 500 characters. You may reply to one or several categories) a. Varying national legal requirements (e.g. complexity of national legal frameworks, differing national tax requirements, difference in conduct of business rules, etc.)([ID86])
b. Challenges for providers to operate cross-border (e.g. high set up costs, high operating costs in another Member State, language issues, unfamiliar customer base, branding issues, local dominant distribution channels, presence of conflicts of interest in the distribution channels, etc.)([ID87])
c. Insufficient demand from individuals for cross-border pensions (e.g. uncertainties about cross-border providers, perception that a cross-border pension would only be relevant in case of mobility, etc.)([ID88])
d. Any other limitation([ID89])
4. Should there be a default investment option in a personal pension product which would provide simplicity and safety catering for the needs of a majority of personal pension savers?([ID92])
5. Which type of protection should be attached to the default investment option ensuring simplicity and safety for investors in personal pensions?([ID96])
Please specify:([ID74])
6. Should the number of alternative investment options be limited?([ID98])
If yes, please specify the scope of the limitation and which type of protection they should feature:([ID97])
7. Should a personal pension product be portable? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Across Member States ([ID102])
7. Should a personal pension product be portable? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Within the same Member State ([ID103])
7. Should a personal pension product be portable? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Both within the same Member State and across Member States ([ID77])
8. What are the main barriers for portability of existing personal pension products?([ID106])
9. The PRIIPs Key Information Document (KID) provides an example of pre-contractual information disclosure. Should the KID be used for the purposes of personal pensions disclosures? Alternatively, which KID elements could be directly used for disclosures regarding a potential EU personal pension and what are the elements that should be adapted (e.g. to take into account the long-term nature of the investment)?([ID110])
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Available investment options ([ID118])
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Different types of fees ([ID119])
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Level of fees disclosed annually ([ID120])
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : The rate of return over the last two years ([ID123])
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Level of protection provided ([ID124])
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Information provided in a standardised format (similarly to the PRIIPs KID) ([ID125])
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : The tax regime for contributions, returns and pay-outs ([ID126])
Is there any other information that would be of importance for savers before signing up to a product?([ID127])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Current investment option ([ID138])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Available investment options ([ID139])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Level of fees ([ID140])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : The rate of return ([ID143])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Level of protection provided ([ID144])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Accumulated benefits ([ID145])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Expected benefits at retirement ([ID146])
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : The tax treatment of savings ([ID147])
Any other information that would be of importance for savers during the product lifetime?([ID148])
12. As a provider, which types of distribution channels would you favour in order to maximise the benefits and efficiency gains of a Single Market for personal pensions (e.g. online/face-to-face, directly/via agents)?([ID10])
13. Would you consider that advice should be mandatory for the provision of personal pensions?([ID152])
14. Under what conditions should it be possible to switch personal pension providers?([ID155])
Please explain: (optional)([ID79])
15. Which forms of pay-out should be favoured? (Please provide an explanation of your choice)([ID162])
Please explain: (optional)([ID80])
16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Level of fees and returns ([ID173])
16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Transparency on fees and costs ([ID174])
16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Type of investment policy (active vs passive) ([ID175])
16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Ease of distribution ([ID178])
16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Consumer awareness of the availability of retirement products ([ID179])
16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : A benchmark to assess the product's performance, safety and simplicity ([ID180])
16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Tax and other financial incentives to personal pension savings ([ID181])
17. In your experience, to what extent are tax incentives important for the uptake of personal pension products by savers? Please explain:([ID192])
18. If you are a provider offering personal pension products in other Member States, how do you accommodate differing national tax regimes?([ID11])
