Government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) (gba)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Ministry for Higher Education, and Research (MESR)


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Ministry for Higher Education, and Research (MESR)

1.2. Contact organisation unit

SIES - Sub-Directorate for Information Systems and Statistical Studies

Department of statistical studies on research

1.5. Contact mail address

Ministère de l’enseignement supérieur et de la recherche
DGESIP/DGRI – SIES – Département des études statistiques de la recherche
1 rue Descartes, 75231 Paris Cedex 05


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 29/11/2023
2.2. Metadata last posted 29/11/2023
2.3. Metadata last update 29/11/2023


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Government Budget Allocations for R&D (GBARD) measure government support to research and experimental development (R&D) activities, and thereby provide information about the priority governments give to different public R&D funding activities. This type of funder-based approach for reporting R&D involves identifying all the budget items that may support R&D activities and measuring or estimating their R&D content (FM 2015, Chapter 12).

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics. Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. 

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020.

The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (europa.eu)).

Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 1197/2020, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

3.2. Classification system

Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) is based on the Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS) at one digit level.

3.2.1. National classification
National nomenclature of SEO used It is not exactly the NABS classification which is used; more specifically, the classification for the survey on socio economic objectives is very broadly based on NABS level 1. 
Correspondence table with NABS We have such a table. It is a consolidation between thiese two classifications.
3.2.2. NABS classification
Deviations from NABS  We try to stay as close as possible to the NABS. The deviations cannot be measured. 
Problems in identifying / separating NABS chapters and sub chapters

 No.

Ability to distribute Non-oriented research and General University Funds (GUF) by fields of R&D   Non-oriented research might be broken down by major scientific disciplines, but this is not possible for GUF, again because of the problem of shifting between a breakdown of staff by discipline and by budgetary cost. 
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  The definition used for R&D is the definition in the Frascati Manual. 
Coverage of R&D or S&T in general  GBARD statistics cover R&D 
Fields of R&D (FORD) covered  NSE+SSH. 
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  Exploration and exploitation of the Earth,Environment, Exploration and exploitation of space, Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures, Energy, Industrial production and technology, Health, Agriculture, Education, Culture, recreation, religion and mass media, Political and social systems, structures and processes, General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from general university funds, General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from sources other than GUF, Defence
3.3.2. Definition and coverage of government

GBARD statistics are assumed to report detailed data on all the government's budget items that may support R&D activities and to measure or estimate their R&D content. For the purposes of GBARD, the Government sector comprises (a) the central (federal) government, (b) regional (state) government and (c) local (municipal) government subsectors (FM2015, Chapter 12).

 

Levels of government Definition Included / Not included Comments
Central (federal) government  The Ministry in charge of research and higher education, other central government bodies, public research institutes and several medical research foundations are included in the definition. This is justified by the fact that they are funded from the civilian R&D budget.   Included  
Regional (state) government  Not applicable  Not included  
Local (municipal) government Is defined as territorial collectivities (regions, departments, community of communes, communes).  Not included  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not requested.

3.5. Statistical unit

Government bodies.

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units, which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Definition of the national target population  All gouvernment bodies allocating R&D.
Estimation of the target population size  70
3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested.


4. Unit of measure Top

Not requested.


5. Reference Period Top

Calendar year: january-december

 

 


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

GBARD statistics are based on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) Regulation (EU) No 995/2012 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology until the end of 2020. 

Since the beginning of 2021, GBARD statistics are based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020.  The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail. Please note that according to Article 12(4) of Regulation (EU) 2020/1197, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 995/2012 continue to apply for the reference years that fall before 1 January 2021.

6.1.2. National legislation

Not applicable.

6.1.3. Standards and manuals

Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law:

Not applicable.

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff:

Not applicable.

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

No restriction on broadcasting.


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

July N

8.2. Release calendar access

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/calendrier-2023-des-publications-statistiques-du-sies-46592

 

8.3. Release policy - user access

Official calendar

Publications

Press releases

Users are treated according to the national statistical system rules, i.e. all users have access to the information at the same time.

