Research and development (R&D) (rd)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Iceland


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Iceland

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Business trends and structure

1.5. Contact mail address

Borgartun 21a

150 Reykjavik

Iceland


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 10/11/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 10/11/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 10/11/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Business enterprise R&D (BERD) measure research and experimental development (R&D) performed in the business enterprise sector, i.e. R&D expenditure and R&D personnel. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the business enterprise sector consists of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. The results are related to the population of all R&D performing units classified in Sections A to U of the common statistical classification of economic activities as established by Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council (NACE Revision 2).

The main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics.

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021

3.2. Classification system
  • The distribution of principal economic activity and by product field are based on Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (NACE Rev. 2);
  • The local unit for the statistics are compiled at regional level according to NUTS 2 – Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics;
  • The distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) are based on Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS);
  • The fields of research and development are based on Classification and distribution by Fields of Research and Development (FORD).
3.2.1. Additional classifications
Additional classification used Description
ESA 2010, classification by sector  Used for sector classification.
   
   
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D The OECD definitions of R&D from Frascati 7.0 (with a five-point criteria) applied since 2016 data collection, for reference year 2015.
Fields of Research and Development (FORD)  Collected for HES and GOV.
Socioeconomic objective (SEO)  Not collected.
3.3.2. Sector institutional coverage
Business enterprise sector Legal units in ESA-2010 sectors 11 (non-financial corporations), 12 (financial corporations), 14 (households) and 15 (non-profit institutions serving households).
Hospitals and clinics Hospitals (other than university hospitals) are included in the Government sector.
Inclusion of units that primary don`t belong to BES Inclulded with BES.
3.3.3. R&D variable coverage
R&D administration and other support activities  No intentional deviation from manual.
External R&D personnel  Cost on external personnel is included in Other current cost of intramural R&D. External personnel are included in total R&D personnel. 
Clinical trials  Clinical trials not excluded.
3.3.4. International R&D transactions
Receipts from Rest of the world by sector - availability  Not collected.
Payments to Rest of the world by sector - availability  Not collected.
R&D expenditure of foreign affiliates - coverage  Not collected.
3.3.5. Extramural R&D expenditures

According to the Frascati Manual, expenditure on extramural R&D (i.e. R&D performed outside the statistical unit) is not included in intramural R&D performance totals (FM, §4.12).

Data collection  on extramural R&D expenditure (Yes/No) Yes; collected, mainly for quality control purposes; has not been published yet.
Method for separating extramural R&D expenditure from intramural R&D expenditure The difference is emphasised in the definition and  by having an item on extramural R&D that's seperate from intramural R&D.
Difficulties to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D expenditure No difficulties have come up lately.
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

See below.

3.4.1. R&D expenditure
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Source of funds Answer options intended to distinguish internal funds from external funds and transfer funds from exchange funds. Respondents have found the answer options confusing (not knowing where to put funding by shareholders).
Type of R&D No deviation from Frascati manual recommendations.
Type of costs No deviation from Frascati manual recommendations.
Economic activity of the unit Main economic activity of response unit.
Economic activity of industry served (for enterprises in ISIC/NACE 72) Not collected.
Product filed  Not collected.
Defence R&D - method for obtaining data on R&D expenditure Not applicable in Iceland.
3.4.2. R&D personnel

See below.

3.4.2.1. R&D personnel – Head Counts (HC)
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Function Researchers, technicians, other supporting staff.
Qualification PhD, for researchers.
Age Not collected.
Citizenship Not collected.
3.4.2.2. R&D personnel – Full Time Equivalent (FTE)
Coverage of years Calendar year.
Function Researchers, technicians, other supporting staff.
Qualification PhD, for researchers.
Age Not collected.
Citizenship Not collected.
3.4.2.3. FTE calculation

 "Average % of time spent on R&D" asked in survey, then turned into FTE.

3.4.2.4. R&D personnel - Cross-classification by function and qualification
Cross-classification Unit Frequency
 Qualification not available.    
     
