EUSurvey     All public surveys   
Login | |
system message icon

Published Results: 2014-civil-drones

Export
For performance reasons you can only set a maximum of 3 filters
Please note that the questionnaire will only use your full contribution if your name, organisation (if you answer on behalf of an organisation or institution) and contact details are provided. If you choose to not provide your name, organisation and contact details, you have the option of submitting a general comment only. If you do choose to provide us with your name, organisation and contact details, you can still opt for your answers to remain anonymous when results are published.([ID1])
General comment([ID89])
1. Please specify your main field of activity or how you are mainly linked to the RPAS sector([ID34])
1a. Please specify([ID28])
2. If you work for a company, please give an indication of its size([ID29])
3. If answering as an individual, please provide your place of residence. If answering on behalf of an organisation/institution, please provide the place of establishment of the organisation/institution.([ID12])
3a. Please specify "Other"([ID2])
Please specify your main field of activity or how you are mainly linked to the RPAS sector([ID17])
11. Please indicate if your organisation is registered in the Transparency Register of the European Commission.([ID21])
12. Contributions received from this survey may be published on the European Commission's website, with the identity of the contributor. Do you agree to your contribution being published under your name?([ID13])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : RPAS technologies are already mature enough to allow for various civil applications in the next years ([ID20])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : There are substantial business opportunities and commercial benefits for the EU business from the development and use of RPAS ([ID22])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : The EU market for RPAS applications is developing slower than in other parts of the world ([ID24])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : The EU RPAS manufacturing industry is not very competitive at the moment ([ID30])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : A strong, integrated EU market is an effective means to make the EU RPAS industry globally competitive ([ID31])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : I see a potential in RPAS for professional activities in the next five years ([ID32])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : I see a potential in RPAS for daily life activities in the next five years ([ID33])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : The potential for RPAS applications in the EU is lower than in other parts of the world ([ID35])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : Demand for small RPAS with light weight and short flight distance will increase rapidly in the near future ([ID36])
1. How do you see the civil RPAS market developing? : Demand for large RPAS with heavy weight and long flight distance will increase rapidly in the near future ([ID37])
1a. Please elaborate on your answers to the above statements([ID38])
1. Overall, what is your opinion on the main problems affecting the development of the RPAS market? : The fragmentation of the RPAS market in the EU create entry barriers and negatively affect the competitiveness of EU companies ([ID47])
1. Overall, what is your opinion on the main problems affecting the development of the RPAS market? : Uncertainty about the future rules governing the development and use of RPAS hinders investment decisions ([ID57])
1. Overall, what is your opinion on the main problems affecting the development of the RPAS market? : The use of RPAS poses a threat to safety and could lead to fatal accidents ([ID58])
1. Overall, what is your opinion on the main problems affecting the development of the RPAS market? : The use of RPAS poses a threat to security because they could be used for unlawful actions ([ID59])
1. Overall, what is your opinion on the main problems affecting the development of the RPAS market? : The use of RPAS poses a threat to privacy or protection of personal data ([ID60])
1. Overall, what is your opinion on the main problems affecting the development of the RPAS market? : The current legislation does not provide effective protection against the safety, security and privacy risks linked to RPAS operations ([ID61])
1. Overall, what is your opinion on the main problems affecting the development of the RPAS market? : The current insurance regime does not sufficiently cover liability issues in case of accidents with RPAS ([ID62])
1a. Please elaborate on your answers to the above statements([ID63])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : RPAS are dangerous and should not be allowed in the EU airspace ([ID54])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : RPAS should only fly if remotely piloted by a certified operator ([ID69])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : RPAS should not be allowed to fly over city centres at low altitude ([ID70])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : The potential benefits of the RPAS applications outweigh the risks and threats they might pose ([ID71])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : The widespread use of RPAS will create a threat to safety of EU citizens on the ground ([ID72])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : The widespread use of RPAS will facilitate anonymous surveillance ([ID73])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : The widespread use of RPAS will make it difficult to ensure effective protection of privacy ([ID74])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : In order to ensure security the development of RPAS operations should be prohibited ([ID75])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : RPAS will become an additional source of emissions and noise ([ID76])
2. What is your opinion on the following concerns related to RPAS operations? : There is a substantial risk that RPAS operators are not (sufficiently) insured ([ID77])
2a. Please elaborate on your answers to the above statements([ID68])
1a. Access barriers and fragmentation of the RPAS market are the result of: : The need to obtain national authorisations in individual Member States ([ID80])
1a. Access barriers and fragmentation of the RPAS market are the result of: : Differences in national rules in various EU Member States ([ID90])
1a. Access barriers and fragmentation of the RPAS market are the result of: : Lack of common EU rules covering all types of RPAS ([ID91])
1a. Access barriers and fragmentation of the RPAS market are the result of: : Lack of mutual recognition for national certificates ([ID92])
1a. Access barriers and fragmentation of the RPAS market are the result of: : Gaps in the current EU legislation, which does not cover new concepts related to RPAS ([ID93])
1b. Legal and technological uncertainty are a result of: : Missing key technologies that need to be validated ([ID100])
1b. Legal and technological uncertainty are a result of: : Emerging and fast evolving RPAS sector cannot be rigidly regulated ([ID105])
1b. Legal and technological uncertainty are a result of: : Lack of EU or international standards ([ID106])
1c. RPAS pose a serious threat to safety, security and privacy, because: : RPAS will increase the traffic in the EU airspace ([ID113])
1c. RPAS pose a serious threat to safety, security and privacy, because: : RPAS are not able to communicate effectively with 'manned' air traffic ([ID116])
1c. RPAS pose a serious threat to safety, security and privacy, because: : RPAS are cheap and can be misused very easily even if the operations are controlled effectively ([ID117])
1c. RPAS pose a serious threat to safety, security and privacy, because: : RPAS are prone to accidents and are a danger for citizens on the ground ([ID118])
1c. RPAS pose a serious threat to safety, security and privacy, because: : There is a lack of credible information on the magnitude of the risks ([ID119])
1c. RPAS pose a serious threat to safety, security and privacy, because: : Everybody can potentially buy and use an RPAS, even if that person is not aware of aviation rules ([ID120])
