Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Ministry of higher education and research (France)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministry of higher education and research (France)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department of statistical studies on research

SIES - Sub-Directorate for Information Systems and Statistical Studies

1.5. Contact mail address

Ministère de l'enseignement supérieur et de la recherche

SIES - A2.2

1 rue Descartes

75231 Paris Cedex 05


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 08/05/2024
2.2. Metadata last posted 08/05/2024
2.3. Metadata last update 08/05/2024


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Government R&D (GOVERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the Government sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Government sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by the European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system
  • The local units for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics;
  • The fields of research and development are based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 We use the FM 2015 as reference.   
The interadministrative nomenclature of legal categories   

The legal category describes the legal status of the enterprise. For corporate bodies it is determined from the declaration completed when the enterprise is created. For public bodies, the legal category is determined from the regulatory text produced when it was created. The interadministrative nomenclature of legal categories acts as a common reference for all administrations, bodies associated with the Sirene register and with procedures at centres for business formalities.

It is used to distinguish the 

- EPIC : Public establishment of an industrial and commercial nature

- EPST : Public Scientific and Technical Research Establishment 

- EPA : Public establishment of an administrative nature

   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  Frascati Manual 2015 Chapter 2 - mainly paragraphs 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4
Fields of Research and Development (FORD) We use twelve (12) fields. Eleven (11) of them are covered by the six (6) fields recommanded in the FM 2015 and the last one is  "The R&D management". Only GERD and researchers in headcount are disaggregated by FORD
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  No data available by SEO for government establishments.

 

 

3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Government sector

Public administrations and agencies, with the exception of the CNRS (National Centre for Scientific Research) which is included in the higher education sector for the data disseminated through Eurostat and OECD but belong to GOV for the national data disseminated. They are classified as EPIC, EPST and EPA.

In 1992, France Télécom and GIAT Industries were transferred from the survey of public bodies and are now included in the business enterprise population.
In 1972, the former Gunpowder Directorate in the Ministry of Defence became the Société nationale des poudres et explosifs (SNPE) and was transferred from the Government to the business enterprise sector.

Hospitals and clinics  University hospitals and cancer treatment center are included in surveys covering the HES sector.
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to GOV  No
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  There is no deviation from the FM 2015. 
External R&D personnel The treatment of external personnel in R&D expenditure and R&D personnel is compliant with FM §5.20-5.23, Table 5.2. Included categories of external personnel are : R&D personal working into the unit without being paid directly by the unit (temporary workers, consultancy activities, doctoral/master's students). Volunteers are not included (FM §5.24).
Clinical trials  Clinical trials are mainly carried out in university hospitals and cancer research centers. 
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from rest of the world by sector - availability  The following categories are distinguished in the survey:

- receipts from EU
- from international organisations
- from foreign higher education and other foreign state bodies
- from foreign enterprises

The following categories are available as data disseminated : 

- foreign national organisations
- foreign higher education and other foreign state bodies plus foreign enterprises

Payments to rest of the world by sector - availability

Payments to rest of the world are GERD executed abroad.  The following categories are distinguished in the survey:

- to international organisations
- to foreign higher education and other foreign state bodies
- to foreign enterprises

The following categories are available as data disseminated : 

- to foreign national organisations
- to foreign higher education and other foreign state bodies plus foreign enterprises

