Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistisches Bundesamt


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistisches Bundesamt

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Unit H24 - Research, Culture

1.5. Contact mail address

Martin Szibalski

Gustav-Stresemann-Ring 11

D-65180 Wiesbaden

Germany


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 31/10/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 31/10/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 31/10/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Government R&D (GOVERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the Government sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Government sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector.

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics.

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

3.2. Classification system
  • The local units for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics;
  • The distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) is based on Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS);
  • The fields of research and development are based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
 no  
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D Research and experimental development (R & D) comprise creative and systematic work undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge – including knowledge of humankind, culture and society – and to devise new applications of available knowledge.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)

"natural sciences", "engineering and technology", "medical sciences", "agricultural sciences", "social sciences" and "humanities" data are separately available.

"Sports science" is included in "humanities" and "pharmacy" is included in "natural sciences".

Until 2014: Humanities generally include educational sciences, linguistics, psychology.

Since 2014: Engineering and technology generally include computer information science.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO)  For the Government sector, every forth year a detailed breakdown ist asked
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Government sector  Research institutes of federal, Länder (federal states) and local governments, the national research centres, the Max-Planck and the Fraunhofer societies, institutions of the Leibniz association, scientific museums and libraries, private non profit organisations working in science, research and development as long as they receive more than EUR 160,000 from the government in the reporting year. The coverage is not fully in accordance with the national accounts, we question some institutions which are classified in BES by the national accounts, science they are mainly funded by government. We refer to FM Chapter 3.20, thus, funding may also be a factor for classification.
Hospitals and clinics  University hospitals are included in the HE sector. 
Inclusion of units that primary don`t belong to GOV The target population are research institutes of federal, Länder (federal states) and local
governments, the national research centres, the Max-Planck and the Fraunhofer societies,
institutions of the Leibniz association, scientific museums and libraries, private non profit
organisations working in science, research and development as long as they receive more than
EUR 160,000 from the government in the reporting year. Some institutes carrying out R&D to a
minor degree could be missing because R&D not their main task.
So the target population includes
a) government units (federal, regional, state level)
b) Non-market non-profit institutions controlled by goverment
c) The PNP-sector
d) Some institutions which are allocated to BES or PNP according SNA, but which are are mainly
financed and controlled by government (Max-Planck, Fraunhofer, Leibniz Association)
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
not includedR&D administration and other support activities  Persons working in R&D organisation (administration, etc.) are included. 
External R&D personnel  not included
Clinical trials  
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from Rest of the world by sector - availability yes
Payments to Rest of the world by sector - availability no 
R&D expenditure of foreign affiliates - coverage  
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  yes
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  in questionnaire forwarded assignments and grants are shown separately
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  Calendar year 
Source of funds  For the Government sector, every fourth year a detailed breakdown is asked and applied together with a rough breakdown which is reported every year in the meantime. 
Type of R&D

Since 2006 every fourth year a detailed breakdown is asked in the survey.

No breakdown available from 1994 to 2006.

Up to 1993 basic research was separately reported. Applied research and experimental development were aggregated. Basic research data were provided from the surveys of the Federal Ministry for Education, Science, Research and Technology. Expenditure of the Max-Planck Institutes was totally credited to basic research

Type of costs  A detailed breakdown is asked annually
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  fixed date
Function Researcher = persons with university qualification (ISCED 5A, 6) (including universities of applied sciences);

Technicans = persons with other tertiary education (ISCED 5B) and holders of diplomas of secondary education (except workers);
Others= all other persons working in R&D organisations

Since 2014 detailed categories of personnel are asked and allocated to the occupations, except personnel of federal institutions and institutions of the Länder (see definition above).
Qualification  ISCED 8, ISCED 7, ISCED 6, ISCED 5 are asked separately,

Qualification ISCED 4 and below is reported together

Age  year of birth
Citizenship  yes
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  Fixed date
Function  Researcher = persons with university qualification (ISCED 5A, 6) (including universities of applied sciences);

Technicans = persons with other tertiary education (ISCED 5B) and holders of diplomas of secondary education (except workers);
Others= all other persons working in R&D organisations

Since 2014 detailed categories of personnel are asked and allocated to the occupations, except personnel of federal institutions and institutions of the Länder (see definition above).
Qualification  ISCED 8, ISCED 7, ISCED 6, ISCED 5 are asked separately,
Qualification ISCED 4 and below is reported together
Age  year of birth
Citizenship  yes
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

FTE is calculated by taking 100% of personnel working full-time in R&D organisations and 50% of personnel working part-time in R&D organisations. 