1d. The ineffective protection against safety, security and privacy risks related to RPAS operations is a result of: : New threats arising from RPAS operations that cannot be easily prevented by regulations ([ID127])
1d. The ineffective protection against safety, security and privacy risks related to RPAS operations is a result of: : The absence of regulations which properly and sufficiently cover RPAS activities and related threats ([ID133])
1d. The ineffective protection against safety, security and privacy risks related to RPAS operations is a result of: : The difficulty to actually implement and enforce current regulations ([ID134])
1e. Inadequate insurance regime is a result of: : The current rules were conceived for manned aircraft ([ID141])
1e. Inadequate insurance regime is a result of: : The lack of harmonised operational rules ([ID144])
1e. Inadequate insurance regime is a result of: : There is not sufficient evidence to calculate the risk and hence the cost of insurance ([ID145])
1f. Please elaborate on your answers to the above statements([ID146])
1. What should be the main EU policy objectives in relation to RPAS? : RPAS should be promoted at the EU level because they are a promising source for jobs and growth and will offer new services to citizens and businesses ([ID154])
1. What should be the main EU policy objectives in relation to RPAS? : Citizens should be protected from risks and concerns related to safety, security or privacy of RPAS ([ID157])
1a. Please elaborate on your answers to the above statements([ID158])
1. To what extent do you agree with the following options to address the problems affecting the EU RPAS market? : Option 1: No additional action is needed at the EU level at this moment of time ([ID167])
1. To what extent do you agree with the following options to address the problems affecting the EU RPAS market? : Option 2: EU should regulate RPAS where it has already competences (i.e. above 150 kg) and leave smaller RPAS for Member State legislation ([ID169])
1. To what extent do you agree with the following options to address the problems affecting the EU RPAS market? : Option 3: EU should amend the safety legislation to cover all RPAS regardless of weight, but proportional to the risk associated with the specific RPAS operations. The implementation of the common rules would mostly remain at the Member State level ([ID170])
1. To what extent do you agree with the following options to address the problems affecting the EU RPAS market? : Option 4: EU should amend the safety legislation to cover all RPAS regardless of weight, and EASA would manage the certification of RPAS, not the national authorities ([ID171])
1a. Please elaborate on your replies and/or suggest any additional options to be considered (including proposals for different packaging of measures in the options)([ID172])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : The market is still not mature enough and should not be regulated yet ([ID179])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : The rules should be developed at international level (i.e. by ICAO) and not by the EU ([ID184])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : EU rules should reflect international developments and standards ([ID185])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : Before any regulation is proposed there is a need for validation of technologies and development of recognised standards ([ID186])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : Current EASA safety rules sufficiently cover larger RPAS (above 150kg) and do not need to be changed ([ID187])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : EU should only propose safety rules for heavy RPAS (above 150kg), while small RPAS should remain under a national competence ([ID188])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : Safety rules should be harmonized at the EU level, but need to be implemented by national authorities ([ID189])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : EASA should become the central institution for certification and implementation ([ID190])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : Too detailed rules should not be proposed as they would suffocate the newly emerging industry ([ID191])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : Certification and licencing of lighter RPAS operations is best performed at local level ([ID192])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : Companies should have the possibility to choose the certificating authority which may be European or national ([ID193])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : All types of RPAS, regardless of weight, should require airworthiness certification, operator certification and (remote) pilot licensing ([ID194])
2a. Rulemaking and division of competencies : Certificates and licenses delivered somewhere in the EU should be recognised throughout the EU ([ID195])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : RPAS should only be allowed to fly when separated from manned air traffic (i.e. in segregated airspace) ([ID202])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : The risk of an operation depends besides the weight also on the speed of the aircraft ([ID215])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : The risk of an operation depends besides the weight of the aircraft also on the reliability of the system ([ID216])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : The risk of an operation depends besides the weight of the aircraft also on the place where operations take place ([ID217])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : The risk of an operation depends besides the weight of the aircraft also on the type of operation ([ID218])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : The risk of an operation depends besides the weight of the aircraft also on the quality of the RPAS operator ([ID219])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : The focus of safety rules, at least for lighter RPAS below 150 kg, should lie upon the operator and to a lesser extent the aircraft ([ID220])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : A strong safety management system of the operator should be introduced as the most effective tool to guarantee safety ([ID221])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : RPAS operations should be authorised at a local level, taking into account local circumstances. ([ID222])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : The level of regulatory control of RPAS vehicles and operations should be proportionate to risk ([ID223])
2b. Mitigation of safety risks : EASA should develop a common risk classification scheme ([ID224])
2c. Mitigation of security risks : Security can be effectively enforced under the current rules ([ID232])
2c. Mitigation of security risks : Eliminating gaps in the safety regulation will also allow better control of security risks and no additional security specific changes would be needed ([ID243])
2c. Mitigation of security risks : EASA should integrate security considerations in its rules on RPAS ([ID244])
2d. Mitigation of privacy risks : The experience with Google Street View demonstrates that the existing data protection legislation should sufficiently protect data, derived from RPAS operations ([ID251])
2d. Mitigation of privacy risks : New specific measures are necessary to ensure privacy protection in the case of commercial use of RPAS ([ID254])
2d. Mitigation of privacy risks : New specific measures are necessary to ensure privacy protection in the case of use of RPAS by police or security forces ([ID255])
2d. Mitigation of privacy risks : Data protection legislation needs to be strengthened at the EU level if civil use of RPAS is allowed ([ID256])
2d. Mitigation of privacy risks : National data protection authorities should identify privacy threats related to the applications of RPAS and develop adequate protection measures where necessary ([ID257])
2d. Mitigation of privacy risks : National civil aviation authorities should share information with data protection authorities in order to ensure privacy protection ([ID258])
