Community innovation survey 2018 (CIS2018) (inn_cis11)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Finland


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Finland

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Economic statistics

1.5. Contact mail address

FI-00022 Statistics Finland


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 30/10/2020
2.2. Metadata last posted 14/07/2021
2.3. Metadata last update 14/07/2021


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) is a survey about innovation activities in enterprises. The survey is designed to collect the information on different types of innovation,  various aspects of the development of an innovation, objectives of innovation activities, sources of information, public funding or expenditure on innovation.  It is aim is to measure the innovativeness of sectors and enable the analysis of the factors of innovation.

 The CIS provides statistics by type of innovators, economic activities and size class of enterprises. The survey is currently carried out every two years across the EU Member States, EFTA countries and EU candidate countries.

 

In order to ensure comparability across countries, Eurostat together with the countries developed a Harmonised Data Collection (HDC) questionnaire accompanied by a set of definitions and methodological recommendations.

 

CIS 2018 concepts and its underlying methodology are based on the Oslo Manual (2018) 4th Edition

 

New review of the CIS2018  aims to meet several objectives :

1: Reduce subjectivity and biases in the main CIS indicators

2: Improve reporting about innovation activities and capabilities in the firm

3: Ensure international comparability (including compliance with the OM4)

4: Broaden the basis CIS information on enterprise management

5: Take better account the diversity of enterprises in the EU

6: Improve reporting about external drivers and enablers of innovation

7: Improve timeliness

8: Ensure the feasibility of data collection

9: Ensure continuity with the CIS 2016

10: Improve reporting about the output and impact of innovation

 

CIS2018 is conducted under Commission Regulation No 995/2012. This Regulation defines the mandatory target population of the survey referring to enterprises in the Core NACE economic sectors (see section 3.3.) with at least 10 employees. Further activities may be covered on a voluntary basis in national datasets. Most statistics are based on the 3-year reference period (t, t-1, t-2), but some use only one calendar year (t or t-2).

 

Please consider CIS t to be the survey that refers to the same year of the quality report and CIS t-2 to be the previous survey e.g.: CIS  2018= CIS t then, CIS t-2=CIS 2016

3.2. Classification system

Indicators related to the enterprises are classified by country, economic activity (NACE Rev. 2), size class of enterprises and type of innovation.

 

The main typology of classification of enterprises in reference to innovation is the distinction between innovation-active enterprises (INN) and not innovation-active enterprises (NINN).

The enterprise is considered as innovative (INN) if during the reference period it successfully introduced a product or business process innovation, had ongoing innovation activities, abandoned innovation activities or was engaged in in-house R&D or R&D contracted out. Non-innovative (NINN) enterprises had no innovation activity mentioned above whatsoever during the reference period.

3.3. Coverage - sector

CIS covers main economic sectors according to NACE Rev.2 broken down by size class of enterprises and type of innovation activity.

3.3.1. Main economic sectors covered - NACE Rev.2

In accordance with Commission Regulation 995/2012 on innovation statistics, the following industries and services are included in the core target population. Results are made available with these following breakdowns :

All NACE – Core NACE (NACE Rev. 2  sections & divisions B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 )

 

CORE INDUSTRY (excluding construction) (NACE Rev. 2 SECTIONS B_C_D_E)

 

B: MINING AND QUARRYING

 

C: MANUFACTURING

10-12: Manufacture of food products, beverages and tobacco

13-15: Manufacture of textiles, wearing apparel, leather and related products

16-18: Manufacture of wood, paper, printing and reproduction

20: Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products

21: Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations

19-22: Manufacture of petroleum, chemical, pharmaceutical, rubber and plastic products

23: Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products

24: Manufacture of basic metals

25: Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment

26: Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products

25-30: Manufacture of fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), computer, electronic and optical products, electrical equipment, motor vehicles and other transport equipment

31-33: Manufacture of furniture; jewellery, musical instruments, toys; repair and installation of machinery and equipment

 

D: ELECTRICITY, GAS, STEAM AND AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLY

 

E: WATER SUPPLY; SEWERAGE, WASTE MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES

36: Water collection, treatment and supply

37-39: Sewerage, waste management, remediation activities

 

CORE SERVICES (NACE Rev. 2 sections & divisions 46-H-J-K-71-72-73)(NACE code in the tables = G46-M73_INN)

46: Wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles

 

H: TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE

49-51: Land transport and transport via pipelines, water transport and air transport

52-53: Warehousing and support activities for transportation and postal and courier activities

 

J: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION

58: Publishing activities

61: Telecommunications

62: Computer programming, consultancy and related activities

63: Information service activities

 

K: FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES

64: Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding

65: Insurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security

66: Activities auxiliary to financial services and insurance activities

 

M: PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

71: Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis

72: Scientific research and development

73: Advertising and market research

71-73: Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis; Scientific research and development; Advertising and market research

 

3.3.1.1. Main economic sectors covered - NACE Rev.2 - national particularities

No deviation.

