Agricultural census in Hungary
- Data from November 2012. Most recent data: Further Eurostat information, Main tables and Database. Due to that the agricultural census is carried out every ten years, the next update of this article will take place in December 2022.
This article is part of a series of country-specific essays on the results of the European Union (EU) Farm structure survey (FSS) 2010. The FSS collects information on the structural characteristics of the agricultural holdings (land use, livestock and labour force) and is carried out by all European Union Member States every 10 years as an Agricultural census, with two or three additional, intermediate sample surveys carried out in-between.
The present analysis of the farm structure includes a comparison with the Agricultural census 2000, the first one conducted in Hungary in compliance with the EU regulations. In contrast with the FSS 2010, the Agricultural census 2000 in Hungary did not include information on common land. In order to allow comparison between the two reference years, 2010 data presented throughout this article do not include information on common land when the analysis refers to the two waves of the survey. However, data on common land are taken into account when the analysis focuses on the most recent data set. Furthermore, 2003 sample survey data is used when comparing numbers on labour force, as the 2000 data set does not account for all farm ownership statuses.
- 1 Main statistical findings
- 2 Data sources and availability
- 3 Context
- 4 See also
- 5 Further Eurostat information
- 6 External links
- 7 Notes
Main statistical findings
As exhibited in Table 1, there were 576 790 agricultural holdings in Hungary in 2010; from among the EU Member States, Greece (723 010) and France (489 980) recorded similar values. In Hungary, about 390 000 farms ceased their activities (- 40.3 %) over the 2000-2010 timeframe – far from being a Hungarian peculiarity, this tendency was found to be widespread among the EU-27, although the decrease in Hungary was particularly pronounced.
In Hungary, the utilised agricultural area (UAA) slightly increased over the inter-census period (+ 57 250 ha): it covered an area of 4.6 million hectares or about half of the entire Hungarian territory in 2010.
As the number of holdings decreased and the agricultural land increased, the average size of the holdings grew: it almost doubled, from 4.7 ha per farm in 2000 to 8 ha in 2010.
Following a common trend among the survey countries, in Hungary the number of people regularly working on the farm decreased over the period under analysis (-21.9 %): about 1.5 million people were working on the farms in 2003, whereas only 1.1 million were left in 2010. However, the agricultural labour force still represented 27 % of the active population in 2010 – one of the highest shares recorded within the EU-27.
The Hungarian farm animal population was about 2.5 million livestock units (LSU) in 2010: compared to 2000, a 20 % decrease was observed (- 613 750 LSU). This translates to 0.25 LSU per person, an average value among survey countries.
Regional key indicators
The territorial analysis presented in Table 2 reveals the regional characteristics of the Hungarian agriculture and highlights the major role played by the territories of Észak-Alföld and Dél-Alföld. Indeed, the Northern Great Plain (Észak-Alföld) and the Southern Great Plain (Dél-Alföld) scored the highest values for each of the key indicators analysed (number of holdings, total UAA, livestock population and number of persons working on the farms), and together accounted for about 45 % of the country’s agriculture.
On the other hand, the capital region of Közép-Magyarország (Central Hungary), which is also the smallest region in terms of area and by far the most densely populated region, was found to be the region where agriculture is least prevalent.
In terms of the number of holdings, the territory of Észak-Alföld recorded the highest value (143 910) and accounted for one quarter of the entire population. Another 124 370 farms were registered within the territory of Dél-Alföld in 2010, a value which accounted for 22 % of the Hungarian population of agricultural holdings.
If the agricultural area is taken into account, it is the Southern Great Plain which displayed the highest figure: in 2010, it accounted for 23.5 % of the Hungarian agricultural area as 1.08 million hectares of UAA were recorded within its borders. The Northern Great Plain accounted for a slightly smaller share (22.6 %) with 1.04 million hectares of agricultural land recorded within its territory.
In terms of livestock – measured in livestock units (LSU) – the region of Dél-Alföld proved to be the most important. In 2010, 732 180 LSU were recorded within its territory, a value which corresponded to about 30 % of the country’s population of farm animals. As exhibited in Table 2, 630 810 LSU were recorded within the territory of Észak-Alföld, a value which accounted for about one quarter of the Hungarian farm animal population in 2010 – the corresponding value was 22 % in 2000.