2d. Mitigation of privacy risks : The ability to identify an operator of an RPAS is a key aspect of ensuring privacy protection ([ID259])
2f. Would you like to comment or add any other measure that could improve the current regulatory system for RPAS?([ID274])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EU businesses ([ID88])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Compliance and administrative costs for national administrations ([ID101])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EASA ([ID102])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Employment ([ID103])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : RPAS market growth ([ID104])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS operators globally ([ID114])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS manufacturers globally ([ID115])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Innovation in the RPAS sector ([ID128])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Security of the EU airspace ([ID129])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Safety in the EU airspace ([ID130])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Safety of citizens on the ground ([ID131])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Privacy protection ([ID132])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Citizens' trust in RPAS operations ([ID142])
1. How do you assess the possible impacts of the first policy option (no new actions)? : Natural environment ([ID143])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EU businesses ([ID240])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Compliance and administrative costs for national administrations ([ID241])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EASA ([ID242])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Employment ([ID252])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : RPAS market growth ([ID253])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS operators globally ([ID267])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS manufacturers globally ([ID268])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Innovation in the RPAS sector ([ID269])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Security of the EU airspace ([ID270])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Safety in the EU airspace ([ID271])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Safety of citizens on the ground ([ID272])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Privacy protection ([ID276])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Citizens' trust in RPAS operations ([ID277])
2. How do you assess the possible impacts of the second policy option (adopting EU safety rules above 150 kg)? : Natural environment ([ID278])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EU businesses ([ID285])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Compliance and administrative costs for national administrations ([ID286])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EASA ([ID287])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Employment ([ID288])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : RPAS market growth ([ID289])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS operators globally ([ID290])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS manufacturers globally ([ID291])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Innovation in the RPAS sector ([ID292])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Security of the EU airspace ([ID293])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Safety in the EU airspace ([ID294])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Safety of citizens on the ground ([ID295])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Privacy protection ([ID296])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Citizens' trust in RPAS operations ([ID297])
3. How do you assess the possible impacts of the third policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS)? : Natural environment ([ID298])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EU businesses ([ID305])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Compliance and administrative costs for national administrations ([ID306])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Compliance and administrative costs for EASA ([ID307])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Employment ([ID308])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : RPAS market growth ([ID309])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS operators globally ([ID310])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Competitiveness of the EU RPAS manufacturers globally ([ID311])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Innovation in the RPAS sector ([ID312])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Security of the EU airspace ([ID313])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Safety in the EU airspace ([ID314])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Safety of citizens on the ground ([ID315])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Privacy protection ([ID316])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Citizens' trust in RPAS operations ([ID317])
4. How do you assess the possible impacts of the fourth policy option (adopting EU safety rules for all RPAS, giving new certification competences to EASA and central oversight)? : Natural environment ([ID318])
5. Please describe in more details any of the identified impacts and/or indicate any other impacts of the policy options or their measures. Please provide your assessment of these impacts.([ID319])
1. Are there any other issues you would like to highlight in relation to this initiative?([ID321])
2. Please give reference to any studies or documents that you think are of relevance for this consultation, with links for online download where possible([ID322])
3. You may also upload any document relevant for this consultation([ID323])
All Values
Apply Filter
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details
No, I prefer to provide a general comment only (and questionnaire ends here)
All Values
Apply Filter
An individual
Aviation professional (working in the aviation industry as a pilot, crew member, controller, etc.)
RPAS operator
Commercial Air Transport operator
Business Aviation operator
Recreational aviation operator
Aerial work operator
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance
Air navigation service provider
Aerodrome operator
National regulator
Qualified entity, or other organisation officially recognized by the national authority
Training organisation for aviation professionals
EU institution/body
Stakeholder/industry association
Research organisation/university/consultancy
Other (please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)
small enterprise (employs fewer than 50 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 10 million)
medium-sized enterprise (employs fewer than 250 persons and whose annual turnover does not exceed EUR 50 million or whose annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 43 million)
large enterprise
All Values
Apply Filter
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Iceland
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Slovakia
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Other
All Values
Apply Filter
An individual
Aviation professional (working in the aviation industry as a pilot, crew member, controller, etc.)
RPAS operator
Commercial Air Transport operator
Business Aviation operator
Recreational aviation operator
Aerial work operator
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance
Air navigation service provider
Aerodrome operator
National regulator
Qualified entity, or other organisation officially recognized by the national authority
Training organisation for aviation professionals
EU institution/body
Stakeholder/industry association
Research organisation/university/consultancy
Other (please specify)
All Values
Apply Filter
My contribution may be published under the name indicated
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous
I do not wish any of my contributions to be published
All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
Strongly disagree
Disagree
Agree