3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  Yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure We consider subcontracting and collaboration in R&D tasks to be external R&D expenditure. These are non-taxable expenses relating to complete or partial R&D programs carried out by a third party on behalf of an establishment, excluding orders for supplies or simple services linked to R&D work carried out by this establishment and included in domestic expenses.
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  No difficulties. 
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar year.
Source of funds The sources of funds by R&D branch are collected on the basis of total expenditure (intramural + extramural R&D expenditure). Compliant with
Type of R&D  No 
Type of costs  Labour costs, other current costs (icld costs for external R&D personnel), capital expenditures (breakdown by lands and buildings, instruments and equipments).
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  Extramural expenditures are collected only for non-defence sector. No specific information is collected for GERD.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years   31st December of the reference year
Function  The R&D personnel is classified by occupation. The researchers category corresponds to the specialists who work with the design or the creation of knowledge, products, processes, methods and new systems. Also included are executives and administrators who plan and manage the researchers work. The technicians category includes engineers whose work is not regarded as R&D per se as well as the other persons performing technical tasks linked with R&D projects. The support personnel consists of workers, qualified or not, and office personnel helping with R&D projects or who are directly associated with the implementation of such projects. 
Qualification  Researchers data are broken down by seniority. Doctoral student are collected.
Age  Less than 25, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, 50-54, 55-59, 60-64, more than 65.
Citizenship  Not available
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years   Calendar year.
Function  The R&D personnel is classified by occupation. The researchers category corresponds to the specialists who work with the design or the creation of knowledge, products, processes, methods and new systems. Also included are executives and administrators who plan and manage the researchers work. The technicians category includes engineers whose work is not regarded as R&D per se as well as the other persons performing technical tasks linked with R&D projects. The support personnel consists of workers, qualified or not, and office personnel helping with R&D projects or who are directly associated with the implementation of such projects.
Qualification   Researchers data are broken down by seniority. Doctoral student are collected.
Age  Not available.
Citizenship  Not available.
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

Full-time equivalents consist of average figures for the year that take account of departures and arrivals during the year and also of the time devoted to research in cases where the activity does not consist solely of R&D.

 

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 not available    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit is the institutional unit as defined by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1993/696 of 15 March 1993.

Compliant with  and the SNA.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population of institutional units.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the Government Sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  The target population is composed of all state-owned companies of commercial and industrial nature, public institutions with a scientific and technical vocation, public administrative institutions located in France (including overseas departments and territories) who perform R&D activity.   
Estimation of the target population size  41  
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

In ESS countries, the frame population for GOV R&D statistics is defined as the list of all the institutional units classified by the national accounts (ESA) as included in the General government (S.13), with the exclusion of those units included in the Higher education sector (HES).

 

Method used to define the frame population Units must perform intramural R&D and have a governmental status.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer   Units already included in the census survey which declare intramural R&D, plus public establishments which get research tax credit, units can be added also because they are mentioned in some answers (extramural or financed R&D part) or because they are in administrative sources on R&D (ScanR).
Inclusion of units that primarily do not belong to the frame population The GOV questionnaire is addressed to 3 big PNP units (Pasteur, Curie, INRS) BUT these 3 units are not included in the GOV sector (they are included in the PNP sector, with all other smaller PNP units, which receive a lighter questionnaire).
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  No.
Estimation of the frame population  44
3.7. Reference area

France, including overseas departments and territories.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 3.4.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. The base year for the unit Purchasing Power Standard (PPS) and PPS per inhabitant at constant prices is currently 2005. All calculations of non-basic unit (national currencies) are done by Eurostat.


4. Unit of measure Top

R&D expenditures are given in Keuros (1.000 euros).
R&D personnel is given in headcounts and in full-time equivalent (FTE).


5. Reference Period Top

2021


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation
Legal acts / agreements Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology was in force until the end of 2020. 
Nature of the “obligations” of responsible national organisations to produce statistics and report to international organisations  Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics and repealing Regulation https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02009R0223-20150608
6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  Yes
Legal acts  
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  Yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)   bospe-mesri-2-1424603-pdf-16940.pdf (enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr) Go to page 17 and  18. 
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  - Law no. 51-711 of June 7, 1951 on the obligation, coordination and secrecy of statistics. Article 6 - Loi n° 51-711 du 7 juin 1951 sur l'obligation, la coordination et le secret en matière de statistiques. - Légifrance (legifrance.gouv.fr)

- Article 26 of the law no. 83-634 of July 13, 1983 on the rights and obligations of civil servants. Also known as the Le Pors Act. Loi n° 83-634 du 13 juillet 1983 portant droits et obligations des fonctionnaires. Loi dite loi Le Pors. - Légifrance (legifrance.gouv.fr)

 - Chapter 6 of the 1st part of the law no. 78-17 of January 6, 1978 on data processing, data files and individual liberties. For Collection, recording and storage of personal information.

Loi n° 78-17 du 6 janvier 1978 relative à l'informatique, aux fichiers et aux libertés - Légifrance (legifrance.gouv.fr)

Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)   The Law no. 78-753 of July 17 introduced a citizen's right of access to administrative documents. This means that anyone can obtain access to documents held by an administration in the course of its public service mission, whatever their form or medium.
Planned changes of legislation  No, as far as we know 
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

- European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

Data from public government agencies / bodies can be published individually. 