3.3.2. Sector coverage - size class

In accordance with Commission Regulation 995/2012 on innovation statistics, the following size classes of enterprises according to number of employees are included in the core target population of the CIS:

  • 10 - 49 employees
  • 50 - 249 employees
  • 250 or more employees
3.3.2.1. Sector coverage - size class - national particularities

No deviations.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The description of concepts, definitions and main statistical variables is available in CIS 2018 European metadata file (ESMS) Results of the community innovation survey 2018 (CIS2018) (inn_cis11) in Eurostat database.

3.5. Statistical unit

Enterprise, most often referring to legal unit, in some cases group or part of a group operating nationally

3.6. Statistical population

Core target population are all enterprises in CORE NACE activities (see 3.3.1) with 10 or more employees.

3.7. Reference area

National data for Finland. No NUTS 2 level data available.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Several rounds of Community Innovation Survey have been conducted so far at two-year interval since the end of 90’s.

3.8.1. Participation in the CIS waves

 

CIS wave Reference period Participation Comment (deviation from reference period)
CIS2 1994-1996  Yes  
CIS3 1998-2000  Yes   
CIS light 2002-2003*  Yes  2000-2002
CIS4 2002-2004  Yes  
CIS2006 2004-2006  Yes  
CIS2008 2006-2008  Yes  
CIS2010 2008-2010  Yes  
CIS2012 2010-2012  Yes  
CIS2014 2012-2014  Yes  
CIS2016 2014-2016  Yes  
CIS2018 2016-2018  Yes  

*two reference periods can be distinguished for CIS light: 2000-2002 and 2001-2003

3.9. Base period

Not relevant.


4. Unit of measure Top

CIS indicators are available according to 3 units of measure:

 

NR: Number of enterprises and number of persons employed.

THS_EUR: Thousands of euros. All financial variables are provided in thousands of euros, i.e. Turnover or Innovation expenditure.

PC: Percentage. The percentage is the ratio between the selected combinations of indicators.


5. Reference Period Top

For CIS 2018, the time covered by the survey is the 3-year period from the beginning of 2016 to the end of 2018.

Some questions and indicators refer to one year — 2018.

The list of indicators covering the 3-year period and referring to one year according to the HDC is available in the Annex section of the European metadata (ESMS). 


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

CIS surveys are based on the Commission Regulation No 995/2012, implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

This Regulation establishes innovation statistics on a statutory basis and makes the delivery of certain variables compulsory e.g. innovation activities, cooperation, development, expenditures and turnover (see the Regulation). Each survey wave may additionally include further variables. 

In addition, the Regulation defines the obligatory cross-coverage of economic sectors and size class of enterprises.

6.1.1. National legislation

Statistics Act (280/2004), https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/2004/20040280 (Finnish/Swedish), http://tilastokeskus.fi/meta/lait/statistics-act-2802004_en.html

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top

CIS data are transmitted to Eurostat via EDAMIS using the secured transmission system.

7.1. Confidentiality - policy

In Finland, the data protection of data collected for statistical purposes is absolutely guaranteed in accordance with the Statistics Act (280/2004), the Personal Data Act (532/1999) and the Act on the Openness of Government activities (621/1999), as well as the requirements of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (2016/679). The data materials are protected at all stages of processing with the necessary physical and technical solutions. Statistics Finland has compiled detailed directions and instructions for confidential processing of the data. Employees have access only to the data essential for their duties. The premises where unit-level data are processed are not accessible to outsiders. Members of the personnel have signed a pledge of secrecy upon entering the service. Wilful breaching of data protection is punishable.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Statistics Finland's official guidelines on the protection of tabulated business data are applied in protecting innovation survey data. As in sample surveys, the basis for publishing the data is to not publish data on the statistical units belonging to the sample. In terms of protection, compliance with the threshold rule (3) is the primary procedure. In addition, the dominance rule is applied to data in euros.

Industry-specific data are mainly published on the 2-digit level. However, some of the most sensitive industries from the point of data protection have been combined with other industries. If there is need for protection after possible aggregations, or for some other reason, the cells to be protected are hidden.

