EUSurvey       
Login | |
system message icon

Published Results: 2017-C-ITS

Export
For performance reasons you can only set a maximum of 3 filters
Please let us know in which language you are replying.([ID6])
Note that, whatever option chosen, your answers may be subject to a request for public access to documents under Regulation (EC) N°1049/2001([ID31])
May the Commission contact you, in case further details on the submitted information in this questionnaire are required?([ID37])
1. Are you replying as / on behalf of:([ID44])
3. Is the entity on whose behalf you are replying registered in the EU Transparency Register?([ID57])
6. Please specify your country of residence([ID66])
7. Please specify which interests you (the organisation on behalf of which you respond) represent:([ID97])
7.a. Please specify "Other"([ID55])
8. What is the size of the organisation on behalf of which you respond?([ID120])
9. In addition to this general consultation, targeted follow-up will be organised with key professional stakeholders on certain topics. If you are a professional stakeholder, would you be interested in participating in this targeted consultation?([ID128])
1. How familiar are you with cooperative intelligent transport systems?([ID1])
2. How familiar are you with the ITS Directive and the EU actions to support the deployment of intelligent transport systems?([ID1])
3. How familiar are you with the following initiatives in the area of cooperative, connected and automated mobility? : C-ITS Platform ([ID95])
3. How familiar are you with the following initiatives in the area of cooperative, connected and automated mobility? : C-ROADS Platform ([ID98])
3. How familiar are you with the following initiatives in the area of cooperative, connected and automated mobility? : GEAR2030 ([ID99])
3. How familiar are you with the following initiatives in the area of cooperative, connected and automated mobility? : Horizon 2020 research activities ([ID112])
3. How familiar are you with the following initiatives in the area of cooperative, connected and automated mobility? : Letter of Intent on the testing and large scale demonstration of Connected and Automated Driving ([ID113])
3. How familiar are you with the following initiatives in the area of cooperative, connected and automated mobility? : EATA Roundtable ([ID114])
4. Do you agree with the assessment above?([ID117])
5. Please elaborate on your answer to the previous question.([ID136])
6. From your point of view, how important is the contribution of these drivers to the overall problem? : The costs of C-ITS remain too high due to the fragmented deployment of separate C-ITS services and ecosystems ([ID138])
6. From your point of view, how important is the contribution of these drivers to the overall problem? : Failure to establish confidence in the cyber-security of C-ITS communications ([ID139])
6. From your point of view, how important is the contribution of these drivers to the overall problem? : Public acceptance remains limited due to unclear principles related to privacy and protection of personal data ([ID140])
6. From your point of view, how important is the contribution of these drivers to the overall problem? : Incompatible communication technologies and frequency spectrum allocation ([ID143])
6. From your point of view, how important is the contribution of these drivers to the overall problem? : Uncertain minimum requirements for interoperability of C-ITS services ([ID144])
6. From your point of view, how important is the contribution of these drivers to the overall problem? : Uncertain minimum requirements for compliance assessment for C-ITS services ([ID145])
7. Do you consider that any drivers underlying the problem are missing? Please elaborate.([ID136])
8. The Commission has established the following objectives for this initiative. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives? : Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services ([ID151])
8. The Commission has established the following objectives for this initiative. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives? : Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules ([ID152])
8. The Commission has established the following objectives for this initiative. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives? : Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS ([ID153])
8. The Commission has established the following objectives for this initiative. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives? : Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach (combining complementary communication technologies, e.g. WiFi and cellular) ([ID157])
8. The Commission has established the following objectives for this initiative. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives? : Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules ([ID158])
8. The Commission has established the following objectives for this initiative. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives? : Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework (which allows services to be checked against EU-wide requirements) ([ID159])
9. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question. Do you consider that any objectives are missing?([ID136])
10. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives through action at the EU level (as opposed to action only at the national level or international standardisation)? : Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services ([ID151])
10. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives through action at the EU level (as opposed to action only at the national level or international standardisation)? : Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules ([ID152])
10. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives through action at the EU level (as opposed to action only at the national level or international standardisation)? : Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS ([ID153])
10. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives through action at the EU level (as opposed to action only at the national level or international standardisation)? : Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach ([ID157])
10. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives through action at the EU level (as opposed to action only at the national level or international standardisation)? : Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules ([ID158])
10. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives through action at the EU level (as opposed to action only at the national level or international standardisation)? : Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework ([ID159])
11. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question.([ID136])
12.a. For the objective "Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding) ([ID168])
12.a. For the objective "Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation) ([ID169])
12.a. For the objective "Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS ([ID170])
12.b. For the objective "Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding) ([ID168])
12.b. For the objective "Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation) ([ID169])
12.b. For the objective "Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS ([ID170])
12.c. For the objective "Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding) ([ID168])
12.c. For the objective "Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation) ([ID169])
12.c. For the objective "Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS ([ID170])
12.d. For the objective "Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding) ([ID168])
12.d. For the objective "Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation) ([ID169])
12.d. For the objective "Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS ([ID170])
12.e. For the objective "Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding) ([ID168])
12.e. For the objective "Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation) ([ID169])
12.e. For the objective "Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS ([ID170])
12.f. For the objective "Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework (which allows services to be checked against EU-wide requirements)", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding) ([ID168])
12.f. For the objective "Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework (which allows services to be checked against EU-wide requirements)", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation) ([ID169])
12.f. For the objective "Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework (which allows services to be checked against EU-wide requirements)", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective. : Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS ([ID170])
13. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question. In particular, if you favour EU action, please indicate what this needs to cover and what form it should take. Please also indicate if you think other (types of) action(s) should be considered to achieve the objectives.([ID136])
14. Please indicate if you agree with the following statements on accelerating deployment of C-ITS (when services are fully functional and EU-wide specifications are in place) : Enabling conditions such as exchange of best practice and funding instruments are sufficient, thus there should be no mandatory deployment of C-ITS. ([ID172])
14. Please indicate if you agree with the following statements on accelerating deployment of C-ITS (when services are fully functional and EU-wide specifications are in place) : C-ITS equipment should be mandated in new vehicles ([ID173])
14. Please indicate if you agree with the following statements on accelerating deployment of C-ITS (when services are fully functional and EU-wide specifications are in place) : Retrofitting C-ITS equipment in existing vehicles should receive financial support ([ID174])
14. Please indicate if you agree with the following statements on accelerating deployment of C-ITS (when services are fully functional and EU-wide specifications are in place) : C-ITS roadside equipment should be mandated on core interurban transport routes (i.e. those in the core trans-European network (TEN-T)) ([ID178])
14. Please indicate if you agree with the following statements on accelerating deployment of C-ITS (when services are fully functional and EU-wide specifications are in place) : C-ITS roadside equipment should be mandated on all main interurban transport routes (i.e. those in the comprehensive trans-European network (TEN-T) ([ID179])
14. Please indicate if you agree with the following statements on accelerating deployment of C-ITS (when services are fully functional and EU-wide specifications are in place) : C-ITS roadside equipment should be mandated on all main interurban transport routes AND urban nodes (i.e. those in the comprehensive trans-European network (TEN-T) ([ID180])
15. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question.([ID181])
16. From your point of view, are there actions missing that should be considered at the EU level?([ID181])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : Investment costs for in-vehicle C-ITS equipment will be very substantial (i.e. the major part of overall costs) ([ID189])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : Investment costs for roadside C-ITS equipment will be substantial (but a minor part of overall costs) ([ID190])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : Investment costs for central C-ITS equipment (e.g. integration to national traffic management centres, software development) will form a small part of overall costs. ([ID191])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will make a strong contribution to improving road safety ([ID192])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will make a strong contribution to reducing congestion ([ID193])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will make a significant contribution to more efficient use of road infrastructure ([ID194])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will deliver a small reduction in the expenditure needed for road infrastructure (both expansion and maintenance) ([ID195])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will make a small contribution to reducing pollutant and CO2 emissions ([ID196])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will have a positive impact on international competitiveness of EU companies ([ID197])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will have a positive impact on research and innovation ([ID198])
