Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Ministry of higher education and research (France)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministry of higher education and research (France)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department of statistical studies on research

SIES - Sub-Directorate for Information Systems and Statistical Studies

1.5. Contact mail address

Ministère de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche

SIES - A2.2

1 rue Descartes

75231 Paris Cedex 05


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 29/03/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 29/03/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 29/03/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Private non-profit R&D (PNPRD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the private non-profit sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the private non-profit sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.  

3.2. Classification system
  • The distribution of principal economic activity and by product field is based on Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (NACE Rev. 2) ;
  • The local units for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics ;
  • The distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) is based on Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS) ;
  • The fields of research and development based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 not applicable
 
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  Only GERD and researchers in headcount are disaggregated by FORD
Socioeconomic objective (SEO)  No data available by SEO for PNP
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Private non-profit sector  Non-profit associations, foundations and public interest group
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to GOV  
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  R&D administration and other support activities: no deviations from FM §2.122.
External R&D personnel The treatment of external personnel in R&D expenditure and R&D personnel is compliant with FM §5.20-5.23, Table 5.2. Included categories of external personnel are : R&D personal working into the enterprise without being paid directly by the society (temporary workers, consultancy activities, doctoral/master's students). Volunteers are not included (FM §5.24).
Clinical trials  Compliant with Frascati manual. Clinical trials in Phase 1, 2 and 3 are included.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability

 The following categories can be distinguished :
- receipts from EU
- from international organisations
- from foreign higher education and other foreign state bodies

- foreign enterprises
- foreign national organisations.

Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  

- foreign national organisations

- from foreign higher education and other foreign state bodies

- foreign enterprises

3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  External R&D expenditures correspond to subcontracting and collaboration in R&D tasks. It is the tax-free expenditure on complete or partial R&D programs carried out by a third party on behalf of one PNP, amounts paid to support research, and research expenses incurred outside France, including payments to international organizations located abroad.
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  No.
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Source of funds For PNP, the sources of funds by R&D branch are collected on the basis of total expenditure (intramural + extramural R&D expenditure). Compliant with
Type of R&D No
Type of costs Labour costs, other current costs (icld costs for external R&D personnel), capital expenditures (breakdown by lands and buildings, instruments and equipments).
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditu

Extramural expenditures are collected only for non-defence sector. No specific information is collected for GERD.

3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  31st December of the reference year
Function The R&D personnel is classified by occupation. The researchers category corresponds to the specialists who work with the design or the creation of knowledge, products, processes, methods and new systems. Also included are executives and administrators who plan and manage the researchers work. The technicians category includes engineers whose work is not regarded as R&D per se as well as the other persons performing technical tasks linked with R&D projects. The support personnel consists of workers, qualified or not, and office personnel helping with R&D projects or who are directly associated with the implementation of such projects. 
Qualification  Researchers data are broken down by seniority. Doctoral student are collected.
Age  Less than 25, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, more than 65.
Citizenship  Not available
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Calendar year.
Function The R&D personnel is classified by occupation. The researchers category corresponds to the specialists who work with the design or the creation of knowledge, products, processes, methods and new systems. Also included are executives and administrators who plan and manage the researchers work. The technicians category includes engineers whose work is not regarded as R&D per se as well as the other persons performing technical tasks linked with R&D projects. The support personnel consists of workers, qualified or not, and office personnel helping with R&D projects or who are directly associated with the implementation of such projects.
Qualification  Researchers data are broken down by seniority. Doctoral student are collected.
Age  Not available.
Citizenship  Not available.
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

Full-time equivalents consist of average figures for the year that take account of departures and arrivals during the year and also of the time devoted to research in cases where the activity does not consist solely of R&D.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 not available    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

Compliant with and the SNA.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the PNP Sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population A census survey is used for collection of raw data. Target population consists of all PNP with NACE 72 and legal categories 92 Associations, 93 Foundations and 7410 Public Interest Groups  in the business register (which includes PNP), expanded with PNP eligible to R&D tax credit, with resultats from ScanR, a governmental search engine dedicated to the research area, and with the population from the previous year.  no
Estimation of the target population size  590 units  no
3.7. Reference area

France, including overseas departments and territories.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. 


