Community innovation survey 2018 (CIS2018) (inn_cis11)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: ZEW - Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH Mannheim (Centre for European Economic Research)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

ZEW - Leibniz-Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH Mannheim

(Centre for European Economic Research)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Department Economics of innovation and Industrial Dynamics

1.5. Contact mail address

ZEW

L 7, 1

68161 Mannheim

Germany


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 25/11/2020
2.2. Metadata last posted 25/11/2020
2.3. Metadata last update 25/11/2020


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) is a survey about innovation activities in enterprises. The survey is designed to collect the information on different types of innovation,  various aspects of the development of an innovation, objectives of innovation activities, sources of information, public funding or expenditure on innovation.  It is aim is to measure the innovativeness of sectors and enable the analysis of the factors of innovation.

 The CIS provides statistics by type of innovators, economic activities and size class of enterprises. The survey is currently carried out every two years across the EU Member States, EFTA countries and EU candidate countries.

In order to ensure comparability across countries, Eurostat together with the countries developed a Harmonised Data Collection (HDC) questionnaire accompanied by a set of definitions and methodological recommendations.

CIS 2018 concepts and its underlying methodology are based on the Oslo Manual (2018) 4th Edition.

New review of the CIS2018  aims to meet several objectives :

1: Reduce subjectivity and biases in the main CIS indicators

2: Improve reporting about innovation activities and capabilities in the firm

3: Ensure international comparability (including compliance with the OM4)

4: Broaden the basis CIS information on enterprise management

5: Take better account the diversity of enterprises in the EU

6: Improve reporting about external drivers and enablers of innovation

7: Improve timeliness

8: Ensure the feasibility of data collection

9: Ensure continuity with the CIS 2016

10: Improve reporting about the output and impact of innovation

CIS2018 is conducted under Commission Regulation No 995/2012. This Regulation defines the mandatory target population of the survey referring to enterprises in the Core NACE economic sectors (see section 3.3.) with at least 10 employees. Further activities may be covered on a voluntary basis in national datasets. Most statistics are based on the 3-year reference period (t, t-1, t-2), but some use only one calendar year (t or t-2).

Please consider CIS t to be the survey that refers to the same year of the quality report and CIS t-2 to be the previous survey e.g.: CIS  2018= CIS t then, CIS t-2=CIS 2016.

 

3.2. Classification system

Indicators related to the enterprises are classified by country, economic activity (NACE Rev. 2), size class of enterprises and type of innovation.

 

The main typology of classification of enterprises in reference to innovation is the distinction between innovation-active enterprises (INN) and not innovation-active enterprises (NINN).

The enterprise is considered as innovative (INN) if during the reference period it successfully introduced a product or business process innovation, had ongoing innovation activities, abandoned innovation activities or was engaged in in-house R&D or R&D contracted out. Non-innovative (NINN) enterprises had no innovation activity mentioned above whatsoever during the reference period.

3.3. Coverage - sector

CIS covers main economic sectors according to NACE Rev.2 broken down by size class of enterprises and type of innovation activity.

3.3.1. Main economic sectors covered - NACE Rev.2

In accordance with Commission Regulation 995/2012 on innovation statistics, the following industries and services are included in the core target population. Results are made available with these following breakdowns :

All NACE – Core NACE (NACE Rev. 2  sections & divisions B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 )

 

CORE INDUSTRY (excluding construction) (NACE Rev. 2 SECTIONS B_C_D_E)

10-12: Manufacture of food products, beverages and tobacco

13-15: Manufacture of textiles, wearing apparel, leather and related products

16-18: Manufacture of wood, paper, printing and reproduction

20: Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products

21: Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations

19-22: Manufacture of petroleum, chemical, pharmaceutical, rubber and plastic products

23: Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products

24: Manufacture of basic metals

25: Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment

26: Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products

25-30: Manufacture of fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), computer, electronic and optical products, electrical equipment, motor vehicles and other transport equipment

31-33: Manufacture of furniture; jewellery, musical instruments, toys; repair and installation of machinery and equipment

 

D: ELECTRICITY, GAS, STEAM AND AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLY

 

E: WATER SUPPLY; SEWERAGE, WASTE MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES

36: Water collection, treatment and supply

37-39: Sewerage, waste management, remediation activities

 

CORE SERVICES (NACE Rev. 2 sections & divisions 46-H-J-K-71-72-73)(NACE code in the tables = G46-M73_INN)

