Young people - social inclusion

This is the stable Version.

Revision as of 14:45, 28 January 2020 by Rosswen (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Data extracted in December 2019.

Planned article update: February 2021.

Highlights

In 2018, the rate of young people aged 16-29 years at risk of poverty or social exclusion in the EU was 26.3 %, or 20.6 million young people, with women at slightly higher risk than men.

In 2018, 9.4 % of people aged 16-29 years in the EU lived in households with very low work intensity.

Between 2012 and 2018, the severe material deprivation rate for young people aged 16-29 years in the EU fell from 11.7 % to 6.8 %.


Source: Eurostat: (ilc_lvps08)

This article presents statistics on the social inclusion of young people (aged 16-29 years) in the European Union (EU), as well as several EFTA and candidate countries. The analysis focuses on an indicator concerning people at risk of poverty or social exclusion and its sub-components — the at-risk-of-poverty rate, the severe material deprivation rate and the share of households with very low work intensity. It also provides information distinguishing whether young people live with their parents or not. Comparisons by age groups and sex are also presented.

Full article

Living with parents

Before looking at the social inclusion indicators, Figures 1 and 2 present some basic information on the proportion of young people living with their parents. In 2018, the share of young people (aged 16-29 years) living with their parents was 67.0 % in the EU-28: for young men the share was 71.7 % while for young women it was 62.0 %, a gap of 9.7 percentage points.

In every EU Member State the proportion of young women living in the parental home was lower than that of young men, as can be seen in Figure 1. The largest gender gaps were observed in Bulgaria (21.0 percentage points) and Czechia (17.1 percentage points) while the lowest were in France (5.9 percentage points) and Sweden (4.2 percentage points). The largest shares of young men living with their parents were recorded in Croatia (92.2 %), Slovakia (88.7 %), Italy (86.8 %), Spain and Greece (both 85.8 %), while for young women the largest shares were in Croatia (83.9 %) and Italy (80.6 %). Finland (41.2 % for young men and 31.2 % for young women) and Denmark (39.5 % for young men and 29.1 % for young women) recorded the lowest shares, both for young men and for young women.

Figure 1: Share of young people (aged 16-29 years) living with their parents, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat: (ilc_lvps08)


Figure 2 shows the share of young people living with their parents, distinguishing three five-year age groups among young people. Since the vast majority of young people in education remain living with their parents, the overwhelming majority of young people who were teenagers (aged 16-19 years) lived with their parents in all EU Member States in 2018. In fact, only in one Member State - in Sweden - was the share of people aged 16-19 years living with their parents just below 90.0 % (89.5 %). The share of teenagers living with parents was above 95.0 % in 21 of the Member States, reaching above 99.0 % in Croatia (99.1 %) and Italy (99.2 %). Among the non-member countries for which data are presented in Figure 2, Norway stands out as 82.2 % of young people aged 16-19 years were living with parents, a far lower share than in any of the EU Member States.

Figure 2: Share of young people living with their parents, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat: (ilc_lvps08)

Among young people in the two older age groups — 20-24 years and 25-29 years — there were significant variations between the EU Member States. For the age group 20-24 years, the share of young people living with their parents in 2018 was below 30 % in Denmark (24.7 %) and Finland (27.4 %) and below 50 % in Sweden (41.0 %). Elsewhere, a majority of young people in this age group lived still with their parents, the shares ranging from 58.6 % in France to more than 90.0 % in Italy (91.6 %), Spain (92.2 %), Croatia and Slovakia (both at 92.3 %), and Malta (94.1 %). In all Member States, the share of young people aged 20-24 years living with their parents was lower than in the age group 16-19 years. Equally, the share of young people aged 25-29 years living with their parents was lower than in the age group 20-24 years in all EU Member States. Within this oldest group the share of young people living still with their parents ranged from less than 10.0 % in the Nordic Member States to shares above 70.0 % in Greece (72.2 %) and Croatia (76.7 %). Among the non-member countries shown in Figure 2, Norway (8.4 %) recorded a very low share of young people aged 25-29 years living with their parents while the share in North Macedonia (71.7 %) was particularly high.

Young people at risk of poverty or social exclusion

The indicator concerning the share of the population at risk of poverty or social exclusion is based on three indicators: the at-risk-of-poverty rate, the severe material deprivation rate and the share of households with very low work intensity. People at risk of poverty or social exclusion are defined as people who are in at least one (but possibly two or all three) of these situations.