4. Unit of measure Top

R&D expenditures are given in Keuros (1.000 euros).
R&D personnel is given in headcounts and in full-time equivalent (FTE).


5. Reference Period Top

2021


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020. 
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics and repealing Regulation https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02009R0223-20150608
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  Yes
Legal acts

National council for statistical information, Visa n°2022A713RE, survey of general interest and statistical quality.

Official bulletin of the Ministry of Higher Education and Research

Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Planned changes of legislation  No
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

According to national law, data collected through a survey labelled by the National council for statistical information may only be published in a way that no conclusions on individual units can be drawn. Data for aggregates where less than 3 units contribute to the figures are not published. Data for aggregates where 1 unit contributes to more than 85% to the figures are not published. 

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

Every individual staff member is obliged by internal rules and by the European Statistics Code of Practice to a strict confidential treatment of information.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Categories containing information from less than 3 enterprises or 1 enterprise contributing more than 85% cannot be disclosed. In order to prevent indentifcation of these celles by simple substractions from total, at least one additional category must be suppressed.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Preliminary results : June N+2

Final results : September N+2 and December N+2 (more detailed)

 

8.2. Release calendar access
The calendar may be found on the internet website of the Ministry of Higher Education and Research

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/calendrier-2023-des-publications-statistiques-du-sies-46592

8.3. Release policy - user access

Official calendar

Publications

Press releases

Users are treated according to the national statistical system rules, i.e. all users have access to the information at the same time.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases N  
Ad-hoc releases press release on the ministry website when the publication is disseminated

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y  https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/la-depense-de-recherche-et-developpement-experimental-en-2021-92628
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

N

 

 

 

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

https://data.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/explore/dataset/fr-esr-publications-statistiques/information/

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Micro-data access for researchers is possible, with legal constraints.
Access cost policy  Provisioning costs have to be paid.
Micro-data anonymisation rules  No anonymisation, due to the confidentiality rules applied to researchers (see https://www.casd.eu/en/)
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website Y   ministry website : https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/FR/
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests   Specific requests from government bodies (inspections, Cour des comptes), statistical teams from other ministries and Insee
Other  Y For researchers only : https://www.casd.eu/en/

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

https://www.cnis.fr/enquetes/enquete-sur-les-moyens-consacres-a-la-recherche-et-au-developpement-experimental-rd-dans-les-associations-et-les-gip-2022a713re/?theme=1094

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2022-12/notice---associations-et-gip-2021--14749.pdf

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Explanatory notes linked to the questionnaire.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues None
Measure to increase clarity None
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   Not always enough.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The R&D survey has obtained the Label of general interest and compliance to the rules of public statistic : https://www.cnis.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/AC_2022_Sies_RD_associations_GIP.pdf

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Every 3 to 5 years, a board of experts from the National Council of statistical information examines the quality of the survey and asks for clarifications and improvements which are assessed at the next session.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  Eurostat STI regulation  Metadata
 1  OCDE - MSTI  National aggregates
 1  MESR  National aggregates
 3  Medias  Disseminated data
 6 Cour des comptes, inspections générales de l'administration, des finances ou de l'éducation nationale, others Ministries Specific questions
 4 Researchers or students Specific questions

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  
Short description of the feedback received  
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

not available

12.3.2. Data availability

See below.

