Community innovation survey 2018 (CIS2018) (inn_cis11)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistical Service of Cyprus


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistical Service of Cyprus

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Science and Technology Statistics Unit

1.5. Contact mail address

Statistical Service of Cyprus

CY-1444 Nicosia
Cyprus


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 16/11/2020
2.2. Metadata last posted 16/11/2020
2.3. Metadata last update 16/11/2020


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

The Community Innovation Survey (CIS) is a survey about innovation activities in enterprises. The survey is designed to collect the information on different types of innovation,  various aspects of the development of an innovation, objectives of innovation activities, sources of information, public funding or expenditure on innovation.  It is aim is to measure the innovativeness of sectors and enable the analysis of the factors of innovation.

The CIS provides statistics by type of innovators, economic activities and size class of enterprises. The survey is currently carried out every two years across the EU Member States, EFTA countries and EU candidate countries.

 

In order to ensure comparability across countries, Eurostat together with the countries developed a Harmonised Data Collection (HDC) questionnaire accompanied by a set of definitions and methodological recommendations.

 

CIS 2018 concepts and its underlying methodology are based on the Oslo Manual (2018) 4th Edition

 

New review of the CIS2018  aims to meet several objectives :

1: Reduce subjectivity and biases in the main CIS indicators

2: Improve reporting about innovation activities and capabilities in the firm

3: Ensure international comparability (including compliance with the OM4)

4: Broaden the basis CIS information on enterprise management

5: Take better account the diversity of enterprises in the EU

6: Improve reporting about external drivers and enablers of innovation

7: Improve timeliness

8: Ensure the feasibility of data collection

9: Ensure continuity with the CIS 2016

10: Improve reporting about the output and impact of innovation

 

CIS2018 is conducted under Commission Regulation No 995/2012. This Regulation defines the mandatory target population of the survey referring to enterprises in the Core NACE economic sectors (see section 3.3.) with at least 10 employees. Further activities may be covered on a voluntary basis in national datasets. Most statistics are based on the 3-year reference period (t, t-1, t-2), but some use only one calendar year (t or t-2).

 

Please consider CIS t to be the survey that refers to the same year of the quality report and CIS t-2 to be the previous survey e.g.: CIS  2018= CIS t then, CIS t-2=CIS 2016

3.2. Classification system

Indicators related to the enterprises are classified by country, economic activity (NACE Rev. 2), size class of enterprises and type of innovation.

 

The main typology of classification of enterprises in reference to innovation is the distinction between innovation-active enterprises (INN) and not innovation-active enterprises (NINN).

The enterprise is considered as innovative (INN) if during the reference period it successfully introduced a product or business process innovation, had ongoing innovation activities, abandoned innovation activities or was engaged in in-house R&D or R&D contracted out. Non-innovative (NINN) enterprises had no innovation activity mentioned above whatsoever during the reference period.

3.3. Coverage - sector

CIS covers main economic sectors according to NACE Rev.2 broken down by size class of enterprises and type of innovation activity.

3.3.1. Main economic sectors covered - NACE Rev.2

In accordance with Commission Regulation 995/2012 on innovation statistics, the following industries and services are included in the core target population. Results are made available with these following breakdowns :

All NACE – Core NACE (NACE Rev. 2  sections & divisions B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 )

 

CORE INDUSTRY (excluding construction) (NACE Rev. 2 SECTIONS B_C_D_E)

10-12: Manufacture of food products, beverages and tobacco

13-15: Manufacture of textiles, wearing apparel, leather and related products

16-18: Manufacture of wood, paper, printing and reproduction

20: Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products

21: Manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products and pharmaceutical preparations

19-22: Manufacture of petroleum, chemical, pharmaceutical, rubber and plastic products

23: Manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products

24: Manufacture of basic metals

25: Manufacture of fabricated metal products, except machinery and equipment

26: Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products

25-30: Manufacture of fabricated metal products (except machinery and equipment), computer, electronic and optical products, electrical equipment, motor vehicles and other transport equipment

31-33: Manufacture of furniture; jewellery, musical instruments, toys; repair and installation of machinery and equipment

 

D: ELECTRICITY, GAS, STEAM AND AIR CONDITIONING SUPPLY

 

E: WATER SUPPLY; SEWERAGE, WASTE MANAGEMENT AND REMEDIATION ACTIVITIES

36: Water collection, treatment and supply

37-39: Sewerage, waste management, remediation activities

 