In the tabulations submitted to Eurostat, sensitive cells are indicated as protected (also secondary protection), in which case Eurostat does not publish these data. However, the data can be used in calculating sum data at the EU level. Protection is indicated in accordance with instructions given by Eurostat.

The innovation data - without identification data - are also submitted to Eurostat's SafeCenter for research use.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Statistics Finland's release calendar lists all the statistical data and publications to be released over the year.

The statistics on innovation activity are nationally published in the spring around 16 months from the end of the statistical reference year. The release date is announced in Statistics Finland's release calendar. All statistical data can be found on the home page of the statistics http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/inn/index_en.html.

8.2. Release calendar access

http://tilastokeskus.fi/ajk/julkistamiskalenteri/index_en.html#?langs=fi

8.3. Release policy - user access

The data of the statistics on innovation activity are released to all data users simultaneously according to the date given in Statistics Finland's release calendar. All statistical data are available free-of-charge on the home page of the statistics http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/inn/index_en.html.

Assignments can be commissioned from the statistical data, that is, small free-of-charge or extensive charged reports can be ordered, for example from tiede.teknologia@stat.fi. Further information about the charges payable for Statistics Finland's services is available at https://www.stat.fi/tup/hinnat/index_en.html.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

CIS is conducted and disseminated at two-year interval in pair years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top

Accessibility and clarity refer to the simplicity and ease for users to access statistics using simple and user-friendly procedure, obtaining them in an expected form and within an acceptable time period, with the appropriate user information and assistance: a global context which finally enables them to make optimum use of the statistics.

10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
Dissemination and access Availability Comments, links, ...
Press release  x Published 23 April 2020 http://tilastokeskus.fi/til/inn/index_en.html
Access to public free of charge   x  
Access to public restricted (membership/password/part of data provided, etc)    
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

-              Online database (containing all/most results) : Yes

http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__ttt__inn/?tablelist=true

-              Analytical publication (referring to all/most results) : Yes

-              Analytical publication (referring to specific results, e.g. only for one sector or one specific aspect) : 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

Available http://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/en/StatFin/StatFin__ttt__inn/?tablelist=true

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

Innovation microdata are available in Eurostat and at national level in SAFE Centre.

10.4.1. Dissemination of microdata
Mean of dissemination Availability of microdata Comments, links, ...
Eurostat SAFE centre  Yes id of company and other identificators are removed
National SAFE centre  Yes id of company and other identificators are removed
Eurostat: partially anonymised data (SUF)  No  
National : partially anonymised data  No  
10.5. Dissemination format - other

No other dissemination formats.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

The implementation of the innovation survey follows the methodological recommendations issued by Eurostat, the Statistical Office of the European Communities.

The concepts are based, inter alia, on the OECD/Eurostat Oslo Manual.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Statistic's webpage covers national quality report. National quality report mainly covers same items than Eurostat's quality reporting included in this metadata description.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

When compiling statistics, Statistics Finland observes the European Statistics Code of Practice (CoP) and the Quality Assurance Framework (QAF) based on them. The Code of Practice concerns the independence and accountability of statistical authorities and the quality of processes and data to be published. The principles are in line with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics approved by the United Nations Statistics Division and are supplementary to them. The quality criteria of Official Statistics of Finland are also compatible with the European Statistics Code of Practice. The principles are also compatible with those of the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM).

More information about this is available on Statistics Finland's quality management pages.

Every year Statistics Finland conducts statistical auditing that helps to ensure the quality of statistics.

Quality issues are critical and controlled at every stage of stastistical production process of innovation data -- in data collection, in data editing and in validating the final data.

In the acquisition of innovation data, the aim is to attain an adequate response rate (target 70 per cent) for the data to be representative and for high-quality answers. All the illogicalities, shortcomings, faults and other types of errors are tried to be corrected. Data are corrected by various means, and the final data validated in multiple ways, such as
- identifying deficiencies and internal illogicalities in the data as well as other possible errors (checking of observation units, errors regarding thousands in the euro data and so on) and by correcting and supplementing them and
- by examining distributions of variables and comparing data and distributions with previous data and with existing comparison data (research and development activity and other business data).

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Following Eurostat's methodological recommendations and using multiple ways of controlling the quality at every stage of the statistical process quarantees reliable and as unbiased and correct data as possible for enterprises innovation activity.

CIS data covers however difficult items, such as innovation expenditure, which are very challenging for respondents to be provided. It is important to take this into account when using the data in order to avoid misinterpretation of the data.  