     
3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit is the legal unit.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The objective of the European R&D statistics is to cover all intramural R&D activities. In line with this objective the target population for the national R&D survey of the Business Enterprise Sector should consist of all R&D performing units (including all R&D performers – occasional and continuous, known and unknown - in all branches and size classes) belonging to this sector. In practice however, countries in their R&D surveys might exclude some units for which R&D activities are deemed to be non-existent or negligible, in order to limit the response burden or due to budgetary constraints.

 

  Target population when sample/census survey is used for collection of raw data Target population when administrative data or pre-compiled statistics are used
Definition of the national target population All R&D performing units.  N/A
Estimation of the target population size Based on administrative data and data collection of previous years, dating back to 2014.  N/A
Size cut-off point No cut of point.  N/A
Size classes covered (and if different for some industries/services) All size classes surveyed.  N/A
NACE/ISIC classes covered 1-99  N/A
3.6.2. Frame population – Description

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Method used to define the frame population All legal units registered in NACE 72 were directly surveyed; all legal units registered with 50+ persons employed were directly surveyed; other legal that had been identified as R&D performers (through previous R&D/CIS surveys, grant applications or other administrative data) also surveyed. 
Methods and data sources used for identifying a unit as known or supposed R&D performer List of applicants for grants for innovation and research and development activity, administered by Rannsóknamiðustöð Íslands - Rannís (owner: Rannís); information on tax exemptions for R&D&I from tax returns (owner: Statistics Iceland); results from previous R&D and CIS surveys. 
Frequency and the methods applied for inclusion R&D performers not known and not supposed to perform R&D  The 2014 survey had targeted a much larger pool of enterprises; at this stage it was not considered necessary to go beyond the list of enterprises identified as potential R&D-performers along with large enterprises and enterprises operating in NACE 72, Scientific research and development.
Number of “new”1) R&D enterprises that have been identified and included in the target population  Not applicable.
Systematic exclusion of units from the process of updating the target population  Legal units were not excluded automatically, beyond the methodology described above.
Estimation of the frame population 894 legal units.

1)       i.e. enterprises previously not known or not supposed to perform R&D

3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Expenditure: ISK 1000 (Thousand Icelandic krónas (isk).)

R&D personell: number of persons

R&D FTE: number of FTE

Type of R&D: percent of R&D expenditure


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year.


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

Legal acts / agreements

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

6.1.2. National legislation
Existence of R&D specific statistical legislation  N/A
Legal acts  N/A
Obligation of responsible organisations to produce statistics (as derived from the legal acts) Statistics Iceland has legal obligations to collect and compile national statistics, in accordance with regulation: 
Right of responsible organisations to collect data – obligation of (natural / legal) persons to provide raw and administrative data (as derived from the legal acts) Included in the regulation cited above.
Obligation of responsible organisations to protect confidential information from disclosure  (as derived from the legal acts) Included in the regulation cited above.
Rights of access of third organisations / persons to data and statistics (as derived from the legal acts) The data collected by Statistics Iceland is confidential, for legally defined purposes, and third parties are not given access to it. 
Planned changes of legislation  N/A
6.1.3. Standards and manuals

- Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

 Section III of regulation 'Lög um Hagstofu Íslands og opinbera hagskýrslugerð, nr. 163, 21. desember 2007' establishes that any information concerning identifiable individuals or legal units has to be treated as confidential.

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

 All survey staff is bound by the data confidentiality.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Data cells that are considered confidential are flagged as such.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Release calendar is updated on a year-to-year basis. The R&D data is typically released nationally before the end of October.

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.statice.is/publications/

8.3. Release policy - user access

A link to 'rules on statistical releases':

statice.is/rules-on-statistical-releases/


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly dissemination.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y  In accordance with the code of conduct of Statistics Iceland, public release of official statistics on the website of Statistics Iceland, usually with a press release on release date. No special access given to data.
Ad-hoc releases  N  

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Mean of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y https://hagstofa.is/utgafur/frettasafn/visindi-og-taekni/utgjold-til-rannsokna-og-throunarstarfs-2021/
Specific paper publication (e.g. sectoral provided to enterprises)

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Statice website: http://www.statice.is/statistics/business-sectors/science-and-technology/rd/

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  Access for research purposes can be requested 
Access cost policy  statice.is/services/
Micro-data anonymisation rules  statice.is/services/
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y    
CD-ROMs  N    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y    
Other  N    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

