Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

MERI (Monitoring and Evaluation of Research and Innovation)

1.5. Contact mail address

WTC III

Avenue Simon Bolivar 30

1000 Brussels


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 27/10/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 23/10/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 27/10/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on higher education R&D (HERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the higher education sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the higher education sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics(EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics) complements this with guidelines for further harmonisation among EU, EFTA and candidate countries.

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 N/A  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  Frascati Manual definition
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  Frascati Manual definition
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  Frascati Manual definition
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Higher education sector  included
     Tertiary education institution  included
     University and colleges: core of the sector  included
     University hospitals and clinics  included for the Flemish community
     HES Borderline institutions  none
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to HES  none
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  included
External R&D personnel  included
Clinical trials  phase 1 - 3 included
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  included
Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability  not included
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  Guidance and definitions provided in the survey
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  None for the HES sector
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Every calender year
Source of funds  Per sector (BES, GOV, HES, PNP, FOR)
Type of R&D  available from 2016 
Type of costs  included
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  not included
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  every calender year
Function  Researcher - R&D personnel
Qualification  Doctorate (ISCED 8), master (ISCED 7), bachelor (ISCED 6), other (ISCED 5 or lower)
Age  not included
Citizenship  not included
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Every calender year
Function  Researcher - all R&D personnel
Qualification Doctorate (ISCED 8), master (ISCED 7), bachelor (ISCED 6), other (ISCED 5 or lower)
Age  not included
Citizenship  not included
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

The survey asks for several tables to be filled in for FTEs. If the information for a variable is not directly available, estimations are made based on the ratio HC/FTE for similar organisation (sector, size, fields of research).

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 by function  HES organsation  every calender year
 by qualification  HES organsation  every calender year
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit is the institutional unit as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993, if there are deviations please explain.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the HES Sector should consist of all R&D performing institutional units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  All HE organisations same
Estimation of the target population size  70 same
3.7. Reference area

R&D statistics cover national and regional data.

3.8. Coverage - Time

The survey is conducted annually, for the previous calender year.

3.9. Base period

The base year for the unit Purchasing Power Standard (PPS) and PPS per inhabitant at constant prices is currently 2005. All calculations of non-basic unit (national currencies) are done by Eurostat.


4. Unit of measure Top

Administrative or legal entity


5. Reference Period Top

2020-2021


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020.
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  As a member state of the European Union we are obliged to apply this Regulation
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  There is no R&D specific statistical legislation. The production of national R&D statistics is governed by the general national statistical legislation.
Legal acts  1962 law on government statistics
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Planned changes of legislation  none
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Aggregated data are available on the Belgian federal Science Policy website and the websites of regional authorities for research; access to microdata by third parties needs to be approved by all data providers.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

GDPR
Criteria enshrined in belgian 1962 statistics law.

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

Code of conduct for government officials.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

All legal directives are followed.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

1 July 2023 (after data are approved by all competent authorties within Belgium and reported to Eurostat)

8.2. Release calendar access

1 July 2023 (after data are approved by all competent authorties within Belgium and reported to Eurostat)

8.3. Release policy - user access

1 July 2023 (after data are approved by all competent authorties within Belgium and reported to Eurostat)


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Every 2 years


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  yes  MERI data (belspo.be)
Ad-hoc releases  yes  MERI data (belspo.be)

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 yes  MERI data (belspo.be)
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 yes  MERI data (belspo.be)

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

see below

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

N/A

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Aggregated data are publicly available.
Access cost policy  free of charge
Micro-data anonymisation rules  yes
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

N/A

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  yes  aggregated data  
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  yes  bith aggregeted and microdata  
Other  no    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

see below

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Metadata are complete except for user statistics, which we don't have at the moment.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Both paper or electronic publications contain methodologies and refer back to data sources.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  The requests received concern additional information rather than clarifications. 
Measure to increase clarity  not necessary
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   ok


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

After the conclusion of every survey (annually), there is an evaluation planned with all competent authorities to evaluate the past survey en prepare for the next.