In terms of the agricultural labour force, the Northern Great Plain (21 %) and the Southern Great Plain (25 %) together accounted for 46 % of the Hungarian regular labour force: about 521 440 people were recorded as working on the farms within their borders in 2010. The region of Dél-Dunántúl (13 %), Észak-Magyarország (13 %), Nyugat-Dunántúl (11 %) and Közép-Dunántúl (10 %) recorded double digit shares, whereas the territory of Közép-Magyarország registered a lower share (7.5 %) in 2010.
As exhibited in Figure 1, the Hungarian population of agricultural holdings is dominated by two size classes: small holdings with less than 2 hectares of agricultural area, and farms with 50 hectares or more of agricultural land. Despite the fact that four out of five holdings (455 530) in Hungary fall into this category, holdings with less than 2 hectares of UAA were found to cover only 3 % of the Hungarian agricultural land in 2010. On the other end of the scale, farms with 50 hectares of agricultural land or more represented a marginal 2 % of the population of holdings (13 860) but were found to account for 75 % of the country’s agricultural land (3.5 million ha) in 2010.
This type of polarisation of the agricultural structure has been observed in other eastern European countries and partially derives from the process which took place in the 1990s, when the restoration of the land property to the former owners or a division among the members of the agricultural cooperatives was implemented in many Eastern European Member States (Banski, J.)
Economic size of the farm
As exhibited in Table 3, the economic size of the Hungarian agricultural holdings reached EUR 5 237 million in 2010. In Hungary, the standard output (SO), which is calculated by summing up the standard output per hectare of crop and per head of livestock of the farms, increased by 12.5 % over the 2007-2010 timeframe. An increase was recorded for most classes of farms, with the exception of the smallest one – holdings with less than EUR 2 000 of SO – whose value actually decreased by 8.6 %. On the other side, the highest growth (+44.2 %) was recorded by farms with an economic size of EUR 100 000 to 249 999: their value increased from EUR 377 million in 2007 to 544 million in 2010.
The biggest size class, agricultural holdings with EUR 500 000 or more of SO, proved to be by far the most important, as it accounted for 43 % of the Hungarian standard output in 2010: +3.8 % compared to 2007.
From among the Hungarian regions, the Southern Great Plain recorded the highest value (EUR 1 389 million), corresponding to 26 % of the Hungarian SO. The Northern Great Plain (EUR 1 167 million) was found to account for 22.3 %; the territory of “Del-Dunántúl” recorded the third highest share (14.5 %), followed by the neighbouring regions of “Nyugat-Dunántúl” (11.7 %) and “Közép-Dunántúl” (11.6 %).
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010 and 2007
Agricultural holding by main type of farming
If the number of holdings and the main type of farming are taken into account, the four most common types of holdings in Hungary are (see Figure 2): holdings specialised in poultry, which accounted for 20 % of the total population of farms in 2010; those dedicated to various crops and livestock combined (13 %); the ones specialised in cereal, oilseed and protein crops (13 %); and farms dedicated to various granivores combined (10 %).
As exhibited in Figure 3, the ranking looks different in terms of the economic size, as only two production types scored double digit percentages in 2010: agricultural holdings specialised in cereals, oilseed and protein crops, which accounted for 26 % of the Hungarian SO, and farms dedicated to poultry, which shared 19 %.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2010
The Utilised Agricultural Area (UAA) is the total area used by the farm, regardless of the type of tenure or whether it is used as a part of common land. It includes four major components: arable land, permanent grassland and meadow, permanent crops and kitchen gardens.
In Hungary, the agricultural area was mostly taken up by arable land (82.3 %). Permanent grassland and meadows covered only 14 %, with permanent crops sharing a marginal 3.3 % in 2010. Over the period under analysis, the area of permanent grassland and meadow increased by 9.7 % (+57 250 ha), whereas the arable land remained almost stable, only gaining 18 580 hectares (+0.5 %).
As exhibited in Table 4, in 2010 the Hungarian arable land was mainly dedicated to the production of cereals (2.4 million ha), industrial crops (753 550 ha) and fodder crops (284 770 ha); also fallow land recorded remarkable values, as it took up 5.6 % of the country’s agricultural area (260 040 ha). Between the two reference years, the production area of cereals decreased by 245 390 hectares, whereas the cultivation area of industrial crops grew by 350 690 hectares of agricultural land; both fodder crops and the area dedicated to fallow land remained fairly stable.
