system message icon

Published Results: 2017-eu-funds-strate...

Export
For performance reasons you can only set a maximum of 3 filters
1. You are replying([ID2])
5. Country of residence([ID9])
5.a. Please specify "Other"([ID7])
8. Is your organisation included in the Transparency Register?([ID2])
10. Country of organisation's headquarters([ID9])
10.a. Please specify "Other"([ID7])
11. Type of organisation([ID123])
11.a. Please specify "Other"([ID7])
11.b. Please specify the type of organisation([ID2])
11.c. Please specify "Other"([ID7])
11.d. Please specify the type of organisation([ID2])
11.e. Please specify the type of organisation([ID2])
11.f. Please specify "Other"([ID7])
11.g. Please specify the type of organisation([ID2])
12. How many employees does the organisation have?([ID2])
13. Please let us know whether you have experience with one or more of the following funds and programmes:([ID2])
14. Please let us know to which of the following topics your replies to this questionnaire will refer:([ID2])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Promoting economic growth and jobs across the EU ([ID97])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy and society ([ID98])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Completion of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications ([ID99])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Transition towards clean, competitive and connected mobility ([ID100])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Transition of EU energy, ensuring security of supply ([ID101])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Implementation of the Digital Single Market ([ID102])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Long term sustainability of Europe's space capability ([ID103])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Development of new long-term energy sources ([ID104])
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view? : Other (please specify below) ([ID105])
1.a. Please specify if you identified another policy challenge([ID7])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Promoting economic growth and jobs across the EU ([ID97])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy and society ([ID98])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Completion of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications ([ID99])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Transition towards clean, competitive and connected mobility ([ID100])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Transition of EU energy, ensuring security of supply ([ID101])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Implementation of the Digital Single Market ([ID102])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Long term sustainability of Europe's space capability ([ID103])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Development of new long-term energy sources ([ID104])
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges? : Other (please specify below) ([ID105])
2.a. Please specify if you identified another policy challenge([ID7])
3. To what extent do the current programmes/funds add value, compared to what Member States could achieve at national, regional and/or local levels?([ID2])
4. Please specify how the current programmes/funds add value compared to what Member States could achieve at national, regional and/or local levels. Please clearly indicate to which policies, programmes and funds your answers refer.([ID7])
5. Is there a need to modify or add to the objectives of the programmes/funds in this policy area? If yes, which changes would be necessary or desirable? Please clearly indicate to which policies, programmes and funds your answers refer.([ID7])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Complex procedures leading to high administrative burden and delays ([ID112])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Insufficient administrative capacity to manage programmes ([ID113])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Limited information about funding and selection process ([ID114])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Lack of flexibility to react to unforeseen circumstances and to new user needs ([ID115])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Difficulty of combining EU action with other public interventions ([ID116])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Insufficient synergies between the EU programmes/funds ([ID117])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Difficulty to ensure the sustainability of projects when the financing period ends ([ID118])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Difficulty to access financial instruments to complement funding ([ID119])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Inadequate co-financing rates ([ID120])
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives? : Other (please specify below) ([ID105])
6.a. Please specify if you have identified another obstacle([ID7])
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced? : Alignment of rules between EU funds ([ID127])
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced? : Fewer, clearer, shorter rules ([ID128])
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced? : More reliance on national rules ([ID129])
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced? : Sufficient flexibility between programming periods ([ID130])
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced? : More flexibility of resource allocation to respond to unexpected needs ([ID131])
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced? : More effective stakeholders' involvement in the programming, implementation and evaluation ([ID132])
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced? : Other (please specify below) ([ID105])
7.a. Please specify if you have identified another way to simplify and reduce burdens([ID7])
8. How could synergies among programmes/funds in this area be further strengthened to avoid possible overlaps/duplication? For example, would you consider grouping/merging some programmes? Please clearly indicate to which policies, programmes and funds your answers refer.([ID7])
2. If you wish to add further information — within the scope of this questionnaire — please feel free to do so here.([ID7])
All Values
Apply Filter
as an individual in your personal capacity
in your professional capacity or on behalf of an organisation
All Values
Apply Filter
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Other (please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Other (please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
Private enterprise
Professional consultancy, law firm, self-employed consultant
Trade, business or professional association
Non-governmental organisation, platform network
Research and academia
Churches and religious communities
Regional or local authority (public or mixed)
International or national public authority
Other (Please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
Chamber of commerce
Business organisation
Trade Union
Representative of professions or crafts
Other (Please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
Think tank
Research institution
Academic institution
All Values
Apply Filter
Regional public authority
Local public authority
Public-private sub-national organisation
Network of public sub-national authorities
Other (Please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
Intergovernmental organisation
EU institution, body or agency
National parliament
National government
National public authority or agency
All Values
Apply Filter
More than 250 employees (Large enterprise)
Between 50 and 250 employees (Medium-sized enterprise)
Between 10 and 49 employees (Small enterprise)
Less than 10 employees (Micro enterprise)
Self-employed (Micro enterprise)
Not applicable
All Values
Apply Filter
Connecting Europe Facility Programme (CEF) - Energy
Connecting Europe Facility Programme (CEF) - Telecom
Connecting Europe Facility Programme (CEF) - Transport
Galileo, EGNOS, Copernicus or Space Surveillance and Tracking
All Values
Apply Filter
Transport
Energy
Digital
Space
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Rather important
Neither important nor unimportant
Rather not important
Not important at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
Fully addressed
Fairly well addressed
Addressed to some extent only
Not addressed at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
Don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion
All Values
Apply Filter
To a large extent
To a fairly large extent
To some extent only
Not at all
No opinion