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

Every individual staff member is obliged by internal rules and by the European Statistics Code of Practice to a strict confidential treatment of information.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Data on government agencies or bodies are not subject to statistical confidentiality.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

June N+2 for Eurostat dissemination

Summer N+2 for national dissemination

Final results : September N+2 and December N+2

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/calendrier-2023-des-publications-statistiques-du-sies-46592

8.3. Release policy - user access

Official calendar

Publications

Press releases

Users are treated according to the national statistical system rules, i.e. all users have access to the information at the same time.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

yearly


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases N Not concerned
Ad-hoc releases press release on the ministry website when the publication is disseminated

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/la-depense-de-recherche-et-developpement-experimental-en-2021-92628

https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/eesr/16/FR/

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/depenses-de-recherche-et-developpement-experimental-en-france-resultats-detailles-pour-2021-et-94089

Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N
 Not concerned. 

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Not available.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/statistiques-et-analyses-50213

Access cost policy The access is free
Micro-data anonymisation rules Data from a short list of government agencies or bodies are published individually. The rest is published as an aggregate only.
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y Data from a short list of government agencies or bodies are published individually. The rest is published as an aggregate only. Ministry website : 

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/statistiques-et-analyses-50213

Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y Data from a short list of government agencies or bodies are published individually. The rest is published as an aggregate only. Specific requests from some government department (inspections, Cour des comptes), researchers and Insee
Other  N  Not concerned  Not concerned

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

We don't have an official methodology file, but everyone in charge of the survey must write a file describing everything they've done, such as the survey objective, the population, the way they conducted the survey, the statistical process. We publish the notice that explain the concepts used in the survey. 

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Explanatory notes linked to the questionnaire.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues Sometimes the respondents ask for more information on where to put some specific data.
Measure to increase clarity No
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  This information is not available as we don't  specifically ask feedback. As we have never received complains or clarifications requests on the results published, we can say it is overall good. 


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The exhaustivity of surveyed establishement is checked using the national directory of research structures (https://appliweb.dgri.education.fr/rnsr/) and registry of national research tax credit. The staff in charge of the survey are qualified statisticians and the plateform where the data are collected have many error or incoherences checks and warn the respondent if need be. If needed a time extension and personnal assistance are given to the respondents. 

11.2. Quality management - assessment

We surveyed 44 establishments in 2021. The response rate is increased by follow-up calls and e-mails. We also check the consistency of the responses received and call back the respondent if something  seems unaccurate or not clear.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  Eurostat STI regulation  National aggregates and metadata
 1  OCDE - MSTI  National aggregates
 1  MESR  National aggregates
 3  Medias  Disseminated data
 6 Cour des comptes (Chamber of Accounts), inspections générales de l'administration, des finances ou de l'éducation nationale Specific questions
 4 Researchers or students Specific questions

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
• European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
• International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  We don't do that 
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  We don't do that 
Short description of the feedback received  Not available
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

not available

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

 

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells

Preliminary variables  X          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure  X          
Optional data on R&D expenditure    X        
Obligatory data on R&D personnel  X          
Optional data on R&D personnel    X        
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel  X          

Criteria:

A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y-1992  Yearly We have no missing data. We have global figures from 1992, more detailed open data from 2002 to 2013, and figures accessible on our website from 2015.  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Type of R&D  Y-1992  Yearly We have no missing data. We have global figures from 1992, more detailed open data from 2002 to 2013, and figures accessible on our website from 2015.  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Type of costs  Y-1992  Yearly We have no missing data. We have global figures from 1992, more detailed open data from 2002 to 2013, and figures accessible on our website from 2015.  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Socioeconomic objective  No  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
Region  Y-1992  Yearly We have no missing data. We have global figures from 1992, more detailed open data from 2002 to 2013.  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
FORD  Y-1992  Yearly We have no missing data. We have global figures from 1992, more detailed open data from 2002 to 2013, and figures accessible on our website from 2015.  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Type of institution  Y-1992  Yearly We have no missing data. We have global figures from 1992, more detailed open data from 2002 to 2013, and figures accessible on our website from 2015.  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1992  Yearly  No gap year  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Function  Y-1992  Yearly  No gap year  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Qualification  N  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
Age  Y-1992  Yearly  No gap year  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Citizenship  N  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
Region  N  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
FORD  Y-1992  Yearly  No gap year  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Type of institution  N
 Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex 1992-2020  Yearly  No gap year  Data collection was stopped   2021 To decrease the response burden
Function Y-1992  Yearly  No gap year  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
Qualification N  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
Age N  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
Citizenship  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
Region Y-1992  Yearly
 No gap year  No modifications  No modifications  No modifications
FORD N  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned
Type of institution N  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned  Not concerned