In 2018, the at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rate for young people aged 16-29 years was 26.3 % in the EU-28, corresponding to about 20.6 million young people. The share of young people at risk of poverty or social exclusion increased by 1.0 percentage points between 2008 and 2010, increased by another 2.6 percentage points between 2010 and 2014 and then declined again by 3.4 percentage points between 2014 and 2018. Combining these figures, the rate in 2018 was 0.2 percentage points higher than it had been in 2008 (see Figure 3).

Figure 3: Share of young people (aged 16-29 years) at risk of poverty or social exclusion, EU-28, 2008-2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_peps01)

Figure 3 shows that young women (aged 16-29 years) had slightly higher at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rates than young men throughout the period shown, although the gender gap was narrowest in 2015 where the rates did not differ at all. The latest 2018 rates show a gender gap of 2.2 percentage points, with a rate of 27.4 % for young women and a rate of 25.2 % for young men. For comparison, in 2008 the gender gap had been 2.1 percentage points. In 2018, the rate for young men was 0.1 percentage points higher than it had been in 2008 while for young women the difference was an increase of 0.2 percentage points.

From Table 1 it can be seen that in 2018 women aged 16-29 had higher at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rates than men of the same age in 19 EU Member States, with the difference being highest in Spain (6.7 percentage points), followed by Hungary (5.1 percentage points) and Germany (4.5 percentage points). In nine Member States, young women had lower at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rates than men; the biggest differences were observed in Bulgaria (3.5 percentage points) and Malta (2.8 percentage points).

Table 1: Share of young people (aged 16-29 years) at risk of poverty or social exclusion, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_peps01)

In 2018, the EU Member States with the highest levels of young people (aged 16-29 years) at risk of poverty or social exclusion were Greece (40.2 %), Denmark (37.3 %) and Romania (35.3 %), while the lowest rates were found in Slovenia (14.7 %), Malta (13.1 %) and Czechia (11.6 %). Among non-member countries, high rates were also recorded in North Macedonia (44.4 %) and Turkey (42.4 %; 2017 data), while low rates were recorded in Switzerland (16.4 %) and Iceland (15.7 %; 2016 data).

In 2018, in the majority of EU Member States the at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rate for young people (aged 16-29) was lower for those living with their parents than for those who were not. Exceptions were Poland, Ireland, Malta, Latvia and Luxembourg, where the share was higher for those living with their parents. These differences were more significant in some Member States than in others. In Denmark, the at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rate for young people not living with their parents was 4.2 times as high as for those living with their parents (50.3 % compared with 12.0 %). The rates for young people not living with their parents were also at least twice as high as for those living with their parents in Finland, Slovenia, Austria, and Germany. As regards the EFTA countries, a similar situation was observed to that among the majority of the Member States, with the rate systematically lower for those living with their parents, with particularly large differences in the rates in Iceland (2015 data) and Norway. By contrast, in three of the four candidate countries for which data are available the rate was higher among the young people living with their parents than among those who were not, the one exception being Serbia.

Table 2: Share of young people at risk of poverty or social exclusion, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (yth_incl_030)

In all EU Member States, EFTA and candidate countries, a higher proportion of teenagers aged 16-19 years who were not living with parents were at risk of poverty or social exclusion than those who lived with parents. In Denmark, the at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rate in 2018 for young people aged 16-19 not living with their parents was 4.8 times as high as for those living with their parents (61.5 % compared with 12.7 %), while in the Netherlands and Finland the rate was 4.7 times as high. The other Member States where the rate was at least 3.0 times as high for those not living with their parents were Estonia, France and Germany and Sweden; this was also the case in Iceland (2015 data) and Norway. The smallest differences were noted in Greece and Italy where the rate for young people aged 16-19 years not living with their parents was respectively 1.1 and 1.4 times as high as for those living with their parents; similar small differences were observed in Turkey (2015 data).

Among young people aged 20-24 years, as was observed in the younger age group, in all EU Member States (with the exception of Malta) and non-member countries shown in Table 2 a higher proportion of those who were not living with their parents were at risk of poverty or social exclusion than those who lived with their parents. In 2018, in Denmark, the at-risk-of-poverty or social exclusion rate for young people aged 20-24 years not living with their parents was 7.9 times as high as for those living with their parents (64.1 % compared with 8.1 %); a similarly large difference (7.2 times as high) was observed in Norway while in Iceland it was only slightly lower (4.9 times as high; 2015 data). The other Member States where the rate was at least 3.0 times as high for those not living with their parents were Austria (5.5 times as high), Finland (4.4 times as high), the Netherlands (3.9 times as high), Germany (3.8 times as high) and Slovenia (3.6 times as high). The smallest difference was observed in Latvia, where the rate for persons aged 20-24 years not living with their parents was 1.1 times the rate observed for those living with their parents (22.8 % versus 19.9 %).

