|
For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support |
|
|||
1.1. Contact organisation | Hungarian Central Statistical Office |
||
1.2. Contact organisation unit | Business Statistics Department, Internal Trade and Research and Development Statistics Section |
||
1.5. Contact mail address | 1024 Budapest, Keleti Károly utca 5-7, Hungary |
|
|||
2.1. Metadata last certified | 27/10/2023 | ||
2.2. Metadata last posted | 27/10/2023 | ||
2.3. Metadata last update | 27/10/2023 |
|
||||||||||||
3.1. Data description | ||||||||||||
Statistics on higher education R&D (HERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the higher education sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the higher education sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics(EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics) complements this with guidelines for further harmonisation among EU, EFTA and candidate countries. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology. |
||||||||||||
3.2. Classification system | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.2.1. Additional classifications | ||||||||||||
No further classification is used.
|
||||||||||||
3.3. Coverage - sector | ||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||
3.3.1. General coverage | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.3.4. International R&D transactions | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures | ||||||||||||
According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).
|
||||||||||||
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions | ||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||
3.4.1. R&D expenditure | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.4.2. R&D personnel | ||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||
3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation | ||||||||||||
R&D reporting units report data on researchers, technicians and other staff in headcount and also provide the ratio of time spent on R&D, based on which HCSO calculates the FTE data for internal R&D personnel. Post-gradute students can be reported as both internal or external R&D personnel. In their case, the time devoted to research is accounted for similarly to the other R&D personnel. |
||||||||||||
3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
3.5. Statistical unit | ||||||||||||
The statistical unit is the institutional unit as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993, if there are deviations please explain. |
||||||||||||
3.6. Statistical population | ||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||
3.6.1. National target population | ||||||||||||
The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units. The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the HES Sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level.
|
||||||||||||
3.7. Reference area | ||||||||||||
Not requested. R&D statistics cover national and regional data. |
||||||||||||
3.8. Coverage - Time | ||||||||||||
Not requested. See point 3.4. |
||||||||||||
3.9. Base period | ||||||||||||
Not requested. The base year for the unit Purchasing Power Standard (PPS) and PPS per inhabitant at constant prices is currently 2005. All calculations of non-basic unit (national currencies) are done by Eurostat. |
|
|||
R&D personnel: number of persons R&D expenditure: thousand Euro, thousand HUF |
|
|||
January 1 - December 31, 2021 |
|
||||||||||||||
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements | ||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||
6.1.1. European legislation | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
6.1.2. National legislation | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
6.1.3. Standards and manuals | ||||||||||||||
- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development - European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics |
||||||||||||||
6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing | ||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
|
|||
7.1. Confidentiality - policy | |||
Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes. A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.
a) Confidentiality protection required by law: Legislation and policy at national level:
HCSO ensures confidentiality for all the data reported by data providers and the exclusive use of the data for statistical purposes. We disseminate only aggregated data in full compliance with the rules of confidentiality. Individual data, as well as aggregated data consisting of fewer than 3 data providers are regarded as confidential. Researchers have access to de-identified data sets and to anonymised micro data for scientific purposes with appropriate legal and methodological guaranties in place.
b) Confidentiality commitments of survey staff: Employees can work with datasets in their competence with registered and controlled access rights, and need to work in line with the confidentiality policies and protocols. |
|||
7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment | |||
According to the Hungarian Act on Statistics those aggregates which come from less than 3 data providers are deemed to be confidential. To publish these values we need a permission from each affected data provider. |
|
|||
8.1. Release calendar | |||
There is a release policy in place for the R&D data set. The release calendar is publicly available on the website. |
|||
8.2. Release calendar access | |||
HCSO's publication and revision calendar is publicly available on the website: |
|||
8.3. Release policy - user access | |||
Data is disseminated to the public according to the release policy and release calendar. At t+M6, some key, preliminary results were published in the national online summary tables. Dissemination of the final data in the national database took place at t+M9. |
|
|||
Yearly |
|
||||||||||||||||
10.1. Dissemination format - News release | ||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||
10.1.1. Availability of the releases | ||||||||||||||||
1) Y - Yes, N – No |
||||||||||||||||
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications | ||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||
10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination | ||||||||||||||||
1) Y – Yes, N - No |
||||||||||||||||
10.3. Dissemination format - online database | ||||||||||||||||
http://statinfo.ksh.hu/Statinfo/themeSelector.jsp?page=2&szst=OHK&lang=en |
||||||||||||||||
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations | ||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