CORE SERVICES (NACE Rev. 2 sections & divisions 46-H-J-K-71-72-73)(NACE code in the tables = G46-M73_INN)

46: Wholesale trade, except of motor vehicles and motorcycles

 

H: TRANSPORTATION AND STORAGE

49-51: Land transport and transport via pipelines, water transport and air transport

52-53: Warehousing and support activities for transportation and postal and courier activities

 

J: INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION

58: Publishing activities

61: Telecommunications

62: Computer programming, consultancy and related activities

63: Information service activities

 

K: FINANCIAL AND INSURANCE ACTIVITIES

64: Financial service activities, except insurance and pension funding

65: Insurance, reinsurance and pension funding, except compulsory social security

66: Activities auxiliary to financial services and insurance activities

 

M: PROFESSIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES

71: Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis

72: Scientific research and development

73: Advertising and market research

71-73: Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis; Scientific research and development; Advertising and market research

 

3.3.1.1. Main economic sectors covered - NACE Rev.2 - national particularities

The entire core target population was covered.  No non-core activities were added

3.3.2. Sector coverage - size class

In accordance with Commission Regulation 995/2012 on innovation statistics, the following size classes of enterprises according to number of employees are included in the core target population of the CIS:

  • 10 - 49 employees
  • 50 - 249 employees
  • 250 or more employees
3.3.2.1. Sector coverage - size class - national particularities

No national particularities.

3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

The description of concepts, definitions and main statistical variables is available in CIS 2018 European metadata file (ESMS) Results of the community innovation survey 2018 (CIS2018) (inn_cis11) in Eurostat database.

3.5. Statistical unit

It is the business enterprise.

3.6. Statistical population

Core target population are all enterprises in CORE NACE activities (see 3.3.1) with 10 or more employees.

3.7. Reference area

All statistical surveys in Cyprus cover all economic activities in the Government controlled area only.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Several rounds of Community Innovation Survey have been conducted so far at two-year interval since end of 90’s.

 

3.8.1. Participation in the CIS waves

 

CIS wave Reference period Participation Comment (deviation from reference period)
CIS2 1994-1996  No  
CIS3 1998-2000  No   
CIS light 2002-2003*  Yes  Reference period 2000-2002
CIS4 2002-2004  Yes  
CIS2006 2004-2006  Yes  
CIS2008 2006-2008  Yes  
CIS2010 2008-2010  Yes  
CIS2012 2010-2012  Yes  
CIS2014 2012-2014  Yes  
CIS2016 2014-2016  Yes  
CIS2018 2016-2018  Yes  

*two reference periods can be distinguished for CIS light: 2000-2002 and 2001-2003

 

3.9. Base period

Not relevant.


4. Unit of measure Top

CIS indicators are available according to 3 units of measure:

 

NR: Number for number of enterprises and number of persons employed.

THS_EUR: Thousands of euros. All financial variables are provided in thousands of euros, i.e. Turnover or Innovation expenditure.

PC: Percentage. The percentage is the ratio between the selected combinations of indicators.


5. Reference Period Top

For CIS 2018, the time covered by the survey is the 3-year period from the beginning of 2016 to the end of 2018.

Some questions and indicators refer to one year — 2018.

The list of indicators covering the 3-year period and referring to one year according to the HDC is available in the Annex section of the European metadata (ESMS). 


6. Institutional Mandate Top

See below.

6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

CIS surveys are based on the Commission Regulation No 995/2012, implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

This Regulation establishes innovation statistics on a statutory basis and makes the delivery of certain variables compulsory e.g. innovation activities, cooperation, development, expenditures and turnover (see the Regulation). Each survey wave may additionally include further variables. 

In addition, the Regulation defines the obligatory cross-coverage of economic sectors and size class of enterprises.

6.1.1. National legislation

CIS surveys are based on the Commission Regulation No 995/2012, implementing Decision No 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

This Regulation establishes innovation statistics on a statutory basis and makes the delivery of certain variables compulsory e.g. innovation activities, cooperation, development, expenditures and turnover. (see the Regulation). Each survey wave may additionally include further variables. 

In addition, the Regulation defines the obligatory cross-coverage of economic sectors and size class of enterprises

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top

CIS data are transmitted to Eurostat via EDAMIS using the secured transmission system.