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 not available    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical units are those included the in the National Accounts plus PNP sector and some profit institutions which are financed by the government for the most part 

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective, the target population for the national R&D survey of the Government Sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including known R&D performers or assumed to perform R&D). In practise however, countries in their R&D surveys might have difficulty in identifying R&D activities at the municipality level. 

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population

The target population are research institutes of federal, Länder (federal states) and local governments, the national research centres, the Max-Planck and the Fraunhofer societies, institutions of the Leibniz association, scientific museums and libraries, private non profit organisations working in science, research and development as long as they receive more than EUR 160,000 from the government in the reporting year. Some institutes carrying out R&D to a minor degree could be missing because R&D not their main task.

So the target population includes

a) government units (federal, regional, state level)

b) Non-market non-profit institutions controlled by goverment

c) The PNP-sector

d) Some institutions which are allocated to BES or PNP according SNA, but which are are mainly

financed and controlled by government (Max-Planck, Fraunhofer, Leibniz Association)

 
Estimation of the target population size  Approx. 1000  
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

In ESS countries, the frame population for GOV R&D statistics is defined as the list of all the institutional units classified by the national accounts (ESA) as included in the General government (S.13), with the exclusion of those units included in the Higher education sector (HES).

 

Method used to define the frame population The frame population covers the PNP-sector and some profit institutions if they are financed by the government for the most part.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer Information on the R&D activities is taken from the databases on public funding and beneficiaries from the research ministries of federal and Länder level.
Some institutes are checked by online research about their activities.
Inclusion of units that primary don`t belong to the frame population  Since 1991, the Government sector includes private non-profit institutes, which are not permanently financed by business enterprises, as far as data are available from the annual survey in the government
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  
Estimation of the frame population Information not available, because there is no official register. We assume, that we cover the target population almost fully with our method to define the target population.
3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

expenditures: Euro ( thousand)

personnel: HC


5. Reference Period Top

expenditures: a calendar year

personnel: point in time (30. June)


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

Legal acts / agreements

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  yes
Legal acts Gesetz über die Statistiken der öffentlichen Finanzen und des Personals im öffentlichen Dienst in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 22. Februar 2006 (BGBl. I S. 438), zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 3. Juni 2021 (BGBl. I S. 1401) geändert
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  yes
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  no
Planned changes of legislation  no
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law: Federal Statistics Act (BStatG)

 b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff: Is ensured by oath of office

 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Confidential data/cells are delivered to Eurostat with the relevant remark.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Date of final release of provisional national data: T+10 month

Date of final release of final national data: T+14 month

8.2. Release calendar access

no official release calendar available

8.3. Release policy - user access

Publications/data releases are usually accompanied by a press release (accessible to the public).


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

yearly


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y

Regular press release in first quarter every year.

Link for press release:

https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Forschung-Entwicklung/_inhalt.html

Ad-hoc releases  N  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Mean of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y Printed annual series on request (online publication).
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Destatis database "GENESIS Online": https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online

Database of the Ministry for education and research: "Datenportal BMBF" - Link: http://www.datenportal.bmbf.de/portal/de/K1.html

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  GOV/PNP/HES: no microdata access
Access cost policy  No costs
Micro-data anonymisation rules  No dissemination of micro data
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means  Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
 

Internet: main resultsavailable on the nationalstatistical authority’s website

Y   Some key breakdowns available, detailed online publication available for download
 Data prepared forindividual ad hoc requests Y   with rules of confidentiality for detailed breakdowns
 Other   Data prepared for regular publications of other authorities, for example state statistical offices and federal and state ministries for education and research

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

National quality report: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Forschung-Entwicklung/_inhalt.html#sprg410790

 

 

 

 

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.) 

Quality Report: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Forschung-Entwicklung/_inhalt.html#sprg410790

Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  ain feedback of users consists in asking for additional breakdowns or combination of variables. As far as possible the requested data are produced.
Measure to increase clarity  no
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   good


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Broad Quality Management within the Statistical Offices of Germany and the federal states (Länder.)

Rules are described for example in: "Qualitätshandbuch der Statistischen Ämter des Bundes und der Länder": https://stanet-web.stba.testa-de.net/DE/Statistikuebergreifend/Qualitaetsmanagement/Qualitaetshandbuch.pdf

Within the Statistical Office: Quality Reports for each statistic, for example R&D: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Bildung-Forschung-Kultur/Forschung-Entwicklung/_inhalt.html#sprg410790

Regular review of the implementation of quality guidelines (Qualitätsrichtlinien (QRL))

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The overall assessment of the GOV R&D methodology is good especially because of the mandatory character. Some weakness appears while not asking for R&D expenditure and personnel but instead working with R&D coefficients.

