'Dublin' statistics (migr_dub)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Swedish Migration Agency


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Swedish Migration Agency

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Planning Department

Unit for statistics

1.5. Contact mail address

Slottsgatan 82, 602 22 Norrköping


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 16/06/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 28/09/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 28/09/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

This metadata information is provided by the authorities of Sweden to ensure compliance with the requirements of Article 4.4 (Dublin statistics) of the Regulation (EC) 862/2007 on Migration and International Protection as amended by the Regulation (EU) 2020/851.

As required by Article 9 of the Regulation (EC) 862/2007, Member States must report to Eurostat on the data sources used, the reasons for the selection of these sources and the effects of the selected data on the quality of the statistics. Member States shall provide Eurostat with all the information necessary to evaluate the quality, comparability and completeness of the statistical information.

The reference document used for assessing the compliance of the concepts and definitions in this metadata file is the document Dublin statistics - Eurostat Technical guidelines to Dublin statistics (see Annex).

3.1.1. General description and overview of the statistical domain at national level

The Swedish Migration Agency does not officially present Dublin statistics. The statistics are presented on internal websites and in case of inquiries. 

3.2. Classification system

The Swedish Migrations agency usually uses the same classifications as Eurostat.

3.2.1. International and national classifications and breakdowns used
Classification Eurostat breakdown National breakdown
Request Total, Request, Re-examination request, Unknown Not officially presented at national level
Decision on request Total, Positive decision, Negative decision, Unknown Not officially presented at national level
Legal provision (Dublin criteria) Please consult the latest Technical Guidelines documentation (in Annex)

Not officially presented at national level

Duration of transfer Total, From 1 to 6 months, From 7 to 12 months, From 13 to 18 months Not officially presented at national level
Duration of response to a request for information Total, 5 weeks or less, Over 5 weeks, Unknown Not officially presented at national level
Sex Total, Males, Females, Unknown Not officially presented at national level
Applicant Total, Adult, Unaccompanied minor, Accompanied minor, Unknown Not officially presented at national level
3.3. Coverage - sector

Migration and international protection – Dublin statistics

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The Swedish Migration Agency does not officially present Dublin statistics. The statistics are presented on internal websites and in case of inquiries. 

The Swedish Migrations agency usually uses the same classifications as Eurostat.

3.4.1. Definitions and discrepancies
Concept / Variable Definition at national level Discrepancy from Eurostat definition
Request  Not officially presented at national level  --
Re-examination request  Not officially presented at national level  --
Request based on Eurodac  Not officially presented at national level  --
Transfer  Not officially presented at national level  --
Responsibility by default (Art. 3.2 First paragraph): no prior criteria applicable  Not officially presented at national level  --
Responsibility by default (Art. 3.2 Second and third paragraph): no transfer  Not officially presented at national level  --
Responsibility by default (Art. 29.2): transfer not implemented  Not officially presented at national level  --
3.5. Statistical unit

The text of Art.4 of the Regulation (EC) 862/2007 on Migration and international protection refers in general to statistics based on the number of persons and not on the number of applications. However, the article describing the 'Dublin' statistics (Art.4.4) refers to statistics based on the number of requests. Commission services recommend that Art.4.4 (more precisely 4.4.a, 4.4.c and 4.4.d) is interpreted as referring to the number of persons concerned by each request, decision and transfer.

3.6. Statistical population

Third country nationals submitting an application of asylum under the Dublin Regulation.

3.7. Reference area

Sweden.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Since 2015.

3.9. Base period

Not applicable.


4. Unit of measure Top

Number of requests, decisions, transfers.


5. Reference Period Top

Reference year 2022


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

The compilation of Dublin statistics is based on Article 4.4 of Regulation (EC) 862/2007 of 11 July 2007 which depicts in details the data provisions Sweden are bound to supply Eurostat with.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not applicable.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

See below.

7.1.1. Information on the existence of a national policy for (not) releasing the Dublin data before a certain time after the end of reference period has passed

There is no national policy for (not) releasing the Dublin data before a certain time after the end of reference period has passed.

7.1.2. Required confidentiality by law and signed legal confidentiality commitments by survey staff

Not applicable.