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown variables Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
  Extra-mural R&D expenditure  Y-1992  Yearly By R&D performer sector (government, enterprises, higher education facilities, foreign institution)  Breakdown by sector (enterprises, foreign, association, HES, Government) the expenditures were used in.   Statistical unit

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  -  3  1  2  4  -  +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE  -  3  1  2  4  -  +/-
Researchers in FTE  -  3  1  2  4  -  +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure  X        
Total R&D personnel in FTE  X        
Researchers in FTE  X         

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria described above would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV). 
Definition of coefficient of variation: 
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Doesn't apply because we conduct a census survey.

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise  Not concerned
Government  Not concerned
Higher education  Not concerned
Private non-profit  Not concerned
Rest of the world  Not concerned
Total  Not concerned
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Function Researchers  Not concerned
Technicians  Not concerned
other support staff  Not concerned
Qualification ISCED 8  Not concerned
ISCED 5-7  Not concerned
ISCED 4 and below  Not concerned
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors :

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

 

c)       Share of PNP (if PNP is included in GOV):

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not requested.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Controls on unit used by the respondent and by SIES . Control of the consistency with the rest of the recorded information. Use of annual reports and GBARD results.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 There are micro and macro controls on the survey platform and we also proposed to the respondents to call or send us a mail if they have questions. 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
36  41  12 %
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
 R&D Personnel (both FTE and PP)  Low  No comments
 R&D Expenditure (GOVERD)  Less than 1 %  No comments
 R&D GOV Sources of funding (to cover research expenditure of the sector)  Low  No comments
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

We do follow-up by email and phone calls and possible deadline extension. 

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  An online questionnaire
Estimates of data entry errors  0% of non valid values. We don't have a measurement of percentage of errors recorded. 
Variables for which coding was performed  No coding was performed
Estimates of coding errors  No coding was performed
Editing process and method During the data collection and cleaning, if there is an error (wrong unit for example), the person in charge of the survey can correct the wrong value directly on the online questionnaire of the respondent. 
Procedure used to correct errors  Imputation, re-contact the respondents for clarifications if we detect errors or inconsistencies. 
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period:

b) Date of first release of national data:

c) Lag (days):

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31 December, 2021

b) Date of first release of national data: July 2023

c) Lag (days): Roughly 19 months

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  We don't transmit provisional data, only final.  19
Delay (days)   Not concerned  30
Reasoning for delay  Not concerned  For reasons of programming the automation of SDMX file production


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

The National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) is included in the higher education sector, although in some countries, such as Italy, this type of organisation is classified in the government sector; this affects the distribution of R&D effort by sector of performance. The National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) is included in the GOV survey and treated alongside the other government units.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197, Frascati manual and EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2). N Not concerned
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39. Not concerned 
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with  Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).
Not concerned 
Approach to obtaining FTE data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). Not concerned 
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25 Not concerned 
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2). Not concerned 
Statistical unit FM2015, § 8.64-8.65 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). Not concerned 
Target population FM2015, § 8.63 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). Not concerned 
Sector coverage FM2015, § 8.2-8.13 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). Not concerned 
Hospitals and clinics FM2015, § 8.22 and 8.34 Not concerned 
Borderline research institutions FM2015, § 8.14-8.23 (in combination with Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics). Not concerned 
Fields of research & development coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18 Not concerned 
Socioeconomic objectives coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18 Not concerned Not concerned 
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197 : Annex 1, Table 18 Not concerned 

 

