Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Science and Technology Unit

1.5. Contact mail address
Avenida de Manoteras 50-52 , planta 3 modulo 324
28050 Madrid (Spain)


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 27/02/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 27/02/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 27/02/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on higher education R&D (HERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the higher education sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the higher education sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics.

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

 

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 FORD Fields of Research and Development
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  Information already given in the section 3.1.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  Data are available for all six broad categories of FORD
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  Socio-economic objectives (NABS 2007) are requested at chapter level
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Higher education sector Partial inclusion. See below 
     Tertiary education institution  Partial inclusion. See below
     University and colleges: core of the sector Partial inclusion. University-related institutes administered by the Higher Council for Scientific Research are included in the government sector because they are controlled and funded by the State and, as a general rule, do not provide higher education services.
     University hospitals and clinics Partial inclusion. Several university hospitals are included in this sector. The other university hospitals are included in the Government sector as they are administered by the State.
     HES Borderline institutions Total inclusion.
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to HES No 
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  not available
External R&D personnel  All post-graduate students are included in the number of researchers in the higher education sector, as well as their funding in the HES.
Clinical trials  not covered
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  Data of funding from abroad are available by sector.
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  Data of payments to abroad (for external R&D) are available by sector.
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Extramural expenditure is requested in the questionnaire for all sectors, following the breakdown recommended by the Frascati Manual.
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar year.
Source of funds  Broken down into main disaggregation by sector as shown table 4.3.
Type of R&D  Based on current intramural cost on R&D.
Type of costs  The breakdown of the type of cost is the following: Labour costs (Researcher’s labour cost, Technicians and other staff’s cost), Other current costs (broken down into expenses corresponding to external R&D personnel, expenses corresponding to purchase of services, expenses corresponding to purchase of materials and other current costs), Lands&buildings, Instruments&equipment, Software for R&D and other intellectual property products.
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  Defence GERD is underestimated in that the estimate of expenditure is based on the socio-economic objective "Defence".
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  Total number of persons engaged in R&D during the calendar year.
Function  Data available.
Qualification  Data are now available as the breakdown used is comparable from 2006 onwards for researchers and total personnel.
Age  Since 2007, it is available for researchers.
Citizenship  Since 2007, it is available for researchers.
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Total number of persons engaged in R&D during the calendar year.
Function  Data available.
Qualification  Data are now available as the breakdown used is comparable from 2006 onwards for researchers and total personnel.
Age  Data not available.
Citizenship  Data not available.
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

FTE is calculated according to Frascati Manual, using the concept person/year.
All postgraduate students working on R&D are included in R&D personnel and their salaries/scholarship are included in the R&D expenditure.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 Only Total R&D personnel and Researchers are cross-classified by occupation and qualification. Depending on the sector:
- BES: only FTE.
- GOV, HES, PNP: HC and FTE
   
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

Statistical units are universities, foundations serving higher education, technological institutes, other research centers and high schools teaching higher education, all of them with legal entity, both public and private ownership centers. There is a directory of organizations and centers that performed R&D in previous years or are potentially R&D performers (DIRID).

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the HES Sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  Units that are performers or potential performers of R&D activities.  
Estimation of the target population size  195 units  
3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Indicators are available according to 4 units of measure:

 

Whole number for number of units or number of R&D personnel in headcount.

Number with a decimal place for number of R&D personnel in full-time equivalent.

Thousands of euros for all financial variables, i.e. Turnover or R&D expenditure.

Percentage, the ratio between the selected combinations of indicators.


5. Reference Period Top

All questions and indicators refer to the calendar year


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  We follow the recommendations of the European Statistics Code of Practice made by EUROSTAT. 
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  There is no R&D specific statistical legislation.
Legal acts  The compilation and dissemination of the data are governed by the Statistical Law No. 12/1989 "Public Statistical Function" of May 9, 1989, and Law No. 4/1990 of June 29 on “National Budget of State for the year 1990" amended by Law No. 13/1996 "Fiscal, administrative and social measures" of December 30, 1996, makes compulsory all statistics included in the National Statistics Plan. The National Statistics Plan 2021-2024, approved by Royal Decree 1110/2020, on 15th December, is the Plan currently implemented. This statistical operation has governmental purposes, and it is included in the National Statistics Plan 2021-2024.
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Regulated by the Statistical Law No. 12/1989 "Public Statistical Function" of May 9, 1989
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  Regulated by the Statistical Law No. 12/1989 "Public Statistical Function" of May 9, 1989
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  Regulated by the Statistical Law No. 12/1989 "Public Statistical Function" of May 9, 1989
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Regulated by the Statistical Law No. 12/1989 "Public Statistical Function" of May 9, 1989
Planned changes of legislation  Does not apply
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 In Spain, the main national legal regulations applicable to the protection of statistical data are: 
-“Ley Orgánica 15/1999 de Protección de Datos de Carácter Personal” 
-“Ley 12/1989 de la Función Estadística Pública” 
-“Real Decreto 428/1993, de 26 de marzo, por el que se aprueba el Estatuto de la Agencia de Protección de Datos”. 
-“Real Decreto 994/1999, de 11 de junio, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento de medidas de seguridad de los ficheros automatizados que contengan datos de carácter personal”.