All results are discussed with all data providers and feedback is incoprorated in next steps.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

See above


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 4  researchers  research and publications
 3  media  information for the public
 2  social actors  context for activities
     

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  We evaluate with the participating regional and community authorities if the data assembled corrsepond to policy needs and if the quality is sufficient.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  

 We organised a survey on data use and customer satisfaction in 2023

Short description of the feedback received  Results not analysed yet
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Good or very good.

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  x          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure          
Optional data on R&D expenditure    x        
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  x          
Optional data on R&D personnel    x        
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  x          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  yes  annually        
Type of R&D  yes  annually  2008-2016     abandoned because of very low item response, reintroduced because obligatory variable
Type of costs  yes  annually        
Socioeconomic objective  yes   annually  2020      requested by Eurostat
Region  yes  annually        
FORD  yes  annually        
Type of institution  yes  annually        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  yes  annually        
Function  yes  annually    researchers/supporting staff/technicians > only distinction researchers and allsupporting staff  2016  change in legislation
Qualification  yes  annually        
Age  no          
Citizenship no           
Region  yes  annually        
FORD  yes  annually        
Type of institution  yes  annually        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  yes  annually        
Function  yes  annually    researchers/supporting staff/technicians > only distinction researchers and all supporting staff  2016  change in legislation
Qualification  yes  annually        
Age  no          
Citizenship no           
Region  yes  annually        
FORD  yes  annually        
Type of institution  yes  annually        

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 none          
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  - 4 2 1 4  -  -
Total R&D personnel in FTE
Researchers in FTE 4

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure    x      
Total R&D personnel in FTE        
Researchers in FTE        

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Not applicable: census survey

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise  N/A
Government  N/A
Higher education  N/A
Private non-profit  N/A
Rest of the world  N/A
Total  N/A
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Function Researchers  N/A
Technicians  N/A
Other support staff  N/A
Qualification ISCED 8  N/A
ISCED 5-7  N/A
ISCED 4 and below  N/A 
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 None, sector is well known

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Not applicable

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not applicable

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

The concept of 'researcher' interpreted too broadly (more often then too narrowly) is the most common problem.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Contextual information (website, nature of the institution) and direct contact with respondent before any data are effectively adjusted. 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
 49  70 30%
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
 R&D expenditure 23  
 FORD 27  
     
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

Reminders by phone and email

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  respondent fills in online survey directly, or transfers data to us via excel sheet
Estimates of data entry errors  0
Variables for which coding was performed  all variables for excel surveys
Estimates of coding errors  0
Editing process and method  conscienciously
Procedure used to correct errors  checks programmed in database
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31 December 2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 1 July 2023

c) Lag (days): 540 (18 months)

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31 December 2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 1 July 2023

c) Lag (days): 540 (18 months)

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  18
Delay (days)   0  0
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

French speaking university hospitals do not respond to the survey (yet), while Dutch speaking university hospitals' data are included.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197  or Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts/issues.

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  None  
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39.  None  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with Eurostat'EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  None  
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  None  
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25  None  
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  None
 
Statistical unit FM2015 §3.70 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  None  
Target population FM2015 §9.6 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  None  
Sector coverage FM2015 §3.67-3.69 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  None   
Post-secondary (non university / college) education institutions FM2015 §9.12 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  None  
Hospitals and clinics FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  Yes  no data available for French speaking university hospitals
Borderline research institutions FM2015 §9.13-9.17,  §9.109-9.112 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).  None  
Major fields of science and technology coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   None  
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18   None  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method  None  
Survey questionnaire / data collection form  None  
Cooperation with respondents  None  
Coverage of external funds  None  
Distinction between GUF and other sources – Sector considered as source of funds for GUF  None  
Data processing methods  None  
Treatment of non-response  None  
Variance estimation  Not applicable - census  
Method of deriving R&D coefficients  None  
Quality of R&D coefficients  None  
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  None  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