46: Wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles

 

H: TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE

49-51: Land transport and transport via pipelines, water transport and air transport

52-53: Warehousing and support activities for transportation and postal and courier activities

 

J: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION

58: Publishing activities

61: Telecommunications

62: Computer programming, consultancy and related activities

63: Information service activities

 

K: FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES

64: Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding

65: Insurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security

66: Activities auxiliary to financial services and insurance activities

 

M: PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

71: Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis

72: Scientific research and development

73: Advertising and market research

71-73: Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis; Scientific research and development; Advertising and market research

 

3.3.1.1. Main economic sectors covered - NACE Rev.2 - national particularities

The German CIS 2018 also covers the following NACE groups and divisions:

69, 70.2, 74, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82

 

3.3.2. Sector coverage - size class

In accordance with Commission Regulation 995/2012 on innovation statistics, the following size classes of enterprises according to number of employees are included in the core target population of the CIS:

  • 10 - 49 employees
  • 50 - 249 employees
  • 250 or more employees
3.3.2.1. Sector coverage - size class - national particularities

The German CIS 2018 is using 'person employed' as classification unit for size class of enterprises.

The survey also covers enterprises with 5 to 9 employed persons.

The sample of the German CIS 2018 has been stratified by 8 size classes: 5-9, 10-19, 20-49, 50-99, 100-249, 250-499, 500-999, 1000+

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The description of concepts, definitions and main statistical variables is available in CIS 2018 European metadata file (ESMS) Results of the community innovation survey 2018 (CIS2018) (inn_cis11) in Eurostat database.

3.5. Statistical unit

The statistical unit of the German CIS 2018 is the legal unit according to the definition of legal unit in the Business Register of the Statistical Office of the Federal Republic of Germany.

There are some deviations to this rule in case of large, complex enterprises that are active in different NACE divisions. For some of these large, complex enterprises, the statistical unit is the business unit that best matches the activities of the enterprise that fall under a single NACE division.

3.6. Statistical population

Core target population are all enterprises in CORE NACE activities (see 3.3.1) with 10 or more persons employed.

3.7. Reference area

The German CIS 2018 covers all enterprises in the statistical population that are located within the territory of the Federal Republic of Germany.

There is not breakdown of CIS 2018 results by NUTS regions available. The only breakdown available is by Western Germany vs. Eastern Germany.

The microdata nevertheless contain information on the location of an enterprise by NUTS 3-digit level.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Several rounds of Community Innovation Survey have been conducted so far at two-year interval since end of 90’s.

3.8.1. Participation in the CIS waves

 

CIS wave Reference period Participation Comment (deviation from reference period)
CIS2 1994-1996  yes  no
CIS3 1998-2000  yes  no
CIS light 2002-2003*  yes  no
CIS4 2002-2004  yes  no
CIS2006 2004-2006  yes  no
CIS2008 2006-2008  yes  no
CIS2010 2008-2010  yes  no
CIS2012 2010-2012  yes  no
CIS2014 2012-2014  yes  no
CIS2016 2014-2016  yes  no
CIS2018 2016-2018  yes  no

*two reference periods can be distinguished for CIS light: 2000-2002 and 2001-2003

3.9. Base period

Not relevant.


4. Unit of measure Top

CIS indicators are available according to 3 units of measure:

 

NR: Number for number of enterprises and number of persons employed.

THS_EUR: Thousands of euros. All financial variables are provided in thousands of euros, i.e. Turnover or Innovation expenditure.

PC: Percentage. The percentage is the ratio between the selected combinations of indicators.


5. Reference Period Top

For CIS 2018, the time covered by the survey is the 3-year period from the beginning of 2016 to the end of 2018.

Some questions and indicators refer to one year — 2018.

The list of indicators covering the 3-year period and referring to one year according to the HDC is available in the Annex section of the European metadata (ESMS). 


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

CIS surveys are based on the Commission Regulation No 995/2012, implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

This Regulation establishes innovation statistics on a statutory basis and makes the delivery of certain variables compulsory e.g. innovation activities, cooperation, development, expenditures and turnover (see the Regulation). Each survey wave may additionally include further variables. 

In addition, the Regulation defines the obligatory cross-coverage of economic sectors and size class of enterprises.

6.1.1. National legislation

European legislation applies.

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top

CIS data are transmitted to Eurostat via EDAMIS using the secured transmission system.

