Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: State statistical office of the Republic of North  Macedonia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

State statistical office of the Republic of North  Macedonia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Sector of Social Statistics

Department for education and science

1.5. Contact mail address

State statistical office, Dame Gruev 4, 1000 Skopje, Republic of Nort Macedonia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 11/06/2021
2.2. Metadata last posted 11/06/2021
2.3. Metadata last update 11/06/2021


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consists of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing units classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Revision 2).

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics.

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021. 

3.2. Classification system
  • The distribution of principal economic activity and by product field are based on Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (NACE Rev. 2);
  • The local unit for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics;
  • The distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) are based on Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS);
  • The fields of research and development are based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
   
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  
Socioeconomic objective (SEO)  
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector  
Hospitals and clinics  
Inclusion of units that primary don`t belong to BES  
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  
External R&D personnel  
Clinical trials  
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from Rest of the world by sector - availability  
Payments to Rest of the world by sector - availability  
R&D expenditure of foreign affiliates - coverage  
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No)  
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure  
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years  
Source of funds  
Type of R&D  
Type of costs  
Economic activity of the unit  
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72)  
Product filed  
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure  
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years  
Function  
Qualification  
Age  
Citizenship  
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years  
Function  
Qualification  
Age  
Citizenship  
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

Employess working less than full time in the field of research and development, are shown those employees working in the field of research and development only part of full time, less than 90% and more than 10%.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
     
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

Statistical unit is each business entity is defined in the concept 3.3.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some units for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population  Target population covers all subjects engaged in the research and development activity (all subjects known or supposed to perform R&D).  
Estimation of the target population size    
Size cut-off point    
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services)    
NACE/ISIC classes covered    
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population  Included are all public research institutions, research units in business entities in the area of economy, public higher education institutions, other institutions and establishments and business entities in the area of economy which are not registered for research and development activity
Included are companies whose records are kept in the Register of the Ministry of Science, Education and those companies that were engaged in R&D but are not listed in the Register.
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer  Various sources are used to indentify R&D performers:
- registered for performing research activity (registered into the Register of scientific institutions at the Ministry of Education and Science, according to the Law on Scientific and Research Activity
- not registered at the Ministry of Education and Science
- research organizations according to a special Law (Macedonian Academy of Science and Arts, public higher education institutions and academies)
- public higher education institutions;
- business register - enterprises with the main activity in NACE 72
-enterprises with the main activity outside NACE 72 but are known to perform R&D
- companies that received funds for R&D from government funds (subsidies, grants etc.)
- enterprises that have reported R&D activity in previous R&D surveys
- enterprises that have reported R&D activity in Annual survey for Gross fixed capital formation
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  no
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  no
Estimation of the frame population  

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Number.


5. Reference Period Top

Year.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

Legal acts / agreements

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  
Legal acts  
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts)  
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts)  
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts)  
Planned changes of legislation  
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

All individual or personal data, in each phase of statistical processing, are treated as confidential data and may be used only for statistical purposes. When releasing data from this survey at an aggregated level, there is no need for additional data treatment for the purpose of ensuring confidentiality.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Data are released in accordance with the Release Calendar, which is published on the web site of the State Statistical Office. The Release Calendar is prepared annually before the beginning of each year and is updated quarterly.

8.2. Release calendar access

http://www.stat.gov.mk/Kalendar_nov_en.aspx

8.3. Release policy - user access

In accordance with the dissemination policy, all users have equal access to statistical data at the same time. Data are released on the web site at the same time for all users, which are informed with the Release Calendar, and no user has privileged access.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  N  
Ad-hoc releases    

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Mean of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y  Data are disseminated to users in more extensive publication Research and Development activity, 2017, in Macedonian and English, in electronic version http://www.stat.gov.mk/PrikaziPublikacija_1.aspx?rbr=786 . Data on R&D are also included in Statistical yearbook, which is available in paper and electronic publication and on http://www.stat.gov.mk/PrikaziPublikacija_1.aspx?rbr=770.
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

   

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Some of data are available on makstat database http://makstat.stat.gov.mk/pxweb2007bazi/Database/StatisticsBySubject/Education/Science/Science.asp

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  
Access cost policy  
Micro-data anonymisation rules  
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y    
CD-ROMs    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests    
Other      

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

'Methodological explanations that are part of the publication ''Research & development activity, 2015''. http://www.stat.gov.mk/Publikacii/2.4.16.16.pdf'

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  Users generally have no additional questions or requests for further clarifications.
Measure to increase clarity  National system of quality management is under development.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   Not known


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

The commitment of the SSO to ensuring quality of products and services is described in the Law on State Statistics, the Strategy of the State Statistical Office (http://www.stat.gov.mk/ZaNas_en.aspx?id=6) and the Quality Policy of the State Statistical Office (http://www.stat.gov.mk/pdf/Politika_za_kvalitet_en.pdf), as well as in the continuous efforts for harmonisation with the European Statistics Code of Practice. The main aspects and procedures for quality management in the phases and sub-phases of the Statistical Business Process Model, as well as the good practices for ensuring quality are documented in the internal document called “Guide for ensuring quality of statistical processes”. Input and output metadata, as well as relevant quality indicators for certain sub-processes are described in the document “Guide for survey managers”.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

