Government budget allocations for R&D (GBARD) (gba)

National Reference Metadata in Single Integrated Metadata Structure (SIMS)

Compiling agency: Statistics Estonia


Eurostat metadata
Reference metadata
1. Contact
2. Metadata update
3. Statistical presentation
4. Unit of measure
5. Reference Period
6. Institutional Mandate
7. Confidentiality
8. Release policy
9. Frequency of dissemination
10. Accessibility and clarity
11. Quality management
12. Relevance
13. Accuracy
14. Timeliness and punctuality
15. Coherence and comparability
16. Cost and Burden
17. Data revision
18. Statistical processing
19. Comment
Related Metadata
Annexes (including footnotes)
 



For any question on data and metadata, please contact: Eurostat user support

Download


1. Contact Top
1.1. Contact organisation

Statistics Estonia

1.2. Contact organisation unit

Economic and Environmental Statistics Department

1.5. Contact mail address

51 Tatari Str, 10134 Tallinn, Estonia


2. Metadata update Top
2.1. Metadata last certified 25/03/2022
2.2. Metadata last posted 25/03/2022
2.3. Metadata last update 25/03/2022


3. Statistical presentation Top
3.1. Data description

Statistics on Government Budget Allocations for R&D (GBARD) measure government support to research and development (R&D) activities, and thereby provide information about the priority governments give to different public R&D funding activities. This type of funder-based approach for reporting R&D involves identifying all the budget items that may support R&D activities and measuring or estimating their R&D content.

Main concepts and definitions used for the production of R&D statistics are given by the OECD (2015), Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development, The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities (FM 2015, Chapter 12), which is the internationally recognised standard methodology for collecting R&D statistics and by Eurostat’s European Business Statistics Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics (EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics).

Since the beginning of 2021, the collection of R&D statistics is based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020.

The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics (europa.eu)).

Statistics on science, technology and innovation were collected until the end of 2020 based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

3.2. Classification system

Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO) is based on the Nomenclature for the Analysis and Comparisons of Scientific Programmes and Budgets (NABS) at one digit level.

3.2.1. National classification
National nomenclature of SEO used  NABS used and only in chapter level
Correspondence table with NABS  N/A
3.2.2. NABS classification
Deviations from NABS  No
Problems in identifying / separating NABS chapters and sub chapters  Sub-chapters are not used
Ability to distribute Non-oriented research and General University Funds (GUF) by fields of R&D   No
3.3. Coverage - sector

See below.

3.3.1. General coverage
Definition of R&D  Consistent with the Frascati Manual definition
Coverage of R&D or S&T in general  R&D
Fields of R&D (FORD) covered  All
Socioeconomic objective (SEO by NABS)  N/A
3.3.2. Definition and coverage of government

GBARD statistics are assumed to report detailed data on all the government's budget items that may support R&D activities and to measure or estimate their R&D content. For the purposes of GBARD, the Government sector comprises (a) the central (federal) government, (b) regional (state) government and (c) local (municipal) government subsectors (FM2015, Chapter 12).

 

Levels of government Definition Included / Not included Comments
Central (federal) government  R&D performers financed by central government  Included  
Regional (state) government      Not included
Local (municipal) government  R&D performers financed by local government  Included  
3.4. Statistical concepts and definitions

Not requested.

3.5. Statistical unit

State budget allocations for research and development

3.6. Statistical population

See below.

3.6.1. National target population

The target population is the population for which inferences are made. The frame (or frames, as sometimes several frames are used) is a device that permits access to population units. The frame population is the set of population units, which can be accessed through the frame and the survey data really refer to this population.

 

Definition of the national target population N/A
Estimation of the target population size N/A
3.7. Reference area

Not requested.

3.8. Coverage - Time

Not requested. See point 5.

3.9. Base period

Not requested. .


4. Unit of measure Top

Not requested.


5. Reference Period Top

a) Calendar year: 2021

 

b) Fiscal year:

    Start month:

    End month:


6. Institutional Mandate Top
6.1. Institutional Mandate - legal acts and other agreements

See below.

6.1.1. European legislation

Since the beginning of 2021, GBARD statistics are based on Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197 of 30 July 2020 laying down technical specifications and arrangements pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2019/2152 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European business statistics repealing 10 legal acts in the field of business statistics. The Regulation sets the framework for the collection of R&D statistics and specifies the main variables of interest and their breakdowns at predefined level of detail.  GBARD statistics were based until the end of 2020 on the Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2012/995 concerning the production and development of Community statistics on science and technology.