7.1. Confidentiality - policy

No confidentiality policy.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Does not apply.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

National results of the CIS 2018 were released on February 2nd, 2020 (Indicator Study, see attached pdf "Indikatorenbericht").

At the same time, 47 short innovation reports on individual industries were released (see https://www.zew.de/publikationen/zew-gutachten-und-forschungsberichte/forschungsberichte/innovationen/zew-branchenreport-innovation/, only German version available).

A technical documentation of the CIS 2018 was publised in July 2020 (see https://www.zew.de/publikationen/dokumentation-zur-innvoationserhebung-2019, only German version available).



Annexes:
National report on CIS 2018 results (in German language only)
8.2. Release calendar access

There is no ex-ante release calendar for the German CIS.

8.3. Release policy - user access

All reports on the German CIS 2018 results are available for free to everyone.

Result tables (Excel format) are available on the website of ZEW (German and English versions):

https://www.zew.de/en/publications/zew-expertises-research-reports/research-reports/innovations/mannheim-innovation-panel-the-annual-german-innovation-survey/core-indicators

https://www.zew.de/en/publications/zew-expertises-research-reports/research-reports/innovations/mannheim-innovation-panel-the-annual-german-innovation-survey/focus-indicators


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Differently to the CIS in most other EU member states, the German CIS is conducted every year. Results are therefore published every year. Results of an innovation survey with the reference year t are usually released in January of year t+2.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top

Accessibility and clarity refer to the simplicity and ease for users to access statistics using simple and user-friendly procedure, obtaining them in an expected form and within an acceptable time period, with the appropriate user information and assistance: a global context which finally enables them to make optimum use of the statistics.

10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
Dissemination and access Availability Comments, links, ...
Press release yes, along with the publication of the national report https://www.zew.de/presse/pressearchiv/zew-innovationserhebung-2019-deutsche-wirtschaft-erhoeht-innovationsausgaben
Access to public free of charge  through ZEW website: www.zew.de/innovation  
Access to public restricted (membership/password/part of data provided, etc)  none  
10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

-              Online database (containing all/most results) : https://www.zew.de/en/publications/zew-expertises-research-reports/research-reports/innovations/mannheim-innovation-panel-the-annual-german-innovation-survey

-              Analytical publication (referring to all/most results) : https://www.zew.de/en/publications/dokumentation-zur-innvoationserhebung-2019-1

-              Analytical publication (referring to specific results, e.g. only for one sector or one specific aspect) : https://www.zew.de/en/publikationen/zew-gutachten-und-forschungsberichte/forschungsberichte/innovationen/innovationserhebung/innovationserhebung-akademische-papiere/

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

https://www.zew.de/en/publications/zew-expertises-research-reports/research-reports/innovations/mannheim-innovation-panel-the-annual-german-innovation-survey

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

see 10.4.1.

10.4.1. Dissemination of microdata
Mean of dissemination Availability of microdata Comments, links, ...
Eurostat SAFE centre x  
National SAFE centre x  
Eurostat: partially anonymised data (SUF) x  
National : partially anonymised data x  
10.5. Dissemination format - other

No other means of dissemination.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

The methodology is documented in a separate report: Rammer, Christian (2020), Dokumentation zur Innovationserhebung 2019, ZEW-Dokumentation Nr. 20-01, Mannheim.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

For data collection, data processing and data analysis, the standard quality procedures for enterprise surveys are applied, including double entry of data from paper questionnaires and codes for detecting likely data errors and inconsistencies.

The quality of the German CIS 2018 is assessed to be very good. Owing to the fact that innovation surveys are conducted annually in Germany in the form of a panel survey, enterprises do fully understand the underlying concepts and questions and are prepared to provide the demanded information in high quality, including information on innovation expenditures. The panel nature of the survey furthermore offers the opportunity to cross-check the information provided by enterprises with information from previous years for the same enterprise, which eases the identification of potential errors in the data.

No quality report on the national level has been produced for CIS 2018 in Germany.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

 For data collection, data processing and data analysis, the standard quality procedures for enterprise surveys are applied, including double entry of data from paper questionnaires and codes for detecting likely data errors and inconsistencies.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The quality of the German CIS 2018 is assessed to be very good. Owing to the fact that innovation surveys are conducted annually in Germany in the form of a panel survey, enterprises do fully understand the underlying concepts and questions and are prepared to provide the demanded information in high quality, including information on innovation expenditures. The panel nature of the survey furthermore offers the opportunity to cross-check the information provided by enterprises with information from previous years for the same enterprise, which eases the identification of potential errors in the data.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

User needs are identified through the scientific advisory board of the German CIS. The advisory board includes representatives from academia (universities, research institutes), industry (industry associations), policy (Federal Ministries, Expert Commission on Research and Innovation) as well as from statistical bodies (Federal Statistical Office, organisation that conducts the R&D survey for the enterprise sector).