Strongly agree

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

All Values
Apply Filter
No impact
Negative impact
Mixed impact
Positive impact

No opinion

Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
Trimble, manufacturer of small RPAS for geospatial and agricultural applications
large enterprise([ID33])
Other([ID40])
USA
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
The use of small RPAS will become another tool for a large pool of professionals.
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
 
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Disagree([ID96])
Disagree([ID96])
Agree([ID97])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Disagree([ID109])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Agree([ID124])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Agree([ID124])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Agree([ID138])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Strongly agree([ID152])
 
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Strongly agree([ID165])
 
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
No opinion([ID178])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID198])
Strongly disagree([ID197])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Positive impact([ID283])
Negative impact([ID281])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Other (please specify)([ID27])
IABG
large enterprise([ID33])
France([ID17])
IABG
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
 
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
 
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
 
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
 
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID96])
Disagree([ID96])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
 
Agree([ID151])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Agree([ID164])
Agree([ID164])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
No impact([ID235])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID280])
Negative impact([ID281])
Negative impact([ID281])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
No impact([ID280])
Positive impact([ID283])
No impact([ID280])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
No impact([ID300])
Positive impact([ID303])
No impact([ID300])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Other (please specify)([ID27])
Answering as an individual with regard to my work in a university
large enterprise([ID33])
Germany([ID18])
Other
Other (please specify)([ID27])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
 
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
No opinion([ID26])
I think the use of RPAS technologies can be applied widely for both commercial and research undertakings. I believe they have a lot to offer and could prove an integral part of operations by providing data not easily obtained otherwise.
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
No opinion([ID46])
No opinion([ID46])
I believe that the use of RPAS poses no added threat to privacy or security that other aviation means already pose. Safety issues are largely dependent on the size of the RPAS. I do not believe that small RPAS pose a threat to safety.
Strongly disagree([ID49])
No opinion([ID53])
No opinion([ID53])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Disagree([ID50])
No opinion([ID53])
No opinion([ID53])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
No opinion([ID53])
I believe that the benefits of using RPAS far outweigh their potential disadvantages. RPAS may be sources of emissions and noise but they are likely less than for alternatives (such as airplane surveys).
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
No opinion([ID99])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID110])
No opinion([ID112])
No opinion([ID112])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Strongly agree([ID111])
No opinion([ID126])
No opinion([ID126])
No opinion([ID126])
No opinion([ID140])
No opinion([ID140])
No opinion([ID140])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Agree([ID151])
 
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Strongly agree([ID165])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
No opinion([ID178])
No opinion([ID178])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
No opinion([ID178])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
No opinion([ID201])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID198])
No opinion([ID201])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
No opinion([ID231])
No opinion([ID231])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
No opinion([ID250])
No opinion([ID250])
 
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID239])
No impact([ID235])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Negative impact([ID236])
No opinion([ID239])
Negative impact([ID281])
No impact([ID280])
Negative impact([ID281])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
No opinion([ID284])
Mixed impact([ID302])
No impact([ID300])
Negative impact([ID301])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
No opinion([ID304])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
RPAS System Designer, Manufacturer, Trainer
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Other([ID40])
South Africa
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
No opinion([ID26])
No opinion([ID26])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
No opinion([ID26])
No opinion([ID26])
 
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Strongly agree([ID45])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly agree([ID52])
 
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID64])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID97])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Agree([ID138])
Disagree([ID137])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Strongly agree([ID165])
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Strongly disagree([ID162])
 
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
Design and Manufacturing entity
large enterprise([ID33])
Other([ID40])
South Africa
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
The EU is in the main on par with the international technological pace, in some cases ahead thereof.
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
The current security architecture policy is rather lax or non-existent within the UAV regulatory space.
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
The foray of data will become a natural point of discussion within the data security narrative.
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID64])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID97])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Agree([ID138])
Structures around insurance can only be implemented once the regulatory standardisation is in place.
Strongly agree([ID152])
Agree([ID151])
There is robust economic benefit to the civilian use of RPAS within the sphere of any state context.
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Agree([ID164])
Agree([ID164])
Disagree([ID163])
Certain RPAS class types should be reserved to a user-discretion approach by the NAA's.
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID229])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Disagree([ID247])
Strongly agree([ID249])
 