7.1.3. Potential micro-data access for research purposes by external users and confidentiality provisions applied

The main rule is confidentiality, if an external user would like to access classified information for research purposes the request from the external user will be subject to a confidentiality test. A request can be granted providing (and ensuring) that the information can be de-identified.

7.1.4. Procedures for ensuring confidentiality during collection, processing and dissemination, including rules for determining confidential cells

Statistical confidentiality is guaranteed by law, in chapter 24 article 8 in the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Act (OSL 2009:400) and article 7 in the Public Access to Information and Secrecy Ordinance (OSF 2009:641). The provision refers specifically to secrecy for the protection of individuals.

All staff at Swedish Migration Agency (SMA) sign legal confidentiality commitments stating that they have taken note of the relevant confidentiality provisions. Breaches of confidentiality are punishable by The Swedish Penal Code (1962:7800) in chapter 20 article 3. 

There are physical, technological and organisational provisions in place to protect the security and integrity of the data at SMA. Organisational provision are laid out according the legislation outlined in chapter 24 article 8 OSL and article 7 in OSF. Microdata are protected by absolute confidentiality by above mentioned articles in OSL and OSF. Only authorised staff, and as few as possible, are given access to sensitive data concerning statistical activities. For access to the statistics systems, there is an eligibility model based on process, role and eligibility.  In order to meet the legal requirements of the Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the possibility of gaining access to the operational views have been severely limited for the majority of the staff at the agency.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

No special data treatment done in regards to confidentiality.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Not officially presented at national level.

8.2. Release calendar access

Not officially presented at national level.

8.3. Release policy - user access

Not officially presented at national level.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Annual data transmission to Eurostat. Monthly national dissemination. 


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

Not available.

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

Not available.

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Not available.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not applicable.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Not available.

10.5. Dissemination format - other

Not available.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not applicable.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Not available.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not available.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Not available.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Not available.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Dublin statistics in Sweden follow the given guidelines given in art. 4.4 of Regulation (EC) 862/2007. However the underlying data in some cases exhibits various aspects of quality issues from events such as faulty registrations to uncertain unit definition to query limitations. 

There is currently a new data warehouse in development with the aim to significantly increase data quality and data retrieval capabilities. Response given in this metadata questionnaire may thus become obsolete in the future as the new data warehouse is being put into production.

11.2.1. Overall quality assessment, at dataset level

 Dataset

 Quality

Details in case of Sufficient or Poor quality

Incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Pending 'Dublin' incoming requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Pending 'Dublin' outgoing requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Incoming 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Incoming responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Outgoing responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Unilateral 'Dublin' decisions by partner country, type of decision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Decisions on incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Decisions on Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

Good

 

Pending incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

Poor

 

Since we are not able to determine (in our database) if the time limit has extended due to imprisonment or absconds, we use maximum time limit (18 month), before non-implementet transfers are excluded from data set.

Pending outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

Good

 

 

  • Good quality (extensive quality) - all quality requirements are met according to the standard quality criteria and in line with the Technical Guidelines for the data collection of Dublin statistics (Annex).
  • Sufficient quality (acceptable quality) - minimum quality requirements are met: minor issues exist which need to be improved.
  • Poor quality (inadequate quality) - the data do not meet the minimum quality requirements: important/many issues exist which affect the quality of the data and which need to be solved.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

The statistics collected under Regulation (EC) 862/2007 are used by a wide range of users at national, European and International level to cover various usersʼ needs.

 

Users of Dublin statistics : Eurostat, EUAA, Department of Justice, national authorities.

 

Unmet user needs (on statistics) and reasons why these needs cannot be satisfied (at national and international level) : Data in some cases exhibits various aspects of quality issues from events such as faulty registrations to uncertain unit definition to query limitations. 

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

User satisfaction not collected.

12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

85%

12.3.2. Completeness by dataset

Completeness is the extent to which all requested Dublin statistics are provided to Eurostat, according to the data provisions foreseen by Articles 4.4. of Regulation (EC) 862/2007 (as amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/851) and by the Technical Guidelines for Dublin statistics (Annex).

