|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Central Statistical Office of Poland |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Regional and Environmental Surveys Department |
||
1.5. Contact mail address |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 27/12/2013 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 27/03/2013 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 05/06/2014 |
|
|||
3.1. Data description | |||
The data collection provides information and comparable measurements on the different aspects of the quality of urban life in cities. |
|||
3.2. Classification system | |||
Specific classification and coding systems have been developed for the spatial units, variables and indicators. For the description of the coding system, the list of indicators and variables see the Methodological Manual on City Statistics. Spatial Units are listed in the annex of the Methodological Manual on City Statistics. In the current project data have been collected for the following territorial units: annual data collection – national, city, kernel and larger urban zone (LUZ); exhaustive data collection national, city, kernel, larger urban zone (LUZ) and sub-city districts (SCD). In case of Poland kernel is a new level of spatial aggregation for which CSO collects data. It covers the area of the Metropolitan Association of Upper Silesia, which consists of the following cities: Bytom, Chorzów, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Gliwice, Jaworzno, Katowice, Mysłowice, Piekary Śląskie, Ruda Śląska, Siemianowice Śląskie, Sosnowiec, Świętochłowice, Tychy and Zabrze. |
|||
3.3. Coverage - sector | |||
The indicators and variables cover several aspects of quality of life, for e.g. demography, housing, health, crime, labour market, income disparity, local administration, educational qualifications, environment, climate, travel patterns, information society and cultural infrastructure. For the complete list of indicators annd variables see the European Regional and Urban Statistics - Reference Guide. |
|||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | |||
For most variables existing international standards have been followed. Variables: TE2025V, TE2028V, TE2031V – actually living population. Variables: SA1050V, SA1051V – average prices for buying a house (SA1050V) and average prices for buying an apartment (SA1051V) were obtained as a quotient of the value and number of all transactions concluded in the surveyed territory. Average prices for buying a house (SA1050V) refers to prices of land build-up with residential building (they include price of land and price of structure). Residential buildings include detached houses, semi-detached houses, terraced houses as well as multi-family buildings. |
|||
3.5. Statistical unit | |||
In Urban Audit project main units of statistical observation are cities. The choice of cities has been made on the basis of Degree of Urbanisation (DEGURBA) classification. Data are also collected for Larger Urbann Zones (LUZ), Sub-city Districts (SCD) and kernnel. The defionition of the composition of the LUZ, SCD and kernel in terms of spatial units need to respect certain criteria set by DG Regio and Eurostat. |
|||
3.6. Statistical population | |||
Urban Audit 2012-2013 has covered 68 Polish cities. |
|||
3.7. Reference area | |||
In Poland the following 68 cities participate in the project: Warszawa, Łódź, Kraków, Wrocław, Poznań, Gdańsk, Szczecin, Bydgoszcz, Lublin, Białystok, Kielce, Toruń, Olsztyn, Rzeszów, Opole, Gorzów Wielkopolski, Zielona Góra, Jelenia Góra, Nowy Sącz, Suwałki, Konin, Żory, Częstochowa, Radom, Płock, Kalisz, Koszalin, Gdynia, Bielsko-Biała, Rybnik, Wałbrzych, Elbląg, Włocławek, Tarnów, Legnica, Grudziądz, Bytom, Chorzów, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Gliwice, Jaworzno, Katowice, Mysłowice, Piekary Śląskie, Ruda Śląska, Siemianowice Śląskie, Sosnowiec, Świętochłowice, Tychy, Zabrze,Ełk, Głogów, Gniezno, Inowrocław, Lubin, Chełm, Jastrzębie Zdrój, Leszno, Łomża, Piotrków Trybunalski, Przemyśl, Świedlce, Słupsk, Sopot, Zamość, Ostrowiec Świętokrzyski, Ostrów Wielkopolski, Pabianice, Piła, Stalowa Wola, Stargard Szczeciński, Świdnica, Tczew, Tomaszów Mazowiecki and Zgierz. |
|||
3.8. Coverage - Time | |||
2010-2012 |
|||
3.9. Base period | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
The unit of measurement various from indicator to indicator; from variable to variable. In most cases the unit of measurement is included in the label. |
|
|||
For the main data collection 2011, 2008, 2004 and 2001 are the reference years. 1996 and 1991 were the the reference years for the "historical" data collection. On annual basis variables have been collected for the period 2005-2012. |
|
|||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | |||
All data supply of urban statistics is based on a volountary agreement, as there is no Community legislation yet on this topic http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm. |
|||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics (recital 24 and Article 20(4)) of 11 March 2009 (OJ L 87, p. 164), scipulate the need to establish common principles and guidelines ensuring confidentiality of data used for the production of European statistics and the access to those confidential data with due account for technical developments and the requirements of users in a democratic society. |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
The periodicity of data is 3-years. A few indicators are collecten annually. The database is updated occasionally (on average quarterly) depending on the data availability of new and revised data. |
|
|||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | |||
http://stat.gov.pl/statystyka-regionalna/badania-regionalne/urban-audit-250/ |
|||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | |||
Not available. |