12.1.1. Needs at national level
User group Short description of user group Main needs for CIS data of the user group Users’ needs
1. Institutions - Federal government Policy officers in Federal Ministries who design and deliver government policies Up-to-date information on innovation activities in the enterprise sector, broken down by size, sector, type of innovation, incl. international comparison
1. Institutions - State governments

Policy officers in Ministries of Federal States who design and deliver state government policies

Up-to-date information on innovation activities in the enterprise sector in the respective Federal State, broken down by size, sector, type of innovation, incl.  comparison to other regions (both national and international)
2. Social actors - Industry associations, unions, other stakeholders Experts in industry association, unions and other stakeholders who are engaged in designing and evaluating innovation policies. Up-to-date information on innovation activities in the relevant industry, broken down by size, type of innovation, incl. international comparison for the same industry
 4. Researchers and students  Researchers at universities and other public research organisations Micro-data, preferable panel data
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

Satisfaction of users of CIS 2018 is assessed to be high based on the number of individuals and users that use tabulated results, reports and micro-data.

12.3. Completeness

There are not specific issues with completeness of the German CIS 2018.

The tabulated results of the German CIS 2018 include all mandatory variables.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not requested.


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

 

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

 

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors for CIS data is the coefficient of variation (CV).

 

Coefficient of Variation= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

Formula:

 

where

13.2.1.1. Coefficient of variations for key variables

Coefficient of variation (%) for key variables by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 and more persons employed

NACE

Size class

(1)

(2)

(3)

Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73)

Total

 62.9%

 98.0%

 140.6%

Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction)

Total

 62.7%

 92.0%

 136.5%

Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73)

Total

 63.1%

 109.8%

 148.5%

 

[1] = Coefficient of variation for the percentage of innovative enterprises (INN) in the total population of enterprises (ENT18)
[2] = Coefficient of variation for the turnover of product innovative enterprises with new or improved products (TUR_PRD_NEW_MKT), as a percentage of total turnover of product innovative enterprises [TUR18,INNO_PRD].
[3] = Coefficient of variation for percentage of product and/or process innovative enterprises (incl. enterprises with abandoned and or on-going activities) involved in any innovation co-operation arrangement [COOP_ALL,INN], as a percentage of innovative enterprises (INN).

13.2.1.2. Variance estimation method

see 13.2.1

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not requested.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under covered groups of the target population

No under covered groups.

13.3.1.4. Coverage errors in coefficient variation

None.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

13.3.2.1. Measures for reducing measurement errors

The main approach to detect measurement errors are comparison of enterprise responses with responses from previous years for each variable. If no such information is available, outliers (based on the mean and standard deviation within a stratum for the respective variable) are identified and analysed.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response occurs when a survey fails to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.                                                                                                 

                                                                                                             

There are two types of non-response:                                                                                                

                                                                                                             

1) Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected about a population unit designated for data collection.                                                                                                                                                                                                       

a) Un-weighted unit non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of units with no response or not usable response) / (Total number of in-scope (eligible) units in the sample)                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

b) Weighted unit non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of weighted units with no response or not usable response) / (Total number of in-scope (eligible) units in the sample)                                                                                                            

                                                                                                             

2) Item non-response, which occurs when only data on some, but not all survey data items are collected about a population unit designated for data collection.                                                                                                                                                                                                   

a) Un-weighted item non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of units with no response at all for the item) / (Total number of eligible, for the item, units in the sample i.e. filters have to be taken into account)    

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

See below.

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted and weighted unit non-response rate by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees

Un-weighted and weighted unit non-response rate by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more persons employed

NACE Number of eligible units with no response  Total number of eligible units in the sample Un-weighted unit non-response rate (%) Weighted unit non-response rate (%)
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73) 10344  19355  53.4  
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction)  6501  12662  51.3  
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73)  3843  6693  57.4  

The number of eligible units is the number of sample units, which indeed belong to the target population.