 

Dataset

Completeness

Details in case of Incomplete, Not available or Not applicable

Incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Pending 'Dublin' incoming requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Pending 'Dublin' outgoing requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Incoming 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete 

 

Incoming responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Outgoing responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Unilateral 'Dublin' decisions by partner country, type of decision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Decisions on incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Decisions on Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Pending incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

Pending outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

Complete

 

 

  • Complete - The statistics are complete: the dataset and all requested breakdowns are available, as foreseen by Regulation (EC) 862/2007 (as amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/851) and the Technical Guidelines for the data collection of Dublin statistics (Annex)
  • Incomplete - The statistics are incomplete: the dataset is available but some of the requested breakdowns are not available, as foreseen by Regulation (EC) 862/2007 (as amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/851) and the Technical Guidelines for the data collection of Dublin statistics (Annex)
  • Not available - The statistics are not available: the dataset is not available, that is all the requested breakdowns are missing, as foreseen by Regulation (EC) 862/2007 (as amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/851) and the Technical Guidelines for the data collection of Dublin statistics (Annex)
  • Not applicable - The statistics are Not applicable: the concept/process is not used or it does not exist in the country


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Dublin statistics in Sweden follow the given guidelines given in art. 4.4 of Regulation (EC) 862/2007. However the underlying data in some cases exhibits various aspects of quality issues from events such as faulty registrations to uncertain unit definition to query limitations. 

There is currently a new data warehouse in development with the aim to significantly increase data quality and data retrieval capabilities. Response given in this metadata questionnaire may thus become obsolete in the future as the new data warehouse is being put into production.

13.1.1. Assessment of the accuracy of the national Dublin statistics by dataset

Accuracy is the closeness of the data to the exact or true values that the statistics were intended to measure. Reliability is the closeness of the initial provided value to the subsequent (revised) value.

 

Assessment of the accuracy of the national Dublin statistics, at dataset level

Dataset

Accuracy

Summary of main sources of error in case of Good/Low/Very low Accuracy

Incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Pending 'Dublin' incoming requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Pending 'Dublin' outgoing requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Incoming 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Incoming responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Outgoing responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Unilateral 'Dublin' decisions by partner country, type of decision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Decisions on incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Decisions on Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Pending incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

Very Low

 See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

Pending outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

  Low

See 11.2. Quality management - assessment

  

  • High = 100 % accuracy. The reported statistics measure accurately the target population, as foreseen by Regulation (EC) 862/2007 (as amended by Regulation (EU) 2020/851) and as defined in the Technical Guidelines for Dublin statistics (Annex)
  • Good = 95 - 99 % accuracy. The reported statistics do not cover accurately the target population and a small part of the targeted population is missing, or a small part of non-targeted (erroneous) population is included in the reported statistics; the bias/error in the reported statistics is expected to be small
  • Low 80 - 94 % accuracy. The reported statistics do not cover accurately the target population and a large part of the targeted population is missing, or a large part of non-targeted (erroneous) population is included in the reported statistics; the bias/error in the reported statistics is expected to be large
  • Very low = less than 80 % accuracy. The reported statistics do not cover accurately the target population and a very large part of the targeted population is missing, or a very large part of non-targeted (erroneous) population is included in the reported statistics; the bias/error in the reported statistics is expected to be very large
13.2. Sampling error

Not applicable.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not applicable.

13.3. Non-sampling error

See below.

13.3.1. Coverage error

See below.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

See the file ‘Proportion of units (persons) reported in the statistics that do not belong to the target populationʼ in annex.



Annexes:
Proportion of units (persons) reported in the statistics that do not belong to the target population
Proportion - Sweden
13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not applicable.

13.3.1.3. Assessment of potential coverage errors

Dataset

Coverage errors - Discrepancies from Eurostat target population

Summary of main sources of errors in case of errors and/or discrepancies from Eurostat practice

Incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

Undercoverage - Some information about accompanying children is not stored in our current data system

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

Undercoverage - Some information about accompanying children is not stored in our current data system

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

Undercoverage - Some information about accompanying children is not stored in our current data system

Pending 'Dublin' incoming requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

 Undercoverage

Pending 'Dublin' outgoing requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of request, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Incoming 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Incoming responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Outgoing responses to 'Dublin' requests for information by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of response, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Unilateral 'Dublin' decisions by partner country, type of decision, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Decisions on incoming 'Dublin' requests by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