R&D Metadata, from the website of Statistics Iceland:

http://hagstofan.s3.amazonaws.com/media/public/2021/aef7bf6a-75ea-4302-9b60-10628ee03ea7.pdf

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, quality reports, etc.)   Description of methodology not available in English for the time being.
Request on further clarification, most problematic issues  Not directly
Measure to increase clarity  Not at this point.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  There are some clarity issues relating to key concepts - especially of R&D personnel statistics, such as the concept of 'researcher'. There are also certain issues with the concept of R&D itself, as it is usually not separate from innovation in general for other purposes, such as grants.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Centralization of tasks and responsibilities: a single expert in the unit of Business Enterprise Statistics has duties and responsibilities over every aspect of the statistical production, aside from the data collection from the business enterprise sector, which is handled by a dedicated data collection unit. By minimizing the number of personnel involved in the process, organizational complications are kept to a minimum. This is both manageable and feasibly considering the small scale and scope of the R&D industry in Iceland.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

This data collection followed the initial one of 2014, which had involved screening of enterprises and a much larger target frame population. With this second data collection Statistics Iceland has been able to scale down the task without chancing to seriously under- or overestimate GERD. The implementation of definitions from Frascati 7 also helped in making the data collection from enterprises more straight-forward. Other changes made to the questionnaire were based on the experience from the initial data collection.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  Various ministries  R&D expenditures: types of exp., sectors, and source of funds.
 1  Organisations of business and industries  R&D expenditures
 1  Universities  R&D expenditures
     

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, Other Ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes. )

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  We haven't done a user satisfaction survey, but we have presented the results to some ministries
User satisfaction survey specific for R&D statistics  Not applicable
Short description of the feedback received  The data collected, as published by Statistics Iceland seems to have met user needs.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available.

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability - R&D Expenditure
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Source of funds  Y  Biannually (from 2014)  Even years      
Type of R&D  Y  Biannually (from 2014)  Even years      
Type of costs  Y  Biannually (from 2014)  Even years      
Socioeconomic objective  Y  Biannually (from 2014)  Even years      
Region  N          
FORD  N    
     
Type of institution  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.2. Data availability - R&D Personnel (HC)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1999

 Biannually

 Even years      
Function  Y  Biannually  Even years      
Qualification  Y  Biannually  Even years      
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  N          
FORD  N  
       
Type of institution  N          
Economic activity  N          
Product field  N          
Employment size class  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.3. Data availability - R&D Personnel (FTE)
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Modifications - Description Modifications - Year of introduction Modifications - Reasons
Sex  Y-1999

 Biannually

 Even years      
Function  Y  Biannually  Even years      
Qualification  Y  Biannually  Even years      
Age  N          
Citizenship  N          
Region  N          
FORD  N          
Type of institution  N          
Economic activity  N          
Product field  N          
Employment size class  N          

1) Y-start year, N – data not available

12.3.3.4. Data availability - other
Additional dimension/variable available at national level1) Availability2  Frequency of data collection Breakdown

variables

Combinations of breakdown variables Level of detail
           
           
           
           
           

1) This question is optional. It refers to variables and breakdowns NOT asked by the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 (neither as 'optional'), if R&D data for BES are collected for additional breakdowns or/and at more detailed level than requested.

2) Y-start year


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
  Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
Total intramural R&D expenditure  5  4  2  3  1    + 
Total R&D personnel in FTE  5  3  1  4  2    + 
Researchers in FTE  5  3  1  4  2    + 

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5). In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for R&D.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy with regard to the main indicators
Indicators 5

(Very Good)1

4

(Good)2

3

(Satisfactory)3

2

(Poor)4

1

(Very poor)5

Total intramural R&D expenditure  X        
Total R&D personnel in FTE    X      
Researchers in FTE    X      

1) 'Very Good' = High level of coverage (annual rate of substitution in the target population lower than 5%). High average rates of response (>80%) in census and sample surveys (BES R&D). Full data consistency with reference to totals and relationships between variables in the dataset sent to Eurostat.  

2) 'Good' = In the event that at least one out of the three criteria above described would not be fully met.