Over the inter-census time frame, the area of permanent grassland increased by 9.7 %; in absolute terms, it gained 57 250 hectares. Only 3.5 % of the grassland, an area of 22 350 ha, was classified as pastures and meadows, the remaining 624 580 ha are rough grazing areas. These values can not be compared to the FSS 2000 because the classification schemes are not compatible.
Statistics on livestock use two different units of measurement, the number of heads (number of animals) and livestock units (LSU), with the latter allowing comparison between different types of animals.
In 2010, 381 650 holdings were keeping about 2.5 million LSU in Hungary (see table 5). Poultry were the most important production animal (976 100 LSU), representing 39 % of the Hungarian farm animal population: the corresponding share was 32 % in 2000. Since 2000, there has been a sharp decline in pigs breeding, their share dropped by 37 %. Despite this decrease, they were still the second most important production animal, totalling 793 240 LSU, or 32 % of the country total, in 2010. Cattle accounted for 21 % of the Hungarian LSU; their value of 525 410 LSU implies an 18 % decrease since 2000.
Although their number almost halved over the inter-census timeframe, holdings with livestock still accounted for 66.2 % of the Hungarian population of farms in 2010: the corresponding share was 75.9 % in 2000.
See detailed data at Nuts 2 level for 2010 and 2000
According to the FSS 2010, 1.1 million people were regularly working in the agricultural sector in Hungary (see Table 6). Following a common trend in many EU Member States, the agricultural labour force in Hungary decreased (-21.9 %) over the period under analysis: in absolute terms, the number of persons dropped by 321 190 between 2003 and 2010. The decline of the agricultural labour force looks very similar if measured in annual work units (AWU): numbers changed from 511 070 AWU in 2003 to 402 970 AWU in 2010 (- 21.1%).
The gender gap among the sole holders was reduced very slightly, as 79 % of the sole holders had been men in 2003, compared to 77 % in 2010.
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level on holders' age and gender for 2010 and 2003
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level on type of labour force for 2010 and 2003
Type of tenure
As exhibited in Table 7, half of the Hungarian agricultural land (2.3 million ha) was farmed by tenants in 2010. This share was lower in the most important agricultural areas of Észak-Alföld (43.2 %) and Dél-Alföld (41.2 %).
On the other hand, about 2 million hectares of Hungarian agricultural land (43.5 %) were farmed by the people who actually owned that land in 2010: the highest shares were recorded in the Northern Great Plain (50.1 %) and the Southern Great Plain (52.9 %).
The land utilised in partnership by the landlord and the sharecropper under a written or oral share-farming contract covered 6.5 %.
According to the Agricultural census 2010, there were 19 120 holdings keeping 707 400 heads of cattle in Hungary.
In terms of the number of farms, the most common type of animal housing was found to be the one recorded under the general “other” category (9 190 holdings) , followed by tied stables with solid dung and liquid manure, which was recorded in 8 030 holdings.
On the other hand, if the number of places is taken into account, the housing where the animals are free to move with solid dung and liquid manure was the most common (354 620 places). When analysing data on animal housing, it must be noted that holdings could record more than one type of housing.
Other gainful activities
According to the FSS 2010, there were 47 270 farms with other gainful activities in Hungary. These holdings, which accounted for 8 % of the entire population of farms, registered activities other than farm work, directly related to the holding and having an economic impact on it.
The FSS 2010 allowed respondents to indicate eleven different types of activities; each holding could specify more than one activity. Processing of farm products (26 430 farms) was the most common type of extra activity, followed by contractual work (13 450 farms), unspecified other activities (9 010 farms) and forestry-work (2 580 farms).
See detailed data at NUTS 2 level for 2000
Data sources and availability
Methodological notes Hungary – Agricultural census 2010
The Agricultural Census 2010 was the first one to be conducted after Hungary’s accession to the European Union (2004) and the second one carried out in compliance with the EU legislation. The Hungarian Central Statistical Office was the responsible body.
Survey on agricultural production methods (SAPM)
In 2010 a unique survey was carried out together with the Agricultural census, the Survey on agricultural productions methods (SAPM). This survey collected data at regional level needed to establish agri-environmental indicators as indicated in COM final 508/2006 and to evaluate the greening of the Common agricultural policy.