6.1.2. National legislation

Official Statistics Act

6.1.3. Standards and manuals

-          Frascati Manual 2015, Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development

-          EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics

6.2. Institutional Mandate - data sharing

Not requested.


7. Confidentiality Top
7.1. Confidentiality - policy

Confidentiality, being one of the process quality components, concerns the privacy of data providers (households, enterprises, administrations and other respondents), the confidentiality of the information they provide and the extent of its use for statistical purposes.

A property of data indicating the extent to which their unauthorised disclosure could be prejudicial or harmful to the interest of the source or other relevant parties.

 

a)       Confidentiality protection required by law: Yes

 

b)       Confidentiality commitments of survey staff: N/A

 

7.2. Confidentiality - data treatment

Confidentiality is not used for GBARD data


8. Release policy Top
8.1. Release calendar

Release calendar



Annexes:
Release calendar
8.2. Release calendar access

.



Annexes:
Release calendar
8.3. Release policy - user access

All users have been granted equal access to official statistics: dissemination dates of official statistics are announced in advance and no user category (incl. Eurostat, state authorities and mass media) is provided access to official statistics before other users. Official statistics are first published in the statistical database. If there is also a news release, it is published simultaneously with data in the statistical database. Official statistics are available on the website at 8:00 a.m. on the date announced in the release calendar.


9. Frequency of dissemination Top

Preliminary GBARD data T+6
Final GBARD data T+12


10. Accessibility and clarity Top
10.1. Dissemination format - News release

See below.

10.1.1. Availability of the releases
  Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
Regular releases  N There is no separate press release for GBARD data, but the press release for RD includes the information about the GBARD data. Press is released in beginning of december (T+12)
Ad-hoc releases    

1) Y - Yes, N – No

10.2. Dissemination format - Publications

See below.

10.2.1. Availability of means of dissemination
Means of dissemination Availability (Y/N)1 Content, format, links, ...
General publication/article

(paper, online)

N  GBARD data are published since 2016 in SE database together with other RD data
Specific paper publication

(paper, online)

 N  

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.3. Dissemination format - online database

https://andmed.stat.ee/en/stat



Annexes:
Online database
10.3.1. Data tables - consultations

Not requested.

10.4. Dissemination format - microdata access

See below.

10.4.1. Provisions affecting the access
Access rights to the information  N/A
Access cost policy  N/A
Micro-data anonymisation rules  
10.5. Dissemination format - other

See below.

10.5.1. Metadata - consultations

Not requested.

10.5.2. Availability of other dissemination means
Dissemination means Availability (Y/N)1  Micro-data / Aggregate figures Comments
Internet: main results available on the national statistical authority’s website  Y    
Data prepared for individual ad hoc requests  N    
Other  N    

1) Y – Yes, N - No 

10.6. Documentation on methodology

There are guidelines for submitting GBARD data, which are attached to the questionnaire to be filled in by the ministries. The quidelines are based on the FM methodolgy.
There is no separate methodology document that is described in national publications or in on-line methodological repositories.

10.6.1. Metadata completeness - rate

Not requested.

10.7. Quality management - documentation

See below.

10.7.1. Information and clarity
Type(s) of data accompanying information available (metadata, graphs, etc.)   Statistics in online database is accompanied with adequate metadata
Request on further clarification  Net approach in case of EU funds
Measure to increase clarity  No need
Impression of users on the clarity of the accompanying information to the data   The users’ phone interview survey showed they are satisfied with available data.


11. Quality management Top
11.1. Quality assurance

To assure the quality of processes and products, Statistics Estonia applies the EFQM Excellence Model, the European Statistics Code of Practice and the Quality Assurance Framework of the European Statistical System (ESS QAF). Statistics Estonia is also guided by the requirements in § 7. “Principles and quality criteria of producing official statistics” of the Official Statistics Act.

11.2. Quality management - assessment

Statistics Estonia performs all statistical activities according to an international model (Generic Statistical Business Process Model – GSBPM). According to the GSBPM, the final phase of statistical activities is overall evaluation using information gathered in each phase or sub-process; this information can take many forms, including feedback from users, process metadata, system metrics and suggestions from employees. This information is used to prepare the evaluation report which outlines all the quality problems related to the specific statistical activity and serves as input for improvement actions.


12. Relevance Top
12.1. Relevance - User Needs

See below.