3) 'Satisfactory' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) 'Poor' = In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 60% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) 'Very Poor' = If all the three criteria are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors is the coefficient of variation (CV).
Definition of coefficient of variation:
CV= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

13.2.1.1. Variance Estimation Method

Not applicable, as there are no samples.

13.2.1.2. Coefficient of variation for key variables by NACE
  Industry sector1 Services sector2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure  NA  NA  NA
R&D personnel (FTE)  NA  NA  NA

1)        Industry sector (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09, 10-33, 35, 36-39, 41-43)

2)        Services sector (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.2.1.3. Coefficient of variation for key variables by Size Class
  0-9 employees 10-49 employees 50-249 employees 250-499 employees 500 and more employees TOTAL
R&D expenditure  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA
R&D personnel (FTE)  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA  NA
13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 Chances of a significant coverage error are considered minimal, as the Business Enterprise Sector unit of Statistics Iceland is in a good position to keep a good overview of the field of R&D.

b)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 Track is kept of new enterprises, R&D performers from previous data collection and grant applications for R&D and innovation.

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.1.1. Over-coverage rate - groups

 

Groups Magnitude – R&D expenditure Magnitude – Total R&D personnel (FTE)
Groups/categories of the frame population that were not covered or were partly covered in the target population (unknown R&D performing enterprises)  N/A  N/A  N/A
Groups/categories in the target  population that were covered while they should not (i.e. units surveyed that should belong to another sector of performance than BES)  N/A  N/A  N/A
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Frame misclassification rate

Misclassification rate measures the percentage of enterprises that changed stratum between the time the frame was last updated and the time the survey was carried out. It is defined as the number of enterprises that changed stratum divided by the number of enterprises which belong to the stratum, according to the frame. The rate can be estimated based on the characteristics of the surveyed enterprises.

 

 By size class for the Industry Sector 
  0-9 10-49 50-249 250-499 500+ TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
Misclassification rate  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
By size class for the Services Sector
  0-9 10-49 50-249 250-499 500+ TOTAL
Number or surveyed enterprises in the stratum (according to frame)  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
Number of surveyed enterprises that have changed stratum (after inspection of their characteristics)  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
Misclassification rate  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A
13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones (e.g. difficulty to distinguish intramural from extramural R&D Expenditure). The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 Potential measurement errors are, at this point, limited to specifications on the level of source of funding and, in particular, R&D roles.

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 Effort is put into clear and concise definitions, however in the case of personnel data, fitting the data requirement with the realities of R&D in enterprises still presents a challenge.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non-response occurs when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two elements of non-response:

- Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected on a designated population unit.

- Item non-response, which occurs when data only on some, but not all survey variables are collected on a designated population unit.

The extent of response (and accordingly of non response) is also measured with response rates.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

The main interest is to judge if the response from the target population was satisfying by computing the weighted and un-weighted response rate.
Definition:
Eligible are the sample units which indeed belong to the target population. Frame imperfections always leave the possibility that some sampled units may not belong to the target population. Moreover, when there is no contact with sample units and no other way to establish their eligibility they are characterised as ‘unknown eligibility units’
Definition:
Un-weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Number of units with a response) / (Total number of eligible and unknown eligibility units in the survey) 
Weighted Unit Non- Response Rate = 1 - (Total weighted responding units) / (Total weighted number of eligible / unknown eligibility units in the sample)

13.3.3.1.1. Unit non-response rates by Size Class
  0-9 employees

10-49 employees

50-249 employees 250-499 employees 500 and more employees TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample 388 185 123 26 11 733
Total number of units in the sample 515 209 132 27 11 894
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted) 0.246602 0.114833 0.068182 0.037037 0.000000 0.180089
Unit Non-response rate (weighted) 0.246602 0.114833 0.068182 0.037037 0.000000 0.180089
13.3.3.1.2. Unit non-response rates by NACE
  Industry1) Services2) TOTAL
Number of units with a response in the realised sample

189

499 733
Total number of units in the sample

220

599 894
Unit Non-response rate (un-weighted) 0.140909091 0.166944908 0.180089485
Unit Non-response rate (weighted) 0.140909091 0.166944908 0.180089485

1)        Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)        Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47,49-53,55-56,58-63,64-66 68,69-75,77-82,84,85,86-88,90-93,94-96,97-98,99)

13.3.3.1.3. Recalls/Reminders description

Repeated reminders in the form of phone calls, with non-respondents being prioritised with consideration to administrative data and responses of similar enterprises.