 


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Yearly


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  Y

  https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/les-credits-budgetaires-pour-la-recherche-de-la-mires-en-2023-92625

Ad-hoc releases  Y  

https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/eesr/FR/EESR16_R_46/les_objectifs_socio_economiques_des_credits_budgetaires_consacres_a_la_recherche/

 Jaune budgétaire (Rapport sur les politiques nationales de recherche et de formations supérieures) : https://www.budget.gouv.fr/documentation/documents-budgetaires/exercice-2024/le-projet-de-loi-de-finances-et-les-documents-annexes-pour-2024/jaunes-budgetaires-2024

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

 Y

 https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/les-credits-budgetaires-pour-la-recherche-de-la-mires-en-2023-92625

Specific paper publication

(paper, online)

 Y

 https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/eesr/FR/EESR16_R_46/les_objectifs_socio_economiques_des_credits_budgetaires_consacres_a_la_recherche/

 Jaune budgétaire (Rapport sur les politiques nationales de recherche et de formations supérieures) : https://www.budget.gouv.fr/documentation/documents-budgetaires/exercice-2024/le-projet-de-loi-de-finances-et-les-documents-annexes-pour-2024/jaunes-budgetaires-2024

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

https://data.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/explore/dataset/fr-esr-publications-statistiques/information/

 

10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  No
Access cost policy  Free
Micro-data anonymisation rules  Not applicable
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y  Agregate figures  ministry website : https://publication.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/FR/
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  Y  Micro-data / Aggregate figures  Specific requests from government bodies (inspections, Cour des comptes) and Insee
Other N    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/enquete-sur-les-objectifs-socio-economiques-des-credits-budgetaires-destines-la-rd-81712

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, etc.)  Metadata
Request on further clarification  Specificals requests from government bodies.
Measure to increase clarity  Metadata are updated every year.
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data  Good impression.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

Not applicable

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Not applicable


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  OCDE - MSTI  database
 1  Ministries : R&D, Agriculture, Industry, Environement, Defense  National data
 3  Media Disseminated data
 6  Cour des comptes, inspections générales de l'adminisatration, des finances ou de l'éducation nationale  Specific questions

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  No
User satisfaction survey specific for GBARD statistics  No
Short description of the feedback received  Each year, the ministries and organisms surveyed receive a link to the Ministry's website with the publications and the main results of the survey. They are able to give back their feedback.
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

100%

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells
Provisional budget statistics1 X          
Obligatory final budget statistics1 X          
Optional final budget statistics2          

1)  Criteria: Obligatory data (provisional budget and final budget). Only 'Very Good' = 100% and 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

2)  Criteria: Optional data (final budget). 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%;'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability – Provisional data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD  Y  Yearly

 None

 T  
NABS Chapter level   Yearly  None  T  
NABS Sub-chapter level  Y   Yearly None   T  
Special categories - Biotech  Yearly   None  T  
Special categories - Nanotech  Y  Yearly   None  T  
Special categories - Security   Yearly  None  T  

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.2. Data availability – Final data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD  Y

 Yearly

 None  T  
NABS Chapter level  Y   Yearly   None  T  
NABS Sub-chapter level  Y   Yearly   None  T  
Special categories - Biotech  Y   Yearly  None   T  
Special categories - Nanotech   Yearly   None  T  
Special categories - Security  Y   Yearly   None  T  

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.3. Data availability – Other special categories
Special categories Stage1 Availability1 Frequency of data colletion Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)3 Comments
 None            
             
             
             
             
             

1) Stage: P - provisional, F - final. 

2) Availability of the data: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

3) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
   - -  -  1  -  -

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5) In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for GBARD.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy
 Indicators 5 (Very Good)1 4 (Good)2 3 (Satisfactory)3 2 (Poor)4 1 (Very poor)5
 GBARD  X        
National public funding to transnationally coordinated R & D        X  

1) High level of coverage (At least all national or federal ministries and the ministries and agencies responsible for R&D funding at state or regional level). High rate of response (>90%) in data collection. All figures broken down by NABS.  

2) If at least one out of the three criteria described above would not be fully met.

3) In the event that the rate of response would be lower than 80% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 70% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) If all the three criteria described above are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

Not requested.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not requested.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors:

 Not applicable

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 Not applicable

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Magnitude of error (%) = (Observed Value-True Value)/ True Value (%) 

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors:

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response errors: occur when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

 

a) Problems in obtaining data from targeted information providers:

A few public bodies don't answer the questionary.

b) Measures taken to reduce their effect:

The general director for research and innovation ask them to response.

c) Effect of non-response errors on the produced statistics:

 If non response, we estimate the data with the previous year response.

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

 

a)       Data processing and editing processes:

 Not applicable

b)      Description of errors:

 Not applicable

c)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

Not applicable

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Model assumption errors occur when the assumptions made for the estimation of parameters, models, the testing of statistical hypotheses, etc., are violated. As a result, the quality of the resulting statistics is affected (e.g. degrees of confidence might be inflated).