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

Key users of innovation data and innovation statistics are invited to discuss (meetings or other contacts) about the content of the forthcoming survey and about current information (user) needs before each survey round. At that time, the content of forthcoming survey, i.e. the EU CIS Harmonised Data Collection, is discussed and analysed together, and it is assessed whether there are themes and subjects, in addition to the harmonised data content, that should be covered in the national survey. This is a key tool for monitoring users' information needs and user satisfaction along with other user meetings.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
User group Short description of user group Main needs for CIS data of the user group Users’ needs
1 Institutions - European level Commission/DG ENTR Scoreboards, analysis
1 Institutions - European level Commission/Eurostat European statistics
1 Institutions - European level Commission/other possible DGs interested in innovation data Analysis
1 Institutions - International organisations OECD International statistics, analysis and comparisons, publications
1 Institutions - National level Ministry of Employment and the Economy and other ministries Follow up of development, analysis of innovation environments and ecosystems and other analysis covering innovation
1 Institutions - National level Innovation supporting organisations such as Business Finland (innovation funding and other promotion of innovation) Follow up of development, analysis of innovation environments and ecosystems and other analysis covering innovation
2 Social actors Employers association, trade unions Follow up of development, analysis and studies covering innovation
3 Media Mainly national media, TV, newspapers, magazines News and articles relating to business and economy
4 Researchers and students Research institutes and researchers in Finland Research and analysis, use of microdata, economic forecasts/prognoses
4 Researchers and students Research institutes and researchers in other countries Research and analysis, use of microdata
4 Researchers and students Students in Finland and abroad Exercises, thesis, other material for studies
5 Enterprises or businesses Enterprises mainly in Finland Benchmarking based on statistics

Key users of innovation data and innovation statistics (such as the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Employment, Business Finland or research institutes) are invited to discuss the content of the forthcoming survey and current information (user) needs before each survey round. At that time, the content of forthcoming survey and of the EU CIS Harmonised Data Collection is discussed and analysed together, and it is assessed whether there are themes, in addition to the harmonised data content, that should be covered in the national survey. This is a key tool for monitoring users' information needs and user satisfaction along with other user meetings.

Actual user satisfaction surveys have not been made concerning the innovation statistics.

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Actual and separate user satisfaction surveys have not been implemented for CIS. User satisfaction is tried to be quaranteed by discussing about the content of statistics with users already before every survey round (meetings with users described under 12.1). About satisfaction towards published information and accessibility to that based on previous rounds is also asked from main users at that same occasion. 

Also, if other feedback received, it is taken into account when surveys and publishing planned.

12.3. Completeness

The data are available on all legislated or otherwise desired indicators by industry and size category according to the EU recommendation. Industry data are presented mainly on the 2-digit level with the exception of industries that for data protection reasons have to be described as aggregated, for example.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not requested.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors for CIS data is the coefficient of variation (CV).

 

Coefficient of Variation= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

Formula:

 

where

13.2.1.1. Coefficient of variations for key variables

Coefficient of variation (%) for key variables by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 and more employees

NACE

Size class

(1)

(2)

(3)

Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73)

Total

 1.5

 2.4

 2.6

Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction)

Total

 2.0

 3.2

 3.2

Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73)

Total

 2.2

 3.5

 4.1

 

[1] = Coefficient of variation for the percentage of innovative enterprises (INN) in the total population of enterprises (ENT18)
[2] = Coefficient of variation for the turnover of product innovative enterprises with new or improved products (TUR_PRD_NEW_MKT), as a percentage of total turnover of product innovative enterprises [TUR18,INNO_PRD].
[3] = Coefficient of variation for percentage of product and/or process innovative enterprises (incl. enterprises with abandoned and or on-going activities) involved in any innovation co-operation arrangement [COOP_ALL,INN], as a percentage of innovative enterprises (INN).

13.2.1.2. Variance estimation method

ETOS and SAS procedures

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not requested.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under covered groups of the target population

The number of enterprises included in over-coverage was 62. These were distributed over different strata both in total industry and in service sector.

13.3.1.4. Coverage errors in coefficient variation

Over coverage units are eliminated from the estimation and the calculation of coefficient of variation.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

13.3.2.1. Measures for reducing measurement errors

Training of personnel working with data collection and data editing, profound studying the concepts and the content of the survey resulting in ability to help respondents when difficulties with responding.