12.1.1. Needs at national level
Users’ class1 Description of users Users’ needs
 1  President, Parliament, Ministries, political parties, governmental agencies and funds Data on capacity and trends of Estonian R&D performance by socio-economic objectives for R&D and innovation and education policy decisions and strategy planning
 2  Media for general public  Analysis of changes in Estonian R&D performance together with international comparisons
 3  Researches and students  Statistics and analysis
     

1)       Users' class codification

1- Institutions:
European level: Commission (DGs, Secretariat General), Council, European Parliament, ECB, other European agencies etc.
• in Member States, at the national or regional level: Ministries of Economy or Finance, other ministries (for sectoral comparisons), National Statistical Institutes and other statistical agencies (norms, training, etc.), and
International organisations: OECD, UN, IMF, ILO, etc.

2- Social actors: Employers’ associations, trade unions, lobbies, among others, at the European, national or regional level.

3- Media: International or regional media – specialized or for the general public – interested both in figures and analyses or comments. The media are the main channels of statistics to the general public.

4- Researchers and students (Researchers and students need statistics, analyses, ad hoc services, access to specific data.)

5- Enterprises or businesses (Either for their own market analysis, their marketing strategy (large enterprises) or because they offer consultancy services)

6- Other (User class defined for national purposes, different from the previous classes.)

12.2. Relevance - User Satisfaction

To evaluate if users' needs have been satisfied, the best way is to use user satisfaction surveys.

12.2.1. National Surveys and feedback
Conduction of a user satisfaction survey or any other type of monitoring user satisfaction  N/A
User satisfaction survey specific for GBARD statistics  N/A
Short description of the feedback received  N/A
12.3. Completeness

See below.

12.3.1. Data completeness - rate

Not available

12.3.2. Completeness - overview

Completeness is assessed via comparison of the data delivered against the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2020/1197.

  5

(Very Good)

4

(Good)

3

(Satisfactory)

2

 (Poor)

1

(Very poor)

Reasons for missing cells
Provisional budget statistics1  x          
Obligatory final budget statistics1  x          
Optional final budget statistics2        x   For NABS 12 and 13 subsectors information is incomplete as ministries do not have such detailed information.

1)  Criteria: Obligatory data (provisional budget and final budget). Only 'Very Good' = 100% and 'Very Poor' <100% apply.

2)  Criteria: Optional data (final budget). 'Very Good' = 100%; 'Good' = >75%;'Satisfactory' 50 to 75%%; 'Poor' 25 to 50%; 'Very Poor' 0 to 25%.

12.3.3. Data availability

See below.

12.3.3.1. Data availability – Provisional data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD Since 1999  yearly    T+6  
NABS Chapter level Since 1999  yearly    T+6  
NABS Sub-chapter level  N/A        
Special categories - Biotech  N/A        
Special categories - Nanotech  N/A        
Special categories - Security  N/A        

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.2. Data availability – Final data
  Availability1 Frequency of data collection Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)2 Comments
Total GBARD  Since 1999  yearly    T+12  
NABS Chapter level  Since 1999  yearly    T+12  
NABS Sub-chapter level  N/A        
Special categories - Biotech  N/A        
Special categories - Nanotech  N/A        
Special categories - Security  N/A        

1) Availability of the data: N: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

2) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled

12.3.3.3. Data availability – Other special categories
Special categories Stage1 Availability1 Frequency of data colletion Gap years – years with missing data Time of compilation (T+x)3 Comments
 No other spesial categories data are not available            
             
             
             
             
             

1) Stage: P - provisional, F - final. 

2) Availability of the data: No, data are not available, Y: Yes, data are available + start year.

3) Time of compilation: T is assumed to represent the end of reference period, x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is compiled


13. Accuracy Top
13.1. Accuracy - overall

Accuracy in the statistical sense denotes the closeness of computations or estimates to the exact or true values. Statistics are not equal with the true values because of variability (the statistics change from implementation to implementation of the survey due to random effects) and bias (the average of the possible values of the statistics from implementation to implementation is not equal to the true value due to systematic effects).

 

Several types of statistical errors occur during the survey process. The following typology of errors has been adopted:

1. Sampling errors. These only affect sample surveys. They are due to the fact that only a subset of the population, usually randomly selected, is enumerated.

2. Non-sampling errors. Non-sampling errors affect sample surveys and complete enumerations alike and comprise:

a) Coverage errors,

b) Measurement errors,

c) Non response errors and

d) Processing errors.

 

Model assumption errors should be treated under the heading of the respective error they are trying to reduce.