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

Survey staff must sign a legal contract, ensuring the acknowledge of the confidentiality issues and data protection law, and therefore they also have legal commitments.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

R&D data deliveries to Eurostat are checked in order to avoid primary and secondary confidentiality. This is done by checking any cell with less than 3 population units, and properly  modifying the table to avoid also secondary disclosure.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

The advance release calendar that shows the precise release dates for the coming year is disseminated in the last quarter of each year.

8.2. Release calendar access

The calendar is disseminated on the INEs Internet website (Publications Calendar)

8.3. Release policy - user access

The data are released simultaneously according to the advance release calendar to all interested parties by issuing the press release. At the same time, the data are posted on the INE's Internet website (www.ine.es/en) almost immediately after the press release is issued. Also some predefined tailor-made requests are sent to registered users. Some users could receive partial information under embargo as it is publicly described in the European Statistics Code of Practice


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

It is disseminated yearly.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y  Main results are published in a press release.
Ad-hoc releases  Y  There is the possibility of requesting customised information from the INE User Care Department. At the time of processing said requests, this considers limitations regarding confidentiality or precision.

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 N  -
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  -

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

INEbase is the system the INE uses to store statistical information on the Internet. It contains all the information the INE produces in electronic formats. The primary organisation of the information follows the theme-based classification of the Inventory of Statistical Operations of the State General Administration . The basic unit of INEbase is the statistical operation, defined as the set of activities that lead to obtaining statistical results on a determined sector or topic using data collected individually

Tables and time series may be viewed in INEbase, within the "Science and technology" section at www.ine.es

https://ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176754&menu=metodologia&idp=1254735576669

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  

That research that wishes to gain access to the microdata must sign an agreement with the National Statistics Institute for access, for statistical purposes, by research personnel, to confidential INE data. The agreement describes the project and the need to access said microdata, specifies the period during which the research team will work in the INE, provides the name of the research team and establishes the agreement clauses, including the statistical confidentiality clause.

This access shall be made through the so-called Secure Place, which consists of computers where said databases are available, and which verify a series of physical and technological provisions to protect the security and integrity of the statistical databases, which in practice implies that strict protocols are applied to those external users who wish to access the microdata for research purposes. The Secure Place is available, not only at the Central Services of the INE, but also in the Provincial Delegations.
Access cost policy  Products and Services/Information prices (See 'Information prices'). Prices of dissemination products from the National Statistics Institute (INE) were established in the Resolution on 7 October 2014 by the President of the National Statistics Institute by which the private prices for dissemination products of the body are established. (BOE 252, 17 October 2014).
Micro-data anonymisation rules  We supress every sensitive information that can disclose a unit
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  yes    

Apart from press release and the on-line database, there is no other type of data dissemination.

From our point of view, the web-site offer R&D data with clarity and with an adequate structure. The accessibility to the data results is free.
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  yes    More specific requirements of information made by national and international institutions as well as individual users can be fulfilled under request, but keeping statistical secrecy in any case.
Other  not available    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

https://ine.es/en/daco/daco43/metoi+d21_en.pdf

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   In order to facilitate the adequate comprehension and use of data, some documents are also published together with them . These documents are:
- a general methodology (including concepts and background of the survey, scope, statistical unit used, variables and its definitions, sample design, collection of information, processing of information, tabulation of results).
- a model questionnaire used for the collection of the survey .
- some more information related to the issue is also available in the website (link to R&D data in Eurostat web page, national time series).
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  Besides, if a user have any request or doubt concerning the data or metadata, it is possible to contact with the Science and Technology Unit (via an electronic template) in order to obtain a more extended response or clarification.
Measure to increase clarity Before sending out the questionnaires, we convene all interested units to a meeting where we explain how to respond to the questionnaire and solve any potential doubts they may have.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   The impression is positive.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Quality assurance framework for the INE statistics is based on the ESSCoP, the European Statistics Code of Practice made by EUROSTAT.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

 - Actions for increasing the rate of response in surveys:

     - We use the helping approach: a strategy of specifically requesting help as a way to compel participation.