CIS2018 HDC questionnaire was also tested as part of the implementation of new content.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response occurs when a survey fails to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.                                                                                                                                                                                              

There are two types of non-response:                                                                                                                                                                                      

1) Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected about a population unit designated for data collection.                                                                                                                                                                      

a) Un-weighted unit non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of units with no response or not usable response) / (Total number of in-scope (eligible) units in the sample)                                                                                                         

b) Weighted unit non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of weighted units with no response or not usable response) / (Total number of in-scope (eligible) units in the sample)                                                                                                            

2) Item non-response, which occurs when only data on some, but not all survey data items are collected about a population unit designated for data collection.                                       

a) Un-weighted item non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of units with no response at all for the item) / (Total number of eligible, for the item, units in the sample i.e. filters have to be taken into account) 

 

See 13.3.3.1. and 13.3.3.2.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

See below.

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted and weighted unit non-response rate by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees

Un-weighted and weighted unit non-response rate by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees

NACE Number of eligible units with no response  Total number of eligible units in the sample Un-weighted unit non-response rate (%) Weighted unit non-response rate (%)
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73)  1213  3587  34.4  
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction)  525  1671  31.8  
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73)  688  1916  36.7  

The number of eligible units is the number of sample units, which indeed belong to the target population.

13.3.3.1.2. Maximum number of recalls/reminders before coding

Three reminder letters, two email reminders and reminder calls by CATI (Computer Assisted Telephone Interviews) personnel.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

See below.

13.3.3.2.1. Item non-response rate for Turnover (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more employees)

Item non-response rate for Turnover (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more employees).

  Item non-response rate (un-weighted)  Imputation If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used
Turnover  0    

Information on turnover is missing only for marginal number of respondents. If missing, the SBS data is used.

13.3.3.2.2. Item non response rate for new questions

Item non-response rate for new questions in CIS t (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more employees)
 

NEW QUESTIONS IN CIS 2018 Inclusion in national questionnaire  Item non response rate (un-weighted) Comments
2.2         Customisation, Co-creation      
2.3         Partners in Customisation, Co-creation      
2.4         Turnover from Customisation, Co-creation      
2.7         Used patents and IRPs  x  1.7  
2.8         Buying technical services  x  0.0  
2.9         Innovative Purchases  x  1.1  
2.10       Using information channels  x  0.9  
2.11       Organising work  x  1.1  
3.5         Expectations met (product innovation)  x  1.4  
3.8         Expectations met (business process innovation)  x  1.5  
4.8         Enterprise group: inflows and outflows  x  4.5  
4.6         Total expenditure  x  5.1  
13.3.4. Processing error

 By multiple ways of controlling, editing and analysing the data it is targeted to the finalised data that does not cover any processing errors. 

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner.

14.1. Timeliness

The timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between data availability and the event or phenomenon they describe.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Timeliness of national data – date of first release of national level : 23/04/2020

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not requested.

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Date of transmission of complete and validated data to Eurostat (Number of days between that data and 30 June 2020) : -1


15. Coherence and comparability Top

Comparability aims at measuring the impact of differences in applied statistical concepts and definitions on the comparison of statistics between geographical areas, non-geographical domains, or over time.

The coherence of statistical outputs refers to the degree to which the statistical processes by which they were generated used the same concepts (classifications, definitions, and target populations) and harmonised methods. Coherent statistical outputs have the potential to be validly combined and used jointly.

15.1. Comparability - geographical

No deviations from ESS/international standards, concepts and definitions (OM4 and Eurostat guidelines).

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. National questionnaire – compliance with Eurostat model questionnaire

Methodological deviations from the CIS Harmonised Data Collection (HDC)

Questions not included in national questionnaire compared to HDC Comment
2.1 Importance of strategies  
2.2 Goods or services to meet user requirements  
2.3 The users withing customisation or co-creation  
2.4 Turnover from customized or co-created products  
3.11 Expectations for future innovation expenditure  
3.14 Tax incentives or allowances  
4.2 Person employed with tertiary degree  
4.5 Age of enterprise  

 

Changes in the filtering compared to HDC Comment
   
   
15.1.3. National questionnaire – additional questions

Methodological deviations from the CIS Harmonised Data Collection (HDC)

Additional questions in national questionnaire (not included in HDC) Comment
Utilisation of data in enterprises business activities  
Utilisation of digitalisation in enterprises business activities  

Cooperation with research organisations (universities, universities of applied sciences, research institutes) covering four questions
1. Innovation/other cooperation with different types of research organisations
2. Results from cooperation
3. Forms and change of meaning of cooperation
4. Importance of different cooperation partners to enterprises RDI in the near future