12.3.2.1. Incorporation PNP sector in another sector
Incorporation of PNP in another sector  No
Reasons for not producing separate R&D statistics for the PNP sector  Not relevant.
Share of PNP expenditure in the total expenditure of the other sector   Not relevant.
Share of PNP R&D Personnel in the respective figure of the other sector   Not relevant.
12.3.2.2. Non-collection of R&D data for the PNP sector
Reasons for not compiling R&D statistics for the PNP sector   Not relevant. Statistics are produced.
PNP R&D expenditure/ GERD*100)  
Share of PNP R&D Personnel in the respective figure of the total national economy  
12.3.2.3. Data availability on more detail level

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure 

  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  2015-  Yearly N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results
Type of R&D  2015-  Yearly N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results
Type of costs  2015-  Yearly N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results
Socioeconomic objective  N          
Region  N          
FORD  2019-  Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling   2020 Improving the results
Type of institution  2009-  Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC) 

  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  2015-  Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results
Function  2015-  Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results
Qualification N          
Employment status 2015- Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling 2020 Improving the results
Age N          
Citizenship          
Region          
FORD  2019-  Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results
Type of institution  N          

 

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE) 

  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  2015-  Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling  2020 Improving the results
Function  2015-  Yearly  N Methodological changes on sampling   2020 Improving the results
Qualification  N          
Age          
Citizenship          
Region          
FORD          
Type of institution          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  -  2  3  -  1  - +/ -
Total R&D personnel in FTE  -  2  3  -  1  -  +/-
Researchers in FTE  -  2  3  -  1  - +/ -

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

3.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure      x    
Total R&D personnel in FTE      x    
Researchers in FTE      x    

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV). 
Definition of coefficient of variation: 
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

Coefficient of variation for Total R&D expenditure : does not apply (the survey is exhaustive)

Coefficient of variation for Total R&D personnel (FTE) : does not apply (the survey is exhaustive)

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

 

a)       Extent of non-sampling errors: Difficult to measure but wo know we have problems to correctly determine the population, due to the fact that research in itself is not a criterium in official statistical databases

b)       Measures taken to reduce the extent of non-sampling errors: We cross several sources to ba as accurate as possible

c)       Methods used in order to correct / adjust for such errors: We ask a filter question : do you realize R&D, the result of which is then used to separate the PNP which are not in the scope.

 

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:  It is rather difficult to identify the PNPs who perform R&D. We use four criteria in an attempt to detect them at best : having answered they perform R&D the year before, having asked for tax credit aimed at encouraging R&D, being classified in a NACE R&D, being cited in ScanR, an aggregation site on the R&D theme.

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect: We have a filter question :

Do you perform R&D in 2021 ?

Did you perform R&D during the three previous years ?

Will you perform R&D starting from 2022 ?

We use the answers to better delineate the target population. On top of that we coordinate ourselves with the team that conducts the survey adressed to the firms.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

22% of the units who answered ar not in the target.

 

 

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not relevant.

13.3.2. Measurement error

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors

 Controls on unit used by the respondent and the consistency with the rest of the recorded information. 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 There are micro and macro controls on the survey platform and we also proposed to the respondents to call or send us a mail if they have questions. 

13.3.3. Non response error

Not requested.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
258 512  50%
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

Data entry method applied  An online questionnaire 
Estimates of data entry errors  0% of non valid values. We don't have a measurement of percentage of errors recorded.   
Variables for which coding was performed  No coding was performed
Estimates of coding errors  No coding was performed
Editing process and method Online and offline micro-controls and offline macro-controls. Comparison with N-1 data. During the data collection and cleaning, if there is an error (wrong unit for example), the person in charge of the survey can correct the wrong value directly on the online questionnaire of the respondent. 
Procedure used to correct errors  Imputation, re-contact the respondents for clarifications if we detect errors or inconsistencies. 
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 

b) Date of first release of national data: 

c) Lag (days): 

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31 December, 2021

b) Date of first release of national data: July 2023

c) Lag (days): Roughly 19 months

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

 

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  We don't transmit provisional data, only final.  19
Delay (days)   Not concerned  30
Reasoning for delay  Not concerned  For reasons of programming the automation of SDMX file production

 