Description/assessment: 

Not applicable


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Date of first release of national data: 

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Date of first release of national data: September

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 6 12
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  6  12
Delay (days)   0  0
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Regulation No 2020/1197, Frascati manual and the EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issue Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Research and development FM2015 Chapter 2 (mainly paragraphs 2.3 and 2.4).

 No

 
Coverage of levels of government FM2015, §12.5 to 12.9  No  No local data
Socioeconomic objectives coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20  No  Since 2010, the Defense objective has been subdivided between Defense and Global Security:

1) Defense and defense strategies, science, technology and arms economies

2) Internal security, civil security, economic security

Reference period Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20   No  
15.1.3. Deviations from recommendations

GBARD encompass all spending allocations met from sources of government revenue foreseen within the budget, such as taxation. Spending allocations by extra-budgetary government entities are within the scope only to the extent that their funds are allocated through the budgetary process (FM2015 §12.9). The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national GBARD statistics.

 

Methodological issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations  National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Definition of GBARD FM § 12.9  N GBARD covers the civilian R&D budget (with a few adjustments), appropriations for higher education research and for the R&D appropriations of the Defense's Ministry. 
Stages of data collection FM2015 §12.41  N  Budget appropriations before Parliament vote. There is no new investigation at the end of the budget year
Gross / net approach, net principle FM2015 §12.20 and 12.21  N   Resources from other sectors are not included.
EU/other funds Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics  N  EU funds are not included. Similarly, France’s participation in funding the R&D Framework Programme is not included in these budget appropriations, although it is included in calculating national R&D expenditure. 
Types of expenditure FM2015 §12.15 to 12.18  N  
Current and capital expenditure FM §12.15  N   Both current and capital expenditure are included in GBARD.
Extra budgetary funds FM §12.8, 12.20, 12.38  N  Extra budgetary funds are not included. Only resources included in the State budget are taken into account.
Loans FM §12.31, 12.32, 12.34  N   No distinction is made in the treatment of non-repayable and repayable subsidies. 
Indirect funding, tax rebates, etc. FM §12.31 - 12.38  N   Tax credits are not included.
Treatment of multi-annual projects FM2015 §12.44  N  
Treatment of GBARD going to R&D abroad FM2015 §12.19  N   GBARD includes government-financed R&D performed abroad.
Criterion for distribution by socioeconomic objective FM2015 §12.50 to 12.71  N  
Method of identification of primary objective Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics, topic 2, statement B.6  N  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
Provisional data  7 years  2001 and 1997, 1992 and 1991, 1983, 2006, 2016   2001 and 1997: there were breaks in the series due to changes in the method of evaluating defence appropriations, which are included entirely in the objective “Defence”.

1992 and 1991: firstly, there was a change in methodology. The data are now based on a survey on socio-economic objectives sent to the agencies and ministries administering the civilian R&D budget, but also to subsidiary agencies. Secondly, the legal status of France Télécom and GIAT industries has changed, since they have left the government sector for the private sector.

1983: following adoption of the NABS 1983, there was a break in the Defence objective.

2006: implementation of the Constitutional Bylaw on Budget Acts: applied to the central government budget with a new framework of presentation for expenditures by public policies. These policies are translated into missions and programmes.

2016 : new classification

The budget appropriations for R & D gathered in the "Mission Research and Higher Education" (MIRES).

From that date, the remuneration of teachers and researchers for their research activity is now integrated in the R & D budget appropriations.

Final data  7 years  2001 and 1997, 1992 and 1991, 1983, 2006, 2016  2001 and 1997: there were breaks in the series due to changes in the method of evaluating defence appropriations, which are included entirely in the objective “Defence”.

1992 and 1991: firstly, there was a change in methodology. The data are now based on a survey on socio-economic objectives sent to the agencies and ministries administering the civilian R&D budget, but also to subsidiary agencies. Secondly, the legal status of France Télécom and GIAT industries has changed, since they have left the government sector for the private sector.

1983: following adoption of the NABS 1983, there was a break in the Defence objective.

2006: implementation of the Constitutional Bylaw on Budget Acts: applied to the central government budget with a new framework of presentation for expenditures by public policies. These policies are translated into missions and programmes.

2016 : new classification

The budget appropriations for R & D gathered in the "Mission Research and Higher Education" (MIRES).

From that date, the remuneration of teachers and researchers for their research activity is now integrated in the R & D budget appropriations.