Please specify:([ID15])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Larger pools of assets due to a wider reach ([ID200])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Opens up the market to other providers ([ID201])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Improved asset allocation ([ID202])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Product innovation ([ID205])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Improved returns ([ID206])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Lower operating costs ([ID207])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Attractive to mobile customers ([ID208])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Attractive to regular (non-mobile) customers ([ID209])
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale? (Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply) : Encourages a level playing field between providers ([ID210])
Others? Please specify:([ID211])
20. The EU could foster cooperation between stakeholders (Member States, providers, consumers) around a common approach to providing personal pension products. This would imply designing together with the national authorities, pension industry and consumers a series of recommendations which providers could follow when offering personal pensions. Fostering cooperation among stakeholders would... : Enhance the take-up of personal pensions by consumers in the EU ([ID218])
20. The EU could foster cooperation between stakeholders (Member States, providers, consumers) around a common approach to providing personal pension products. This would imply designing together with the national authorities, pension industry and consumers a series of recommendations which providers could follow when offering personal pensions. Fostering cooperation among stakeholders would... : Enhance cross border offer of personal pension products by providers in the EU ([ID219])
20. The EU could foster cooperation between stakeholders (Member States, providers, consumers) around a common approach to providing personal pension products. This would imply designing together with the national authorities, pension industry and consumers a series of recommendations which providers could follow when offering personal pensions. Fostering cooperation among stakeholders would... : Widen the range of providers ([ID220])
20. The EU could foster cooperation between stakeholders (Member States, providers, consumers) around a common approach to providing personal pension products. This would imply designing together with the national authorities, pension industry and consumers a series of recommendations which providers could follow when offering personal pensions. Fostering cooperation among stakeholders would... : Enhance efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products ([ID223])
20. The EU could foster cooperation between stakeholders (Member States, providers, consumers) around a common approach to providing personal pension products. This would imply designing together with the national authorities, pension industry and consumers a series of recommendations which providers could follow when offering personal pensions. Fostering cooperation among stakeholders would... : Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product market ([ID224])
Other (please specify):([ID225])
21. A European personal pension account could be established, similarly to the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) offered in the United States. An IRA is a personal savings plan that gives individuals tax advantages when saving for retirement. It encompasses different types of plans, depending on the income or employment status of an individual, their tax circumstances and the investment options they choose. There can be many different types of providers: an IRA can be opened with banks, credit unions, insurance companies, mutual fund companies and brokerage firms. Most IRA providers offer a broad variety of investment options, including stocks and bonds, money market funds and mutual funds. Would such an approach address the challenges below? A personal pension account would... : Enhance the take-up of personal pensions by consumers in the EU ([ID131])
21. A European personal pension account could be established, similarly to the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) offered in the United States. An IRA is a personal savings plan that gives individuals tax advantages when saving for retirement. It encompasses different types of plans, depending on the income or employment status of an individual, their tax circumstances and the investment options they choose. There can be many different types of providers: an IRA can be opened with banks, credit unions, insurance companies, mutual fund companies and brokerage firms. Most IRA providers offer a broad variety of investment options, including stocks and bonds, money market funds and mutual funds. Would such an approach address the challenges below? A personal pension account would... : Enhance cross border offer of personal pension products by providers within the EU ([ID133])
21. A European personal pension account could be established, similarly to the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) offered in the United States. An IRA is a personal savings plan that gives individuals tax advantages when saving for retirement. It encompasses different types of plans, depending on the income or employment status of an individual, their tax circumstances and the investment options they choose. There can be many different types of providers: an IRA can be opened with banks, credit unions, insurance companies, mutual fund companies and brokerage firms. Most IRA providers offer a broad variety of investment options, including stocks and bonds, money market funds and mutual funds. Would such an approach address the challenges below? A personal pension account would... : Widen the range of providers ([ID157])