13.3.3.1.4. Unit non-response survey
Conduction of a non-response survey  No.
Selection of the sample of non-respondents  Not applicable.
Data collection method employed  Not applicable.
Response rate of this type of survey  Not applicable.
The main reasons of non-response identified  #1: non R&D, #2: high response burden, #3: the misunderstanding that information from tax returns is sufficient data for us.
13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Definition:
Un-weighted Item non-Response Rate (%) = 1-(Number of units with a response for the item) / (Total number of eligible , for the item, units in the sample) * 100

13.3.3.2.1. Un-weighted item non-response rate
  R&D Expenditure R&D Personnel (FTE) Researchers (FTE)
Item non-response rate (un-weighted) (%)  0%  
6.48% 
 N/A
Imputation (Y/N)  Y  Y  Y
If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used

No item non-response for units that have responded, but imputation of unit non-response if the enterprise reported R&D last servey. Method: mainly information from last year survey and administrative data. 

Estimated from imputed current R&D expenditure, information from last year survey and administrative data. Estimated from imputed current R&D expenditure, information from last year survey and administrative data.
13.3.3.3. Magnitude of errors due to non-response
   Magnitude of error (%) due to non-response
Total intramural R&D expenditure  Not applicable
Total R&D personnel in FTE  Not applicable
Researchers in FTE  Not applicable
13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

13.3.4.1. Identification of the main processing errors
Data entry method applied Data is collected through CAPI, CAWI and CATI. Online data collection was done through unofficial software developed in-house, with data collected into a SQL database. Data from paper questionnaires and telephone interviews is entered manually into Excel, by field expert
Estimates of data entry errors  The only data entry errors that we have become aware of had to do with reported expenditures not being entered as the right amount. All responses were reviewed in light of that, with R&D expenditures being compared with responses on percentage of R&D of the enterprises' overall activity in a separate question. Follow-up phone calls were made for the confirmation of amounts for every case where it wasn't clear whether the amounts had been entered correctly. So the issue was addressed and beyond that we are not aware of any data entry errors.
Variables for which coding was performed No coding was required for variables that were sent to Eurostat and OECD.
Estimates of coding errors No coding errors
Editing process and method Any editing done to the data would involve checking with the respondents.
Procedure used to correct errors Phone calls to respondents.
13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Time lag between the end of reference period and the release date of the results:
Indicator: (Release date of provisional/ first results) - (Date of reference for the data)

 

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 17.11.2022

c) Lag (days): 332 days.

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

a) End of reference period: 31.12.2021

b) Date of first release of national data: 03.03.2023

c) Lag (days): 427 days.

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release).

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 10 18
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)                                         11                                14
Delay (days)   17 days  
Reasoning for delay Delay in the release of administrative data that was needed for the data processing.  


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. General issues of comparability

The national survey has involved an implemention of the updated Frascati 7.0 defintion of R&D since the 2016 data collection, for the reference year 2015. From what we understand, Iceland may have been the first country to base the survey on the Frascati 7.0 definition. Statistics Iceland's concerns about intenational comparability mostly concern the updated Frascati 7.0 definition being applied too firmly in Iceland, considering that updating the defintion does not appear to have affected the time series of any country, from what we can tell. 