No contribution to display no data

Rows per Page 
1
1. You are replying
5. Country of residence
5.a. Please specify "Other"
8. Is your organisation included in the Transparency Register?
10. Country of organisation's headquarters
10.a. Please specify "Other"
11. Type of organisation
11.a. Please specify "Other"
11.b. Please specify the type of organisation
11.c. Please specify "Other"
11.d. Please specify the type of organisation
11.e. Please specify the type of organisation
11.f. Please specify "Other"
11.g. Please specify the type of organisation
12. How many employees does the organisation have?
13. Please let us know whether you have experience with one or more of the following funds and programmes:
14. Please let us know to which of the following topics your replies to this questionnaire will refer:
1. The Commission has preliminarily identified a number of policy challenges which programmes/funds in this area -strategic infrastructure - could address. How important are these policy challenges in your view?
Promoting economic growth and jobs across the EU
Transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy and society
Completion of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications
Transition towards clean, competitive and connected mobility
Transition of EU energy, ensuring security of supply
Implementation of the Digital Single Market
Long term sustainability of Europe's space capability
Development of new long-term energy sources
Other (please specify below)
1.a. Please specify if you identified another policy challenge
2. To what extent do the current programmes/funds successfully address these challenges?
Promoting economic growth and jobs across the EU
Transition to a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy and society
Completion of trans-European networks in the areas of transport, energy and telecommunications
Transition towards clean, competitive and connected mobility
Transition of EU energy, ensuring security of supply
Implementation of the Digital Single Market
Long term sustainability of Europe's space capability
Development of new long-term energy sources
Other (please specify below)
2.a. Please specify if you identified another policy challenge
3. To what extent do the current programmes/funds add value, compared to what Member States could achieve at national, regional and/or local levels?
4. Please specify how the current programmes/funds add value compared to what Member States could achieve at national, regional and/or local levels.
Please clearly indicate to which policies, programmes and funds your answers refer.
5. Is there a need to modify or add to the objectives of the programmes/funds in this policy area?
If yes, which changes would be necessary or desirable?
Please clearly indicate to which policies, programmes and funds your answers refer.
6. To what extent do you consider the following as obstacles which prevent the current programmes/funds from successfully achieving their objectives?
Complex procedures leading to high administrative burden and delays
Insufficient administrative capacity to manage programmes
Limited information about funding and selection process
Lack of flexibility to react to unforeseen circumstances and to new user needs
Difficulty of combining EU action with other public interventions
Insufficient synergies between the EU programmes/funds
Difficulty to ensure the sustainability of projects when the financing period ends
Difficulty to access financial instruments to complement funding
Inadequate co-financing rates
Other (please specify below)
6.a. Please specify if you have identified another obstacle
7. How could current programmes/funds be further simplified and administrative burdens for beneficiaries be reduced?
Alignment of rules between EU funds
Fewer, clearer, shorter rules
More reliance on national rules
Sufficient flexibility between programming periods
More flexibility of resource allocation to respond to unexpected needs
More effective stakeholders' involvement in the programming, implementation and evaluation
Other (please specify below)
7.a. Please specify if you have identified another way to simplify and reduce burdens
8. How could synergies among programmes/funds in this area be further strengthened to avoid possible overlaps/duplication? For example, would you consider grouping/merging some programmes?
Please clearly indicate to which policies, programmes and funds your answers refer.
2. If you wish to add further information — within the scope of this questionnaire — please feel free to do so here.
1
Export
system message icon
Export  available for download
Go to Export Page