21. A European personal pension account could be established, similarly to the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) offered in the United States. An IRA is a personal savings plan that gives individuals tax advantages when saving for retirement. It encompasses different types of plans, depending on the income or employment status of an individual, their tax circumstances and the investment options they choose. There can be many different types of providers: an IRA can be opened with banks, credit unions, insurance companies, mutual fund companies and brokerage firms. Most IRA providers offer a broad variety of investment options, including stocks and bonds, money market funds and mutual funds. Would such an approach address the challenges below? A personal pension account would... : Enhance the efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products ([ID158])
21. A European personal pension account could be established, similarly to the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) offered in the United States. An IRA is a personal savings plan that gives individuals tax advantages when saving for retirement. It encompasses different types of plans, depending on the income or employment status of an individual, their tax circumstances and the investment options they choose. There can be many different types of providers: an IRA can be opened with banks, credit unions, insurance companies, mutual fund companies and brokerage firms. Most IRA providers offer a broad variety of investment options, including stocks and bonds, money market funds and mutual funds. Would such an approach address the challenges below? A personal pension account would... : Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product offer ([ID159])
Other (please specify):([ID163])
22. A European personal pension product could be established on a voluntary basis, based on a set of common and flexible features, in order to provide pension income in retirement. Such features could include transparency and disclosure requirements, investment options, accumulation and decumulation options, distribution specificities, guarantees on the product, and fees and charges levied. The main difference between a personal pension account (described under question 36) and a personal pension product is that a personal pension account does not pre-define investment options. The role of tax advantages would be similar for the personal pension account and the personal pension product. This approach could take inspiration from the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), European Long Term Investment Funds (ELTIF), the EuVECA and EuSEF funds, the European company statute and the EIOPA advice on the development of a Pan-European Personal Pension Product. A European personal pension product would... : Enhance the take-up of personal pension products by consumers in the EU ([ID186])
22. A European personal pension product could be established on a voluntary basis, based on a set of common and flexible features, in order to provide pension income in retirement. Such features could include transparency and disclosure requirements, investment options, accumulation and decumulation options, distribution specificities, guarantees on the product, and fees and charges levied. The main difference between a personal pension account (described under question 36) and a personal pension product is that a personal pension account does not pre-define investment options. The role of tax advantages would be similar for the personal pension account and the personal pension product. This approach could take inspiration from the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), European Long Term Investment Funds (ELTIF), the EuVECA and EuSEF funds, the European company statute and the EIOPA advice on the development of a Pan-European Personal Pension Product. A European personal pension product would... : Enhance cross border offer of personal pension products by providers within the EU ([ID187])
22. A European personal pension product could be established on a voluntary basis, based on a set of common and flexible features, in order to provide pension income in retirement. Such features could include transparency and disclosure requirements, investment options, accumulation and decumulation options, distribution specificities, guarantees on the product, and fees and charges levied. The main difference between a personal pension account (described under question 36) and a personal pension product is that a personal pension account does not pre-define investment options. The role of tax advantages would be similar for the personal pension account and the personal pension product. This approach could take inspiration from the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), European Long Term Investment Funds (ELTIF), the EuVECA and EuSEF funds, the European company statute and the EIOPA advice on the development of a Pan-European Personal Pension Product. A European personal pension product would... : Widen the range of providers ([ID188])
22. A European personal pension product could be established on a voluntary basis, based on a set of common and flexible features, in order to provide pension income in retirement. Such features could include transparency and disclosure requirements, investment options, accumulation and decumulation options, distribution specificities, guarantees on the product, and fees and charges levied. The main difference between a personal pension account (described under question 36) and a personal pension product is that a personal pension account does not pre-define investment options. The role of tax advantages would be similar for the personal pension account and the personal pension product. This approach could take inspiration from the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), European Long Term Investment Funds (ELTIF), the EuVECA and EuSEF funds, the European company statute and the EIOPA advice on the development of a Pan-European Personal Pension Product. A European personal pension product would... : Enhance the efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products ([ID189])