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
 
 
JARUS-org V0.17
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Aviation professional (working in the aviation industry as a pilot, crew member, controller, etc.)([ID15])
RPAS certification specialist
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
United Kingdom([ID39])
?
Aviation professional (working in the aviation industry as a pilot, crew member, controller, etc.)([ID15])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
No opinion([ID26])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
At present their are no larger platforms capable of providing operators with the benefits that larger RPAS can bring such as maritime patrol and fire fighting etc. At present AeroSynergy Certification has a large customer desperate for a long endurance twin engine RPAS. (Flying over the ocean will need a twin engined aircraft.) In all of my 8 years experience with RPAS I have seen far to much talking and not enough entrepreneurial action get get restricted TC RPAS flying and generating commercial revenue. It is commercial RPAS flights initially over the safety of the seas and providing close fire fighting support that will see the true benefit of larger RPAS.
No opinion([ID46])
Disagree([ID43])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Agree([ID44])
No opinion([ID46])
No opinion([ID46])
The use of the term 'safety' and 'threat' are what is holding the industry back. An RPAS correctly certificated through EASA even with restrictions should be as safe an any other aircraft in the same weight class. i.e. the safety thread as used by by the uninformed will hold back RPAS development in the EU.
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
No opinion([ID53])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
The statement used below is very leading and should not have been asked. "The potential benefits of the RPAS applications outweigh the risks and threats they might pose". It is this kind of leading statement that holds the industry back as it cannot be answered by and agree or disagree as it is so one sided. Other statements above are also misleading.
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID64])
Disagree([ID64])
Disagree([ID96])
Disagree([ID96])
Disagree([ID96])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID123])
Disagree([ID123])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Disagree([ID137])
Once again the above questions asked are in the absolute such as "will". Their is an awful lot that is not being asked. Just imagine we are in 1920 and asking the same questions about emerging manned aircraft! The questions as posed appear to be somewhat distant from the reality of the accepted international rules of the air.
Agree([ID151])
Agree([ID151])
"Citizens should be protected from risks and concerns related to safety, security or privacy of RPAS*" The same goes for manned aircraft as well therefore RPAS should be correctly civil certificated along with its operators as are manned aircraft. We should stop trying to find ways of trying to make RPAS somehow different from manned aircraft in terms of safety and security.
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Agree([ID164])
Once again the questions appear to only relate to small RPAS. Larger RPAS will be certificated by EASA. Options 3 and 4, but mainly 3 can be the only sensible way forward. You only have to look at some of the member state RPAS laws to realise what a huge differentiation in regulations there is. EASA is the body that should set the basic rules.
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID198])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID229])
Disagree([ID228])
Disagree([ID228])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Once again, please ask yourself the same questions but substitute the words 'manned aircraft' for 'RPAS' instead. With this done you might realise that some of the questions are somewhat meaningless.
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No opinion([ID87])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
Positive impact([ID86])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
Positive impact([ID283])
No impact([ID280])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
No opinion([ID284])
No impact([ID280])
No impact([ID280])
No opinion([ID284])
No opinion([ID284])
Positive impact([ID283])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
No opinion([ID304])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No opinion([ID304])
No opinion([ID304])
Positive impact([ID303])
The EU needs one set of guiding rules and regulations. These should all be based on the common rules of the air. The EU should not legislate for legislations sake. If National NAA's are to be allowed to certificate RPAS (and most do not have the capability anyway) that NAA should be licensed to operate under some form of Qualified entity to EASA. This should equally apply to competent organisations that seek QE status.
The questions should have first been circulated amongst industry professionals to ensure a level of quality and relevance that appears to be missing from some of those above.
Obviously the JARUS group, however the specific JARUS AMC RPAS.1309 and its scoping documentation answers a lot of those questions posed above and also those that have not been asked.
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
RPAS manufacturer
small enterprise (employs fewer than 50 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 10 million)([ID31])
Germany([ID18])
Germany
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
 
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Disagree([ID43])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Currently mainly small civil UAVs are used. So our expirience is only valid for this area. Safety thread: Small UAVs are unmanned and have a very low impact mass. Although even a few kg can lead to a fatal accident this is already a very unlikely case. This can be shown even by our own company statistics: We sold more than 1000 civil UAVs with under 5kg TOW. These UAVs have an average flight time of 30-50h. So within 30-50 thousand hours of flight we only had scratched fingers (would be a minor accident in CS-23 aircrafts) and no 3rd party liability claims. So we can show by statistics that our systems already are at the same level for minor incidents as a CS-23 aircraft! However it is important to note, that a loss of vehicle is not a catastrophic event! In most cases only the vehicle is broken! Privacy and protection of personal data should be clearly regulated. However RPAS user, which are be definition professional users, need to earn money with the job. They can't sell illegal data, so they have naturally no interest disobeying privacy.
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
 
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
 
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID64])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly disagree([ID56])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
 
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly disagree([ID122])
Disagree([ID123])
Strongly agree([ID125])
 
 
 
1c) The potential misuse is more in the area of model flying or even toy systems. Professional users want to have training and get it. So they also have a good knowledge about the operation and the system. 1d) Enforement is very important. Currently in the countries were rules are in place they are only enforced by the insurance companies in case of an accident with 3rd party claim (which is extremly rare with small UAVs)
Strongly agree([ID152])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Strongly agree([ID165])
Disagree([ID163])
In general it is good to have common rules. From the general aviation the expiriences with common rules from the EU are very bad though. The general aviation for small aircrafts was so much overregulated in the last years that only with Ultralights there is a chance to fly small aircrafts with a good balance between risk and regulation. Therefore I would agree to Option 3, but make sure that there is only a basic regulation in place which leaves room for the individual member states to refine that according to their needs. Do everything to find a good balance between risk and regulation, especially at small TOW below 25kg. If this can not be assured, leave the TOW below 150kg or 25kg to the member states and let the rules and markets regulate for themselves for 10 years. Then take the expirience and make good rules for lower weights.
Agree([ID176])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID197])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Disagree([ID198])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly disagree([ID197])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
2b) As smaller the aircraft as less important is the aircraft safety and as more important the pilot and the type of operation gets.
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Positive impact([ID86])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
No opinion([ID87])
Negative impact([ID236])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
No opinion([ID239])
Negative impact([ID281])
Positive impact([ID283])
Negative impact([ID281])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
No opinion([ID284])
Negative impact([ID301])
Positive impact([ID303])
Negative impact([ID301])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
3) and 4) If the EU doesn't overregulate the RPAS! Otherwise it can be a total shutdown (like Jarus RPAS AMC1309 proposed) which would be the worst which can happen!
 
www.asctec.de for
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
An individual([ID14])
n/a
 
Portugal([ID32])
Portugal
An individual([ID14])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
No opinion([ID26])
Disagree([ID18])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
 
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
 
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Agree([ID51])
 
 
Disagree([ID64])
Disagree([ID64])
No opinion([ID67])
Agree([ID65])
Strongly disagree([ID95])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Disagree([ID96])
Agree([ID110])
No opinion([ID112])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
 
 
 
 
Strongly disagree([ID149])
Strongly agree([ID152])
 