 Undercoverage

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Decisions on Incoming 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by submitting country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

 Undercoverage

Decisions on outgoing 'Dublin' requests based on EURODAC by receiving country (PARTNER), type of decision, type of request, legal provision, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

 Undercoverage

Incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

 Yes

 

Outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), legal provision, duration of transfer, sex and type of applicant

 No

 

Pending incoming 'Dublin' transfers by submitting country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

Yes

Overcoverage

Pending outgoing 'Dublin' transfers by receiving country (PARTNER), sex and type of applicant

 No

 

13.3.1.4. Average lag of registering (to the national database/register) the following administrative events
Event Lag in number of days Details
An incoming Dublin request from a partner country  0  
An incoming decision from a partner country accepting the request to take back/charge a person  0-2  
A decision made by the national authority to accept or to reject a request from a partner country to take charge/back a person  0  
13.3.2. Measurement error

See concept 13.3.4 Processing Error.

13.3.3. Non response error

Not applicable.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not applicable.

13.3.4. Processing error

Not applicable.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not applicable.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

See below concepts 14.1.1 and 14.1.2.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

- Number of days (on average) after the end of the reference period at which the country is able to report the first/preliminary data, at the earliest : 2 days

 

- Reasons for possible long production of the first/preliminary data and plans to improve the situation : In the event of a database failure. 

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

- Number of days (on average) after the end of the reference period at which the country is able to report the final data, at the earliest : 90 days

 

- Reasons for possible long production of the final data and plans to improve the situation : 

14.2. Punctuality

100%

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

100%


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not applicable.

15.1.2. Assessment of possible sources of lack of comparability between countries

Assessment of possible sources of lack of comparability between countries, due to discrepancies from Eurostat concepts, definitions or due to differences in methods.

 

# Topic Response  Explanatory details and assessment of the magnitude of error (where applicable)
1 Does the country report all persons individually (e.g. in case of families all persons must be reported individually)?  Yes Some information about accompanying children is not stored in our current data system
2 Does the country report each request/decision/transfer concerning the same person during the same year (even if multiple requests/decisions/transfers are made for the same person during the year)?  Yes  
3 For the data on “Requests based on Eurodac hit” and “Decisions based on Eurodac hit”, does the country report also children below 14 years old who are not fingerprinted?  No Some information about accompanying children is not stored in our current data system
4 In case a request for a person involves more than one partner countries, does the country report all requests it sent/received to/from all the partner countries involved?  Yes  
5 Where the request is accepted based on a different legal basis from the one on which the request was sent, does the country report the data based on the article (legal basis) on which the request is accepted?  Yes  
6 Does the country report only successful incoming transfers (i.e. only those where the country has effectively received the person on its territory)?  Yes  
7 Does the country report only successful outgoing transfers (i.e. those for which the country has undertaken all appropriate measures in order to send a transferee to another Member State)?  Yes  
8 Does the country report transfers for cases where the applicant otherwise travelled back to the Member State responsible on its own within the transfer time limits (without the country organizing the actual transfer)?  Yes  
9 Does the country report requests sent/received by mistake (i.e. when the actual partner country should have been different than the one intended)?  Yes  
10 Does the country report a person as adult or minor according to the age of the person at the date of the respective administrative event (e.g. the person was minor at the date of the request, but at the date of transfer the person was not a minor anymore)?  Yes  

 

11 Does the country carry out the Dublin/Eurodac check before the formal registration of the asylum application?  Yes  
12 For the data of “Article 3.2 first paragraph – Responsible by default: no prior criteria applicable”, does the country report any applicant for which the Dublin criteria do not apply? This means any person who applied for protection in the reporting country, as a first Member State of application, and for whom no Dublin criteria applied for him/her to be taken charge of by another Member State.