15.1.3. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 or Frascati manual paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issues Reference to recommendations  Deviation from recommendations Comments on national definition / Treatment – deviations from recommendations
R&D personnel FM2015 Chapter 5 (mainly paragraph 5.2).  -  
Researcher FM2015, §5.35-5.39.  - It is possible that the concept of researcher does not resonate with respondents in the enterprise sector in the way that the concept is supposed to, and so some more conceptual work in needed for adequately colleting this data.
Approach to obtaining Headcount (HC) data FM2015, §5.58-5.61 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  - Personnel data is primarily colleted in terms of headcount.
Approach to obtaining Full-time equivalence (FTE) data FM2015, §5.49-5.57 (in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines).  - Average percentage of time spent on R&D used to deduce FTE from headcount.
Reporting data according to formula: Total R&D personnel = Internal R&D personnel + External R&D personnel FM2015, §5.25 - External personnel is included in the total personnel. There is no separate data on external personnel.
Intramural R&D expenditure FM2015 Chapter 4 (mainly paragraph 4.2).  -  
Special treatment for NACE 72 enterprises FM2015, § 7.59.  -  
Statistical unit FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraphs 7.3 and 7.7 in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). Legal unit as enterprise  Statistical unit is the legal unit, which is considered equivalent to the enterprise
Target population FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). R&D perfomers  
Identification of not known R&D performing or supposed to perform R&D enterprises FM2015 Chapter 7 (mainly paragraph 7.7 in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines). Business register, previoius surveys, applications for relevant grants or tax incentives, R&D news coverage.  
Sector coverage FM2015 Chapter 3 (mainly § 3.51-3.59) in combination with the Eurostat's harmonised Methodological Guidelines. Private non-profit sector covered as a part of the business enterprise sector.  
NACE coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.11.  -  
Enterprise size coverage and breakdown Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 7.4.  -  
Reference period for the main data Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 4-6.  -  
Reference period for all data Reg. 995/2012: Annex 1, section 1, § 4-6.  -  
15.1.4. Deviations from recommendations

The following table list a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national R&D statistics. The table gives the references in the Frascati manual, where related recommendations are made. Countries are asked to report on the existence of any deviations from existing recommendations and comment upon.

 

Methodological issues Deviation from recommendations Comments on national treatment / treatment deviations from recommendations
Data collection preparation activities  No deviation  
Data collection method  No deviation  
Cooperation with respondents  No deviation  
Follow-up of non-respondents  No deviation  
Data processing methods  No deviation  
Treatment of non-response  No deviation  
Data weighting  No deviation  
Variance estimation  No deviation  
Data compilation of final and preliminary data  X  
Survey type  No deviation  
Sample design  No deviation  
Survey questionnaire  No deviation  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
R&D personnel (HC)    2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured.
  Function    2013 R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
  Qualification   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
R&D personnel (FTE)   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
  Function   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
  Qualification   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
R&D expenditure   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
Source of funds   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
Type of costs   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
Type of R&D   2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured. 
Other    2013  R&D statistics were moved to Statistics Iceland and comparability with previous years could not be ensured.

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.2.3. Collection of data in the even years

Data in not collected in even years. Data is estimated for the even years.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. It reports results for variables which are the same or relevant to R&D statistics, from other national surveys and / or administrative sources and explains and comments on their degree of agreement with R&D statistics.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not available.

15.3.3. National Coherence Assessments
Variable name R&D Statistics - Variable Value Other national statistics - Variable value Other national statistics - Source Difference in values (of R&D statistics) Explanation of / comments on difference
           
           
           
           
           
           
15.3.4. Coherence – Foreign-controlled EU enterprises – inward FATS

N/A

15.4. Coherence - internal

See below.

15.4.1. Comparison between preliminary and final data

This part compares key R&D variables as preliminary and final data.

 

  Total R&D expenditure (in 1000 of national currency) Total R&D personnel (in FTEs) Total number of researchers  (in FTEs)
Preliminary data (delivered at T+10)  64379521  2664  1173
Final data (delivered T+18)  65231049  3009  1359
Difference (of final data)  851528  345  186
15.4.2. Consistency between R&D personnel and expenditure
  Average remuneration (cost¨in national currency)
Consistency between FTEs of internal R&D personnel and R&D labour costs (1) Internal personnel are not excluded from external personnel and therefore this data is not available. 
Consistency between FTEs of external R&D personnel and other current costs for external R&D personnel (2)  External personnel are not excluded from internal personnel and therefore this data is not available. 

(1)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the internal R&D personnel, excluding those who are only formally ‘employees’ (university students, grant holders, etc.).

(2)    Calculate the average remuneration (cost) of individuals belonging to the external R&D personnel (FTEs/other current R&D costs for external R&D personnel).