 
 
Agree([ID164])
 
 
Strongly disagree([ID174])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
 
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Agree([ID176])
 
Strongly disagree([ID174])
 
Strongly disagree([ID174])
 
Strongly disagree([ID174])
 
Disagree([ID198])
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Strongly disagree([ID227])
 
 
Strongly disagree([ID246])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
 
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
No opinion([ID87])
No impact([ID83])
 
 
 
 
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
Member of Land surveying company team interested in using RPAS
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Bulgaria([ID2])
N/A
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
In our sector we have already seen a wide increase of RPAS use for various mapping and photogrametry tasks, although not on a large scale projects since the use of bigger long range UAV planes for commersial activities for instance is a bit problematic.
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Of course the insurance industry would have to adjust to the RPAS, but it has done that several times in the past few decades so I can't see any problem here.
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
 
Disagree([ID64])
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID64])
Disagree([ID64])
Agree([ID65])
Strongly disagree([ID95])
Strongly disagree([ID95])
Strongly disagree([ID95])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID122])
Strongly disagree([ID122])
Strongly disagree([ID122])
Disagree([ID137])
Disagree([ID137])
Disagree([ID137])
 
Agree([ID151])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
 
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
 
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
RPAS operator([ID16])
Owner and PIC of AiroboticsGEO bv
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Netherlands([ID29])
Free enterprise
RPAS operator([ID16])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
The short endurance/flight distance RPAS are enough developed for the work they do. The main effort must go toe RPAS weighing less than 25 kg and having an endurance of more than 5 flight hours and can cover distances of 50 km and more. These BLOS RPAS Light are the real market and are able to provide the required services. Long endurance is needed to be able to operate economically.
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Privacy is only an issue to politicians and lawyers how have not the faintest idea what you can do with an RPAS. Regulation is needed to operate RPAS responsible and safely, there fore it is needed that a real professional training is given (not the EuroUSC which is a cinch) along the line of private pilot training.
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
With a good set of regulations these concerns can be cornered.
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID122])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly disagree([ID136])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Strongly agree([ID152])
 
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Disagree([ID163])
Strongly agree([ID165])
 
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID197])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID228])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
 
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
 
I think better cooperation between all parties is needed. Now only the best known companies and organizations are involved, but it would be wise to integrate also smaller organizations.
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
Onera
medium-sized enterprise (employs fewer than 250 persons and whose annual turnover does not exceed EUR 50 million or whose annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 43 million)([ID32])
France([ID17])
France
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Significant technological, regulatory, and management barriers exist to safely integrate UAS into the airspace, this is a strong showstopper for applications other than VLOS flight over non-populated areas.
No opinion([ID46])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
The 3 questions about the use of RPAS may be misleading. My opinion concerns only current RPAS that have been designed without any standard and may be operated without any well-defined and agreed regulatory framework
Agree([ID51])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
No opinion([ID53])
Disagree([ID50])
No opinion([ID53])
As for the previous section, questions are very general. The widespread use of RPAS should not be dangerous, then RPAS should be designed and built according to safety standards. R&D is still necessary to develop technologies to overcome this issue. The same comment applies for RPAS operations. A regulatory framework has to be defined to ensure privacy and operators will have to comply with this framework, if they do not, they have to be prosecuted.
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Disagree([ID96])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Agree([ID124])
Strongly agree([ID125])
 
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Strongly agree([ID139])
 
Agree([ID151])
Strongly agree([ID152])
First issue should be "Safe and secure RPAS should be..."
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
My agreement is based on experience. We can start with option 2 knowing that some kind of a no man's and could exist between small RPAS (up to 80 - 100 kg) and larger one (above 1 ton). Option 3 and 4 will bring a lot of bureaucracy - they have to be started right now, in parallel with option 2, to give some results in the 2030 time frame!
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
No opinion([ID178])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
No opinion([ID178])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID198])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID228])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
No impact([ID235])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID281])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
ATyges Ingeniería
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Spain([ID35])
Other
Aircraft design, manufacturing, or maintenance([ID15])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
 
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
The problems never is techonoly, always is people who use it. It's GPS tecnology bad or is a great contributions to the progress?
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
 
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID123])
Disagree([ID123])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
 
Agree([ID151])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
Strongly agree([ID165])
Disagree([ID163])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID197])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
 
 
Disagree([ID198])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Negative impact([ID236])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Negative impact([ID281])
No impact([ID280])
Negative impact([ID281])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID281])
Mixed impact([ID282])
 