|||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | |||
The definitons of the Methodological Manual on City Statistics have been followed (for most variables). Data for all domains are given as of 31 December each year with the exception of census data (as of 31 March 2011). |
|||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | |||
The quality assurance procedures detailed in the Methodological Manual on City Statistics have been applied. Not applicable at present. |
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
Not available. |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
Statistical Office in Poznań has made an attempt to estimate few variables in the scope of labour market from LFS. Results were satisfactory and were sent to Eurostat. |
|
|||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||
User needs and stakeholder requirements are collected at several forums for example CSO during several meetings with representatives of central and local government on national urban policy. |
|||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||
Not available. |
|||
12.3. Completeness | |||
Overview of data availability. Annual data collection 2010, 2012; During the project CSO of Poland delivered data to Eurostat for: 59 variables (out of 83) at the city and kernel level; 49 variables (out of 74) at the LUZ level; 63 variables (out of 77) at the national level; Household structure – DE3001V, DE3002V, DE3003V, DE3008V, DE3011V, DE3017V data collected during censuses of population and housing only; Missing variables for the exhaustive Urban Audit. Reasons for missing variables by domain: |
|
|||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
13.2. Sampling error | |||
Not applicable. |
|||
13.3. Non-sampling error | |||
Not applicable. |
|
|||
14.1. Timeliness | |||
Depends on the domain and individual indicator. As a general rule, timelines is about 24 months. |
|||
14.2. Punctuality | |||
Timetable of the project |
|
|||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | |||
Due to the deviating definitions and different data sources used, the comparability of data is limited to some extent. Basic information on data sources are included as flags in the database and the deviating definitions is available in the part 3.4. |
|||
15.2. Comparability - over time | |||
Changes of the list of cities were made in 2004, 2008 and 2011. For the new cities no data for 1991 and 1996 were collected. For 1991 to 1996 (historical data) only a subset of indicators are available. |
|||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | |||
Data collected at SCD level is coherent with the data collected at national level to a limited extend due to the different data sources used. |
|||
15.4. Coherence - internal | |||
Internal coherence (e.g. between spatial levels, between indicators like total, male, female population) is ensured through the application of multivariable and univariable validation controls. |
|
|||
Not available. |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
No preliminary data is published. |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
As the Urban data cover are very extensive, it cannot be excluded that errors exist in the data. Datected errors will be corrected irregularly after consultation with the national coordinator. |
|
|||
18.1. Source data | |||
Basic information on data sources are included as flags in the database. The main sources of Urban Audit data are surveys of public statistics. The additional source of data are registers carried out by city offices. |
|||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | |||
Not available. |
|||
18.3. Data collection | |||
CSO branch departments (Regional and Environmental Surveys Department, Social Surveys and Living Conditions Department, Demographic Surveys and Labour Market Department, Trade and Services Department) have carried out work in the scope of Urban Audit 2012-2013 project in co-operation with two regional statistical offices – Regional Statistical Office in Poznań (Centre for Urban Statistics and Centre for Small Area Estimation) and Regional Statistical Office in Wrocław (Local Data Bank Centre in Jelenia Góra) as well as Statistical Computing Centre. Works were coordinated by Regional and Environmental Surveys Department. |
|||
18.4. Data validation | |||
In case of Poland, validation file refered to the following variables: DE 2001V, DE2002V, DE2003V, DE 3017V, TE2025V, TE2028V, TE2031V and EN 5001V, EN5003V. CSO remooved data for cities which were not cities with powit status for variables:DE 2001V, DE2002V, DE2003V, DE 3017V, TE2025V, TE2028V, TE2031V. Values for EN5001V and EN5003V remained unchanged and were confirmed by CSO - mistake in the validation rules. |
|||
18.5. Data compilation | |||
For variables SA1050V and SA1051V 2010 data were estimated at a LUZ level. Average prices were obtained by dividing the total value by the number of concluded transactions in a given area. Data for these variables are available at the LAU1 level (powiat). In case of powiats, which are partly incorporated in the LUZ area, the value and number of transactions corresponding to the population residing in the LUZ area only was taken into account. For variables EC3039V and EC3040V the source of data is EU-SILC. The survey units of EU-SILC are private households and members of these households at the age of 16 and over. For the variable SA3005V - the number of crimes on LAU 1 level was obtained from the Police Headquarters. Data for variable include number of murder and violent deaths in the powiats wholly included in the LUZ area and estimated value in the case of powiats, which are only partially located in an LUZ area. Estimates made on the basis of the population living in the area included in the LUZ in the total population of the powiat. |
|||
18.6. Adjustment | |||
Not available. |
|
|||
None. |
|
|||
|
|||