15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method N Census
Survey questionnaire / data collection form Online questionnaire and the responses are hosted in a database.
Cooperation with respondents They can call us if they have questions or problem. We do a follow-up to remind them the deadline and call the back if there is something wrong or not clear witg their answers.
Data processing methods After data collection and follow-up to correct some errors, we clean the data and do imputation for the non respondents (see the following row for more details). 
Treatment of non-response We impute the value of the previous survey, if not available, for each non-respondent, we use auxiliary information in annual reports, and if it is not possible we affect a group of units who it looks the most like based on the information we have and we affect the mean of the group answer to the non-respondent missing values. 
Variance estimation Not concerned because we run a census survey No comments
Data compilation of final and preliminary data Not concerned, we only have final data No comments
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)  From 1978   2001, 1998, 1997, 1992   2001:The data communicated by the Ministry of Defense now cover research that was not considered as R&D in earlier years.
1998 and 1997:A reduction of 11948 FTE in the government and higher education sectors. In the light of the new data supplied by the Ministry of Defence, the figure for personnel has been revised from 19544 (a figure which had not been revised for twenty years) to 4063, a difference of 15481 FTE. The other corrections that were made lessened the impact of this revision of defence personnel data.
1992:The data related to the business enterprise and government sectors are not comparable with the corresponding data for 1991 due to the transfer of agencies (France Télécom and GIAT Industries) from the government sector to the business enterprise sector, in accordance with the change in their legal status.
  Function  From 1978    
  Qualification  Not concerned    
R&D personnel (FTE)  From 1978  2001, 1998, 1997, 1992  2001:The data communicated by the Ministry of Defense now cover research that was not considered as R&D in earlier years.
1998 and 1997:A reduction of 11948 FTE in the government and higher education sectors. In the light of the new data supplied by the Ministry of Defence, the figure for personnel has been revised from 19544 (a figure which had not been revised for twenty years) to 4063, a difference of 15481 FTE. The other corrections that were made lessened the impact of this revision of defence personnel data.
1992:The data related to the business enterprise and government sectors are not comparable with the corresponding data for 1991 due to the transfer of agencies (France Télécom and GIAT Industries) from the government sector to the business enterprise sector, in accordance with the change in their legal status.
  Function  From 1978    
  Qualification  Not concerned    
R&D expenditure  From 1978   2001, 1997, 1992, 1981, 2010 

 2001:Coverage of the BE sector was expanded, and the data communicated by the Ministry of Defense now cover research that was not considered as R&D in earlier years.
1997: Modifications to the boundary between R&D and other activities conducted by some very large enterprises resulted in a FRF 2.6 billion adjustment to domestic expenditure by business enterprises. BERD increased to FRF 113854 million from 111278 before revision. The new estimates for 1998 also resulted in 1997 corrections to R&D personnel with an increase of 2257 FTE in the business enterprise sector
1992:The data related to the business enterprise and government sectors are not comparable with the corresponding data for 1991 due to the transfer of agencies (France Télécom and GIAT Industries) from the government sector to the business enterprise sector, in accordance with the change in their legal status.- account has been taken of the repayment of reimbursable aid in the distribution of R&D expenditure by source of funding in the data supplied to the OECD. - the method used for the survey of the private non-profit sector has been modified
1981:The evaluation of R&D expenditure was modified to take account of: - a reassessment of the proportion of time devoted to research by lecturers. The Ministry of Education currently estimates this share to amount to 50% on average, whereas the coefficients previously supplied by the Ministry and applied until 1980 (natural sciences 65%, medicine 30% and social sciences 10%) amounted on average to approximately 35%; - the cost of research and development work by the Ministry of Defence in connection with the FOST (Strategic Ocean Force), which previously was not included under R&D; - the impact of levying VAT on public research bodies.

In 2010, the methode to compute the GOVERD was changed in order to separate the financing activity from the GOVERD. This led to a shift of minus 1 billion € for GOVERD.