13.3.3.1.2. Maximum number of recalls/reminders before coding

Up to four reminders were made, combining written, e-mail and telephone reminders.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

See below.

13.3.3.2.1. Item non-response rate for Turnover (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more employees)

Item non-response rate for Turnover (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or persons employed).

  Item non-response rate (un-weighted)  Imputation If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used
Turnover  0.00    
13.3.3.2.2. Item non response rate for new questions

Item non-response rate for new questions in CIS t (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more persons employed)
 

NEW QUESTIONS IN CIS 2018 Inclusion in national questionnaire  Item non response rate (un-weighted) Comments
2.2         Customisation, Co-creation  no    
2.3         Partners in Customisation, Co-creation  no    
2.4         Turnover from Customisation, Co-creation  no    
2.7         Used patents and IRPs  yes  14.7%  
2.8         Buying technical services  no    
2.9         Innovative Purchases  yes  11.6%  
2.10       Using information channels  yes  11.1%  
2.11       Organising work  no    
3.5         Expectations met (product innovation)  yes  10.7%  
3.8         Expectations met (business process innovation)  yes  6.6%  
4.8         Enterprise group: inflows and outflows  no    
4.6         Total expenditure  yes  20,0% to 33.8%  item non-response varies by type of expenditure, lowest for IPR cost, highest for capital expenditure on fixed assets
13.3.4. Processing error

 none

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner.

14.1. Timeliness

The timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between data availability and the event or phenomenon they describe.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Timeliness of national data – date of first release of national level : February 4th, 2020

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not requested.

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Date of transmission of complete and validated data to Eurostat (Number of days between that data and 30 June 2020) : 5 days (succesful data transmission on June 25th), transmission of a corrected version on July 16th, 2020.


15. Coherence and comparability Top

Comparability aims at measuring the impact of differences in applied statistical concepts and definitions on the comparison of statistics between geographical areas, non-geographical domains, or over time.

The coherence of statistical outputs refers to the degree to which the statistical processes by which they were generated used the same concepts (classifications, definitions, and target populations) and harmonised methods. Coherent statistical outputs have the potential to be validly combined and used jointly.

15.1. Comparability - geographical

The same international standards, concepts and definitions (Oslo manual or Eurostat guidelines) have been applied for all geographical areas of Germany.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. National questionnaire – compliance with Eurostat model questionnaire

Methodological deviations from the CIS Harmonised Data Collection (HDC)

Questions not included in national questionnaire compared to HDC Comment
2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.8, 2.11, 4.8, 4.9  questions were not included due to length restriction of national CIS
3.14, 3.18  3.14 was not included because there are no R&D tax incentive scheme in Germany shile corporate taxation in Germany is designed in a way that every enterprise will use tax credits or allowances. 3.18 was included in a different format (other items, other response categories)

 

Changes in the filtering compared to HDC Comment
 none  
   
15.1.3. National questionnaire – additional questions

Methodological deviations from the CIS Harmonised Data Collection (HDC)

Additional questions in national questionnaire (not included in HDC) Comment
Market share, characteristics of the competitive situation, world-first innovations, novelty characteristics of product innovations, impulses from product innovatoin on other innovation activities, cost reduction owing to process innovation, type of software and database activities, use of artificial intelligence, type of design activities, expenditure on personnel, materials, services, energy and other operating costs, amount of fixed capital (property, plant & equipment), profit margin  
 Additional items on 2.5, 2.6, 2.9, 2.10, 3.12, 3.13, 3.17, 4.6  
15.2. Comparability - over time

Due to important methodological changes in CIS 2018 driven by Oslo Manual 2018, the data 2018 cannot be directly compared with previous CIS waves.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not requested.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See the comparison between SBS and CIS data in the section 15.3.3 below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.3.3. Coherence – Structural Business Statistics (SBS)

This part compares key variables for aggregated CIS data with SBS data
Definition of relative difference between CIS and SBS data: DIFF = (SBS/CIS)*100

Comparison between SBS and CIS data (relative difference) by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more persons employed

NACE Size class Number of enterprises (SBS/CIS)* Number of persons employed (SBS/CIS)* Total Turnover (SBS/CIS)*
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  100.5  100.5 92.9
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction) Total  100.5  100.7 100.9
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  100.6  100.1 81.4

* Numbers are to be provided for the last year of the reference period (t)

Comment: Higher total turnover in CIS is due to financial services (NACE K) which is based on CIS definition (gross interest received, gross premium written) while SBS includes only turnover on which VAT is applied.