     - We try to conduct a well-designed, attractive survey in order to be easier to complete it.

     - The use of multiple contacts with members of the sample. We contact non-respondents using combination of messages and surveys.

- Quality management in data processing: A check list of the different ways a data set is validated (internal consistency checks, non-zero values, number of records in is equal to number of records out) combined with responses with various outcomes (weak error and strong error)

- Annual mandatory survey with high response rate.

- Time series available.

- Methodology of the survey in line with the Frascati Manual.

- Full compliance of the Commission Regulation No 995/2012.

- Overall quality of data deemed to be very good.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1 European level  The European Commission.   Data used for indicators.
  1 National level  Ministries and Public Authorities  Data used for policy-making and
assessment of R&D phenomena
 1 National level  National Statistical Office  Data used for annual publication on
R&D
 1 Regional level   Local authorities  Data used for policy-making and
assessment of R&D phenomena

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  The INE conducted five general surveys of user satisfaction in 2007, 2010, 2013, 2016 and 2019.
The specific needs of users are also taken into account when revising the survey design, in order to adapt the content of the survey to the specific requirements of its users, increasing the level of satisfaction.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  No, it covers all the statistical operations of the institution.
Short description of the feedback received  not available
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

not available

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  X          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  X          
Optional data on R&D expenditure  X          
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  X          
Optional data on R&D personnel  X          
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  X          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y  Annual.        
Type of R&D  Y  Annual.        
Type of costs  Y  Annual.    Since 2012, consultancy costs are included as a category in the breakdown of the type of ‘Other current costs’    
Socioeconomic objective  Y-1995  Biennial.
From 1999, annual.
       
Region  Y  Annual.        
FORD  Y  Annual.        
Type of institution  Y  Annual.        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1997  Biennial. 
From 2002, annual.
 Even years till 2001.      
Function  Y  Annual        
Qualification  Y-1995-2003
Y-2006
 Biennial, available till 2003.
From 2006, annual.
 Even years till 2003.      
Age  Y  From 2007,annual    Only for researchers    
Citizenship  Y  From 2007,annual    Only for researchers    
Region  Y  Annual        
FORD  Y  Biennial. From 2002, annual.  Even years till 2001.      
Type of institution  Y  Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1995  Biennial. From 2002, annual.  Even years till 2001.      
Function  Y  Annual        
Qualification  Y-1995-2002
Y-2006
 Biennial, available till 2002.
From 2006, annual.
 Even years till 2001.      
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  Y  Annual        
FORD  Y  Annual        
Type of institution  Y  Annual        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 Extramural R&D expenditure  Y-1999  Annual      
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  -  4 4 5 +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE +/- 
Researchers in FTE +/- 

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure    X      
Total R&D personnel in FTE    X      
Researchers in FTE    X      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Statistics on R&D Activities are a census operation, so there are no sampling errors.

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise  not applicable
Government  not applicable
Higher education  not applicable
Private non-profit  not applicable
Rest of the world  not applicable
Total  not applicable
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Function Researchers  not applicable
Technicians  not applicable
Other support staff  not applicable
Qualification ISCED 8  not applicable
ISCED 5-7  not applicable
ISCED 4 and below  not applicable
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 There are units that are misclassified in other sectors

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 On the one hand, we ask the Frascati tree in every questionnaire in order to detect units that are misclassified. On the other hand, we ask for information about R&D grants to national organisms/public enterprises that offer this type of grants.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

1,03%

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 

R&D concepts are very complex, so measurement errors are usual.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 Explanatory notes are included in the questionnaire throughout and there is a glossary with a detail description of concepts as well as some examples according to the sector. The field works are conducted by the S&T unit, therefore the staff involved in the collection of data is well-trained and experienced in the theme. To this end, manuals and training documents are also available. Besides, there are different checking and validation routines to detect any measurement error during the whole data collection.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
 193 195  0,01
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
 R&D expenditure  1,03%  
 R&D Personnel in FTE
 1,03%  
 R&D Researchers in FTE  1,03%  
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