Source of funds  From 1978   1992  Account has been taken of the repayment of reimbursable aid in the distribution of R&D expenditure by source of funding. 
Type of costs  From 1978    
Type of R&D  From 1978    
Other  No    

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Data are collected every year.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Survey results are the input for national accounts, there is no other source for R&D.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
There are no other statistics for which data from GOV can be compared with because we are the only ones conducting the R&D in GOV survey.  Not concerned   Not concerned   Not concerned   Not concerned   Not concerned 
15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – GOVERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  -  -  -
Final data (delivered T+18)      
Difference (of final data) Not relevant, we disseminate only final data.  Not relevant, we disseminate only final data. Not relevant, we disseminate only final data.
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  -
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  We are unable to provide this information because we don't have other current costs for external R&D personnel

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs   Not available   Not available
Data collection costs   Not available   Not available
Other costs   Not available   Not available
Total costs   Not available   Not available
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  36 Sum of all R&D-performing government institutions that responded entirely to the survey.
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  14 Mean of the time spent reported by the respondents.
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)   Not available  Not available
Total cost   Not available  Not available

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  Survey on resources devoted to R&D in public administrations and agencies
Type of survey  Census among all known R&D performing units in public administrations and agencies
Combination of sample survey and census data  Not concerned
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  Not concerned
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  Not concerned
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  Not concerned
Variables the survey contributes to  All the variables requested by the European regulation
Survey timetable-most recent implementation Starting date: 30 October, 2023

First reminder: 18 December, 2023

Second reminder (by phone): 2 February, 2024

Estimated ending date: April 30, 2024

18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit No sample  Not concerned  Not concerned
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only) - - -
Stratification variable classes
Population size 41 
Planned sample size -
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)
Survey frame We have our own register and we update it every year with "Paysage",  an online platform that has information on most of the public administrations and agencies performing research in France. We complete it with the research tax credit register and an Insee survey (CIS).
Sample design Census
Sample size 41
Survey frame quality Good
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  DgFip ; Insee
Description of collected data / statistics  Individual data on the Research Tax Credit ; Extract from Insee Firms Register SIRUS, CIS survey ==> both in order to select the units in the survey
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  2019 - 2021 for RTC ; 2021 for SIRUS file
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider Individual staff members of the units. Usually the finance directors, research managers, HR department.  
Description of collected information We collect information on the nature and use of  intramural and extramural R&D expenditures, the regions where they are used, the resources and their origins. We also collect information on the R&D staff and the administrative personnel who support the R&D (HC and FTE). For the personnal, we collect information on their age, gender, their function, the type of contract they are on, who pay them, their work place. 
Data collection method All the units receive an email to inform them about the survey, the deadlines and the link to the online questionnaire with their identifiers. We have access to their questionnaire whether it is completed or not. That means, we can use partially completed questionnaires.
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients Not asked. We ask for FTE.
Realised sample size (per stratum) No sample, it is census.
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.) Online survey. The units have access to the questionnaire and just have to fill it. 
Incentives used for increasing response Follow-up and calls and explanation of the use of the data collected and as a last ressort, a letter of the sub-director for Information Systems and Statistical Studies
Follow-up of non-respondents By email,  by phone call for the most influent ones. 
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed) Not concerned
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  88 % in units but 99 % in GOVERD
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5.4 Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods) We do imputation for the non-respondents based on their previous year answer and/or auxiliary information in annual reports and/or the units they look the most like. 
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  N
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language: https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/enquete-rd-aupres-des-administrations-81709
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  N
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  N
18.4. Data validation

Emails and phone follow-up to increase the response rate, consistency checks with the last survey answers and overall consistcency of the answers (personnel expenditure and FTE for example).

Use of the GBARD survey and annual reports to complete the consistency checks.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

The total imputation is less than 1%, the partial imputation is low.

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  We run our survey every year, so we are not concerned. 
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  We run our survey every year, so we are not concerned. 
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  We collect information (expenditures and personnal FTE) on the regions where the R&D is performed by the units. 
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  Some units mention such coefficients but the amount of R&D is directly asked for in the survey.
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures   Depreciation and VAT are excluded from R&D expenditure.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  No deviation. 
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method  No weight, it is census.
Description of the estimation method For the non responses, we do imputation first by imputating the n-1 response if non-missing and if we don't have the n-1 response we preferably use auxiliary information in annual reports. To estimate a partial missing value we either use the n-1 response or calculate the mean of a group of units to which the non-respondent is most similar for the variable of interest.
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top