Enforcement of Immigration Legislation (migr_eil)

National Reference Metadata in ESS Standard for Quality Reports Structure (ESQRS)

Compiling agency: Ministère des Affaires étrangères et européennes - Direction de l'Immigration

Time Dimension: 2014-A0

Data Provider: LU9

Data Flow: MIGR_EILEQ_A


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Statistical presentation
3. Statistical processing
4. Quality management
5. Relevance
6. Accuracy and reliability
7. Timeliness and punctuality
8. Coherence and comparability
9. Accessibility and clarity
10. Cost and Burden
11. Confidentiality
12. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: EUROPEAN STATISTICAL DATA SUPPORT

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministère des Affaires étrangères et européennes - Direction de l'Immigration

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Direction de l'Immigration

1.5. Contact mail address

33, boulevard Roosevelt
L-2450 Luxembourg


2. Statistical presentation Top
2.1. Data description

1. Introduction

This metadata information is provided by Luxembourg's authorities to ensure compliance with the requirements of Articles 5 and 7 of Regulation 862/2007 on Community Statistics on Migration and International Protection.

As required by Article 9 of the Regulation 862/2007, Member States must report to Eurostat on the data sources used, the reasons for the selection of these sources and the effects of the selected data on the quality of the statistics. Member States shall provide it with all the information necessary to evaluate the quality, comparability and completeness of the statistical information.

The reference terms for the assessment of quality compliance are provided by Eurostat in the EIL technical guidelines applied for 2014 reference period (See section 3.4 Statistical concepts and definitions from the EIL ESMS file).

 

2. General description of the statistical domain at national level

- EIL National System (level of development, main changes that affected the system in the last years and further development)

Collection and aggregation on EIL relevant data is performed by 2 entities: Immigration Directorate of the Ministry for Foreign and European Affairs and the Central Airport Unit of the Grand-Ducal Police. In order to ensure high availability and reliability of data, data collection and preparation has been undergoing a significant improvement process those last years.

- Legal national framework relevant for EIL statistics

Data collected in the framework of EIL statistics complies with the provisions of the 2008 Law on free circulation of persons and immigration.

- Institutional infrastructure (list of the institutions involved in managing the EIL registers and the institutions involved in the production of the EIL statistics)

Direction de l'Immigration du Ministère des Affaires étrangères et européennes

Police Grand-Ducale - Unité centrale de la Police à l'Aéroport

- General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens refused entry at the external borders

Non-EU citizens refused entry at the border are registered by the Airport Police as the issue of the refusal.

- General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present

The Police report stating a Non-EU citizen was found to be illegally present on the territory is transmitted to the Immigration Directorate where relevant data is registered and recorded in a specific database.

- General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens ordered to leave

At the issue of a return decision (order to leave), relevant data is recorded in a specific database by the Immigration Directorate.

- General procedure for recording Non-EU citizens returned following an order to leave

If a Non-EU citizen has left the territory following an order to leave, relevant data is recorded in a specific database by the Immigration Directorate.

 

3. Main problems that affect the quality of the data and what tables are concerned including the compliance status with the definitions from EIL Technical Guideline

(See metadata information including concepts and definitions from the EIL ESMS file)

For data on entry refusals at the border and non-EU citizens to be found illegally present, the ImmigrationDirectorate relies on external data and information, as produced by the Police.

2.2. Classification system

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.3. Coverage - sector

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.5. Statistical unit

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.6. Statistical population

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.7. Reference area

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.8. Coverage - Time

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

2.9. Base period

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.


3. Statistical processing Top

-

3.1. Source data
  Presentation of the data source(s)/national registers
Third-country nationals refused at border  Grand-Ducal police
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present  Immigration Directorate
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave  Immigration Directorate
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship  Immigration Directorate
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third-country by type of return and citizenship  Immigration Directorate
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship  Immigration Directorate
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship  Immigration Directorate
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship  Immigration Directorate
3.2. Frequency of data collection
Frequency of EIL data collection at national level

 Frequency   (Delete non-relevant attributes)

Third-country nationals refused at border  Annual
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present  Annual
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave  Annual
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship  Annual
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third-country by type of return and citizenship  Annual
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship  Annual
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship  Annual
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship  Annual
3.3. Data collection

Not available.