Sometimes the identification of a research institute causes some problems as there is no register which can be used.

Because of the mandatory character there is a very high response rate. The respondents receive several reminders within the survey period.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
1  Eurostat; European Commission  Data tabulation and publication, building EU aggregates; research policy assessment
 Ministries of Education and Research  Research policy making and assessment, analysis and publications
 OECD, UNESCO  Data tabulation, analysis and publication
 Mainly economists  Analysis, policy assessment
3  Specialized media and media for the general public Reporting on research and policy issues
5 Consulting agencies that do marketing for special locations for businesses Market analysis
6  -  -

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, Other Ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No user satisfaction survey has been conducted.
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  not applicable
Short description of the feedback received  Possibility to comment on questionnaire. Some feedback we receive concerns the confidentiality when many detailed breakdowns are requested.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

As it is a mandatory data collection the completeness is nearly 100%

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation (EU) stipulates periodicity of variables that should be provided, breakdowns and if they should be provided mandatory or on voluntary basis.

 

5
(Very Good)

4
(Good)
3
(Satisfactory)
2
(Poor)
1
(Very poor)
Reasons formissing cells
Preliminary variables x          
Obligatory data on R&D expenditure x          
Optional data on R&D expenditure     x     no legal basis for collecting special indicators
Obligatory data on R&D personnel x          
Optional data on R&D personnel     x     no legal basis for collecting special indicators
Regional data on R&D expenditure and R&D personnel x          

Criteria:
A) Obligatory data. Only 'Very Good' = 100%, Poor' >95%; 'Very Poor' <100% apply.
B) Optional data. 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%; 'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y-1981       Geographical coverage   1991  From 1991, the data are for unified Germany. Until 1990, data in the STI/EAS databases cover West Germany only 
Type of R&D Y-1981    Every fourth year     Geographical coverage   1991  From 1991, the data are for unified Germany. Until 1990, data in the STI/EAS databases cover West Germany only 
Type of costs Y-1981        Geographical coverage   1991 From 1991, the data are for unified Germany. Until 1990, data in the STI/EAS databases cover West Germany only  
Socioeconomic objective Y-1996   Every fourth year         
Region  Y-1981       Geographical coverage   1991 From 1991, the data are for unified Germany. Until 1990, data in the STI/EAS databases cover West Germany only  
FORD  Y-1993    

 Geographical coverage 

Changes in national classification

 1991

2005

 From 1991, the data are for unified Germany. Until 1990, data in the STI/EAS databases cover West Germany only. 

Adaption to Higher Education sector

Type of institution  Y-1981       Geographical coverage   1991  From 1991, the data are for unified Germany. Until 1990, data in the STI/EAS databases cover West Germany only 

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1995          
Function  Y-1995     Detailed categories of personnel are asked and allocated to the occupations, except personnel of federal institutions and institutions of the Länder  2014  Change of national statistical legislation 
Qualification N          
Age          
Citizenship          
Region Y-1995           
FORD Y-1995       Changes in national classification   2015  Adaption to Higher Education sector 
Type of institution  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex Y-1995            
Function Y-1995       Detailled categories of personnel are asked and allocated to the occupations, except personnel of federal institutions and institutions of the Länder.  2014  
Qualification Y-1995            
Age Y-1995            
Citizenship Y-1995            
Region  Y-1995           
FORD  Y-1995       changes in national classification  2015  Adaption to Higher Education sector 
Type of institution  Y-1995           

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
 Researchers/university graduates - Sex   Y-1995        
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 (neither as 'optional').

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure - 2  1 4  -  +/-
Total R&D personnel in FTE -  1  -  +/-
Researchers in FTE -  1  -  +/-

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure 5        
Total R&D personnel in FTE        
Researchers in FTE        

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys. Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV). 
Definition of coefficient of variation: 
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

no sample

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by source of funds
Source of funds R&D expenditure
Business enterprise n.a
Government n.a 
Higher education n.a 
Private non-profit n.a 
Rest of the world n.a 
Total n.a 
13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for R&D expenditure by function and qualification
    R&D personnel (FTE)
Occupation Researchers n.a
Technicians n.a 
Other support staff n.a 
Qualification ISCED 8  n.a
ISCED 5-7  n.a
ISCED 4 and below  n.a
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors :

Since there is no official register, there might be signle institutions which are no included.

Data of government-funded institutions, which receive less than 160.000 Euros in the reported year, is not questioned and therefore not included.

The omitted amount can not be numbered but is expected to be small.