There are two written official reminders before the organization is fined, as the completion of the survey is mandatory. Nevertheless, the organization can be contacted by phone, fax or e-mail during the process of data collection.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  The process starts with the collection of the questionnaire. Therefore people who treat the data can correct the register adequately and phone the organization to request the proper information needed. After data entry is finalized, we proceed to the computer coding. The programme used for this stage is CS-PRO, as a tool for interfacing with the questionnaire, accessing extended information about the unit and making the appropriate changes. After the coding, a second data checking is carried out in order to minimize the processing errors. In this stage, SAS programmes are used for a second checking of logical and consistency errors, as well as comparing data with information available of previous years or other data sources. Unit can be contacted again by phone, fax or e-mail if necessary.
Estimates of data entry errors  
Variables for which coding was performed  
Estimates of coding errors  
Editing process and method  

In a first stage, we checked two different types of errors from census data:

- Firstly, detecting out of range or invalid values produced in the editing process or due to a mistake in the completion of the questionnaire.

- Secondly, detecting inconsistent values produced in the editing process or due to a mistake in the completion of the questionnaire. These errors include also the detection of item non-response. When the field work is done, data is checked and validated, using our own SAS programmes, although the unit can still be contacted by phone, fax or e-mail.
Procedure used to correct errors Mainly re-contact with the information provider, logical relations between different questions, checks against other variables available (historical R&D data, annual accounts, web sites…). Census data.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period:31/12/2021

b) Date of first release of national data:31/10/2022

c) Lag (days):305

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period:31/12/2021

b) Date of first release of national data:30/06/2023

c) Lag (days):547

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  18
Delay (days)     
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

No deviations from recommendations

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197  or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts/issues.

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).   NO  
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39.   NO  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with Eurostat'EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25   NO  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).   NO  
Statistical unit FM2015 §3.70 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO  
Target population FM2015 §9.6 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO  
Sector coverage FM2015 §3.67-3.69 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO   
Post-secondary (non university / college) education institutions FM2015 §9.12 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO  
Hospitals and clinics FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO  
Borderline research institutions FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).   NO  
Major fields of science and technology coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18    NO  
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18    NO  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method   NO  
Survey questionnaire / data collection form   NO  
Cooperation with respondents   NO  
Coverage of external funds   NO  
Distinction between GUF and other sources – Sector considered as source of funds for GUF   NO  
Data processing methods   NO  
Treatment of non-response    
Variance estimation    
Method of deriving R&D coefficients    
Quality of R&D coefficients    
Data compilation of final and preliminary data   NO  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)  17  2002, 1994, 1989, 1980  2002:Occasional R&D is included. 
1994:Due to the availability of the breakdown of support personnel between Technician and other in the higher education sector, the corresponding categories for total R&D personnel are no longer underestimated. 1989:With the inclusion of R&D support personnel in higher education, the number of R&D personnel in the higher education sector and the national total are no longer underestimated.
1980:- The series for R&D expenditure and personnel in the higher education sector were revised upward and retrospectively to 1980 to allow for a change in the method of evaluating the 1988 data following the 1989-90 survey on the allocation of teachers working time. Furthermore, from 1980 onwards the R&D personnel series were retroactively revised upwards to take account of changes made to the method of evaluating 1988 data further to the survey on timetables of teaching staff in 1989-90, the most significant results of which were as follows: University professors currently devote approximately 40% of their time to R&D. The proportion was formerly 33%, a percentage generally accepted in the university context. In addition to professors and lecturers, considered to be research personnel, there are also other categories of university professors who are engaged in research.
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D personnel (FTE)  17  2002, 1994, 1989, 1980  2002:Occasional R&D is included. 
1994:Due to the availability of the breakdown of support personnel between Technician and other in the higher education sector, the corresponding categories for total R&D personnel are no longer underestimated. 1989:With the inclusion of R&D support personnel in higher education, the number of R&D personnel in the higher education sector and the national total are no longer underestimated.
1980:- The series for R&D expenditure and personnel in the higher education sector were revised upward and retrospectively to 1980 to allow for a change in the method of evaluating the 1988 data following the 1989-90 survey on the allocation of teachers working time. Furthermore, from 1980 onwards the R&D personnel series were retroactively revised upwards to take account of changes made to the method of evaluating 1988 data further to the survey on timetables of teaching staff in 1989-90, the most significant results of which were as follows: University professors currently devote approximately 40% of their time to R&D. The proportion was formerly 33%, a percentage generally accepted in the university context. In addition to professors and lecturers, considered to be research personnel, there are also other categories of university professors who are engaged in research.
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D expenditure  17  2002, 1992, 1980  2002:Occasional R&D is included. 
1992:- Costs for technicians and other support personnel in the higher education sector, previously not included, are incorporated in R&D expenditure for this sector. The method of estimating current and capital R&D expenditure by the higher education sector changed and the relevant data are now collected by a questionnaire sent to universities, which provide estimates. There was an upward re-estimation of GUF, causing a break in series in financing of HERD. 
1980: GERD are not comparable to those in earlier years due to the inclusion of GUF. The series for R&D expenditure and personnel in the higher education sector were revised upward and retrospectively to 1980 to allow for a change in the method of evaluating the 1988 data following the 1989-90 survey on the allocation of teachers working time. Furthermore, from 1980 onwards the R&D personnel series were retroactively revised upwards to take account of changes made to the method of evaluating 1988 data further to the survey on timetables of teaching staff in 1989-90, the most significant results of which were as follows: University professors currently devote approximately 40% of their time to R&D. The proportion was formerly 33%, a percentage generally accepted in the university context. In addition to professors and lecturers, considered to be research personnel, there are also other categories of university professors who are engaged in research.
Source of funds    1995   In 1995, financing of R&D in the higher education sector was revised: own funds were reported separately from the general university funds (GUF) in which they had hitherto been included.
Type of costs      
Type of R&D      
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