In general, a smaller share of persons aged 25-29 years were at risk of poverty or social exclusion than was the case for persons aged 20-24 years or 16-19 years. Concerning young people not living with their parents this was true for all EU Member States. In 2018, among young people living with their parents, in 21 Member States the lowest share at risk of poverty or social exclusion was among the age group 25-29 years, in six the lowest share was among the age group 20-24 years.

In some EU Member States — France, Poland, Latvia, Luxembourg, Malta, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands — a smaller proportion of young people aged 25-29 years not living with parents were at risk of poverty or social exclusion than among those living with parents.

At-risk-of-poverty rate of young people

The at-risk-of-poverty rate measures poverty in relative terms. This indicator defines a relative poverty threshold at 60 % of the net median equivalised disposable income: the population whose income is below this threshold is considered to be at risk of poverty relative to the rest of the population.

At-risk-of-poverty rate was higher in 2018 than in 2008 for all three age groups among the young population (see Figure 4): an increase of 1.5 percentage point was observed for teenagers aged 16-19 years, of 3.2 percentage points for those aged 20-24 years and of 2.1 percentage points for 25-29 year-olds.

Figure 4: Share of young people at risk of poverty, EU-28, 2008-2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_li02)

In 2018, slight differences were noted in the at-risk-of-poverty rate for young women and young men (see Table 3). For the EU-28, the difference was 2.3 percentage points, where the at-risk-of-poverty rate for young men was 19.4 % and for young women it was 21.7 %. In a majority of EU Member States — 22 out of 28 — the at-risk-of-poverty rate was higher for young women than for young men. In Spain and Denmark the percentage of young women at risk of poverty was higher than that for young men by more than 5.0 percentage points. In the remaining six Member States the situation was the reversed, with the at-risk-of-poverty rate for young men higher than for young women, with the largest difference (2.6 percentage points) in Malta.

Table 3: Share of young people (aged 16-29 years) at risk of poverty, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_li02)

Table 4 presents the at-risk-of-poverty rates for young people with an analysis whether or not they were living with parents. In 2018, a higher rate of young people (aged 16-29 years) at risk of poverty in the EU-28 was observed among young people not living with parents (25.3 %) than living with parents (17.8 %). Within each of these two subpopulations, the at-risk-of-poverty rate for the EU-28 was highest in the youngest age group (persons aged 16-19 years) and lowest in the oldest age group (persons aged 25-29).

Among young people not living with parents, Denmark, Solvenia and the United Kingdom were the only Member States where the highest at-risk-of-poverty rate among the three age groups was not for those aged 16-19 years.

Table 4: Share of young people at risk of poverty, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (yth_incl_060)

Considering the whole age group 16-29, Figure 5 shows that, in 2018, in 12 of the EU Member States, living or not with parents did not have a major impact on the risk-of-poverty rate as the difference of the indicator for these two subpopulations was less than 5.0 percentage points. In five of these 12 Member States — Latvia, Poland, Ireland, Malta and Portugal — the rates were in fact higher for young people living with parents than for those not living with parents. In the other 16 Member States, where larger differences were observed, the rates were always higher for those not living with parents. The largest differences between these rates were observed in Denmark (36.9 percentage points), Germany (19.1 percentage points), Sweden (17.5 percentage points), Austria (17.1 percentage points) and the Netherlands (17.0 percentage points).

Figure 5: Share of young people (aged 16-29 years) at risk of poverty, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (yth_incl_060)

Severe material deprivation

Material deprivation indicators have been defined to complement the relative poverty indicator (which is based on current income) by taking account of non-monetary resources. Their definition is based on the inability to afford a selection of nine specific items that are considered to be necessary or desirable, such as not being able to: afford one week’s annual holiday away from home; afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian equivalent) every second day; face unexpected financial expenses, among others. The severe material deprivation rate is based on a single European threshold. It is an absolute measure of poverty which captures the differences in living standards between EU Member States. Persons who cannot afford four or more of the nine items are considered to be severely materially deprived.