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

Nothing noticeable.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual paragraphs and the EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  N  Not concerned
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39.  N  Not concerned
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  Not concerned
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25  N  Not concerned
Approach to obtaining FTE data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  Not concerned
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015,Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  N  Not concerned
Statistical unit FM2015, § 10.40-10.42 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  Not concerned
Target population FM2015, § 10.40-10.42 ((in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  Not concerned
Sector coverage FM2015, § 10.2-10.8 ((in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  N  Not concerned
Reference period for the main data Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 18  N  Not concerned
Reference period for all data Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 18   N  Not concerned
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method  N  Census
Survey questionnaire / data collection form  N  Online questionnaire and the responses are hosted in a database. 
Cooperation with respondents  N They can call us if they have questions or problem. We do a follow-up to remind them the deadline and write them back if there is something wrong or not clear with their answers.
Data processing methods  N After data collection and follow-up to correct some errors, we clean the data and do imputation for the non respondents (see the following row for more details). 
Treatment of non-response  N

First we impute the N value with the N-1 answer when the unit answered the previous year. Secondly we estimate which part of the non-respondents is in the target and which part is not, based on the proportion in the respondent population cut in strata. It gives us coefficients applied stratum by stratum. 

Data compilation of final and preliminary data  Not concerned, we only have final data  No comments
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)   From 1978  2020, 1997, 1992 

 2020 : Methodological innovations on the sampled part.

1997:Change in the method of evaluation of R&D (expenditure and personnel).
1992:The survey method for the private non-profit sector changed

  Function   From 1978  20201997, 1992 

 2020 : Methodological innovations on the sampled part.

1997:Change in the method of evaluation of R&D (expenditure and personnel).
1992:The survey method for the private non-profit sector changed

  Qualification Not concerned, we don't collect data on qualification.    
R&D personnel (FTE)  From 1978  20201997, 1992 

 2020 : Methodological innovations on the sampled part.

1997:Change in the method of evaluation of R&D (expenditure and personnel).
1992:The survey method for the private non-profit sector changed. 

  Function  From 1978  20201997, 1992 

 2020 : Methodological innovations on the sampled part.

1997:Change in the method of evaluation of R&D (expenditure and personnel).
1992:The survey method for the private non-profit sector changed. 

  Qualification  Not concerned, we don't collect data on qualification.    
R&D expenditure  From 1978  20201997, 1992, 1981  

2020 : Methodological innovations on the sampled part.

1997:Change in the method of evaluation of R&D (expenditure and personnel).

1992:The survey method for the private non-profit sector changed.

1981:The evaluation of R&D expenditure was modified to take account of: - a reassessment of the proportion of time devoted to research by lecturers. The Ministry of Education currently estimates this share to amount to 50% on average, whereas the coefficients previously supplied by the Ministry and applied until 1980 (natural sciences 65%, medicine 30% and social sciences 10%) amounted on average to approximately 35%; 

Source of funds  From 1978  2020, 1992

2020 :  Methodological innovations on the sampled part.

1992 : Account has been taken of the repayment of reimbursable aid in the distribution of R&D expenditure by source of funding. 

Type of costs  From 1978  2020 2020 : Methodological innovations on the sampled part.
Type of R&D  From 1978  2020 2020 : Methodological innovations on the sampled part.
Other  No    

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Are the data produced in the same way in the odd and even years? If no, please explain the main differences. 

Yes it is. 

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Survey results are the input for national accounts, there is no other source for R&D.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total PNP R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total PNP R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of PNP researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  -  -  -
Final data (delivered T+18)      
Difference (of final data)  Not relevant, we disseminte only final data.   Not relevant, we disseminte only final data.   Not relevant, we disseminte only final data.
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1) -
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  We are unable to provide this information because we don't have other current costs for external R&D personnel

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  Not available  Not available
Data collection costs  Not available  Not available
Other costs  Not available  Not available
Total costs  Not available  Not available
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  258 Sum of all surveyed PNPs that responded partially or entirely to the survey.
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1

Those who perform R&D : 3h30

Those who answered  they don't perform R&D : 27 mn

Mean of the time spent reported by the respondents. 98 % of the respondents gave the time spent.
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  Not available  Not available
Total cost  Not available  Not available