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Yearly assessment.

Information on the R&D activities is taken from the databases on public funding and beneficiaries from the research ministries of federal and Länder level.

Some institutes are checked by online research about their activities.

 

c)       Share of PNP (if PNP is included in GOV): approx. 15% 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not requested.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Measurement errors can occur while using R&D coefficients and by assuming the regional allocation of R&D personnel also for R&D expenditure. The measurement error caused by institutional coverage is small.

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

The R&D coefficients are checked with information from other sources (ministries, publications etc.). The coverage is permanently improved by using different sources of information about new or existing research institutes. The questionnaire and the validity checks are improved continuously.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

-Unit non-response which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

-Item non-response which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates. 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfactory by computing the un-weighted response rate.

Definition: Eligible are the survey units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with certain units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’.

Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted unit non-response rate
Number of units with a response in the survey Total number of units in the survey Unit non-response rate (Un-weighted)
 1038  1054  0.0152
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item Non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
R&D variable/breakdown Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%) Comments
 No information available  No information available  No information available
     
     
13.3.3.3. Measures to increase response rate

Mandatory survey: when no response -> regulatory offence procedure; reminders

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  Automatic checks for plausibility and consistency during data collection. In addition: Possible errors are checked by comparing the results with previous answers and by calling back the respondents. 
Estimates of data entry errors Data from institutions are rejected if not correct. Contact and questions to the institution until correct data is provided.
Variables for which coding was performed See above. 
Estimates of coding errors See above. 
Editing process and method See above. 
Procedure used to correct errors  Re-contact with information provider or imputation on the basis of data of the previous year. There is also the possibility to impute with data of annual reports. This is done very rarely.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: submission to Eurostat: 13.10.2022

c) Lag (days): 286

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 08.03.2022

c) Lag (days): 432

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  10  18
Delay (days)   0  0
Reasoning for delay  -  -


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

As from 1993, R&D expenditure in the government sector, and consequently total GERD, includes R&D performed in German research institutions located abroad. This amounts to between 0.6 and 0.7% of R&D expenditure in the government sector and less than 0.1% of GERD.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 or Frascati manual paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2). YES  Applying R&D coefficients to derive R&D personnel only internal personnel
Researcher FM2015, § 5.35-5.39. NO  
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, § 5.58-5.61 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). NO   
Approach to obtaining FTE data FM2015, § 5.49-5.57 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). NO   
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25 YES  Only data for internal personnel available.
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015, Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2). NO  
Statistical unit FM2015, § 8.64-8.65 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). NO   
Target population FM2015, § 8.63 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). YES  Some institutes carrying out R&D to a minor degree are missing because R&D not their main task.
Sector coverage FM2015, § 8.2-8.13 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). YES Some institutes carrying out R&D to a minor degree are missing because R&D is not their main task. Some institutions mainly funded by government are classified as GOV, not by sectors of the national accounts. This is in line with the FM2015 (§ 3.20, 3.37, 8.14, 8.15)
Hospitals and clinics FM2015, § 8.22 and 8.34 NO   
Borderline research institutions FM2015, § 8.14-8.23 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). NO   
Fields of research & development coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.3.  YES Engineering and technology generally includes computer and information science. Sports science is included in humanities, pharmacy is included in natural sciences.
Socioeconomic objectives coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.8. YES   Data available every fourth year.
Reference period Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 4-6. NO   
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection method NO  Annual census survey
Survey questionnaire / data collection form NO   
Cooperation with respondents NO   
Data processing methods NO   
Treatment of non-response NO  
Variance estimation NOT APPLICABLE   
Data compilation of final and preliminary data NO  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See 12.3.3. and 15.2.2

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)    1992, 1991, 1985, 1983, 1981   

1992:-the restructuring that took place after unification created over 100 non-university research units in the government sector;


-the methodology of the surveys on resources devoted to R&D in the government sector was altered. 
  Function    2014  Since 2014 detailed categories of personnel are asked and allocated to the occupations, except personnel of federal institutions and institutions of the Länder
  Qualification      
R&D personnel (FTE)    1992, 1991, 1985, 1983, 1981   

1992:-the restructuring that took place after unification created over 100 non-university research units in the government sector;


-the methodology of the surveys on resources devoted to R&D in the government sector was altered. 
  Function    2014  Since 2014 detailed categories of personnel are asked and allocated to the occupations, except personnel of federal institutions and institutions of the Länder
  Qualification      
R&D expenditure    1992, 1991, 1985, 1983, 1981   1992:-the restructuring that took place after unification created over 100 non-university research units in the government sector;
-the methodology of the surveys on resources devoted to R&D in the government sector was altered. 
Source of funds    1981, 1983  1983 and 1981: downwards adjustment of R&D performed by the government sector and of government funding to higher education. 
Type of costs      
Type of R&D      
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Enhanced and detailed categories for personnel, especially regarding researchers.