7.1. Confidentiality - policy

The survey is carried out in accordance with the Statistics Law, No. 15(I) of 2000. The Statistical Service is obliged, under the provisions of the Statistics Law, to treat all the information collected as confidential. All the information collected is used solely for statistical purposes. No data for any individual enterprise is published or disclosed to either public bodies or private individuals. Data which have been gathered from sources which are accessible to the public are not considered as confidential.  All data collected remain confidential, even after the publication of results.

 

All members of staff have legal confidentiality commitments. They are required to take an oath, in accordance with the provisions of the Statistics Law, No. 15(I) of 2000, that they will not disclose information which they have received during the conduct of the survey. This obligation continues to exist after the termination of their professional relationship with the Statistical Service.

 

CIS data are transmitted to Eurostat via EDAMIS using Eurostat's consignment. This safe, secure procedure guarantees a method of tracking transmission. All necessary steps are taken to ensure that the EDAMIS system is working at national level.

 

Official statistics are released in accordance to all confidentiality provisions of the following:

  • National Statistics Law No. 15(I) of 2000 (especially Article 13 on statistical confidentiality).
  • Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2009 on European statistics and its later amendments (especially Chapter 5 on statistical confidentiality).
  • European Statistics Code of Practice (especially Principle 5 on statistical confidentiality).
  • CYSTAT's Code of Practice for the Collection, Publication and Storage of Statistical Data.

 

Links to all of the above documents:

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Under the provisions of the Statistics Law, No. 15(I) of 2000, the statistics published should not allow for the direct or indirect identification of the sampling units. Cells with less than 3 enterprises are flagged as confidential. No dominance rule is applied for primary or secondary confidentiality. Data from sources accessible to the public are not considered as confidential.

 

The treatment of confidential data is regulated by CYSTAT's Code of Practice for the Collection, Publication and Storage of Statistical Data.

 

Links to the documents mentioned:


8. Release policy Top

See below.

8.1. Release calendar

Not applicable. No specific release policy or release calendar for the data set in question (CIS) exists.

8.2. Release calendar access

Not applicable. No specific release calendar for the data set in question (CIS) exists.

8.3. Release policy - user access

According to the Dissemination and Pricing Policy of the Statistical Service of Cyprus (section 2.3) CYSTAT΄s main channel for dissemination of statistics is the website, which offers the same conditions to everyone and is updated at the same time every working day (12:00 noon). Privileged pre-released access (of no more than 1 day in advance) has been granted to a few selected users for specific statistics. These are specified in the Dissemination Policy (section 2.3).

 

In addition to the annual release calendar, users are informed of the various statistical releases through the “Alert” service provided by CYSTAT.

 

Link to the Dissemination and Pricing Policy should be attached (or the actual document):

  • Dissemination and Pricing Policy of the Statistical Service of Cyprus:

http://www.mof.gov.cy/mof/cystat/statistics.nsf/dissemination_en/dissemination_en?OpenDocument


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

CIS is conducted and disseminated at two-year interval in pair years.


10. Accessibility and clarity Top

Accessibility and clarity refer to the simplicity and ease for users to access statistics using simple and user-friendly procedure, obtaining them in an expected form and within an acceptable time period, with the appropriate user information and assistance: a global context which finally enables them to make optimum use of the statistics.

10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below 10.1.1.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
Dissemination and access Availability Comments, links, ...
Press release  Yes  
Access to public free of charge   Yes  
Access to public restricted (membership/password/part of data provided, etc)  No  

 

 

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

-              Online database (containing all/most results) : No

-              Analytical publication (referring to all/most results) : General paper and online publications with key data included in the statistical yearbook entitled “Statistical Abstract” and in other multi-domain publications such as the pocketbook “Cyprus in Figures”

-              Analytical publication (referring to specific results, e.g. only for one sector or one specific aspect) : No

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

No online database exists.

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below

10.4.1. Dissemination of microdata
Mean of dissemination Availability of microdata Comments, links, ...
Eurostat SAFE centre  No  
National SAFE centre  No  
Eurostat: partially anonymised data (SUF)  No  
National : partially anonymised data  Yes  

 

Statistical micro-data from CYSTAT’s surveys are accessible for research purposes only and under strict provisions as described below:

Under the provisions of the Statistics Law, CYSTAT may release microdata for the sole use of scientific research.