See below.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

On the one hand, the classification used for R&D data collection activities is compatible with the SNA institutional classification, with the exception of the higher education sector, which is identified as a separate sector because of its prominence in R&D activities.

On the other hand, R&D data in the SNA calculations allows, apart from translating R&D expenditure data into a SNA compatible format, computing R&D capital stock and its appropriate deflators.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
           No other source available
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Education statistics

See below.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – HERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  4586993  88227  69984
Final data (delivered T+18)  4586993  88227  69984
Difference (of final data)  0  0  0
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  38947
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  16316

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs    
Data collection costs    
Other costs    
Total costs  226460  5%
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)    
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  not available  
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  not available  
Total cost  not available  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  "Estadistica sobre Actividades de I+D".
Type of survey  There is a directory of organizations and centres that performed R&D in previous years, that is covered exhaustively via a census. This directory is updated yearly with new centers.
Combination of sample survey and census data  
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  195
Variables the survey contributes to  All variables.
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  The questionnaires are launched in the 2Q; data collection is carried out during the 2 and 3Q and the first results are published in November.
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  The statistical unit is the one with legal entity.    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size      
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame  There is a directory of organizations and centers that performed R&D in previous years, that is covered exhaustively. This directory is updated yearly with new centers.    
Sample design      
Sample size      
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  Do not apply
Description of collected data / statistics  Do not apply
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  Do not apply
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider  For universities, we send the questionnaires to the research vice chancellor and for the rest of units, the questionnaire is sent to the director of the unit.
Description of collected information  
Data collection method  The data collection method is by electronic questionnaire (100% in 2017). The information is collected directly from the S&T Unit.
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients  
Realised sample size (per stratum)  
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.)  
Incentives used for increasing response  
Follow-up of non-respondents  
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  98,97%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  i+des21_en.pdf
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  i+des21_cues.pdf
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  metoi+d21_en.pdf
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  metoi+d21.pdf


Annexes:
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language
18.4. Data validation

The responses rate are checked.
Statistics are compared both over time and between regions.
A micro and macro editing is performed in order to capture inconsistencies using CSPRO and SAS programs.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

R&D Expenditure 3,59% 

R%D Personnel 3,59%

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  The R&D survey is carried out annually.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Preliminary data is sent to Eurostat in T+10 according to Regulation, and it is compiled on the basis of data collection for the reference year.
18.5.3. Methodology for derivation of R&D coefficients
National methodology for their derivation.  
Revision policy for the coefficients  
Issues that affect their quality (e.g. date of last update, aggregation level at which they are computed, etc).  
18.5.4. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  According to Frascati Manual, with a dedicate section in the questionnaire.
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  Those who compile the statistics use their own assumptions.
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  Enterprises do not include VAT in R&D expenditure in view of the VAT accounting procedures followed by Spanish enterprises. Accordingly, VAT is not included in the R&D expenditure of other sectors.
Depreciation is also excluded in the measurement of expenditures in all sectors.
Treatment and calculation of GUF source of funds / separation from “Direct government funds”   The own funds of the higher education sector are reported separately from general university funds (GUF).
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  
18.5.5. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method  A census is carried out
Description of the estimation method  If a unit engaged in R&D fails to report its data, we pursue it until the data is sent to us. In some instances, if a unit did not send us its data, we keep the data constant for the respective year.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top