Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistical Office in Szczecin


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistical Office in Szczecin

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Statistics Centre for Science, Technology, Innovation and Information Society

1.5. Contact mail address

Jana Matejki Street 22

70-530 Szczecin

Poland


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 23/10/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 23/10/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 23/10/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on higher education R&D (HERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the higher education sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the higher education sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics(EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics) complements this with guidelines for further harmonisation among EU, EFTA and candidate countries.

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications

Not applicable

3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D In accordance with FM. There are no difficulties encountered with the definition of R&D.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD) In accordance with FM. There are no difficulties encountered with the FORD classification.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS) In accordance with FM. There are no difficulties encountered with the SEO classification.
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Higher education sector Higher Education Sector comprises all universities, colleges of technology and other institutions providing formal tertiary education programmes, whatever their source of finance or legal status, and all research institutes, centres, experimental stations and clinics that have their R&D activities under the direct control of, or administered by, tertiary education institutions. 
     Tertiary education institution This type of entities are total included in Higher Education sector.
     University and colleges: core of the sector This type of entities are total included in Higher Education sector. 
     University hospitals and clinics This type of entities are total included in Higher Education sector. 
     HES Borderline institutions This type of entities are total included in Higher Education sector. 
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to HES There are no units that primary do not belong to HES.
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities Expenditure on R&D administration and other support acticities are included in data only if these costs are integrated part of the R&D activity.
External R&D personnel Only if they are engaged in R&D projects. 
Clinical trials In accordance with FM.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  Data available in breakdowns in accordance with FM.
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  Data available in breakdowns in accordance with FM.
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No) Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure Statistics on expenditure on extramural R&D are compiled. The method that is employed to separate it from intramural expenditure is compatible with FM.
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure All respondents problems with distinguishing intramural fron extramural R&D expenditure are consulted on an ongoing basis with the emloyees responsible for the implementation of the survey.
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Source of funds In accordance with FM.
Type of R&D In accordance with FM.
Type of costs In accordance with FM.
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure Not all defence R&D data is included in the survey because of the state secret. There are no estimates made for not available data.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Function In accordance with FM.
Qualification In accordance with FM. Except ISCED level 5, because in Polish educational system it does not occur. 
Age In accordance with FM.
Citizenship In accordance with FM.
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Function In accordance with FM.
Qualification In accordance with FM. Except ISCED level 5, because in Polish educational system it does not occur.
Age No breakdown by age in FTEs.
Citizenship No breakdown by citizenship in FTEs. 
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

FTE are reported by the reporting unit.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
Cross-classification by occupation and qualification of R&D personnel is available for internal and external researchers.  HC Annual
Cross-classification by function and qualification of R&D personnel is available for internal and external personnel. HC Annual
Cross-classification by occupation and qualification of R&D personnel is available for internal and external researchers. FTE Annual
Cross-classification by function and qualification of R&D personnel is available for internal and external personnel. FTE Annual
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit is the institutional unit as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the HES Sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population All Higher Education Institutions (public and private) known or supposed to perform or fund R&D on regular basis as well as occasionally are included in the target population.  
Estimation of the target population size  441  
3.7. Reference area

Not requested. R&D statistics cover national and regional data.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. The base year for the unit Purchasing Power Standard (PPS) and PPS per inhabitant at constant prices is currently 2005. All calculations of non-basic unit (national currencies) are done by Eurostat.


4. Unit of measure Top

The units of measures used in the survey:

  • thousand units of national currency,
  • HC,
  • FTE,
  • %.


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations Statistics Poland is obliged to submit data on R&D activities to international organisations.
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation The production of national R&D statistics is governed by the general national statistical legislation.
Legal acts Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics and Regulation of the Council of Ministers on Statistical Surveys Program of Public Statistics.
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts) Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics.
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts) Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics.
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts) Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics.
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts) Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics.
Planned changes of legislation Regulation of the Council of Ministers on Statistical Surveys Program of Public Statistics is intorduced annually.
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics. 

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics. 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

If there are less than 3 units in specific division or if the unit’s share of the market is more than 75% the data cannot be published and must be flagged confidential.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

In Poland there is release calendar.

8.2. Release calendar access

The release calendar is accessible on the Statistics Poland website.