Applicants have to submit the request form "APPLICATION FOR DATA FOR RESEARCH PURPOSES" giving thorough information on the project for which micro-data are needed.

The application is evaluated by CYSTAT’s Confidentiality Committee and if the application is approved, a charge is fixed according to the volume and time consumed for preparation of the data. Micro-data may then be released after an anonymisation process which ensures no direct identification of the statistical units but, at the same time, ensures usability of the data. The link for the application is attached below.

Link to the application for access to microdata on CYSTAT's website: http://www.cystat.gov.cy/mof/cystat/statistics.nsf/dissemination_en/dissemination_en?OpenDocument

10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.6. Documentation on methodology

Each data file loaded on the web site is accompanied by a press release and a comprehensive methodological note, giving information on the innovation survey and its scope, the concepts and definitions used, as well as assistance on how to interpret the tables published.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

Users can download free of charge from the web site of the Statistical Service of Cyprus the key results (as MS Excel files) of the various rounds of innovation surveys carried out in Cyprus. Each data file is accompanied by a press release and a comprehensive methodological note, giving information on the surveys and their scope, concepts and definitions, as well as assistance on how to interpret the tables published. For any further information, users can address a request to the Statistical Service (by phone, mail, e-mail or via the enquiries facility on the web site). Users seem to be fully satisfied.


11. Quality management Top

See below.

11.1. Quality assurance

The quality of statistics in CYSTAT is managed in the framework of the European Statistics Code of Practice which sets the standards for developing, producing and disseminating European Statistics as well as the ESS Quality Assurance Framework (QAF). CYSTAT endorses the Quality Declaration of the European Statistical System. In addition, CYSTAT is guided by the requirements provided for in Article 12 of the Statistics Law No. 15(I) of 2000 as well as Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 223/2009 on European statistics, which sets out the quality criteria to be applied in the development, production and dissemination of European statistics.

 

Links to all of the above documents:

11.2. Quality management - assessment

The CIS 2018 carried out in Cyprus is assessed to have reached high levels of quality. To this effect, the mandatory nature of the survey (in accordance with the provisions of the national Statistics Law, No 15(I) of 2000) and the practice of carrying out face to face interviews at the enterprises premises played a vital and decisive role.

The CIS2018 survey has been the third CIS (the first was CIS2014) to implement the Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) method.  A specially developed BLAISE programme (enumerators version) was used for this survey for data entry and most consistency tests. Controls and consistency checks were included in the BLAISE programme in order to identify possible errors. Also, help screens and warning messages for data entry errors, internal inconsistencies or quality errors are provided by the programme, minimizing the possibility of having any such errors.

All enumerators employed attended a comprehensive training session, during which the questionnaire, the BLAISE program and the concepts involved were thoroughly explained, examples on what qualified as innovation were given and problems expected to be encountered in the field were identified. Consequently, they were skilled enough to properly guide the respondents through the questionnaire, to clarify concepts and definitions and to make sure that the possibility of having internal inconsistencies or quality errors in the questionnaires is kept to a minimum.

The use of skilled enumerators is the usual practice with all business surveys in Cyprus, resulting in extremely high unit response rates and negligible item nonresponse, thus rendering the conduct of a non-response analysis as unnecessary.

The electronically completed questionnaires were checked again in the office with the specially developed for this survey BLAISE programme (supervisors version). This included additional quality checking and correcting for any remaining logical inconsistencies, comparing with the responses provided by the same unit in the previous CIS 2016, consulting the respective structural business and R&D questionnaires, etc. Data analysis and processing was done using MS Excel spreadsheets. Additional controls and validation checks were included in order to identify any remaining errors.

The Eurostat methodological guidelines and recommendations and the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 995/2012 on innovation statistics were respected.


12. Relevance Top

Relevance is the degree to which statistics meet current and potential users’ needs. It includes the production of all needed statistics and the extent to which concepts used (definitions, classifications etc.) reflect user needs. The aim is to describe the extent to which the statistics are useful to, and used by, the broadest array of users. For this purpose, statisticians need to compile information, firstly about their users and their needs.

The CIS is based on a common questionnaire and a common survey methodology in order to achieve comparable, harmonised and high quality results for EU Member States, EFTA countries, Candidates and Associated countries.