In 2018, the severe material deprivation rate for young people (aged 16-29) in the EU was lower than it had been in 2008 (see Figure 6). From 2008 to 2009 the rate followed a downward path from 10.0 % to 9.6 %. Thereafter, the rate increased for three years, peaking in 2012 at 11.7 %. In recent years the rate for young people has fallen, with five consecutive declines from a relative high in 2012, with the rate passing from 11.7 % down to 6.8 % by 2018.

Figure 6: Severe material deprivation rate for young people (aged 16-29 years), EU-28, 2008-2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_mddd11)

Among the EU Member States, in 2018 the highest proportion of young people (aged 16-29 years) who were severely materially deprived was observed in Greece (19.8 %), followed by Bulgaria (19.6 %), Romania (17.1 %) and Cyprus (13.7 %); Hungary, Lithuania and Italy were the only other Member States with rates above 10.0 %. Less than 3.0 % of young people were severely materially deprived in Slovenia (2.9 %), Malta, the Netherlands (both at 2.7 %), Sweden (2.4 %) and Luxembourg (1.8 %) — see Figure 7.

Figure 7: Severe material deprivation rate for young people (aged 16-29 years), 2008 and 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_mddd11)

As can also be seen from Figure 7, the severe material deprivation rate for young people (aged 16-29 years) was lower in 2018 than it had been in 2008 in the majority of the EU Member States. Exceptions to this situation were Greece, Cyprus, Spain, Denmark, Luxembourg, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden and Italy, where there were increases. Among these Member States with higher severe material deprivation rates for young people in 2018 than in 2008, the largest increase by far was in Greece, where the rate climbed by 7.2 percentage points. Turning to the 18 Member States with a lower severe material deprivation rate in 2018 than in 2008, the largest percentage point decreases in the rate were in Bulgaria (down 16.6 percentage points), Romania (minus 15.0 percentage points) and Poland (down 12.9 percentage points).

Looking at severe material deprivation rates among young people, substantial differences can be seen between EU Member States (see Table 5). For the EU-28 as a whole there was little difference in the severe material deprivation rates by age: among young people living with parents the rates ranged from 6.9 % for those aged 20-24 years to 7.7 % for those aged 25-29 years.

Concerning young people aged 16-19 years, severe material deprivation rates were higher among those not living with parents than those living with parents in 12 EU Member States for which data are available. In 10 Member States the situation was reversed.

For the age group 20-24 years the situation was a bit different, with only Lithuania, Estonia, Luxembourg, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom recording higher severe material deprivation rates for young people living with parents than those not living with parents, while 21 other Member States reported the reverse situation. Only in France was the rate for those living with their parents and those not living with their parents the same.

For the oldest age group — young people aged 25-29 years — the situation was less clear cut: 19 Member States reported higher rates for those not living with parents and the remaining 9 Member States reported higher rates for those living with parents.

Estonia and Poland were the only Member States to report that the severe material deprivation rates were higher in all three age groups for young people living with their parents, while the reverse was true (the rates were higher in all three age groups for young people not living with their parents) in Belgium, Bulgaria, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Austria, Portugal, Slovakia and Finland.

Table 5: Severe material deprivation rate, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (yth_incl_090)

Living in households with very low work intensity

This section focuses on young people living in households with very low work intensity (defined as households where the members of working age worked on average less than 20 % of their total potential during the 12 months preceding the survey) [1]. People living in such households are more likely to be exposed to social exclusion.

In 2018, 7.2 million people aged 16-29 years in the EU-28 lived in households with very low work intensity, equivalent to 9.4 % of the population of this age group — see Figure 8. This proportion was slightly higher than in 2008 (8.7 %). In a similar manner to that already identified for other indicators presented in this article, this proportion fell between 2008 and 2009 (from 8.7 % to 8.6 %), subsequently increased, reaching a peak of 11.8 % in 2014 and then declined — somewhat irregularly — in more recent years.

Figure 8: Share of young people living in households with very low work intensity, EU-28, 2008-2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_lvhl11)

Among the EU Member States, Denmark (21.3 %), Greece (17.7 %) and Italy (13.9 %) recorded the highest proportions of young people (aged 16-29 years) who lived in households with very low work intensity in 2018. The lowest proportions were registered in Slovenia (4.1 %), Malta (3.8 %) and Czechia (3.5 %). The proportion of young people who were living in households with very low work intensity in Cyprus and Luxembourg was 2.6 times as high in 2018 as it had been in 2008, while in Greece and Lithuania it was more than twice as high. Lower proportions of young people were living in households with very low work intensity in 2018 (compared with 2008) in the United Kingdom, Slovenia, Poland, Germany, Czechia, and Hungary (see Figure 9).