3.4. Data validation

Description of the data validation system at national level

see table below

Validation procedure Applied
Checks of totals consistency Yes
Checks of magnitude of changes over time Yes
Using intervals of values for outliers/errors detection No 
Using visual validation (visual verification of the tables or the graph resulted) No 
Checking the data integrity over each processing step Yes
Using special programs/software for data validation No
Checking if the double counting cases are excluded Yes
Checking the consistency between Y2 and Y3 datasets No 
Checking the consistency between “TCNs subjects to an obligation to leave” and “TCNs who actually left the territory”. No 
Checking the consistency between “TCNs who returned to a Third Country” and “TCNs who actually left the territory”. Yes
Analyse the statistics reported by other countries  No 
3.5. Data compilation

Estimations used: Details on the estimations done for EIL statistics (methodology applied and the concerned categories and tables)

Not applicable.

3.6. Adjustment

Not applicable.


4. Quality management Top
4.1. Quality assurance

Not available.
New concept added with the migration to SIMS 2.0.
Information (content) will be available after the next collection.

4.2. Quality management - assessment

1. Description of the Quality management system at national level

As for most data submitted in the framework of EIL statistics, the Immigration Directorate is reponsible for production, it also ensures completeness and coherence of data.

 

2. General Quality assesment (Delete non-relevant attributes: Good quality/Sufficient quality/Poor quality) Details in case of sufficient quality / Poor quality
 Topics

Output/Product Quality

Process Quality

Institutional Environment

Third-country nationals refused at border Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present Sufficient quality Sufficient quality Sufficient quality Information on TCN found to be illegally present is produced by an external source (Police) and aggregated by the Immigration Directorate.
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship Poor quality Poor quality Good quality For the moment, data is not systematically collected. The Immigration Directorate is currently elaborating a data collection method.
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship Good quality Good quality Good quality  
  • Good quality (extensive quality) - covers all quality requirements and substantial quality checks are performed and a very good cooperation exists between institutions.
  • Sufficient quality (acceptable quality) - covers minimum requirements, but issues still exist and more information/validation is needed for a better quality assessment and acceptable cooperation issues exists.
  • Poor quality (inadequate quality) - the data do not meet the minimum requirements or there is not enough information for quality assessment and important cooperation issues exists.


5. Relevance Top

-

5.1. Relevance - User Needs

1. General aspects

The statistics collected under the Regulation 862/2007 are widely used in official publications and by a wide range of users at national, European and International level.

Main users of EIL statistics at national level
The EIL statistics produced are regularly used by national administrations: academic researchers and civil society groups working on a wide range of topics including the integration of immigrants, the development and monitoring of national asylum and immigration procedures, and the projection of the future population and labour force.

Following users of national statistics can be identified:

  • National statistics Office
  • EMN - NCP

Main users of EIL statistics at European and International level
The main users of EIL statistics are Eurostat, DG Home Affairs, EASO and Frontex. The statistics are used in several publications of the Commission, as well as in the preparation of regular reports, policy proposals and analysis. The statistics also provide an input to the EMN studies and reports that address specific issues of current policy importance.

 

2. EIL data publication at national level

Presentation of the EIL statistics published at national level

Relevant EIL statistics are produced at national level adapted to the needs of policy makers and other users, mainly in the framework of the Annual activity report of the Immigration Directorate.

Differences between the data provided to Eurostat and the data published at national level (Comparability of figures)

Statistics produced and presented at national level are limited to the field of return.

5.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Not applicable.

5.3. Completeness

Completeness of the data provided based on Articles 5 and 7 Regulation 862/2007 (mandatory data provision) and justification of the missing mandatory breakdowns and completeness of the data provided on voluntary basis.