12.1. Relevance - User Needs

There is no involvement of users at national level in the final national questionnaire design. The questionnaire used at national level corresponds fully to the core questionnaire agreed at European level. For the time being, no unmet users’ needs at national level have come to our attention and thus no specific actions are planned to satisfy such needs.

12.1.1. Needs at national level

 

User group Short description of user group Main needs for CIS data of the user group Users’ needs
1. Institutions - European level  The European Commission (DG ENTR)  Innovation Union Scoreboard
1. Institutions - National level  Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Energy, Commerce and Industry, Directorate General for European Programmes, Coordination and Development, Research and Innovation Foundation  Strategic programming, economic analysis and monitoring of national research policies and of the national Lisbon (Europe 2020) strategy programme
2. Social actors  Cyprus Chamber of Commerce and Industry, various employers’ associations, trade unions and lobby groups  Economic analysis and monitoring, interested both in figures and comments
3. Media  Economic and financial newspapers and web pages, TV channels  Interested in figures, comments and analyses
4. Researchers and students Higher education institutions, researchers, students, private individuals Interested in figures, comments and analyses and access to micro data for research purposes
5. Enterprises or businesses Business enterprises, consultancy offices Market analysis, marketing strategy, offering consultancy services
12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

In the latest national user satisfaction survey, innovation statistics were listed down explicitly as one of the main statistical fields to be commented on. However, the number of questionnaires with relevant comments was extremely limited and does not allow for adequate conclusions to be made. No specific problems were reported.

 

Since 2008 (with the exception of 2010 and 2013) CYSTAT carries out an annual online “Users Satisfaction Survey”.

Overall, the users of statistical data published by CYSTAT are satisfied.

 

12.3. Completeness

The national standard CIS 2018 output tabulation is complete; there exist no missing cells, either compulsory or voluntary (for voluntary questions covered in national questionnaire).

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not requested.


13. Accuracy Top

See below.

13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

13.2. Sampling error

That part of the difference between a population value and an estimate thereof, derived from a random sample, which is due to the fact that only a subset of the population is enumerated.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

The main indicator used to measure sampling errors for CIS data is the coefficient of variation (CV).

 

Coefficient of Variation= (Square root of the estimate of the sampling variance) / (Estimated value)

Formula:

 

where

13.2.1.1. Coefficient of variations for key variables

Coefficient of variation (%) for key variables by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 and more employees

NACE

Size class

(1)

(2)

(3)

Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73)

Total

 1.317

1.234 1.361

Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction)

Total

 1.291

 1.465

 1.527

Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73)

Total

 1.332

 1.113

 1.266

 

[1] = Coefficient of variation for the percentage of innovative enterprises (INN) in the total population of enterprises (ENT18)
[2] = Coefficient of variation for the turnover of product innovative enterprises with new or improved products (TUR_PRD_NEW_MKT), as a percentage of total turnover of product innovative enterprises [TUR18,INNO_PRD].
[3] = Coefficient of variation for percentage of product and/or process innovative enterprises (incl. enterprises with abandoned and or on-going activities) involved in any innovation co-operation arrangement [COOP_ALL,INN], as a percentage of innovative enterprises (INN).

13.2.1.2. Variance estimation method

The variance was calculated using the formula given in section 13.2.1. Sample design and weighting were taken into account.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors (or frame errors) are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not requested.

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.1.3. Under covered groups of the target population

No coverage or frame errors exist.

13.3.1.4. Coverage errors in coefficient variation

Not applicable. No coverage or frame errors exist.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values, or there may be respondent or interviewer bias.

13.3.2.1. Measures for reducing measurement errors

No measurement errors have been identified.

 

The CIS2018 survey has been the third CIS (the first was CIS2014) to implement the Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) method.  A specially developed BLAISE programme (enumerator’s version) was used for this survey for data entry and most consistency tests. Controls and consistency checks were included in the BLAISE programme in order to identify possible errors. Also, help screens and warning messages for data entry errors, internal inconsistencies or quality errors are provided by the programme, minimizing the possibility of having any such errors.

All enumerators employed attended a comprehensive training session, during which the questionnaire, the BLAISE program and the concepts involved were thoroughly explained, examples on what qualified as innovation were given and problems expected to be encountered in the field were identified. Consequently, they were skilled enough to properly guide the respondents through the questionnaire, to clarify concepts and definitions and to make sure that the possibility of having internal inconsistencies or quality errors in the questionnaires is kept to a minimum.