13.1.1. Accuracy - Overall by 'Types of Error'
Sampling errors Non-sampling errors1) Model-assumption Errors1) Perceived direction of the error2)
Coverage errors Measurement errors Processing errors Non response errors
 N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A  N/A

1)  Ranking of the type(s) of errors that result in over/under-estimation, from the most important source of error (1) to the least important source of error (5) In the event that errors of a particular type do not exist, is used the sign ‘-‘.

2)  The perceived direction of the ‘overall’ error using the signs “+” for over estimation, “-” for under estimation and “+/-” when assumption of the direction of the error cannot be made for GBARD.

13.1.2. Assessment of the accuracy
 Indicators 5 (Very Good)1 4 (Good)2 3 (Satisfactory)3 2 (Poor)4 1 (Very poor)5
 GBARD    x      
National public funding to transnationally coordinated R & D    x      

1) High level of coverage (At least all national or federal ministries and the ministries and agencies responsible for R&D funding at state or regional level). High rate of response (>90%) in data collection. All figures broken down by NABS.  

2) If at least one out of the three criteria described above would not be fully met.

3) In the event that the rate of response would be lower than 80% even by meeting the two remaining criteria.

4) In the event that the average rate of response would be lower than 70% and at least one of the two remaining criteria would not be met.

5) If all the three criteria described above are not met.

13.2. Sampling error

Not requested.

13.2.1. Sampling error - indicators

Not requested.

13.3. Non-sampling error

Non-sampling errors occur in all phases of a survey. They add to the sampling errors (if present) and contribute to decreasing overall accuracy. It is important to assess their relative weight in the total error and devote appropriate resources for their control and assessment.

13.3.1. Coverage error

Coverage errors are due to divergences between the target population and the frame population. The frame population is the set of target population members that has a chance to be selected into the survey sample. It is a listing of all items in the population from which the sample is drawn that contains contact details as well as sufficient information to perform stratification and sampling.

 

a)       Description/assessment of coverage errors: N/A

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect: Not applicable

 

13.3.1.1. Over-coverage - rate

Not applicable

13.3.1.2. Common units - proportion

Not requested.

13.3.2. Measurement error

Measurement errors occur during data collection and generate bias by recording values different than the true ones. The survey questionnaire used for data collection may have led to the recording of wrong values.

 

a)       Description/assessment of measurement errors: N/A

 

 

b)      Measures taken to reduce their effect: There are guidelines for respondents and trainings have been conducted.

13.3.3. Non response error

Non response errors: occur when a survey failed to collect data on all survey variables from all the population units designated for data collection in a sample or complete enumeration.

 

a) Problems in obtaining data from targeted information providers:N/A

 

b) Measures taken to reduce their effect:

 

c) Effect of non-response errors on the produced statistics:

 

13.3.3.1. Unit non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.3.2. Item non-response - rate

Not requested.

13.3.4. Processing error

Between data collection and the beginning of statistical analysis, data must undergo a certain processing: coding, data entry, data editing, imputation, etc. Errors introduced at these stages are called processing errors. Data editing identifies inconsistencies or errors in the data.

 

a)       Data processing and editing processes: data entry is checked for NABS codes as well as units of measurement. The processing also compares with previous years. In case of discrepancies, the Ministry of Education and Research will be contacted, which will provide data and specify the discrepancies.

b)      Description of errors:

 

c)       Measures taken to reduce their effect:

13.3.5. Model assumption error

Model assumption errors occur when the assumptions made for the estimation of parameters, models, the testing of statistical hypotheses, etc., are violated. As a result, the quality of the resulting statistics is affected (e.g. degrees of confidence might be inflated).

Description/assessment: N/A


14. Timeliness and punctuality Top
14.1. Timeliness

Timeliness and punctuality refer to time and dates, but in a different manner: the timeliness of statistics reflects the length of time between their availability and the event or phenomenon they describe. Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of the data and the target date on which they should have been delivered, with reference to dates announced in the official release calendar.

14.1.1. Time lag - first result

Date of first release of national data: T+6

14.1.2. Time lag - final result

Date of first release of national data: T+12

14.2. Punctuality

Punctuality refers to the time lag between the release date of data and the target date on which they were scheduled for release as announced officially.

14.2.1. Punctuality - delivery and publication

Punctuality of time schedule of data release = (Actual date of the data release) - (Scheduled date of the data release)

14.2.1.1. Deadline and date of data transmission
  Transmission of provisional data Transmission of final data
Legally defined deadline of data transmission (T+_ months) 6 12
Actual date of transmission of the data (T+x months)  6  12
Delay (days)   0  0
Reasoning for delay    


15. Coherence and comparability Top
15.1. Comparability - geographical

See below.