Completeness of the data (Delete non-relevant attributes: Available/Not Available/Not applicable)
 Categories Availability Details related to not applicable and not available selected cases
Third-country nationals refused at border    
Citizenship categories Available  
Grounds of refusal categories Available  
Border categories (land, sea, air) Available  
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present    
Citizenship categories Available  
Age categories Available  
Sex categories Available  
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave    
Citizenship categories Available  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship Available  
Citizenship categories Available  
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third-country by type of return and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Type of return categories Available  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Type of assistance received categories Available  
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Type of agreement procedure categories Not Available  Data is not systematically collected.
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship    
Citizenship categories Available  
Destination Country categories Available  
5.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not applicable.


6. Accuracy and reliability Top

-

6.1. Accuracy - overall
1. Accuracy of the total provided for each dataset 
  The interval in which the real population could be comparing with the total provided
100% = high accuracy (total provided reflects the real measured population)
Details
Third-country nationals refused at border  100%  
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present  80-90% The exact number of TCN illegally present is unknown.
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave   100%  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship   100%  
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third country by type of return and citizenship   100%  
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship   100%  
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship   -  Data is not collected systematically.
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship   100%  

 

2. Accuracy of the total provided for each category (Delete non-relevant attributes for Accuracy issue: No/Yes; Overestimation/Underestimation and delete/change/adapt the text for impact percentage)
  Accuracy issue Description of the accuracy issue Details about the impact on the statistics reported
Third-country nationals refused at border      
Citizenship categories No    
Grounds of refusal categories No    
Border categories (land, sea, air) No    
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present      
Citizenship categories No    
Age categories No    
Sex categories No    
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave      
Citizenship categories No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship No    
Citizenship categories No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third-country by type of return and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No    
Type of return categories No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No    
Type of assistance received categories No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No    
Type of agreement procedure categories No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship      
Citizenship categories No    
Destination Country categories No    
6.2. Sampling error

Procedures and classifications used in case of missing information (e.g. unknown citizenship, age, etc)

Missing information is categorized as "unknown".

6.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable.

6.3. Non-sampling error

Not applicable.

6.3.1. Coverage error

Not applicable.

6.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate
Over-coverage                              (Delete non-relevant attributes: 0% / 1% / 5% / 10% / 15% / 20% / >20%)
  The proportion of cases recorded that do not belong to the target population* (%)
Third-country nationals refused at border 0%
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present 0%
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave 0%
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third-country by type of return and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship 0%
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship 0%

 *target population refers to the population that should be included (as it is specified in technical guidelines)

6.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

6.3.2. Measurement error
Double counting                                         (Delete non-relevant atributes:  No / Yes; 0% / 1% / 5% / 10% / 15% / 20% / >20%)

 

One person can be included more than once in the reference datasets Share of "double counting" cases in the total for the datasets Description of the non-compliance issue

Third-country nationals refused at border

No    
Third-country nationals found to be illegally present No    
Third-country nationals who are subject to an obligation to leave No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of return and citizenship No    
Third-country nationals effectively returned to a third-country by type of return and citizenship No    

Third-country nationals effectively returned by type of assistance received and citizenship

No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by type of agreement procedure and citizenship No    
Third-country nationals returned to a third-country by destination country and citizenship No    
6.3.3. Non response error

Not applicable.

6.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not applicable.

6.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not applicable.

6.3.4. Processing error

Not applicable.

6.3.4.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

6.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.

6.4. Seasonal adjustment

Not applicable.

6.5. Data revision - policy

Not applicable.

Not applicable.

6.6. Data revision - practice

Details related to the data revision policy and expected revisions of the data sent to Eurostat

In case of substantial errors, revised data is submitted.

6.6.1. Data revision - average size

Not applicable.


7. Timeliness and punctuality Top

-

7.1. Timeliness

Not applicable.

7.1.1. Time lag - first result

Not applicable.

7.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not applicable.

7.2. Punctuality

Problems with data provision to Eurostat in due time and the impact of these problems on the data quality provided to Eurostat

Data is provided in due time.

7.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Not applicable.


8. Coherence and comparability Top

-

8.1. Comparability - geographical

1. Provision of data using the Eurostat EIL Technical Guidelines and exceptions applied

Data submitted complies with EIL guidelines.