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

This part deals with any national coherence assessments which may have been undertaken. 

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.4. Coherence - internal

This part compares GBARD statistics from the provisional and final budget for the reference year.

15.4.1. Comparison between provisional and final data according to NABS 2007
  R&D allocations in the provisional budget delivered at T+6 R&D allocations in the final budget delivered at T+12 Difference (of final data)
Exploration and exploitation of the Earth  142384  142384  0
Environment  511243  511243  0
Exploration and exploitation of space  1960437  1960437  0
Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures  1538502  1538502  0
Energy  1257395  1257395  0
Industrial production and technology  138260  138260  0
Health  1276540  1276540  0
Agriculture  354849  354849  0
Education  28742  28742  0
Culture, recreation, religion and mass media  257939  257939  0
Political and social systems, structures and processes  28085  28085  0
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from General University Funds (GUF)  4289549  4289549  0
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from other sources than GUF  3993195  3993195  0
Defence  1882787  1882787  0
TOTAL GBARD  
 
16257899
 16257899  0


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs    0%
Data collection costs    0%
Other costs    0%
Total costs    0%
Comments on costs
 There is no cost calculation. 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  70  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  This information is not requested.  
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  100€  Estimation
Total cost    

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

Not requested.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

a)       Provisional data:

Mires survey on budgetary appropriations intended for scientific research and technological development under the annual finance bill

b)      Final data:

Mires survey on budgetary appropriations intended for scientific research and technological development under the annual finance bill

c)       General University Funds (GUF):

Mires survey on budgetary appropriations intended for scientific research and technological development under the annual finance bill

 

18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
  Provisional data Final data Comments
Data collection method  Budget text analysis and survey through questionnaires  Budget text analysis and survey through questionnaires   
Stage of data collection Initial budget appropriations (figures as voted by the parliament for the coming year, including changes introduced in the parliamentary debate)   Initial budget appropriations (figures as voted by the parliament for the coming year, including changes introduced in the parliamentary debate)   
Reporting units  The organization that implements the budget and the institution funding, for all aspects relating to financial incentives, in particular, the reporting unit The organization that implements the budget and the institution funding, for all aspects relating to financial incentives, in particular, the reporting unit   
Basic variable Budget appropriations Budget appropriations  
Time of data collection (T+x)1) In year n, we work on the budget of year n, 6 months after the beginning of its implementation.

The availability of data on Defence entirely determines our ability to respond more quickly.

In year n, we work on the budget of year n, 6 months after the beginning of its implementation.

The availability of data on Defence entirely determines our ability to respond more quickly.

 
Problems in the translation of budget items  No problem.

1) Time of data collection (T+x): T is assumed to represent the end of reference period. x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is collected.

18.3.2. General University Funds (GUF)

Not requested

18.3.3. Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO)
Level of distribution of budgetary items – institution or programme/project  Both methods are used, the choice having been left up to the reporting organization, so as to take into account the diversity of types of organization
Criterion of distribution – purpose or content It is difficult to distinguish between the two methods and to know the method used by respondents.

This is one of the reasons why only the NABS level 1 is used.

Method of identification of primary objectives Guidelines are given to the respondents.
Difficulties of distribution  Yes for a few little bodies.
18.3.4. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English:  N
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/enquete-sur-les-objectifs-socio-economiques-des-credits-budgetaires-destines-la-rd-81712
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  N
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  N
18.4. Data validation

Controling with the finance bill.

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

Imputation is the method of creating plausible (but artificial) substitute values for all those missing.

Imputation by substituting finance bill data.

18.5.2. Data compilation methods

See below.

18.5.2.1. Identifying R&D
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D An effort is being made to take into account the reference to the Frascati Manual (for example, the Museum of Science and Industry [la cité des sciences et de l’industrie] has been withdrawn and the Ministry for Industry and the Ministry for Infrastructure are not included in their entirety). 
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  Not available
Coefficient estimation method  Not available
Frequency of updating of coefficients  Not available
18.5.2.2. General University Funds (GUF)
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D  Not available
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable)  Not available
Coefficient estimation method   Not available
Frequency of updating of coefficients   Not available
18.5.2.3. Other issues
Treatment of multi-annual programmes   Not available
Possibility to classify budgetary items by COFOG functions  No, as far as we know, this work has never been undertaken.
Possibility to classify budgetary items by other nomenclatures e.g. NACE   Not available
Method of estimation of future budgets   We work on the current year. 
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top