8.3. Release policy - user access

The data is published for the first time in a singature study that is published on the Statistics Poland website.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Frequency of data collection is annually and the published data refer to the year.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases Y News release - Statistics Poland / Topics / Science and Technology / Science and Technology / Research and experimental development in Poland in 2021
Ad-hoc releases  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland (Statistics Poland / Topics / Statistical yearbooks / Statistical Yearbooks / Statistical Yearbook of the Regions - Poland 2022), Statistics Yearbook of Industry (Statistics Poland / Topics / Statistical yearbooks / Statistical Yearbooks / Statistical Yearbook of Industry - Poland 2022), Statistical Yearbook of the Regions - Poland (Statistics Poland / Topics / Statistical yearbooks / Statistical Yearbooks / Statistical Yearbook of the Regions - Poland 2022), Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland (Statistics Poland / Topics / Statistical yearbooks / Statistical Yearbooks / Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland 2023), Science and technology in Poland (Statistics Poland / Topics / Science and Technology / Science and Technology / Research and experimental development in Poland in 2021), Research and experimental development in Poland (Statistics Poland / Topics / Science and Technology / Science and Technology / Research and experimental development in Poland in 2021) published by THE STATISTICS POLAND
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Database:

Statistics Poland - Local Data Bank

Bank Danych Makroekonomicznych (stat.gov.pl)

Main | DBW (stat.gov.pl)

STRATEG (stat.gov.pl)

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information Micro-data are not disseminated.
Access cost policy Micro-data are not disseminated. 
Micro-data anonymisation rules Micro-data are not disseminated. 
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y  Aggregate figures News release, publications and Database.
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y   Aggregate figures Specific data not available in official publications can be supplied by order and are usually available as an Excel file.
Other      

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Polish R&D survey is based on the metodology included in the FM 2015. The metadata of the R&D survey are described in Methodological report - research and experimental development.



Annexes:
Methodological report research and experimental development
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)  Metadata (methodological and analytical notes) included in Methodological report - research and experimental development, publications, analysis, tables or graphs.
Additional explanations for the users (assistance) are also provided if required, by the Statistical Information Centre as well as by the authors of the survey.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues Sometimes there are questions about definition or the scope of data.
Measure to increase clarity For example: footnotes.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  Explanations were comprehensive.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Quality assurance framework is based on quality guidelines, training courses for all persons engaged in the R&D survey, the use of best practices, quality reviews, self-assessments, compliance monitoring.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

National methodology is compatible with the guidelines of the Frascati Manual 2015. Data are of a good quality and are comparable with data from foreign countries.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1- International  Eurostat, OECD  Data used for the European Scoreboard and its further development.
 1 - National  National Ministries, governmental agencies and Regional Statistical Offices  Data for analysis, publishing, etc.
 3 - Media  National and regional media  Data for analysis, publishing, etc.
 4 - Researchers and students  Researchers and students  Data for analysis, publishing, study, etc.
 5 - Enterprises or businesses  Enterprises  Data for market analysis, marketing strategy, etc.

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction Users’ satisfaction survey is not carried out but the statistical program is announced every year and is given for consultation to ministries, universities and scientists, voivodships’authorities, who can put forward any suggestions which are taken into consideration and statistical plan may be changed.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics No
Short description of the feedback received Not available
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables 5          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure          
Optional data on R&D expenditure          
Obligatory data on R&D personnel          
Optional data on R&D personnel          
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y - 1994 annual        
Type of R&D  Y - 1994  annual        
Type of costs  Y - 1994  annual         
Socioeconomic objective  Y - 2012 annual         
Region  Y - 2000 annual         
FORD  Y - 1995 annual         
Type of institution  Y - 2021 annual         

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y - 2000 annual        
Function  Y - 1994 annual         
Qualification  Y - 1994 annual         
Age  Y - 2005 (data only for researchers) annual         
Citizenship  Y - 2005 (data only for researchers) annual         
Region  Y - 2000 annual         
FORD  Y - 2000  annual         
Type of institution  Y - 2021 annual         

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y - 2000 annual        
Function  Y - 1994  annual         
Qualification  Y - 2018 annual         
Age  N          
Citizenship  N           
Region  Y - 2000 annual         
FORD  Y - 1995  annual         
Type of institution  Y - 2021 annual         

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 R&D entities  Y - 19999  annual       total

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure - - - 5 5  
Total R&D personnel in FTE 5  
Researchers in FTE  

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure 5        
Total R&D personnel in FTE        
Researchers in FTE        

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Not applicable

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise not available
Government not available 
Higher education not available 
Private non-profit not available 
Rest of the world not available 
Total not available 
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Function Researchers  not available
Technicians  not available 
Other support staff  not available 
Qualification ISCED 8  not available
ISCED 5-7  not available
ISCED 4 and below  not available
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 not available