Data were collected according to the specifications listed in Annex V of the above mentioned regulation, namely data on tillage methods, soil conservation, landscape features, animal grazing, animal housing, manure application, manure storage and treatment facilities and irrigation.
In Hungary, the SAPM was conducted as an exhaustive survey with regard to the agricultural enterprises. On the contrary, the SAPM was carried out as a sample survey in the case of private holdings. A random selection method, based on the enumeration districts, was employed to select 3 475 enumeration districts; all the households within the selected districts were surveyed.
Data on the structure of Hungarian agriculture were collected with reference to the 1st of June 2010. Information on the labour force, non-agricultural activities as well as the SAPM data were collected with reference to the 12 months prior to this reference date. Data on rural development and irrigated area refer to the 2008-2010 time frame.
Threshold for agricultural holdings
In Hungary, all agricultural enterprises which carried out activities were surveyed in 2010. In the case of private agricultural holdings, only farms with at least 1 500 square metres of productive land area were included in the census. Moreover, farms falling below this threshold but complying with a set of different physical thresholds (in terms of the area of certain types of crops or heads of cattle) were also included in the target population.
Common land is land that does not directly belong to any agricultural holding but on which common rights apply. It can consist of pasture, horticultural or other land. The treatment of the common land used by an agricultural holding might differ from country to country.
In Hungary, common grassland was not considered as agricultural area until 2007. Thus, information on common land was included for the first time within the context of the FSS 2010: it covered an area of about 74 000 hectares (1.6 % of the Hungarian agricultural area).
Geo-reference of the holding
In Hungary, information on the location of the farms was obtained through the topographical lot number, the Integrated Administrative Control System (IACS) block identifier of the place where the main agricultural production is carried out, or through the address of the holding.
From FSS 2007 onwards, the Standard output (SO), a new classification of the economic size of the holding, is used. The SO has replaced the Standard gross margin (SGM) used before. Nonetheless, for comparability reasons, in FSS 2007 both classifications are available.
Other methodological issues
In Hungary, the Agricultural census 2000 did not include information on common land. Since data on common land were included in the FSS 2010, information on common land was filtered out of the 2010 data set when the two waves of the FSS were compared. On the contrary, whenever the present analysis took into account only the most recent data, figures on common land were included. Moreover, due to methodological reasons, the reference years for data on the Hungarian agricultural labour force are 2003 and 2010.
European Commission Rural development policy aims to improve competitiveness in agriculture and forestry, the environment and the countryside, as well as to improve the quality of life in rural areas, and to encourage the diversification of rural economies.
As agriculture has been modernised and the importance of industry and services within the economy has increased, agriculture has become much less important as a source of jobs. Consequently, increasing emphasis is placed on the role farmers can play in rural development, including forestry, biodiversity and the diversification of the rural economy, in order to create alternative jobs and provide environmental protection in rural areas.
The FSS continues to adapt in order to provide timely and relevant data to help analyse and follow these developments.
- Agricultural census 2010
- All articles on Hungary
- All farm structure articles by country (2007)
- Farm structure statistics
Further Eurostat information
- Agriculture, fishery and forestry statistics — Main results – 2010-11 - 2012 edition
- Farm Structure Survey in Hungary - 2007 - Issue number 7/2009
- Farm Structure in Hungary - 2005 - Issue number 22/2006
- Structure of Agricultural Holdings - Hungary 2003 - Statistics in focus 27/2004
- Agriculture, see:
- Farm structure: historical data (t_ef)
- Agriculture, see:
- Farm structure (ef)
Methodology / Metadata
- Farm structure (ESMS metadata file — ef_esms)
- Methodological Report - FSS 2010 Hungary
- Methodological Report - FSS 2007 Hungary
Source data for tables and figures (MS Excel)
- Regulation 1166/2008 of 19 November 2008 on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods and repealing Council Regulation 571/88
- Regulation 1200/2009 of 30 November 2009 implementing Regulation 1166/2008 on farm structure surveys and the survey on agricultural production methods, as regards livestock unit coefficients and definitions of the characteristics
- The value does not take into account data on common land.
- Due to methodological reasons, the reference years for data on the Hungarian agricultural labour force are 2003 and 2010.
- A value calculated over the active population in the 4th quarter 2010 of the EU Labour force survey (LFS) Population, activity and inactivity - quarterly data
- Jerzy Banski, Agriculture of central Europe in the period of economic transformation