Mixed impact([ID282])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID301])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Mixed impact([ID302])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Qualified entity, or other organisation officially recognized by the national authority([ID20])
http://www.eurousc-italia.it/
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Italy([ID23])
Qualified entity
Qualified entity, or other organisation officially recognized by the national authority([ID20])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Today experience shows that current civil drones are mostly below 25 kg and operated i at very low level, in visual line-of-sIght. However the size, range and performances will inevitably increase in parallel with market development not excluding passenger transport (e.g. for emergency rescue or for touristic flights on board tethered balloons) and not excluding optionally piloted aircraft or aircraft (e.g. for long range freight transport) with part of the crew on board and part on the ground..... providing that these developments are not jeopardised by lack of safe rules, which have also to be common, proportionate and cost-efficient to allow defintion of profitable business cases for investors.
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Agree([ID44])
safety, security and liability are obvious concerns also for manned aviation. No wonder that these concerns exist also for RPAS. Operational limitations, stricter at beginning, can mitigate such risks under the responsiblity of the RPAS operator.
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly agree([ID52])
More precise rules are need for aeronautical insurance of RPAS operators. Rules on privacy also exist, but they have to be linked to the responsibilities of the operators (i.e. the organisation, not the remote pilot). In the simplest cases (e.g. RPAS below 2 kg operated at very low level and low speed far from people and aerodromes) a simple legal warning on the packaging may suffice. One step beyond (in terms opf societal risk) only the RPAS operator certificate (ROC) would suffice, being the operator responsible for the safety assessment (including the system and possibly supported by a qualified entity), for the OPS manual (containing limitations) and for the competence of the remote crew.
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID97])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Agree([ID97])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly disagree([ID122])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Agree([ID124])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Current rules have been developed for manned aviation. Of course "squeezing" RPAS into tehm is not easy, since the RPAS operations are radically different
Strongly agree([ID152])
Strongly agree([ID152])
Market development, job creation and protection of citizens (inclduing for privacy) are all important and need to be progressed simultaneously, with sufficent public debate and political decisions, to ensure the widest possible consensus for cautious, gradual and safe introduction of RPAS in non-segregate airspace and in urban areas. Full access may only be achieved in the long term.
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Strongly agree([ID165])
Disagree([ID163])
For proximity reasons (i.e. language, travel and fees) certificaiton of RPAS below 150 kg, although based on common rules, could be left to individual member states, supported by qualified entities as necessary. This distribution of highly qualified jobs across the continent (and the neighbouring islands) would also increase the social cohesion of the Union and spread the economic benefits.
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID197])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly disagree([ID227])
Strongly disagree([ID227])
Strongly agree([ID230])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
According to Articles 1 and 2 of the Chicago Convention, ICAO develops international standards, but legislation is left to States (individually or, like in the EU, collectively). Essential requirments attached to Regulation 216/2008 are technology independent = they can be adopted now. Implementing rules define regulatory processes (e.g. certification) roles, responsibilities and privileges of personnel and organisation = they are also technology independent. Standards for technical systems (data link, detect and avoid, etc.) can be developed by industry and of course they will evolve with the state of the art. RPAS insurance should in principle cover aviation risks; however more work is necessary to collect suffient information to allow insurance companies to better assess the real risks. Insurers should consider whether the operator is certified or not, since the ROC (and the associated OPS Manual and safety management) reduce the risk.
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Negative impact([ID301])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
Article 13 of Regulation 216/2008 needs amendment, to allow industry, operators and individuals to contract directly accredited qualified entity, as it already happens in several EU Member States. The reports or recommendations issued by the qualifieid entity could be useful to insurance companies, but also to competent authorities in oprder to reduce the workload on the latter, before issuing certificates, approvals or licenses.
EC should consult society, including qualified entities, before adopting any legislative proposal on the matter.
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
Graz University of Technology
 
Austria([ID13])
Graz
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
 
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Interesting applications: environmental monitoring (glaciers, rock glaciers, landslides, small habitats, etc.), archeology, infrastructure, buildings, cultural heritage, monitoring of forests
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
No opinion([ID53])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
No opinion([ID53])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
 
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
No opinion([ID67])
Disagree([ID96])
Agree([ID97])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Agree([ID110])
No opinion([ID112])
No opinion([ID112])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
 
Disagree([ID123])
Disagree([ID123])
No opinion([ID140])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
 
Agree([ID151])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Strongly agree([ID165])
Disagree([ID163])
 
Disagree([ID175])
No opinion([ID178])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
No opinion([ID178])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
No opinion([ID231])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Strongly agree([ID249])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
 
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
No opinion([ID239])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
 
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
RPAS operator([ID16])
Visual Air Productions (Pty) Ltd
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Other([ID40])
South Africa
RPAS operator([ID16])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published but should be kept anonymous([ID15])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
 
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
 
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Agree([ID138])
Strongly disagree([ID136])
We have been operating RPAS's for 16 years with over 35000 flights with a 100% safety record
Agree([ID151])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Disagree([ID163])
Strongly disagree([ID162])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID198])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Negative impact([ID281])
Negative impact([ID281])
Negative impact([ID281])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Other (please specify)([ID27])
Aerospace consultant
 
Italy([ID23])
Aerospace onsultant
Other (please specify)([ID27])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
 
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
Agree([ID44])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
 
Disagree([ID64])
Disagree([ID64])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID65])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Disagree([ID109])
 
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Disagree([ID137])
 
Agree([ID151])
Agree([ID151])
 
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Disagree([ID163])
Strongly agree([ID165])
Strongly agree([ID165])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
 
Positive impact([ID238])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
 
 
 
EU Roadmap designed by the RPAS Steering Group ULTRA documents
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
RPAS operator([ID16])
Remote sensing and phtogrammetry
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Spain([ID35])
Spain
RPAS operator([ID16])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
 
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
 
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Strongly disagree([ID122])
Agree([ID124])
Disagree([ID123])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Agree([ID138])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Strongly agree([ID152])
 
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Strongly agree([ID165])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
No opinion([ID178])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID198])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID230])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
No impact([ID235])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID235])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
No impact([ID280])
No impact([ID280])
No impact([ID280])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
No impact([ID300])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
An individual([ID14])
private consultant planning to set up a commercial service in agriculture using RPAS
 
Belgium([ID14])
-
RPAS operator([ID16])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
 
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
 
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID123])
Disagree([ID123])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Disagree([ID150])
 