The use of skilled enumerators is the usual practice with all business surveys in Cyprus.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response occurs when a survey fails to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

There are two types of non-response:

1) Unit non-response, which occurs when no data (or so little as to be unusable) are collected about a population unit designated for data collection.

a) Un-weighted unit non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of units with no response or not usable response) / (Total number of in-scope (eligible) units in the sample)

b) Weighted unit non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of weighted units with no response or not usable response) / (Total number of in-scope (eligible) units in the sample)

2) Item non-response, which occurs when only data on some, but not all survey data items are collected about a population unit designated for data collection.

a) Un-weighted item non-response rate (%) = 100*(Number of units with no response at all for the item) / (Total number of eligible, for the item, units in the sample i.e. filters have to be taken into account)

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

See below.

13.3.3.1.1. Un-weighted and weighted unit non-response rate by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees

Un-weighted and weighted unit non-response rate by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees

NACE Number of eligible units with no response  Total number of eligible units in the sample Un-weighted unit non-response rate (%) Weighted unit non-response rate (%)
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73)  0  2044  0%  0%
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction)  0  685  0%  0%
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73)  0  1359  0%  0%

The number of eligible units is the number of sample units, which indeed belong to the target population.

13.3.3.1.2. Maximum number of recalls/reminders before coding

Not applicable. There exists no unit non-response.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

See below.

13.3.3.2.1. Item non-response rate for Turnover (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more employees)

Item non-response rate for Turnover (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more employees).

  Item non-response rate (un-weighted)  Imputation If imputed, describe method used, mentioning which auxiliary information or stratification is used
Turnover  0 No  

 

Comment: No imputation for turnover. Information from Structural Business and R&D surveys were used.

13.3.3.2.2. Item non response rate for new questions

Item non-response rate for new questions in CIS t (in Core NACE: B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73 enterprises with 10 or more employees)
 

NEW QUESTIONS IN CIS 2018 Inclusion in national questionnaire  Item non response rate (un-weighted) Comments
2.2         Customisation, Co-creation  No    Not applicable
2.3         Partners in Customisation, Co-creation  No    Not applicable
2.4         Turnover from Customisation, Co-creation  No    Not applicable
2.7         Used patents and IRPs  No    Not applicable
2.8         Buying technical services  No    Not applicable
2.9         Innovative Purchases  Yes  0%  
2.10       Using information channels  No    Not applicable
2.11       Organising work  No    Not applicable
3.5         Expectations met (product innovation)  No    Not applicable
3.8         Expectations met (business process innovation)  No    Not applicable
4.8         Enterprise group: inflows and outflows  No    Not applicable
4.6         Total expenditure  No    Not applicable

 

 

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis on the base of the statistics produced, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies in the data which usually represent errors.

13.3.4.1. Data entry method

Data collection was carried out by face to face interviewing at the enterprises’ premises, using the Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) method.  For data entry and editing, the BLAISE program was used. Data were exported in MS Excel for further checks, analyses and tabulations.

13.3.4.2. Editing process and method

During the face to face interview, respondents were instructed on what qualifies as innovation and were guided in completing the questionnaire in the best possible way thus ensuring that item non response was kept to a minimum. Using the Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) method all electronically completed questionnaires were thoroughly checked by controls and validation checks and corrected for any logical inconsistencies by the BLAISE data entry and editing programme. If required, respondents were contacted again over the phone. For the basic economic information (turnover and employment), auxiliary sources (such as the structural business and R&D surveys) were used.

For data analysis and processing, data from BLAISE were exported to MS Excel spreadsheets. Additional controls and validation checks were included in order to eliminate any remaining errors.

13.3.4.3. Coding errors

No coding errors have been identified.

13.3.4.4. Effect of processing errors in the coefficient of variation

The CVs reported in section 13.2.1 incorporate the effects of any processing errors.

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Not requested.


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner.

14.1. Timeliness

The timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between data availability and the event or phenomenon they describe.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Timeliness of national data – date of first release of national level : December 2020

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Not requested.

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Date of transmission of complete and validated data to Eurostat (Number of days between that date and 30 June 2020) -1

Data provided on 29 June 2020.