2. Details on categories of Non-EU citizens difficult to be classified using the reference definitions from EIL technical guidelines and the categories excluded from these reasons (excluded from the statistics reported)

No issue identified.

3. Description of records related to "Unknown" country of citizenship category

No information available on citizenship.

4. Description of records related to "Unknown" age category

No information available on age.

5. Description of records related to "Unknown" sex category

No information available on sex.

6. Establishing the reported ground in case of “multiple grounds” for the same refusal and the impact on double counting of the person in the same dataset

The methodological procedure of "one ground per refused person" is applied  as laid down in EIL Technical Guidelines (procedure of "higher” ground overrules the “lower” ground for refusal).

7. Type of "external border" applicable

Air border

8. The definition of “refused Non-EU citizens” applied

The Schengen Borders Code's refusal definition is applied for the Statistics reported to Eurostat.

9. The correspondence between the national system of “grounds for refusal" classification and Schengen Borders Code classification.

Schengen Borders Code classification is applied.

10. The definition of “Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present” applied

Data complies with EIL guidelines.

11. The definition of “Non-EU citizens ordered to leave” applied

TCN for who an administrative decision - order to leave was issued.

12. The definition of “Non-EU citizens returned following an order to leave” applied

TCN who effectively returnesdfollowing an order to leave.

8.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

8.2. Comparability - over time

Methodological changes between the present reference year and previous year(s)

In 2012, data source for Y2 changed. Since 2012, the Immigration Directorate collects and aggregates data based on Police reports.

Justification of the important changes in figures reported for the present reference year and previous year(s)

Not applicable.

8.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not applicable.

8.3. Coherence - cross domain

1. Links between the statistics on refused Non-EU citizens and the statistics on Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present.

Not available.

2. Links between the statistics on Non-EU citizens found to be illegally present and the statistics on Non-EU citizens with obligation to leave.

Not available.

3. Coherence between the EIL statistics and Asylum statistics

Data on EIL and Asylum statistics present a high coherence.

4. Dublin cases included in EIL statistics and the impact on the totals provided 

Dublin cases are not included in EIL statistics.

5. Inclusion of voluntary returned Non-EU citizens in the statistics on Non-EU citizens who actually left the territory 

Assisted voluntary returns are included in EIL data.

Links between the EIL statistics and Asylum statistics and details related to the asylum applicant(s) case(s) included in EIL statistics. 

European regulation does not foresee a such link. Data submitted complies with regulation.

8.4. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not applicable.

8.5. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

8.6. Coherence - internal

1. Links and differences between the Non-EU citizens with obligation to leave and Non-EU citizens who actually left the territory

Orders to leave and effective returns are not necessary executed and reported in the same reference year. For several reasons, not every TCN for whom an order to leave was issued, will actually return.

2. Links and differences between the Non-EU citizens who actually left the territory and Non-EU citizens who left the territory to a third country

In practice, most non-EU citizens leaving the Luxembourgish territory return to a third country.


9. Accessibility and clarity Top

-

9.1. Dissemination format - News release

Not available.

9.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Data on return is published in the annual activity report of the Immigration Directorate.

9.3. Dissemination format - online database

Presentation of the National online national database for EIL data accessible to the public and the accessibility procedure

Not available.

9.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not available.

9.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not available.

9.5. Dissemination format - other

Not applicable.

9.6. Documentation on methodology

Not available.

9.7. Quality management - documentation

Presentation of the available quality management - documentation

Not applicable.

9.7.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not applicable.

9.7.2. Metadata - consultations

Not applicable.


10. Cost and Burden Top

Not applicable.


11. Confidentiality Top

-

11.1. Confidentiality - policy

Not applicable.

11.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Not applicable.


12. Comment Top

The following classification is used for data availability at Eurostat level:

The term "not applicable" relates to the categories of data which do not exist in national legislation/administrative procedures and therefore such statistics cannot be issued.

The term "not available" relates to categories of data that exist in the national legal/administrative system but cannot be delivered under EIL data collection for various reasons (e.g. data cannot exist, data exist but are not collected, data are unreliable, etc.).


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top