Statistics on sport participation



Data extracted in June 2018.

No planned update.

Highlights
In 2014 around 44 % of the the EU population practised some physical activities at least once a week.
Less than a third of the EU population attended a live sport event in 2015.

Practising sport, fitness or recreational (leisure) physical activities at least once a week, 2014

It is widely recognised that participation in sport has a significant positive impact on people’s health and quality of life. It can take two different forms: professional sport and sport as a leisure activity.

This article presents statistics on participation in sport available in Eurostat and related to:

  • practising sport (in terms of physical activity) — according to the results of wave 2 of the European Health Interview Survey held in EU countries around 2014; and
  • attendance at live sport events — with data from the EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU-SILC) 2015 ad hoc module on social and cultural participation.
Full article

Active participation in sport

Practising sport has a positive influence on personal health and well-being. In addition, team sports foster players’ communication skills and build team spirit and self confidence. Achieving a sport or fitness goal can motivate people to achieve other goals. Individuals’ participation in sport is affected by many factors, most obviously gender, age and economic situation — these aspects are analysed here on the basis of the results from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) .

Practice of sport varies greatly across countries

Sport statistics take account of non-work related physical activities only. These include sport, fitness and recreational (leisure) physical activities (that cause at least a small increase in breathing or heart rate) such as Nordic walking, brisk walking, ball games, jogging, cycling, swimming, aerobics, rowing, badminton, etc.

In 2014, some 44 % of the EU population aged 15 or over reported that they practised sport at least once a week (see Figure 1). However, discrepancies between countries were very large — the proportion ranged from over 70 % in Nordic countries and Austria to around 10 % or less in Bulgaria and Romania.

In general, women practise sport less than men, but there are exceptions

In the EU as a whole, in 2014, more men than women took part in regular sport and physical activity - 47 % as against 42 % (see Figure 1). The gender gap was particularly marked in Portugal and Spain, with around 10 percentage points (p.p.) difference. In Bulgaria and Romania, few people practise sport and the percentage of men who did was around twice that of women.

On the other hand, in the five EU Member States where participation in sport was most common (Denmark, Germany, Finland, Sweden and Austria), more women than men took part in sport and leisure activities. In Denmark, the gap in favour of women was the biggest.

Figure 1: Practising sport, fitness or recreational (leisure) physical activities at least once a week, by sex, 2014 (% of population aged 15 and more) Source: Eurostat (hlth_ehis_pe3i)

Older people in some Member States are sportier than young people in others

In general, the practice of physical activities decreases with age. In 2014, the percentage of people in the EU taking part in sport ranged from 63 % among 15-24-year-olds to 32 % in the 65+ age group (see Table 1). The biggest gap was recorded in the Czech Republic and Slovakia (58 and 55 percentage points respectively), and the smallest (11 percentage points) in Denmark and Cyprus.

In the Nordic countries, Austria and Germany, a majority of people aged 65 and beyond still took part in physical activity. Their participation rate was higher than that observed for young people in several other EU countries.

Table 1: Practising sport, fitness or recreational (leisure) physical activities at least once a week, by age group, 2014 Source: Eurostat (hlth_ehis_pe3i) and (demo_pjan) and (demo_pjangroup)

People with lower incomes are less likely to practise sport

The cost of participating in sport and recreational activities may be one of the barriers to wider involvement. In 2014, in the EU as a whole, nearly 56 % of people in the top income group practised sport, as against 35 % of people with the lowest incomes (see Figure 2). The biggest differences between those in the first and fifth income quintiles were recorded in Slovenia (37 p.p.), followed by the United Kingdom (33 p.p.), Hungary (33 p.p.) and Estonia (32 p.p.); Ireland, Sweden and Romania recorded the smallest disparities (2-3 p.p.).

Obviously, some sports are expensive and less accessible for people on low incomes. However, walking, for example, does not cost anything. The level of people’s involvement in sport can probably be explained also by other factors that are not directly financial but are associated with higher income (e.g. higher educational attainment, social background and position, greater awareness of the benefits of physical activity, maybe more free time, etc.).

Figure 2: Practising sport, fitness or recreational (leisure) physical activities at least once a week, by income quintile, 2014, (% population aged 15 and more) - Source: Eurostat (hlth_ehis_pe3i)

Passive participation – attending live sport events

As regards attendance at live sport events, the question in the EU-SILC 2015 ad hoc module on social and cultural participation referred only to physical attendance of organised events as a spectator, i.e. watching an event on TV/computer was excluded, as was the active participation of the players themselves.

Attending sport events does not only reflect an interest in sport competitions but also brings people together, i.e. has important ‘socialising’ value.

In 2015, 30 % of Europeans attended a live sport event

In 2015, at EU-level, less than a third of the EU population aged 16+ reported attendance at a live sport event in the previous 12 months; 70 % had not participated in such an event. The highest attendance at sport venues was observed in the Netherlands (54 %), Finland and Sweden (both 48 %); the lowest rates of participation were recorded in Italy (19 %), Bulgaria (18 %) and Romania (16 %) - see Figure 3.

In the majority of countries, people going to sport events at most three times a year were relatively more numerous that those who attended at least four times a year. In eight countries, however, this pattern was inverted.

Figure 3: Frequency of participation in live sport events in the previous 12 months, 2015 (% population aged 15 and more) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_scp04)

More men than women attend live sport events

In 2015, some 39 % of men in the EU reported attendance at live sport events, as against 23 % of women. In no Member State did women participate more than men in such events, but the width of this ‘gender gap’ varied across countries (see Figure 4). It was smallest in the Netherlands (58 % of men and 49 % of women), while in 12 Member States the participation rate of men was at least twice as high as that observed among women.