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 not available

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Measurement errors included errors with data collection and respondent mistakes.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 To reduce measurement errors we train persons responsible for R&D survey, before the survey starts we do questionnaire testing and prepare guidelines for responsents.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
 424  441  0.04
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
 R&D expenditure 0% census survey  
 R&D personnel in HC 0% census survey   
 R&D personnel in FTE 0% census survey   
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

When the online questionnaire is enabled, there are sent four reminders about the upcoming deadline for submission of the report. After that there are also phone calls made and urging e-mails and letters sent.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied

Electronic online questionnaires.
Data keying from paper questionnaires into electronic format. (CENSUS)

Estimates of data entry errors not available
Variables for which coding was performed not available 
Estimates of coding errors not available 
Editing process and method Electronic questionnaire includes build-in rules was used.

Different methods of editing the data (both manual and computer editing): comparisons with data from previous collections of the same statistics, comparisons with data from other surveys including the same variables, extreme values checking, logical and numerical editing (computers programs detecting errors). (CENSUS)

Procedure used to correct errors Re-contact with information provider. (CENSUS)
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 24.10.2022

c) Lag (days): 297

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of final release of national data: 24.10.2022

c) Lag (days): 297

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = 0

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10 18 
Delay (days)   0
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

Survey accordande with FM. There is no problems with international comparability.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197  or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts/issues.

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2). No  
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39. No   
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with Eurostat'EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25 No   
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2). No   
Statistical unit FM2015 §3.70 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Target population FM2015 §9.6 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Sector coverage FM2015 §3.67-3.69 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No    
Post-secondary (non university / college) education institutions FM2015 §9.12 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Hospitals and clinics FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Borderline research institutions FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). No   
Major fields of science and technology coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No  
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18  No  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method No  
Survey questionnaire / data collection form No   
Cooperation with respondents No   
Coverage of external funds No   
Distinction between GUF and other sources – Sector considered as source of funds for GUF No   
Data processing methods No   
Treatment of non-response No   
Variance estimation No  
Method of deriving R&D coefficients No   
Quality of R&D coefficients No   
Data compilation of final and preliminary data No  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)  5 years   Included in data internal and external personnel, in previous years data included only internal personnel
  Function  4 years    Included in data internal and external personnel, in previous years data included only internal personnel 
  Qualification  5 years   Included in data internal and external personnel, in previous years data included only internal personnel 
R&D personnel (FTE)  5 years   Included in data internal and external personnel, in previous years data included only internal personnel 
  Function  4 years   Included in data internal and external personnel, in previous years data included only internal personnel 
  Qualification  4 years     Included in data internal and external personnel, in previous years data were estimated
R&D expenditure  6 years   Changes in the method of classifying units to this sector 
Source of funds  6 years    Changes in the method of classifying units to this sector 
Type of costs  6 years    Changes in the method of classifying units to this sector 
Type of R&D  6 years   Changes in the method of classifying units to this sector 
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

The data produced in the same way in the odd and even years.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics. The education statistics (UNESCO/OECD/Eurostat (UOE)) include R&D expenditure in tertiary educational institutions and follow the recommendations of the Frascati manual regarding the definition of R&D expenditure. Due to the differences in the coverage some differences in the two datasets (UOE questionnaire and the R&D HES surveys) are expected. However, there is a need to ensure that a harmonised approach is used for compiling data in the two domains. The two statistical domains should aim for a consistent use of R&D coefficients for splitting teaching and research time.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

In the SNA classfication HES do not exist, so there is no coherence in this sector with National Account.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
 not applicable not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable  not applicable 
15.3.4. Coherence – Education statistics

Education statistics are prepared by another statistical office, so there is no access to information about differences.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – HERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10) 13058960 thousand of national currency  73941  59457.6
Final data (delivered T+18) 13058960 thousand of national currency  73941  59457.6
Difference (of final data)  0  0  0
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1) 118.7 thousand of national currency
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  28.2 thousand of national currency

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  not available  not available
Data collection costs  not available  not available
Other costs  not available  not available
Total costs  not available  not available
Comments on costs
 Details of costs by requested structure are not available

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)

 262

data from questionarie
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1

 6.4

 

data from questionarie about the time needed to prepare the data and fill in the questionarie
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  not available  
Total cost  not available  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name Report on research and experimental development (R&D) - PNT-01 
Type of survey Census
Combination of sample survey and census data N/A
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s) N/A
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling) N/A 
    Sub-population B (covered by census) N/A 
Variables the survey contributes to Intramural R&D expenditure by:source of funds, type of costs, type of R&D, field of R&D, NACE rev. 2 (type of economic activity), product field, socio-economic objectives, size class, NUTS 2.