22. A European personal pension product could be established on a voluntary basis, based on a set of common and flexible features, in order to provide pension income in retirement. Such features could include transparency and disclosure requirements, investment options, accumulation and decumulation options, distribution specificities, guarantees on the product, and fees and charges levied. The main difference between a personal pension account (described under question 36) and a personal pension product is that a personal pension account does not pre-define investment options. The role of tax advantages would be similar for the personal pension account and the personal pension product. This approach could take inspiration from the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), European Long Term Investment Funds (ELTIF), the EuVECA and EuSEF funds, the European company statute and the EIOPA advice on the development of a Pan-European Personal Pension Product. A European personal pension product would... : Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product offer ([ID190])
Other (please specify):([ID191])
23. The EU could consider harmonising national personal pension regimes, in particular on the aspects of prudential supervision, possible providers, maximum costs, disclosure requirements, distribution models etc. but excluding tax requirements. Would such an approach address the challenges below? Harmonising national personal pension regimes would... : Enhance the take-up of personal pension products by consumers within the EU ([ID230])
23. The EU could consider harmonising national personal pension regimes, in particular on the aspects of prudential supervision, possible providers, maximum costs, disclosure requirements, distribution models etc. but excluding tax requirements. Would such an approach address the challenges below? Harmonising national personal pension regimes would... : Enhance cross border offering of personal pension products by providers within the EU ([ID231])
23. The EU could consider harmonising national personal pension regimes, in particular on the aspects of prudential supervision, possible providers, maximum costs, disclosure requirements, distribution models etc. but excluding tax requirements. Would such an approach address the challenges below? Harmonising national personal pension regimes would... : Contribute to a wide range of providers to offer personal pension products ([ID232])
23. The EU could consider harmonising national personal pension regimes, in particular on the aspects of prudential supervision, possible providers, maximum costs, disclosure requirements, distribution models etc. but excluding tax requirements. Would such an approach address the challenges below? Harmonising national personal pension regimes would... : Contribute to enhancing the efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products ([ID233])
23. The EU could consider harmonising national personal pension regimes, in particular on the aspects of prudential supervision, possible providers, maximum costs, disclosure requirements, distribution models etc. but excluding tax requirements. Would such an approach address the challenges below? Harmonising national personal pension regimes would... : Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product offer ([ID234])
Other (please specify):([ID235])
24. Would you favour an alternative EU approach? Please provide details.([ID236])
Should you wish to provide additional information (e.g. a position paper, report) or raise specific points not covered by the questionnaire, you can upload your additional document(s) here:(file-upload)
All Values
Apply Filter
Academic institution
Company, SME, micro-enterprise, sole trader
Consultancy, law firm
Consumer organisation
Industry association
Media
Non-governmental organisation
Think tank
Trade union
Other
All Values
Apply Filter
International or European organisation
Regional or local authority
Government or Ministry
Regulatory authority, Supervisory authority or Central bank
Other public authority
All Values
Apply Filter
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
The Netherlands
United Kingdom
Other country
All Values
Apply Filter
Accounting
Auditing
Banking
Credit rating agencies
Insurance
Pension provision
Investment management (e.g. hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, money market funds, securities)
Market infrastructure operation (e.g. CCPs, CSDs, Stock exchanges)
Social entrepreneurship
Other
Not applicable
All Values
Apply Filter
Yes, I agree to my response being published under the name I indicate (name of your organisation/company/public authority or your name if your reply as an individual)
No, I do not want my response to be published
All Values
Apply Filter
No, we do not offer personal pension products
Yes , in one Member State
Yes, in more than one Member State
All Values
Apply Filter
Yes
No
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Guarantee on capital
Guarantee on returns
No need for a guarantee
Other
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Switching should be without conditions
Switching should be subject to a fee
Switching should be only possible after a minimum period of time and be allowed only a limited number of times
Switching should not be possible
All Values
Apply Filter
lump sum
life time annuities
temporary annuities (limited in time)
individuals' choice
any other
there should be flexibility on pay-out
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
We operate through branches or subsidiaries
We operate directly across the border without branches or subsidiaries
Other
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Not at all important
Rather unimportant
Fairly important
Very important
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
…not address this challenge at all
…partly address this challenge
…largely address this challenge
…decisively address this challenge
No opinion