 
15.2. Comparability - over time

Due to important methodological changes in CIS 2018 driven by Oslo Manual 2018, the data 2018 cannot be directly compared with previous CIS waves.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not requested.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See the comparison between SBS and CIS data in the section 15.3.3 below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.3.3. Coherence – Structural Business Statistics (SBS)

This part compares key variables for aggregated CIS data with SBS data
Definition of relative difference between CIS and SBS data: DIFF = (SBS/CIS)*100

Comparison between SBS and CIS data (relative difference) by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees

NACE Size class Number of enterprises (SBS/CIS)* Number of employees (SBS/CIS)* Total Turnover (SBS/CIS)*
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  104.7  103.8  94.9
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction) Total  108.8  95.2  83.8
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  107.0  100.2  89.3

* Numbers are to be provided for the last year of the reference period (t)

Data not fully comparable due to minor differences in statistical units (legal units/enterprise units/groups). Data without K.

 

15.4. Coherence - internal

Not requested.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Confidential information on the production cost of the CIS.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

See below:

18.1.1. Sampling frame (or census frame)

National business register (BR)

18.1.2. Sampling design

Census for enterprises with 250 employees or more and simple random sampling for enteprises with 10 to 249 employees. NACE and size class as stratifiying variables. 

Total frame of CIS2018 covering 8 840 enteprises and overall sampling rate 41 per cent -- 33 per cent for enterprises with 10 to 49 employees and 58 per cent for medium size enterprises (census for large enterprises).

18.1.3. Target population and sample size
Sample/census indicator Number of enterprises
Target population  8840
Sample  3587
In case of combination sample/census:
Sampled units 3227
Enumerated units/census 360
Overall sample rate (overall sample/target population) 40.6
18.1.4. Data source for pre-filled variables

Variables and indicators filled or prefilled from other sources.

 

Variables/Indicators Source Reference year
 None    
     
18.1.5. Data source and variables used for derivation and weighting
Item Response
Data source used for deriving population totals  
Variables used for weighting  number of enterprises, turnover
18.2. Frequency of data collection

According to the Commission Regulation (UE) 995/2012, the innovation statistics shall be provided to Eurostat every two years in each even year. The data collection takes place every second year in year t-2 preceding the data provision.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Survey participation

Mandatory

18.3.2. Survey type

Combination of census and sample survey.

18.3.3. Combination of sample survey and census data

Census for 250+ employees and sample survey for enterprises with 10 to 249 employees.

18.3.4. Census criteria

250 employees

18.3.5. Data collection method

Data collection method

Survey method Yes/No Comment
Face-to-face interview  No  
Telephone interview  No  
Postal questionnaire  No  It is however possible to print out the questionnaire from Statistics Finland's web page and send paper response by mail
Electronic questionnaire (format Word or PDF to send back by email)  No  See the comment above
Web survey (online survey available on the platform via URL)  Yes  
Other  No  
18.4. Data validation

Not requested.

18.5. Data compilation

Operations performed on data to derive new information according to a given set of rules.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.

Definition of imputation rate:

Imputation rate (for the variable x) (%) = 100*(Number of replaced values) / (Total number of values for a given variable)

Definition of weighted imputation rate:

Weighted imputation rate= 100*(Number of total weighted replaced values) / (Total number of weighted values for a given variable)

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate for metric variables

Imputation rate for metric variables by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees:

NACE Size class Total Turnover (1) Turnover from products new to the market (2) R&D expenditure in-house (3)
Unweighted Weighted Unweighted Weighted Unweighted Weighted
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  -  -  3.0    3.7  
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction) Total  -  -  2.5    2.9  
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  -  -  3.6    4.8  

 

(1) = Total turnover in the last year of the reference period (t) (TUR)

(2) = Share of the turnover in the last year of the reference period (t) due to new or improved product new to the market in the total turnover for product innovative enterprises TUR_PRD_NEW_MKT/TUR(INNO_PRD)

(3) = R&D expenditure performed in-house (EXP_INNO_RND_IH)

Total turnover: missing information replaced by the data from SBS.

18.5.2. Weights calculation

Weights calculation method for sample surveys

Method Selected applied method  Comments
Inverse sampling fraction  Yes  
Non-respondent adjustments  Yes  
Other    
18.6. Adjustment

None

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
The Finnish CIS2018 in Finnish
The Finnish CIS2018 in English