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements : The deployment of C-ITS will support bringing new services and products to the market and thus creating new jobs ([ID199])
18. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question.([ID181])
19. From your point of view, are there any missing impacts that should be considered?([ID181])
20. Please indicate your level of agreement with this statement.([ID117])
21. Please elaborate on your answer to the previous question.([ID181])
22. What do you expect to be the main benefits to you / your organisation of substantial deployment of C-ITS? If possible, please include quantifiable examples.([ID181])
23. What do you expect to be the main costs and burdens to you / your organisation of substantial deployment of C-ITS? If possible, please include quantifiable examples.([ID181])
24. Do you have any additional comments regarding this consultation questionnaire?([ID181])
25. Please indicate any reports or other sources of information that provide evidence to support your responses. Please provide the title, author and, if available, a hyperlink to the study/report. You may also upload relevant files below.([ID181])
All Values
Apply Filter
Bulgarian
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Estonian
Finnish
French
Gaelic
German
Greek
Hungarian
Italian
Latvian
Lithuanian
Maltese
Polish
Portuguese
Romanian
Slovak
Slovenian
Spanish
Swedish
All Values
Apply Filter
can be published with your personal information (I consent the publication of all information in my contribution in whole or in part including my name or my organisation's name, and I declare that nothing within my response is unlawful or would infringe the rights of any third party in a manner that would prevent publication)
can be published provided that you remain anonymous (I consent to the publication of any information in my contribution in whole or in part (which may include quotes or opinions I express) provided that it is done anonymously. I declare that nothing within my response is unlawful or would infringe the rights of any third party in a manner that would prevent the publication)
All Values
Apply Filter
A citizen in your own personal capacity
A public authority (ministry, agency, other form of public administration, at national, regional or local level)
A private company
A start-up
An association
A non-governmental organisation
Other (please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Other
All Values
Apply Filter
National public authorities (transport ministries, agencies)
Regional or local public authorities
Road authorities
Road operators
(Public) transport operators
Vehicle and equipment manufacturers/ suppliers
ITS service providers
Telecommunications providers
Research/Academia/Consultancies
Logistics companies and integrators
Societal interests and/or consumer rights
Other (please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
Large (≥ 250 employees)
Medium (50-249 employees)
Small (10-49 employees)
Micro (1-9 employees)
Micro (self-employed)
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Very familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not at all familiar
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Absolutely essential
Very important
Moderately important
Of little importance
Not at all important
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Agree
Disagree
No opinion / I do not know
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree nor disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
No opinion / I don't know

No contribution to display no data

Rows per Page 
1
Please let us know in which language you are replying.
Note that, whatever option chosen, your answers may be subject to a request for public access to documents under Regulation (EC) N°1049/2001
May the Commission contact you, in case further details on the submitted information in this questionnaire are required?
1. Are you replying as / on behalf of:
3. Is the entity on whose behalf you are replying registered in the EU Transparency Register?
6. Please specify your country of residence
7. Please specify which interests you (the organisation on behalf of which you respond) represent:
7.a. Please specify "Other"
8. What is the size of the organisation on behalf of which you respond?
9. In addition to this general consultation, targeted follow-up will be organised with key professional stakeholders on certain topics. If you are a professional stakeholder, would you be interested in participating in this targeted consultation?
1. How familiar are you with cooperative intelligent transport systems?
2. How familiar are you with the ITS Directive and the EU actions to support the deployment of intelligent transport systems?
3. How familiar are you with the following initiatives in the area of cooperative, connected and automated mobility?
C-ITS Platform
C-ROADS Platform
GEAR2030
Horizon 2020 research activities
Letter of Intent on the testing and large scale demonstration of Connected and Automated Driving
EATA Roundtable
4. Do you agree with the assessment above?
5. Please elaborate on your answer to the previous question.
6. From your point of view, how important is the contribution of these drivers to the overall problem?
The costs of C-ITS remain too high due to the fragmented deployment of separate C-ITS services and ecosystems
Failure to establish confidence in the cyber-security of C-ITS communications
Public acceptance remains limited due to unclear principles related to privacy and protection of personal data
Incompatible communication technologies and frequency spectrum allocation
Uncertain minimum requirements for interoperability of C-ITS services
Uncertain minimum requirements for compliance assessment for C-ITS services
7. Do you consider that any drivers underlying the problem are missing? Please elaborate.
8. The Commission has established the following objectives for this initiative. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives?
Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services
Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules
Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS
Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach (combining complementary communication technologies, e.g. WiFi and cellular)
Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules
Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework (which allows services to be checked against EU-wide requirements)
9. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question. Do you consider that any objectives are missing?
10. From your point of view, how important is it to achieve these objectives through action at the EU level (as opposed to action only at the national level or international standardisation)?
Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services
Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules
Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS
Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach
Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules
Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework
11. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question.
12.a. For the objective "Ensure continuous availability of C-ITS services for users across the EU, by clearly defining a set of priority C-ITS services", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective.
Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding)
Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation)
Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS
12.b. For the objective "Ensure security of C-ITS communications by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective.
Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding)
Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation)
Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS
12.c. For the objective "Ensure the practical application of Data Protection in the area of C-ITS", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective.
Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding)
Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation)
Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS
12.d. For the objective "Ensure a forward looking hybrid communication approach", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective.
Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding)
Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation)
Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS
12.e. For the objective "Ensure interoperability of C-ITS services by establishing common rules", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective.
Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding)
Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation)
Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS
12.f. For the objective "Ensure seamless deployment of C-ITS service by establishing a compliance assessment framework (which allows services to be checked against EU-wide requirements)", please rank the types of action from most appropriate (1) to least appropriate (3) to achieve the objective.
Industry-led approach (e.g. through Memoranda of Understanding)
Soft legislation (e.g. EU guidelines and recommendations, enhanced standardisation)
Legally binding EU specifications on C-ITS
13. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question. In particular, if you favour EU action, please indicate what this needs to cover and what form it should take. Please also indicate if you think other (types of) action(s) should be considered to achieve the objectives.
14. Please indicate if you agree with the following statements on accelerating deployment of C-ITS (when services are fully functional and EU-wide specifications are in place)
Enabling conditions such as exchange of best practice and funding instruments are sufficient, thus there should be no mandatory deployment of C-ITS.
C-ITS equipment should be mandated in new vehicles
Retrofitting C-ITS equipment in existing vehicles should receive financial support
C-ITS roadside equipment should be mandated on core interurban transport routes (i.e. those in the core trans-European network (TEN-T))
C-ITS roadside equipment should be mandated on all main interurban transport routes (i.e. those in the comprehensive trans-European network (TEN-T)
C-ITS roadside equipment should be mandated on all main interurban transport routes AND urban nodes (i.e. those in the comprehensive trans-European network (TEN-T)
15. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question.
16. From your point of view, are there actions missing that should be considered at the EU level?
17. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements
Investment costs for in-vehicle C-ITS equipment will be very substantial (i.e. the major part of overall costs)
Investment costs for roadside C-ITS equipment will be substantial (but a minor part of overall costs)
Investment costs for central C-ITS equipment (e.g. integration to national traffic management centres, software development) will form a small part of overall costs.
The deployment of C-ITS will make a strong contribution to improving road safety
The deployment of C-ITS will make a strong contribution to reducing congestion
The deployment of C-ITS will make a significant contribution to more efficient use of road infrastructure
The deployment of C-ITS will deliver a small reduction in the expenditure needed for road infrastructure (both expansion and maintenance)
The deployment of C-ITS will make a small contribution to reducing pollutant and CO2 emissions
The deployment of C-ITS will have a positive impact on international competitiveness of EU companies
The deployment of C-ITS will have a positive impact on research and innovation
The deployment of C-ITS will support bringing new services and products to the market and thus creating new jobs
18. Please elaborate on your answers to the previous question.
19. From your point of view, are there any missing impacts that should be considered?
20. Please indicate your level of agreement with this statement.
21. Please elaborate on your answer to the previous question.
22. What do you expect to be the main benefits to you / your organisation of substantial deployment of C-ITS? If possible, please include quantifiable examples.
23. What do you expect to be the main costs and burdens to you / your organisation of substantial deployment of C-ITS? If possible, please include quantifiable examples.
24. Do you have any additional comments regarding this consultation questionnaire?
25. Please indicate any reports or other sources of information that provide evidence to support your responses. Please provide the title, author and, if available, a hyperlink to the study/report. You may also upload relevant files below.
1
Export
Version 1.4.4.6690 (12/07/2019 16:09)
system message icon
Export  available for download
Go to Export Page
system message icon
system message icon