15.1.1. Asymmetry for mirror flow statistics - coefficient

Not requested.

15.1.2. Survey Concepts Issues

The following table lists a number of key survey concepts and conceptual issues; it gives reference to the Commission Regulation No 2020/1197, Frascati manual and the EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics paragraphs with recommendations about these concepts / issues.

 

Concept / Issue Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Research and development FM2015 Chapter 2 (mainly paragraphs 2.3 and 2.4).  No  
Coverage of levels of government FM2015, §12.5 to 12.9  No  
Socioeconomic objectives coverage and breakdown Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20  No Information on sub-sectors is incomplete
Reference period Reg. 2020/1197: Annex 1, Table 20   No  
15.1.3. Deviations from recommendations

GBARD encompass all spending allocations met from sources of government revenue foreseen within the budget, such as taxation. Spending allocations by extra-budgetary government entities are within the scope only to the extent that their funds are allocated through the budgetary process (FM2015 §12.9). The following table lists a number of key methodological issues, which may affect the international comparability of national GBARD statistics.

 

Methodological issues Reference to recommendations Deviation from recommendations  National definition / Treatment / Deviations from recommendations
Definition of GBARD FM § 12.9  No Funds from budget, from governmental foundations and agencies 
Stages of data collection FM2015 §12.41  No  
Gross / net approach, net principle FM2015 §12.20 and 12.21  No  
EU/other funds Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics  No  
Types of expenditure FM2015 §12.15 to 12.18  No  
Current and capital expenditure FM §12.15  No  
Extra budgetary funds FM §12.8, 12.20, 12.38  No  
Loans FM §12.31, 12.32, 12.34  No  
Indirect funding, tax rebates, etc. FM §12.31 - 12.38  No  
Treatment of multi-annual projects FM2015 §12.44  No  
Treatment of GBARD going to R&D abroad FM2015 §12.19  Yes  Not included, partly available
Criterion for distribution by socioeconomic objective FM2015 §12.50 to 12.71  No  
Method of identification of primary objective Eurostat's EBS Methodological Manual on R&D Statistics, topic 2, statement B.6  No  
15.2. Comparability - over time

See below.

15.2.1. Length of comparable time series

See below.

15.2.2. Breaks in time series
  Length  of comparable time series  Break years1 Nature of the breaks
Provisional data    2016, 2015

The Ministry of Education and Research (MER) collects and assembles the GBARD data at the national level based on the RD&I strategy and implementation plan “Knowledge based Estonia” (2014-2020). Data are collected through a questionnaire based on
NABS 2007 categories. Preliminary data at national level are compiled in June and final data In December. The new system was introduced in 2017 to compile GBARD data for 2016. Previously, there was no corresponding survey, the data was based on estimates compiled by Statistics Estonia.

 

Final data    2016, 2015  from 2015, separated from NABS 13 under NABS 12

1)       Breaks years are years for which data are not fully comparable to the previous period.

15.3. Coherence - cross domain

There are some differences as GBARD data is a state allocation for research and development, GERD is the R&D expenditure in the reference year. Differences may arise from the interpretation of the concept of R&D definition and the time shift between the allocation and use of money also plays a role. In generally the GBARD and GERD data are comparable

15.3.1. Coherence - sub annual and annual statistics

Not requested.

15.3.2. Coherence - National Accounts

Not requested.

15.4. Coherence - internal

This part compares GBARD statistics from the provisional and final budget for the reference year.

15.4.1. Comparison between provisional and final data according to NABS 2007
  R&D allocations in the provisional budget delivered at T+6 R&D allocations in the final budget delivered at T+12 Difference (of final data)
Exploration and exploitation of the Earth  2376,6   2376,6  
Environment  1961,1   1961,1  
Exploration and exploitation of space  6922,0   6922,0  
Transport, telecommunication and other infrastructures  1096,4  1096,4  
Energy  792,2  792,2  
Industrial production and technology  4720,4  4720,4  
Health  3373,9  3373,9  
Agriculture  10146,5  10146,5  
Education  471,5  471,5  
Culture, recreation, religion and mass media  2759,9  3141,8  +381,9
Political and social systems, structures and processes  8720,3  8720,3  
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from General University Funds (GUF)  38451,3  38451,3  
General advancement of knowledge: R&D financed from other sources than GUF  129117,2  128735,3  -381,9
Defence  4815,7  4815,7  
TOTAL GBARD  215725,1  215725,1  


16. Cost and Burden Top

The assessment of costs associated with a statistical product is a rather complicated task since there must exist a mechanism for appointing portions of shared costs (for instance shared IT resources and dissemination channels) and overheads (office space, utility bills etc). The assessment must become detailed and clear enough so that international comparisons among agencies of different structures are feasible. 