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  not separately available  
Data collection costs   not separately available  
Other costs not separately available   
Total costs not separately available  
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  not separately available  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1 not separately available   
Hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C) not separately available   
Total cost not separately available   

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Several separate activities are used for the collection of raw data or pre-compiled administrative data and statistics related to R&D. For simplicity, we call them surveys irrespective of whether they are sample surveys, censuses, collections of administrative data/pre-compiled statistics. This section presents the names of the surveys by sector of performance as well as methodological information for each survey. Depending on the type of survey and sector of performance, only the sections corresponding to that survey and sector are filled in.

18.1.1. Data source – general information
Survey name  Rannsókna- og þróunarstarf fyrirtækja 2021-2022
Type of survey  CAWI.
Combination of sample survey and census data  Census
Combination of dedicated R&D and other survey(s)  No sample survey this time.
    Sub-population A (covered by sampling)  Not applicable.
    Sub-population B (covered by census)  Not applicable.
Variables the survey contributes to  N/A
Survey timetable-most recent implementation  N/A
18.1.2. Sample/census survey information
  Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3
Sampling unit  Enterprises    
Stratification variables (if any - for sample surveys only)      
Stratification variable classes      
Population size  894    
Planned sample size      
Sample selection mechanism (for sample surveys only)      
Survey frame      
Sample design      
Sample size      
Survey frame quality      
18.1.3. Information on collection of administrative data or of pre-compiled statistics
Source  N/A
Description of collected data / statistics  N/A
Reference period, in relation to the variables the survey contributes to  N/A
18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
Realised sample size (per stratum)  Not applicable.
Mode of data collection Data collection online, with personalised log-in information sent via regular mail.
Incentives used for increasing response  None
Follow-up of non-respondents  
Replacement of non-respondents (e.g. if proxy interviewing is employed)  
Response rate (ratio of completed "interviews" over total number of eligible enterprises or enterprises of unknown eligibility)  
Non-response analysis (if applicable -- also see section 18.5. Data compilation - Weighting and Estimation methods)  
18.3.2. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  
R&D national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  


Annexes:
A transcript of the R&D questionnaire in Icelandic and English.
18.4. Data validation

Data is analaysed on the level of the response unit, comparing the data with responses of previous years (both for R&D and CIS), administrative data from the Statistics Iceland's Business Register, and qualitative data about the response unit. 

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.
Definition:
Imputation rate (for the variable x) % = (Number of imputed records for the variable x) / (Total number of possible records for x)*100

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by Size class
  0-9 employees 10-49 employees 50-249 employees 250-499 employees 500 and more employees TOTAL
R&D expenditure  3.38% 4.98% 1.52% 3.7%  9.09%
3.58%
R&D personnel (FTE)  4.57% 6.79%  3.79%  11.11%  9.09%  5.26% 
18.5.1.2. Imputation rate (un-weighted) (%) by NACE
  Industry1 Services2 TOTAL
R&D expenditure 3.81% 3.5% 3.58%
R&D personnel (FTE)  7.2% 4.56%  5.26% 

1)       Industry (NACE Rev. 2: 01-03, 05-09,10-33,35,36-39,41-43)

2)       Services (NACE Rev 2.: 45-47, 49-53, 55-56, 58-63, 64-66 68, 69-75, 77-82, 84, 85, 86-88, 90-93, 94-96, 97-98, 99)

 

18.5.2. Data compilation methods
Data compilation method - Final data (between the survey years)  Respondents asked to give estimates for current year, so data is collected for a period of two years every time.
Data compilation method - Preliminary data  
18.5.3. Measurement issues
Method of derivation of regional data  N/A
Coefficients used for estimation of the R&D share of more general expenditure items  N/A
Inclusion or exclusion of VAT and provisions for depreciation in the measurement of expenditures  N/A
Differences between national and Frascati Manual classifications not mentioned above and impact on national statistics  N/A
18.5.4. Weighting and estimation methods
Weight calculation method  No weights. Survey aimed to catch all R&D performers, with imputation used in cases of non-responses.
Data source used for deriving population totals (universe description)  Not applicable.
Variables used for weighting  Not applicable.
Calibration method and the software used  Not applicable.
Estimation  
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top