Figure 9: Share of young people (aged 16-29 years) living in households with very low work intensity, 2008 and 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (ilc_lvhl11)

As shown in Table 6, in 2018 around 8.6 % of young people (aged 16-29 years) living with parents in the EU-28 lived in a household with very low work intensity, whereas among those not living with parents the share was slightly higher, at 9.9 %. Among those living with parents, the share living in a household with very low work intensity was lowest among the youngest age group (7.9 % for those aged 16-19 years) and highest among the oldest age group (11.4 % for those aged 25-29 years); for those not living with parents the data are incomplete, but the share was lower for those aged 25-29 years than for those aged 20-24 years, in other words the reverse situation than that observed for young people living with their parents.

Table 6: Share of young people living in households with very low work intensity, 2018
(%)
Source: Eurostat (yth_incl_120)

In a similar manner to that observed for the severe material deprivation rate, for a large majority of EU Member States the share of young people living in households with very low work intensity was lower among those living with their parents than among those not living with parents for the two age groups covering young people aged 16-19 years and 20-24 years. Again, for those aged 25-29 years the situation was more balanced, with a majority — 19 Member States — reporting lower shares among those living with parents and the remaining 9 reporting lower shares among those not living with parents. In Greece the share of young people living in households with very low work intensity was higher in all three age groups among those living with parents than among those not living with parents while the reverse was true in Bulgaria, Denmark, Germany, Lithuania, Romania and Slovakia.

Source data for tables and graphs

Data sources

The data used in this article are derived from EU statistics on income and living conditions (EU-SILC). The legal basis for these data is the framework Regulation (EC) No 1177/2003. EU-SILC is the main European source of information for statistics relating to income, living conditions and social inclusion. The reference population covered by these data is all private households and their current members residing in the territory of an EU Member State at the time of data collection. Persons living in collective households and in institutions are generally excluded from the target population. The EU-28 aggregate is a population-weighted average of individual national figures.

Context

Social exclusion at an early age has the potential to have long-lasting consequences for both individuals and society as a whole as it may affect all aspects of young people’s lives. Data suggest that the decision to move towards an independent life leaving the parental household increases the risk of poverty.

For many young people, looking for a job and sustaining a household is far from easy. Indeed, young people often start with low-paid jobs and underemployment (temporary or part-time), which can lead to financial difficulties. However, this is not always the rule as the risk of poverty for youth depends on numerous other factors, including the general financial situation and the social inclusion policies where they live.

At the European Council held on 17 June 2010, the Member States’ Heads of State and Government endorsed the Europe 2020 strategy, for not only smart and sustainable, but also inclusive growth. One of its headline targets is the reduction of poverty: the main aim is to lift 20 million people out of risk of poverty or social exclusion by 2020. One of the Europe 2020 flagship initiatives is the ‘European platform against poverty and social exclusion’. It states that poverty should be combatted from an early age, as children born into poverty face a substantially higher risk of remaining poor throughout their youth and into adulthood. This is a responsibility of all EU Member States, with the European Commission playing a supporting and coordinating role.

Social inclusion was one of the eight ‘fields of action’ in the EU Youth Strategy which ran from 2010 to 2018. In May 2018, the European Commission put forward proposals for a new EU youth strategy for the period from 2019 to 2027.

Direct access to
Other articles
Tables
Database
Dedicated section
Publications
Methodology
Legislation
Visualisations
External links





Youth social inclusion (yth_incl)
People at risk of poverty or social exclusion (Europe 2020 strategy) (ilc_pe)
Main indicator - Europe 2020 target on poverty and social exclusion (ilc_peps)
Income distribution and monetary poverty (ilc_ip)
Monetary poverty (ilc_li)
Living conditions (ilc_lv)
Population structure (ilc_lvps)
Health and labour conditions (ilc_lvhl)
Material deprivation (ilc_md)
Material deprivation by dimension (ilc_mddd)

Notes

  1. Households composed only of children, of students aged less than 25 years and/or by people aged 60 years or more are excluded from the computation of this indicator (for both the numerator and denominator). Students aged 18-24 years who live with at least one other person of working age who is not a student are excluded from the computation of the household work intensity, but they are given the household work intensity computed on the basis of the other household members. The same rule applies for children.