High quality.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  Eurostat, European Commission  data analysis, publishing
 Ministry of Education and Science, Ministry of Economy, other ministries  data analysis, sectoral comparisons, policy documents, strategies and reports, progress evaluation
 OECD  data analysis
 Chamber of Commerce  data analysis
3 Media data publishing and analysis
4 Education and research institutions, students  analysis, ad hoc data requests
5 Enterprises data analysis

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, Other Ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics not available
Short description of the feedback received  not available
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

In terms of the indicators provided by Regulation. 995/2012 of the European Commission, SSO provides about 50% of them.

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds            
Type of R&D            
Type of costs            
Socioeconomic objective            
Region            
FORD            
Type of institution            

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex            
Function            
Qualification            
Age            
Citizenship            
Region            
FORD            
Type of institution            
Economic activity            
Product field            
Employment size class            

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex            
Function            
Qualification            
Age            
Citizenship            
Region            
FORD            
Type of institution            
Economic activity            
Product field            
Employment size class            

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
           
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure              
Total R&D personnel in FTE              
Researchers in FTE              

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure          
Total R&D personnel in FTE          
Researchers in FTE          

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

N/A

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure      
R&D personnel (FTE)      

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees 10-49 employees 50-249 employees 250-499 employees 500 and more employees TOTAL
R&D expenditure            
R&D personnel (FTE)            
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 

 

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)      
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)      
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 10-49 50-249 250-499 500+ TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)            
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)            
Misclassification rate            
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 10-49 50-249 250-499 500+ TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)            
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)            
Misclassification rate            
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
  0-9 employees

10-49 employees

50-249 employees 250-499 employees 500 and more employees TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample            
Total number of units in the sample            
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)            
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)            
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE
  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample      
Total number of units in the sample      
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted)      
Unit Non-response rate (weighted)      

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Not requested.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  
Data collection method employed  
Response rate of this type of survey  
The main reasons of non-response identified  
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)    n/a    n/a    n/a
Imputation (Y/N)    n/a    n/a    n/a
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used    n/a    n/a      n/a
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  
Total R&D personnel in FTE  
Researchers in FTE  
13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied  Data keying in Access, data processing(cleaning the base, tabulation, calculation etc) in SAS
Estimates of data entry errors  Not known.
Variables for which coding was performed  Fields of science, socio-economic objectives according to NABS, specially made NACE activity groups.
Estimates of coding errors  Not known.
Editing process and method  Data entry is performed after the questionnaire has been checked and corrected in cooperation with respondents. After all questionnaires have been entered, data are again logically and mathematically controlled using predefined editing rules. No processing errors are known.
Procedure used to correct errors  Re-contact with information provider.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period:

b) Date of first release of national data:

c) Lag (days):

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period:

b) Date of first release of national data:

c) Lag (days):

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)    
Delay (days)     
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

The data are disseminated on national level. Comparability is ensured on international level.

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 or Frascati manual paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  No  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39. No   
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). No   
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). No   
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25    
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  No  
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59. No   
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). No   
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  No  
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  No  
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines.  No  
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.11.  No  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.4.  No  
Reference period for the main data Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 4-6.  No  
Reference period for all data Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 4-6. No   
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table list a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities    
Data collection method    
Cooperation with respondents    
Follow-up of non-respondents    
Data processing methods    
Treatment of non-response    
Data weighting    
Variance estimation    
Data compilation of final and preliminary data    
Survey type    
Sample design    
Survey questionnaire    
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)      
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D personnel (FTE)      
  Function      
  Qualification      
R&D expenditure      
Source of funds      
Type of costs      
Type of R&D      
Other      

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years
15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Coherence between areas is partially provided.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
           
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS
15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)      
Final data (delivered T+18)      
Difference (of final data)  Final data only  Final data only  Final data only
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1)  
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs    
Data collection costs    
Other costs    
Total costs    
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)    
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1    
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)    
Total cost    

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name   Survey on Research and Development activity
Type of survey  Census survey
Combination of sample survey and census data  
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  n/a
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  n/a
Variables the survey contributes to  
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit      
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size      
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame      
Sample design      
Sample size      
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  
Description of collected data / statistics  
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  Annual survey
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum)  
Mode of data collection  
Incentives used for increasing response  
Follow-up of non-respondents  
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  
18.4. Data validation

Data validation is done in accordance with the defined criteria for control. Initial check of the data is done by the responsible person for the survey in the subject matter department while receiving the completed questionnaires. Data validation is done after data entry too.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees 10-49 employees 50-249 employees 250-499 employees 500 and more employees TOTAL
R&D expenditure            
R&D personnel (FTE)            
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure      
R&D personnel (FTE)      

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)     annual survey
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  Annual survey, data are transmitted within 10 months after the end of the reference period
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method  
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description)  
Variables used for weighting  
Calibration method and the software used  
Estimation  
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top