16.1. Costs summary
  Costs for the statistical authority (in national currency) % sub-contracted1)
Staff costs  N/A  
Data collection costs  N/A  
Other costs  N/A  
Total costs  N/A  
Comments on costs
 

1)       The shares of the figures given in the first column that are accounted for by payments to private firms or other Government agencies.

16.2. Components of burden and description of how these estimates were reached
  Value Computation method
Number of Respondents (R)  N/A  
Average Time required to complete the questionnaire in hours (T)1  N/A  
Average hourly cost (in national currency) of a respondent (C)  N/A  
Total cost  N/A  

1)        T = the time required to provide the information, including time spent assembling information prior to completing a form or taking part in interview and the time taken up by any subsequent contacts after receipt of the questionnaire (‘Re-contact time’)


17. Data revision Top
17.1. Data revision - policy

The data revision policy and notification of corrections are described in the section Principles of dissemination of official statistics of the website of Statistics Estonia.

17.2. Data revision - practice

Not requested.

17.2.1. Data revision - average size

Not requested.


18. Statistical processing Top
18.1. Source data

a)       Provisional data: survey questionnaire

 

b)      Final data: survey questionnaire

 

c)       General University Funds (GUF): survey questionnaire

18.2. Frequency of data collection

See 12.3.3.

18.3. Data collection

See below.

18.3.1. Data collection overview
  Provisional data Final data Comments
Data collection method The Ministry of Education and Research (MER) collects and assembles the GBARD data at the national level based on the RD&I strategy and implementation plan “Knowledge
based Estonia” (2014-2020).
The Ministry of Education and Research (MER) collects and assembles the GBARD data at the national level based on the RD&I strategy and implementation plan “Knowledge
based Estonia” (2014-2020).
 
Stage of data collection Obligations   Obligations  
Reporting units  The Ministry of Education and Research (MER) The Ministry of Education and Research (MER)  
Basic variable  appropriations  appropriations  
Time of data collection (T+x)1)  T+6 preliminar data, T+12 revised data if there are changes    
Problems in the translation of budget items  Not applicable

1) Time of data collection (T+x): T is assumed to represent the end of reference period. x expresses the number of months after (positive) or before (negative) T when data is collected.

18.3.2. General University Funds (GUF)

survey questionnaire

18.3.3. Distribution by socioeconomic objectives (SEO)
Level of distribution of budgetary items – institution or programme/project  Institution or programme/project: programme/project
Criterion of distribution – purpose or content  purpose
Method of identification of primary objectives  Purpose of the programme/project funding
Difficulties of distribution  -
18.3.4. Questionnaire and other documents
Annex Name of the file
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in English: N/A
GBARD national questionnaire and explanatory notes in the national language:  N/A
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in English:  N/A
Other relevant documentation of national methodology in the national language:  N/A
18.4. Data validation

The initial verification of the data at the micro-data level is carried out by the Ministry of Science and Education, which compiles the data. The SE checks the comparison of the data with the previous period, the units of measurement as well as the NABS categories

18.5. Data compilation

See below.

18.5.1. Imputation - rate

No imputation

18.5.2. Data compilation methods

See below.

18.5.2.1. Identifying R&D
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D N/A
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable) N/A
Coefficient estimation method N/A
Frequency of updating of coefficients N/A
18.5.2.2. General University Funds (GUF)
Method(s) of separating R&D from non-R&D Not applicable
Description of the use of the coefficient (if applicable) Not applicable
Coefficient estimation method Not applicable
Frequency of updating of coefficients Not applicable
18.5.2.3. Other issues
Treatment of multi-annual programmes  Budgeted year
Possibility to classify budgetary items by COFOG functions  Not applicable
Possibility to classify budgetary items by other nomenclatures e.g. NACE  Not applicable
Method of estimation of future budgets  Growth rates
18.6. Adjustment

Not requested.

18.6.1. Seasonal adjustment

Not requested.


19. Comment Top


Related metadata Top


Annexes Top