The coverage is not fully in accordance with the national accounts, we question some institutions which are classified in BES by the national accounts, science they are mainly funded by government. We referto FM Chapter 3.20, thus, funding may also be a factor for classification.

PNP is included in GOV.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Enhanced and detailed categories for personnel, especially regarding researchers.

The coverage is not fully in accordance with the national accounts, we question some institutions which are classified in BES by the national accounts, science they are mainly funded by government. We refer to FM Chapter 3.20, thus, funding may also be a factor for classification.

PNP is included in GOV.

 

 

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
 -  -  -  -  -
           
           
           
           
           
15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure – GOVERD (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  
17047649
 116900 62700

Final data (deliveredT+18)

16761071 119268 63701
Difference (of final data) -286578 2368 1001
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  FTE: 119268; Labour Costs: 8850982 (in Thousands)
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  -

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs   Not available  
Data collection costs   Not available  
Other costs   Not available  
Total costs   Not available  
Comments on costs
We have not yet calculate the costs.

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)   Approx. 1000  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1   Not available  
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)   Not available  
Total cost   Not available  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name Ausgaben, Einnahmen und Personal der öffentlichen und öffentlich geförderten Einrichtungen für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Entwicklung
Type of survey

Census Survey, annual

Since 2014: online survey. 2003 - 2014: Mixed mode (postal and online). Survey by the Federal Statistical Office combined with relevant data taken from financial and manpower statistics for Federal, Länder and local governments. 
Combination of sample survey and census data  -
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  -
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  -
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  -
Variables the survey contributes to  

Personnel (HC, FTE) by sex, personnel categories, FORD, region

Expenditures by source of funds, FORD, type of costs, socioeconomic objective (every fourth year), type of R&D (every fourth year), region
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit No sampling but complete count based on household budgets and Internet search    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size      
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame      
Sample design      
Sample size      
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  We do not collect administrative data or produce pre-compiled statistics
Description of collected data / statistics  
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  
18.2. Frequency of data collection

yearly

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Information provider  Information is collected within a survey asking every single research institution -> micro level
Description of collected information  In the survey information about expenditure, revenues/funds and personnel is collected from every research institution using different questionnaires for financial and personnel data.
Data collection method  Online survey. The survey is regularly adjusted for better comprehensibility. There are detailed documents and support for the respondents. Beyond that there is a team which can be contacted with queries.
Time-use surveys for the calculation of R&D coefficients  -
Realised sample size (per stratum)
Mode of data collection (face-to-face interviews; telephone interviews; postal surveys, etc.)  online
Incentives used for increasing response  -
Follow-up of non-respondents  -
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  -
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  see 13.3.3
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  -
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  

 

R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:

Expenditures:

https://erhebungsportal.estatistik.de/Erhebungsportal/#kBFi78T5sQOW3BEb/unterstuetzte-statistiken/bildung/hochschulen/wissenschaft-forschung-ausgaben-und-einnahmen

Personal:

https://erhebungsportal.estatistik.de/Erhebungsportal/#TB2AeXEFvbf36rIN/unterstuetzte-statistiken/bildung/hochschulen/wissenschaft-forschung-entwicklung-beschaeftigte

Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  
18.4. Data validation

different data validation processes:

  • comparing the statistics with previous cycles;
  • calculation FTE/labour costs;
  • comparing personnel and expenditures at micro level;
  • investiganting inconsistencies in the statistics;

contact to respondents if inconsistencies or large changes occur.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Generally no imputations necessary (mandatory variables). 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years) The survey is conducted annually.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data
Current  data from survey already available are used for some institutions. If not available: Final data from the previous survey are adjusted with rates of change from other sources e.g. from public budget statistics or from annual business reports of the research institutions themselves. The adjustment is done separately for different types of institutions.
The data for Institutions with no detailed annual report are estimated on the basis of the trends of the past five years
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  Information of local units from personnel questionnaire were used to deviate expenditures
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items Since 1992 when the questionnaire was revised, the respondents have been asked to report the specific R&D coefficients of the statistical units and the distribution of the R&D expenditure to the relevant scientific fields. These R&D coefficients are applied in estimating the R&D expenditure and personnel
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  VAT excl.
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  -
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Description of weighting method   no weighting
Description of the estimation method  Non probabilistic methods: secondary data, previous year, industry averages
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top