 Yes

 

13 Does the country report under the data of “Decisions on incoming requests” positive decisions accepting a request implicitly?  Yes  
14 Does the country report under the data of “Decisions on outgoing requests” positive decisions accepting a request implicitly?  Yes  
15 Does the country report under the data of “Decisions on incoming requests bases on Eurodac” positive decisions accepting a request implicitly?  Yes  
16 Does the country report under the data of “Decisions on outgoing requests bases on Eurodac” positive decisions accepting a request implicitly?  Yes  
17 For the data of Transfers, in case of different legal basis between the request and the positive decision to accept the responsibility to examine the application, does the country report the legal ground (LEG_PROV) on which the decision (acceptance of request) was based on?  Yes  
18 Does the country report under 'Incoming pending transfers' cases where the partner country did not implement the transfer within the foreseen time limits (Article 29.2)? Yes 

Since we are not able to determine (in our database) if the time limit has extended due to imprisonment or absconds, we use maximum time limit (18 month), before non-implementet transfers are excluded from data set.

19 Does the country report under ‘Outgoing pending transfers' cases where the country did not implement the transfer within the foreseen time limits (Article 29.2)?  No  

We do not report them at present

15.2. Comparability - over time

Comparability over time.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Since 2015.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

Only differences in definitions according to guidelines.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Variables pertaining to the individual refer to the most recent registration at the date of data extraction, reporting of the same month can thus vary depending on the date of data extraction.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not applicable.

15.4. Coherence - internal

No internal incoherence.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Regular statistical reporting and revising to EDAMIS estimated to 20 working days per year. This does not include time to implement changes in guidelines in regular reporting. 

Metadata questionnaire estimated to 10 working days involving 2 workers.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Data is revised continuously during the year.

17.1.1. Description of the national revision policy for Dublin statistics

European statistics are compiled according to Eurostat guidelines on the basis of common standards regarding the scope, definitions, units and classifications of the various surveys and data sources. The Swedish Migration Agency continuously revises previously published statistics on changes in historical data in the previous year. In case of major development/efforts that lead to improved quality of historical data, revisions are transmitted.

17.1.2. Number of revisions planned on average
Data revision practice National practice  Further details (if necessary)
Average number of planned revisions performed during a year (for latest reference year)  1  
Average number of unplanned revisions performed during a year (usually caused by the discovery of a mistake)  0  
Main reasons for revisions (new source data are becoming available, new methods/concepts, etc.) and extent to which the revisions improved the accuracy of the data Development of a new data warehouse  
Where the request is accepted based on a different legal basis from the one on which the request was sent, Member States have to report their data based on the article (legal basis) on which the request is accepted.

As far it is possible, this applies also to the data on outgoing and incoming requests. In case the requests are submitted/received in a different reference year than the decision was taken, data on requests shall be revised accordingly by both countries.

Does the country revise its data according to the above guidance?

 No  
17.1.3. Description of the main reasons for revisions

In the central database, in principle, all statistics relating to information about the applicant and their cases are stored. However, the structure of the database is inadequate from a follow-up perspective. The new Data warehouse that is under development will be based on more logical structures that make it easier to follow up data in a quality-assured way.

17.2. Data revision - practice

See below.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

The size of revision gives an idea of the stability of the data while direction is important to understand whether preliminary data tend to overestimate or underestimate the real target population.

 

Difficult to measure changes after revision.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

Swedish Migration Agency.

18.2. Frequency of data collection

Daily.

18.3. Data collection

Data is directly registered by operative personnel into the central database. Data is then transformed and retrieved daily by our data systems, from which data is extracted and repurposed as csv-files.

18.4. Data validation

No such regular national validation process. The act of validation and the extent of it is done at a case by case basis as seen fit by the person extracting the data. 

18.4.1. Validation procedures
Validation activity Performed Periodicity Details (methods and tools)
Check that the population coverage is accurate, as required according to the definitions of the Technical guidelines (Annex)  Yes    
Compare the data with data of previous periods  Yes    
Check for outliers  No    
Investigate inconsistencies in the statistics (checking the consistency of "Total" values over each variable)  Yes    
Verify the statistics against expectations and domain intelligence  No    
Confront the data against other relevant data (e.g. Asylum statistics, of the mirror data from the partner countries)  No    
Check retrospectively (a sample of) the data in the register/database in order to confirm they are accurate  No    
18.5. Data compilation

There are many cases of using several variables in conjecture to group data used on national level.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Not applicable.

18.6. Adjustment

No adjustments made.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

No adjustments made.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
Eurostat Guidelines on Dublin statistics - v. 3.1 - 2021