R&D personnel by: occupation, qualification, NACE rev. 2 (type of economic activity), size class, sex, NUTS 2.

Survey timetable-most recent implementation By the end of August date are collected by electronic questionnaire portal. In the third quarter, data is verified, explained with reporting units and corrected if necessary. At the beginning of the fourth quarter, the data set is accepted and the results published.
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  not applicable    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)  not applicable    
Stratification variable classes  not applicable    
Population size  441    
Planned sample size  not applicable    
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)  not applicable    
Survey frame  The general frame built in cooperation with the Ministry of Science and Higher Education and other Ministries andon the basis of an official register of national economic entities named REGON (Rejestr Gospodarki Narodowej - Register of National Economy)    
Sample design  not applicable     
Sample size  not applicable     
Survey frame quality Only the Rector's Office is taken from the Register of National Economy. Their faculties are informed about the obligation of data transfer by the head office.

There are no double entries of units in the frame. There is a possibility that some of the units existing in the frame have suspended their activity or that they have not started their activity yet, but this is revealed after the survey is carried out.

   
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  not applicable
Description of collected data / statistics  not applicable
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  not applicable
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider All universities, colleges of technology and other institutions of post-secondary education, whatever their source of finance or legal status. It also includes all research institutes, experimental stations and clinics operating under direct control of or administered by or associated with higher education institutions
Description of collected information The scope of data obtained is consistent with the questionnaire
Data collection method Most data were collected via reporting portal made available to units on the Statistics Poland website, some questionnaires were sent by post and e-mail or rarely was collected by telephone interview
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients not applicable
Realised sample size (per stratum) not applicable 
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.) The questionnaire is made available through the reporting portal, in addition it is possible to send the completed report by post or e-mail
Incentives used for increasing response No incentives are used, except for reminding of the obligation of statistical data transfer in accordance with the Law issued on 29 VI 1995 on Official Statistics and Regulation of the Council of Ministers on Statistical Surveys Program of Public Statistics 
Follow-up of non-respondents not available 
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed) We do not replace units which do not respond after follow-up interview
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility) 96%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods) Not used 
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  PNT-01_2021_ENG
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  PNT-01_2021
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  Methodological_report_research_and_experimental_development
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  Zeszyt_metodologiczny_dzialalnosc_badawcza_i_rozwojowa


Annexes:
Report on R&D for 2021 - in English
Report on R&D for 2021 - in the national language
Methodological report research and experimental development - in English
Methodological report research and experimental development - in the national language
18.4. Data validation

Procedures for checking and validating data include:

  • checking response rates are as required;
  • comparing the statistics with previous cycles (if applicable);
  • confronting the statistics data from survey against administrative data;
  • investigating inconsistencies in the statistics.
18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  The final data comes from the R&D survey.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data The preliminary data comes from the R&D survey before its completion and approval of the result data set. 
18.5.3. Methodology for derivation of R&D coefficients
National methodology for their derivation.  not applicable
Revision policy for the coefficients  not applicable
Issues that affect their quality (e.g. date of last update, aggregation level at which they are computed, etc).  not applicable
18.5.4. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  Data for regions are prepared on the basis of reports of units from the given region (adequatelly to the seat of unit).
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items Assumptions made by those who compile the statistics:

- employee who is working full-time, spending during the reference year on R&D:
  a) 95% or more of total working time - 1,0 EPC
  b) 75% of total working time - 0,75 EPC
  c) 50% of total working time - 0,5 EPC,
- employee who is working part-time (half-time job), spending during the reference year on R&D:
  a) 95% or more of total working time - 0,5 EPC
  b) 50% of total working time - 0,25 EPC
- employee hired in the unit for a period of 6 months during the reference period for a full-time job and spending on R&D 90% or more of their total working time - 0,5 EPC
- employee performing R&D on the basis of contract other than labour contract - full, actual time of work during the reference period form all contracts as a proper fraction of yearly working time.

Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  Exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures.
Treatment and calculation of GUF source of funds / separation from “Direct government funds”  GUF funds include funds provided in the form of a subsidy by the Ministry of Education and Science to finance R&D at HES. The PNT-01 questionnaire collects data on sources of financing, including funds received as a subsidy from the Ministry of Education and Science.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics -
18.5.5. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method  Not used.
Description of the estimation method  Not used.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top