From 2002 onwards

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)  2002 -  None  
  Function  2002 -   from  2016  "technicians" no longer distnguished within all personnel.
  Qualification  2002 -   None  
R&D personnel (FTE)  2002 -    None   
  Function  2002 -   from 2016   "technicians" no longer distnguished within all personnel.
  Qualification  2002 -   None  
R&D expenditure  2000 -   None

 

 
Source of funds  2000 -   None  
Type of costs  2000 -   None  
Type of R&D  2000 -   no data between 2008 and 2016  item respons very low 
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Are the data produced in the same way in the odd and even years? If no, please explain the main differences.

Data are collected annually in the same way.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics. The education statistics (UNESCO/OECD/Eurostat (UOE)) include R&D expenditure in tertiary educational institutions and follow the recommendations of the Frascati manual regarding the definition of R&D expenditure. Due to the differences in the coverage some differences in the two datasets (UOE questionnaire and the R&D HES surveys) are expected. However, there is a need to ensure that a harmonised approach is used for compiling data in the two domains. The two statistical domains should aim for a consistent use of R&D coefficients for splitting teaching and research time.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Annual survey and compiling of statistics, high coherence.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

High - the National bank uses our R&D data.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
Not applicable          
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Education statistics

Not applicable - no overlap, no collaborations.

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – HERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  2 477 896, 121  24 984  19 831
Final data (delivered T+18)  2 799 241, 917  28 349  22 175
Difference (of final data)  + 321 345,796  3 365  2 344
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  highly consistent
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  lower consistency (distinction internal/external personnel fro the first time applied for data 2021)

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  1 FTE and 1 part time IT  
Data collection costs  none - oline survey  
Other costs  none  
Total costs confidential  
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  49  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  between 4 hours and 2 weeks  
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  confidential  
Total cost  confidential  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

All microdata are revised for internal (within survey) and external (with previous data) consistency.

17.2. Data revision - practice

see above

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  R&D in the higher education sector - Survey
Type of survey  census
Combination of sample survey and census data  N/A
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  N/A
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  N/A
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  N/A
Variables the survey contributes to  N/A
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  Expected by 1 December 2023: data for 2022.
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  N/A    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)  N/A    
Stratification variable classes  N/A    
Population size  70 institutions    
Planned sample size  N/A    
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)  N/A    
Survey frame  N/A    
Sample design  N/A    
Sample size  N/A    
Survey frame quality  N/A    
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  
Description of collected data / statistics  N/A
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  N/A
18.2. Frequency of data collection

Annually

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider  All R&D active HE organsations
Description of collected information  All obligatory variables (see annex Regulation)
Data collection method  census survey
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients  Applied by  regional authorities, competent for research policy
Realised sample size (per stratum)  N/A
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.)  online survey or excel form
Incentives used for increasing response  reminders by mail or phone
Follow-up of non-respondents  reminders by mail or phone
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  N/A (census)
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility) 70%
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  N/A
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  R&D in higher education institutions - survey (in Dutch and French)
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  


Annexes:
French language survey for HES
Dutch language survey for HES
18.4. Data validation

Internal (within survey: consistency with other variables) and external (consistency with earlier respons)

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

For individual institutions, based on previously delivered data. Imputations for 21 institutions done.

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  Annual survey
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Annual survey 
18.5.3. Methodology for derivation of R&D coefficients
National methodology for their derivation.  regional competency
Revision policy for the coefficients  N/A
Issues that affect their quality (e.g. date of last update, aggregation level at which they are computed, etc).  N/A
18.5.4. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  Pro rata distribution for all variables, based on % of reserachers working in certain postal codes.
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  depending on organisation/competent regional authorities
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  VAT is excluded
Treatment and calculation of GUF source of funds / separation from “Direct government funds”   yes
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  none
18.5.5. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method  N/A
Description of the estimation method Consumption price index applied to previous expenditure data; personnel data copied as was
18.6. Adjustment

None

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

None


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top