||||||||||||||||
10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access | ||||||||||||||||
See below. In order to support scientific research, HCSO opens up data files for accredited researchers. R&D microdata is disseminated at HCSO' Safe Center. |
||||||||||||||||
10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
10.5. Dissemination format - other | ||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||
10.5.1. Metadata - consultations | ||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
||||||||||||||||
10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means | ||||||||||||||||
1) Y – Yes, N - No |
||||||||||||||||
10.6. Documentation on methodology | ||||||||||||||||
Each publication with R&D data contains the main definitions, concepts and a section on brief methodological summary of the R&D data collection. E.g.: Summary Tables - Methodology Summary: https://www.ksh.hu/apps/meta.objektum?p_lang=EN&p_menu_id=110&p_ot_id=100&p_obj_id=BHAA https://www.ksh.hu/docs/eng/modsz/tte_meth.html
Detailed R&D metadata are available on the website of Hungarian Central Statistical Office, both in English and Hungarian: http://www.ksh.hu/apps/meta.menu?p_lang=EN&p_menu_id=210&p_session_id=38254329 |
||||||||||||||||
10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate | ||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
||||||||||||||||
10.7. Quality management - documentation | ||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||
10.7.1. Information and clarity | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||
11.1. Quality assurance | |||
The HCSO Quality Policy lays out the principles and commitments related to the quality of statistics. The documentis consistent with the goals set out in the Mission and Vision statements andwith the principles of the European Statistics Code of Practice and is publicly available on the HCSO website. The European Statistics Code of Practice is available on the website of the HCSO. Also, HCSO together with the member-organisations of the Hungarian Official Statistical Service created a National Statistics Code of Practice based on the European Statistics Code of Practice. Quality Guidelines are meant to ensure the quality of the statistical processes. The document has been in place since 2007 (1st revision in 2009, 2nd revision in 2014 and 3rd revision is currently ongoing). The latest version (2014) is available on the HCSO website. At HCSO, special attention is given to quality measurement, monitoring and documentation. Procedures are in place in order to ensure updated documentation on product quality. Apart from the internal reports, quality reports are regularly provided to Eurostat as well. All statistical processes of the national R&D survey were carried out in accordance with HCSO’s Quality Policy, Quality Guidelines and in line with the National Statistics Code of Practice that is consistent with the principles of the European Statistics Code of Practice. In the R&D data collection, principles relevant for the institutional environment, the statistical procedures and statistical output were observed. |
|||
11.2. Quality management - assessment | |||
As primary aspect, Commission Regulation was taken into account beside data requests of the other national and international users. All data providers receive a detailed guideline as an annex of the questionnaire, and contact details of our colleagues, who can help to fill the R&D questionnaire. The statistical processes and activities were supported by HCSO’s main, integrated, metadata-driven IT systems that are in line with the statistical planning and development conventions. Statistical processes of the R&D data collection were monitored based on quality indicators built into these IT systems (Integrated Survey Control System for Business and Social Surveys, Integrated Electronic Data Collection System, Integrated Data Processing System, Data Entry and Validation System). Main strength of the data collection: Organisations have to provide their R&D data through ELEKTRA, HCSO's online data collection system. Good quality for all variables were achieved by implementing a complex and consistent set of validation rules. Quality checks of interval level data were conducted and data were also confronted with data of the previous years. The HCSO's electronic registration system is used for incoming questionnaires. Reasons of nonresponse are also coded. The continous monitoring of the response rate was carried out. To increase resonse rate, after the survey deadline non-responding enterprises received several round of reminders by e-mail and by phone. The burden on data providers and data producers was also measured. The questionnaire includes a question on time spent on filling it. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.1. Relevance - User Needs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.1.1. Needs at national level | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) Users' class codification 1- Institutions: 2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level. 3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public. 4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.) 5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services) 6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3. Completeness | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.1. Data completeness - rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not available. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.2. Completeness - overview | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.
Criteria: A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply. B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.3. Data availability | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) Y-start year, N – data not available |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) Y-start year, N – data not available |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) Y-start year, N – data not available |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3.3.4. Data availability - other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional'). 2) Y-start year |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.1. Accuracy - overall | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).
Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted: 1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated. 2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise: a) Coverage errors, b) Measurement errors, c) Non response errors and d) Processing errors.
Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error' | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘. 2) The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat. 2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met. 3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria. 4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met. 5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.2. Sampling error | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3. Non-sampling error | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.1. Coverage error | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.
a) Description/assessment of coverage errors: An annually updated internal Register of Higher Education Institutions is used as a frame for the data collection (the data on the units is collected directly from the higher education institutions.) Therefore the frame and the target population do not diverge, there is no coverage error.
b) Measures taken to reduce their effect: Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.2. Measurement error | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.
a) Description/assessment of measurement errors: The difficulty for data providers to distinguish between purchased R&D services from fully contacted-out projects, and to calculate the FTE for external personnel can lead to measurement errors.
b) Measures taken to reduce their effect: Guidelines are provided in the filling instructions to help data providers distinguish between extramural and intramural R&D activities, and to deliniate fully contracted-out activities from purchased R&D services (which belong to intramural R&D activities). During data collection, R&D personnel data in FTE and the R&D expenditure data are continuously monitored. All interrelated data being provided is checked for logical consistency, and when problematic data is found, data providers are requested for correction. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.3. Non response error | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration. There are two elements of non-response: -Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit. -Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit. The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate. Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’. Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definition: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The first reminding e-mail was sent out 7 days before the deadline and the second was 7 days after the deadline. There is a third, a warning letter 15 days after the deadline. Those who did not send back the questionnaire after the third letter were contacted by phone as many times as neccessary. In case of no response after 60 days, the head of the higher-education institute unit was contacted. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.4. Processing error | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
13.3.5. Model assumption error | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
|
|||||||||||||||
14.1. Timeliness | |||||||||||||||
Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar. |
|||||||||||||||
14.1.1. Time lag - first result | |||||||||||||||
Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
a) End of reference period: December 31, 2021 b) Date of first release of national data: October 12, 2022 c) Lag (days): 285 |
|||||||||||||||
14.1.2. Time lag - final result | |||||||||||||||
a) End of reference period: December 31, 2021 b) Date of first release of national data: June 28, 2023 c) Lag (days): 544 |
|||||||||||||||
14.2. Punctuality | |||||||||||||||
Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially. |
|||||||||||||||
14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication | |||||||||||||||
Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release) |
|||||||||||||||
14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission | |||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1. Comparability - geographical | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.2. General issues of comparability | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No deviation from FM2015 and Eurostat Methodological Guidelines. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts/issues.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2. Comparability - over time | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.1. Length of comparable time series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.2. Breaks in time series | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1) Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Are the data produced in the same way in the odd and even years? If no, please explain the main differences. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3. Coherence - cross domain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics. The education statistics (UNESCO/OECD/Eurostat (UOE)) include R&D expenditure in tertiary educational institutions and follow the recommendations of the Frascati manual regarding the definition of R&D expenditure. Due to the differences in the coverage some differences in the two datasets (UOE questionnaire and the R&D HES surveys) are expected. However, there is a need to ensure that a harmonised approach is used for compiling data in the two domains. The two statistical domains should aim for a consistent use of R&D coefficients for splitting teaching and research time. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coherence with SNA is aimed at in the R&D data collection. Regarding the sectoralisation of units in HES, the FM2015 recommendations are followed. The SNA calculation takes into account R&D data (e.g..: data on software development). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not National Coherence Assessments are used.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.3.4. Coherence – Education statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Education data is collected by a seperate government entity (Ministry), and not by the Hungarian Statistical Office (HCSO). HCSO uses the education data to calculate/estimate some optional data (e.g. seniority level of R&D personnnel) for the R&D statistics in the HES sector. HCSO collects R&D expenditure data directly from the units in the HES sector, within the R&D data collection framework. Conceptually there is no difference between the two statistical domains on R&D expenditure data. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.4. Coherence - internal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(1) Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.). (2) Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel). |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
16.1. Costs summary | |||||||||||||||||||||
1) The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies. |
|||||||||||||||||||||
16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached | |||||||||||||||||||||
1) T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’) |
|
|||
17.1. Data revision - policy | |||
Not requested. |
|||
17.2. Data revision - practice | |||
Not requested. |
|||
17.2.1. Data revision - average size | |||
Not requested. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.1. Source data | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.1.1. Data source – general information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.2. Frequency of data collection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See 12.3.3. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.3. Data collection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.3.1. Data collection overview | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annexes: R&D_HES_2021_questionnaire R&D_HES_2021_explanatory notes |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.4. Data validation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We continously monitored the response rate and we compared it with the statistics of the previous cycle. We also compered the data received with relevant external (eg. Ministry) data source. We investigated inconsistencies in the statistics. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.5. Data compilation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
See below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.5.1. Imputation - rate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not applicable (there is no imputation used). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.5.2. Data compilation methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.5.3. Methodology for derivation of R&D coefficients | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.5.4. Measurement issues | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.5.5. Weighting and estimation methods | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.6. Adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not requested. |
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||