No contribution to display no data

Rows per Page 
1
First name and last name:
Name of your organisation:
Is your organisation included in the Transparency Register?
(If your organisation is not registered, we invite you to register here, although it is not compulsory to be registered to reply to this consultation. Why a transparency register?)
If so, please indicate your Register ID number:
Type of organisation:
Please specify the type of organisation:
Type of public authority
Please specify the type of public authority:
Where are you based and/or where do you carry out your activity?
Please specify your country:
Field of activity or sector (if applicable):
Please specify your activity field(s) or sector(s):
Contributions received are intended for publication on the Commission’s website. Do you agree to your contribution being published?
(see specific privacy statement PDF)
1. Do you offer personal pension products to consumers?
If yes, please specify in which Member States:
2. What are the issues which limit the development of personal pensions in your Member State?
(Please specify your answer below in maximum 500 characters. You may reply to one or several categories)

a. National legal requirements (e.g. prudential rules governing providers, administrative rules, tax regime for personal retirement saving, non-tax legal requirements, etc.)
b. Barriers to entry for providers (e.g. costs are too high to enter the market, competition is not strong enough on the market, the current low interest rates disincentivise providers to offer long-term products, etc.)
c. Insufficient demand from individuals for personal pensions (e.g. lack of information about pension savings, low level of individuals' financial literacy, lack of interest in pension savings, insufficient income for pensions savings purposes)
d. Insufficient public policy incentives to stimulate saving in personal pension products
e. Any other limitation
3. What are the issues which limit the development of personal pensions across borders?
(Please specify your answer below in maximum 500 characters. You may reply to one or several categories)

a. Varying national legal requirements (e.g. complexity of national legal frameworks, differing national tax requirements, difference in conduct of business rules, etc.)
b. Challenges for providers to operate cross-border (e.g. high set up costs, high operating costs in another Member State, language issues, unfamiliar customer base, branding issues, local dominant distribution channels, presence of conflicts of interest in the distribution channels, etc.)
c. Insufficient demand from individuals for cross-border pensions (e.g. uncertainties about cross-border providers, perception that a cross-border pension would only be relevant in case of mobility, etc.)
d. Any other limitation
4. Should there be a default investment option in a personal pension product which would provide simplicity and safety catering for the needs of a majority of personal pension savers?
5. Which type of protection should be attached to the default investment option ensuring simplicity and safety for investors in personal pensions?
Please specify:
6. Should the number of alternative investment options be limited?
If yes, please specify the scope of the limitation and which type of protection they should feature:
7. Should a personal pension product be portable?
(Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply)
Across Member States
Within the same Member State
Both within the same Member State and across Member States
8. What are the main barriers for portability of existing personal pension products?
9. The PRIIPs Key Information Document (KID) provides an example of pre-contractual information disclosure. Should the KID be used for the purposes of personal pensions disclosures? Alternatively, which KID elements could be directly used for disclosures regarding a potential EU personal pension and what are the elements that should be adapted (e.g. to take into account the long-term nature of the investment)?
10. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers before signing up to a product?
(Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply)
Available investment options
Different types of fees
Level of fees disclosed annually
The rate of return over the last two years
Level of protection provided
Information provided in a standardised format (similarly to the PRIIPs KID)
The tax regime for contributions, returns and pay-outs
Is there any other information that would be of importance for savers before signing up to a product?
11. What information, in your opinion, is most relevant to individual savers during the lifetime of the product?
(Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply)
Current investment option
Available investment options
Level of fees
The rate of return
Level of protection provided
Accumulated benefits
Expected benefits at retirement
The tax treatment of savings
Any other information that would be of importance for savers during the product lifetime?
12. As a provider, which types of distribution channels would you favour in order to maximise the benefits and efficiency gains of a Single Market for personal pensions (e.g. online/face-to-face, directly/via agents)?
13. Would you consider that advice should be mandatory for the provision of personal pensions?
14. Under what conditions should it be possible to switch personal pension providers?