15.4. Coherence - internal

Not requested.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Confidential information on the production cost of the CIS.


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

See below

18.1.1. Sampling frame (or census frame)

The statistical business register of the German national statistical office (Destatis) is not accessible for third parties for purposes of sampling. Instead, a database of the largest German credit rating agency (CREDITREFORM) was used. This database contains information on virtually all enterprises with more than 5 employees in Germany. This
database is processed by ZEW in order to use it for sampling purposes. The data base contains about 3.3 million economically active enterprises, which corresponds to the number of economically active enterprises reported by Destatis based on the business register.

18.1.2. Sampling design

The German CIS 2016 had a total number of 896 strata (56 NACE divisions, 8 size classes, 2 regions). Random sampling with known and disproportional selection probabilities based on the variance of innovation activities per stratum observed in prior and the number of enterprises in a stratum’s total population was applied.

18.1.3. Target population and sample size
Sample/census indicator Number of enterprises
Target population  147759
Sample  21953
In case of combination sample/census:
Sampled units 18444
Enumerated units/census 3509
Overall sample rate (overall sample/target population)  14.9
18.1.4. Data source for pre-filled variables

Variables and indicators filled or prefilled from other sources.

 

Variables/Indicators Source Reference year
 Age  Mannheim Enterprise Sample  2018
 Turnover, no. of employed persons  Mannheim Enterprise Sample (only in case a firm refused to report the variables)  2018
18.1.5. Data source and variables used for derivation and weighting
Item Response
Data source used for deriving population totals National business register of the German national statistical office (Destatis)
Variables used for weighting  Three different weights are used for qualitative and quantitative variables:
- Weights based on number of enterprises: all qualitative variables
- Weights based on number of employees: innovation expenditure in NACE B to E, number of employees
- Weights based on turnover: innovation expenditure in NACE G, H, J, K, M; turnover with new products, turnover
18.2. Frequency of data collection

According to the Commission Regulation (UE) 995/2012, the innovation statistics shall be provided to Eurostat every two years in each even year. The data collection takes place every second year in year t-2 preceding the data provision.

In Germany, the innovation survey is conducted every year, and national innovation statistics are produced for each calendar year.

18.3. Data collection

See below

18.3.1. Survey participation

Survey is voluntary

18.3.2. Survey type

Stratified random sample survey with a census for enterprises with 500 or more employed persons, combination of paper and online survey.

18.3.3. Combination of sample survey and census data

combination of both sample survey and census.

18.3.4. Census criteria

500 or more employed persons.

18.3.5. Data collection method

Data collection method

Survey method Yes/No Comment
Face-to-face interview  yes  only for a very few, very large enterprises
Telephone interview  yes  for non-response survey
Postal questionnaire  yes  
Electronic questionnaire (format Word or PDF to send back by email)  no  
Web survey (online survey available on the platform via URL)  yes  
Other  no  
18.4. Data validation

Not requested.

18.5. Data compilation

Operations performed on data to derive new information according to a given set of rules.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.

Definition of imputation rate:

Imputation rate (for the variable x) (%) = 100*(Number of replaced values) / (Total number of values for a given variable)

Definition of weighted imputation rate:

Weighted imputation rate= 100*(Number of total weighted replaced values) / (Total number of weighted values for a given variable)

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate for metric variables

Imputation rate for metric variables by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more persons employed:

NACE Size class Total Turnover (1) Turnover from products new to the market (2) R&D expenditure in-house (3)
Unweighted Weighted Unweighted Weighted Unweighted Weighted
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  0  0  17.6  41.3  12.4  9.2
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction) Total  0  0  17.4  35.7  12.8  6.1
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  0  0  18.1  53.9  11.6  23.1

 

(1) = Total turnover in the last year of the reference period (t) (TUR)

(2) = Share of the turnover in the last year of the reference period (t) due to new or improved product new to the market in the total turnover for product innovative enterprises TUR_PRD_NEW_MKT/TUR(INNO_PRD)

(3) = R&D expenditure performed in-house (EXP_INNO_RND_IH)

18.5.2. Weights calculation

Weights calculation method for sample surveys

Method Selected applied method  Comments
Inverse sampling fraction  yes  
Non-respondent adjustments  yes  
Other  no  
18.6. Adjustment

No adjustment was applied to the data.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top