Strongly disagree([ID162])
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
Strongly agree([ID165])
identify EU common rules in coordination with extra-european national/international authorities (i.e. USA, Japan, Canada, Cina, South Africa, Brazil, etc.) so that future EU certifications could be recognised also abroad
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly disagree([ID246])
Disagree([ID247])
Disagree([ID247])
No opinion([ID250])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly agree([ID249])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
No opinion([ID87])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Negative impact([ID236])
Mixed impact([ID237])
No impact([ID235])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
No impact([ID235])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
No opinion([ID239])
No impact([ID235])
Mixed impact([ID237])
No impact([ID235])
No opinion([ID284])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID281])
No impact([ID280])
No impact([ID280])
No impact([ID280])
Positive impact([ID283])
No impact([ID280])
Positive impact([ID283])
Positive impact([ID283])
Mixed impact([ID282])
No impact([ID280])
Positive impact([ID283])
No impact([ID280])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Positive impact([ID303])
Negative impact([ID301])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
Positive impact([ID303])
Positive impact([ID303])
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
RPAS operator([ID16])
RPAS OPERATOR
 
Italy([ID23])
PIACENZA
RPAS operator([ID16])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
 
Agree([ID44])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly disagree([ID42])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Disagree([ID43])
 
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
 
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
No opinion([ID99])
Agree([ID97])
Agree([ID97])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Disagree([ID109])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
No opinion([ID126])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Strongly agree([ID152])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
No opinion([ID166])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
No opinion([ID231])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Disagree([ID247])
Agree([ID248])
 
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
No opinion([ID87])
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
RPAS operator([ID16])
I provide a 3d Surveying service using RPAS
micro-enterprise (employs fewer than 10 persons and whose annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total does not exceed EUR 2 million)([ID30])
Ireland([ID22])
I work for my own company, RPAS Ireland
RPAS operator([ID16])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly disagree([ID16])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
RPAS Ireland have been applying both fixed wing and rotor wing RPAS combined with GIS technology to provide the Irish Market with better quality survey data quicker, cheaper and safer than current conventional ground survey methods.
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
The fragmentation of the EU market place, is because of a non harmonised RPAS regularory approach. It's like a truck driver having to get a different license each time he passes through a national border within the eu. it certainly represents a barrier to intra EU member state trade for RPAS service providers within the EU
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
The benefits of RPAS mapping should be facilitated to fly over urban areas. These are the areas that we want to protect from natural disasters, manage traffic flows, water and sewage schemes ect. This is exactly where RPAS can benefit society most, by mapping city centres.
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Strongly agree([ID98])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Agree([ID110])
Agree([ID110])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Strongly agree([ID125])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
Strongly agree([ID139])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Strongly agree([ID152])
To harmonise a high quality EU approved RPAS flight and Ground Training schools that all train to the same high standard. This way you reduce risk and increase trade.
Agree([ID164])
Agree([ID164])
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
 
Disagree([ID175])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
 
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Disagree([ID228])
Agree([ID229])
Strongly agree([ID230])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Positive impact([ID86])
Positive impact([ID86])
Negative impact([ID236])
No impact([ID235])
No impact([ID235])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Positive impact([ID238])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
 
No impact([ID280])
No impact([ID280])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID281])
Negative impact([ID281])
Negative impact([ID281])
Negative impact([ID281])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Mixed impact([ID282])
Negative impact([ID301])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
No impact([ID300])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Negative impact([ID301])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
Mixed impact([ID302])
 
 
http://www.rpas.ie/images/Uploads/Published-White-Paper-on-RPAS-Photogrammetry.pdf
Yes, I will provide my name and contact details([ID2])
 
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
RPAS lecturer/researcher
 
Belgium([ID14])
Oostende
Research organisation/university/consultancy([ID26])
No([ID15])
My contribution may be published under the name indicated([ID14])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Disagree([ID18])
Agree([ID19])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Disagree([ID18])
Strongly agree([ID25])
Agree([ID19])
 
Strongly agree([ID45])
Strongly agree([ID45])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Disagree([ID43])
Agree([ID44])
Education is essential to create a general "safety habit" as it is in other aviation branches such as airliners or general aviation. It's the easiest and quickest way to show what the risks are when operating a RPAS.
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Strongly agree([ID52])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
Agree([ID51])
Strongly disagree([ID49])
Disagree([ID50])
Agree([ID51])
It must be made clear to the operators that the choice of RPAS is essential for the required safety level. e.g. you don't drive with a tracktor on a highway. The physics of a quadcopter teaches you that, when 1 engine fails, the RPAS will crash. This means that a quadcopter isn't suitable to fly over crowds but it can be used for agricultural inspections.
Agree([ID65])
Strongly agree([ID66])
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID64])
Agree([ID65])
Disagree([ID96])
Agree([ID97])
Disagree([ID96])
Disagree([ID109])
Strongly disagree([ID108])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Disagree([ID109])
Disagree([ID109])
Strongly agree([ID111])
Agree([ID124])
Disagree([ID123])
Agree([ID124])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
Agree([ID138])
 
Strongly agree([ID152])
Agree([ID151])
 
Disagree([ID163])
Disagree([ID163])
Agree([ID164])
Agree([ID164])
 
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Disagree([ID175])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
No opinion([ID178])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID175])
Agree([ID176])
Agree([ID176])
Strongly disagree([ID174])
Strongly agree([ID177])
Agree([ID176])
Disagree([ID198])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Agree([ID199])
Strongly agree([ID200])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID229])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Strongly disagree([ID246])
No opinion([ID250])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
Agree([ID248])
 
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Negative impact([ID84])
No impact([ID83])
No impact([ID83])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID84])
Mixed impact([ID85])
Negative impact([ID236])
Negative impact([ID236])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Negative impact([ID236])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
No opinion([ID239])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID237])
Mixed impact([ID282])