15. Coherence and comparability Top

Comparability aims at measuring the impact of differences in applied statistical concepts and definitions on the comparison of statistics between geographical areas, non-geographical domains, or over time.

The coherence of statistical outputs refers to the degree to which the statistical processes by which they were generated used the same concepts (classifications, definitions, and target populations) and harmonised methods. Coherent statistical outputs have the potential to be validly combined and used jointly.

15.1. Comparability - geographical

This part focuses on reporting the deviations from the harmonised CIS questionnaire (see below).

Cypus followed the same international standards, concepts and definitions (Oslo manual and Eurostat guidelines) at the whole territory and there is not discrepancy at national level and in comparison to remaining EU countries.

Cyprus is one area in all NUTS levels.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. National questionnaire – compliance with Eurostat model questionnaire

Methodological deviations from the CIS Harmonised Data Collection (HDC)

The EU-harmonised core version of the questionnaire was used in full, with no deviations. All compulsory questions were included.

Non-mandatory HDC question(s) (voluntary questions) that Cyprus drop in the CIS 2018 national questionnaire are:

From Section 2 : Strategies and Knowledge Flows, the following questions and parameters:

Questions 2.2 to 2.4 (CONC  and  CONC_USR   and CONC_TUR_PRD)

Questions 2.7 and 2.8 (IPR_IN  and   PUR_TSERV)

Questions 2.10 and 2.11 (CKNO  and MORG)

 

From Section 3: Innovation, the following questions and parameters:

Question 3.5 (EXPEC_INNO_PRD)

Question 3.8 (EXPCT_INNO_PCS)

Question 3.10 (the last 3 non-mandatory parameters EXP_INNO_INN_XRND_OWN_PER and EXP_INNO_INN_XRND_SMSP and EXP_INNO_INN_XRND_CGO)

Question 3.11 (all the parameters for 2020 compared to 2019)

Question 3.17 (LEG)

 

From Section 4: Basic information on your enterprise, the following questions and parameters:

Question 4.2 [EMPUD]

All questions from 4.4 to 4.9

 

Changes in the filtering compared to HDC Comment
Not applicable. The EU-harmonised core version of the questionnaire was used in full, with no deviations.

 

 

15.1.3. National questionnaire – additional questions

Methodological deviations from the CIS Harmonised Data Collection (HDC)

Additional questions in national questionnaire (not included in HDC) Comment
 No No extra questions to serve national needs were added to the EU-harmonised core version of the questionnaire.

 

 

15.2. Comparability - over time

Due to important methodological changes in CIS 2018 driven by Oslo Manual 2018, the data 2018 cannot be directly compared with previous CIS waves.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

Not requested.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

See the comparison between SBS and CIS data in the section 15.3.3 below.

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.3.3. Coherence – Structural Business Statistics (SBS)

This part compares key variables for aggregated CIS data with SBS data
Definition of relative difference between CIS and SBS data: DIFF = (SBS/CIS)*100

Comparison between SBS and CIS data (relative difference) by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees

NACE Size class Number of enterprises (SBS/CIS)* Number of employees (SBS/CIS)* Total Turnover (SBS/CIS)*
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  97.4 98 99.3
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction) Total  97.7  99.5  100.9
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  97.2  97.1  98.7

* Numbers are to be provided for the last year of the reference period (t)

Comment

- NACE divisions 64-66 were excluded from the calculations of relative difference between SBS and CIS 2018 data, since they are  not covered in the national SBS survey.

- Part of the differences may be explained by the different definition of the “enterprise” between SBS and CIS.

15.4. Coherence - internal

Not requested.


16. Cost and Burden Top

Confidential information on the production cost of the CIS.


17. Data revision Top

See below.

17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top

See below.

18.1. Source data

See below.

18.1.1. Sampling frame (or census frame)

The official, up-to-date, statistical business register was used.

18.1.2. Sampling design

The Eurostat guidelines and recommendations regarding sample design were followed.  A census of enterprises with 20 or more employees was taken for all NACE activities while for the size class 10-19 a sample was drawn. The sample was drawn on the basis of the economic activity (at the NACE Rev. 2 three-digit level) and the enterprise size (according to the number of employees).  The selection of the sample within each stratum was done by simple random sampling without replacement, with known selection probabilities.