Please explain: (optional)

15. Which forms of pay-out should be favoured?
(Please provide an explanation of your choice)

Please explain: (optional)

16. Overall, in your opinion, what factors would encourage competition to offer high quality, affordable personal pension products?
(Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply)
Level of fees and returns
Transparency on fees and costs
Type of investment policy (active vs passive)
Ease of distribution
Consumer awareness of the availability of retirement products
A benchmark to assess the product's performance, safety and simplicity
Tax and other financial incentives to personal pension savings
17. In your experience, to what extent are tax incentives important for the uptake of personal pension products by savers?
Please explain:
18. If you are a provider offering personal pension products in other Member States, how do you accommodate differing national tax regimes?
Please specify:
19. In your opinion, what are the most significant benefits of providing personal pensions on an EU scale?
(Please tick the appropriate field, only one choice is allowed per category of reply)
Larger pools of assets due to a wider reach
Opens up the market to other providers
Improved asset allocation
Product innovation
Improved returns
Lower operating costs
Attractive to mobile customers
Attractive to regular (non-mobile) customers
Encourages a level playing field between providers
Others? Please specify:
20. The EU could foster cooperation between stakeholders (Member States, providers, consumers) around a common approach to providing personal pension products. This would imply designing together with the national authorities, pension industry and consumers a series of recommendations which providers could follow when offering personal pensions.

Fostering cooperation among stakeholders would...
Enhance the take-up of personal pensions by consumers in the EU
Enhance cross border offer of personal pension products by providers in the EU
Widen the range of providers
Enhance efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products
Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product market
Other (please specify):
21. A European personal pension account could be established, similarly to the Individual Retirement Account (IRA) offered in the United States. An IRA is a personal savings plan that gives individuals tax advantages when saving for retirement. It encompasses different types of plans, depending on the income or employment status of an individual, their tax circumstances and the investment options they choose. There can be many different types of providers: an IRA can be opened with banks, credit unions, insurance companies, mutual fund companies and brokerage firms. Most IRA providers offer a broad variety of investment options, including stocks and bonds, money market funds and mutual funds.

Would such an approach address the challenges below?

A personal pension account would...
Enhance the take-up of personal pensions by consumers in the EU
Enhance cross border offer of personal pension products by providers within the EU
Widen the range of providers
Enhance the efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products
Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product offer
Other (please specify):
22. A European personal pension product could be established on a voluntary basis, based on a set of common and flexible features, in order to provide pension income in retirement. Such features could include transparency and disclosure requirements, investment options, accumulation and decumulation options, distribution specificities, guarantees on the product, and fees and charges levied. The main difference between a personal pension account (described under question 36) and a personal pension product is that a personal pension account does not pre-define investment options. The role of tax advantages would be similar for the personal pension account and the personal pension product. This approach could take inspiration from the Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities (UCITS), European Long Term Investment Funds (ELTIF), the EuVECA and EuSEF funds, the European company statute and the EIOPA advice on the development of a Pan-European Personal Pension Product.

A European personal pension product would...
Enhance the take-up of personal pension products by consumers in the EU
Enhance cross border offer of personal pension products by providers within the EU
Widen the range of providers
Enhance the efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products
Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product offer
Other (please specify):
23. The EU could consider harmonising national personal pension regimes, in particular on the aspects of prudential supervision, possible providers, maximum costs, disclosure requirements, distribution models etc. but excluding tax requirements. Would such an approach address the challenges below?

Harmonising national personal pension regimes would...
Enhance the take-up of personal pension products by consumers within the EU
Enhance cross border offering of personal pension products by providers within the EU
Contribute to a wide range of providers to offer personal pension products
Contribute to enhancing the efficiency, asset allocation and returns when offering personal pension products
Contribute to innovation within the personal pension product offer
Other (please specify):
24. Would you favour an alternative EU approach?
Please provide details.

Should you wish to provide additional information (e.g. a position paper, report) or raise specific points not covered by the questionnaire, you can upload your additional document(s) here:

1
Export
Version 1.4.4.6721 (22/08/2019 12:03)
system message icon
Export  available for download
Go to Export Page
system message icon
system message icon