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name   Survey on resources devoted to R&D in private non profit organizations and public interest groupings 
Type of survey  Census among all known PNPs deemed to perform R&D
Combination of sample survey and census data  Not concerned
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  Not concerned
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  Not concerned
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  Not concerned
Variables the survey contributes to   All the variables requested by the European regulation
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  

Starting date: October 30, 2023

First reminder: March 1st, 2024

Estimated ending date: April 30, 2024

18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  No sample   Not concerned   Not concerned
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)  -  -  -
Stratification variable classes  -  -  -
Population size  512  -  -
Planned sample size  -  -  -
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)  -  -  -
Survey frame We mix four sources : NACE 72, tax credit for research, previous year respondents, completed by ScanR  -  -
Sample design  Census  -  -
Sample size  512  -  -
Survey frame quality  Reasonnably good    
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  DgFip ; Insee
Description of collected data / statistics  Individual data on the Research Tax Credit ; Extract from Insee Firms Register SIRUS ==> both in order to select the units in the survey
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to 2019 - 2021 for RTC ; 2021 for SIRUS file
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Yearly.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider  Individual staff members of the units. Usually the finance directors, research managers, HR department.  
Description of collected information We collect information on the nature and use of  intramural and extramural R&D expenditures, the regions where they are used, the resources and their origins. We also collect information on the R&D staff and the administrative personnel who support the R&D (HC and FTE). For the personnal, we collect information on their age, gender, their function, the type of contract they are on, who pay them, their work place. 
Data collection method All the units receive an email to inform them about the survey, the deadlines and the link to the online questionnaire with their identifiers. We have access to their questionnaire whether it is completed or not. That means, we can use partially completed questionnaires.   
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients  Not asked. We ask for FTE.
Realised sample size (per stratum)  No sample, it is census.
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.)  Online survey. The units have access to the questionnaire and just have to fill it. 
Incentives used for increasing response Follow-up and calls and explanation of the use of the data collected and as a last ressort, a letter of the sub-director for Information Systems and Statistical Studies
Follow-up of non-respondents By email if an email adress is known, by postal mail for the others, by phone call for the most influent ones. 
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed) Not concerned
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  50 %
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods) We use the filter question "Did you performed R&D in year N" to apply coefficients in order to estimate the non-response part and we do imputation for the non-respondents based on their previous year answer if available.
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  N
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/enquete-rd-aupres-des-administrations-81709
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  N
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:

https://www.cnis.fr/enquetes/moyens-consacres-a-la-recherche-et-au-developpement-experimental-rd-dans-les-associations-et-les-gip-enquete-sur-les-2023a707re/

18.4. Data validation

Emails and phone follow-up to increase the response rate, consistency checks with the last survey answers and overall consistency of the answers (personnel expenditure and FTE for example).

Final results are discussed with our colleagues responsible for HESSI and the sub-director for Information Systems and Statistical Studies.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

The imputation rate for PNP R&D expenditure is equal to 24% in 2021.

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  We run our survey every year, so we are not concerned. 
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  We run our survey every year, so we are not concerned. 
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  We collect information (expenditures and personnal FTE) on the regions where the R&D is performed by the units in the survey. 
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  Not concerned. We ask directly for R&D amount in the survey. But the units are free to explicit such a ratio in their own calculations.
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  Depreciation and VAT are excluded from R&D expenditure.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  No deviation. 
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method Every respondent unit has a weight equal to one since it is a census.
Description of the estimation method

We first do imputation for non-response by imputing the previous survey's response if available. Then we calculate a share by criteria of selection into the population of the units who realy perform research. Theses calculations give coefficients applied to the summary results of the population of respondents. The criteria are :

- selected because of NACE 72,

- selected beceause of tax credit for research,

- selected because they were in the population the previous year and declared they performed R&D

- selected because they were in the population the previous year but didn't answer

- other source

18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top