18.1.3. Target population and sample size
Sample/census indicator Number of enterprises
Target population  2044
Sample  1465
In case of combination sample/census:
Sampled units  634
Enumerated units/census  831
Overall sample rate (overall sample/target population)  71.67% (1465/2044)

 

 

18.1.4. Data source for pre-filled variables

 Variables and indicators filled or prefilled from other sources.

 

Variables/Indicators Source Reference year
 Total Employment 2018  Short Business Statistics (SBS) survey  2018
 Total Turnover 2018
 Short Business Statistics (SBS) survey  2018

 

 

18.1.5. Data source and variables used for derivation and weighting

 

Item Response
Data source used for deriving population totals  The national statistical business register was used.
Variables used for weighting  The number of employees and economic activity (at the NACE Rev. 2 three-digit level).

 

 

18.2. Frequency of data collection

According to the Commission Regulation (UE) 995/2012, the innovation statistics shall be provided to Eurostat every two years in each even year. The data collection takes place every second year in year t-2 preceding the data provision.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Survey participation

The survey was mandatory, in accordance with the provisions of the national Statistics Law, No. 15(I) of 2000.

18.3.2. Survey type

A combination of a census and a sample survey was used.

18.3.3. Combination of sample survey and census data

For all NACE Rev. 2 activities, complete enumeration (census) of enterprises with 20 or more employees was taken. Enterprises in the size class 10-19 employees were selected by sampling.

18.3.4. Census criteria

The only criterion used to distinguish whether a census or a sample would be conducted was size class: a census was conducted in enterprises with 20 or more employees for all NACE activities.

 

18.3.5. Data collection method

Data collection method

Survey method Yes/No Comment
Face-to-face interview Yes  For the vast majority of cases (more than 90% of cases - before Covid19 conditions)
Telephone interview  Yes  Less than 3% of cases (due to Covid19 conditions)
Postal questionnaire  Yes  Less than 3% of cases (due to Covid19 conditions)
Electronic questionnaire (format Word or PDF to send back by email)  Yes  Less than 5% of cases (due to Covid19 conditions)
Web survey (online survey available on the platform via URL)  No  
Other  Not applicable  

Comment: Data collection was carried out by face-to-face interviewing at the enterprises’ premises; this is the usual practice with all business surveys in Cyprus. The interview was computer assisted. Persons interviewed normally comprised high level executives of the enterprise, such as the director-general, production and/or quality manager, R&D manager, finance director, etc.

18.4. Data validation

Not requested.

18.5. Data compilation

Operations performed on data to derive new information according to a given set of rules.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.

Definition of imputation rate:

Imputation rate (for the variable x) (%) = 100*(Number of replaced values) / (Total number of values for a given variable)

Definition of weighted imputation rate:

Weighted imputation rate= 100*(Number of total weighted replaced values) / (Total number of weighted values for a given variable)

18.5.1.1. Imputation rate for metric variables

Imputation rate for metric variables by NACE categories and for enterprises with 10 or more employees:

NACE Size class Total Turnover (1) Turnover from products new to the market (2) R&D expenditure in-house (3)
Unweighted Weighted Unweighted Weighted Unweighted Weighted
Core NACE (B-C-D-E-46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  0  0  0  0  0  0
Core industry (B_C_D_E - excluding construction) Total  0  0  0  0  0  0
Core Services (46-H-J-K-71-72-73) Total  0  0  0  0  0  0

 

(1) = Total turnover in the last year of the reference period (t) (TUR)

(2) = Share of the turnover in the last year of the reference period (t) due to new or improved product new to the market in the total turnover for product innovative enterprises TUR_PRD_NEW_MKT/TUR(INNO_PRD)

(3) = R&D expenditure performed in-house (EXP_INNO_RND_IH)

18.5.2. Weights calculation

Weights calculation method for sample surveys

Method Selected applied method  Comments
Inverse sampling fraction  Yes  

The Eurostat guidelines and recommendations regarding the calculation of weights were followed. The inverse of the sampling fraction (using the number of employees) was used to adjust for different probabilities of selection in the sampling process. Only one set of weights was used.

Non-respondent adjustments    
Other    

 

 

18.6. Adjustment

No non-response analysis was deemed necessary, as the survey had resulted in extremely high response rates. There was no need for adjustment/calibration of the weights.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top
CIS2018 Cyprus Questionnaire (Greek version)
CIS2018 Cyprus Questionnaire (English version)