Figure 4: Participation in life sport events (in the last 12 months), by sex, 2015 (%of population aged 16 and over) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_scp03)

Young people attend live sport events more than older people

There is a wide ‘generation gap’, in terms of attendance at live sport events, between young people (aged 16-24) and older people (aged 50 or over), at both EU and country level.

In 2015, across the EU, 47 % of young people had attended live sport events in the previous 12 months, as against 34 % of people aged 25-49 and 19 % of those aged 50 or over (see Figure 5). In the Nordic countries and the Netherlands, the participation of people aged 25-49 was similar to that of 16-24 year olds (less than 5 percentage points of difference).

Attendance at live sport events was lowest everywhere for people aged 50+. Rates of participation by young people aged 16-24 ranged from 30 % in Romania to 66 % in Latvia, while for people aged 50 or more they varied from 6 % in Bulgaria to 41 % in the Netherlands. The biggest discrepancy between countries was recorded for the 25-49 age group, with 18 % attendance in Romania and 60 % in the Netherlands.

Figure 5: Participation in live sport events (in the last 12 months), by age group, 2015 (% of population aged 16 and over) - Source: Eurostat (ilc_scp03)

In the EU, 52 % of non-participants in live sport events are not interested in them

In the 2015 EU-SILC ad hoc module, interviewees were asked about their main reason for not participating in sport events. They were given a choice between four answers:

  • financial reasons (‘I can’t afford it’);
  • lack of interest;
  • lack of proximity (‘nothing in the neighbourhood’, e.g. no stadium nearby); and
  • other reasons.

At EU level, the main reported reason was a lack of interest. The countries that scored highest in this respect were Greece (74 % of non-participants), Austria (73 %) and the Netherlands (70 %) - see Table 2. Nevertheless, it should be underlined that the question in the survey did not allow a distinction to be made between ‘no interest in the event’ and ‘no interest in attending the event’. It is possible that some of the people who declared a lack of interest understood the question in the second sense (i.e. they were interested in one or more events but preferred to watch them on TV or via the internet).

In the EU as a whole, financial reasons for non-participation in live sport events were reported by 11 % of respondents but the percentages were higher in 10 Member States and in particular in Greece (20%), Spain (19%), Romania and Bulgaria (both 16%), Lithuania (15%) and Slovenia (14%).

As regards ‘lack of proximity’, it is important to note that ‘nearby’ should be understood as being determined not only by physical distance but also by accessibility. If, for example, a venue was easily accessible by public transport, despite being quite far from a person’s home, it should be considered as being nearby. At EU level, only 5 % of people reported lack of proximity as a main reason for non participation in sport events, but the proportion was 21 % in Romania and 10 % in Finland.

Table 2: Reasons of non-participation in live sport events (in the last 12 months), 2015 (% of non-participants)- Source: Eurostat (ilc_scp06)

Source data for tables and graphs

Data sources

Eurostat’s sport statistics are derived from existing EU surveys, as to date there has been no specific data collection devoted only to sport at EU level.

Data on the practice of sport and physical activity (people’s active involvement in sport) come from wave 2 of the EHIS module on physical activity, which was run around 2014. The survey gathered data on work- and non-work related physical activity. For sport statistics purposes, only the latter was taken into account. The data presented in this article refer only to engaging in sport, fitness or recreational activities (e.g. Nordic walking, brisk walking, ball games, jogging, cycling, swimming, aerobics, rowing, badminton, etc.). The reference period is a typical seven-day week and the target population consists of people aged 15 and over.

Data on attending live sport events come from the EU-SILC 2015 ad hoc module on social and cultural participation. People’s attendance of live sports events was measured by frequency: at least once in the previous 12 months, one to three times, more than three times and never. People were also asked for their reasons for not participating. Data are presented as a proportion of the target population (aged 16 or over) or of non-participants (for reasons of non-participation).

Context

EU-level cooperation and dialogue in sport has greatly improved since 2007, when the Commission adopted a White Paper on Sport — the first sport policy document published by the EU.

Sport became one of the EU’s supporting, coordinating and supplementing competences with the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty in late 2009. For the first time, the EU was actively aiming to promote sport and physical activity at policy level — not only with a view to improving health and physical well being across the EU, but also to enhance the role that sport can play in boosting social cohesion and for its educational value.

In early 2011, the Commission adopted a Communication on sport, focusing on the role of sport in society, its economic dimension and organisational issues. On the basis of that Communication, the Council adopted the first EU Work Plan for Sport, for 2011-2014, which strengthened EU level cooperation by setting priorities for the Member States and the Commission. This was followed by the second EU Work Plan for Sport (2014-2017) and more recently (with adoption in May 2017) the EU Work Plan for Sport (2017-2020), which establishes the integrity of sport, the economic dimension of sport and ‘sport and society’ as the three main priorities for the period.

In addition, in 2012 the Council adopted conclusions on promoting health-enhancing physical activity and strengthening the evidence base for sport policy making; it called on the Commission to issue regular surveys on sport and physical activity. The 2013 Council Recommendation on health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) sought to encourage more effective policies and cooperation among all sectors that have a role to play in this field, i.e. sport and health, but also education, urban planning and the work environment.

Among other EU initiatives aimed at encouraging people to engage more in sport and physical activity, the Commission established the European Week of Sport from 2015 to promote sport and physical activity across Europe.

Direct access to
Other articles
Tables
Database
Dedicated section
Publications
Methodology
Legislation
Visualisations
External links






Attending sport events - EU-SILC survey (sprt_pcs_aes)
Attending sport events - AES 20117 and 2011 data (sprt_pcs_aes)
Physical activity (sprt_pcs_pha)
Perception survey results (urb_percep)